Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 57428-57430 [2017-26165]

Download as PDF 57428 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Notices As a result of the determination by the Department of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on high pressure steel cylinders (Steel Cylinders) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD and CVD orders. DATES: Applicable December 5, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Kennedy, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, or Paul Walker, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7883 and (202) 482–0413, respectively. SUMMARY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES On June 21, 2012, the Department published in the Federal Register the AD and CVD orders on Steel Cylinders from the PRC.1 On May 1, 2017, the Department published the notice of initiation of the first sunset reviews of the AD and CVD orders on Steel Cylinders 2 from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On May 1, 2017, the ITC instituted its review of the orders.3 As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, the Department determined that revocation of the AD order on Steel Cylinders from the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that revocation of the CVD order on Steel Cylinders from the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of of countervailable subsidies. The Department, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the dumping margins and countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail should the AD and CVD orders be revoked.4 1 See High Pressure Steel Cylinders from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 37377 (June 21, 2012) (AD Order); see also High Pressure Steel Cylinders from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 77 FR 37384 (June 21, 2012) (CVD Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year ‘‘Sunset’’ Review, 82 FR 20314 (May 1, 2017). 3 See High Pressure Steel Cylinders from China, 82 FR 20373 (May 1, 2017). 4 See High Pressure Steel Cylinders from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 41607 (September 1, 2017); see VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Dec 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 On November 3, 2017, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, the ITC published a notice of its determination that revocation of the AD and CVD orders on Steel Cylinders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.5 Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these orders is seamless steel cylinders designed for storage or transport of compressed or liquefied gas (high pressure steel cylinders). High pressure steel cylinders are fabricated of chrome alloy steel including, but not limited to, chromium-molybdenum steel or chromium magnesium steel, and have permanently impressed into the steel, either before or after importation, the symbol of a U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (DOT)approved high pressure steel cylinder manufacturer, as well as an approved DOT type marking of DOT 3A, 3AX, 3AA, 3AAX, 3B, 3E, 3HT, 3T, or DOT– E (followed by a specific exemption number) in accordance with the requirements of sections 178.36 through 178.68 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or any subsequent amendments thereof. High pressure steel cylinders covered by these investigations have a water capacity up to 450 liters, and a gas capacity ranging from 8 to 702 cubic feet, regardless of corresponding service pressure levels and regardless of physical dimensions, finish or coatings. Excluded from the scope of these orders are high pressure steel cylinders manufactured to UN–ISO–9809–1 and 2 specifications and permanently impressed with ISO or UN symbols. Also excluded from the investigation are acetylene cylinders, with or without internal porous mass, and permanently impressed with 8A or 8AL in accordance with DOT regulations. Merchandise covered by these orders is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheading 7311.00.00.30. Subject merchandise may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7311.00.00.60 or 7311.00.00.90. Although the HTSUS subheadings are also High Pressure Steel Cylinders from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 82 FR 41936 (September 5, 2017). 5 See High Pressure Steel Cylinders from China, 82 FR 51290 (November 3, 2017) and ITC Publication titled Steel Cylinders from the PRC: Investigation No. 701–480 (First Review) (October 31, 2017). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under the investigation is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of the AD and CVD orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), the Department hereby orders the continuation of the AD and CVD orders on Steel Cylinders from the PRC. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of these orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of these orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: November 29, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017–26164 Filed 12–4–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–475–818] Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–2016 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 3, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review of certain pasta (pasta) from Italy. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. As a result of our analysis of the comments and information received, AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Notices these final results differ from the Preliminary Results with respect to Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (collectively, Ghigi/Zara).1 For the final weighted-average dumping margins, see the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section below. DATES: Applicable December 5, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang (Ghigi/Zara) or George McMahon (Indalco), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1168 or (202) 482–1167, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 3, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the Preliminary Results.2 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. On September 5, 2017, the petitioners and Ghigi/Zara submitted their case briefs. On September 11, 2017, the petitioners and Ghigi/Zara submitted their rebuttal briefs.3 On September 5, 2017 Ghigi/ Zara submitted a request for a hearing, which it withdrew on October 20, 2017.4 Scope of the Order sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Imports covered by the order are shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta. The merchandise subject to review is currently classifiable under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.5 1 See Memorandum titled ‘‘2015–2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Pasta from Italy: Ghigi and Zara Collapsing Memorandum,’’ dated July 31, 2017. 