Stainless Steel Bar From India: Preliminary Determination of No Shipments and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 51601-51602 [2017-24172]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Notices
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–24209 Filed 11–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–810]
Stainless Steel Bar From India:
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments and Partial Rescission of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) is
conducting an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar (SSB) from India. The period
of review (POR) is February 1, 2016,
through January 31, 2017. This review
covers two producers or exporters of the
subject merchandise: Ambica Steels
Limited (Ambica), and Bhansali Bright
Bars Pvt. Ltd. (Bhansali). We
preliminarily determine that Bhansali
and Ambica had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable: November 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Kennedy, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7883.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is SSB. SSB means articles of stainless
steel in straight lengths that have been
either hot-rolled, forged, turned, colddrawn, cold-rolled or otherwise coldfinished, or ground, having a uniform
solid cross section along their whole
length in the shape of circles, segments
of circles, ovals, rectangles (including
squares), triangles, hexagons, octagons,
or other convex polygons. SSB includes
cold-finished SSBs that are turned or
ground in straight lengths, whether
produced from hot-rolled bar or from
straightened and cut rod or wire, and
reinforcing bars that have indentations,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Nov 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
ribs, grooves, or other deformations
produced during the rolling process.
Except as specified above, the term
does not include stainless steel semifinished products, cut-to-length flatrolled products (i.e., cut-to-length rolled
products which if less than 4.75 mm in
thickness have a width measuring at
least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75
mm or more in thickness having a width
which exceeds 150 mm and measures at
least twice the thickness), wire (i.e.,
cold-formed products in coils, of any
uniform solid cross section along their
whole length, which do not conform to
the definition of flat-rolled products),
and angles, shapes, and sections.
Imports of these products are
currently classifiable under subheadings
7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, 7222.19.00,
7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS).
Although the HTS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of the Order is dispositive.
Background
Carpenter Technology Corporation,
Crucible Industries LLC, Electralloy, a
Division of G,O, Carlson, Inc., North
American Stainless, Universal Stainless
& Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna
Slater Stainless, Inc. (the petitioners)
timely requested an administrative
review of Ambica, Bhansali, and
Ambica Stainless Steel Limited (now
known as Aamor Inox Limited) (ASSL).1
As such, the Department published in
the Federal Register a notice of
initiation of this administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on SSB
from India for Ambica and Bhansali.2
Partial Rescission of Administrative
Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the parties that requested a
review withdraw the request within 90
days of the date of publication of the
notice of initiation. The petitioners
timely withdrew their request for review
of ASSL.3 No other party requested a
1 See Letter to the Department from the
petitioners, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar from India:
Petitioners’ Request for 2016/17 Administrative
Review,’’ dated February 28, 2017. Although the
petitioners stated that ‘‘Ambica Stainless Steel
Limited’’ is ‘‘now known as Aamor Inox Limited,’’
the Department has not determined that Aamor
Inox Limited is the successor in interest to Ambica
Stainless Steel Limited.
2 See ‘‘Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,’’ 82
FR 17188 (April 10, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
3 See Letter from the petitioners, ‘‘Stainless Steel
Bar from India—Petitioners’ Request to Withdraw
Request for Administrative Review of Ambica
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51601
review of this producer/exporter.
Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), the Department is
rescinding this review of the AD order
on SSB from the PRC with respect to
ASSL.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
We received timely certifications from
Bhansali and Ambica reporting that they
had no shipments of the subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR and requested that the
Department rescind the review with
respect to it.4 As detailed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the
Department preliminarily determines
that both Bhansali and Ambica had no
shipments during the POR.5
Consistent with our practice, we will
complete the review and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP based
on the final results of this review.6
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case
briefs no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of the preliminary
results.7 Rebuttal briefs, limited to the
issues raised in the case briefs, may be
filed no later than five days after the
submission of case briefs.8 Parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
this proceeding are encouraged to
submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.9
All submissions to the Department
must be filed electronically using
ACCESS, and must also be served on
interested parties.10 An electronically
filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by the
Department’s electronic records system,
Stainless Steel Limited/Aamor Inox Limited,’’ dated
April 24, 2017.
