Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Related to The Options Clearing Corporation's Collateral Risk Management Policy, 60252-60253 [2017-27230]
Download as PDF
60252
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 19, 2017 / Notices
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of LCH SA and on LCH SA’s
website at https://www.lch.com/assetclasses/cdsclear.
All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not
redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer
to File Number SR–LCH SA–2017–012
and should be submitted on or before
January 9, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–27235 Filed 12–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
2:00 p.m. on Thursday,
December 21, 2017.
PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing
Room 10800.
STATUS: This meeting will be closed to
the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the closed meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters also may be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B)
and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3),
(a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and
(a)(10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
Commissioner Stein, as duty officer,
voted to consider the items listed for the
closed meeting in closed session.
The subject matters of the closed
meeting will be:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
18 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Dec 18, 2017
Jkt 244001
Dated: December 14, 2017.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–27359 Filed 12–15–17; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82311; File No. SR–OCC–
2017–008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change
Related to The Options Clearing
Corporation’s Collateral Risk
Management Policy
December 13, 2017.
Sunshine Act Meetings
TIME AND DATE:
Institution and settlement of
injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings;
Resolution of litigation claims; and
Other matters relating to enforcement
proceedings.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
For further information and to ascertain
what, if any, matters have been added,
deleted or postponed; please contact
Brent J. Fields from the Office of the
Secretary at (202) 551–5400.
I. Introduction
On October 27, 2017, the Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change (SR–OCC–2017–008) to
formalize and update OCC’s Collateral
Risk Management Policy. The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on November 9,
2017.3 The Commission received one
comment letter regarding the proposed
change.4 For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is approving the
proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
This proposed rule change would
formalize and update OCC’s Collateral
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82009
(Nov. 3, 2017), 82 FR 52079 (Nov. 9, 2017) (SR–
OCC–2017–008) (‘‘Notice’’).
4 Letter from Michael Kitlas, dated November 3,
2017. See comments on the proposed rule change
(SR–OCC–2017–008), https://www.sec.gov/
comments/sr-occ-2017-008/occ2017008.htm.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Risk Management Policy (‘‘CRM
Policy’’). The CRM Policy describes the
categories of risk that are considered by
OCC in determining which asset classes
should be acceptable forms of collateral
as margin assets and Clearing Fund
contributions. OCC’s assessment of an
asset class generally includes an
evaluation of credit risk, liquidity risk,
and market risk.5 With respect to credit
risk, the CRM Policy requires OCC staff
to evaluate the creditworthiness of
counterparties, including custodial
agents and settlement banks and to
monitor the health of such
counterparties on an ongoing basis.6
Regarding liquidity risk, OCC gives no
value to a participant for its own (or its
affiliate’s) debt or equity securities, and
limits the amount of a particular asset
type that a participant may pledge
under the CRM Policy.7 With respect to
market risks, the CRM Policy provides
that eligible asset classes are accepted
after consideration of their liquidity,
price transparency, price volatility,
offset potential with contracts cleared
by OCC, modeling implications and
projected inventories.8
The CRM Policy describes OCC’s
approach to valuing collateral and
setting and applying haircuts. OCC’s
pricing information, as described in the
CRM Policy, feeds into OCC’s processes
for establishing haircuts, daily mark-tomarket valuation of collateral, and
intraday valuation of collateral. Given
the importance of pricing data to inform
these processes, OCC maintains
redundant information feeds from
multiple sources to help ensure
accuracy and quality.9
The CRM Policy also summarizes
OCC’s two approaches for valuing
collateral: Collateral in Margins (‘‘CiM’’)
and haircuts.10 Under the CiM
approach, the current market value of
margin assets is included as a positive
asset value in the calculation of a
portfolio’s net asset value within OCC’s
System for Theoretical Analysis and
Numerical Simulations (‘‘STANS’’).
OCC then offsets this positive asset
value based on, among other things, the
expected shortfall and stress test charges
associated with an account, resulting in
a net excess or net deficit.11 For
collateral that is not managed using the
CiM process, the CRM Policy provides
that OCC subjects such collateral to
percentage haircuts established at the
5 Notice,
82 FR at 52080.
6 Id.
7 Id.
8 Id.
9 Notice,
82 FR at 52080–81.
82 FR at 52081.
11 Notice, 82 FR at 52081, note 23.
10 Notice,
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 19, 2017 / Notices
time the collateral is accepted by OCC
and that are monitored regularly to help
ensure the haircuts remain adequate.12
Additionally, the CRM Policy
provides that OCC’s Credit and
Liquidity Working Group must review
the policy’s performance and adequacy
on at least an annual basis, including
with respect to collateral eligibility,
concentration limits, collateral haircuts
and monitoring processes.13
III. Summary of Comment Received
The Commission received one
comment letter in response to the
proposed rule change.14 The commenter
stated that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Act.15
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
IV. Discussion and Commission
Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs
the Commission to approve a proposed
rule change of a self-regulatory
organization if it finds that such
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization.16 After
carefully considering the proposed rule
change and the comment letter, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
OCC. More specifically, the Commission
finds that the proposal is consistent
with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act and
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(5) under the Act.
