Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Clarifying How the Options Regulatory Fee is Assessed and Collected, 57313-57316 [2017-25987]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Notices
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of OCC and on OCC’s Web site at
https://www.theocc.com/about/
publications/bylaws.jsp.
All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not
redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer
to File Number SR–OCC–2017–022 and
should be submitted on or before
December 26, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
Authority.39
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–25989 Filed 12–1–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82164; File No. SR–CBOE–
2017–074]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Clarifying How the
Options Regulatory Fee is Assessed
and Collected
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
November 28, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
17, 2017, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
39 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fees Schedule relating to the Options
Regulator Fee (‘‘ORF’’).
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s Web
site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fees Schedule to clarify how the ORF is
assessed and collected.3
Background
The ORF was established in October
2008 as a replacement of Registered
Representative fees.4 The ORF is
assessed by the Exchange to each
Trading Permit Holder for options
transactions executed or cleared by the
Trading Permit Holder that are cleared
by The Options Clearing Corporation
(‘‘OCC’’) in the customer range (i.e.,
transactions that clear in a customer
account at OCC) regardless of the
exchange on which the transaction
occurs.5
The ORF is designed to recover a
material portion of the costs to the
Exchange of the supervision and
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed rule
changes on November 16, 2017 (SR–CBOE–2017–
073). On November 17, 2017 the Exchange
withdrew SR–CBOE–2017–073 and then
subsequently submitted this filing (SR–CBOE–
2017–074).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58817
(October 20, 2008), 73 FR 63744 (October 27, 2008)
(the ‘‘Original ORF Filing’’).
5 The ORF also applies to customer-range
transactions executed during Extended Trading
Hours as defined in Cboe Options Rule 1.1(rrr).
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57313
regulation of Trading Permit Holder
(‘‘TPH’’) customer options business,
including performing routine
surveillances, investigations,
examinations, financial monitoring, as
well as policy, rulemaking, interpretive
and enforcement activities.6 The
Exchange believes that revenue
generated from the ORF, when
combined with all of the Exchange’s
other regulatory fees and fines, will
cover a material portion, but not all, of
the Exchange’s regulatory costs.
The Exchange monitors the amount of
revenue collected from the ORF to
ensure that it, in combination with its
other regulatory fees and fines, does not
exceed the Exchange’s total regulatory
costs. The Exchange monitors its
regulatory costs and revenues at a
minimum on a semi-annual basis. If the
Exchange determines regulatory
revenues exceed or are insufficient to
cover a material portion of its regulatory
costs, the Exchange will adjust the ORF
by submitting a fee change filing to the
Commission. The Exchange notifies
TPHs of adjustments to the ORF via
regulatory circular. The Exchange
endeavors to provide TPHs with such
notice at least 30 calendar days prior to
the effective date of the change.
Under the Exchange’s current process,
the ORF is assessed to TPHs and
collected indirectly from TPHs through
their clearing firms by OCC on behalf of
the Exchange. The following scenarios
reflect how the ORF is currently
assessed and collected (these apply
regardless if the transaction is executed
on the Exchange or on an away
exchange):
1. If a TPH is the executing clearing
firm on a transaction (‘‘Executing
Clearing Firm’’), the ORF is assessed to
and collected from that TPH by OCC on
behalf of the Exchange.
2. If a TPH is the Executing Clearing
Firm and the transaction is ‘‘given up’’
to a different TPH that clears the
transaction (‘‘Clearing Give-up’’), the
ORF is assessed to the Executing
Clearing Firm (the ORF is the obligation
of the Executing Clearing Firm). The
ORF is collected from the Clearing Giveup.
3. If the Executing Clearing Firm is a
non-TPH and the Clearing Give-up is a
TPH, the ORF is assessed to and
collected from the Clearing Give-up.
6 The Exchange notes that its regulatory
responsibilities with respect to TPH compliance
with options sales practice rules have largely been
allocated to FINRA under a 17d–2 agreement. The
ORF is not designed to cover the cost of that options
sales practice regulation. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 76309 (October 29, 2015), 80 FR
68361 (November 4, 2015).
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
57314
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Notices
4. If a TPH is the Executing Clearing
Firm and a non-TPH is the Clearing
Give-up, the ORF is assessed to the
Executing Clearing Firm. The ORF is the
obligation of the Executing Clearing
Firm but is collected from the non-TPH
Clearing Give-up (for the reasons
described below).
