Freedom of Information Act Regulations, 291-302 [2017-27967]
Download as PDF
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
from the requirements of this Part if the
total contractual obligation exceeds the
threshold amount in effect at the time of
consummation. See comment 2(e)–9.
Accordingly, § 213.7 does not apply to
an advertisement for a specific
consumer lease if the total contractual
obligation for that lease exceeds the
threshold amount in effect when the
advertisement is made. If a lessor
promotes multiple consumer leases in a
single advertisement, the entire
advertisement must comply with § 213.7
unless all of the advertised leases are
exempt under § 213.2(e). For example
i. Assume that, in an advertisement, a
lessor states that certain terms apply to
a consumer lease for a specific
automobile. The total contractual
obligation of the advertised lease
exceeds the threshold amount in effect
when the advertisement is made.
Although the advertisement does not
refer to any other lease, some or all of
the advertised terms for the exempt
lease also apply to other leases offered
by the lessor with total contractual
obligations that do not exceed the
applicable threshold amount. The
advertisement is not required to comply
with § 213.7 because it refers only to an
exempt lease.
ii. Assume that, in an advertisement,
a lessor states certain terms (such as the
amount due at lease signing) that will
apply to consumer leases for
automobiles of a particular brand.
However, the advertisement does not
refer to a specific lease. The total
contractual obligations of the leases for
some of the automobiles will exceed the
threshold amount in effect when the
advertisement is made, but the total
contractual obligations of the leases for
other automobiles will not exceed the
threshold. The entire advertisement
must comply with § 213.7 because it
refers to terms for consumer leases that
are not exempt.
iii. Assume that, in a single
advertisement, a lessor states that
certain terms apply to consumer leases
for two different automobiles. The total
contractual obligation of the lease for
the first automobile exceeds the
threshold amount in effect when the
advertisement is made, but the total
contractual obligation of the lease for
the second automobile does not exceed
the threshold. The entire advertisement
must comply with § 213.7 because it
refers to a consumer lease that is not
exempt.
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix A—Model Forms
1. Permissible changes. Although use
of the model forms is not required,
lessors using them properly will be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
deemed to be in compliance with the
regulation. Generally, lessors may make
certain changes in the format or content
of the forms and may delete any
disclosures that are inapplicable to a
transaction without losing the act’s
protection from liability. For example,
the model form based on monthly
periodic payments may be modified for
single-payment lease transactions or for
quarterly or other regular or irregular
periodic payments. The model form
may also be modified to reflect that a
transaction is an extension. The content,
format, and headings for the segregated
disclosures must be substantially
similar to those contained in the model
forms; therefore, any changes should be
minimal. The changes to the model
forms should not be so extensive as to
affect the substance and the clarity of
the disclosures.
2. Examples of acceptable changes.
i. Using the first person, instead of the
second person, in referring to the lessee.
ii. Using ‘‘lessee,’’ ‘‘lessor,’’ or names
instead of pronouns.
iii. Rearranging the sequence of the
nonsegregated disclosures.
iv. Incorporating certain state ‘‘plain
English’’ requirements.
v. Deleting or blocking out
inapplicable disclosures, filling in ‘‘N/
A’’ (not applicable) or ‘‘0,’’ crossing out,
leaving blanks, checking a box for
applicable items, or circling applicable
items (this should facilitate use of
multipurpose standard forms).
vi. Adding language or symbols to
indicate estimates.
vii. Adding numeric or alphabetic
designations.
viii. Rearranging the disclosures into
vertical columns, except for § 213.4(b)
through (e) disclosures.
ix. Using icons and other graphics.
3. Model closed-end or net vehicle
lease disclosure. Model A–2 is designed
for a closed-end or net vehicle lease.
Under the ‘‘Early Termination and
Default’’ provision a reference to the
lessee’s right to an independent
appraisal of the leased vehicle under
§ 213.4(l) is included for those closedend leases in which the lessee’s liability
at early termination is based on the
vehicle’s realized value.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017–27325 Filed 1–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
291
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 200
[Release Nos. 34–82373; FOIA–192; File No.
S7–09–17]
RIN 3235–AM25
Freedom of Information Act
Regulations
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’)
is publishing for comment proposed
amendments to the Commission’s
regulations under the Freedom of
Information Act (‘‘FOIA’’). This rule
proposes revisions to the Commission’s
regulations under the FOIA to reflect
changes required by the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016
(‘‘Improvement Act’’); and clarify,
update, and streamline the language of
several procedural provisions.
DATES: Comments should be received by
February 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form located at https://
www.sec.gov/rules/proposed.shtml;
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov, including File Number S7–09–
17 on the subject line; or
• Use the Federal eRulemaking Portal
located at https://www.regulations.gov,
following the instructions for submitting
comments.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments to Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number S7–09–17. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if email is used. To help us process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s internet website
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/
proposed.shtml). Comments are also
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington DC 20549, on official
working days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. All comments
received will be posted without change.
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
292
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. Studies,
memoranda, or other substantive items
may be added by the Commission or
staff to the comment file during this
rulemaking. A notification of the
inclusion in the comment file of any
such materials will be made available
on the Commission’s website. To ensure
direct electronic receipt of such
notifications, sign up through the ‘‘Stay
Connected’’ option at www.sec.gov to
receive notifications by email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Tallarico, Senior Counsel, Office
of the General Counsel, (202) 551–5132;
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–5041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Commission is proposing
revisions to its regulations under the
FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552. As required by the
Improvement Act, Public Law 114–185,
130 Stat. 538, the Commission has
reviewed its FOIA regulations to
identify any changes that are necessary
to conform its regulations to the
Improvement Act. In connection with
that review, the Commission has
identified both changes necessitated by
the Improvement Act and other areas
where it would be beneficial to clarify,
update, and streamline the language of
several procedural provisions. Due to
the scope of the proposed revisions, the
proposed rule would replace the
Commission’s current FOIA regulations
in their entirety (17 CFR 200.80 through
200.80f).
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
A. Changes To Conform to the
Improvement Act
The Commission is proposing four
changes to the Commission’s FOIA
regulations to conform them to the
Improvement Act. First, the proposed
rule revises Section 200.80(a) to provide
that records the FOIA requires to be
made available for public inspection
will be available in electronic format.
Second, the proposed rule revises
Section 200.80(c) to provide that a
request for records may be denied to the
extent the exemptions in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)
apply to the requested records and
Commission staff reasonably foresees
that disclosure would harm an interest
protected by the applicable exemption,
the disclosure of the requested records
is prohibited by law, or the requested
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
records are otherwise exempted from
disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3).
Third, the proposed rule revises the
regulations to state that FOIA requesters
may seek assistance from the Office of
FOIA Services’ FOIA Public Liaisons
(Sections 200.80(b), (d), and (e)) and to
advise FOIA requesters of their right to
seek dispute resolution services offered
by the Office of Government
Information Services in the case of a
denied request (Section 200.80(e)).
Fourth, the proposed rule revises
Section 200.80(g) to incorporate the
amendments to the FOIA requiring
agencies to waive fees, under certain
circumstances, if they do not comply
with the time limits under the FOIA.
B. Proposed Amendments To Update,
Clarify, and Streamline the FOIA
Regulations
The remaining proposed changes are
to certain procedural provisions. Those
changes clarify, update, and streamline
the Commission’s regulations, and most
of the changes make the regulations
consistent with existing practices. The
proposed regulations, among other
things, update the various methods for
submitting FOIA requests and
administrative appeals (Sections
200.80(b) and (f)); describe certain
information that is required when
submitting requests for records about
oneself or another individual (Section
200.80(b)); explain the situations in
which the Office of FOIA Services staff
will work with other Federal agencies
that have an interest in agency records
that may be responsive to a request
(Section 200.80(c)); incorporate
language that allows the Office of FOIA
Services to seek a one-time clarification
of an ambiguous request and toll the
time period for responding to the
request until the requester clarifies the
request (Section 200.80(c)); clarify when
the 20-day statutory time limit for
responding to requests begins (i.e.,
when requests are received by the Office
of FOIA Services and when requests are
modified so that they reasonably
describe the records sought) (Section
200.80(d)); clarify the Office of FOIA
Services’ system for multi-track
processing of requests (Section
200.80(d)); and enable the Office of
FOIA Services to aggregate requests
involving related matters where it
appears that multiple requests together
constitute a single request that would
involve unusual circumstances (Section
200.80(d)).
Two of the procedural changes
impose possible burdens on requesters.
First, requesters must include their full
names and return addresses in their
request (Section 200.80(b)). Second, the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Office of FOIA Services may aggregate
related requests from one requester (or
a group of requesters), and that
aggregation may permit the Office of
FOIA Services to extend deadlines for
processing the request or place the
request in a queue for complex requests.
Other procedural changes provide more
flexibility to requesters. For example,
the proposed rule provides that
administrative appeals need only be
sent to the Office of FOIA Services (no
longer requiring appeals to be sent to
both the Office of FOIA Services and the
Office of the General Counsel) (Section
200.80(f)).
The proposed rule also clarifies,
consistent with existing practice, that
the Office of FOIA Services will close
requests if requesters do not take certain
steps within set time periods. For
example, requesters must respond to the
Office of FOIA Services’ one-time
clarification request within 30 calendar
days (Section 200.80(d)); agree to pay
anticipated fees within 30 calendar days
of the Office of FOIA Services’ fee
estimate (Section 200.80(g)); and, when
required to do so, make an advance
payment within 30 calendar days of the
Office of FOIA Services’ fee notice
(Section 200.80(g)).
C. Proposed Revisions to Fee Provisions
The proposed rule also revises the
Office of FOIA Services’ fee procedures
and fee schedule in Section 200.80(g).
Two of the revisions could change
current practices. First, the proposed
rule allows the Office of FOIA Services
to collect fees before sending records to
a requester instead of seeking payment
when the records are sent. Second, the
proposed rule removes from the rule the
set duplication fee of 24 cents per page
and instead refers requesters to the
FOIA fee page on the Commission’s
website, where the current fee will be
posted.1 The duplication fee posted on
the website will reflect the direct costs
of photocopying or producing a
printout, taking into account various
factors including the salary of the
employee(s) performing the work and
the cost of materials. The duplication
fee posted on the Commission’s website
will be adjusted as appropriate to reflect
current costs. Eliminating the set
duplication fee will allow the Office of
FOIA Services to align its photocopying
and printout fees with the actual costs
of duplicating records for production to
requesters (in paper format) without
having to amend the regulations.
1 The Commission anticipates that the initial
posted fee will be 15 cents per page, and the
Commission is already charging this lower cost.
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
The proposed rule also codifies
several existing practices. For example,
it states that fees for duplicating records
onto electronic medium (including the
costs associated with scanning
materials, where applicable) will be the
direct costs of duplicating records for
requesters; clarifies that the Office of
FOIA Services will not process any
requests once it determines that a fee
may be charged unless the requester
commits to pay the estimated fees; adds
and clarifies fee-related definitions;
clarifies the direct costs that can be
charged by the Office of FOIA Services
as part of search, review, and
duplication fees; and sets forth the
various methods by which FOIA
processing fees can be paid.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Proposed Elimination of Certain
Provisions
The proposed rule eliminates certain
provisions in the Commission’s current
FOIA regulations that repeat
information contained in the FOIA
statute and do not need to be in the
Commission’s regulations. Among the
provisions that the Commission is
proposing to remove are: (1) The list of
information the FOIA requires the
Commission to publish in the Federal
Register (Section 200.80(a)(1) of the
current regulations), (2) the categories of
records the FOIA requires the
Commission to make available for
public inspection (Section 200.80(a)(2)
of the current regulations), and (3) the
nine categories of records that are
exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C.
552(b) (Section 200.80(b) of the current
regulations). Finally, the Commission is
proposing to eliminate Appendices A
through F. Appendices A through D and
F provide general information that is
available on the Commission’s website
to the extent it is relevant to the public.
The information in Appendix E is
revised and updated and moved to
Section 200.80(g) (Fees) of the proposed
regulations.
E. Structure of the Proposed Rule
The structure of the regulations will
be revised accordingly: Section
200.80(a) (General provisions); Section
200.80(b) (Requirements for making
requests); Section 200.80(c) (Processing
requests); Section 200.80(d) (Time limits
and expedited processing); Section
200.80(e) (Responses to requests);
Section 200.80(f) (Administrative
appeals); and Section 200.80(g) (Fees).
III. General Request for Comments
We request and encourage any
interested person to submit comments
on any aspect of the proposals, other
matters that might have an impact on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
the proposals, and suggestions for
additional changes. We note that
comments are of particular assistance to
us if accompanied by analysis of the
issues addressed in those comments and
any data that may support the analysis.
We urge commenters to be as specific as
possible.
IV. Economic Analysis
The Commission is sensitive to the
economic effects, including the costs
and benefits, that result from its rules.
Section 23(a)(2) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’)
requires the Commission, in making
rules pursuant to any provision of the
Exchange Act, to consider among other
matters the impact any such rule would
have on competition and prohibits any
rule that would impose a burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Exchange Act.2 Further,
Section 3(f) of the Exchange Act
requires the Commission, when
engaging in rulemaking where it is
required to consider or determine
whether an action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, to
consider, in addition to the protection of
investors, whether the action will
promote efficiency, competition, and
capital formation.3 As discussed further
below, the Commission preliminarily
believes that the economic effects of the
proposed amendments would be
limited. The Commission notes that,
where possible, it has attempted to
quantify the costs, benefits, and effects
on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation expected to result from the
proposed amendments. In some cases,
however, the Commission is unable to
quantify the economic effects because it
lacks the information necessary to
provide a reasonable estimate.
Additionally, some of the potential
benefits of the amendments are
inherently difficult to quantify.
The proposed revisions fall into four
categories. First, as discussed in more
detail above, the Commission is
proposing amendments to its
regulations to conform the regulations to
the Improvement Act. Consistent with
the Improvement Act, the proposed rule
provides: (1) Records required to be
made available pursuant to the FOIA
will be made available in electronic
format; (2) records will be withheld
under the exemptions in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)
only if Commission staff reasonably
foresees that disclosure would harm an
interest protected by the applicable
exemption or disclosure is prohibited by
2 15
3 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78w(a).
U.S.C. 78c(f).
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
293
law; (3) FOIA requesters may seek
assistance from the Office of FOIA
Services’ FOIA Public Liaisons and will
be advised that they have the right to
seek dispute resolution services from
the Office of Government Information
Services if their request is denied; and
(4) the Office of FOIA Services is
required to waive fees, in certain
circumstances, if it does not comply
with the time limits under the FOIA.
The Commission believes that these
changes would have minimal impact on
FOIA requesters because they largely
codify the Commission’s existing
practices. To the extent the amendments
result in these practices being followed
more consistently, they could benefit
the public by increasing the amount of
information available, making more
information available in an electronic
format, and ensuring that requesters
know of their right to seek alternative
dispute resolution. The Commission
also believes that the public could
benefit from the increased transparency
regarding these practices. The
Commission does not expect these
proposed amendments to result in
additional costs to any member of the
public.