2 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015– 2016, 82 FR 36126 (August 3, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 3 See Petitioners’ case brief, dated September 5, 2017, Ghigi/Zara’s case brief, dated September 5, 2017, Petitioners’ rebuttal brief, dated September 11, 2017 and Ghigi/Zara’s rebuttal brief, dated September 11, 2017. 4 See letter titled ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Request for a Hearing,’’ dated September 5, 2017; see also letter titled ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Withdrawal of Request for Hearing,’’ dated October 20, 2017. 5 For a full description of the scope of the order, see the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Pasta from Italy; 2014–2015’’, dated concurrently with this VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Dec 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we have recalculated Ghigi/ Zara’s weighted-average dumping margin.6 As a result of the recalculation of the rate for Ghigi/Zara, the weightedaverage dumping margin for the nonselected companies has changed. The weighted-average dumping margin for Indalco remains unchanged from the Preliminary Results. Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, the Department calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin that is above de minimis for Ghigi/Zara and a de minimis margin for Indalco for the period July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. Therefore, in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the Department assigned the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated for Ghigi/Zara to the four non-selected companies in these final results, as referenced below. notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum) and incorporated herein by reference. 6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from Joy Zhang, Case Analyst, Office III, titled ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Calculation Memorandum—Liguori,’’ dated concurrently with this notice, and Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from George McMahon, Case Analyst, Office III, titled ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Calculation Memorandum—Indalco,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Producer and/or exporter Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (Zara) (collectively Ghigi/Zara) 7 ............................ Industria Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco) ....................... GR.A.M.M. S.r.l. ......................... Pastificio Andalini S.p.A. (Andalini) ................................. Pastificio Zaffiri S.r.l. (Zaffiri) ...... Tesa SrL (Tesa) ......................... 57429 Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 5.30 0.00 5.30 5.30 5.30 5.30 Duty Assessment The Department shall determine and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.8 For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final results of this administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates calculated in the final results are above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), the Department will issue instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries. Where either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. In accordance with the Department’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which it did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days 7 See Memorandum titled ‘‘2015–2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Pasta from Italy: Ghigi and Zara Collapsing Memorandum,’’ dated July 31, 2017. 8 In these final results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1 57430 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Notices after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all-others rate established in the antidumping investigation as modified by the section 129 determination. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Dec 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: November 29, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. List of Comments V. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether to Include Expenses Related to Contract Cancellation Charges in Ghigi’s General and Administrative (G&A) Expense Calculation Comment 2: Whether to Adjust Zara’s G&A Expense Calculation to Reclassify Certain Expenses Comment 3: Whether to Revise Manufacturer Field Coding Comment 4: Whether to Revise Differential Pricing Methodology VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017–26165 Filed 12–4–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Intent To Extend Collection 3038–0066: Financial Resource Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations Commodity Futures Trading Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed extension of a collection of certain information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and to allow 60 days for public comment. This notice solicits comments on certain SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 financial resource reporting requirements applicable to derivatives clearing organizations. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 5, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ‘‘OMB Control Number 3038–0066’’ by any of the following methods: • The Agency’s Web site, at http:// comments.cftc.gov/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments through the Web site. • Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581. • Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as Mail above. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments through the Portal. Please submit your comments using only one method. All comments must be submitted in English or, if not, accompanied by an English translation. Comments will be posted as received to http://www.cftc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jocelyn Partridge, Special Counsel, Division of Clearing and Risk, (202) 418–5926, email: jpartridge@cftc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA, Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of Information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3 and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires a Federal agency to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, the Commission is publishing notice of the proposed extension of the collection of information listed below. Title: Financial Resource Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations (OMB Control No. 3038– 0066). This is a request for an extension E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57428-57430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-475-818]


Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On August 3, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the antidumping duty 
administrative review of certain pasta (pasta) from Italy. The period 
of review (POR) is July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. As a result of 
our analysis of the comments and information received,

[[Page 57429]]

these final results differ from the Preliminary Results with respect to 
Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (collectively, Ghigi/Zara).\1\ 
For the final weighted-average dumping margins, see the ``Final Results 
of Review'' section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Memorandum titled ``2015-2016 Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Certain Pasta from Italy: Ghigi and Zara 
Collapsing Memorandum,'' dated July 31, 2017.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Applicable December 5, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang (Ghigi/Zara) or George 
McMahon (Indalco), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 
telephone: (202) 482-1168 or (202) 482-1167, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On August 3, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the Preliminary Results.\2\ In accordance with 19 CFR 
351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to comment on our Preliminary 
Results. On September 5, 2017, the petitioners and Ghigi/Zara submitted 
their case briefs. On September 11, 2017, the petitioners and Ghigi/
Zara submitted their rebuttal briefs.\3\ On September 5, 2017 Ghigi/
Zara submitted a request for a hearing, which it withdrew on October 
20, 2017.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 36126 
(August 3, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.
    \3\ See Petitioners' case brief, dated September 5, 2017, Ghigi/
Zara's case brief, dated September 5, 2017, Petitioners' rebuttal 
brief, dated September 11, 2017 and Ghigi/Zara's rebuttal brief, 
dated September 11, 2017.
    \4\ See letter titled ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Request for a 
Hearing,'' dated September 5, 2017; see also letter titled ``Certain 
Pasta from Italy: Withdrawal of Request for Hearing,'' dated October 
20, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    Imports covered by the order are shipments of certain non-egg dry 
pasta. The merchandise subject to review is currently classifiable 
under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings 
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written 
description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the 
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission: 
Certain Pasta from Italy; 2014-2015'', dated concurrently with this 
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum) and incorporated herein by 
reference.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we 
responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records 
Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we have 
recalculated Ghigi/Zara's weighted-average dumping margin.\6\ As a 
result of the recalculation of the rate for Ghigi/Zara, the weighted-
average dumping margin for the non-selected companies has changed. The 
weighted-average dumping margin for Indalco remains unchanged from the 
Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Memorandum to 
the File, Through Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, 
from Joy Zhang, Case Analyst, Office III, titled ``Certain Pasta 
from Italy: Calculation Memorandum--Liguori,'' dated concurrently 
with this notice, and Memorandum to the File, Through Eric B. 
Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, from George McMahon, Case 
Analyst, Office III, titled ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Calculation 
Memorandum--Indalco,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, the Department calculated a weighted-
average dumping margin that is above de minimis for Ghigi/Zara and a de 
minimis margin for Indalco for the period July 1, 2015, through June 
30, 2016. Therefore, in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the 
Act, the Department assigned the weighted-average dumping margin 
calculated for Ghigi/Zara to the four non-selected companies in these 
final results, as referenced below.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                  Producer and/or exporter                      dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (Zara) (collectively        5.30
 Ghigi/Zara) \7\............................................
Industria Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco)..............        0.00
GR.A.M.M. S.r.l.............................................        5.30
Pastificio Andalini S.p.A. (Andalini).......................        5.30
Pastificio Zaffiri S.r.l. (Zaffiri).........................        5.30
Tesa SrL (Tesa).............................................        5.30
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Duty Assessment

    The Department shall determine and Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\8\ 
For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping 
margin is above de minimis, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem 
duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value 
of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon 
issuance of the final results of this administrative review, if any 
importer-specific assessment rates calculated in the final results are 
above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), the Department will 
issue instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on 
appropriate entries. Where either the respondent's weighted-average 
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific 
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum titled ``2015-2016 Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Certain Pasta from Italy: Ghigi and Zara 
Collapsing Memorandum,'' dated July 31, 2017.
    \8\ In these final results, the Department applied the 
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping 
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with the Department's ``automatic assessment'' 
practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by 
each respondent for which it did not know that its merchandise was 
destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
    We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days

[[Page 57430]]

after publication of the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) 
of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will 
be the rate established in the final results of this administrative 
review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not 
covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of 
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company 
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a 
prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, 
the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most 
recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of 
the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all-
others rate established in the antidumping investigation as modified by 
the section 129 determination. These cash deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and 
the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: November 29, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. List of Comments
V. Analysis of Comments
    Comment 1: Whether to Include Expenses Related to Contract 
Cancellation Charges in Ghigi's General and Administrative (G&A) 
Expense Calculation
    Comment 2: Whether to Adjust Zara's G&A Expense Calculation to 
Reclassify Certain Expenses
    Comment 3: Whether to Revise Manufacturer Field Coding
    Comment 4: Whether to Revise Differential Pricing Methodology
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2017-26165 Filed 12-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P