5. No ORF is assessed if a TPH is
neither the Executing Clearing Firm nor
the Clearing Give-up.
The Exchange uses an OCC cleared
trades file to determine the Executing
Clearing Firm and the Clearing Giveup.7
In each of scenarios 1 through 4
above, if the transaction is transferred
pursuant to a Clearing Member Trade
Assignment (‘‘CMTA’’) arrangement to
another clearing firm who ultimately
clears the transaction, the ORF is
collected from the clearing firm that
ultimately clears the transaction (which
firm may be a non-TPH) by OCC on
behalf of the Exchange. Using CMTA
transfer information provided by the
OCC, the Exchange subtracts the ORF
charge from the monthly ORF bill of the
clearing firm that transfers the position
and adds the charge to the monthly ORF
bill of the clearing firm that receives the
CMTA transfer (i.e., the ultimate
clearing firm).8 This process is
performed at the end of each month on
each transfer in the OCC CMTA transfer
file for that month.9
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Amendments to the Fees
Schedule
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fees Schedule in the following four
respects to clarify how the ORF is
assessed and collected.
First, the Exchange proposes to
amend its Fees Schedule to clarify that
the ORF is collected by OCC on behalf
of the Exchange from the Clearing
Trading Permit Holder (‘‘CTPH’’) or
non-CTPH that ultimately clears the
transaction. While the ORF is an
obligation of TPHs, due to industry
7 The Exchange notes that in the case where a
non-self-clearing TPH executes a transaction on the
Exchange, the TPH’s guaranteeing Clearing Trading
Permit Holder is reflected as the Executing Clearing
Firm in the OCC cleared trades file and the ORF is
assessed to and collected from the Executing
Clearing Firm.
8 See Cboe Options Regulatory Circular RG09–030
(‘‘ORF FAQ’’), Question 15.
9 The Exchange notes that OCC provides the
Exchange and other exchanges with information to
assist in excluding CMTA transfers done to correct
bona fide errors from the ORF calculation.
Specifically, if a clearing firm gives up or CMTA
transfers a position to the wrong clearing firm, the
firm that caused the error will send an offsetting
CMTA transfer to that firm and send a new CMTA
transfer to the correct firm. The offsetting CMTA
transfer is marked with a CMTA Transfer ORF
Indicator which results in the original erroneous
transfer being excluded from the ORF calculation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
request the ORF is collected from the
clearing firm that ultimately clears the
eligible trade, even if such firm is a not
a TPH. The Exchange, OCC and the
industry agreed to this collection
method in response to comments that by
collecting the ORF in this manner TPHs
and non-TPHs could more easily passthrough the ORF to their customers.10 In
the Original ORF Filing, the Exchange
stated that it expects TPHs will passthrough the ORF to their customers in
the same manner that firms passthrough to their customers the fees
charged by self-regulatory organizations
(‘‘SROs’’) to help the SROs meet their
obligations under Section 31 of the
Exchange Act.11
Accordingly, in scenario 4 above the
ORF is collected from the non-CTPH
that clears the transaction in order to
facilitate the pass-through of the ORF to
the end-customer. Likewise, collection
of the ORF from the ultimate (CMTA)
clearing firm facilitates the passing of
the fee to the end-customer. In those
cases where the ORF is collected from
a non-CTPH, the Exchange (through
OCC) collects the ORF as a convenience
for the TPH whose obligation it is to pay
the fee to the Exchange.
As described above, under the
Exchange’s current process the
Exchange subtracts the ORF from a
CMTA transferor’s ORF bill and adds it
to the CMTA transferee’s ORF bill for
every transfer in the monthly OCC
CMTA transfer file. Going forward, in
order to avoid potentially collecting the
ORF on any transactions that are not
subject to the ORF, the Exchange will
perform a check to determine whether
the CMTA transferor or transferee is a
TPH. If either the CMTA transferor or
transferee is a TPH, the Exchange will
collect the ORF from the transferee
through the process described above. If
neither the transferor nor transferee is a
TPH, the Exchange will not include that
transfer as part of such process (i.e., the
Exchange will not debit the ORF from
the transferor or collect the ORF from
the transferee). The consequence of this
change is that there may be a very small
number of instances each month in
which a position that was assessed the
ORF would not be passed to the
ultimate clearing firm and the charge
would remain with (and be collected
from) the original clearing firm. The
Exchange expects to implement this
change for December 2017 ORF billing
after a necessary system enhancement
has been completed.