Second, the Commission is proposing
amendments to procedural provisions,
which are intended to better reflect and
improve existing practice. Most of these
changes codify existing Office of FOIA
Services practice, including: (1) Adding
to the regulation additional methods for
submitting FOIA requests and
administrative appeals; (2) clarifying the
existing procedures for submitting
requests for records about oneself or
another individual; (3) clarifying the
existing procedures for submitting a
proper FOIA request and seeking
clarification of a request; (4) clarifying
existing procedures for submitting an
administrative appeal; and (5) clarifying
the existing practice that limits
administrative appeals to written filings
(i.e., there is no opportunity for personal
appearance, oral argument, or hearing
on appeal). The Commission does not
expect these changes to result in
additional costs to any member of the
public. The Commission also expects
that there would be some benefit to
FOIA requesters from the increased
transparency regarding these practices.
Two proposed procedural changes
could affect members of the public.
First, FOIA requesters will be required
to include their full names and
addresses in their requests. Providing a
full name and address is not itself
burdensome, but some requesters may
prefer to remain anonymous and could
be deterred from submitting FOIA
requests by this requirement. However,
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
294
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
because nearly all FOIA requesters
provide this information already, the
Commission expects that the economic
impact of the amendment will be
minimal. Second, the Office of FOIA
Services will be able to aggregate related
requests from one requester (or a group
of requesters). The Office of FOIA
Services could aggregate requests that
on their own do not involve ‘‘unusual
circumstances,’’ as defined in the
proposed regulations, or warrant
placement in a track for complex
requests, so aggregation may lead to
extended deadlines for processing a
request or cause a request to be handled
after other complex requests. Based on
past experience, the Commission
expects that few requests will be
aggregated. In addition, if the
aggregation of requests results in the
requests being placed in a track for
complex requests that could extend the
processing time, the requester could
modify the request so that it can be
processed more quickly. Thus, the
Commission expects that the impact of
this amendment also will be minimal.
Third, the Commission is proposing
to revise the Office of FOIA Services’ fee
procedures and fee schedule in several
ways, including: (1) Eliminating from
the rule the per page duplication fee for
copying or printing requested records,
and instead referring requesters to the
FOIA fee page on the Commission’s
website; (2) allowing the Office of FOIA
Services to collect fees before sending
records to a requester instead of seeking
payment when the records are sent; (3)
clarifying the direct costs that can be
charged by the Office of FOIA Services
as part of its search, review, and
duplication fees; and (4) codifying the
existing Office of FOIA Services practice
of charging requesters the actual cost of
production for materials produced in an
electronic format. In general, lowering
fees associated with FOIA requests
could encourage additional FOIA
submissions, while raising fees could
deter them. However, as discussed
below, the Commission does not
anticipate that any of its proposed
changes to the Office of FOIA Services’
fee procedures would impose significant
new costs on FOIA requesters.
With respect to the elimination of the
set per page duplication fee, the
Commission anticipates that the initial
posted fee will be 15 cents per page, and
the Office of FOIA Services has already
lowered its per page duplication fee
from 24 cents to 15 cents to reflect its
actual duplication costs. Even if the
Office of FOIA Services were to increase
the per page duplication fee in the
future, the impact of any increase would
likely be minimal. Information about the
fees the Commission has collected for
FOIA requests for the past six years
serves as a baseline from which the
Commission can estimate the economic
effects of this proposed change. Table 1
shows the number of requests received
and processed by the Commission
during fiscal years 2011 through 2016
and the fees the Commission collected.
The fees collected by the Commission
for processing FOIA requests include
charges for staff time associated with
locating, reviewing, and copying
responsive documents. The Commission
collects fees for duplication of 24 cents
per page for paper copies and the costs
of production for other types of media.
The fee schedule for FOIA requests is
available on the Commission’s website.
TABLE 1—FOIA REQUESTS IN FISCAL YEARS 2011 TO 2016
Requests
received
Fiscal year
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
As shown in Table 1, from fiscal year
2011–2016, the Office of FOIA Services
collected an average of $37,521.30 per
year in fees for processing an average of
13,532 requests. These amounts
correspond to an average fee of $2.77
collected per request processed.4 Even if
all of those fees were for duplication
(which they were not), a one cent per
page increase in duplication fees would
result in an increase in total fees
collected of approximately $1,563.39,5
corresponding to an average fee of $2.89
collected per request processed.6
With respect to the amendment
providing that the FOIA Office can
4 Calculated
as $37,521.30/13,532 = $2.77.
arrive at this estimated increase, we divide
$37,521.30 in duplication fees by a cost of $0.24 per
page to derive an estimate of approximately 156,339
pages of copies on average per fiscal year. 156,339
pages × $0.01 increase in per-page duplication fees
= $1,563.39 in additional total processing fees.
6 Calculated as ($37,521.30 + $1,563.39)/13,532 =
$2.89.
5 To
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
collect fees before sending records to a
requester (instead of seeking payment
when the records are sent), the
Commission expects that any additional
cost will be limited to a slight delay in
receiving documents. The timing of the
collection would not itself impose any
additional costs on FOIA requesters
because the timing would not alter the
amount of fees charged. Any delay in
receiving the documents would not be
significant because a FOIA requester
could make an electronic payment upon
receipt of the request for payment, and
the Office of FOIA Services would then
provide the documents. The
Commission notes that some requesters
may choose to forego receiving the
records in question if the fees are
substantial, though even this impact
may be muted because requesters would
have been advised of and approved
potential charges before requests are
processed by the FOIA Office.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11,555
11,292
12,275
14,862
16,898
14,458
Requests
processed
11,562
11,302
12,167
14,757
16,207
15,196
Fees collected
for processing
requests
$78,005.94
27,577.00
35,954.30
22,670.81
19,890.07
41,029.68
The proposed clarification regarding
direct costs and codification of existing
practice with respect to fees for
materials produced in an electronic
format are consistent with existing
practice, and the Commission therefore
does not expect these amendments to
impose any additional burden on the
public. The other proposed changes to
the Office of FOIA Services’ fee
procedures also codify existing
processes and will therefore not impose
any additional burden on requesters.
These proposed changes include: (1)
Clarifying that the Office of FOIA
Services will not process any requests
once it determines that a fee may be
charged unless the requester commits to
pay the estimated fees; and (2) adding
and clarifying certain fee-related
definitions. The Commission does not
expect these amendments to result in
additional costs to any member of the
public. To the contrary, the Commission
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
believes that the public could benefit
from the increased transparency
regarding these practices.
Finally, the Commission is proposing
to eliminate certain provisions in its
FOIA regulations that are restatements
of provisions in the FOIA statute. The
Commission does not expect these
amendments to result in any economic
effects, as the elimination of these
redundant provisions would not have
any substantive consequence.
The Commission believes that the
proposed amendments would not have
any significant impact on efficiency,
competition, or capital formation. The
Commission requests comment on all
aspects of the benefits and costs of the
proposal, including any anticipated
impacts on efficiency, competition, or
capital formation.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Certification
Section 3(a) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (‘‘RFA’’) requires
the Commission to undertake an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis of the
effect of the proposed rule amendments
on small entities unless the Commission
certifies that the proposal, if adopted,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. As discussed above, most of the
proposed changes are procedural. Many
of the changes codify existing practices
and are therefore unlikely to have any
economic impact on requesters. With
respect to the changes to the fee
schedule, under the FOIA, agencies may
recover only the direct costs of
searching for, reviewing, and
duplicating the records processed for
requesters. These fees are typically
nominal, and the proposed changes to
the fees are therefore similarly nominal
and would not have a significant
economic impact on a FOIA requester,
even a small entity. In accordance with
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(b)), the Commission certifies that
the proposed amendments to the FOIA
regulations, if adopted, would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The Commission requests comment
regarding the appropriateness of its
certification.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule would not impose
any new ‘‘collection of information’’
requirement as defined by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.; nor
would it create any new filing,
reporting, recordkeeping, or disclosure
reporting requirements. Accordingly, we
are not submitting the proposed rule to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
295
the Office of Management and Budget
for review under the PRA.7 We request
comment on whether our conclusion
that there are no new collections of
information is correct.
Section 200.82 also issued under 15 U.S.C.
78n.
Section 200.83 also issued under E.O.
12600, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 235.
VII. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
§ 200.80 Securities and Exchange
Commission records and information.
Under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, a rule
is considered ‘‘major’’ where, if
adopted, it results or is likely to result
in: (i) An annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more (either in the
form of an increase or a decrease); (ii)
a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers or individual industries; or
(iii) significant adverse effect on
competition, investment, or
innovation.8 We request comment on
the potential impact of the proposed
rule on the economy on an annual basis,
any potential increase in costs or prices
for consumers or individual industries,
and any potential effect on competition,
investment, or innovation. Commenters
are requested to provide empirical data
and other factual support for their view
to the extent possible.
VIII. Statutory Authority and Text of
Proposed Rule Amendments
The amendments contained herein are
being proposed under the authority set
forth in Public Law 114–185 § 3(a), 130
Stat. 538; 5 U.S.C. 552; 15 U.S.C. 77f(d),
77s, 77ggg(a), 78d–1, 78w(a), 80a–37(a),
80a–44(b), 80b–10(a), and 80b–11(a).
List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 200
Administrative practice and
procedure; Freedom of information.
Text of Proposed Amendments
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Commission proposes to
amend 17 CFR part 200 as follows:
PART 200—ORGANIZATION;
CONDUCT AND ETHICS; AND
INFORMATION AND REQUESTS
Subpart D—Information and Requests
1. The authority citation for subpart D
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 77f(d), 77s, 77ggg(a), 77sss, 78m(F)(3),
78w, 80a–37, 80a–44(a), 80a–44(b), 80b–
10(a), and 80b–11, unless otherwise noted.
Section 200.80 also issued under Public
Law 114–185 sec. 3(a), 130 Stat. 538; 5 U.S.C.
552; 15 U.S.C. 77f(d), 77s, 77ggg(a), 78d–1,
78w(a), 80a–37(a), 80a–44(b), 80b–10(a), and
80b–11(a), unless otherwise noted.
7 44
U.S.C. 3507(d) and 5 CFR 1320.11.
Law 104–121, 110 Stat. 857 (1996)
(codified in various sections of 5 U.S.C., 15 U.S.C.
and as a note to 5 U.S.C. 601).
8 Public
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
■
2. Revise § 200.80 to read as follows:
(a) General provisions. (1) This
section contains the rules that the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
follows in processing requests for
records under the Freedom of
Information Act (‘‘FOIA’’), 5 U.S.C. 552,
as amended. These rules should be read
in conjunction with the text of the FOIA
and the Uniform Freedom of
Information Fee Schedule and
Guidelines published by the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB
Guidelines’’). Requests made by
individuals for records about
themselves under the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed in
accordance with the Commission’s
Privacy Act regulations at subpart H, as
well as this section.
(2) Proactive disclosure of Agency
records. (i) Records that the FOIA
requires to be made available for public
inspection in an electronic format
(pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2)) are
accessible through the Commission’s
website, https://www.sec.gov. Each
division and office of the Commission is
responsible for determining which of its
records are required to be made publicly
available in an electronic format, as well
as identifying additional records of
interest to the public that are
appropriate for public disclosure, and
for posting and indexing such records.
Each division and office shall ensure
that its posted records and indexes are
reviewed and updated on an ongoing
basis.
(ii) Those who do not have access to
the internet may obtain these records by
contacting the Commission’s Office of
FOIA Services by telephone at 202–551–
7900, by email at foiapa@sec.gov, or by
visiting the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–2736, on official
working days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
(b) Requirements for making requests
for records— (1) How made and
addressed. The Commission has a
centralized system for responding to
FOIA requests, with all requests
processed by the Office of FOIA
Services. Requests for agency records
must be in writing and include the
requester’s full name and a legible
return address. Requesters may also
include other contact information, such
as an email address and a telephone
number. Requests may be submitted by
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
296
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
U.S. mail or delivery service and
addressed to the Freedom of
Information Act Officer, SEC, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.
Requests may also be made by facsimile
(202–772–9337), email (foiapa@sec.gov),
or online at the Commission’s website
(https://www.sec.gov). The request (and
envelope, if the request is mailed or
hand-delivered) should be marked
‘‘Freedom of Information Act Request.’’
(2) Requests for records about oneself
or another individual. (i) A requester
who is making a request for records
about himself or herself must comply
with the verification of identity
provisions set forth in subpart H of this
part to obtain any documents that
would not be available to the public
under the FOIA.
(ii) For requests for records about
another individual, a requester may
receive greater access by submitting
either a notarized authorization signed
by the individual permitting disclosure
of his or her records or proof that the
individual is deceased (e.g., a copy of a
death certificate or an obituary). The
Office of FOIA Services can require a
requester to supply additional
information if necessary to verify that a
particular individual has consented to
disclosure.
(3) Description of records sought. A
FOIA request must reasonably describe
the agency records sought with
sufficient specificity with respect to
names, dates, and subject matter to
enable personnel within the divisions
and offices of the Commission to locate
them with a reasonable effort. Before
submitting a request, a requester may
contact the Office of FOIA Services’
FOIA Public Liaisons to discuss the
records they are seeking and to receive
assistance in describing the records
(contact information for these
individuals is on the Commission’s
website, https://www.sec.gov). If the
Office of FOIA Services determines that
a request does not reasonably describe
the records sought, it shall inform the
requester what additional information is
needed or how the request is
insufficient. A requester who is
attempting to reformulate or modify
such a request may discuss the request
with the Office of FOIA Services’
designated FOIA contact, its FOIA
Public Liaisons, or a representative of
the Office of FOIA Services, each of
whom is available to assist the requester
in reasonably describing the records
sought. When a requester fails to
provide sufficient information within 30
calendar days after having been asked to
reasonably describe the records sought,
the Office of FOIA Services shall notify
the requester in writing that the request
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
has not been properly made, that no
further action will be taken, and that the
FOIA request is closed. Such a notice
constitutes an adverse determination
under paragraph (e)(2) of this section for
which the Office of FOIA Services shall
follow the procedures for a denial letter
under paragraph (e)(2) of this section. In
cases where a requester has modified
his or her request so that it reasonably
describes the requested records, the date
of receipt for purposes of the 20-day
time limit of paragraph (d) of this
section shall be the date of receipt of the
modified request.
(c) Processing requests—(1) In
general. (i) A request for records may be
denied to the extent the exemptions in
5 U.S.C. 552(b) apply to the requested
records and:
(A) Commission staff reasonably
foresees that disclosure would harm an
interest protected by the applicable
exemption; or
(B) The disclosure of the requested
records is prohibited by law or is
exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(3).
(ii) In determining which records are
responsive to a request, the Office of
FOIA Services ordinarily will include
only records in the agency’s possession
as of the date that it begins its search.
(2) Re-routing of misdirected requests.
Any division or office within the
Commission that receives a written
request for records should promptly
forward the request to the Office of
FOIA Services for processing.
(3) Consultation, referral, and
coordination. When reviewing records
located in response to a request, the
Office of FOIA Services will determine
whether another Federal agency is better
able to determine if the record is exempt
from disclosure under the FOIA. As to
any such record, the Office of FOIA
Services will proceed in one of the
following ways:
(i) Consultation. In instances where a
record is requested that originated
within a division or office within the
Commission and another Federal agency
has a significant interest in the record
(or a portion thereof), the Office of FOIA
Services will consult with that Federal
agency before responding to a requester.
