Supercalendered Paper From Canada: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 2015, 354-355 [2017-28198]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
354
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Notices
(a) German Institute for Standardization
(DIN) specifications DIN 2391–2, DIN 2393–
2, DIN 2394–2);
(b) European Standards (EN) EN 10305–1,
EN 10305–2, EN 10305–4, EN 10305–6 and
European national variations on those
standards (e.g., British Standard (BS EN),
Irish Standard (IS EN) and German Standard
(DIN EN) variations, etc.);
(c) Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) JIS G
3441 and JIS G 3445; and
(6) proprietary standards that are based on
one of the above-listed standards.
The subject cold-drawn mechanical tubing
may also be dual or multiple certified to
more than one standard. Pipe that is multiple
certified as cold-drawn mechanical tubing
and to other specifications not covered by
this scope, is also covered by the scope of
this investigation when it meets the physical
description set forth above.
Steel products included in the scope of this
investigation are products in which: (1) Iron
predominates, by weight, over each of the
other contained elements; and (2) the carbon
content is 2 percent or less by weight.
For purposes of this scope, the place of
cold-drawing determines the country of
origin of the subject merchandise. Subject
merchandise that is subject to minor working
in a third country that occurs after drawing
in one of the subject countries including, but
not limited to, heat treatment, cutting to
length, straightening, nondestructive testing,
deburring or chamfering, remains within the
scope of this investigation.
All products that meet the written physical
description are within the scope of this
investigation unless specifically excluded or
covered by the scope of an existing order.
Merchandise that meets the physical
description of cold-drawn mechanical tubing
above is within the scope of the investigation
even if it is also dual or multiple certified to
an otherwise excluded specification listed
below. The following products are outside of,
and/or specifically excluded from, the scope
of this investigation:
(1) Cold-drawn stainless steel tubing,
containing 10.5 percent or more of chromium
by weight and not more than 1.2 percent of
carbon by weight;
(2) products certified to one or more of the
ASTM, ASME or American Petroleum
Institute (API) specifications listed below:
• ASTM A–53;
• ASTM A–106;
• ASTM A–179 (ASME SA 179);
• ASTM A–192 (ASME SA 192);
• ASTM A–209 (ASME SA 209);
• ASTM A–210 (ASME SA 210);
• ASTM A–213 (ASME SA 213);
• ASTM A–334 (ASME SA 334);
• ASTM A–423 (ASME SA 423);
• ASTM A–498;
• ASTM A–496 (ASME SA 496);
• ASTM A–199;
• ASTM A–500;
• ASTM A–556;
• ASTM A–565;
• API 5L; and
• API 5CT
except that any cold-drawn tubing product
certified to one of the above excluded
specifications will not be excluded from the
scope if it is also dual- or multiple-certified
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
to any other specification that otherwise
would fall within the scope of this
investigation.
The products subject to the investigation
are currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
under item numbers: 7304.31.3000,
7304.31.6050, 7304.51.1000, 7304.51.5005,
7304.51.5060, 7306.30.5015, 7306.30.5020,
7306.50.5030. Subject merchandise may also
enter under numbers 7306.30.1000 and
7306.50.1000. The HTSUS subheadings
above are provided for convenience and
customs purposes only. The written
description of the scope of the investigation
is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2017–28403 Filed 1–2–18; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–122–854]
Supercalendered Paper From Canada:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission, in Part; 2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is conducting an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
supercalendered paper (SC paper) from
Canada. The period of review (POR) is
August 3, 2015, through December 31,
2015. We preliminarily determine that
Port Hawkesbury Paper LP (Port
Hawkesbury); Resolute FP Canada Inc.
and Resolute FP US Inc. (collectively,
Resolute); and Irving Paper Limited
(Irving) received countervailable
subsidies during the POR. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable January 3, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Czajkowski, Emily Halle, or
Aimee Phelan, Office I, AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1395, (202) 482–0176, and
(202) 482–0697, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On December 10, 2015, Commerce
issued a countervailing duty order on
SC paper from Canada.1 Several
1 See Supercalendered Paper From Canada:
Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 76668 (December
10, 2015) (CVD Order).
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is
SC paper. A full description of the scope
of the order is contained in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.3
Methodology
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
interested parties requested that
Commerce conduct an administrative
review of the CVD Order, and, on
February 13, 2017, Commerce published
in the Federal Register a notice of
initiation of an administrative review of
the CVD Order for four producers/
exporters for the POR.2
Sfmt 4703
Commerce is conducting this CVD
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For
each of the subsidy programs found
countervailable, we preliminarily
determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a
financial contribution by an ‘‘authority’’
that confers a benefit to the recipient,
and that the subsidy is specific.4 For a
full description of the methodology
underlying our preliminary conclusions,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum. The list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as an
Appendix to this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
We calculated a CVD rate for each
producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise for which an
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
10457 (February 13, 2017).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of Administrative Review of
the Countervailing Duty Order on Supercalendered
Paper from Canada; 2015,’’ dated concurrently with
this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Notices
administrative review was requested,
except as discussed below.