4 See Letter from Bhansali, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar
products from India: Request for No Shipment letter
during the Period of Review (POR),’’ dated March
9, 2017; see also Letter from Ambica Steels Limited,
‘‘Stainless Steel Bar—No Shipments In Period of
Review (POR),’’ dated May 1, 2017.
5 For additional information and analysis, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
6 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of
Review, Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March
24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final
Determination of No Shipments, and Partial
Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51306,
51306–307 (August 28, 2014).
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
8 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
10 See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM
07NON1
51602
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Notices
ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on
the date that the document is due.
Interested parties who wish to request
a hearing must submit a written request
to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
Department of Commerce, using
Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS
system within 30 days of publication of
this notice.11 Requests should contain
(1) the party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of the issues
to be discussed. Issues raised in the
hearing will be limited to those raised
in the respective case briefs.
Unless the deadline is extended
pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Department
intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the
results of our analysis of the issues
raised by the parties in their case and
rebuttal briefs, within 120 days after the
publication of these preliminary results,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Assessment of Antidumping Duties
We are rescinding this review for
ASSL; in accordance with Department
practice, we will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties at the rates equal to
the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse
for consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
Upon issuance of the final results of
this review, in accordance with the
Department’s practice, for entries of
subject merchandise during the POR for
which Ambica or Bhansali did not know
that the merchandise was destined for
the United States, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate such entries at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. We intend to issue
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
publication date of the final results of
this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for Ambica and
Bhansali will remain unchanged from
the rate assigned to each company in the
completed segment for the most recent
11 See
19 CFR 351.310(c).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Nov 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
period for each company; (2) for other
producers and exporters covered in a
prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
completed segment for the most recent
period of this proceeding in which that
producer or exporter participated; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
investigation, but the producer is, then
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the completed segment
for the most recent period of this
proceeding for the producer of subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be 12.45 percent, the
all-others rate established in the
investigation.12 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results of administrative
review in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 31, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–24172 Filed 11–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
12 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar from
India, 59 FR 66915, 66921 (December 28, 1994).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–928]
Uncovered Innerspring Units From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results and Rescission, in
Part, of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on uncovered
innerspring units (innerspring units)
from the People’s Republic of China
(PRC). The period of review (POR) is
February 1, 2016, through January 31,
2017. The Department preliminarily
determines that PT Sunhere Buana
International (PT Sunhere) failed to
cooperate to the best of its ability and
is, therefore, basing its margin on facts
otherwise available with an adverse
inference (AFA). The Department is also
rescinding the administrative review
with respect to Jietai Machinery Ltd.
(HK) (Jietai Machinery). Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Hawkins, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6491.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 19, 2009, the Department
published an antidumping duty order
on innerspring units from the PRC (the
Order).1 On February 28, 2017, Leggett
& Platt, Inc. (the petitioner) submitted a
request for the Department to conduct
an administrative review of the Order
that examines Jietai Machinery and PT
Sunhere’s exports of subject
merchandise made during the POR.2 On
April 10, 2016, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of this administrative
review of the Order concerning Jietai
Machinery and PT Sunhere’s POR
1 See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of Antidumping
Duty Order, 74 FR 7661 (February 19, 2009).
2 See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the
People’s Republic of China: Request for
Antidumping Administrative Review, dated
February 28, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM
07NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51601-51602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24172]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-810]
Stainless Steel Bar From India: Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016-2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the
Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar (SSB) from
India. The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2016, through January
31, 2017. This review covers two producers or exporters of the subject
merchandise: Ambica Steels Limited (Ambica), and Bhansali Bright Bars
Pvt. Ltd. (Bhansali). We preliminarily determine that Bhansali and
Ambica had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable: November 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Kennedy, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7883.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is SSB. SSB means articles of
stainless steel in straight lengths that have been either hot-rolled,
forged, turned, cold-drawn, cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, or
ground, having a uniform solid cross section along their whole length
in the shape of circles, segments of circles, ovals, rectangles
(including squares), triangles, hexagons, octagons, or other convex
polygons. SSB includes cold-finished SSBs that are turned or ground in
straight lengths, whether produced from hot-rolled bar or from
straightened and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars that have
indentations, ribs, grooves, or other deformations produced during the
rolling process.
