Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures, 660-662 [2017-28257]
Download as PDF
660
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Notices
Dated: December 29, 2017.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
entries of subject merchandise from
these companies will be liquidated at
the China-wide rate.13
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise from China
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
the companies listed above that have a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be that rate established in the final
results of this review (except, if the rate
is zero or de minimis, then a cash
deposit rate of zero will be established
for that company); (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed China and nonChina exporters that received a separate
rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all China exporters
of subject merchandise that have not
been found to be entitled to a separate
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate for the China-wide entity, which is
76.45 percent; and (4) for all non-China
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to China exporter(s) that
supplied that non-China exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Importers
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of Methodology
A. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
B. Non-Market Economy Country Status
C. Separate Rates Determination
1. Absence of De Jure Control
2. Absence of De Facto Control
3. Companies Not Eligible for a Separate
Rate
4. Separate Rate for Eligible, Non-Selected
Companies
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–00016 Filed 1–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–893]
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber
From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Affirmative Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,
Postponement of Final Determination,
and Extension of Provisional Measures
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) preliminarily
determines that fine denier polyester
staple fiber (fine denier PSF) from the
Republic of Korea (Korea) are being, or
is likely to be sold in the United States
at less than fair value (LTFV). The
period of investigation (POI) is April 1,
2016, through March 31, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karine Gziryan or Celeste Chen, AD/
CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4081 or (202) 482–0890,
respectively.
AGENCY:
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping and/
or countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results of review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and
777(i)(l) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.
Background
13 For a full discussion of this practice, see NME
AD Assessment.
This preliminary determination is
made in accordance with section 733(b)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). The Department published the
notice of initiation of this investigation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jan 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
DATES:
Applicable January 5, 2018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on June 27, 2017.1 On October 24, 2017,
the Department postponed the
preliminary determination of this
investigation and the revised deadline is
now December 18, 2017.2 For a
complete description of the events that
followed the initiation of this
investigation, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics
included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix
II to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be found at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is fine denier polyester
staple fiber from Korea. For a complete
description of the scope of this
investigation, see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the preamble to
the Department’s regulations,4 the
Initiation Notice set aside a period of
time for parties to raise issues regarding
product coverage (i.e., scope).5 Certain
interested parties commented on the
scope of the investigation as it appeared
in the Initiation Notice. For a summary
of the product coverage comments and
rebuttal responses submitted to the
record for this preliminary
determination, and accompanying
discussion and analysis of all comments
1 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the
People’s Republic of China, India, the Republic of
Korea, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigations, 82 FR 29023 (June 27, 2017)
(Initiation Notice).
2 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the
People’s Republic of China, India, the Republic of
Korea, and Taiwan: Postponement of Preliminary
Determinations in Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigations, 82 FR 49178 (October 24, 2017).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Determination in the Less-ThanFair Value Investigation of Fine Denier Polyester
Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties:
Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
5 See Initiation Notice.
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Notices
timely received, see the Preliminary
Scope Decision Memorandum.6 The
Department is preliminarily modifying
the scope language as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice. See the revised scope
in Appendix I to this notice.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Act. The Department has
calculated export prices in accordance
with section 772(a) of the Act. Normal
value (NV) is calculated in accordance
with section 773 of the Act.
Furthermore, pursuant to section 776(a)
and (b) of the Act, the Department has
preliminarily relied upon facts
otherwise available, with adverse
inferences, for Huvis Corporation
(Huvis) and Down Nara, Co. Ltd. (Down
Nara) which did not respond to the
Department’s questionnaire.7 For a full
description of the methodology
underlying the preliminary
determination, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
All-Others Rate
In accordance with section
735(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, the
Department determined weightedaverage dumping margins for each of the
producers/exporters of the subject
merchandise individually investigated.
Pursuant to sections 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) and
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the Department
shall determine an estimated all-others
rate for all exporters and producers not
individually examined equal to the
weighted average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero and de minimis margins, and any
margins determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act. Where the rates
for the individually investigated
companies are all zero or de minimis, or
determined entirely using facts
otherwise available, section 735(c)(5)(B)
of the Act instructs the Department to
establish ‘‘any reasonable method to
establish the estimated all-others rate for
exporters and producers not
individually investigated, including
averaging the estimated weighted
average dumping margins determined
for the exporters and producers
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester
Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea: Scope
Comments Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Determination’’ (Preliminary Scope
Decision Memorandum), dated December 8, 2017.