Second, the Exchange proposes to
amend its Fees Schedule to clarify that
10 See
11 See
PO 00000
ORF FAQ, Question 9.
ORF FAQ, Question 10.
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the ORF is assessed by the Exchange to
each TPH for options transactions
cleared by the TPH (as opposed to
‘‘executed or cleared’’ by the TPH) that
are cleared by OCC in the customer
range regardless of the exchange on
which the transaction occurs. As
described above, whether a transaction
is subject to the ORF is determined by
whether a TPH is the Executing Clearing
Firm or the Clearing Give-up as
reflected in the OCC cleared trades file.
Only the Executing Clearing Firm and
the Clearing Give-up on the transaction
are identified on the OCC file.
Accordingly, because the ORF is always
assessed to a CTPH, the Exchange
proposes to remove the words
‘‘executed or’’ from the Fee Schedule
description of the ORF to clarify that the
ORF is assessed for options transactions
cleared by a TPH.
Third, the Exchange proposes to
clarify its process for assessing the ORF
on linkage transactions. An options
order entered on the Exchange may be
routed to and executed on another
exchange pursuant to the Options Order
Protection and Locked/Crossed Market
Plan. The Exchange may engage a
routing broker to provide routing
services to the Exchange as described in
Cboe Options Rule 6.14B (‘‘Routing
Services’’) to facilitate linkage
transactions. A customer order routed
by a routing broker for execution at
another exchange results in a
transaction on that exchange and an
obligation of the routing broker to pay
the options regulatory fee, if any, of that
exchange. After receiving a fill on the
away exchange, the routing broker
trades against the original order entered
on the Exchange and incurs the Cboe
Options ORF. Pursuant to its agreement
with the routing broker, the Exchange
reimburses the routing broker for any
options regulatory fee assessed by the
Exchange and by the away market on
which the customer order was executed.
As a result, only the original customer
order executed on the Exchange is
assessed the ORF. The Exchange
proposes to amend its Fees Schedule to
clarify that, with respect to linkage
transactions, the Exchange reimburses
its routing broker providing Routing
Services pursuant to Cboe Options Rule
6.14B for options regulatory fees it
incurs in connection with the Routing
Services it provides.
Fourth, the Exchange proposes to
change the method it uses to assess the
ORF to better align with the Exchange’s
Fees Schedule. Currently, the Exchange
assesses the ORF to a TPH based on the
OCC clearing number(s) that the TPH
registers with the Exchange. A TPH may
have additional OCC clearing numbers
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Notices
that are not registered with the
Exchange because they are used by the
TPH to clear activity on other
exchanges. If a TPH uses a non-CBOE
Options registered OCC clearing number
on a transaction and that clearing
number is denoted as the Executing
Clearing Firm or the Clearing Give-up,
the ORF is not assessed to that
transaction because the clearing number
is not known to the Exchange. Such
transactions are subject to the ORF
under the Exchange’s Fees Schedule
because the Executing Clearing Firm or
the Clearing Give-up was a TPH. The
ORF is assessed at the TPH entity level,
not at the OCC clearing number level.
In order to conform its ORF billing
practice to its Fees Schedule, the
Exchange proposes to amend the Fees
Schedule to require TPHs, pursuant to
Cboe Options Rule 15.1,12 to provide the
Exchange with a complete list of its
OCC clearing numbers. The Exchange
would use the list provided solely for
ORF billing purposes. TPHs would be
required to keep such information up to
date with the Exchange. The Exchange
will issue a Regulatory Circular to
provide TPHs with notice of this change
and a deadline for initial submission of
its OCC clearing numbers list. The
Exchange expects to implement this
change for December 2017 ORF billing
in order for the Exchange to provide
TPHs with notice of this new
requirement and time to comply.13
The Exchange also proposes a couple
of minor clean up changes to the Fees
Schedule. The ORF is listed as being
$0.0064 per contract through January
31, 2016 and $0.0081 per contract
effective February 1, 2016. As these
dates have passed and the ORF is now
simply $0.0081 per contract, the
Exchange proposes to delete the
reference to the ORF being $0.0064 per
contract through January 31, 2016 and
the February 1, 2016 effective date of
the $0.0081 per contract ORF.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
12 Cboe Options Rule 15.1 provides that no
Trading Permit Holder shall refuse to make
available to the Exchange such books, records or
other information as may be called for under the
Rules or as may be requested in connection with an
investigation by the Exchange.
