Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof (II); Institution of Investigation, 834-835 [2018-00105]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
834
[FR Doc. 2018–00083 Filed 1–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–C
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1093]
Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and
Radio Frequency and Processing
Components Thereof (II); Institution of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
November 30, 2017, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
on behalf of Qualcomm Incorporated of
San Diego, California. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain mobile electronic
devices and radio frequency and
processing components thereof by
reason of infringement of certain claims
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Jan 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
of U.S. Patent No. 9,154,356 (‘‘the ’356
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 9,473,336 (‘‘the
’336 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,063,674
(‘‘the ’674 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
7,693,002 (‘‘the ’002 patent’’); and U.S.
Patent No. 9,552,633 (‘‘the ’633 patent’’).
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and a cease and
desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
January 2, 2018, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM
08JAN1
EN08JA18.001</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 5 / Monday, January 8, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 5 / Monday, January 8, 2018 / Notices
importation of certain mobile electronic
devices and radio frequency and
processing components thereof by
reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1, 7, 8, 10, 11, 17, and 18 of the
’356 patent; claim 4 of the ’336 patent;
claims 1, 5–8, 12, 16–18, and 21–22 of
the ’674 patent; claims 1–4, 7–9, 11, 17,
20–23, 31–33 and 36 of the ’002 patent;
and claims 1–3, 10–12, 18, and 22–24 of
the ’633 patent; and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding Administrative Law Judge
shall take evidence or other information
and hear arguments from the parties or
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in his investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
Qualcomm Incorporated, 5775
Morehouse Drive, San Diego, CA
92121.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino,
CA 95014.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Jan 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 3, 2018.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–00105 Filed 1–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1092]
Certain Self-Anchoring Beverage
Containers; Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
October 31, 2017, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Mighty Mug, Inc. of Rahway,
New Jersey. An amended complaint was
filed on December 1, 2017, on behalf of
Alfay Designs, Inc., of Rahway, New
Jersey, Mighty Mug, Inc., of Rahway,
New Jersey, and Harry Zimmerman of
Los Angeles, California. Supplements to
the amended complaint were filed on
December 4, 8, 19, and 22, 2017. The
amended complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of selfanchoring beverage containers by reason
of infringement of (1) certain claims of
U.S. Patent No. 8,028,850 (‘‘the ’850
patent’’) and U.S. Patent No. 8,757,418
(‘‘the ’418 patent’’); and (2) U.S.
Trademark Registration No. 4,191,803
(‘‘the ’803 trademark’’). The amended
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists or
is in the process of being established as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
835
general exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The amended complaint,
except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Room 112, Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205–2000.
Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the amended complaint, the
U.S. International Trade Commission,
on January 2, 2018, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine:
(a) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain self-anchoring beverage
containers by reason of infringement of
one or more of claim 1 of the ’850 patent
and claim 1 of the ’418 patent; and
whether an industry in the United
States exists or is in the process of being
established as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(b) whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain self-anchoring beverage
containers by reason of infringement of
E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM
08JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 834-835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00105]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1093]
Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and
Processing Components Thereof (II); Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on November 30, 2017, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Qualcomm
Incorporated of San Diego, California. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain mobile electronic devices and radio frequency
and processing components thereof by reason of infringement of certain
claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,154,356 (``the '356 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 9,473,336 (``the '336 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,063,674 (``the
'674 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,693,002 (``the '002 patent''); and
U.S. Patent No. 9,552,633 (``the '633 patent''). The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and a cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on January 2, 2018, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after
[[Page 835]]
importation of certain mobile electronic devices and radio frequency
and processing components thereof by reason of infringement of one or
more of claims 1, 7, 8, 10, 11, 17, and 18 of the '356 patent; claim 4
of the '336 patent; claims 1, 5-8, 12, 16-18, and 21-22 of the '674
patent; claims 1-4, 7-9, 11, 17, 20-23, 31-33 and 36 of the '002
patent; and claims 1-3, 10-12, 18, and 22-24 of the '633 patent; and
whether an industry in the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding Administrative Law Judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties or other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in his investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1),
(f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
Qualcomm Incorporated, 5775 Morehouse Drive, San Diego, CA 92121.
(b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is
to be served:
Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 3, 2018.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-00105 Filed 1-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