When the Office of FOIA Services
receives a request for a record (or a
portion thereof) in its possession that
originated with another entity within
the Federal Government that is not
subject to the FOIA, the Office of FOIA
Services will typically consult with that
entity prior to making a release
determination.
(ii) Referral. When the Office of FOIA
Services receives a request for a record
(or a portion thereof) in its possession
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that originated with another Federal
agency subject to the FOIA, the Office
of FOIA Services will typically refer the
record to that agency for direct response
to the requester. Ordinarily, the agency
that originated the record will be
presumed to be best able to make the
disclosure determination. However, if
the Office of FOIA Services and the
originating agency jointly agree that the
Office of FOIA Services is in the best
position to make a disclosure
determination regarding the record, then
the record may be handled as a
consultation and processed by the
Office of FOIA Services. Whenever the
Office of FOIA Services refers a record
to another Federal agency for direct
response to the requester, the Office of
FOIA Services shall notify the requester
in writing of the referral and inform the
requester of the name of the agency to
which the record was referred.
(iii) Coordination. If disclosure of the
identity of the agency to which the
referral would be made could harm an
interest protected by an exemption, the
Office of FOIA Services generally will
coordinate with the originating agency
to seek its views as to disclosure of the
record and then advise the requester of
the release determination for the record
that is the subject of the coordination.
(iv) Classified information. On receipt
of any request involving classified
information, the Commission staff in
possession of the information shall
determine whether the information is
currently and properly classified and
take appropriate action to ensure
compliance with subpart J of this part.
Whenever a request involves a record
containing information that has been
classified or may be appropriate for
classification by another Federal agency
under an executive order concerning the
classification of records, the Office of
FOIA Services shall refer the
responsibility for responding to the
request regarding that information to the
agency that classified the information,
or that should consider the information
for classification. Whenever agency
records contain information that has
been classified by another Federal
agency, the Office of FOIA Services
shall refer the responsibility for
responding to that portion of the request
to the agency that classified the
underlying information except in
circumstances that come within
paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section.
(d) Time limits and expedited
processing. — (1) In general. The Office
of FOIA Services will seek to respond to
requests according to their order of
receipt within each track of the Office
of FOIA Services’ multitrack processing
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
system as described in paragraph (d)(4)
of this section.
(2) Initial response. A determination
whether to comply with a FOIA request
shall be made within 20 days (excepting
Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public
holidays) from the date the Office of
FOIA Services receives a request for a
record under this part, except when the
circumstances described in paragraphs
(d)(3), (5), or (7) of this section are
applicable. In instances where a FOIA
requester has misdirected a request that
is re-routed pursuant to paragraph (c)(2)
of this section, the response time shall
commence on the date that the request
is first received by the Office of FOIA
Services, but in any event not later than
10 working days after the request is first
received by any division or office of the
Commission.
(3) Clarification of request. The Office
of FOIA Services may seek clarification
of a request (or a portion of a request)
for records. The request for clarification
generally should be in writing. The first
time the Office of FOIA Services seeks
clarification, the time for responding to
the entire request (set forth in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section) is tolled until the
requester responds to the clarification
request. The tolled period will end
when the Office of FOIA Services
receives a response from the requester
that reasonably describes the requested
records. If the Office of FOIA Services
asks for clarification and does not
receive a written response from the
requester within 30 calendar days from
the date of the clarification request, the
Office of FOIA Services will presume
that the requester is no longer interested
in the record(s) sought and notify the
requester that any portion of the request
as to which clarification was sought has
been closed.
(4) Multitrack processing. The Office
of FOIA Services shall use a multitrack
system for processing FOIA requests.
The Office of FOIA Services shall
designate one track for requests that are
granted expedited processing, in
accordance with the standards set forth
in paragraph (d)(7) of this section. The
Office of FOIA Services shall use two or
more additional processing tracks that
distinguish between simple and more
complex requests based on the
estimated amount of work and/or time
needed to process the request. Among
the factors the Office of FOIA Services
may consider are the time to perform a
search, the number of pages that must
be reviewed in processing the request,
and the need for consultations or
referrals. The Office of FOIA Services
shall advise requesters of the track into
which their request falls and, when
appropriate, shall offer the requesters an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
opportunity to narrow the scope of their
request so that it can be placed in a
different processing track.
(5) Unusual circumstances. The Office
of FOIA Services may extend the time
period for processing a FOIA request in
‘‘unusual circumstances.’’ To extend the
time, the Office of FOIA Services shall
notify the requester in writing of the
unusual circumstances involved and of
the date by which processing of the
request is expected to be completed. If
the extension exceeds 10 working days,
the Office of FOIA Services shall
provide the requester, in writing, with
an opportunity to modify the request or
arrange an alternative time frame for
processing the request or a modified
request. The Office of FOIA Services
shall also make available its FOIA
Public Liaisons to assist in the
resolution of any disputes and notify the
requester of the right to seek dispute
resolution services from the Office of
Government Information Services. For
purposes of this section, ‘‘unusual
circumstances’’ include:
(i) The need to search for and collect
the requested records from field
facilities or other establishments that are
separate from the office processing the
request.
(ii) The need to search for, collect,
and appropriately examine a
voluminous amount of separate and
distinct records that are the subject of a
single request.
(iii) The need to consult with another
Federal agency having a substantial
interest in the determination of the
FOIA request or among two or more
divisions or offices within the
Commission having substantial subjectmatter interest therein.
(6) Aggregating requests. The Office of
FOIA Services may aggregate requests in
cases where it reasonably believes that
multiple requests, submitted either by a
requester or by a group of requesters
acting in concert, together constitute a
single request that would involve
unusual circumstances, as defined in
paragraph (d)(5) of this section. Multiple
requests involving unrelated matters
shall not be aggregated. The Office of
FOIA Services shall advise requesters,
in writing, when it determines to
aggregate multiple requests and comply
with paragraph (d)(5) of this section.
Aggregation of requests for this purpose
will be conducted independent of
aggregation requests for fee purposes
under paragraph (g)(8) of this section.
(7) Expedited processing. The Office
of FOIA Services shall grant a request
for expedited processing if the requester
demonstrates a ‘‘compelling need’’ for
the records. ‘‘Compelling need’’ means
that a failure to obtain the requested
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
297
records on an expedited basis could
reasonably be expected to pose an
imminent threat to an individual’s life
or physical safety or, if the requester is
primarily engaged in disseminating
information, an urgency to inform the
public about an actual or alleged
Federal Government activity.
(i) A request for expedited processing
may be made at the time of the initial
request for records or at any later time.
(ii) A requester who seeks expedited
processing must submit a statement,
certified to be true and correct to the
best of that person’s knowledge and
belief, explaining why there is a
‘‘compelling need’’ for the records.
(iii) The Office of FOIA Services shall
determine whether to grant or deny a
request for expedited processing and
provide notice of that determination
within 10 calendar days of receipt of the
request by the Office of FOIA Services.
A request for records that has been
granted expedited processing shall be
processed as soon as practicable. If a
request for expedited processing is
denied, any appeal of that
determination shall be decided
expeditiously.
(8) Appeals. An administrative appeal
shall be decided within 20 days
(excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and
legal public holidays) from the date the
Office of FOIA Services receives such
appeal except in the unusual
circumstances specified in paragraph
(d)(5) of this section. In those unusual
circumstances, the 20-day time limit
may be extended by written notice to
the person making the appeal setting
forth the unusual circumstances for
such extension and the date on which
a determination is expected to be
dispatched. No such notice shall specify
a date that would result in an extension
of more than 10 working days.
(e) Responses to requests for records—
(1) Acknowledgment of requests. Upon
receipt of a request for records, the
Office of FOIA Services ordinarily will
send the requester an acknowledgment
letter that provides an assigned request
number for further reference and, if
necessary, confirms whether the
requester is willing to pay fees.
(2) Responses to requests. (i) Any
letter determining whether to comply
with a request will inform the requester
of the right to seek assistance from the
Office of FOIA Services’ FOIA Public
Liaisons.
(ii) If the Office of FOIA Services
makes a determination to grant a request
in whole or in part, it shall notify the
requester in writing of such
determination, disclose records to the
requester, and collect any applicable
fees.
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
298
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(iii) If the Office of FOIA Services
makes an adverse determination
regarding a request, it shall notify the
requester of that determination in
writing. Adverse determinations, or
denials of requests, include decisions
that: The requested record is exempt, in
whole or in part; the request does not
reasonably describe the records sought;
the requested record does not exist (or
is not subject to the FOIA), cannot be
located, or has previously been
destroyed; or the requested record is not
readily producible in the form or format
sought by the requester. Adverse
determinations also include
designations of requesters’ fee category,
denials of fee waiver requests, or denials
of requests for expedited processing.
(iv) An adverse determination letter
shall be signed and include:
(A) The names and titles or positions
of each person responsible for the
adverse determination;
(B) A brief statement of the reasons for
the adverse determination, including
any FOIA exemption applied by the
official denying the request;
(C) For records disclosed in part,
markings or annotations to show the
applicable FOIA exemption(s) and the
amount of information deleted, unless
doing so would harm an interest
protected by an applicable exemption.
The location of the information deleted
shall also be indicated on the record, if
feasible;
(D) An estimate of the volume of any
records or information withheld by
providing the number of pages withheld
in their entirety or some other
reasonable form of estimation. This
estimate is not required if the volume is
otherwise indicated by deletions
marked on the records that are disclosed
in part or if providing an estimate
would harm an interest protected by an
applicable FOIA exemption;
(E) A statement that the adverse
determination may be appealed under
paragraph (f) of this section, and a
description of the requirements for
filing an administrative appeal set forth
in that paragraph; and
(F) A statement of the right of the
requester to seek dispute resolution
services from the Office of FOIA
Services’ FOIA Public Liaisons or the
Office of Government Information
Services (‘‘OGIS’’).
(3) Mediation services. OGIS offers
mediation services to resolve disputes
between requesters and the Office of
FOIA Services as a non-exclusive
alternative to litigation. Requesters with
concerns about the handling of their
requests may contact OGIS.
(f) Administrative appeals—(1)
Administrative review. If a requester
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
receives an adverse determination as
described in paragraph (e)(2)(iii) of this
section, or the request has not been
timely determined within the time
period prescribed in paragraph (d)(2) of
this section or within an extended
period permitted under paragraph (d)(5)
of this section, the requester may file an
appeal to the Office of the General
Counsel consistent with the procedures
described in paragraphs (f)(2) through
(4) of this section. A requester generally
must submit a timely administrative
appeal before seeking review by a court
of an adverse determination.
(2) Time limits. Appeals can be
submitted in writing or electronically,
as described in paragraph (f)(3) of this
section. The appeal must be received
within 90 calendar days of the date of
the written denial of the adverse
determination and must be received no
later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on
the 90th day. If the Office of FOIA
Services has not issued a determination
on a request, an appeal may be
submitted any time after the statutory
time period for responding to a request
ends.
(3) Contents of appeal. Appeals
should be clearly and prominently
identified at the top of the first page as
‘‘Freedom of Information Act Appeal’’
and should provide the assigned FOIA
request number. The appeal should
include a copy of the original request
and adverse determination. Appeals
should include a statement of the
requester’s arguments as to why the
records requested should be made
available and why the adverse
determination was in error. If only a
portion of the adverse determination is
appealed, the requester must specify
which part is being appealed.
(4) How to file and address an appeal.
If submitted by U.S. mail or delivery
service, the appeal must be sent to the
Office of FOIA Services at 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549. Appeals
may also be made by facsimile at 202–
772–9337, email (foiapa@sec.gov), or
online at the Commission’s website
(https://www.sec.gov). A legible return
address must be included with the FOIA
appeal. The requester may also include
other contact information, such as a
telephone number and/or email address.
(5) Adjudication of appeals. The
Office of the General Counsel has the
authority to grant or deny all appeals, in
whole or in part. In appropriate cases
the Office of the General Counsel may
refer appeals to the Commission for
determination. No opportunity for
personal appearance, oral argument, or
hearing on appeal is provided. Upon
receipt of an appeal, the Office of FOIA
Services ordinarily will send the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requester an acknowledgment letter that
confirms receipt of the requester’s
appeal.
(6) Determinations on appeals. A
determination on an appeal must be
made in writing. A determination that
denies an appeal, in whole or in part,
shall include a brief explanation of the
basis for the denial, identify the
applicable FOIA exemptions asserted,
and describe why the exemptions apply.
As applicable, the determination will
provide the requester with notification
of the statutory right to file a lawsuit in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4), and
will inform the requester of the
mediation services offered by the Office
of Government Information Services as
a non-exclusive alternative to litigation.
If the Office of FOIA Services’
determination is remanded or modified
on appeal, the Office of the General
Counsel will notify the requester of that
determination in writing.
(g) Fees— (1) In general. The Office of
FOIA Services shall charge fees for
processing requests under the FOIA in
accordance with the provisions of this
section and with the OMB Guidelines,
except where fees are limited under
paragraph (g)(4) of this section or when
a waiver or reduction is granted under
paragraph (g)(12) of this section. To
resolve any fee issues that arise under
this section, the Office of FOIA Services
may contact a requester for additional
information. The Office of FOIA
Services shall ensure that searches,
review, and duplication are conducted
in an efficient manner. The Office of
FOIA Services ordinarily will collect all
applicable fees before sending copies of
records to a requester. Requesters must
pay fees by check, certified check, or
money order, or where possible, by
electronic payment.
(2) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
(i) Commercial use request is a
request from or on behalf of a person
who seeks information for a use or
purpose that furthers his or her
commercial, trade, or profit interests,
which can include furthering those
interests through litigation. The Office
of FOIA Services will determine
whether to place a requester in the
commercial use category on a case-bycase basis based on the requester’s
intended use of the information.
(ii) Direct costs are those expenses the
Office of FOIA Services and any staff
within the divisions and offices of the
Commission incur in searching for and
duplicating (and, in the case of
commercial use requests, reviewing)
records to respond to a FOIA request.
Direct costs include the salary of the
employee(s) performing the work (i.e.,
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
the basic rate of pay for the employee(s),
plus 16% of that rate to cover benefits),
the cost of materials, and the cost of
operating computers and other
electronic equipment, such as
photocopiers and scanners. Direct costs
do not include overhead expenses such
as the costs of space and of heating or
lighting a facility in which the service
is performed.
(iii) Duplication is reproducing a
record, or the information contained in
it, to respond to a FOIA request. Copies
can take the form of paper, audiovisual
materials, or electronic records, among
others. The Office of FOIA Services
shall honor a requester’s specified
preference of form or format of
disclosure if the record is readily
reproducible with reasonable efforts in
the requested form or format.
(iv) Educational institution is any
school that operates a program of
scholarly research. A requester in this
fee category must show that the request
is authorized by, and is made under the
auspices of, an educational institution
and that the records are not sought for
a commercial use, but rather are sought
to further scholarly research.