A. Consistency With Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
requires that the rules of a registered
clearing agency be designed to do,
among other things, the following: (1)
Promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions; (2) assure the safeguarding
of securities and funds which are in the
custody or control of the clearing agency
or for which it is responsible; and (3) in
general protect investors and the public
interest.17
The CRM Policy describes OCC’s
process for limiting the collateral that it
accepts to assets with low credit,
liquidity, and market risk. The
acceptance of only low-risk collateral
increases the likelihood that such
collateral can be liquidated in a timely
manner, thereby enhancing OCC’s
ability to continue to perform its critical
12 Notice,
82 FR at 52081.
13 Id.
14 See
services for the financial markets while
also managing a default. The CRM
Policy also describes how OCC haircuts
such collateral, and requires review of
such haircuts at least annually. Ensuring
that collateral haircuts are appropriately
set and reviewed on a regular basis
increases the likelihood that OCC will
collect and hold collateral that can be
liquidated at a value at or above the
value attributed to it. This approach
thereby increases the likelihood that
OCC will be able to continue to meet its
settlement obligations and manage the
default of a clearing member by
liquidating the defaulting clearing
member’s collateral in a timely and
effective manner.
The timely liquidation of collateral at
or above the expected value would,
therefore, support OCC’s ability to
continue to meet settlement obligations
on time, promoting the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions. In addition,
being able to successfully liquidate
collateral in a timely and effective
manner would reduce the likelihood of
OCC having to draw on mutualized
resources, including Clearing Fund
contributions. As such, the Commission
believes that the proposal would help
assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds which are in the custody or
control of OCC, or for which OCC is
responsible. As a result, the
Commission also finds that the
proposed rule change, in general,
protects investors and the public
interest. Accordingly, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 17A of the
Act.18
B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad–22(e)(3)
of the Act
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(5) requires that a
covered clearing agency establish,
implement, maintain and enforce
written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to limit the assets
it accepts as collateral to those with low
credit, liquidity, and market risks; set
and enforce appropriately conservative
haircuts and concentration limits if the
covered clearing agency requires
collateral to manage its or its
participants’ credit exposure; and,
require a review of the sufficiency of its
collateral haircuts and concentration
limits to be performed not less than
annually.19
As discussed above, the proposed
CRM Policy would address each
component of Rule 17Ad–22(e)(5).20
supra note 4.
15 Id.
18 15
16 15
19 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
17 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Dec 18, 2017
U.S.C. 78q–1.
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(5).
20 Id.
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60253
First, the proposed CRM Policy requires
that, in determining forms of collateral
as margin assets and Clearing Fund
contributions, OCC evaluates the
market, credit, and liquidity risk of an
asset class. Second, the CRM Policy
provides for the maintenance of
redundant pricing information feeds
from multiple sources to ensure the
availability of information that is critical
to OCC’s daily and intraday processes
for collateral valuation. The CRM Policy
further describes OCC’s processes for
setting haircuts either via the use of
STANS or percentage-based haircuts.
Third, the proposed CRM requires at
least annual review of concentration
limits and collateral haircuts. The
Commission finds, therefore, that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(5).21
V. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act, and in
particular, with the requirements of
Section 17A of the Act 22 and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act that the
proposed rule change (SR–OCC–2017–
008) be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.23
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–27230 Filed 12–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–420, OMB Control No.
3235–0479]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736.
Extension:
Rule 15c2–7
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
21 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(5).
approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
23 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
22 In
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60252-60253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27230]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82311; File No. SR-OCC-2017-008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Related to The Options Clearing
Corporation's Collateral Risk Management Policy
December 13, 2017.
I. Introduction
On October 27, 2017, the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change (SR-
OCC-2017-008) to formalize and update OCC's Collateral Risk Management
Policy. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on November 9, 2017.\3\ The Commission received one
comment letter regarding the proposed change.\4\ For the reasons
discussed below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82009 (Nov. 3, 2017), 82
FR 52079 (Nov. 9, 2017) (SR-OCC-2017-008) (``Notice'').
\4\ Letter from Michael Kitlas, dated November 3, 2017. See
comments on the proposed rule change (SR-OCC-2017-008), https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-occ-2017-008/occ2017008.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
This proposed rule change would formalize and update OCC's
Collateral Risk Management Policy (``CRM Policy''). The CRM Policy
describes the categories of risk that are considered by OCC in
determining which asset classes should be acceptable forms of
collateral as margin assets and Clearing Fund contributions. OCC's
assessment of an asset class generally includes an evaluation of credit
risk, liquidity risk, and market risk.\5\ With respect to credit risk,
the CRM Policy requires OCC staff to evaluate the creditworthiness of
counterparties, including custodial agents and settlement banks and to
monitor the health of such counterparties on an ongoing basis.\6\
Regarding liquidity risk, OCC gives no value to a participant for its
own (or its affiliate's) debt or equity securities, and limits the
amount of a particular asset type that a participant may pledge under
the CRM Policy.\7\ With respect to market risks, the CRM Policy
provides that eligible asset classes are accepted after consideration
of their liquidity, price transparency, price volatility, offset
potential with contracts cleared by OCC, modeling implications and
projected inventories.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Notice, 82 FR at 52080.