13 The Exchange notes that its Fees Schedule
includes other requirements for TPHs to provide
certain information to the Exchange related to
Exchange fees. For example, footnote 13 of the Fees
Schedule requires TPHs to submit a rebate request
form with supporting documentation in order to
receive a rebate of transaction fees for certain
options transactions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.14 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act,15 which provides that
Exchange rules may provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its
Trading Permit Holders and other
persons using its facilities. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 16 requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit
unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes the proposal to
collect the ORF from non-TPHs that
ultimately clear the transaction is an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its
Trading Permit Holders and other
persons using its facilities. The
Exchange notes that there is a material
distinction between ‘‘assessing’’ the
ORF and ‘‘collecting’’ the ORF. The
Exchange does not assess the ORF to
non-TPHs. The ORF is an obligation of
TPHs. Once, however, the ORF is
assessed to a TPH for a particular
transaction, the ORF may be collected
from a TPH or a non-TPH, depending on
how the transaction is cleared at OCC.
If there was no change to the clearing
number of the original transaction, the
ORF would be collected from the TPH.
If there was a change to the clearing
number of the original transaction and
a non-TPH becomes the ultimate
clearing firm for that transaction, then
the ORF will be collected from that nonTPH. The Exchange believes that this
collection practice is reasonable and
appropriate, and was originally
instituted at the request of the industry
for the ORF be collected from the
clearing firm that ultimately clears the
transaction in order to facilitate the
passing of the fee to the end-customer.
The Exchange believes it is
reasonable, equitable and
nondiscriminatory not to pass the ORF
to a CMTA transferee when neither the
CMTA transferor nor the transferee is a
TPH because this would help ensure the
ORF is not collected on any transactions
that may not be subject to the ORF.
The Exchange believes the proposal to
clarify that the ORF is assessed to TPHs
for options transactions cleared by the
TPH (as opposed to executed or cleared)
is reasonable because it adds clarity to
the Fees Schedule by better and more
accurately describing the application of
14 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
15 15
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57315
the ORF. The Exchange believes it is
appropriate to charge the ORF only to
transactions that clear as customer at the
OCC. The Exchange believes that its
broad regulatory responsibilities with
respect to its TPH’s activities supports
applying the ORF to transactions
cleared by a TPH. The Exchange’s
regulatory responsibilities are the same
regardless of whether a TPH executes a
transaction or clears a transaction
executed on its behalf. The Exchange
regularly reviews all such activity,
including performing surveillance for
position limit violations, manipulation,
insider trading, front-running and
contrary exercise advice violations. The
Exchange believes the proposal is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it would apply
in the same manner to TPHs subject to
the ORF. The ORF is only assessed to
a TPH with respect to a particular
transaction in which it is either the
Executing Clearing Firm or the Clearing
Give-up.
The Exchange believes it is
reasonable, equitable and
nondiscriminatory to reimburse its
routing broker for any options
regulatory fees the broker incurs in
connection with Routing Services
because this helps ensure the Exchange
does not charge the ORF more than once
to a single customer order.
The Exchange believes the proposal to
require TPHs to provide the Exchange
with a complete list of its OCC clearing
numbers is reasonable because it would
enable the Exchange to conform its ORF
billing practice to its Fees Schedule by
capturing transactions executed or
cleared by TPHs. The Exchange believes
the proposal is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it
would apply in the same manner to
TPHs subject to the ORF.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not intended to
address any competitive issues but
rather to provide more clarity and
transparency regarding how the
Exchange assesses and collects the ORF.
The Exchange believes any burden on
competition imposed by the proposed
rule change is outweighed by the need
to help the Exchange adequately fund
its regulatory activities to ensure
compliance with the Exchange Act.
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
57316
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 17 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 18 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–
CBOE–2017–074 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–CBOE–2017–074. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
17 15
18 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Dec 01, 2017
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying
information from comment
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–CBOE–
2017–074, and should be submitted on
or before December 26, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–25987 Filed 12–1–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–86; OMB Control No.
3235–0080]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–2736
Extension:
Rule 12d2–2 and Form 25.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit these existing
collections of information to the Office
of Management and Budget for
extension and approval for Rule 12d2–
2 (17 CFR 240.12d2–2) and Form 25 (17
CFR 249.25) Removal and Notification
of Removal from Listing and/or
Registration.
19 17
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On February 12, 1935, the
Commission adopted Rule 12d2–2,1 and
Form 25 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78b et seq.)
