Self-Regulatory Organizations; Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 to Proposed Rule Change To Amend MSRB Rule G-34, on CUSIP Numbers, New Issue, and Market Information Requirements, 54455-54457 [2017-24928]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2017 / Notices IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– BatsEDGX–2017–47 on the subject line. Paper Comments sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–BatsEDGX–2017–47. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–BatsEDGX–2017–47 and should be submitted on or before December 8, 2017. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Nov 16, 2017 Jkt 244001 For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.13 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017–24932 Filed 11–16–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–82053; File No. SR–MSRB– 2017–06] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 to Proposed Rule Change To Amend MSRB Rule G–34, on CUSIP Numbers, New Issue, and Market Information Requirements November 13, 2017. I. Introduction On August 30, 2017, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (‘‘MSRB’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change consisting of amendments to Rule G–34 on CUSIP numbers, new issue, and market information requirements. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on September 18, 2017.3 The Commission received eleven comment letters on the proposal.4 On 13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 Exchange Act Release No. 81595 (September 13, 2017), 82 FR 43587 (‘‘Notice’’). The comment period closed on October 10, 2017. 4 See Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (‘‘SIFMA’’), dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Susan Gaffney, Executive Director, National Association of Municipal Advisors (‘‘NAMA’’), dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Steve Apfelbacher, President, EHLERS Inc., dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Noreen P. White, Co-President, and Kim W. Whelan, Co-President, Acacia Financial Group, Inc., dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Cristeena G. Naser, Vice President and Senior Counsel, American Bankers Association (‘‘ABA’’), dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Michael G. Sudsina, President, Sudsina & Associates, LLC, dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Marianne F. Edmonds, Senior Managing Director, Public Resources Advisory Group (‘‘PRAG’’), dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Emily Swenson Brock, Director, Federal Liaison Center, Government Finance Officers Association (‘‘GFOA’’), dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Peter Warms, Senior Manager of Fixed 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00140 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 54455 October 18, 2017, the MSRB granted an extension of time for the Commission to act on the filing until December 15, 2017. On November 7, 2017, the MSRB responded to the comments 5 and filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change (‘‘Amendment No. 1’’). The text of Amendment No. 1 is available on the MSRB’s Web site.6 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change from interested persons. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Amendment In response to concerns raised in the comments, the MSRB is proposing to amend proposed paragraph Rule G– 34(a)(i)(F) of the proposed rule change to require dealers (and municipal advisors in a competitive sale) seeking to rely on the principles-based exception to reasonably believe the purchaser’s present intent is to hold the municipal securities to maturity ‘‘or earlier redemption or mandatory tender.’’ 7 The MSRB believes the proposed rule change should be amended to more accurately reflect the terms of direct purchase transactions including the potential for earlier redemption or mandatory tender.8 The MSRB is proposing this same amendment to the proposed principlesbased exception for dealers from the depository eligibility requirements of the rule set forth in proposed subparagraph Rule G–34(a)(ii)(A)(3) for consistency.9 The MSRB stated that this provision would clarify that the depository eligibility requirements of Rule G–34(a)(ii)(A) do not apply to municipal securities included in the principles-based exception.10 In response to concerns raised in the comments, the MSRB also is proposing amending the proposed rule change to Income, Entity, Regulatory Content and Symbology, Bloomberg L.P., dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Dennis Dix, Principal, DIXWORKS LLC, dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Stephan Wolf, CEO, Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (‘‘GLEIF’’), dated October 9, 2017. Staff from the Office of Municipal Securities discussed the proposed rule change with representatives from PFM Financial Advisors LLC and PFM Asset Management LLC on October 26, 2017. 5 See Letter from Margaret R. Blake, Associate General Counsel, MSRB, to Secretary, SEC, dated November 7, 2017 (‘‘MSRB Response Letter’’), available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-msrb2017-06/msrb201706-2674227-161458.pdf. 6 Amendment No. 1 is available at https:// www.msrb.org/∼/media/Files/SEC-Filings/2017/ MSRB-2017-06-A-1.ashx. 7 See Amendment No. 1. 