7 Toray Chemical Korea Inc. (TCK), Huvis, and
Down Nara are the mandatory respondents in this
investigation. See Huvis Corporation’s Letter, ‘‘Fine
Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of
Korea: Notice of Intent Not to Participate,’’ dated
August 10, 2017 (Huvis Notice of Intent).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jan 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
individually investigated.’’ The
Department has preliminarily
determined the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins for the two
non-responsive companies, Huvis and
Down Nara, under section 776 of the
Act and determined that the estimated
weighted-average dumping margin for
TCK is zero. Pursuant to section
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, we calculated
the ‘‘all-others’’’ rate as a simple average
of the zero percent dumping margin and
the two dumping margins based totally
on AFA. For a full description of the
methodology underlying the
Department’s analysis, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
661
that producer of the subject
merchandise, except as explained
below; and (3) the cash deposit rate for
all other producers and exporters will
be equal to the all-others estimated
weighted-average dumping margin.
Because the estimated weightedaverage dumping margin for TCK is
zero, entries of shipments of subject
merchandise produced and exported by
TCK will not be subject to suspension
of liquidation or cash deposit
requirements. In such situations, the
Department applies the exclusion to the
provisional measures to the producer/
exporter combination that was
examined in the investigation.
Accordingly, the Department is
Preliminary Determination
directing CBP not to suspend
The Department preliminarily
liquidation of entries of subject
determines that the following estimated merchandise produced and exported by
weighted-average dumping margins
TCK. Entries of shipments of subject
exist:
merchandise from TCK in any other
producer/exporter combination, or by
Estimated
third parties that sourced subject
weightedmerchandise from the excluded
average
Exporter/producer
dumping
producer/exporter combination, are
margin
subject to the provisional measures at
(percent)
the all others rate.
Should the final estimated weightedToray Chemical Korea Inc ........
(*)
Huvis Corporation .....................
45.23 average dumping margin be zero or de
Down Nara, Co., Ltd .................
45.23 minimis for subject merchandise
All-Others ..................................
30.15 exported and produced by TCK, entries
of shipments of subject merchandise
* de minimis.
from this producer/exporter
Consistent with section 733(b)(3) of
combination will be excluded from the
the Act, the Department disregards de
potential antidumping duty order. Such
minimis rates and preliminarily
exclusions are not applicable to
determines that the individually
merchandise exported to the United
examined respondent with a de minimis States by TCK in any other producer/
rate did not sell subject merchandise at
exporter combinations or by third
LTFV.
parties that sourced subject
merchandise from the excluded
Suspension of Liquidation
producer/exporter combinations.
In accordance with section 733(d)(2)
Disclosure
of the Act, the Department will direct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
The Department intends to disclose
(CBP) to suspend liquidation of entries
its calculations and analysis performed
of subject merchandise, as described in
to interested parties in this preliminary
Appendix I, entered, or withdrawn from determination within five days of any
warehouse, for consumption on or after
public announcement or, if there is no
the date of publication of this notice in
public announcement, within five days
the Federal Register. Further, pursuant
of the date of publication of this notice
to section 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
CFR 351.205(d), the Department will
Verification
instruct CBP to require a cash deposit
equal to the estimated weighted-average
As provided in section 782(i) of the
dumping margin or the estimated allAct, the Department intends to verify
others rate, as follows: (1) The cash
TCK ’s information relied upon in
deposit rate for the respondents listed
making its final determination.