(‘‘Act’’), to establish the conditions and
procedures under which a security may
be delisted from an exchange and
withdrawn from registration under
Section 12(b) of the Act.2 The
Commission adopted amendments to
Rule 12d2–2 and Form 25 in 2005.3
Under the amended Rule 12d2–2, all
issuers and national securities
exchanges seeking to delist and
deregister a security in accordance with
the rules of an exchange must file the
adopted version of Form 25 with the
Commission. The Commission also
adopted amendments to Rule 19d–1
under the Act to require exchanges to
file the adopted version of Form 25 as
notice to the Commission under Section
19(d) of the Act. Finally, the
Commission adopted amendments to
exempt standardized options and
security futures products from Section
12(d) of the Act. These amendments are
intended to simplify the paperwork and
procedure associated with a delisting
and to unify general rules and
procedures relating to the delisting
process.
The Form 25 is useful because it
informs the Commission that a security
previously traded on an exchange is no
longer traded. In addition, the Form 25
enables the Commission to verify that
the delisting and/or deregistration has
occurred in accordance with the rules of
the exchange. Further, the Form 25
helps to focus the attention of delisting
issuers to make sure that they abide by
the proper procedural and notice
requirements associated with a delisting
and/or a deregistration. Without Rule
12d2–2 and the Form 25, as applicable,
the Commission would be unable to
fulfill its statutory responsibilities.
There are 21 national securities
exchanges that could possibly be
respondents complying with the
requirements of the Rule and Form 25.4
1 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98
(February 12, 1935).
2 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 7011
(February 5, 1963), 28 FR 1506 (February 16, 1963).
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52029
(July 14, 2005), 70 FR 42456 (July 22, 2005).
4 The staff notes that a few of these 21 registered
national securities exchanges only have rules to
permit the listing of standardized options, which
are exempt from Rule 12d2–2 under the Act.
Nevertheless, the staff counted national securities
exchanges that can only list options as potential
respondents because these exchanges could
potentially adopt new rules, subject to Commission
approval under Section 19(b) of the Act, to list and
trade equity and other securities that have to
comply with Rule 12d2–2 under the Act. Notice
registrants that are registered as national securities
exchanges solely for the purposes of trading
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 231 (Monday, December 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57313-57316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25987]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82164; File No. SR-CBOE-2017-074]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Clarifying
How the Options Regulatory Fee is Assessed and Collected
November 28, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 17, 2017, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule relating to the
Options Regulator Fee (``ORF'').
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule to clarify how the
ORF is assessed and collected.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed rule changes on
November 16, 2017 (SR-CBOE-2017-073). On November 17, 2017 the
Exchange withdrew SR-CBOE-2017-073 and then subsequently submitted
this filing (SR-CBOE-2017-074).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The ORF was established in October 2008 as a replacement of
Registered Representative fees.\4\ The ORF is assessed by the Exchange
to each Trading Permit Holder for options transactions executed or
cleared by the Trading Permit Holder that are cleared by The Options
Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') in the customer range (i.e.,
transactions that clear in a customer account at OCC) regardless of the
exchange on which the transaction occurs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58817 (October 20,
2008), 73 FR 63744 (October 27, 2008) (the ``Original ORF Filing'').
\5\ The ORF also applies to customer-range transactions executed
during Extended Trading Hours as defined in Cboe Options Rule
1.1(rrr).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs to
the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of Trading Permit Holder
(``TPH'') customer options business, including performing routine
surveillances, investigations, examinations, financial monitoring, as
well as policy, rulemaking, interpretive and enforcement activities.\6\
The Exchange believes that revenue generated from the ORF, when
combined with all of the Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines,
will cover a material portion, but not all, of the Exchange's
regulatory costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange notes that its regulatory responsibilities with
respect to TPH compliance with options sales practice rules have
largely been allocated to FINRA under a 17d-2 agreement. The ORF is
not designed to cover the cost of that options sales practice
regulation. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76309 (October
29, 2015), 80 FR 68361 (November 4, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the ORF
to ensure that it, in combination with its other regulatory fees and
fines, does not exceed the Exchange's total regulatory costs. The
Exchange monitors its regulatory costs and revenues at a minimum on a
semi-annual basis. If the Exchange determines regulatory revenues
exceed or are insufficient to cover a material portion of its
regulatory costs, the Exchange will adjust the ORF by submitting a fee
change filing to the Commission. The Exchange notifies TPHs of
adjustments to the ORF via regulatory circular. The Exchange endeavors
to provide TPHs with such notice at least 30 calendar days prior to the
effective date of the change.