8 Id. 9 Id. 10 Id. E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 54456 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2017 / Notices expand the principles-based exception in proposed paragraph Rule G– 34(a)(i)(F) to include cases where a municipal entity purchases the municipal securities with funds that are at least in part proceeds of the purchasing entity’s issue of municipal obligations, or the municipal securities being purchased are used to fully or partially secure or pay the purchasing entity’s issue of municipal obligations.11 The MSRB believes that certain sales of municipal securities to municipal entities should be excepted from the CUSIP number requirements for the same policy reasons underlying the principles-based exception for purchases by banks and their non-dealer control affiliates.12 In particular, the MSRB believes that where a municipal entity is purchasing municipal securities using funds that are at least in part proceeds of that purchasing entity’s issuance of other municipal obligations, or where the municipal securities being purchased are used to fully or partially secure or pay the purchasing entity’s issue of municipal obligations, there is a strong expectation that the purchase of the underlying municipal securities is intended to be held and not traded in the secondary market.13 As with the exception for dealers (or municipal advisors in a competitive sale) engaging in direct purchase transactions of new issue municipal securities to banks, the MSRB believes that requiring a CUSIP number in these scenarios would not serve the purposes of Rule G–34 to, among other things, improve efficiencies in the processing, receiving, delivering and safekeeping of municipal securities.14 The MSRB also believes that, just as in the case of purchases by banks and their non-dealer control affiliates, for a dealer (or municipal advisor in a competitive sale) to rely on the principles-based exception in this instance, it would be required to have a reasonable belief (e.g., by obtaining a written representation) that the purchasing municipal entity has the present intent to hold the municipal securities to maturity or earlier redemption or mandatory tender.15 The MSRB is also proposing this same amendment to the principles-based exception for dealers from the depository eligibility requirements of the rule set forth in subparagraph Rule G–34(a)(ii)(A).16 In response to comments that the principles-based exception should apply to all sales of municipal securities from one municipal entity to another where a dealer (or municipal advisor in a competitive sale) is engaged, the MSRB stated that it disagrees.17 The MSRB stated that the principles-based exception is meant to facilitate financings by permitting the underwriting of new issue municipal securities by dealers (or advising by municipal advisors in a competitive sale) without requiring application be made for a CUSIP number where such new issues are not intended to trade in the secondary market.18 However, the MSRB stated that it understands that a municipal entity purchasing municipal securities for investment purposes may find itself in need of liquidity and thus may look to resell those municipal securities into the secondary market.19 In this instance, the MSRB stated, the holder of the municipal securities may find itself unable to readily resell the municipal securities because there is no CUSIP number and, based on discussions with industry participants, the MSRB stated that it understands there is also no established process for obtaining a CUSIP number at that late stage for secondary market trading.20 The MSRB believes that by applying for the CUSIP number on the new issue up front, the dealer (or municipal advisor in a competitive sale) avoids these potential problems and ensures that this important aspect needed for secondary market trading is in place.21 As a result, the MSRB stated that it does not believe the principles-based exception should be expanded to create a generalized private placement exception for all sales of municipal securities to another municipal entity where a dealer (or a municipal advisor in a competitive sale) is engaged, but rather, should be limited as set forth above.22 The MSRB is proposing to make the proposed rule change effective six months after Commission approval and is requesting accelerated approval of Amendment No. 1.23 The MSRB believes the Commission has good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, for granting accelerated approval of Amendment No. 1.24 The MSRB believes that the only substantive change to the proposed rule change is 17 Id. 18 Id. responsive to commenters and expands the application of the previously proposed principles-based exception to include sales of new issue municipal securities to municipal entities that are purchasing the underlying municipal securities with funds that are at least in part proceeds of the purchasing entity’s issue of municipal obligations, or the municipal securities being purchased are used to fully or partially secure or pay the purchasing entity’s issue of municipal obligations.25 The MSRB believes that the other amendment to the proposed rule change merely clarifies that in a direct purchase transaction there may be a redemption or mandatory tender that occurs prior to the municipal security’s maturity.26 The MSRB also stated that, in light of one of the purposes of the principles-based exception in the proposed rule change— to allow dealers and municipal advisors to provide services without inhibiting their issuer clients’ access to certain financings—the revisions are consistent with the proposed rule change and are unlikely to be controversial.27 III. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the filing as amended by Amendment No. 1 is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– MSRB–2017–06 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–MSRB–2017–06. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the 11 Id. 19 Id. 12 Id. 20 Id. 13 Id. 21 Id. 14 Id. 22 Id. 25 Id. 15 Id. 23 Id. 26 Id. 16 Id. 24 Id. 27 Id. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Nov 16, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00141 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2017 / Notices Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the MSRB. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–MSRB–2017–06 and should be submitted on or before December 1, 2017. For the Commission, pursuant to delegated authority.28 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–82062; File No. SR– NASDAQ–2017–119] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 7014 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES November 13, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on November 1, 2017, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change [FR Doc. 2017–24928 Filed 11–16–17; 8:45 am] 28 17 I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to (1) change the volume requirement for purposes of determining eligibility for a transaction fee under the Qualified Market Maker Program; and (2) eliminate one of the tiers of the Nasdaq Growth Program. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange’s transaction fees at Rule 7014 to (1) change the volume requirement for purposes of determining eligibility for a transaction fee under the Qualified Market Maker (‘‘QMM’’) Program; and (2) eliminate one of the tiers of the Nasdaq Growth Program. QMM Program A QMM is a member that makes a significant contribution to market quality by providing liquidity at the national best bid and offer (‘‘NBBO’’) in a large number of stocks for a significant portion of the day.3 In addition, the member must avoid imposing the burdens on Nasdaq and its market participants that may be associated with excessive rates of entry of orders away from the inside and/or order cancellation. The designation reflects the QMM’s commitment to provide meaningful and consistent support to market quality and price discovery by extensive quoting at the NBBO in a large number of securities. In return for its 1 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Nov 16, 2017 3 See Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Rule 7014(d). Frm 00142 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 54457 contributions, certain financial benefits are provided to a QMM with respect to its order activity, as described under Rule 7014(e). For example, Nasdaq will provide QMMs a rebate per share executed with respect to all other displayed orders (other than Designated Retail Orders, as defined in Rule 7018) in securities priced at $1 or more per share that provide liquidity and were for securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’), securities listed on exchanges other than Nasdaq and NYSE, or securities listed on Nasdaq. Nasdaq also charges QMMs a lower rate for executions of orders in securities priced at $1 or more per share that access liquidity on the Nasdaq Market Center.4 Under Rule 7014(e), the Exchange charges a QMM $0.0030 per share executed for removing liquidity on Nasdaq in Nasdaq-listed securities priced at $1 or more. The Exchange also charges a QMM $0.00295 per share executed for removing liquidity on Nasdaq in securities priced at $1 or more per share that are listed on exchanges other than Nasdaq, if the QMM’s volume of liquidity added through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs during the month (as a percentage of Consolidated Volume) is not less than 0.80%.5 For a QMM that meets the criteria of Tier 2,6 the Exchange assesses a charge of $0.0029 per share executed for removing liquidity in securities priced at $1 or more per share listed on exchanges other than Nasdaq if the QMM has a combined Consolidated Volume (adding and removing liquidity) of at least 3.7%. Nasdaq is now proposing to change the volume threshold needed to qualify for the transaction fee of $0.00295 per share executed for non-Nasdaq-listed securities for removing liquidity on Nasdaq in securities priced at $1 or more. Currently, the QMM’s volume of liquidity added through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs during 4 See Rule 7014(e). set forth in Rule 7014(h), the term ‘‘Consolidated Volume’’ has the same meaning as the term has under Rule 7018(a). That term is defined in Rule 7018(a) to mean ‘‘the total consolidated volume reported to all consolidated transaction reporting plans by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities during a month in equity securities, excluding executed orders with a size of less than one round lot. For purposes of calculating Consolidated Volume and the extent of a member’s trading activity the date of the annual reconstitution of the Russell Investments Indexes shall be excluded from both total Consolidated Volume and the member’s trading activity.’’ 6 As set forth in Rule 7014(e), the QMM Tier 2 qualification criteria requires a QMM to execute shares of liquidity provided in all securities through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs that represent above 0.90% of Consolidated Volume during the month. 5 As E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 221 (Friday, November 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54455-54457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82053; File No. SR-MSRB-2017-06]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Municipal Securities Rulemaking 
Board; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 to Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend MSRB Rule G-34, on CUSIP Numbers, New Issue, and Market 
Information Requirements

November 13, 2017.

I. Introduction

    On August 30, 2017, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board 
(``MSRB'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' 
or ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'' or ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change consisting of amendments to Rule 
G-34 on CUSIP numbers, new issue, and market information requirements. 
