Certain Wireless Audio Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint, 53520-53521 [2017-24824]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
53520
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 220 / Thursday, November 16, 2017 / Notices
We are soliciting comments on the
proposed ICR that is described below.
We are especially interested in public
comment addressing the following
issues: (1) Is the collection necessary to
the proper functions of BSEE; (2) Will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) Is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) How might BSEE
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(5) How might BSEE minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Abstract: BSEE will use the
information required by 30 CFR 282 to
determine if lessees are complying with
the regulations that implement the
mining operations program for minerals
other than oil, gas, and sulphur.
Specifically, BSEE will use the
information:
• To ensure that operations for the
production of minerals other than oil,
gas, and sulphur in the OCS are
conducted in a manner that will result
in orderly resource recovery,
development, and the protection of the
human, marine, and coastal
environments.
• To ensure that adequate measures
will be taken during operations to
prevent waste, conserve the natural
resources of the OCS, and to protect the
environment, human life, and
correlative rights.
• To determine if suspensions of
activities are in the national interest, to
facilitate proper development of a lease
including reasonable time to develop a
mine and construct its supporting
facilities, and to allow for the
construction or negotiation for use of
transportation facilities.
• To identify and evaluate the
cause(s) of a hazard(s) generating a
suspension, the potential damage from a
hazard(s) and the measures available to
mitigate the potential for damage.
• For technical evaluations that
provide a basis for BSEE to make
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 Nov 15, 2017
Jkt 244001
informed decisions to approve,
disapprove, or require modification of
the proposed activities.
Title of Collection: 30 CFR part 282—
Operations in the Outer Continental
Shelf for Minerals Other than Oil, Gas,
and Sulphur.
OMB Control Number: 1014–0021.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Potential respondents comprise Federal
OCS oil, gas, and sulphur lessees/
operators.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: As there are no active
respondents, we estimated the potential
annual number of respondents to be
one.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 16.
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: Varies from 1 hour to 20
hours, depending on activity.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 56.
Respondent’s Obligation: Most
responses are mandatory, while others
are required to obtain or retain benefits,
or are voluntary.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion
and varies by section.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour
Burden Cost: We have identified one
non-hour cost burden. Pursuant to
§ 282.13(e)(1), a site-specific study to
determine and evaluate hazards that
results in a suspension of operation
would have a non-hour cost burden.
Since this has not been done to date, we
estimated that the cost of such a study
for industry would be approximately
$100,000 to comply with the
requirement. We have not identified any
other non-hour cost burdens associated
with this collection of information.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Dated: October 11, 2017.
Doug Morris,
Chief, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. 2017–24815 Filed 11–15–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1071]
Certain Wireless Audio Systems and
Components Thereof; Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Granting Complainant’s
Motion for Leave To Amend the
Complaint
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 9) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’),
granting complainant’s motion for leave
to amend the complaint in the abovecaptioned investigation
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2392. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on September 15, 2017, based on a
complaint filed by Broadcom Limited of
San Jose, California; and Avago
Technologies General IP (Singapore)
Pte. Ltd. of Singapore (collectively,
‘‘Broadcom’’). 82 FR 43404 (Sep. 15,
2017). The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain wireless
audio systems and components thereof
by reason of infringement of claim 20 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,684,060. The
complaint further alleges that an
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 220 / Thursday, November 16, 2017 / Notices
industry in the United States exists as
required by 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(2). The
notice of investigation named DTS, Inc.
of Calabasas, California; Phorus, Inc. of
Calabasas, California; MartinLogan, Ltd.
of Lawrence, Kansas; Paradigm
Electronics Inc. of Ontario, Canada;
Anthem Electronics, Inc. of Ontario,
Canada; Wren Sound Systems, LLC of
Phoenixville, Pennsylvania; McIntosh
Laboratory, Inc. of Binghamton, New
York; Definitive Technology of Owings
Mills, Maryland; and Polk Audio Inc. of
Vista, California, as respondents. The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations is
also a party in this investigation.
On September 20, 2017, Broadcom
filed a motion for leave to file a second
amended complaint. Broadcom sought
to amend the complaint to: (1)
Incorporate additional information that
was set forth in a pre-institution letter
to the Commission on August 29, 2017;
(2) correct the names for certain
respondents; and (3) add an additional
domestic industry claim related to
another licensee of the asserted patent.
On October 2, 2017, Respondents filed
a response opposing only the addition
of a new domestic industry claim. The
ALJ issued the subject ID granting the
motion on October 24, 2017. The ALJ
found that Broadcom has shown good
cause to amend the complaint under
Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1). See
Order No. 9 at 2–3 (Oct. 24, 2017).
No petitions for review were filed.