(v) Noncommercial scientific
institution is an institution that is not
operated to further a commercial, trade,
or profit interest and that is operated
solely for the purpose of conducting
scientific research, the results of which
are not intended to promote any
particular product or industry. A
requester in this category must show
that the request is authorized by and is
made under the auspices of a qualifying
institution and that the records are
sought to further scientific research and
are not for a commercial use.
(vi) Representative of the news media
or news media requester is any person
or entity that is organized and operated
to publish or broadcast news to the
public and that actively gathers
information of potential interest to a
segment of the public, uses its editorial
skills to turn the raw materials into a
distinct work, and distributes that work
to an audience. The term ‘‘news’’ means
information that is about current events
or that would be of current interest to
the public. The Office of FOIA Services
will determine whether to grant a
requester news media status on a caseby-case basis based upon the requester’s
intended use of the requested material.
(vii) Review is the examination of a
record located in response to a request
to determine whether any portion of it
is exempt from disclosure. Review time
includes doing all that is necessary to
299
prepare the record for disclosure, such
as redacting the record and marking any
applicable exemptions. Review time
also includes time spent obtaining and
considering formal objections to
disclosure made by a submitter under
§ 200.83, but it does not include time
spent resolving legal or policy issues
regarding the application of exemptions.
(viii) Search is the review, manually
or by automated means, of agency
records for the purpose of locating those
records that are responsive to a request.
Search time includes page-by-page or
line-by-line identification of
information within records and the
reasonable efforts expended to locate
and retrieve information from electronic
records.
(3) Charging fees. In responding to
FOIA requests, the Office of FOIA
Services shall charge the fees
summarized in chart form in paragraph
(g)(3)(i) of this section and explained in
paragraphs (g)(3)(ii) through (v) of this
section, unless fees are limited under
paragraph (g)(4) of this section or a
waiver or reduction of fees has been
granted under paragraph (g)(12) of this
section.
(i) The four categories of requesters
and the chargeable fees for each are:
Search fees
Review fees
Duplication fees
(A) Commercial use requesters .......................
(B) Educational and noncommercial scientific
institutions.
(C) Representatives of the news media ..........
Yes .............................
No ...............................
Yes .............................
No ...............................
No ...............................
No ...............................
(D) All other requesters ....................................
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Requester category
Yes (first 2 hours free)
No ...............................
Yes.
Yes (first 100 pages, or equivalent volume,
free).
Yes (first 100 pages, or equivalent volume,
free).
Yes (first 100 pages, or equivalent volume,
free).
(ii) Search fees. (A) Search fees shall
be charged for all requests—other than
requests made by educational
institutions, noncommercial scientific
institutions, or representatives of the
news media—subject to the limitations
of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. The
Office of FOIA Services may charge for
time spent searching even if no
responsive records are located or it is
determined that the records are entirely
exempt from disclosure. Search fees
shall be the direct costs of conducting
the search by agency employees.
(B) Requesters shall be charged the
direct costs associated with conducting
any search that requires the creation of
a new computer program to locate the
requested records. Requesters shall be
notified of the costs associated with
creating and implementing such a
program and must agree to pay the
associated costs before the costs may be
incurred.
(C) For requests that require the
retrieval of agency records stored at a
Federal records center operated by the
National Archives and Records
Administration (‘‘NARA’’), additional
costs shall be charged in accordance
with the Transactional Billing Rate
Schedule established by NARA.
(iii) Review fees. Review fees shall be
charged to requesters who make
commercial use requests. Review fees
shall be assessed in connection with the
initial review of the record, i.e., the
review agency employees conduct to
determine whether an exemption
applies to a particular record or portion
of a record. Also, if an exemption
asserted to withhold a record (or a
portion thereof) is deemed to no longer
apply, any costs associated with the rereview of the records to consider the use
of other exemptions may be assessed as
review fees. Review fees shall be the
direct costs of conducting the review by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the involved employees. Review fees
can be charged even if the records
reviewed ultimately are not disclosed.
(iv) Search and review services
(review applies to commercial-use
requesters only). (A) The Office of FOIA
Services will establish and charge
average rates for the groups of
employees’ salary grades typically
involved in the search and review of
records. Those groups will consist of
employees at:
(1) Grades SK–8 or below;
(2) Grades SK–9 to SK–13; and
(3) Grades SK–14 or above.
(B) The average rates will be based on
the hourly salary (i.e., basic salary plus
locality payment), plus 16 percent for
benefits, of employees who routinely
perform search and review services. The
average hourly rates are listed on the
FOIA web page of the Commission’s
website at https://www.sec.gov and will
be updated as salaries change. Fees will
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
300
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
be charged in quarter-hour increments.
No search fee or review fee will be
charged for a quarter-hour period unless
more than half of that period is required
for search or review.
(v) Duplication fees. Duplication fees
shall be charged to all requesters,
subject to the limitations of paragraph
(g)(4) of this section. Fees for either a
photocopy or printout of a record (no
more than one copy of which need be
supplied) are identified on the FOIA
web page of the Commission’s website
at www.sec.gov. For copies of records
produced on tapes, disks, or other
media, the Office of FOIA Services shall
charge the direct costs of producing the
copy, including operator time. Where
paper documents must be scanned to
comply with a requester’s preference to
receive the records in an electronic
format, the requester shall pay the direct
costs associated with scanning those
materials. For all other forms of
duplication, the Office of FOIA Services
shall also charge the direct costs.
(4) Limitations on charging fees. (i) No
search or review fees will be charged for
requests by educational institutions
(unless the requests are sought for a
commercial use), noncommercial
scientific institutions, or representatives
of the news media.
(ii) Except for requesters seeking
records for a commercial use, the Office
of FOIA Services shall provide without
charge the first 100 pages of duplication
(or the cost equivalent for other media)
and the first two hours of search.
(iii) Fees will not be charged where
the costs of collecting and processing
the fee are likely to equal or exceed the
amount of the fee.
(iv) The Office of FOIA Services will
not assess search fees (or, in the case of
requests from representatives of the
news media or educational or
noncommercial scientific institutions,
duplication fees) when 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(viii) prohibits the
assessment of those fees.
(5) Notice of anticipated fees. (i)
When the Office of FOIA Services
determines or estimates that the fees to
be assessed in accordance with this
section will exceed the amount it would
cost the Office of FOIA Services to
collect and process the fees, the Office
of FOIA Services shall notify the
requester of the actual or estimated
amount of fees, unless the requester has
indicated a willingness to pay fees as
high as the estimated fees. If only a
portion of the fee can be estimated
readily, the Office of FOIA Services
shall advise the requester accordingly. If
the requester is not a commercial use
requester, the notice shall specify that
the requester is entitled to the statutory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
entitlements of 100 pages of duplication
at no charge and, if the requester is
charged search fees, two hours of search
time at no charge.
(ii) In cases in which a requester has
been notified that the actual or
estimated fees will amount to more than
it would cost the Office of FOIA
Services to collect and process the fees,
or amount to more than the amount the
requester indicated a willingness to pay,
the Office of FOIA Services will do no
further work on the request until the
requester commits in writing to pay the
actual or estimated total fee, or
designates some amount of fees the
requester is willing to pay, or in the case
of a requester who is not a commercial
use requester designates that the
requester seeks only that which can be
provided by the statutory entitlements.
The Office of FOIA Services will toll the
response period while it notifies the
requester of the actual or estimated
amount of fees and this time will be
excluded from the 20 working day time
limit (as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of
this section). The requester’s agreement
to pay fees must be made in writing,
must designate an exact dollar amount
the requester is willing to pay, and must
be received within 30 calendar days
from the date of the notification of the
fee estimate. If the requester fails to
submit an agreement to pay the
anticipated fees within 30 calendar days
from the date of the Office of FOIA
Services’ fee notice, the Office of FOIA
Services will presume that the requester
is no longer interested in the records
and notify the requester that the request
has been closed.
(iii) The Office of FOIA Services shall
make available their FOIA Public
Liaisons or other FOIA professionals to
assist any requester in reformulating a
request to meet the requester’s needs at
a lower cost.
(6) Charges for other services.
Although not required to provide
special services, if the Office of FOIA
Services chooses to do so as a matter of
administrative discretion, the direct
costs of providing the service shall be
charged. Examples of such special
services include certifying that records
are true copies, providing multiple
copies of the same document, or
sending records by means other than
first class mail. The cost for the
attestation of records with the
Commission seal (i.e., certifying records
as true copies) is $4.00 per record,
which may be waived for records
certified electronically. Requests for
certified copies of records or documents
shall ordinarily be serviced within 20
working days. Requests will be
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
processed in the order in which they are
received.
(7) Charging interest. The Office of
FOIA Services may begin to charge
interest on any unpaid bill starting on
the 31st calendar day following the date
of billing the requester. Interest charges
shall be assessed at the rate provided in
31 U.S.C. 3717 and accrue from the date
of the billing until the payment is
received. The Office of FOIA Services
shall take all steps authorized by the
Debt Collection Act of 1982, as
amended, and the Commission’s Rules
Relating to Debt Collection to effect
payment, including offset, disclosure to
consumer reporting agencies, and use of
collection agencies.
(8) Aggregating requests. If the Office
of FOIA Services reasonably believes
that a requester or a group of requesters
acting in concert is attempting to divide
a request into a series of requests for the
purpose of avoiding fees, the Office of
FOIA Services may aggregate those
requests and charge accordingly. Among
the factors the Office of FOIA Services
shall consider in deciding whether to
aggregate are whether the requests were
submitted close in time and whether the
requests seek documents about related
matters. The Office of FOIA Services
may presume that multiple requests that
involve related matters made by the
same requester or a group of requesters
within a 30 calendar day period have
been made to avoid fees. For requests
separated by a longer period, the Office
of FOIA Services will aggregate them
only where it determines that
aggregation is warranted in view of all
the circumstances involved.
(9) Advance payments. (i) For
requests other than those described in
paragraphs (g)(9)(ii) and (iii) of this
section, the Office of FOIA Services
shall not require a requester to make
advance payment (i.e., payment made
before the Office of FOIA Services
begins to process or continues to work
on a request). Payment owed for work
already completed (i.e., payment before
copies are sent to a requester) is not an
advance payment.
(ii) When the Office of FOIA Services
determines or estimates that a total fee
to be charged under this section will
exceed $250.00, it shall notify the
requester of the actual or estimated fee
and may require the requester to make
an advance payment of the entire
anticipated fee before beginning to
process the request. A notice under this
paragraph shall offer the requester an
opportunity to discuss the matter with
the Office of FOIA Services’ FOIA
Public Liaisons or other FOIA
professionals to modify the request in
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
an effort to meet the requester’s needs
at a lower cost.
(iii) When a requester has previously
failed to pay a properly charged FOIA
fee to the Office of FOIA Services or
other Federal agency within 30 calendar
days of the date of billing, the Office of
FOIA Services shall notify the requester
that he or she is required to pay the full
amount due, plus any applicable
interest, and to make an advance
payment of the full amount of any
anticipated fee, before the Office of
FOIA Services begins to process a new
request or continues processing a
pending request from that requester.
Where the Office of FOIA Services has
a reasonable basis to believe that a
requester has misrepresented the
requester’s identity to avoid paying
outstanding fees, it may require that the
requester provide proof of identity and
pay in advance.
(iv) When the Office of FOIA Services
requires advance payment or payment
due under paragraphs (g)(9)(ii) and (iii)
of this section, the Office of FOIA
Services will not further process the
request until the required payment is
made. The Office of FOIA Services will
toll the processing of the request while
it notifies the requester of the advanced
payment due and this time will be
excluded from the 20 working day time
limit (as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of
this section). If the requester does not
pay the advance payment within 30
calendar days from the date of the Office
of FOIA Services’ fee notice, the Office
of FOIA Services will presume that the
requester is no longer interested in the
records and notify the requester that the
request has been closed.
(10) Tolling. When necessary for the
Office of FOIA Services to clarify issues
regarding fee assessment with the
requester, the time limit for responding
to a FOIA request is tolled until the
Office of FOIA Services resolves such
issues with the requester.
(11) Other statutes specifically
providing for fees. The fee schedule of
this section does not apply to fees
charged under any statute (except the
FOIA) that specifically requires an
agency to set and collect fees for
particular types of records. In instances
where records responsive to a request
are subject to a statutorily-based fee
schedule program, the Office of FOIA
Services shall inform the requester how
to obtain records from that program.
Provision of such records is not handled
under the FOIA.
(12) Requirements for waiver or
reduction of fees. (i) Records responsive
to a request will be furnished without
charge, or at a charge reduced below
that established under paragraph (g)(3)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
of this section, if the requester asks for
such a waiver in writing and the Office
of FOIA Services determines, after
consideration of information provided
by the requester, that the requester has
demonstrated that:
(A) Disclosure of the requested
information is in the public interest
because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government; and
(B) Disclosure of the information is
not primarily in the commercial interest
of the requester.
(ii) In deciding whether disclosure of
the requested information is likely to
contribute significantly to public
understanding of the operations or
activities of the government, the Office
of FOIA Services shall consider all four
of the following factors:
(A) The subject of the request:
Whether the subject of the requested
records concerns the operations or
activities of the government. The subject
of the requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of
the Federal Government, with a
connection that is direct and clear, not
remote or attenuated.
(B) The informative value of the
information to be disclosed: Whether
the disclosure is likely to contribute to
an understanding of government
operations or activities. The disclosable
portions of the requested records must
be meaningfully informative about
government operations or activities to
be likely to contribute to an increased
public understanding of those
operations or activities. The disclosure
of information that already is in the
public domain, in either a duplicative or
a substantially identical form, would
not be likely to contribute to such
understanding.
(C) The contribution to an
understanding of the subject by the
public likely to result from disclosure:
Whether disclosure of the requested
information will contribute to the
understanding of a reasonably broad
audience of persons interested in the
subject, as opposed to the individual
understanding of the requester. A
requester’s expertise in the subject area
and ability and intention to effectively
convey information to the public shall
be considered. It shall be presumed that
a representative of the news media
satisfies this consideration.
(D) The significance of the
contribution to public understanding:
Whether the disclosure is likely to
contribute significantly to public
understanding of government operations
or activities. The public’s understanding
of the subject in question prior to the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
301
disclosure must be significantly
enhanced by the disclosure.
(iii) In deciding whether disclosure of
the requested information is primarily
in the commercial interest of the
requester, the Office of FOIA Services
shall consider the following factors:
(A) The existence and magnitude of a
commercial interest: Whether the
requester has a commercial interest that
would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. The Office of FOIA Services
shall consider any commercial interest
of the requester (with reference to the
definition of ‘‘commercial use
requester’’ in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this
section), or of any person on whose
behalf the requester may be acting, that
would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. Requesters shall be given an
opportunity to provide explanatory
information regarding this
consideration.
(B) The primary interest in disclosure:
Whether the public interest is greater
than any identified commercial interest
in disclosure. The Office of FOIA
Services ordinarily shall presume that
where a news media requester has
satisfied the public interest standard,
the public interest will be the interest
primarily served by disclosure to that
requester. Disclosure to data brokers or
others who merely compile and market
government information for direct
economic return shall not be presumed
to primarily serve the public interest.
(iv) If only a portion of the requested
records satisfies both the requirements
for a waiver or reduction of fees, a
waiver or reduction of fees will be
granted for only that portion.
