Monosodium Glutamate From Indonesia: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 57221-57223 [2017-26063]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Notices
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may
request in writing that the Secretary
conduct an administrative review. For
both antidumping and countervailing
duty reviews, the interested party must
specify the individual producers or
exporters covered by an antidumping
finding or an antidumping or
countervailing duty order or suspension
agreement for which it is requesting a
review. In addition, a domestic
interested party or an interested party
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary
to review those particular producers or
exporters. If the interested party intends
for the Secretary to review sales of
merchandise by an exporter (or a
producer if that producer also exports
merchandise from other suppliers)
which was produced in more than one
country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then
the interested party must state
specifically, on an order-by-order basis,
which exporter(s) the request is
intended to cover.
Note that, for any party the
Department was unable to locate in
prior segments, the Department will not
accept a request for an administrative
review of that party absent new
information as to the party’s location.
Moreover, if the interested party who
files a request for review is unable to
locate the producer or exporter for
which it requested the review, the
interested party must provide an
explanation of the attempts it made to
locate the producer or exporter at the
same time it files its request for review,
in order for the Secretary to determine
if the interested party’s attempts were
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011), the Department
clarified its practice with respect to the
collection of final antidumping duties
on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders.2
The Department no longer considers
the non-market economy (NME) entity
2 See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web
site at https://trade.gov/enforcement/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
as an exporter conditionally subject to
an antidumping duty administrative
reviews.3 Accordingly, the NME entity
will not be under review unless the
Department specifically receives a
request for, or self-initiates, a review of
the NME entity.4 In administrative
reviews of antidumping duty orders on
merchandise from NME countries where
a review of the NME entity has not been
initiated, but where an individual
exporter for which a review was
initiated does not qualify for a separate
rate, the Department will issue a final
decision indicating that the company in
question is part of the NME entity.
However, in that situation, because no
review of the NME entity was
conducted, the NME entity’s entries
were not subject to the review and the
rate for the NME entity is not subject to
change as a result of that review
(although the rate for the individual
exporter may change as a function of the
finding that the exporter is part of the
NME entity).
Following initiation of an
antidumping administrative review
when there is no review requested of the
NME entity, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all
exporters not named in the initiation
notice, including those that were
suspended at the NME entity rate.
All requests must be filed
electronically in Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on
Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS
Web site at https://access.trade.gov.5
Further, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request
must be served on the petitioner and
each exporter or producer specified in
the request.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation’’ for requests received by
the last day of December 2017. If the
Department does not receive, by the last
day of December 2017, a request for
3 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
4 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties
should specify that they are requesting a review of
entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to
the extent possible, include the names of such
exporters in their request.
5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57221
review of entries covered by an order,
finding, or suspended investigation
listed in this notice and for the period
identified above, the Department will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping or
countervailing duties on those entries at
a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or
bond for) estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: November 28, 2017.
James Maeder,
Senior Director, performing the duties of
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017–26070 Filed 12–1–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–560–826]
Monosodium Glutamate From
Indonesia: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on
monosodium glutamate (MSG) from
Indonesia. The period of review (POR)
is November 1, 2015 through October
31, 2016. The review covers a single
mandatory respondent, PT Cheil Jedang
Indonesia (CJI). The Department
preliminarily determines that the
respondent has not made sales of
subject merchandise below normal
value (NV). We invite interested parties
to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable December 4, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caitlin Monks or Joseph Traw, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
57222
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Notices
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2670 or (202) 482–6079,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 13, 2017, the Department
initiated this administrative review on
MSG from Indonesia covering one
company, CJI. The events that have
occurred between initiation and these
preliminary results are discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.1
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is monosodium glutamate (MSG),
whether or not blended or in solution
with other products. The product is
currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) at subheading 2922.42.10.00.
Merchandise covered by this order may
also enter under HTSUS subheadings
2922.42.50.00, 2103.90.72.00,
2103.90.74.00, 2103.90.78.00,
2103.90.80.00, and 2103.90.90.91. These
tariff classifications are provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written product
description, available in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, remains
dispositive.2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Export price is
calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. NV is calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and is
1 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, from James
Maeder, Senior Director performing the duties of
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Monosodium Glutamate from Indonesia, 2015–
2016,’’ dated November 27, 2017 (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted
by this Federal Register notice.
2 For a complete description of the Scope of the
Order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content. A list of the topics discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is attached as an Appendix to this
notice.
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we
calculated a zero percent dumping
margin for CJI for the period November
1, 2015, through December 31, 2016.
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to
the parties the calculations performed in
connection with these preliminary
results within five days of the date of
publication of this notice.3 Pursuant to
19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii), the Department
will issue a case brief schedule at a later
date in the proceeding, notifying
interested parties of the deadlines for
submitting case and rebuttal briefs.
When the case brief schedule is issued,
parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.4 Case and
rebuttal briefs should be filed using
ACCESS.5 In order to be properly filed,
ACCESS must successfully receive an
electronically-filed document in its
entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the
established deadline.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via ACCESS, within 30
days after the date of publication of this
notice.6 Requests should contain: (1)
The party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing
will be limited to those raised in the
respective case briefs.
Unless extended, the Department
intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the
3 See
19 CFR 351.224(b).
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
5 See 19 CFR 351.303.
6 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
4 See
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
results of its analysis of the issues raised
in any written briefs, not later than 120
days after the date of publication of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department will determine, and
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries in accordance with
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If CJI’s weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent)
in the final results of this review, we
will calculate importer-specific
assessment rates based on the ratio of
the total amount of dumping calculated
for the importer’s examined sales and
the total entered value of the sales in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review when the
importer-specific assessment rate
calculated in the final results of this
review is above de minimis. Where the
respondent’s weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis, or an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
The final results of this review shall be
the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by the final results
of this review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by the
respondent for which it did not know
that its merchandise was destined for
the United States, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. We intend to issue
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided for
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for the company
under review will be the rate
established in the final results of this
review, except, if the rate is zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), no
cash deposit will be required; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Notices
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the less-than-fair-value
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters is 6.19 percent, the all-others
rate established in the investigation.7
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 27, 2017.
