Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 55091-55093 [2017-25085]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2017 / Notices decision of the Court that is not in harmony with the Department’s Final Determination. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirement of Timken. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Amended Final Results Low Melt Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the Less-Than-FairValue Investigations Because there is now a final court decision, the Department amends the Final Determination with respect to the margin assigned to PT and for all other producers and exporters.10 Producer/exporter 11 Producer: Pro-Team Coil Nail Enterprise, Inc ......................... Exporter: Pro-Team Coil Nail Enterprise, Inc. or PT Enterprise Inc.12 ....................................... All-Others .................................... Cash Deposit Requirements International Trade Administration [A–580–895, A–583–861] Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Weighted- Department of Commerce. average DATES: Effective November 20, 2017. dumping FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: margin (%) Alice Maldonado at (202) 482–4682 (Republic of Korea (Korea)) or Rebecca M. Janz at (202) 482–4682 (Taiwan), 2.16 AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade .................. Administration, U.S. Department of 2.16 Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: 55091 state the reasons for the request. The Department will grant the request unless it finds compelling reasons to deny the request. See 19 CFR 351.205(e). On November 7, 2017, the petitioner submitted a timely request that the Department postpone the preliminary determinations in these LTFV investigations.3 The petitioner stated that it requests postponement because the Department is still gathering data and questionnaire responses, and additional time is necessary for the Department and interested parties to review and analyze all questionnaire responses, as well as for interested parties to comment on these responses.4 For the reasons stated above and because there are no compelling reasons to deny the request, the Department, in accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing the deadline for the preliminary determinations by 50 days (i.e., 190 days after the date on which these investigations were initiated). As a result, the Department will issue its preliminary determinations no later than January 23, 2018. In accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final determinations of these investigations will continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary determinations, unless postponed at a later date. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Since the Final Determination, the Department has not established a new cash deposit rate for PT or all other producers and exporters. As a result, in accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect cash deposits at the rates for entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the rates for exporters and producers listed above in this notice, effective October 14, 2017. Background Notification to Interested Parties Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the Department to issue the preliminary determination in an LTFV investigation within 140 days after the date on which the Department initiated the investigation. However, section 733(c)(1) of the Act permits the Department to postpone the preliminary determination until no later than 190 days after the date on which the Department initiated the investigation if: (A) the petitioner 2 makes a timely request for a postponement; or (B) the Department concludes that the parties concerned are cooperating, that the investigation is extraordinarily complicated, and that additional time is necessary to make a preliminary determination. Under 19 CFR 351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a request for postponement 25 days or more before the scheduled date of the preliminary determination and must Dated: November 14, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 1 See Low Melt Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Initiation of LessThan-Fair-Value Investigations, 82 FR 34277 (July 24, 2017). 2 The petitioner is Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America. 3 See the Petitioner’s Letter re: Low Melt Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan—Petitioners’ Request to Postpone the Antidumping Duty Preliminary Determinations, dated November 7, 2017. 4 Id. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516(A)(e), 735(c)(1)(B), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: November 13, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017–25086 Filed 11–17–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES 10 See Final Determination, 80 FR at 28961; see also Remand Results at 23–24. Note that entries of merchandise produced by Ko Nails, Inc. and exported by Quick Advance Inc. are excluded from the order. See Order at 39997. 11 In the Final Determination and the Order, the Department only listed PT Enterprise Inc., an exporter, and did not include its affiliated producer, Pro-Team Coil Nail Enterprise, Inc., in the chart reflecting final weighted-average dumping margins. For clarity and for purposes of issuing our cash deposit instructions to CBP, we now include reference to Pro-Team Coil Nail Enterprise, Inc. in this amended final determination. 12 We incorrectly referred to PT Enterprise Inc. as PT Enterprises in the Final Determination and the Order. See Final Determination, at 28961; see also Order, at 39996. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:15 Nov 17, 2017 Jkt 244001 On July 17, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigations of imports of low melt polyester staple fiber (low melt PSF) from Korea and Taiwan.1 Currently, the preliminary determinations are due no later than December 4, 2017. Postponement of Preliminary Determinations PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2017–25084 Filed 11–17–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–964] Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015– 2016 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM 20NON1 55092 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2017 / Notices On August 8, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on seamless refined copper pipe and tube from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the period of review (POR), November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016. For the final results of this review, the Department continues to determine that the five remaining companies under review failed to establish their eligibility for a separate rate for the POR, and thus, are part of the PRC-wide entity. The final dumping margin of sales at the PRC-Wide Entity rate is listed below in the ‘‘Final Results’’ section of this notice. DATES: Applicable November 20, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Hancock or Courtney Canales, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1394 or (202) 482–4997, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background On August 8, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Results of the antidumping duty order on seamless refined copper pipe and tube from the PRC.1 We invited parties to submit comments on the Preliminary Results, but we received no comments. The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is seamless refined copper pipe and tube. The product is currently classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 7411.10.1030 and 7411.10.1090. Products subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS item numbers 7407.10.1500, 7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and 8415.90.8085. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order remains dispositive.2 1 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 37058 (August 8, 2017) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (Preliminary Decision Memorandum) (collectively, Preliminary Results). 2 For a full description of the scope of the Order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:15 Nov 17, 2017 Jkt 244001 Analysis of Comments Received As noted above, we received no comments on the Preliminary Results. Changes Since the Preliminary Results As no parties submitted comments on the Preliminary Results, the Department has not modified its analysis from that presented in the Preliminary Results, and no decision memorandum accompanies this Federal Register notice. Further, the Department has made no adjustments to the determination that China Hailiang Metal Trading (China Hailiang), Shanghai Hailiang Metal Trading Limited (Shanghai Hailiang Trading), Hong Kong Hailiang, Shanghai Hailiang, and Zhejiang Hailiang did not demonstrate that they are entitled to a separate rate. Accordingly, we continue to determine it appropriate to consider all five companies to be part of the PRC-Wide entity.3 The rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity is 60.85 percent.4 Final Results The final weighted-average dumping margin is as follows: Exporter/producer Weightedaverage dumping margin (%) PRC-Wide Entity 5 ................ 60.85 Assessment Rates We have not calculated any assessment (or cash deposit) rates in this administrative review, because the five companies under review are a part of 3 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 4–5. Pursuant to the Department’s change in practice, the Department no longer considers the non-market economy (NME) entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). Under this practice, the NME entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department selfinitiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the entity, the entity is not under review and the entity’s rate is not subject to change. 4 The rate for the PRC-Wide Entity was first assigned in the less than fair value investigation of seamless refined copper pipe and tube from the PRC, see Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 75 FR 60725, 60729 (October 1, 2010). This rate has been used in each subsequent administrative review in which there was a party being considered as part of the PRC-Wide Entity. 5 The PRC-wide entity includes China Hailiang, Shanghai Hailiang Trading, Hong Kong Hailiang, Shanghai Hailiang, and Zhejiang Hailiang. PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the PRC-wide entity. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-Wide rate (i.e., 60.85 percent); and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with the final results within five days of its public announcement, or if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because the Department determined that China Hailiang, Shanghai Hailiang Trading, Hong Kong Hailiang, Shanghai Hailiang, and Zhejiang Hailiang are part of the PRCwide entity, and have been assigned the PRC-wide rate, there are no calculations to disclose. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM 20NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2017 / Notices Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). Dated: November 13, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017–25085 Filed 11–17–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–583–008] Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015– 2016 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 18, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2015 through April 30, 2016. This review covers Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang) and Yieh Hsing Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Hsing). Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin calculations. The final weighted-average dumping margins for the reviewed firms are listed below in the section entitled, ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ DATES: Applicable November 20, 2017. nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:15 Nov 17, 2017 Jkt 244001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hoefke, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4947. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 18, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this review in the Federal Register.1 We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On June 19, 2017, we received a case brief from Wheatland Tube Group (the petitioner).2 On June 26, 2017, we received a rebuttal brief from Shin Yang.3 The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The product is currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, and 7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive.4 Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily determined that Yieh Hsing had no shipments during the period of review (POR).5 Following publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from interested parties regarding Yieh Hsing. As a result, and because the record contains no evidence to the contrary, we continue to find that 1 See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015– 2016, 82 FR 22805 (May 18, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan; 2015–2016,’’ dated May 10, 2017 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 2 See Petitioner’s June 19, 2017, Case Brief (Petitioner Case Brief). 3 See Shin Yang’s June 27, 2017, Rebuttal Brief (Shin Yang Rebuttal). 4 A full written description of the scope of the order is contained in Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan; 2015–2016,’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice and incorporated herein by reference. 5 See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 22806, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 2–3. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 55093 Yieh Hsing made no shipments during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with the Department’s practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Yieh Hsing, but exported by other parties without their own rate, at the all-others rate.6 Analysis of the Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made a change to the Preliminary Results. For Shin Yang, we adjusted the home market calculation program to correct an error related to surrogate production costs. For a full discussion of all comments received, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, we determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists: Producer/exporter Dumping margin (percent) Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd ............ 1.78 Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final results of review within five days of the date of 6 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM 20NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 222 (Monday, November 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55091-55093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-964]


Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


[[Page 55092]]


SUMMARY: On August 8, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on seamless refined copper pipe and tube from 
the People's Republic of China (PRC) for the period of review (POR), 
November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016. For the final results of 
this review, the Department continues to determine that the five 
remaining companies under review failed to establish their eligibility 
for a separate rate for the POR, and thus, are part of the PRC-wide 
entity. The final dumping margin of sales at the PRC-Wide Entity rate 
is listed below in the ``Final Results'' section of this notice.

DATES: Applicable November 20, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Hancock or Courtney Canales, AD/
CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1394 or (202) 
482-4997, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On August 8, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Results 
of the antidumping duty order on seamless refined copper pipe and tube 
from the PRC.\1\ We invited parties to submit comments on the 
Preliminary Results, but we received no comments. The Department 
conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People's 
Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 37058 
(August 8, 2017) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum) (collectively, Preliminary 
Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is seamless refined copper 
pipe and tube. The product is currently classified under Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 7411.10.1030 
and 7411.10.1090. Products subject to this order may also enter under 
HTSUS item numbers 7407.10.1500, 7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and 
8415.90.8085. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this 
order remains dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For a full description of the scope of the Order, see 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    As noted above, we received no comments on the Preliminary Results.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    As no parties submitted comments on the Preliminary Results, the 
Department has not modified its analysis from that presented in the 
Preliminary Results, and no decision memorandum accompanies this 
Federal Register notice. Further, the Department has made no 
adjustments to the determination that China Hailiang Metal Trading 
(China Hailiang), Shanghai Hailiang Metal Trading Limited (Shanghai 
Hailiang Trading), Hong Kong Hailiang, Shanghai Hailiang, and Zhejiang 
Hailiang did not demonstrate that they are entitled to a separate rate. 
Accordingly, we continue to determine it appropriate to consider all 
five companies to be part of the PRC-Wide entity.\3\ The rate 
previously established for the PRC-wide entity is 60.85 percent.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 4-5. Pursuant to the 
Department's change in practice, the Department no longer considers 
the non-market economy (NME) entity as an exporter conditionally 
subject to administrative reviews. See Antidumping Proceedings: 
Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of 
the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 
FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). Under this practice, the NME 
entity will not be under review unless a party specifically 
requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. 
Because no party requested a review of the entity, the entity is not 
under review and the entity's rate is not subject to change.
    \4\ The rate for the PRC-Wide Entity was first assigned in the 
less than fair value investigation of seamless refined copper pipe 
and tube from the PRC, see Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube 
from the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value, 75 FR 60725, 60729 (October 1, 2010). This 
rate has been used in each subsequent administrative review in which 
there was a party being considered as part of the PRC-Wide Entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results

    The final weighted-average dumping margin is as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Weighted-
                   Exporter/producer                     average dumping
                                                            margin (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-Wide Entity \5\....................................           60.85
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    We have not calculated any assessment (or cash deposit) rates in 
this administrative review, because the five companies under review are 
a part of the PRC-wide entity. The Department intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of 
the final results of this administrative review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The PRC-wide entity includes China Hailiang, Shanghai 
Hailiang Trading, Hong Kong Hailiang, Shanghai Hailiang, and 
Zhejiang Hailiang.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously 
investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above 
that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-
specific rate; (2) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that 
have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be that for the PRC-Wide rate (i.e., 60.85 percent); and (3) 
for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not received 
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to 
the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Disclosure

    Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the 
calculations performed in connection with the final results within five 
days of its public announcement, or if there is no public announcement, 
within five days of the date of publication of this notice in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because the Department 
determined that China Hailiang, Shanghai Hailiang Trading, Hong Kong 
Hailiang, Shanghai Hailiang, and Zhejiang Hailiang are part of the PRC-
wide entity, and have been assigned the PRC-wide rate, there are no 
calculations to disclose.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

[[Page 55093]]

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order 
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the 
terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 
351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: November 13, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties for the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-25085 Filed 11-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P