(v) Requests for a waiver or reduction
of fees should address all the factors
identified in paragraphs (g)(12)(ii) and
(iii) of this section.
(vi) Denials of requests for a waiver or
reduction of fees are adverse
determinations (as defined in paragraph
(e)(2)(iii) of this section) and may be
appealed to the General Counsel in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in paragraph (f) of this section.
§ 200.80a
■
§ 200.80b
■
[Removed]
6. Remove § 200.80d.
§ 200.80e
■
[Removed]
5. Remove § 200.80c.
§ 200.80d
■
[Removed]
4. Remove § 200.80b.
§ 200.80c
■
[Removed]
3. Remove § 200.80a.
[Removed]
7. Remove § 200.80e.
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
302
§ 200.80f
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules
[Removed]
[Docket No.
at U.S. Forest Service, Ecosystem
Management Coordination, 201 14th St.
SW, 2 Central, Washington, DC 20024.
Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to
(202) 205–1475 to facilitate entry to the
building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Smalls; Assistant Director, Ecosystem
Management Coordination; 202–205–
1475. Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 0596–AD31
Background
National Environmental Policy Act
Compliance
The Forest Service is proposing to
revise its NEPA procedures (including
its regulations at 36 CFR part 220, Forest
Service Manual 1950, and Forest
Service Handbook 1909.15) with the
goal of increasing efficiency of
environmental analysis. The Agency
will continue to hold true to its
commitment to deliver scientifically
based, high-quality analysis to decision
makers that honors its environmental
stewardship responsibilities while
maintaining robust public particiption.
These values are at the core of the Forest
Service mission.
Reforming the Forest Service’s NEPA
procedures is needed for a variety of
reasons. An increasing percentage of the
Agency’s resources are spent each year
to provide the necessary resources for
wildfire suppression, resulting in fewer
resources available for other
management activities such as
restoration. In 1995, fire made up 16
percent of the Forest Service’s annual
appropriated budget. In 2017, more than
50 percent of the Forest Service’s annual
budget will be dedicated to wildfire.
Along with this shift in resources, there
has also been a corresponding shift in
staff, with a 39 percent reduction in all
non-fire personnel since 1995.
Additionally, the Agency has a backlog
of more than 6,000 special use permits
awaiting completion, and over 80
million acres of National Forest System
land are in need of restoration to reduce
the risk of wildfire, insect epidemics,
and forest diseases.
Increasing efficiency of environmental
analysis will enable the Agency to
complete more projects needed to
increase the health and productivity of
our national forests and grasslands. The
Agency’s goal is to complete project
decision making in a timelier manner, to
improve or eliminate inefficient
processes and steps, and where
appropriate increase the scale of
■
8. Remove § 200.80f.
By the Commission.
Dated: December 21, 2017.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–27967 Filed 1–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 220
Forest Service, USDA.
Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; request for comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Forest Service is
proposing to revise its National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
procedures with the goal of increasing
efficiency of environmental analysis.
This will help the Forest Service
implement its core mission by
increasing the health and productivity
of our Nation’s forests for the benefit of
all Americans, and in turn foster
productive and sustainable use of
National Forest System lands. The
Agency’s NEPA procedures are a key
component of its overall environmental
analysis and decision-making process.
The Agency is seeking comments from
the public on ways it can achieve the
goals of increased efficiency of
environmental analysis.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by February 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Please submit comments via
one of the following methods:
1. Public participation portal
(preferred): https://cara.ecosystemmanagement.org/Public/
CommentInput?project=ORMS-1797.
2. Mail: NEPA Services Group, c/o
Amy Barker; USDA Forest Service,
Geospatial Technology and
Applications Center, 2222 West 2300
South, Salt Lake City, UT 84119.
3. Email: nepa-procedures- revision@
fs.fed.us.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received online via
the public reading room at https://cara.
ecosystem-management.org/Public/
ReadingRoom?project=ORMS-1797, or
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
analysis and the amount of activities
authorized in a single analysis and
decision. Improving the efficiency of
environmental analysis and decision
making will enable the agency to ensure
lands and watersheds are sustainable,
healthy, and productive; mitigate
wildfire risk; and contribute to the
economic health of rural communities
through use and access opportunities.
Agency NEPA Procedures
Each Federal agency is required to
develop NEPA procedures that
supplement the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations and reflect the agency’s
unique mandate and mission. The CEQ
encourages agencies to periodically
review their NEPA procedures. The
Forest Service’s NEPA procedures were
last reviewed in 2008 when the Agency
moved a subset of its NEPA procedures
from the Forest Service Manual and
Handbook to the Code of Federal
Regulations. However, the Agency’s
NEPA procedures still reflect in part the
policies and practices established by the
Agency’s 1992 NEPA Manual and
Handbook. The proposed revision of the
Forest Service’s NEPA procedures will
be developed in consultation with CEQ.
Request for Comment
The Agency is seeking public
comment on the following:
• Processes and analysis
requirements that can be modified,
reduced, or eliminated in order to
reduce time and cost while maintaining
science-based, high-quality analysis;
public involvement; and honoring
agency stewardship responsibilities.
• Approaches to landscape-scale
analysis and decision making under
NEPA that facilitate restoration of
National Forest System lands.
• Classes of actions that are unlikely,
either individually or cumulatively, to
have significant impacts and therefore
should be categorically excluded from
NEPA’s environmental assessment and
environmental impact statement
requirements, such as integrated
restoration projects; special use
authorizations; and activities to
maintain and manage Agency sites
(including recreation sites), facilities,
and associated infrastructure.
• Ways the Agency might expand and
enhance coordination of environmental
review and authorization decisions with
other Federal agencies, as well as State,
Tribal, or local environmental reviews.
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 291-302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27967]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 200
[Release Nos. 34-82373; FOIA-192; File No. S7-09-17]
RIN 3235-AM25
Freedom of Information Act Regulations
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or
``SEC'') is publishing for comment proposed amendments to the
Commission's regulations under the Freedom of Information Act
(``FOIA''). This rule proposes revisions to the Commission's
regulations under the FOIA to reflect changes required by the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016 (``Improvement Act''); and clarify, update, and
streamline the language of several procedural provisions.
DATES: Comments should be received by February 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form located at
https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed.shtml;
Send an email to [email protected], including File
Number S7-09-17 on the subject line; or
Use the Federal eRulemaking Portal located at https://www.regulations.gov, following the instructions for submitting
comments.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number S7-09-17. This file number
should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help us
process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one
method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed.shtml). Comments
are also available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's
Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington DC 20549, on
official working days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. All
comments received will be posted without change.
[[Page 292]]
Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly.
Studies, memoranda, or other substantive items may be added by the
Commission or staff to the comment file during this rulemaking. A
notification of the inclusion in the comment file of any such materials
will be made available on the Commission's website. To ensure direct
electronic receipt of such notifications, sign up through the ``Stay
Connected'' option at www.sec.gov to receive notifications by email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Tallarico, Senior Counsel, Office
of the General Counsel, (202) 551-5132; Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-5041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Commission is proposing revisions to its regulations under the
FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552. As required by the Improvement Act, Public Law 114-
185, 130 Stat. 538, the Commission has reviewed its FOIA regulations to
identify any changes that are necessary to conform its regulations to
the Improvement Act. In connection with that review, the Commission has
identified both changes necessitated by the Improvement Act and other
areas where it would be beneficial to clarify, update, and streamline
the language of several procedural provisions. Due to the scope of the
proposed revisions, the proposed rule would replace the Commission's
current FOIA regulations in their entirety (17 CFR 200.80 through
200.80f).
II. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
A. Changes To Conform to the Improvement Act
The Commission is proposing four changes to the Commission's FOIA
regulations to conform them to the Improvement Act. First, the proposed
rule revises Section 200.80(a) to provide that records the FOIA
requires to be made available for public inspection will be available
in electronic format. Second, the proposed rule revises Section
200.80(c) to provide that a request for records may be denied to the
extent the exemptions in 5 U.S.C. 552(b) apply to the requested records
and Commission staff reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an
interest protected by the applicable exemption, the disclosure of the
requested records is prohibited by law, or the requested records are
otherwise exempted from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). Third, the
proposed rule revises the regulations to state that FOIA requesters may
seek assistance from the Office of FOIA Services' FOIA Public Liaisons
(Sections 200.80(b), (d), and (e)) and to advise FOIA requesters of
their right to seek dispute resolution services offered by the Office
of Government Information Services in the case of a denied request
(Section 200.80(e)). Fourth, the proposed rule revises Section
200.80(g) to incorporate the amendments to the FOIA requiring agencies
to waive fees, under certain circumstances, if they do not comply with
the time limits under the FOIA.
B. Proposed Amendments To Update, Clarify, and Streamline the FOIA
Regulations
The remaining proposed changes are to certain procedural
provisions. Those changes clarify, update, and streamline the
Commission's regulations, and most of the changes make the regulations
consistent with existing practices. The proposed regulations, among
other things, update the various methods for submitting FOIA requests
and administrative appeals (Sections 200.80(b) and (f)); describe
certain information that is required when submitting requests for
records about oneself or another individual (Section 200.80(b));
explain the situations in which the Office of FOIA Services staff will
work with other Federal agencies that have an interest in agency
records that may be responsive to a request (Section 200.80(c));
incorporate language that allows the Office of FOIA Services to seek a
one-time clarification of an ambiguous request and toll the time period
for responding to the request until the requester clarifies the request
(Section 200.80(c)); clarify when the 20-day statutory time limit for
responding to requests begins (i.e., when requests are received by the
Office of FOIA Services and when requests are modified so that they
reasonably describe the records sought) (Section 200.80(d)); clarify
the Office of FOIA Services' system for multi-track processing of
requests (Section 200.80(d)); and enable the Office of FOIA Services to
aggregate requests involving related matters where it appears that
multiple requests together constitute a single request that would
involve unusual circumstances (Section 200.80(d)).
Two of the procedural changes impose possible burdens on
requesters. First, requesters must include their full names and return
addresses in their request (Section 200.80(b)). Second, the Office of
FOIA Services may aggregate related requests from one requester (or a
group of requesters), and that aggregation may permit the Office of
FOIA Services to extend deadlines for processing the request or place
the request in a queue for complex requests. Other procedural changes
provide more flexibility to requesters. For example, the proposed rule
provides that administrative appeals need only be sent to the Office of
FOIA Services (no longer requiring appeals to be sent to both the
Office of FOIA Services and the Office of the General Counsel) (Section
200.80(f)).
The proposed rule also clarifies, consistent with existing
practice, that the Office of FOIA Services will close requests if
requesters do not take certain steps within set time periods. For
example, requesters must respond to the Office of FOIA Services' one-
time clarification request within 30 calendar days (Section 200.80(d));
agree to pay anticipated fees within 30 calendar days of the Office of
FOIA Services' fee estimate (Section 200.80(g)); and, when required to
do so, make an advance payment within 30 calendar days of the Office of
FOIA Services' fee notice (Section 200.80(g)).
C. Proposed Revisions to Fee Provisions
The proposed rule also revises the Office of FOIA Services' fee
procedures and fee schedule in Section 200.80(g). Two of the revisions
could change current practices. First, the proposed rule allows the
Office of FOIA Services to collect fees before sending records to a
requester instead of seeking payment when the records are sent. Second,
the proposed rule removes from the rule the set duplication fee of 24
cents per page and instead refers requesters to the FOIA fee page on
the Commission's website, where the current fee will be posted.\1\ The
duplication fee posted on the website will reflect the direct costs of
photocopying or producing a printout, taking into account various
factors including the salary of the employee(s) performing the work and
the cost of materials. The duplication fee posted on the Commission's
website will be adjusted as appropriate to reflect current costs.
Eliminating the set duplication fee will allow the Office of FOIA
Services to align its photocopying and printout fees with the actual
costs of duplicating records for production to requesters (in paper
format) without having to amend the regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Commission anticipates that the initial posted fee will
be 15 cents per page, and the Commission is already charging this
lower cost.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 293]]
The proposed rule also codifies several existing practices. For
example, it states that fees for duplicating records onto electronic
medium (including the costs associated with scanning materials, where
applicable) will be the direct costs of duplicating records for
requesters; clarifies that the Office of FOIA Services will not process
any requests once it determines that a fee may be charged unless the
requester commits to pay the estimated fees; adds and clarifies fee-
related definitions; clarifies the direct costs that can be charged by
the Office of FOIA Services as part of search, review, and duplication
fees; and sets forth the various methods by which FOIA processing fees
can be paid.
D. Proposed Elimination of Certain Provisions
The proposed rule eliminates certain provisions in the Commission's
current FOIA regulations that repeat information contained in the FOIA
statute and do not need to be in the Commission's regulations. Among
the provisions that the Commission is proposing to remove are: (1) The
list of information the FOIA requires the Commission to publish in the
Federal Register (Section 200.80(a)(1) of the current regulations), (2)
the categories of records the FOIA requires the Commission to make
available for public inspection (Section 200.80(a)(2) of the current
regulations), and (3) the nine categories of records that are exempt
from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b) (Section 200.80(b) of the current
regulations). Finally, the Commission is proposing to eliminate
Appendices A through F. Appendices A through D and F provide general
information that is available on the Commission's website to the extent
it is relevant to the public. The information in Appendix E is revised
and updated and moved to Section 200.80(g) (Fees) of the proposed
regulations.
E. Structure of the Proposed Rule
The structure of the regulations will be revised accordingly:
Section 200.80(a) (General provisions); Section 200.80(b) (Requirements
for making requests); Section 200.80(c) (Processing requests); Section
200.80(d) (Time limits and expedited processing); Section 200.80(e)
(Responses to requests); Section 200.80(f) (Administrative appeals);
and Section 200.80(g) (Fees).
III. General Request for Comments
We request and encourage any interested person to submit comments
on any aspect of the proposals, other matters that might have an impact
on the proposals, and suggestions for additional changes. We note that
comments are of particular assistance to us if accompanied by analysis
of the issues addressed in those comments and any data that may support
the analysis. We urge commenters to be as specific as possible.
IV. Economic Analysis
The Commission is sensitive to the economic effects, including the
costs and benefits, that result from its rules. Section 23(a)(2) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') requires the
Commission, in making rules pursuant to any provision of the Exchange
Act, to consider among other matters the impact any such rule would
have on competition and prohibits any rule that would impose a burden
on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Exchange Act.\2\ Further, Section 3(f) of the
Exchange Act requires the Commission, when engaging in rulemaking where
it is required to consider or determine whether an action is necessary
or appropriate in the public interest, to consider, in addition to the
protection of investors, whether the action will promote efficiency,
competition, and capital formation.\3\ As discussed further below, the
Commission preliminarily believes that the economic effects of the
proposed amendments would be limited. The Commission notes that, where
possible, it has attempted to quantify the costs, benefits, and effects
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation expected to result
from the proposed amendments. In some cases, however, the Commission is
unable to quantify the economic effects because it lacks the
information necessary to provide a reasonable estimate. Additionally,
some of the potential benefits of the amendments are inherently
difficult to quantify.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78w(a).
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed revisions fall into four categories. First, as
discussed in more detail above, the Commission is proposing amendments
to its regulations to conform the regulations to the Improvement Act.
