Applications To Serve as Accountability Agents in the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Privacy Recognition for Processors (PRP) System, 657-658 [2018-00046]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Notices
www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_
exp.php?project=49607.
The project originally was released for
scoping comments as an environmental
assessment (EA) as described above.
Subsequent to the initial EA scoping
efforts and based on the overall project
scope and complexity—including its
associated analyses—it was determined
that an EIS would better provide a more
appropriate vehicle than an EA for
evaluating project information
important to the public and decisionmaker. Though the Forest Service
anticipates and intends that this project
will be beneficial for landscape
restoration, due to these complex
circumstances, the Forest Service
proposes to develop an EIS to ensure
sufficient analysis and to further the
intent of NEPA.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Scoping Process
Comments and submittals already
received during the previously
conducted public scoping comment
period are part of the record and have
been considered during further
development of the project and its draft
EIS and need not be re-submitted for the
commenter to retain standing in the
event of possible future objections.
Furthermore, the draft EIS, including
analysis of the project-specific plan
amendment, is anticipated to be filed
with the Enviromental Protection
Agency (EPA) and available for public
review and a designated 45-day public
comment by early 2018. The EPA will
publish a Notice of Availability of the
draft EIS in the Federal Register. At
such time, detailed instructions for how
to submit comments regarding both the
project-specific plan amendment and
the draft EIS will be provided.
Comments received, including names
and addresses of those who comment,
will be part of the public record for this
proposed action and will be available
for public inspection. Comments
submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered; however,
anonymous comments will not afford
the Agency the ability to provide the
respondent with subsequent
environmental documents, nor will
those who submit anonymous
comments have standing to object to the
subsequent decision under 36 CFR 218.
Access and review for documents
related to information in this notice is
available at: https://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/
nepa_project_exp.php?project=49607.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jan 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
Dated: December 21, 2017.
Glenn P. Casamassa,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System.
[FR Doc. 2018–00049 Filed 1–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Docket No.: 160721646–6646–01]
RIN No. 0625–XC022
Applications To Serve as
Accountability Agents in the Asia
Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)
Privacy Recognition for Processors
(PRP) System
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of opportunity for
organizations to submit applications to
serve as Accountability Agents in the
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation
(APEC) Privacy Recognition for
Processors (PRP) system.
AGENCY:
The International Trade
Administration’s Office of Digital
Services Industries (ODSI) invites
interested organizations to submit
applications for recognition by APEC to
act as an Accountability Agent for U.S.based companies that are subject to
Federal Trade Commission jurisdiction
as part of APEC’s Privacy Recognition
for Processors system.
DATES: Applications may be submitted
beginning December 29, 2017. Until
further notice, there is no closing date
for submitting applications.
ADDRESSES: Please submit applications
by email to michael.rose@trade.gov,
attention: Michael Rose, Office of Digital
Services Industries, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for additional instructions
on submitting applications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All
questions concerning this notice should
be sent to the attention of Michael Rose,
Office of Digital Services Industries,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, by
telephone at (202) 815–0374 (this is not
a toll-free number) or by email at
michael.rose@trade.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2004,
Leaders of the 21 APEC economies 1
SUMMARY:
1 The 21 APEC economies are Australia, Brunei
Darussalam, Canada, Chile, the People’s Republic of
China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, the Republic
of Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
657
endorsed the ‘‘APEC Privacy
Framework’’ (Framework). The goal of
the Framework is to facilitate the flow
of information between the 21
economies in APEC by promoting a
common set of privacy principles that
will enhance electronic commerce,
facilitate trade and economic growth,
and strengthen consumer privacy
protections. In order to implement this
Framework, member economies
developed a voluntary system of Cross
Border Privacy Rules (CBPR), which
was endorsed by APEC Leaders in
November 2011 (the Leaders’
Declaration is available at https://
www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/LeadersDeclarations/2011/2011_aelm.aspx).
The Leaders’ Declaration instructs APEC
member economies to implement the
APEC CBPR system to reduce barriers to
information flows, enhance consumer
privacy, and promote interoperability
across regional data privacy regimes. In
July 2012, the United States formally
commenced participation in the CBPR
system. The United States issued an
open invitation for interested
organizations to submit applications for
recognition by APEC to act as an
Accountability Agent for U.S.-based
companies that are subject to Federal
Trade Commission jurisdiction as part
of APEC CBPR system, available at:
https://www.federalregister.gov/
documents/2012/07/30/2012-18515/
applications-to-serve-as-accountabilityagents-in-the-asia-pacific-economiccooperation-apec-cross.