Under the Exchange's current process, the ORF is assessed to TPHs
and collected indirectly from TPHs through their clearing firms by OCC
on behalf of the Exchange. The following scenarios reflect how the ORF
is currently assessed and collected (these apply regardless if the
transaction is executed on the Exchange or on an away exchange):
1. If a TPH is the executing clearing firm on a transaction
(``Executing Clearing Firm''), the ORF is assessed to and collected
from that TPH by OCC on behalf of the Exchange.
2. If a TPH is the Executing Clearing Firm and the transaction is
``given up'' to a different TPH that clears the transaction (``Clearing
Give-up''), the ORF is assessed to the Executing Clearing Firm (the ORF
is the obligation of the Executing Clearing Firm). The ORF is collected
from the Clearing Give-up.
3. If the Executing Clearing Firm is a non-TPH and the Clearing
Give-up is a TPH, the ORF is assessed to and collected from the
Clearing Give-up.
[[Page 57314]]
4. If a TPH is the Executing Clearing Firm and a non-TPH is the
Clearing Give-up, the ORF is assessed to the Executing Clearing Firm.
The ORF is the obligation of the Executing Clearing Firm but is
collected from the non-TPH Clearing Give-up (for the reasons described
below).
5. No ORF is assessed if a TPH is neither the Executing Clearing
Firm nor the Clearing Give-up.
The Exchange uses an OCC cleared trades file to determine the
Executing Clearing Firm and the Clearing Give-up.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Exchange notes that in the case where a non-self-
clearing TPH executes a transaction on the Exchange, the TPH's
guaranteeing Clearing Trading Permit Holder is reflected as the
Executing Clearing Firm in the OCC cleared trades file and the ORF
is assessed to and collected from the Executing Clearing Firm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In each of scenarios 1 through 4 above, if the transaction is
transferred pursuant to a Clearing Member Trade Assignment (``CMTA'')
arrangement to another clearing firm who ultimately clears the
transaction, the ORF is collected from the clearing firm that
ultimately clears the transaction (which firm may be a non-TPH) by OCC
on behalf of the Exchange. Using CMTA transfer information provided by
the OCC, the Exchange subtracts the ORF charge from the monthly ORF
bill of the clearing firm that transfers the position and adds the
charge to the monthly ORF bill of the clearing firm that receives the
CMTA transfer (i.e., the ultimate clearing firm).\8\ This process is
performed at the end of each month on each transfer in the OCC CMTA
transfer file for that month.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Cboe Options Regulatory Circular RG09-030 (``ORF FAQ''),
Question 15.
\9\ The Exchange notes that OCC provides the Exchange and other
exchanges with information to assist in excluding CMTA transfers
done to correct bona fide errors from the ORF calculation.
Specifically, if a clearing firm gives up or CMTA transfers a
position to the wrong clearing firm, the firm that caused the error
will send an offsetting CMTA transfer to that firm and send a new
CMTA transfer to the correct firm. The offsetting CMTA transfer is
marked with a CMTA Transfer ORF Indicator which results in the
original erroneous transfer being excluded from the ORF calculation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Amendments to the Fees Schedule
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule in the following
four respects to clarify how the ORF is assessed and collected.
First, the Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule to clarify
that the ORF is collected by OCC on behalf of the Exchange from the
Clearing Trading Permit Holder (``CTPH'') or non-CTPH that ultimately
clears the transaction. While the ORF is an obligation of TPHs, due to
industry request the ORF is collected from the clearing firm that
ultimately clears the eligible trade, even if such firm is a not a TPH.
The Exchange, OCC and the industry agreed to this collection method in
response to comments that by collecting the ORF in this manner TPHs and
non-TPHs could more easily pass-through the ORF to their customers.\10\
In the Original ORF Filing, the Exchange stated that it expects TPHs
will pass-through the ORF to their customers in the same manner that
firms pass-through to their customers the fees charged by self-
regulatory organizations (``SROs'') to help the SROs meet their
obligations under Section 31 of the Exchange Act.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See ORF FAQ, Question 9.
\11\ See ORF FAQ, Question 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, in scenario 4 above the ORF is collected from the non-
CTPH that clears the transaction in order to facilitate the pass-
through of the ORF to the end-customer. Likewise, collection of the ORF
from the ultimate (CMTA) clearing firm facilitates the passing of the
fee to the end-customer. In those cases where the ORF is collected from
a non-CTPH, the Exchange (through OCC) collects the ORF as a
convenience for the TPH whose obligation it is to pay the fee to the
Exchange.