Consistent with the Improvement Act, the proposed rule provides: (1)
Records required to be made available pursuant to the FOIA will be made
available in electronic format; (2) records will be withheld under the
exemptions in 5 U.S.C. 552(b) only if Commission staff reasonably
foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by the
applicable exemption or disclosure is prohibited by law; (3) FOIA
requesters may seek assistance from the Office of FOIA Services' FOIA
Public Liaisons and will be advised that they have the right to seek
dispute resolution services from the Office of Government Information
Services if their request is denied; and (4) the Office of FOIA
Services is required to waive fees, in certain circumstances, if it
does not comply with the time limits under the FOIA. The Commission
believes that these changes would have minimal impact on FOIA
requesters because they largely codify the Commission's existing
practices. To the extent the amendments result in these practices being
followed more consistently, they could benefit the public by increasing
the amount of information available, making more information available
in an electronic format, and ensuring that requesters know of their
right to seek alternative dispute resolution. The Commission also
believes that the public could benefit from the increased transparency
regarding these practices. The Commission does not expect these
proposed amendments to result in additional costs to any member of the
public.
Second, the Commission is proposing amendments to procedural
provisions, which are intended to better reflect and improve existing
practice. Most of these changes codify existing Office of FOIA Services
practice, including: (1) Adding to the regulation additional methods
for submitting FOIA requests and administrative appeals; (2) clarifying
the existing procedures for submitting requests for records about
oneself or another individual; (3) clarifying the existing procedures
for submitting a proper FOIA request and seeking clarification of a
request; (4) clarifying existing procedures for submitting an
administrative appeal; and (5) clarifying the existing practice that
limits administrative appeals to written filings (i.e., there is no
opportunity for personal appearance, oral argument, or hearing on
appeal). The Commission does not expect these changes to result in
additional costs to any member of the public. The Commission also
expects that there would be some benefit to FOIA requesters from the
increased transparency regarding these practices.
Two proposed procedural changes could affect members of the public.
First, FOIA requesters will be required to include their full names and
addresses in their requests. Providing a full name and address is not
itself burdensome, but some requesters may prefer to remain anonymous
and could be deterred from submitting FOIA requests by this
requirement. However,
[[Page 294]]
because nearly all FOIA requesters provide this information already,
the Commission expects that the economic impact of the amendment will
be minimal. Second, the Office of FOIA Services will be able to
aggregate related requests from one requester (or a group of
requesters). The Office of FOIA Services could aggregate requests that
on their own do not involve ``unusual circumstances,'' as defined in
the proposed regulations, or warrant placement in a track for complex
requests, so aggregation may lead to extended deadlines for processing
a request or cause a request to be handled after other complex
requests. Based on past experience, the Commission expects that few
requests will be aggregated. In addition, if the aggregation of
requests results in the requests being placed in a track for complex
requests that could extend the processing time, the requester could
modify the request so that it can be processed more quickly. Thus, the
Commission expects that the impact of this amendment also will be
minimal.
Third, the Commission is proposing to revise the Office of FOIA
Services' fee procedures and fee schedule in several ways, including:
(1) Eliminating from the rule the per page duplication fee for copying
or printing requested records, and instead referring requesters to the
FOIA fee page on the Commission's website; (2) allowing the Office of
FOIA Services to collect fees before sending records to a requester
instead of seeking payment when the records are sent; (3) clarifying
the direct costs that can be charged by the Office of FOIA Services as
part of its search, review, and duplication fees; and (4) codifying the
existing Office of FOIA Services practice of charging requesters the
actual cost of production for materials produced in an electronic
format. In general, lowering fees associated with FOIA requests could
encourage additional FOIA submissions, while raising fees could deter
them. However, as discussed below, the Commission does not anticipate
that any of its proposed changes to the Office of FOIA Services' fee
procedures would impose significant new costs on FOIA requesters.
With respect to the elimination of the set per page duplication
fee, the Commission anticipates that the initial posted fee will be 15
cents per page, and the Office of FOIA Services has already lowered its
per page duplication fee from 24 cents to 15 cents to reflect its
actual duplication costs. Even if the Office of FOIA Services were to
increase the per page duplication fee in the future, the impact of any
increase would likely be minimal. Information about the fees the
Commission has collected for FOIA requests for the past six years
serves as a baseline from which the Commission can estimate the
economic effects of this proposed change. Table 1 shows the number of
requests received and processed by the Commission during fiscal years
2011 through 2016 and the fees the Commission collected. The fees
collected by the Commission for processing FOIA requests include
charges for staff time associated with locating, reviewing, and copying
responsive documents. The Commission collects fees for duplication of
24 cents per page for paper copies and the costs of production for
other types of media. The fee schedule for FOIA requests is available
on the Commission's website.
Table 1--FOIA Requests in Fiscal Years 2011 to 2016
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fees collected
Fiscal year Requests Requests for processing
received processed requests
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011.......................................................... 11,555 11,562 $78,005.94
2012.......................................................... 11,292 11,302 27,577.00
2013.......................................................... 12,275 12,167 35,954.30
2014.......................................................... 14,862 14,757 22,670.81
2015.......................................................... 16,898 16,207 19,890.07
2016.......................................................... 14,458 15,196 41,029.68
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As shown in Table 1, from fiscal year 2011-2016, the Office of FOIA
Services collected an average of $37,521.30 per year in fees for
processing an average of 13,532 requests. These amounts correspond to
an average fee of $2.77 collected per request processed.\4\ Even if all
of those fees were for duplication (which they were not), a one cent
per page increase in duplication fees would result in an increase in
total fees collected of approximately $1,563.39,\5\ corresponding to an
average fee of $2.89 collected per request processed.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Calculated as $37,521.30/13,532 = $2.77.
\5\ To arrive at this estimated increase, we divide $37,521.30
in duplication fees by a cost of $0.24 per page to derive an
estimate of approximately 156,339 pages of copies on average per
fiscal year. 156,339 pages x $0.01 increase in per-page duplication
fees = $1,563.39 in additional total processing fees.
\6\ Calculated as ($37,521.30 + $1,563.39)/13,532 = $2.89.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the amendment providing that the FOIA Office can
collect fees before sending records to a requester (instead of seeking
payment when the records are sent), the Commission expects that any
additional cost will be limited to a slight delay in receiving
documents. The timing of the collection would not itself impose any
additional costs on FOIA requesters because the timing would not alter
the amount of fees charged. Any delay in receiving the documents would
not be significant because a FOIA requester could make an electronic
payment upon receipt of the request for payment, and the Office of FOIA
Services would then provide the documents. The Commission notes that
some requesters may choose to forego receiving the records in question
if the fees are substantial, though even this impact may be muted
because requesters would have been advised of and approved potential
charges before requests are processed by the FOIA Office.
The proposed clarification regarding direct costs and codification
of existing practice with respect to fees for materials produced in an
electronic format are consistent with existing practice, and the
Commission therefore does not expect these amendments to impose any
additional burden on the public. The other proposed changes to the
Office of FOIA Services' fee procedures also codify existing processes
and will therefore not impose any additional burden on requesters.
These proposed changes include: (1) Clarifying that the Office of FOIA
Services will not process any requests once it determines that a fee
may be charged unless the requester commits to pay the estimated fees;
and (2) adding and clarifying certain fee-related definitions. The
Commission does not expect these amendments to result in additional
costs to any member of the public. To the contrary, the Commission
[[Page 295]]
believes that the public could benefit from the increased transparency
regarding these practices.
Finally, the Commission is proposing to eliminate certain
provisions in its FOIA regulations that are restatements of provisions
in the FOIA statute. The Commission does not expect these amendments to
result in any economic effects, as the elimination of these redundant
provisions would not have any substantive consequence.
The Commission believes that the proposed amendments would not have
any significant impact on efficiency, competition, or capital
formation. The Commission requests comment on all aspects of the
benefits and costs of the proposal, including any anticipated impacts
on efficiency, competition, or capital formation.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Section 3(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (``RFA'')
requires the Commission to undertake an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis of the effect of the proposed rule amendments on small
entities unless the Commission certifies that the proposal, if adopted,
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. As discussed above, most of the proposed changes are
procedural. Many of the changes codify existing practices and are
therefore unlikely to have any economic impact on requesters. With
respect to the changes to the fee schedule, under the FOIA, agencies
may recover only the direct costs of searching for, reviewing, and
duplicating the records processed for requesters. These fees are
typically nominal, and the proposed changes to the fees are therefore
similarly nominal and would not have a significant economic impact on a
FOIA requester, even a small entity. In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the Commission certifies that the
proposed amendments to the FOIA regulations, if adopted, would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The Commission requests comment regarding the appropriateness
of its certification.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule would not impose any new ``collection of
information'' requirement as defined by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (``PRA''), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.; nor would it create any new
filing, reporting, recordkeeping, or disclosure reporting requirements.
Accordingly, we are not submitting the proposed rule to the Office of
Management and Budget for review under the PRA.\7\ We request comment
on whether our conclusion that there are no new collections of
information is correct.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d) and 5 CFR 1320.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, a rule is considered ``major'' where, if adopted, it results or
is likely to result in: (i) An annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more (either in the form of an increase or a decrease); (ii)
a major increase in costs or prices for consumers or individual
industries; or (iii) significant adverse effect on competition,
investment, or innovation.\8\ We request comment on the potential
impact of the proposed rule on the economy on an annual basis, any
potential increase in costs or prices for consumers or individual
industries, and any potential effect on competition, investment, or
innovation. Commenters are requested to provide empirical data and
other factual support for their view to the extent possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Public Law 104-121, 110 Stat. 857 (1996) (codified in
various sections of 5 U.S.C., 15 U.S.C. and as a note to 5 U.S.C.
601).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VIII. Statutory Authority and Text of Proposed Rule Amendments
The amendments contained herein are being proposed under the
authority set forth in Public Law 114-185 Sec. 3(a), 130 Stat. 538; 5
U.S.C. 552; 15 U.S.C. 77f(d), 77s, 77ggg(a), 78d-1, 78w(a), 80a-37(a),
80a-44(b), 80b-10(a), and 80b-11(a).
List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 200
Administrative practice and procedure; Freedom of information.
Text of Proposed Amendments
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Commission proposes to
amend 17 CFR part 200 as follows:
PART 200--ORGANIZATION; CONDUCT AND ETHICS; AND INFORMATION AND
REQUESTS
Subpart D--Information and Requests
0
1. The authority citation for subpart D is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 77f(d), 77s,
77ggg(a), 77sss, 78m(F)(3), 78w, 80a-37, 80a-44(a), 80a-44(b), 80b-
10(a), and 80b-11, unless otherwise noted.
Section 200.80 also issued under Public Law 114-185 sec. 3(a),
130 Stat. 538; 5 U.S.C. 552; 15 U.S.C. 77f(d), 77s, 77ggg(a), 78d-1,
78w(a), 80a-37(a), 80a-44(b), 80b-10(a), and 80b-11(a), unless
otherwise noted.
Section 200.82 also issued under 15 U.S.C. 78n.
Section 200.83 also issued under E.O. 12600, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp.,
p. 235.
0
2. Revise Sec. 200.80 to read as follows:
Sec. 200.80 Securities and Exchange Commission records and
information.
(a) General provisions. (1) This section contains the rules that
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission follows in processing
requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (``FOIA''), 5
U.S.C. 552, as amended. These rules should be read in conjunction with
the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee
Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and
Budget (``OMB Guidelines''). Requests made by individuals for records
about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are
processed in accordance with the Commission's Privacy Act regulations
at subpart H, as well as this section.
(2) Proactive disclosure of Agency records. (i) Records that the
FOIA requires to be made available for public inspection in an
electronic format (pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2)) are accessible
through the Commission's website, https://www.sec.gov. Each division and
office of the Commission is responsible for determining which of its
records are required to be made publicly available in an electronic
format, as well as identifying additional records of interest to the
public that are appropriate for public disclosure, and for posting and
indexing such records. Each division and office shall ensure that its
posted records and indexes are reviewed and updated on an ongoing
basis.
(ii) Those who do not have access to the internet may obtain these
records by contacting the Commission's Office of FOIA Services by
telephone at 202-551-7900, by email at [email protected], or by visiting
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736, on official working days between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 3:00 p.m.
(b) Requirements for making requests for records-- (1) How made and
addressed. The Commission has a centralized system for responding to
FOIA requests, with all requests processed by the Office of FOIA
Services. Requests for agency records must be in writing and include
the requester's full name and a legible return address. Requesters may
also include other contact information, such as an email address and a
telephone number. Requests may be submitted by
[[Page 296]]
U.S. mail or delivery service and addressed to the Freedom of
Information Act Officer, SEC, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.
Requests may also be made by facsimile (202-772-9337), email
([email protected]), or online at the Commission's website (https://www.sec.gov). The request (and envelope, if the request is mailed or
hand-delivered) should be marked ``Freedom of Information Act
Request.''
(2) Requests for records about oneself or another individual. (i) A
requester who is making a request for records about himself or herself
must comply with the verification of identity provisions set forth in
subpart H of this part to obtain any documents that would not be
available to the public under the FOIA.
(ii) For requests for records about another individual, a requester
may receive greater access by submitting either a notarized
authorization signed by the individual permitting disclosure of his or
her records or proof that the individual is deceased (e.g., a copy of a
death certificate or an obituary). The Office of FOIA Services can
require a requester to supply additional information if necessary to
verify that a particular individual has consented to disclosure.
(3) Description of records sought. A FOIA request must reasonably
describe the agency records sought with sufficient specificity with
respect to names, dates, and subject matter to enable personnel within
the divisions and offices of the Commission to locate them with a
reasonable effort. Before submitting a request, a requester may contact
the Office of FOIA Services' FOIA Public Liaisons to discuss the
records they are seeking and to receive assistance in describing the
records (contact information for these individuals is on the
Commission's website, https://www.sec.gov). If the Office of FOIA
Services determines that a request does not reasonably describe the
records sought, it shall inform the requester what additional
information is needed or how the request is insufficient. A requester
who is attempting to reformulate or modify such a request may discuss
the request with the Office of FOIA Services' designated FOIA contact,
its FOIA Public Liaisons, or a representative of the Office of FOIA
Services, each of whom is available to assist the requester in
reasonably describing the records sought. When a requester fails to
provide sufficient information within 30 calendar days after having
been asked to reasonably describe the records sought, the Office of
FOIA Services shall notify the requester in writing that the request
has not been properly made, that no further action will be taken, and
that the FOIA request is closed. Such a notice constitutes an adverse
determination under paragraph (e)(2) of this section for which the
Office of FOIA Services shall follow the procedures for a denial letter
under paragraph (e)(2) of this section. In cases where a requester has
modified his or her request so that it reasonably describes the
requested records, the date of receipt for purposes of the 20-day time
limit of paragraph (d) of this section shall be the date of receipt of
the modified request.
(c) Processing requests--(1) In general. (i) A request for records
may be denied to the extent the exemptions in 5 U.S.C. 552(b) apply to
the requested records and:
(A) Commission staff reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm
an interest protected by the applicable exemption; or
(B) The disclosure of the requested records is prohibited by law or
is exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3).