above will be equal to the companyPublic Comment
specific estimated weighted-average
dumping margins determined in this
Case briefs or other written comments
preliminary determination; (2) if the
may be submitted to the Assistant
exporter is not a respondent identified
Secretary for Enforcement and
above, but the producer is, then the cash Compliance no later than seven days
deposit rate will be equal to the
after the date on which the final
company-specific estimated weightedverification report is issued in this
average dumping margin established for proceeding, unless the Secretary alters
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
662
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Notices
the time limit. Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in case briefs, may be
submitted no later than five days after
the deadline for case briefs.8 Pursuant to
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties
who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs
in this investigation are encouraged to
submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, limited to issues raised in the
case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a
written request for a hearing to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party’s name,
address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, whether any
participant is a foreign national, and a
list of the issues to be discussed. If a
request for a hearing is made, the
Department intends to hold the hearing
at the U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20230, at a time and
date to be determined. Parties should
confirm by telephone the date, time, and
location of the hearing two days before
the scheduled date.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Postponement of Final Determination
and Extension of Provisional Measures
Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides
that a final determination may be
postponed until not later than 135 days
after the date of the publication of the
preliminary determination if, in the
event of an affirmative preliminary
determination, a request for such
postponement is made by exporters who
account for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise, or in
the event of a negative preliminary
determination, a request for such
postponement is made by the petitioner.
Section 351.210(e)(2) of the
Department’s regulations requires that a
request by exporters for postponement
of the final antidumping determination
be accompanied by a request for
extension of provisional measures from
a four-month period to a period not
more than six months in duration.
On November 13, 2017, pursuant to
19 CFR 351.210(e), TCK requested that
the Department postpone the final
determination and that provisional
measures be extended to a period not to
exceed six months.9 In accordance with
8 See
19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303
(for general filing requirements).
9 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester
Staple Fiber from India, the People’s Republic of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jan 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii), because: (1) Our
preliminary determination is
affirmative; (2) the requesting exporter
accounts for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise; and
(3) no compelling reasons for denial
exist, the Department is postponing the
final determination and extending the
provisional measures from a four-month
period to a period not greater than six
months. Accordingly, we will make our
final determination no later than 135
days after the date of publication of this
preliminary determination.10
International Trade Commission
Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of
the Act, the Department will notify the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of
its preliminary determination. If the
final determination is affirmative, the
ITC will determine before the later of
120 days after the date of this
preliminary determination or 45 days
after the final determination whether
these imports are materially injuring, or
threaten material injury to, the U.S.
industry.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: December 18, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
China, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan—
Petitioners’ Request to Postpone the Antidumping
Duty Preliminary Determinations,’’ dated October
13, 2017.
10 See also 19 CFR 351.210(e).
Frm 00009
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
V. Postponement of Final Determination and
Extension of Provisional Measures
VI. Scope of the Investigation
VII. Scope Comments
VIII. Discussion of Methodology
Application of Adverse Facts Available
(AFA)
Corroboration of Secondary Information
All-Others Rate
Comparisons to Normal Value
A. Determination of the Comparison
Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
IX. Date of Sale
X. U.S. Price
XI. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability
B. Level of Trade
C. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison-Market Prices
D. Calculation of NV Based on CV
E. Cost of Production Analysis
1. Calculation of COP
2. Results of COP Test
XII. Currency Conversion
XIII. Verification
XIV. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–28257 Filed 1–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
`
investigation is fıne denier polyester staple
fiber (fine denier PSF), not carded, combed,
or pre-opened, measuring less than 3.3
decitex (3 denier) in diameter. The scope
covers all fine denier PSF, whether coated or
uncoated. The following products are
excluded from the scope:
(1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3 decitex
(more than 3 denier, inclusive) currently
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065.
(2) Low-melt PSF defined as a bicomponent polyester fiber having a polyester
fiber component that melts at a lower
temperature than the other polyester fiber
component, which is currently classifiable
under HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0015.
PO 00000
Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the
HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0025. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
investigation is dispositive.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Administration
[A–533–875]
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber
From India: Preliminary Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, Postponement of Final
Determination, and Extension of
Provisional Measures
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) preliminarily
determines that fine denier polyester
staple fiber (fine denier PSF) from India
is being, or is likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value
(LTFV). The period of investigation
(POI) is April 1, 2016, through March
31, 2017.
DATES: Applicable January 5, 2018.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 660-662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28257]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-893]
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,
Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional
Measures
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily
determines that fine denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF)
from the Republic of Korea (Korea) are being, or is likely to be sold
in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of
investigation (POI) is April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karine Gziryan or Celeste Chen, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4081 or (202) 482-0890,
respectively.