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal 
Register on September 18, 2017.\3\ The Commission received eleven 
comment letters on the proposal.\4\ On October 18, 2017, the MSRB 
granted an extension of time for the Commission to act on the filing 
until December 15, 2017. On November 7, 2017, the MSRB responded to the 
comments \5\ and filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change 
(``Amendment No. 1''). The text of Amendment No. 1 is available on the 
MSRB's Web site.\6\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change from interested 
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Exchange Act Release No. 81595 (September 13, 2017), 82 FR 
43587 (``Notice''). The comment period closed on October 10, 2017.
    \4\ See Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Leslie M. Norwood, 
Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, Securities Industry 
and Financial Markets Association (``SIFMA''), dated October 10, 
2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Susan Gaffney, Executive 
Director, National Association of Municipal Advisors (``NAMA''), 
dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Steve 
Apfelbacher, President, EHLERS Inc., dated October 10, 2017; Letter 
to Secretary, Commission, from Noreen P. White, Co-President, and 
Kim W. Whelan, Co-President, Acacia Financial Group, Inc., dated 
October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Cristeena G. 
Naser, Vice President and Senior Counsel, American Bankers 
Association (``ABA''), dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, 
Commission, from Michael G. Sudsina, President, Sudsina & 
Associates, LLC, dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, 
Commission, from Marianne F. Edmonds, Senior Managing Director, 
Public Resources Advisory Group (``PRAG''), dated October 10, 2017; 
Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Emily Swenson Brock, Director, 
Federal Liaison Center, Government Finance Officers Association 
(``GFOA''), dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, Commission, 
from Peter Warms, Senior Manager of Fixed Income, Entity, Regulatory 
Content and Symbology, Bloomberg L.P., dated October 10, 2017; 
Letter to Secretary, Commission, from Dennis Dix, Principal, 
DIXWORKS LLC, dated October 10, 2017; Letter to Secretary, 
Commission, from Stephan Wolf, CEO, Global Legal Entity Identifier 
Foundation (``GLEIF''), dated October 9, 2017. Staff from the Office 
of Municipal Securities discussed the proposed rule change with 
representatives from PFM Financial Advisors LLC and PFM Asset 
Management LLC on October 26, 2017.
    \5\ See Letter from Margaret R. Blake, Associate General 
Counsel, MSRB, to Secretary, SEC, dated November 7, 2017 (``MSRB 
Response Letter''), available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-msrb-2017-06/msrb201706-2674227-161458.pdf.
    \6\ Amendment No. 1 is available at https://www.msrb.org/~/media/
Files/SEC-Filings/2017/MSRB-2017-06-A-1.ashx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Amendment

    In response to concerns raised in the comments, the MSRB is 
proposing to amend proposed paragraph Rule G-34(a)(i)(F) of the 
proposed rule change to require dealers (and municipal advisors in a 
competitive sale) seeking to rely on the principles-based exception to 
reasonably believe the purchaser's present intent is to hold the 
municipal securities to maturity ``or earlier redemption or mandatory 
tender.'' \7\ The MSRB believes the proposed rule change should be 
amended to more accurately reflect the terms of direct purchase 
transactions including the potential for earlier redemption or 
mandatory tender.\8\ The MSRB is proposing this same amendment to the 
proposed principles-based exception for dealers from the depository 
eligibility requirements of the rule set forth in proposed subparagraph 
Rule G-34(a)(ii)(A)(3) for consistency.\9\ The MSRB stated that this 
provision would clarify that the depository eligibility requirements of 
Rule G-34(a)(ii)(A) do not apply to municipal securities included in 
the principles-based exception.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Amendment No. 1.
    \8\ Id.
    \9\ Id.