(ii) In determining which records are responsive to a request, the
Office of FOIA Services ordinarily will include only records in the
agency's possession as of the date that it begins its search.
(2) Re-routing of misdirected requests. Any division or office
within the Commission that receives a written request for records
should promptly forward the request to the Office of FOIA Services for
processing.
(3) Consultation, referral, and coordination. When reviewing
records located in response to a request, the Office of FOIA Services
will determine whether another Federal agency is better able to
determine if the record is exempt from disclosure under the FOIA. As to
any such record, the Office of FOIA Services will proceed in one of the
following ways:
(i) Consultation. In instances where a record is requested that
originated within a division or office within the Commission and
another Federal agency has a significant interest in the record (or a
portion thereof), the Office of FOIA Services will consult with that
Federal agency before responding to a requester. When the Office of
FOIA Services receives a request for a record (or a portion thereof) in
its possession that originated with another entity within the Federal
Government that is not subject to the FOIA, the Office of FOIA Services
will typically consult with that entity prior to making a release
determination.
(ii) Referral. When the Office of FOIA Services receives a request
for a record (or a portion thereof) in its possession that originated
with another Federal agency subject to the FOIA, the Office of FOIA
Services will typically refer the record to that agency for direct
response to the requester. Ordinarily, the agency that originated the
record will be presumed to be best able to make the disclosure
determination. However, if the Office of FOIA Services and the
originating agency jointly agree that the Office of FOIA Services is in
the best position to make a disclosure determination regarding the
record, then the record may be handled as a consultation and processed
by the Office of FOIA Services. Whenever the Office of FOIA Services
refers a record to another Federal agency for direct response to the
requester, the Office of FOIA Services shall notify the requester in
writing of the referral and inform the requester of the name of the
agency to which the record was referred.
(iii) Coordination. If disclosure of the identity of the agency to
which the referral would be made could harm an interest protected by an
exemption, the Office of FOIA Services generally will coordinate with
the originating agency to seek its views as to disclosure of the record
and then advise the requester of the release determination for the
record that is the subject of the coordination.
(iv) Classified information. On receipt of any request involving
classified information, the Commission staff in possession of the
information shall determine whether the information is currently and
properly classified and take appropriate action to ensure compliance
with subpart J of this part. Whenever a request involves a record
containing information that has been classified or may be appropriate
for classification by another Federal agency under an executive order
concerning the classification of records, the Office of FOIA Services
shall refer the responsibility for responding to the request regarding
that information to the agency that classified the information, or that
should consider the information for classification. Whenever agency
records contain information that has been classified by another Federal
agency, the Office of FOIA Services shall refer the responsibility for
responding to that portion of the request to the agency that classified
the underlying information except in circumstances that come within
paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section.
(d) Time limits and expedited processing. -- (1) In general. The
Office of FOIA Services will seek to respond to requests according to
their order of receipt within each track of the Office of FOIA
Services' multitrack processing
[[Page 297]]
system as described in paragraph (d)(4) of this section.
(2) Initial response. A determination whether to comply with a FOIA
request shall be made within 20 days (excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and
legal public holidays) from the date the Office of FOIA Services
receives a request for a record under this part, except when the
circumstances described in paragraphs (d)(3), (5), or (7) of this
section are applicable. In instances where a FOIA requester has
misdirected a request that is re-routed pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of
this section, the response time shall commence on the date that the
request is first received by the Office of FOIA Services, but in any
event not later than 10 working days after the request is first
received by any division or office of the Commission.
(3) Clarification of request. The Office of FOIA Services may seek
clarification of a request (or a portion of a request) for records. The
request for clarification generally should be in writing. The first
time the Office of FOIA Services seeks clarification, the time for
responding to the entire request (set forth in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section) is tolled until the requester responds to the clarification
request. The tolled period will end when the Office of FOIA Services
receives a response from the requester that reasonably describes the
requested records. If the Office of FOIA Services asks for
clarification and does not receive a written response from the
requester within 30 calendar days from the date of the clarification
request, the Office of FOIA Services will presume that the requester is
no longer interested in the record(s) sought and notify the requester
that any portion of the request as to which clarification was sought
has been closed.
(4) Multitrack processing. The Office of FOIA Services shall use a
multitrack system for processing FOIA requests. The Office of FOIA
Services shall designate one track for requests that are granted
expedited processing, in accordance with the standards set forth in
paragraph (d)(7) of this section. The Office of FOIA Services shall use
two or more additional processing tracks that distinguish between
simple and more complex requests based on the estimated amount of work
and/or time needed to process the request. Among the factors the Office
of FOIA Services may consider are the time to perform a search, the
number of pages that must be reviewed in processing the request, and
the need for consultations or referrals. The Office of FOIA Services
shall advise requesters of the track into which their request falls
and, when appropriate, shall offer the requesters an opportunity to
narrow the scope of their request so that it can be placed in a
different processing track.
(5) Unusual circumstances. The Office of FOIA Services may extend
the time period for processing a FOIA request in ``unusual
circumstances.'' To extend the time, the Office of FOIA Services shall
notify the requester in writing of the unusual circumstances involved
and of the date by which processing of the request is expected to be
completed. If the extension exceeds 10 working days, the Office of FOIA
Services shall provide the requester, in writing, with an opportunity
to modify the request or arrange an alternative time frame for
processing the request or a modified request. The Office of FOIA
Services shall also make available its FOIA Public Liaisons to assist
in the resolution of any disputes and notify the requester of the right
to seek dispute resolution services from the Office of Government
Information Services. For purposes of this section, ``unusual
circumstances'' include:
(i) The need to search for and collect the requested records from
field facilities or other establishments that are separate from the
office processing the request.
(ii) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a
voluminous amount of separate and distinct records that are the subject
of a single request.
(iii) The need to consult with another Federal agency having a
substantial interest in the determination of the FOIA request or among
two or more divisions or offices within the Commission having
substantial subject-matter interest therein.
(6) Aggregating requests. The Office of FOIA Services may aggregate
requests in cases where it reasonably believes that multiple requests,
submitted either by a requester or by a group of requesters acting in
concert, together constitute a single request that would involve
unusual circumstances, as defined in paragraph (d)(5) of this section.
Multiple requests involving unrelated matters shall not be aggregated.
The Office of FOIA Services shall advise requesters, in writing, when
it determines to aggregate multiple requests and comply with paragraph
(d)(5) of this section. Aggregation of requests for this purpose will
be conducted independent of aggregation requests for fee purposes under
paragraph (g)(8) of this section.
(7) Expedited processing. The Office of FOIA Services shall grant a
request for expedited processing if the requester demonstrates a
``compelling need'' for the records. ``Compelling need'' means that a
failure to obtain the requested records on an expedited basis could
reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to an individual's
life or physical safety or, if the requester is primarily engaged in
disseminating information, an urgency to inform the public about an
actual or alleged Federal Government activity.
(i) A request for expedited processing may be made at the time of
the initial request for records or at any later time.
(ii) A requester who seeks expedited processing must submit a
statement, certified to be true and correct to the best of that
person's knowledge and belief, explaining why there is a ``compelling
need'' for the records.
(iii) The Office of FOIA Services shall determine whether to grant
or deny a request for expedited processing and provide notice of that
determination within 10 calendar days of receipt of the request by the
Office of FOIA Services. A request for records that has been granted
expedited processing shall be processed as soon as practicable. If a
request for expedited processing is denied, any appeal of that
determination shall be decided expeditiously.
(8) Appeals. An administrative appeal shall be decided within 20
days (excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) from the
date the Office of FOIA Services receives such appeal except in the
unusual circumstances specified in paragraph (d)(5) of this section. In
those unusual circumstances, the 20-day time limit may be extended by
written notice to the person making the appeal setting forth the
unusual circumstances for such extension and the date on which a
determination is expected to be dispatched. No such notice shall
specify a date that would result in an extension of more than 10
working days.
(e) Responses to requests for records-- (1) Acknowledgment of
requests. Upon receipt of a request for records, the Office of FOIA
Services ordinarily will send the requester an acknowledgment letter
that provides an assigned request number for further reference and, if
necessary, confirms whether the requester is willing to pay fees.
(2) Responses to requests. (i) Any letter determining whether to
comply with a request will inform the requester of the right to seek
assistance from the Office of FOIA Services' FOIA Public Liaisons.
(ii) If the Office of FOIA Services makes a determination to grant
a request in whole or in part, it shall notify the requester in writing
of such determination, disclose records to the requester, and collect
any applicable fees.
[[Page 298]]
(iii) If the Office of FOIA Services makes an adverse determination
regarding a request, it shall notify the requester of that
determination in writing. Adverse determinations, or denials of
requests, include decisions that: The requested record is exempt, in
whole or in part; the request does not reasonably describe the records
sought; the requested record does not exist (or is not subject to the
FOIA), cannot be located, or has previously been destroyed; or the
requested record is not readily producible in the form or format sought
by the requester. Adverse determinations also include designations of
requesters' fee category, denials of fee waiver requests, or denials of
requests for expedited processing.
(iv) An adverse determination letter shall be signed and include:
(A) The names and titles or positions of each person responsible
for the adverse determination;
(B) A brief statement of the reasons for the adverse determination,
including any FOIA exemption applied by the official denying the
request;
(C) For records disclosed in part, markings or annotations to show
the applicable FOIA exemption(s) and the amount of information deleted,
unless doing so would harm an interest protected by an applicable
exemption. The location of the information deleted shall also be
indicated on the record, if feasible;
(D) An estimate of the volume of any records or information
withheld by providing the number of pages withheld in their entirety or
some other reasonable form of estimation. This estimate is not required
if the volume is otherwise indicated by deletions marked on the records
that are disclosed in part or if providing an estimate would harm an
interest protected by an applicable FOIA exemption;
(E) A statement that the adverse determination may be appealed
under paragraph (f) of this section, and a description of the
requirements for filing an administrative appeal set forth in that
paragraph; and
(F) A statement of the right of the requester to seek dispute
resolution services from the Office of FOIA Services' FOIA Public
Liaisons or the Office of Government Information Services (``OGIS'').
(3) Mediation services. OGIS offers mediation services to resolve
disputes between requesters and the Office of FOIA Services as a non-
exclusive alternative to litigation. Requesters with concerns about the
handling of their requests may contact OGIS.
(f) Administrative appeals--(1) Administrative review. If a
requester receives an adverse determination as described in paragraph
(e)(2)(iii) of this section, or the request has not been timely
determined within the time period prescribed in paragraph (d)(2) of
this section or within an extended period permitted under paragraph
(d)(5) of this section, the requester may file an appeal to the Office
of the General Counsel consistent with the procedures described in
paragraphs (f)(2) through (4) of this section. A requester generally
must submit a timely administrative appeal before seeking review by a
court of an adverse determination.
(2) Time limits. Appeals can be submitted in writing or
electronically, as described in paragraph (f)(3) of this section. The
appeal must be received within 90 calendar days of the date of the
written denial of the adverse determination and must be received no
later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on the 90th day. If the Office of
FOIA Services has not issued a determination on a request, an appeal
may be submitted any time after the statutory time period for
responding to a request ends.
(3) Contents of appeal. Appeals should be clearly and prominently
identified at the top of the first page as ``Freedom of Information Act
Appeal'' and should provide the assigned FOIA request number. The
appeal should include a copy of the original request and adverse
determination. Appeals should include a statement of the requester's
arguments as to why the records requested should be made available and
why the adverse determination was in error. If only a portion of the
adverse determination is appealed, the requester must specify which
part is being appealed.
(4) How to file and address an appeal. If submitted by U.S. mail or
delivery service, the appeal must be sent to the Office of FOIA
Services at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. Appeals may also be
made by facsimile at 202-772-9337, email ([email protected]), or online at
the Commission's website (https://www.sec.gov). A legible return address
must be included with the FOIA appeal. The requester may also include
other contact information, such as a telephone number and/or email
address.
(5) Adjudication of appeals. The Office of the General Counsel has
the authority to grant or deny all appeals, in whole or in part. In
appropriate cases the Office of the General Counsel may refer appeals
to the Commission for determination. No opportunity for personal
appearance, oral argument, or hearing on appeal is provided. Upon
receipt of an appeal, the Office of FOIA Services ordinarily will send
the requester an acknowledgment letter that confirms receipt of the
requester's appeal.
(6) Determinations on appeals. A determination on an appeal must be
made in writing. A determination that denies an appeal, in whole or in
part, shall include a brief explanation of the basis for the denial,
identify the applicable FOIA exemptions asserted, and describe why the
exemptions apply. As applicable, the determination will provide the
requester with notification of the statutory right to file a lawsuit in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4), and will inform the requester of
the mediation services offered by the Office of Government Information
Services as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. If the Office of
FOIA Services' determination is remanded or modified on appeal, the
Office of the General Counsel will notify the requester of that
determination in writing.
(g) Fees-- (1) In general. The Office of FOIA Services shall charge
fees for processing requests under the FOIA in accordance with the
provisions of this section and with the OMB Guidelines, except where
fees are limited under paragraph (g)(4) of this section or when a
waiver or reduction is granted under paragraph (g)(12) of this section.
To resolve any fee issues that arise under this section, the Office of
FOIA Services may contact a requester for additional information. The
Office of FOIA Services shall ensure that searches, review, and
duplication are conducted in an efficient manner. The Office of FOIA
Services ordinarily will collect all applicable fees before sending
copies of records to a requester. Requesters must pay fees by check,
certified check, or money order, or where possible, by electronic
payment.
(2) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(i) Commercial use request is a request from or on behalf of a
person who seeks information for a use or purpose that furthers his or
her commercial, trade, or profit interests, which can include
furthering those interests through litigation. The Office of FOIA
Services will determine whether to place a requester in the commercial
use category on a case-by-case basis based on the requester's intended
use of the information.
(ii) Direct costs are those expenses the Office of FOIA Services
and any staff within the divisions and offices of the Commission incur
in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of commercial use
requests, reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA request. Direct costs
include the salary of the employee(s) performing the work (i.e.,
[[Page 299]]
the basic rate of pay for the employee(s), plus 16% of that rate to
cover benefits), the cost of materials, and the cost of operating
computers and other electronic equipment, such as photocopiers and
scanners. Direct costs do not include overhead expenses such as the
costs of space and of heating or lighting a facility in which the
service is performed.
(iii) Duplication is reproducing a record, or the information
contained in it, to respond to a FOIA request. Copies can take the form
of paper, audiovisual materials, or electronic records, among others.
The Office of FOIA Services shall honor a requester's specified
preference of form or format of disclosure if the record is readily
reproducible with reasonable efforts in the requested form or format.
(iv) Educational institution is any school that operates a program
of scholarly research. A requester in this fee category must show that
the request is authorized by, and is made under the auspices of, an
educational institution and that the records are not sought for a
commercial use, but rather are sought to further scholarly research.
(v) Noncommercial scientific institution is an institution that is
not operated to further a commercial, trade, or profit interest and
that is operated solely for the purpose of conducting scientific
research, the results of which are not intended to promote any
particular product or industry. A requester in this category must show
that the request is authorized by and is made under the auspices of a
qualifying institution and that the records are sought to further
scientific research and are not for a commercial use.