The APEC CBPR system applies to
personal information controllers
(‘‘controller’’), defined in the
Framework as ‘‘person(s) or
organization(s) who control the
collection, holding, processing or use of
personal information’’. APEC developed
the Privacy Recognition for Processors
(PRP) system to complement the CBPR
system, and APEC Leaders endorsed the
PRP system in February 2015. The
United States was approved by APEC
economies on the Joint Oversight Panel,
the body overseeing the CBPR and PRP
systems, to participate in the PRP
system on November 15, 2017.
The PRP system is designed to help
personal information processors
(‘‘processors’’), third parties that are
acting as agents to perform task(s) on
behalf of and under the instructions of
a controller, demonstrate their ability to
implement a controller’s privacy
obligations related to the processing of
personal information. The PRP system
also helps controllers identify qualified
New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore,
Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States, and
Vietnam.
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
658
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Notices
and accountable processors and helps
ensure that processing is consistent with
the controller’s CBPR System processing
requirements.
The PRP system requires processors to
implement privacy policies and
practices consistent with the PRP
system requirements for all personal
information that they process on behalf
of controllers, and these policies and
practices must be assessed as compliant
by an APEC-recognized Accountability
Agent (‘‘PRP certification’’). Under the
PRP system, an ‘‘Accountability Agent’’
is a third-party organization that
provides verification services related to
the data privacy policies and practices
for those processors seeking PRP
certification. Only APEC-recognized
Accountability Agents may perform PRP
certifications.
An Accountability Agent may only
provide PRP certification for a U.S.
processor that is subject to the
enforcement authority of the Federal
Trade Commission, the U.S. privacy
enforcement authority.
An applicant may be designated as an
Accountability Agent if APEC member
economies recognize that it meets the
recognition criteria agreed to by APEC.
Those criteria are set forth in the
Accountability Agent APEC Application
for the PRP System (‘‘APEC PRP System
Guide’’), which is available at: https://
cbprs.blob.core.windows.net/files/
Accountability%20Agent
%20Application%20for%20PRP
%20Revised%20For%20Posting%20316.pdf.
Organizations interested in being
designated as an Accountability Agent
should notify the Department of
Commerce of their interest in obtaining
APEC recognition and submit the
information described in the APEC PRP
System Guide to the Office of Digital
Services Industries by email at
michael.rose@trade.gov.
Dated: December 29, 2017.
James Sullivan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2018–00046 Filed 1–4–18; 8:45 am]
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jan 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–983]
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Determination
of No Shipments; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on drawn
stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) from
the People’s Republic of China (China).
The period of review (POR) is April 1,
2016, through March 31, 2017. The
review covers two mandatory
respondents, Feidong Import and Export
Co., Ltd. (Feidong) and Foshan
Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd (Zhaoshun).
We preliminarily determine that neither
mandatory respondent qualifies for a
separate rate and, therefore, both are
considered part of the China-wide
entity. Additionally, we are
preliminarily including two companies
that failed to demonstrate their
entitlement to a separate rate (i.e.,
Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd.
(Hongmao) and Yuyao Afa Kitchenware
Co., Ltd. (Yuyao)) as part of the Chinawide entity. We also preliminarily grant
separate rates to the following
companies which demonstrated
eligibility for separate rate status but
were not selected for individual
examination: Jiangmen New Star HiTech Enterprise Ltd. (New Star);
KaiPing Dawn Plumbing Products, Inc.
(KaiPing); Guangdong New Shichu
Import and Export Company Limited
(New Sichu); and Ningbo Afa Kitchen
and Bath Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Afa). Finally,
we preliminarily find that B&R
Industries Limited (B&R); Xinhe
Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd.
(Xinhe); Zhongshan Superte
Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Superte); and
Zhuhai KOHLER Kitchen & Bathroom
Products Co., Ltd. (Zhuhai KOHLER)
made no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR. We invite
interested parties to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable January 5, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Janz or Ajay Menon, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2972 or (202) 482–1993,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order
include drawn stainless steel sinks.
Imports of subject merchandise are
currently classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings
7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.1
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Based on our analysis of CBP
information and information provided
by the companies, we preliminarily
determine that B&R, Superte, Xinhe,
and Zhuhai KOHLER did not have any
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR. In addition, Commerce
finds that, consistent with its
assessment practice in non-market
economy (NME) cases, it is appropriate
not to rescind the review in part in these
circumstances, but to complete the
review with respect to these four
companies and issue appropriate
instructions to CBP based on the final
results.2 For additional information
regarding this determination, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). Because Feidong is majority
government-owned and Foshan did not
respond to the NME questionnaire, we
preliminarily determine that they are
not eligible for a separate rate and are
part of the China-wide entity, subject to
the China-wide entity rate of 76.45
percent.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
1 For a complete description of the Scope of the
Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum
for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks
from the People’s Republic of China,’’ issued
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
2 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) (NME AD
Assessment) and the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section,
below.