Carole Showers,
Executive Director, Office of Policy
performing the duties of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Comparisons to Normal Value
V. Product Comparisons
VI. Date of Sale
VII. Constructed Export Price
VIII. Normal Value
IX. Currency Conversion
X. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–26063 Filed 12–1–17; 8:45 am]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
7 See Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic
of Indonesia: Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value 79 FR 58329 (September 29, 2014).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; West Coast Region
Gear Identification Requirements
National Ocean and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before February 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at pracomments@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Keeley Kent, (206) 526–4655
or keeley.kent@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
This request is for extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
The success of fisheries management
programs depends significantly on
regulatory compliance. The
requirements that fishing gear be
marked are essential to facilitate
enforcement. The ability to link fishing
gear to the vessel owner or operator is
crucial to enforcement of regulations
issued under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act. The
marking of fishing gear is also valuable
in actions concerning damage, loss, and
civil proceedings. The regulations
specify that fishing gear must be marked
with the vessel’s official number,
Federal permit or tag number, or some
other specified form of identification.
The regulations further specify how the
gear is to be marked (e.g., location and
color). Law enforcement personnel rely
on gear marking information to assure
compliance with fisheries management
regulations. Gear that is not properly
identified is confiscated. Gear violations
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57223
are more readily prosecuted when the
gear is marked, and this allows for more
cost-effective enforcement. Gear
marking helps ensure that a vessel
harvests fish only from its own traps/
pots/other gear are not illegally placed.
Cooperating fishermen also use the gear
marking numbers to report suspicious or
non-compliant activities that they
observe, and to report placement or
occurrence of gear in unauthorized
areas. The identifying number on
fishing gear is used by the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the
United States Coast Guard (USCG), and
other marine agencies in issuing
regulations, prosecutions, and other
enforcement actions necessary to
support sustainable fisheries behaviors
as intended in regulations. Regulationcompliant fishermen ultimately benefit
from these requirements, as
unauthorized and illegal fishing is
deterred and more burdensome
regulations are avoided.
II. Method of Collection
The physical marking of fishing buoys
is done by fishermen in the Pacific
Coast Groundfish Fishery) according to
regulation.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0648–0352.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,125.
Estimated Time per Response: 15
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 574 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $11,351.60 for materials.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost and whether
the information shall have practical
utility) of the proposed collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 231 (Monday, December 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57221-57223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26063]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-560-826]
Monosodium Glutamate From Indonesia: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on monosodium
glutamate (MSG) from Indonesia. The period of review (POR) is November
1, 2015 through October 31, 2016. The review covers a single mandatory
respondent, PT Cheil Jedang Indonesia (CJI). The Department
preliminarily determines that the respondent has not made sales of
subject merchandise below normal value (NV). We invite interested
parties to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable December 4, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caitlin Monks or Joseph Traw, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
[[Page 57222]]
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2670 or (202) 482-6079,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 13, 2017, the Department initiated this administrative
review on MSG from Indonesia covering one company, CJI. The events that
have occurred between initiation and these preliminary results are
discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from James
Maeder, Senior Director performing the duties of Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Monosodium Glutamate from Indonesia, 2015-
2016,'' dated November 27, 2017 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
which is hereby adopted by this Federal Register notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is monosodium glutamate
(MSG), whether or not blended or in solution with other products. The
product is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) at subheading 2922.42.10.00. Merchandise
covered by this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings
2922.42.50.00, 2103.90.72.00, 2103.90.74.00, 2103.90.78.00,
2103.90.80.00, and 2103.90.90.91. These tariff classifications are
provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written
product description, available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
remains dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price
is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is
calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the
topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as
an Appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we calculated a zero percent dumping
margin for CJI for the period November 1, 2015, through December 31,
2016.
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to the parties the calculations
performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days
of the date of publication of this notice.\3\ Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c)(ii), the Department will issue a case brief schedule at a
later date in the proceeding, notifying interested parties of the
deadlines for submitting case and rebuttal briefs. When the case brief
schedule is issued, parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs
in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.\4\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using
ACCESS.\5\ In order to be properly filed, ACCESS must successfully
receive an electronically-filed document in its entirety by 5 p.m.
Eastern Time on the established deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS, within 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.\6\ Requests should contain: (1) The
party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised
in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case
briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless extended, the Department intends to issue the final results
of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after
the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine,
and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). If CJI's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this
review, we will calculate importer-specific assessment rates based on
the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's
examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the
importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of
this review is above de minimis. Where the respondent's weighted-
average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment
of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final
results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties,
where applicable.
For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by the
respondent for which it did not know that its merchandise was destined
for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final
results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the company
under review will be the rate established in the final results of this
review, except, if the rate is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent), no cash deposit will be required; (2) for previously reviewed
or investigated
[[Page 57223]]
companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or
the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the manufacturer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent
period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters is 6.19 percent,
the all-others rate established in the investigation.\7\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic of Indonesia:
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value 79 FR 58329
(September 29, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 27, 2017.
Carole Showers,
Executive Director, Office of Policy performing the duties of the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Comparisons to Normal Value
V. Product Comparisons
VI. Date of Sale
VII. Constructed Export Price
VIII. Normal Value
IX. Currency Conversion
X. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017-26063 Filed 12-1-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
