Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Schedule of Fees, 49447-49450 [2017-23120]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CHX–2017–04 and should
be submitted on or before November 15,
2017.
V. Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendments No. 1 and No. 2
The Commission finds good cause to
approve the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendments No. 1 and No.
2, prior to the 30th day after the date of
publication of notice of Amendments
No. 1 and No. 2 in the Federal Register.
Neither Amendment No. 1 nor
Amendment No. 2 expands the structure
of the proposed rule change as it was
previously published for notice and
comment.177 Rather, the Exchange
circumscribed its proposal to implement
the LEAD during the regular trading
session on a pilot basis to provide an
opportunity to study the impact of the
LEAD Rules on the markets and to
address comments by further explaining
the purpose and the intended impact of
the proposal. Accordingly, the
Commission finds good cause, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange
Act,178 to approve the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendments
No. 1 and No. 2, on an accelerated basis.
VI. Conclusion
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
For the foregoing reasons, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as modified by
Amendments No. 1 and No. 2, is
consistent with the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act 179
that the proposed rule change (SR–
CHX–2017–04), as modified by
Amendments No. 1 and No. 2, be, and
hereby is, approved on an accelerated
basis, subject to a pilot period set to
expire twenty- four months after
implementation of the pilot program.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.180
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–23122 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
supra notes 12 and 13.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
179 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
180 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–81907; File No. SR–MRX–
2017–21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange’s Schedule of Fees
October 19, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
5, 2017, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Schedule of Fees to add new fees for colocation services, direct circuit
connections to the Exchange,
connections to third party services,
point of presence (‘‘POP’’) connectivity,
and connectivity to the Exchange’s Test
Facility (the ‘‘Test Facility’’).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at www.ise.com, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
177 See
178 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:06 Oct 24, 2017
1 15
2 17
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49447
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fee Schedule to eliminate certain fees
associated with legacy options for
connecting to ISE and to replace them
with fees associated with new options
for connecting to the Exchange that are
similar to those that MRX’s sister
exchanges presently offer.
The Exchange is engaged in an
initiative to migrate the Exchange’s
trading system to the Nasdaq INET
architecture. As part of that initiative,
the Exchange proposes to offer
customers various new options to
connect to the Exchange and to assess
fees for such connectivity. The
connectivity options that the Exchange
proposes to offer—colocation, direct
circuit connectivity, connectivity to
third party services, POP connectivity,
and connectivity to the Exchange’s Test
Facility—and the fees that the Exchange
proposes to assess for such connectivity
are similar to those that the Exchange’s
affiliated Nasdaq, Inc. markets—
including The NASDAQ Stock Market,
LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’), Nasdaq BX, Inc.
(‘‘BX’’), and Nasdaq Phlx LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’)—presently offer and assess to
their customers under their respective
rules. They are also the same as the
connectivity options and fees that
Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’) and
Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’) propose to
offer and assess under their respective
rules in tandem with this filing. This
proposal, in other words, seeks to
harmonize the Exchange’s connectivity
offerings and fees with those of its sister
exchanges.
The first new connectivity option that
the Exchange proposes to offer its
customers is co-location. Co-location is
a suite of hardware, power,
telecommunication, and other ancillary
products and services that allow market
participants and vendors to place their
trading and communications equipment
in close physical proximity to the
quoting and execution facilities of the
Exchange and other Nasdaq, Inc.
markets. The Exchange provides colocation services and imposes fees
through Nasdaq Technology Services
LLC and pursuant to agreements with
the owner/operator of its data center
where both the Exchange’s quoting and
trading facilities and co-located
customer equipment are housed. Users
of colocation services include private
extranet providers, data vendors, as well
as Exchange members and non-
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
49448
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices
members. The use of co-location
services is entirely voluntary.