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 657-658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00046]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Docket No.: 160721646-6646-01]
RIN No. 0625-XC022
Applications To Serve as Accountability Agents in the Asia
Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Privacy Recognition for Processors
(PRP) System
AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of opportunity for organizations to submit applications
to serve as Accountability Agents in the Asia Pacific Economic
Cooperation (APEC) Privacy Recognition for Processors (PRP) system.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The International Trade Administration's Office of Digital
Services Industries (ODSI) invites interested organizations to submit
applications for recognition by APEC to act as an Accountability Agent
for U.S.-based companies that are subject to Federal Trade Commission
jurisdiction as part of APEC's Privacy Recognition for Processors
system.
DATES: Applications may be submitted beginning December 29, 2017. Until
further notice, there is no closing date for submitting applications.
ADDRESSES: Please submit applications by email to
[email protected], attention: Michael Rose, Office of Digital
Services Industries, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for additional
instructions on submitting applications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All questions concerning this notice
should be sent to the attention of Michael Rose, Office of Digital
Services Industries, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, by telephone at (202) 815-0374 (this is not a
toll-free number) or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2004, Leaders of the 21 APEC economies
\1\ endorsed the ``APEC Privacy Framework'' (Framework). The goal of
the Framework is to facilitate the flow of information between the 21
economies in APEC by promoting a common set of privacy principles that
will enhance electronic commerce, facilitate trade and economic growth,
and strengthen consumer privacy protections. In order to implement this
Framework, member economies developed a voluntary system of Cross
Border Privacy Rules (CBPR), which was endorsed by APEC Leaders in
November 2011 (the Leaders' Declaration is available at https://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2011/2011_aelm.aspx).
The Leaders' Declaration instructs APEC member economies to implement
the APEC CBPR system to reduce barriers to information flows, enhance
consumer privacy, and promote interoperability across regional data
privacy regimes. In July 2012, the United States formally commenced
participation in the CBPR system. The United States issued an open
invitation for interested organizations to submit applications for
recognition by APEC to act as an Accountability Agent for U.S.-based
companies that are subject to Federal Trade Commission jurisdiction as
part of APEC CBPR system, available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/07/30/2012-18515/applications-to-serve-as-accountability-agents-in-the-asia-pacific-economic-cooperation-apec-cross.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The 21 APEC economies are Australia, Brunei Darussalam,
Canada, Chile, the People's Republic of China, Hong Kong, Indonesia,
Japan, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua
New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei,
Thailand, the United States, and Vietnam.*COM019*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The APEC CBPR system applies to personal information controllers
(``controller''), defined in the Framework as ``person(s) or
organization(s) who control the collection, holding, processing or use
of personal information''. APEC developed the Privacy Recognition for
Processors (PRP) system to complement the CBPR system, and APEC Leaders
endorsed the PRP system in February 2015. The United States was
approved by APEC economies on the Joint Oversight Panel, the body
overseeing the CBPR and PRP systems, to participate in the PRP system
on November 15, 2017.
The PRP system is designed to help personal information processors
(``processors''), third parties that are acting as agents to perform
task(s) on behalf of and under the instructions of a controller,
demonstrate their ability to implement a controller's privacy
obligations related to the processing of personal information. The PRP
system also helps controllers identify qualified
[[Page 658]]
and accountable processors and helps ensure that processing is
consistent with the controller's CBPR System processing requirements.
The PRP system requires processors to implement privacy policies
and practices consistent with the PRP system requirements for all
personal information that they process on behalf of controllers, and
these policies and practices must be assessed as compliant by an APEC-
recognized Accountability Agent (``PRP certification''). Under the PRP
system, an ``Accountability Agent'' is a third-party organization that
provides verification services related to the data privacy policies and
practices for those processors seeking PRP certification. Only APEC-
recognized Accountability Agents may perform PRP certifications.
An Accountability Agent may only provide PRP certification for a
U.S. processor that is subject to the enforcement authority of the
Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. privacy enforcement authority.
An applicant may be designated as an Accountability Agent if APEC
member economies recognize that it meets the recognition criteria
agreed to by APEC. Those criteria are set forth in the Accountability
Agent APEC Application for the PRP System (``APEC PRP System Guide''),
which is available at: https://cbprs.blob.core.windows.net/files/Accountability%20Agent%20Application%20for%20PRP%20Revised%20For%20Posting%203-16.pdf.
Organizations interested in being designated as an Accountability
Agent should notify the Department of Commerce of their interest in
obtaining APEC recognition and submit the information described in the
APEC PRP System Guide to the Office of Digital Services Industries by
email at [email protected].
Dated: December 29, 2017.
James Sullivan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services, U.S. Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2018-00046 Filed 1-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P