DATES: Applicable January 5, 2018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This preliminary determination is made in accordance with section
733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The Department
published the notice of initiation of this investigation on June 27,
2017.\1\ On October 24, 2017, the Department postponed the preliminary
determination of this investigation and the revised deadline is now
December 18, 2017.\2\ For a complete description of the events that
followed the initiation of this investigation, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.\3\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov,
and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's
Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigations, 82 FR 29023 (June 27, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
\2\ See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's
Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan:
Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigations, 82 FR 49178 (October 24, 2017).
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Determination in the Less-Than-Fair Value Investigation of Fine
Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is fine denier polyester
staple fiber from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of
this investigation, see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the preamble to the Department's regulations,\4\
the Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise
issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).\5\ Certain interested
parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in
the Initiation Notice. For a summary of the product coverage comments
and rebuttal responses submitted to the record for this preliminary
determination, and accompanying discussion and analysis of all comments
[[Page 661]]
timely received, see the Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum.\6\ The
Department is preliminarily modifying the scope language as it appeared
in the Initiation Notice. See the revised scope in Appendix I to this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties: Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
\5\ See Initiation Notice.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from
the Republic of Korea: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Determination'' (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum),
dated December 8, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with
section 731 of the Act. The Department has calculated export prices in
accordance with section 772(a) of the Act. Normal value (NV) is
calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. Furthermore,
pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, the Department has
preliminarily relied upon facts otherwise available, with adverse
inferences, for Huvis Corporation (Huvis) and Down Nara, Co. Ltd. (Down
Nara) which did not respond to the Department's questionnaire.\7\ For a
full description of the methodology underlying the preliminary
determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Toray Chemical Korea Inc. (TCK), Huvis, and Down Nara are
the mandatory respondents in this investigation. See Huvis
Corporation's Letter, ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the
Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent Not to Participate,'' dated
August 10, 2017 (Huvis Notice of Intent).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All-Others Rate
In accordance with section 735(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, the
Department determined weighted-average dumping margins for each of the
producers/exporters of the subject merchandise individually
investigated. Pursuant to sections 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) and 735(c)(5)(A) of
the Act, the Department shall determine an estimated all-others rate
for all exporters and producers not individually examined equal to the
weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers individually investigated,
excluding any zero and de minimis margins, and any margins determined
entirely under section 776 of the Act. Where the rates for the
individually investigated companies are all zero or de minimis, or
determined entirely using facts otherwise available, section
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act instructs the Department to establish ``any
reasonable method to establish the estimated all-others rate for
exporters and producers not individually investigated, including
averaging the estimated weighted average dumping margins determined for
the exporters and producers individually investigated.'' The Department
has preliminarily determined the estimated weighted-average dumping
margins for the two non-responsive companies, Huvis and Down Nara,
under section 776 of the Act and determined that the estimated
weighted-average dumping margin for TCK is zero. Pursuant to section
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, we calculated the ``all-others''' rate as a
simple average of the zero percent dumping margin and the two dumping
margins based totally on AFA. For a full description of the methodology
underlying the Department's analysis, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
weighted-
average
Exporter/producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toray Chemical Korea Inc................................... (*)
Huvis Corporation.......................................... 45.23
Down Nara, Co., Ltd........................................ 45.23
All-Others................................................. 30.15
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* de minimis.
Consistent with section 733(b)(3) of the Act, the Department
disregards de minimis rates and preliminarily determines that the
individually examined respondent with a de minimis rate did not sell
subject merchandise at LTFV.
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, the Department
will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend
liquidation of entries of subject merchandise, as described in Appendix
I, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
Further, pursuant to section 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.205(d), the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit
equal to the estimated weighted-average dumping margin or the estimated
all-others rate, as follows: (1) The cash deposit rate for the
respondents listed above will be equal to the company-specific
estimated weighted-average dumping margins determined in this
preliminary determination; (2) if the exporter is not a respondent
identified above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will
be equal to the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping
margin established for that producer of the subject merchandise, except
as explained below; and (3) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers and exporters will be equal to the all-others estimated
weighted-average dumping margin.