(vi) Representative of the news media or news media requester is
any person or entity that is organized and operated to publish or
broadcast news to the public and that actively gathers information of
potential interest to a segment of the public, uses its editorial
skills to turn the raw materials into a distinct work, and distributes
that work to an audience. The term ``news'' means information that is
about current events or that would be of current interest to the
public. The Office of FOIA Services will determine whether to grant a
requester news media status on a case-by-case basis based upon the
requester's intended use of the requested material.
(vii) Review is the examination of a record located in response to
a request to determine whether any portion of it is exempt from
disclosure. Review time includes doing all that is necessary to prepare
the record for disclosure, such as redacting the record and marking any
applicable exemptions. Review time also includes time spent obtaining
and considering formal objections to disclosure made by a submitter
under Sec. 200.83, but it does not include time spent resolving legal
or policy issues regarding the application of exemptions.
(viii) Search is the review, manually or by automated means, of
agency records for the purpose of locating those records that are
responsive to a request. Search time includes page-by-page or line-by-
line identification of information within records and the reasonable
efforts expended to locate and retrieve information from electronic
records.
(3) Charging fees. In responding to FOIA requests, the Office of
FOIA Services shall charge the fees summarized in chart form in
paragraph (g)(3)(i) of this section and explained in paragraphs
(g)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section, unless fees are limited under
paragraph (g)(4) of this section or a waiver or reduction of fees has
been granted under paragraph (g)(12) of this section.
(i) The four categories of requesters and the chargeable fees for
each are:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requester category Search fees Review fees Duplication fees
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Commercial use requesters...... Yes................... Yes................... Yes.
(B) Educational and noncommercial No.................... No.................... Yes (first 100 pages, or
scientific institutions. equivalent volume, free).
(C) Representatives of the news No.................... No.................... Yes (first 100 pages, or
media. equivalent volume, free).
(D) All other requesters........... Yes (first 2 hours No.................... Yes (first 100 pages, or
free). equivalent volume, free).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) Search fees. (A) Search fees shall be charged for all
requests--other than requests made by educational institutions,
noncommercial scientific institutions, or representatives of the news
media--subject to the limitations of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.
The Office of FOIA Services may charge for time spent searching even if
no responsive records are located or it is determined that the records
are entirely exempt from disclosure. Search fees shall be the direct
costs of conducting the search by agency employees.
(B) Requesters shall be charged the direct costs associated with
conducting any search that requires the creation of a new computer
program to locate the requested records. Requesters shall be notified
of the costs associated with creating and implementing such a program
and must agree to pay the associated costs before the costs may be
incurred.
(C) For requests that require the retrieval of agency records
stored at a Federal records center operated by the National Archives
and Records Administration (``NARA''), additional costs shall be
charged in accordance with the Transactional Billing Rate Schedule
established by NARA.
(iii) Review fees. Review fees shall be charged to requesters who
make commercial use requests. Review fees shall be assessed in
connection with the initial review of the record, i.e., the review
agency employees conduct to determine whether an exemption applies to a
particular record or portion of a record. Also, if an exemption
asserted to withhold a record (or a portion thereof) is deemed to no
longer apply, any costs associated with the re-review of the records to
consider the use of other exemptions may be assessed as review fees.
Review fees shall be the direct costs of conducting the review by the
involved employees. Review fees can be charged even if the records
reviewed ultimately are not disclosed.
(iv) Search and review services (review applies to commercial-use
requesters only). (A) The Office of FOIA Services will establish and
charge average rates for the groups of employees' salary grades
typically involved in the search and review of records. Those groups
will consist of employees at:
(1) Grades SK-8 or below;
(2) Grades SK-9 to SK-13; and
(3) Grades SK-14 or above.
(B) The average rates will be based on the hourly salary (i.e.,
basic salary plus locality payment), plus 16 percent for benefits, of
employees who routinely perform search and review services. The average
hourly rates are listed on the FOIA web page of the Commission's
website at https://www.sec.gov and will be updated as salaries change.
Fees will
[[Page 300]]
be charged in quarter-hour increments. No search fee or review fee will
be charged for a quarter-hour period unless more than half of that
period is required for search or review.
(v) Duplication fees. Duplication fees shall be charged to all
requesters, subject to the limitations of paragraph (g)(4) of this
section. Fees for either a photocopy or printout of a record (no more
than one copy of which need be supplied) are identified on the FOIA web
page of the Commission's website at www.sec.gov. For copies of records
produced on tapes, disks, or other media, the Office of FOIA Services
shall charge the direct costs of producing the copy, including operator
time. Where paper documents must be scanned to comply with a
requester's preference to receive the records in an electronic format,
the requester shall pay the direct costs associated with scanning those
materials. For all other forms of duplication, the Office of FOIA
Services shall also charge the direct costs.
(4) Limitations on charging fees. (i) No search or review fees will
be charged for requests by educational institutions (unless the
requests are sought for a commercial use), noncommercial scientific
institutions, or representatives of the news media.
(ii) Except for requesters seeking records for a commercial use,
the Office of FOIA Services shall provide without charge the first 100
pages of duplication (or the cost equivalent for other media) and the
first two hours of search.
(iii) Fees will not be charged where the costs of collecting and
processing the fee are likely to equal or exceed the amount of the fee.
(iv) The Office of FOIA Services will not assess search fees (or,
in the case of requests from representatives of the news media or
educational or noncommercial scientific institutions, duplication fees)
when 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(viii) prohibits the assessment of those
fees.
(5) Notice of anticipated fees. (i) When the Office of FOIA
Services determines or estimates that the fees to be assessed in
accordance with this section will exceed the amount it would cost the
Office of FOIA Services to collect and process the fees, the Office of
FOIA Services shall notify the requester of the actual or estimated
amount of fees, unless the requester has indicated a willingness to pay
fees as high as the estimated fees. If only a portion of the fee can be
estimated readily, the Office of FOIA Services shall advise the
requester accordingly. If the requester is not a commercial use
requester, the notice shall specify that the requester is entitled to
the statutory entitlements of 100 pages of duplication at no charge
and, if the requester is charged search fees, two hours of search time
at no charge.
(ii) In cases in which a requester has been notified that the
actual or estimated fees will amount to more than it would cost the
Office of FOIA Services to collect and process the fees, or amount to
more than the amount the requester indicated a willingness to pay, the
Office of FOIA Services will do no further work on the request until
the requester commits in writing to pay the actual or estimated total
fee, or designates some amount of fees the requester is willing to pay,
or in the case of a requester who is not a commercial use requester
designates that the requester seeks only that which can be provided by
the statutory entitlements. The Office of FOIA Services will toll the
response period while it notifies the requester of the actual or
estimated amount of fees and this time will be excluded from the 20
working day time limit (as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section). The requester's agreement to pay fees must be made in
writing, must designate an exact dollar amount the requester is willing
to pay, and must be received within 30 calendar days from the date of
the notification of the fee estimate. If the requester fails to submit
an agreement to pay the anticipated fees within 30 calendar days from
the date of the Office of FOIA Services' fee notice, the Office of FOIA
Services will presume that the requester is no longer interested in the
records and notify the requester that the request has been closed.
(iii) The Office of FOIA Services shall make available their FOIA
Public Liaisons or other FOIA professionals to assist any requester in
reformulating a request to meet the requester's needs at a lower cost.
(6) Charges for other services. Although not required to provide
special services, if the Office of FOIA Services chooses to do so as a
matter of administrative discretion, the direct costs of providing the
service shall be charged. Examples of such special services include
certifying that records are true copies, providing multiple copies of
the same document, or sending records by means other than first class
mail. The cost for the attestation of records with the Commission seal
(i.e., certifying records as true copies) is $4.00 per record, which
may be waived for records certified electronically. Requests for
certified copies of records or documents shall ordinarily be serviced
within 20 working days. Requests will be processed in the order in
which they are received.
(7) Charging interest. The Office of FOIA Services may begin to
charge interest on any unpaid bill starting on the 31st calendar day
following the date of billing the requester. Interest charges shall be
assessed at the rate provided in 31 U.S.C. 3717 and accrue from the
date of the billing until the payment is received. The Office of FOIA
Services shall take all steps authorized by the Debt Collection Act of
1982, as amended, and the Commission's Rules Relating to Debt
Collection to effect payment, including offset, disclosure to consumer
reporting agencies, and use of collection agencies.
(8) Aggregating requests. If the Office of FOIA Services reasonably
believes that a requester or a group of requesters acting in concert is
attempting to divide a request into a series of requests for the
purpose of avoiding fees, the Office of FOIA Services may aggregate
those requests and charge accordingly. Among the factors the Office of
FOIA Services shall consider in deciding whether to aggregate are
whether the requests were submitted close in time and whether the
requests seek documents about related matters. The Office of FOIA
Services may presume that multiple requests that involve related
matters made by the same requester or a group of requesters within a 30
calendar day period have been made to avoid fees. For requests
separated by a longer period, the Office of FOIA Services will
aggregate them only where it determines that aggregation is warranted
in view of all the circumstances involved.
(9) Advance payments. (i) For requests other than those described
in paragraphs (g)(9)(ii) and (iii) of this section, the Office of FOIA
Services shall not require a requester to make advance payment (i.e.,
payment made before the Office of FOIA Services begins to process or
continues to work on a request). Payment owed for work already
completed (i.e., payment before copies are sent to a requester) is not
an advance payment.
(ii) When the Office of FOIA Services determines or estimates that
a total fee to be charged under this section will exceed $250.00, it
shall notify the requester of the actual or estimated fee and may
require the requester to make an advance payment of the entire
anticipated fee before beginning to process the request. A notice under
this paragraph shall offer the requester an opportunity to discuss the
matter with the Office of FOIA Services' FOIA Public Liaisons or other
FOIA professionals to modify the request in
[[Page 301]]
an effort to meet the requester's needs at a lower cost.
(iii) When a requester has previously failed to pay a properly
charged FOIA fee to the Office of FOIA Services or other Federal agency
within 30 calendar days of the date of billing, the Office of FOIA
Services shall notify the requester that he or she is required to pay
the full amount due, plus any applicable interest, and to make an
advance payment of the full amount of any anticipated fee, before the
Office of FOIA Services begins to process a new request or continues
processing a pending request from that requester. Where the Office of
FOIA Services has a reasonable basis to believe that a requester has
misrepresented the requester's identity to avoid paying outstanding
fees, it may require that the requester provide proof of identity and
pay in advance.
(iv) When the Office of FOIA Services requires advance payment or
payment due under paragraphs (g)(9)(ii) and (iii) of this section, the
Office of FOIA Services will not further process the request until the
required payment is made. The Office of FOIA Services will toll the
processing of the request while it notifies the requester of the
advanced payment due and this time will be excluded from the 20 working
day time limit (as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section). If
the requester does not pay the advance payment within 30 calendar days
from the date of the Office of FOIA Services' fee notice, the Office of
FOIA Services will presume that the requester is no longer interested
in the records and notify the requester that the request has been
closed.
(10) Tolling. When necessary for the Office of FOIA Services to
clarify issues regarding fee assessment with the requester, the time
limit for responding to a FOIA request is tolled until the Office of
FOIA Services resolves such issues with the requester.
(11) Other statutes specifically providing for fees. The fee
schedule of this section does not apply to fees charged under any
statute (except the FOIA) that specifically requires an agency to set
and collect fees for particular types of records. In instances where
records responsive to a request are subject to a statutorily-based fee
schedule program, the Office of FOIA Services shall inform the
requester how to obtain records from that program. Provision of such
records is not handled under the FOIA.
(12) Requirements for waiver or reduction of fees. (i) Records
responsive to a request will be furnished without charge, or at a
charge reduced below that established under paragraph (g)(3) of this
section, if the requester asks for such a waiver in writing and the
Office of FOIA Services determines, after consideration of information
provided by the requester, that the requester has demonstrated that:
(A) Disclosure of the requested information is in the public
interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public
understanding of the operations or activities of the government; and
(B) Disclosure of the information is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.
(ii) In deciding whether disclosure of the requested information is
likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the
operations or activities of the government, the Office of FOIA Services
shall consider all four of the following factors:
(A) The subject of the request: Whether the subject of the
requested records concerns the operations or activities of the
government. The subject of the requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of the Federal Government, with a
connection that is direct and clear, not remote or attenuated.
(B) The informative value of the information to be disclosed:
Whether the disclosure is likely to contribute to an understanding of
government operations or activities. The disclosable portions of the
requested records must be meaningfully informative about government
operations or activities to be likely to contribute to an increased
public understanding of those operations or activities. The disclosure
of information that already is in the public domain, in either a
duplicative or a substantially identical form, would not be likely to
contribute to such understanding.
(C) The contribution to an understanding of the subject by the
public likely to result from disclosure: Whether disclosure of the
requested information will contribute to the understanding of a
reasonably broad audience of persons interested in the subject, as
opposed to the individual understanding of the requester. A requester's
expertise in the subject area and ability and intention to effectively
convey information to the public shall be considered. It shall be
presumed that a representative of the news media satisfies this
consideration.
(D) The significance of the contribution to public understanding:
Whether the disclosure is likely to contribute significantly to public
understanding of government operations or activities. The public's
understanding of the subject in question prior to the disclosure must
be significantly enhanced by the disclosure.
(iii) In deciding whether disclosure of the requested information
is primarily in the commercial interest of the requester, the Office of
FOIA Services shall consider the following factors:
(A) The existence and magnitude of a commercial interest: Whether
the requester has a commercial interest that would be furthered by the
requested disclosure. The Office of FOIA Services shall consider any
commercial interest of the requester (with reference to the definition
of ``commercial use requester'' in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this
section), or of any person on whose behalf the requester may be acting,
that would be furthered by the requested disclosure. Requesters shall
be given an opportunity to provide explanatory information regarding
this consideration.
(B) The primary interest in disclosure: Whether the public interest
is greater than any identified commercial interest in disclosure. The
Office of FOIA Services ordinarily shall presume that where a news
media requester has satisfied the public interest standard, the public
interest will be the interest primarily served by disclosure to that
requester. Disclosure to data brokers or others who merely compile and
market government information for direct economic return shall not be
presumed to primarily serve the public interest.
(iv) If only a portion of the requested records satisfies both the
requirements for a waiver or reduction of fees, a waiver or reduction
of fees will be granted for only that portion.
(v) Requests for a waiver or reduction of fees should address all
the factors identified in paragraphs (g)(12)(ii) and (iii) of this
section.
(vi) Denials of requests for a waiver or reduction of fees are
adverse determinations (as defined in paragraph (e)(2)(iii) of this
section) and may be appealed to the General Counsel in accordance with
the procedures set forth in paragraph (f) of this section.
Sec. 200.80a [Removed]
0
3. Remove Sec. 200.80a.
Sec. 200.80b [Removed]
0
4. Remove Sec. 200.80b.
Sec. 200.80c [Removed]
0
5. Remove Sec. 200.80c.
Sec. 200.80d [Removed]
0
6. Remove Sec. 200.80d.
Sec. 200.80e [Removed]
0
7. Remove Sec. 200.80e.
[[Page 302]]
Sec. 200.80f [Removed]
0
8. Remove Sec. 200.80f.
By the Commission.
Dated: December 21, 2017.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-27967 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P