The Commission has determined not to
review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part
210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 13, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–24824 Filed 11–15–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–588 and 731–
TA–1392–1393 (Preliminary)]
Polytetrafluoroethylene (‘‘PTFE’’) Resin
From China and India
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 Nov 15, 2017
Jkt 244001
States International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant
to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’),
that there is a reasonable indication that
an industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
of PTFE resin from China and India,
provided for in statistical reporting
numbers 3904.61.0010 and
3904.61.0090 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States, that are
alleged to be sold in the United States
at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’) and by
reason of imports of PTFE resin from
India that are alleged to be subsidized
by the government of India.
Commencement of Final Phase
Investigations
Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
also gives notice of the commencement
of the final phase of its investigations.
The Commission will issue a final phase
notice of scheduling, which will be
published in the Federal Register as
provided in section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules, upon notice from
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative
preliminary determinations in the
investigations under sections 703(b) or
733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary
determinations are negative, upon
notice of affirmative final
determinations in those investigations
under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the
Act. Parties that filed entries of
appearance in the preliminary phase of
the investigations need not enter a
separate appearance for the final phase
of the investigations. Industrial users,
and, if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level,
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations. The
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to the investigations.
Background
On September 28, 2017, The
Chemours Company FC LLC,
Wilmington, Delaware, filed petitions
with the Commission and Commerce,
alleging that an industry in the United
States is materially injured or
threatened with material injury by
reason of LTFV and subsidized imports
of PTFE resin from India and LTFV
imports of PTFE resin from China.
Accordingly, effective September 28,
2017, the Commission, pursuant to
sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19
U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)), instituted
countervailing duty investigation No.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53521
701–TA–588 and antidumping duty
investigation Nos. 731–TA–1392 and
1393 (Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of October 4, 2017 (82
FR 46284). The conference was held in
Washington, DC, on October 19, 2017,
and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to sections
703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It completed
and filed its determinations in these
investigations on November 13, 2017.
The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4741
(November 2017), entitled
Polytetrafluoroethylene (‘‘PTFE’’) Resin
from China and India: Investigation
Nos. 701–TA–588 and 731–TA–1392–
1393 (Preliminary).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 13, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–24875 Filed 11–15–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 332–562 and 332–563]
Global Digital Trade 2: The Businessto-Business Market, Key Foreign Trade
Restrictions, and U.S.
Competitiveness; and Global Digital
Trade 3: The Business-to-Consumer
Market, Key Foreign Trade
Restrictions, and U.S.
Competitiveness; Proposed
Information Collection; Comment
Request; Global Digital Trade
Questionnaire
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the U.S. International Trade
Commission (Commission) hereby gives
notice that it plans to submit a request
for approval of a questionnaire to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and requests public
comment on its draft proposed
collection.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53520-53521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24824]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1071]
Certain Wireless Audio Systems and Components Thereof; Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting
Complainant's Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 9) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ''), granting complainant's motion for leave to amend the
complaint in the above-captioned investigation
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on September 15, 2017, based on a complaint filed by Broadcom Limited
of San Jose, California; and Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore)
Pte. Ltd. of Singapore (collectively, ``Broadcom''). 82 FR 43404 (Sep.
15, 2017). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in
the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and
the sale within the United States after importation of certain wireless
audio systems and components thereof by reason of infringement of claim
20 of U.S. Patent No. 6,684,060. The complaint further alleges that an
[[Page 53521]]
industry in the United States exists as required by 19 U.S.C.
1337(a)(2). The notice of investigation named DTS, Inc. of Calabasas,
California; Phorus, Inc. of Calabasas, California; MartinLogan, Ltd. of
Lawrence, Kansas; Paradigm Electronics Inc. of Ontario, Canada; Anthem
Electronics, Inc. of Ontario, Canada; Wren Sound Systems, LLC of
Phoenixville, Pennsylvania; McIntosh Laboratory, Inc. of Binghamton,
New York; Definitive Technology of Owings Mills, Maryland; and Polk
Audio Inc. of Vista, California, as respondents. The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations is also a party in this investigation.
On September 20, 2017, Broadcom filed a motion for leave to file a
second amended complaint. Broadcom sought to amend the complaint to:
(1) Incorporate additional information that was set forth in a pre-
institution letter to the Commission on August 29, 2017; (2) correct
the names for certain respondents; and (3) add an additional domestic
industry claim related to another licensee of the asserted patent. On
October 2, 2017, Respondents filed a response opposing only the
addition of a new domestic industry claim. The ALJ issued the subject
ID granting the motion on October 24, 2017. The ALJ found that Broadcom
has shown good cause to amend the complaint under Commission Rule
210.14(b)(1). See Order No. 9 at 2-3 (Oct. 24, 2017).
No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined
not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR
part 210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 13, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-24824 Filed 11-15-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P