As described above, under the Exchange's current process the
Exchange subtracts the ORF from a CMTA transferor's ORF bill and adds
it to the CMTA transferee's ORF bill for every transfer in the monthly
OCC CMTA transfer file. Going forward, in order to avoid potentially
collecting the ORF on any transactions that are not subject to the ORF,
the Exchange will perform a check to determine whether the CMTA
transferor or transferee is a TPH. If either the CMTA transferor or
transferee is a TPH, the Exchange will collect the ORF from the
transferee through the process described above. If neither the
transferor nor transferee is a TPH, the Exchange will not include that
transfer as part of such process (i.e., the Exchange will not debit the
ORF from the transferor or collect the ORF from the transferee). The
consequence of this change is that there may be a very small number of
instances each month in which a position that was assessed the ORF
would not be passed to the ultimate clearing firm and the charge would
remain with (and be collected from) the original clearing firm. The
Exchange expects to implement this change for December 2017 ORF billing
after a necessary system enhancement has been completed.
Second, the Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule to clarify
that the ORF is assessed by the Exchange to each TPH for options
transactions cleared by the TPH (as opposed to ``executed or cleared''
by the TPH) that are cleared by OCC in the customer range regardless of
the exchange on which the transaction occurs. As described above,
whether a transaction is subject to the ORF is determined by whether a
TPH is the Executing Clearing Firm or the Clearing Give-up as reflected
in the OCC cleared trades file. Only the Executing Clearing Firm and
the Clearing Give-up on the transaction are identified on the OCC file.
Accordingly, because the ORF is always assessed to a CTPH, the Exchange
proposes to remove the words ``executed or'' from the Fee Schedule
description of the ORF to clarify that the ORF is assessed for options
transactions cleared by a TPH.
Third, the Exchange proposes to clarify its process for assessing
the ORF on linkage transactions. An options order entered on the
Exchange may be routed to and executed on another exchange pursuant to
the Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan. The
Exchange may engage a routing broker to provide routing services to the
Exchange as described in Cboe Options Rule 6.14B (``Routing Services'')
to facilitate linkage transactions. A customer order routed by a
routing broker for execution at another exchange results in a
transaction on that exchange and an obligation of the routing broker to
pay the options regulatory fee, if any, of that exchange. After
receiving a fill on the away exchange, the routing broker trades
against the original order entered on the Exchange and incurs the Cboe
Options ORF. Pursuant to its agreement with the routing broker, the
Exchange reimburses the routing broker for any options regulatory fee
assessed by the Exchange and by the away market on which the customer
order was executed. As a result, only the original customer order
executed on the Exchange is assessed the ORF. The Exchange proposes to
amend its Fees Schedule to clarify that, with respect to linkage
transactions, the Exchange reimburses its routing broker providing
Routing Services pursuant to Cboe Options Rule 6.14B for options
regulatory fees it incurs in connection with the Routing Services it
provides.
Fourth, the Exchange proposes to change the method it uses to
assess the ORF to better align with the Exchange's Fees Schedule.
Currently, the Exchange assesses the ORF to a TPH based on the OCC
clearing number(s) that the TPH registers with the Exchange. A TPH may
have additional OCC clearing numbers
[[Page 57315]]
that are not registered with the Exchange because they are used by the
TPH to clear activity on other exchanges. If a TPH uses a non-CBOE
Options registered OCC clearing number on a transaction and that
clearing number is denoted as the Executing Clearing Firm or the
Clearing Give-up, the ORF is not assessed to that transaction because
the clearing number is not known to the Exchange. Such transactions are
subject to the ORF under the Exchange's Fees Schedule because the
Executing Clearing Firm or the Clearing Give-up was a TPH. The ORF is
assessed at the TPH entity level, not at the OCC clearing number level.
In order to conform its ORF billing practice to its Fees Schedule,
the Exchange proposes to amend the Fees Schedule to require TPHs,
pursuant to Cboe Options Rule 15.1,\12\ to provide the Exchange with a
complete list of its OCC clearing numbers. The Exchange would use the
list provided solely for ORF billing purposes. TPHs would be required
to keep such information up to date with the Exchange. The Exchange
will issue a Regulatory Circular to provide TPHs with notice of this
change and a deadline for initial submission of its OCC clearing
numbers list. The Exchange expects to implement this change for
December 2017 ORF billing in order for the Exchange to provide TPHs
with notice of this new requirement and time to comply.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Cboe Options Rule 15.1 provides that no Trading Permit
Holder shall refuse to make available to the Exchange such books,
records or other information as may be called for under the Rules or
as may be requested in connection with an investigation by the
Exchange.