    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In response to concerns raised in the comments, the MSRB also is 
proposing amending the proposed rule change to

[[Page 54456]]

expand the principles-based exception in proposed paragraph Rule G-
34(a)(i)(F) to include cases where a municipal entity purchases the 
municipal securities with funds that are at least in part proceeds of 
the purchasing entity's issue of municipal obligations, or the 
municipal securities being purchased are used to fully or partially 
secure or pay the purchasing entity's issue of municipal 
obligations.\11\ The MSRB believes that certain sales of municipal 
securities to municipal entities should be excepted from the CUSIP 
number requirements for the same policy reasons underlying the 
principles-based exception for purchases by banks and their non-dealer 
control affiliates.\12\ In particular, the MSRB believes that where a 
municipal entity is purchasing municipal securities using funds that 
are at least in part proceeds of that purchasing entity's issuance of 
other municipal obligations, or where the municipal securities being 
purchased are used to fully or partially secure or pay the purchasing 
entity's issue of municipal obligations, there is a strong expectation 
that the purchase of the underlying municipal securities is intended to 
be held and not traded in the secondary market.\13\ As with the 
exception for dealers (or municipal advisors in a competitive sale) 
engaging in direct purchase transactions of new issue municipal 
securities to banks, the MSRB believes that requiring a CUSIP number in 
these scenarios would not serve the purposes of Rule G-34 to, among 
other things, improve efficiencies in the processing, receiving, 
delivering and safekeeping of municipal securities.\14\ The MSRB also 
believes that, just as in the case of purchases by banks and their non-
dealer control affiliates, for a dealer (or municipal advisor in a 
competitive sale) to rely on the principles-based exception in this 
instance, it would be required to have a reasonable belief (e.g., by 
obtaining a written representation) that the purchasing municipal 
entity has the present intent to hold the municipal securities to 
maturity or earlier redemption or mandatory tender.\15\ The MSRB is 
also proposing this same amendment to the principles-based exception 
for dealers from the depository eligibility requirements of the rule 
set forth in subparagraph Rule G-34(a)(ii)(A).\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Id.
    \12\ Id.
    \13\ Id.
    \14\ Id.
    \15\ Id.
    \16\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In response to comments that the principles-based exception should 
apply to all sales of municipal securities from one municipal entity to 
another where a dealer (or municipal advisor in a competitive sale) is 
engaged, the MSRB stated that it disagrees.\17\ The MSRB stated that 
the principles-based exception is meant to facilitate financings by 
permitting the underwriting of new issue municipal securities by 
dealers (or advising by municipal advisors in a competitive sale) 
without requiring application be made for a CUSIP number where such new 
issues are not intended to trade in the secondary market.\18\ However, 
the MSRB stated that it understands that a municipal entity purchasing 
municipal securities for investment purposes may find itself in need of 
liquidity and thus may look to resell those municipal securities into 
the secondary market.\19\ In this instance, the MSRB stated, the holder 
of the municipal securities may find itself unable to readily resell 
the municipal securities because there is no CUSIP number and, based on 
discussions with industry participants, the MSRB stated that it 
understands there is also no established process for obtaining a CUSIP 
number at that late stage for secondary market trading.\20\ The MSRB 
believes that by applying for the CUSIP number on the new issue up 
front, the dealer (or municipal advisor in a competitive sale) avoids 
these potential problems and ensures that this important aspect needed 
for secondary market trading is in place.\21\ As a result, the MSRB 
stated that it does not believe the principles-based exception should 
be expanded to create a generalized private placement exception for all 
sales of municipal securities to another municipal entity where a 
dealer (or a municipal advisor in a competitive sale) is engaged, but 
rather, should be limited as set forth above.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Id.
    \18\ Id.
    \19\ Id.
    \20\ Id.
    \21\ Id.
    \22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The MSRB is proposing to make the proposed rule change effective 
six months after Commission approval and is requesting accelerated 
approval of Amendment No. 1.\23\ The MSRB believes the Commission has 
good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, for granting 
accelerated approval of Amendment No. 1.\24\ The MSRB believes that the 
only substantive change to the proposed rule change is responsive to 
commenters and expands the application of the previously proposed 
principles-based exception to include sales of new issue municipal 
securities to municipal entities that are purchasing the underlying 
municipal securities with funds that are at least in part proceeds of 
the purchasing entity's issue of municipal obligations, or the 
municipal securities being purchased are used to fully or partially 
secure or pay the purchasing entity's issue of municipal 
obligations.\25\ The MSRB believes that the other amendment to the 
proposed rule change merely clarifies that in a direct purchase 
transaction there may be a redemption or mandatory tender that occurs 
prior to the municipal security's maturity.\26\ The MSRB also stated 
that, in light of one of the purposes of the principles-based exception 
in the proposed rule change--to allow dealers and municipal advisors to 
provide services without inhibiting their issuer clients' access to 
certain financings--the revisions are consistent with the proposed rule 
change and are unlikely to be controversial.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Id.
    \24\ Id.
    \25\ Id.
    \26\ Id.
    \27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the filing as 
amended by Amendment No. 1 is consistent with the Act. Comments may be 
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-MSRB-2017-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MSRB-2017-06. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the

[[Page 54457]]

Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the MSRB. All comments received 
will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-MSRB-2017-06 and should be submitted on 
or before December 1, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, pursuant to delegated authority.\28\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24928 Filed 11-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.