Partial Rescission of Administrative
Review
Commerce initiated an administrative
review of the CVD Order on February
13, 2017 for Catalyst Paper Corporation,
Catalyst Pulp and Paper Sales Inc., and
Catalyst Paper (USA) Inc. (collectively,
Catalyst). On April 24, 2017, we issued
the final results of the expedited review
of the CVD Order, in which we
determined a countervailable subsidy
rate for Catalyst that is de minimis.
Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.214(k)(3)(iv), we excluded Catalyst
from the CVD Order.5 On May 17, 2017,
Commerce issued a memorandum
stating our intention to rescind the
administrative review with respect to
Catalyst.6 Therefore, because Catalyst
has been excluded from the CVD Order,
we are rescinding the administrative
review with respect to Catalyst.
Preliminary Results of Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an
individual subsidy rate for Port
Hawkesbury, Resolute, and Irving. For
the POR, we preliminarily determine
that the following net subsidy rates for
the producers/exporters under review to
be as follows:
or rebuttal briefs are requested to submit
with the argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and, (3) a table of
authorities.10 Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.310(c), interested parties who wish
to request a hearing must do so within
30 days of publication of these
preliminary results by submitting a
written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, filed electronically using
ACCESS. Requests should contain the
party’s name, address, and telephone
number; the number of participants; and
a list of the issues to be discussed. If a
request for a hearing is made, we will
inform parties of the scheduled date for
the hearing which will be held at the
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230, at a time and location to be
determined. Parties should confirm by
telephone the date, time, and location of
the hearing two days before the
scheduled date.
Unless the deadline is extended
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act, Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of
issues raised in any written briefs,
within 120 days after the date of
publication of these preliminary results.
Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit
Company
Instructions
Upon completion of the
Port Hawkesbury Paper LP ..
15.65
administrative review, pursuant to
Resolute FP Canada Inc.,
and Resolute FP US Inc ...
1.79 section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce
Irving Paper Limited .............
5.13 shall determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate
Disclosure and Public Comment
entries covered by this review. We
Commerce will disclose to parties to
intend to issue assessment instructions
this proceeding the calculations
to CBP 15 days after publication of the
performed in connection with these
final results of this review.
preliminary results within five days of
Commerce also intends to instruct
7 Unless the
publication of this notice.
CBP to collect cash deposits of
Department changes the deadlines,
estimated countervailing duties in the
interested parties may submit case briefs
amounts indicated above for each
within seven days after the date on
company listed on shipments of subject
which the last verification report is
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
issued in this proceeding, and rebuttal
from warehouse, for consumption on or
briefs no later than five days after the
after the date of publication of the final
deadline for filing case briefs.8 Rebuttal
results of this administrative review. For
briefs must be limited to issues raised in
all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct
the case briefs.9 Parties who submit case
CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties at the
5 See Supercalendered Paper From Canada: Final
most recent company-specific or allResults of Countervailing Duty Expedited Review,
others rate applicable to the company,
82 FR 18896 (April 24, 2017) (Expedited Review)
and accompanying Issues and Decision
as appropriate. These cash deposit
Memorandum.
requirements, when imposed, shall
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Rescission of Catalyst Paper
remain in effect until further notice.
Corporation, Catalyst Pulp and Paper Sales Inc., and
As discussed above, Commerce is
Catalyst Paper (USA) Inc.,’’ May 17, 2017.
7 See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
rescinding the administrative review
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Subsidy rate
(percent)
8 See
9 See
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1).
19 CFR 351.309(d)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
10 See
PO 00000
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
355
with respect to Catalyst. As we
explained in the Expedited Review,
Commerce’s practice with respect to
exclusions of companies from a CVD
order is to exclude the subject
merchandise both produced and
exported by those companies.11 As a
result, we instructed CBP to discontinue
the suspension of liquidation and the
collection of cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties on all shipments
of SC paper produced and exported by
Catalyst, entered, or withdrawn, from
warehouse for consumption on or after
April 24, 2017.12 In addition, we
instructed CBP to liquidate, without
regard to countervailing duties, all
suspended entries of shipments of SC
paper produced and exported by
Catalyst, and to refund all cash deposits
of estimated countervailing duties
collected on all such shipments that
were suspended on or after August 3,
2015.13 Merchandise that Catalyst
exports but does not produce, as well as
merchandise Catalyst produces but is
exported by another company, remain
subject to countervailing duty order.14
This administrative review and notice
are in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213.
Dated: December 21, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Disclosure and Public Comment
VII. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2017–28198 Filed 1–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
11 See Expedited Review, 82 FR at 18897 (citing
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
India, Italy, Republic of Korea and the People’s
Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 81
FR 48387 (July 25, 2016)).
12 See CBP Message Number 7122301, dated May
2, 2017.