\13\ The Exchange notes that its Fees Schedule includes other
requirements for TPHs to provide certain information to the Exchange
related to Exchange fees. For example, footnote 13 of the Fees
Schedule requires TPHs to submit a rebate request form with
supporting documentation in order to receive a rebate of transaction
fees for certain options transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes a couple of minor clean up changes to
the Fees Schedule. The ORF is listed as being $0.0064 per contract
through January 31, 2016 and $0.0081 per contract effective February 1,
2016. As these dates have passed and the ORF is now simply $0.0081 per
contract, the Exchange proposes to delete the reference to the ORF
being $0.0064 per contract through January 31, 2016 and the February 1,
2016 effective date of the $0.0081 per contract ORF.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\14\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\15\ which provides that Exchange rules may provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using its
facilities. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \16\ requirement that the
rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposal to collect the ORF from non-TPHs
that ultimately clear the transaction is an equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its Trading Permit
Holders and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange notes that
there is a material distinction between ``assessing'' the ORF and
``collecting'' the ORF. The Exchange does not assess the ORF to non-
TPHs. The ORF is an obligation of TPHs. Once, however, the ORF is
assessed to a TPH for a particular transaction, the ORF may be
collected from a TPH or a non-TPH, depending on how the transaction is
cleared at OCC. If there was no change to the clearing number of the
original transaction, the ORF would be collected from the TPH. If there
was a change to the clearing number of the original transaction and a
non-TPH becomes the ultimate clearing firm for that transaction, then
the ORF will be collected from that non-TPH. The Exchange believes that
this collection practice is reasonable and appropriate, and was
originally instituted at the request of the industry for the ORF be
collected from the clearing firm that ultimately clears the transaction
in order to facilitate the passing of the fee to the end-customer.
The Exchange believes it is reasonable, equitable and
nondiscriminatory not to pass the ORF to a CMTA transferee when neither
the CMTA transferor nor the transferee is a TPH because this would help
ensure the ORF is not collected on any transactions that may not be
subject to the ORF.
The Exchange believes the proposal to clarify that the ORF is
assessed to TPHs for options transactions cleared by the TPH (as
opposed to executed or cleared) is reasonable because it adds clarity
to the Fees Schedule by better and more accurately describing the
application of the ORF. The Exchange believes it is appropriate to
charge the ORF only to transactions that clear as customer at the OCC.
The Exchange believes that its broad regulatory responsibilities with
respect to its TPH's activities supports applying the ORF to
transactions cleared by a TPH. The Exchange's regulatory
responsibilities are the same regardless of whether a TPH executes a
transaction or clears a transaction executed on its behalf. The
Exchange regularly reviews all such activity, including performing
surveillance for position limit violations, manipulation, insider
trading, front-running and contrary exercise advice violations. The
Exchange believes the proposal is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it would apply in the same manner to TPHs
subject to the ORF. The ORF is only assessed to a TPH with respect to a
particular transaction in which it is either the Executing Clearing
Firm or the Clearing Give-up.
The Exchange believes it is reasonable, equitable and
nondiscriminatory to reimburse its routing broker for any options
regulatory fees the broker incurs in connection with Routing Services
because this helps ensure the Exchange does not charge the ORF more
than once to a single customer order.
The Exchange believes the proposal to require TPHs to provide the
Exchange with a complete list of its OCC clearing numbers is reasonable
because it would enable the Exchange to conform its ORF billing
practice to its Fees Schedule by capturing transactions executed or
cleared by TPHs. The Exchange believes the proposal is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because it would apply in the same manner
to TPHs subject to the ORF.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not intended to address any competitive issues but rather to provide
more clarity and transparency regarding how the Exchange assesses and
collects the ORF. The Exchange believes any burden on competition
imposed by the proposed rule change is outweighed by the need to help
the Exchange adequately fund its regulatory activities to ensure
compliance with the Exchange Act.
[[Page 57316]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \17\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \18\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-CBOE-2017-074 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-2017-074. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal
identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-2017-074, and should be submitted on
or before December 26, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-25987 Filed 12-1-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P