Because the estimated weighted-average dumping margin for TCK is
zero, entries of shipments of subject merchandise produced and exported
by TCK will not be subject to suspension of liquidation or cash deposit
requirements. In such situations, the Department applies the exclusion
to the provisional measures to the producer/exporter combination that
was examined in the investigation. Accordingly, the Department is
directing CBP not to suspend liquidation of entries of subject
merchandise produced and exported by TCK. Entries of shipments of
subject merchandise from TCK in any other producer/exporter
combination, or by third parties that sourced subject merchandise from
the excluded producer/exporter combination, are subject to the
provisional measures at the all others rate.
Should the final estimated weighted-average dumping margin be zero
or de minimis for subject merchandise exported and produced by TCK,
entries of shipments of subject merchandise from this producer/exporter
combination will be excluded from the potential antidumping duty order.
Such exclusions are not applicable to merchandise exported to the
United States by TCK in any other producer/exporter combinations or by
third parties that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded
producer/exporter combinations.
Disclosure
The Department intends to disclose its calculations and analysis
performed to interested parties in this preliminary determination
within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, the Department intends to
verify TCK 's information relied upon in making its final
determination.
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than seven
days after the date on which the final verification report is issued in
this proceeding, unless the Secretary alters
[[Page 662]]
the time limit. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case
briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline for
case briefs.\8\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties
who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this investigation are
encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general
filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, must submit a written request for a hearing to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, whether any participant is a foreign national,
and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is
made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department
of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a
time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the
date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled
date.
Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides that a final determination
may be postponed until not later than 135 days after the date of the
publication of the preliminary determination if, in the event of an
affirmative preliminary determination, a request for such postponement
is made by exporters who account for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise, or in the event of a negative
preliminary determination, a request for such postponement is made by
the petitioner. Section 351.210(e)(2) of the Department's regulations
requires that a request by exporters for postponement of the final
antidumping determination be accompanied by a request for extension of
provisional measures from a four-month period to a period not more than
six months in duration.
On November 13, 2017, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.210(e), TCK requested
that the Department postpone the final determination and that
provisional measures be extended to a period not to exceed six
months.\9\ In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii), because: (1) Our preliminary determination is
affirmative; (2) the requesting exporter accounts for a significant
proportion of exports of the subject merchandise; and (3) no compelling
reasons for denial exist, the Department is postponing the final
determination and extending the provisional measures from a four-month
period to a period not greater than six months. Accordingly, we will
make our final determination no later than 135 days after the date of
publication of this preliminary determination.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple
Fiber from India, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of
Korea, and Taiwan--Petitioners' Request to Postpone the Antidumping
Duty Preliminary Determinations,'' dated October 13, 2017.
\10\ See also 19 CFR 351.210(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, the Department will
notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its preliminary
determination. If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will
determine before the later of 120 days after the date of this
preliminary determination or 45 days after the final determination
whether these imports are materially injuring, or threaten material
injury to, the U.S. industry.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: December 18, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation is f[igrave]ne
denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF), not carded, combed,
or pre-opened, measuring less than 3.3 decitex (3 denier) in
diameter. The scope covers all fine denier PSF, whether coated or
uncoated. The following products are excluded from the scope:
(1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3 decitex (more than 3
denier, inclusive) currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 5503.20.0045 and
5503.20.0065.
(2) Low-melt PSF defined as a bi-component polyester fiber
having a polyester fiber component that melts at a lower temperature
than the other polyester fiber component, which is currently
classifiable under HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0015.
Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the HTSUS subheading
5503.20.0025. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
scope of this investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Postponement of Preliminary Determination
V. Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
VI. Scope of the Investigation
VII. Scope Comments
VIII. Discussion of Methodology
Application of Adverse Facts Available (AFA)
Corroboration of Secondary Information
All-Others Rate
Comparisons to Normal Value
A. Determination of the Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
IX. Date of Sale
X. U.S. Price
XI. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability
B. Level of Trade
C. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison-Market Prices
D. Calculation of NV Based on CV
E. Cost of Production Analysis
1. Calculation of COP
2. Results of COP Test
XII. Currency Conversion
XIII. Verification
XIV. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017-28257 Filed 1-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P