\6\ Id.
\7\ Id.
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CRM Policy describes OCC's approach to valuing collateral and
setting and applying haircuts. OCC's pricing information, as described
in the CRM Policy, feeds into OCC's processes for establishing
haircuts, daily mark-to-market valuation of collateral, and intraday
valuation of collateral. Given the importance of pricing data to inform
these processes, OCC maintains redundant information feeds from
multiple sources to help ensure accuracy and quality.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Notice, 82 FR at 52080-81.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CRM Policy also summarizes OCC's two approaches for valuing
collateral: Collateral in Margins (``CiM'') and haircuts.\10\ Under the
CiM approach, the current market value of margin assets is included as
a positive asset value in the calculation of a portfolio's net asset
value within OCC's System for Theoretical Analysis and Numerical
Simulations (``STANS''). OCC then offsets this positive asset value
based on, among other things, the expected shortfall and stress test
charges associated with an account, resulting in a net excess or net
deficit.\11\ For collateral that is not managed using the CiM process,
the CRM Policy provides that OCC subjects such collateral to percentage
haircuts established at the
[[Page 60253]]
time the collateral is accepted by OCC and that are monitored regularly
to help ensure the haircuts remain adequate.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Notice, 82 FR at 52081.
\11\ Notice, 82 FR at 52081, note 23.
\12\ Notice, 82 FR at 52081.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the CRM Policy provides that OCC's Credit and
Liquidity Working Group must review the policy's performance and
adequacy on at least an annual basis, including with respect to
collateral eligibility, concentration limits, collateral haircuts and
monitoring processes.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Summary of Comment Received
The Commission received one comment letter in response to the
proposed rule change.\14\ The commenter stated that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See supra note 4.
\15\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Discussion and Commission Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such
organization.\16\ After carefully considering the proposed rule change
and the comment letter, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to OCC. More specifically, the
Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act and Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5) under the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires that the rules of a
registered clearing agency be designed to do, among other things, the
following: (1) Promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement
of securities transactions; (2) assure the safeguarding of securities
and funds which are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or
for which it is responsible; and (3) in general protect investors and
the public interest.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CRM Policy describes OCC's process for limiting the collateral
that it accepts to assets with low credit, liquidity, and market risk.
The acceptance of only low-risk collateral increases the likelihood
that such collateral can be liquidated in a timely manner, thereby
enhancing OCC's ability to continue to perform its critical services
for the financial markets while also managing a default. The CRM Policy
also describes how OCC haircuts such collateral, and requires review of
such haircuts at least annually. Ensuring that collateral haircuts are
appropriately set and reviewed on a regular basis increases the
likelihood that OCC will collect and hold collateral that can be
liquidated at a value at or above the value attributed to it. This
approach thereby increases the likelihood that OCC will be able to
continue to meet its settlement obligations and manage the default of a
clearing member by liquidating the defaulting clearing member's
collateral in a timely and effective manner.
The timely liquidation of collateral at or above the expected value
would, therefore, support OCC's ability to continue to meet settlement
obligations on time, promoting the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions. In addition, being able to
successfully liquidate collateral in a timely and effective manner
would reduce the likelihood of OCC having to draw on mutualized
resources, including Clearing Fund contributions. As such, the
Commission believes that the proposal would help assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or
control of OCC, or for which OCC is responsible. As a result, the
Commission also finds that the proposed rule change, in general,
protects investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A of
the Act.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(3) of the Act
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5) requires that a covered clearing agency
establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to limit the assets it accepts as
collateral to those with low credit, liquidity, and market risks; set
and enforce appropriately conservative haircuts and concentration
limits if the covered clearing agency requires collateral to manage its
or its participants' credit exposure; and, require a review of the
sufficiency of its collateral haircuts and concentration limits to be
performed not less than annually.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed above, the proposed CRM Policy would address each
component of Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5).\20\ First, the proposed CRM Policy
requires that, in determining forms of collateral as margin assets and
Clearing Fund contributions, OCC evaluates the market, credit, and
liquidity risk of an asset class. Second, the CRM Policy provides for
the maintenance of redundant pricing information feeds from multiple
sources to ensure the availability of information that is critical to
OCC's daily and intraday processes for collateral valuation. The CRM
Policy further describes OCC's processes for setting haircuts either
via the use of STANS or percentage-based haircuts. Third, the proposed
CRM requires at least annual review of concentration limits and
collateral haircuts. The Commission finds, therefore, that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5).\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Id.
\21\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed change is consistent with the requirements of the Act, and in
particular, with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \22\ and
the rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
that the proposed rule change (SR-OCC-2017-008) be, and hereby is,
approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-27230 Filed 12-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P