Except as specified above, the term does not include stainless
steel semi-finished products, cut-to-length flat-rolled products (i.e.,
cut-to-length rolled products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness
have a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm
or more in thickness having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures
at least twice the thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed products in
coils, of any uniform solid cross section along their whole length,
which do not conform to the definition of flat-rolled products), and
angles, shapes, and sections.
Imports of these products are currently classifiable under
subheadings 7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, 7222.19.00, 7222.20.00, 7222.30.00
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). Although the HTS subheadings
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written
description of the scope of the Order is dispositive.
Background
Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible Industries LLC,
Electralloy, a Division of G,O, Carlson, Inc., North American
Stainless, Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna
Slater Stainless, Inc. (the petitioners) timely requested an
administrative review of Ambica, Bhansali, and Ambica Stainless Steel
Limited (now known as Aamor Inox Limited) (ASSL).\1\ As such, the
Department published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of
this administrative review of the antidumping duty order on SSB from
India for Ambica and Bhansali.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Letter to the Department from the petitioners,
``Stainless Steel Bar from India: Petitioners' Request for 2016/17
Administrative Review,'' dated February 28, 2017. Although the
petitioners stated that ``Ambica Stainless Steel Limited'' is ``now
known as Aamor Inox Limited,'' the Department has not determined
that Aamor Inox Limited is the successor in interest to Ambica
Stainless Steel Limited.
\2\ See ``Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews,'' 82 FR 17188 (April 10, 2017) (Initiation
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the parties that
requested a review withdraw the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation. The petitioners timely
withdrew their request for review of ASSL.\3\ No other party requested
a review of this producer/exporter. Therefore, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department is rescinding this review of the AD
order on SSB from the PRC with respect to ASSL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Letter from the petitioners, ``Stainless Steel Bar from
India--Petitioners' Request to Withdraw Request for Administrative
Review of Ambica Stainless Steel Limited/Aamor Inox Limited,'' dated
April 24, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
We received timely certifications from Bhansali and Ambica
reporting that they had no shipments of the subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR and requested that the Department rescind
the review with respect to it.\4\ As detailed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, the Department preliminarily determines that both
Bhansali and Ambica had no shipments during the POR.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Letter from Bhansali, ``Stainless Steel Bar products
from India: Request for No Shipment letter during the Period of
Review (POR),'' dated March 9, 2017; see also Letter from Ambica
Steels Limited, ``Stainless Steel Bar--No Shipments In Period of
Review (POR),'' dated May 1, 2017.
\5\ For additional information and analysis, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with our practice, we will complete the review and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this
review.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand;
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged
in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No
Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 51306,
51306-307 (August 28, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of the preliminary results.\7\ Rebuttal
briefs, limited to the issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed
no later than five days after the submission of case briefs.\8\ Parties
who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for
general filing requirements).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All submissions to the Department must be filed electronically
using ACCESS, and must also be served on interested parties.\10\ An
electronically filed document must be received successfully in its
entirety by the Department's electronic records system,
[[Page 51602]]
ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the date that the document is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and
Compliance's ACCESS system within 30 days of publication of this
notice.\11\ Requests should contain (1) the party's name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised in the respective case briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2), the Department intends to issue the final results of
this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of
the issues raised by the parties in their case and rebuttal briefs,
within 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Assessment of Antidumping Duties
We are rescinding this review for ASSL; in accordance with
Department practice, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties
at the rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
Upon issuance of the final results of this review, in accordance
with the Department's practice, for entries of subject merchandise
during the POR for which Ambica or Bhansali did not know that the
merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for
the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to
issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the
final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Ambica and
Bhansali will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to each company
in the completed segment for the most recent period for each company;
(2) for other producers and exporters covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the completed segment for the most recent
period of this proceeding in which that producer or exporter
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review,
a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is,
then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the
completed segment for the most recent period of this proceeding for the
producer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all
other producers or exporters will continue to be 12.45 percent, the
all-others rate established in the investigation.\12\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar from India, 59 FR 66915, 66921
(December 28, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of
administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 31, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-24172 Filed 11-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