13 Id.
14 See Expedited Review, 82 FR at 18897.
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 354-355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28198]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-122-854]
Supercalendered Paper From Canada: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an
administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on
supercalendered paper (SC paper) from Canada. The period of review
(POR) is August 3, 2015, through December 31, 2015. We preliminarily
determine that Port Hawkesbury Paper LP (Port Hawkesbury); Resolute FP
Canada Inc. and Resolute FP US Inc. (collectively, Resolute); and
Irving Paper Limited (Irving) received countervailable subsidies during
the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable January 3, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Czajkowski, Emily Halle, or
Aimee Phelan, Office I, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1395, (202) 482-0176, and (202) 482-0697, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 10, 2015, Commerce issued a countervailing duty order
on SC paper from Canada.\1\ Several interested parties requested that
Commerce conduct an administrative review of the CVD Order, and, on
February 13, 2017, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice
of initiation of an administrative review of the CVD Order for four
producers/exporters for the POR.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Supercalendered Paper From Canada: Countervailing Duty
Order, 80 FR 76668 (December 10, 2015) (CVD Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 10457 (February 13, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is SC paper. A full description
of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on
Supercalendered Paper from Canada; 2015,'' dated concurrently with
this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this CVD administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we
preliminarily determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial
contribution by an ``authority'' that confers a benefit to the
recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\4\ For a full description
of the methodology underlying our preliminary conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The list of topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an Appendix to this
notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and
is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of
the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We calculated a CVD rate for each producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise for which an
[[Page 355]]
administrative review was requested, except as discussed below.
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
Commerce initiated an administrative review of the CVD Order on
February 13, 2017 for Catalyst Paper Corporation, Catalyst Pulp and
Paper Sales Inc., and Catalyst Paper (USA) Inc. (collectively,
Catalyst). On April 24, 2017, we issued the final results of the
expedited review of the CVD Order, in which we determined a
countervailable subsidy rate for Catalyst that is de minimis.
Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(k)(3)(iv), we excluded Catalyst
from the CVD Order.\5\ On May 17, 2017, Commerce issued a memorandum
stating our intention to rescind the administrative review with respect
to Catalyst.\6\ Therefore, because Catalyst has been excluded from the
CVD Order, we are rescinding the administrative review with respect to
Catalyst.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Supercalendered Paper From Canada: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Expedited Review, 82 FR 18896 (April 24, 2017)
(Expedited Review) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Rescission of Catalyst Paper Corporation,
Catalyst Pulp and Paper Sales Inc., and Catalyst Paper (USA) Inc.,''
May 17, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an
individual subsidy rate for Port Hawkesbury, Resolute, and Irving. For
the POR, we preliminarily determine that the following net subsidy
rates for the producers/exporters under review to be as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Company (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Port Hawkesbury Paper LP................................ 15.65
Resolute FP Canada Inc., and Resolute FP US Inc......... 1.79
Irving Paper Limited.................................... 5.13
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
Commerce will disclose to parties to this proceeding the
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results
within five days of publication of this notice.\7\ Unless the
Department changes the deadlines, interested parties may submit case
briefs within seven days after the date on which the last verification
report is issued in this proceeding, and rebuttal briefs no later than
five days after the deadline for filing case briefs.\8\ Rebuttal briefs
must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs.\9\ Parties who
submit case or rebuttal briefs are requested to submit with the
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and, (3) a table of authorities.\10\ Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must do so
within 30 days of publication of these preliminary results by
submitting a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically using
ACCESS. Requests should contain the party's name, address, and
telephone number; the number of participants; and a list of the issues
to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we will inform
parties of the scheduled date for the hearing which will be held at the
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined. Parties should
confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two
days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1).
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2).
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act, Commerce intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues
raised in any written briefs, within 120 days after the date of
publication of these preliminary results.
Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit Instructions
Upon completion of the administrative review, pursuant to section
751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review. We intend to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final
results of this review.
Commerce also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties in the amounts indicated above for each
company listed on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this administrative review. For all
non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or
all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
As discussed above, Commerce is rescinding the administrative
review with respect to Catalyst. As we explained in the Expedited
Review, Commerce's practice with respect to exclusions of companies
from a CVD order is to exclude the subject merchandise both produced
and exported by those companies.\11\ As a result, we instructed CBP to
discontinue the suspension of liquidation and the collection of cash
deposits of estimated countervailing duties on all shipments of SC
paper produced and exported by Catalyst, entered, or withdrawn, from
warehouse for consumption on or after April 24, 2017.\12\ In addition,
we instructed CBP to liquidate, without regard to countervailing
duties, all suspended entries of shipments of SC paper produced and
exported by Catalyst, and to refund all cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties collected on all such shipments that were
suspended on or after August 3, 2015.\13\ Merchandise that Catalyst
exports but does not produce, as well as merchandise Catalyst produces
but is exported by another company, remain subject to countervailing
duty order.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Expedited Review, 82 FR at 18897 (citing Certain
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, Republic of
Korea and the People's Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order,
81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016)).
\12\ See CBP Message Number 7122301, dated May 2, 2017.
\13\ Id.
\14\ See Expedited Review, 82 FR at 18897.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This administrative review and notice are in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.
Dated: December 21, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Disclosure and Public Comment
VII. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2017-28198 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