Like its sister exchanges, and as
detailed in the proposed co-location fee
schedule, the Exchange proposes to
impose a uniform, non-discriminatory
set of fees for various co-location
services, including: Fees for co-located
connections to the Exchange and to
third party services (described below) in
various bandwidths; fees for cabinet
space usage, or options for future space
usage; installation and related power
provision for hosted equipment;
connectivity among multiple cabinets
being used by the same customer as well
as customer connectivity to the
Exchange and telecommunications
providers; and related maintenance and
consulting services. Fees related to
cabinet and power usage are
incremental, with additional charges
being imposed based on higher levels of
cabinet and/or power usage, the use of
non-standard cabinet sizes or special
cabinet cooling equipment, or the reselling of cabinet space.
In addition to co-location services, the
Exchange proposes to offer several other
connectivity options for customers that
are located outside of the Exchange’s
primary data center in Carteret, New
Jersey.
First, the Exchange proposes to offer
a ‘‘Direct Circuit Connectivity’’ service,
whereby subscribers may connect their
facilities directly to the Exchange’s
primary data center using a circuit they
obtain from an external
telecommunications provider. For this
form of connectivity, the Exchange’s
proposal offers customers the choice of
1 GB, 1 GB Ultra, and 10 GB
connections. The installation fee for all
such connections will be $1,500 and the
monthly fee will be $7,500 for 10 GB
connections and $2,500 for both 1 GB
and 1 GB connections. The Exchange
also proposes to charge a fee to
customers that choose to install a cable
router in its data center and a monthly
fee for customers that choose to install
equipment in the Exchange’s data center
to support the connectivity.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes an
installation fee of $925 per router,
switch or modem, and a monthly fee of
$150 to rent cabinet space based on a
unit height of approximately 1.75 inches
(commonly called a ‘‘U’’ space) and a
maximum power of 125 Watts per U
space.
Next, the Exchange proposes to offer
a ‘‘POP Connectivity’’ service, whereby
subscribers may use external
telecommunication circuits to connect
directly to one or more of the
Exchange’s satellite data centers (each, a
‘‘POP’’) that are located in places other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:06 Oct 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
than Carteret. Each POP, in turn, has a
fully redundant connection to the
Exchange’s primary data center, such
that subscribers may connect to the
primary data center through its
connection to a POP. For POP
Connectivity to the Exchange, the
Exchange proposes to offer 1 GB Ultra
and 10 GB Ultra connections. The
installation fee for all such connections
will be $1,500 and the monthly fee will
be $7,500 for 10 GB connections and
$2,500 for 1 GB Ultra connections.3
Additionally, the Exchange proposes
to offer connectivity to third party
services. The Exchange is proposing to
offer this service to both non-co-location
customers (via a direct circuit
connection) and co-location customers
alike. This connectivity will enable
customers to receive third party market
data feeds, including Securities
Information Processors (‘‘SIPs’’) 4 data,
and other non-exchange services.5 The
Exchange will offer this service to
customers in both 10 GB Ultra and 1 GB
Ultra connections. The installation fee
for both 10 GB Ultra and 1 GB Ultra
direct connections will be $1,500.
Meanwhile, the monthly fee will be
$5,000 for 10 GB Ultra connections and
$2,000 for 1 GB Ultra connections. For
1 GB Ultra or 10 GB Ultra connections
for UTP only, the installation fee and
monthly fee will be waived for the first
two connections and thereafter the
installation fee will be $100 and the
monthly fee also will be $100. As with
Direct Circuit Connectivity, the
Exchange proposes to charge a $925 fee
to customers that choose to install a
cable router in its data center for
purposes of receiving the third party
services as well as a monthly fee of $150
for customers that choose to install
equipment in the Exchange’s data center
to support that connectivity.
3 Clients will not be permitted to install routers
in or rent cabinet space directly from the Exchange
at the POPs. Accordingly, the fee schedule for POP
connectivity will not include fees for these services.
4 The SIPs link the U.S. markets by processing
and consolidating all protected bid/ask quotes and
trades from every registered exchange trading venue
and FINRA into a single data feed, and they
disseminate and calculate critical regulatory
information, including the National Best Bid and
Offer, Limit Up Limit Down price bands, short sale
restrictions and regulatory halts.
5 Third Party Services includes not only SIP data
feeds, but also data feeds from other exchanges and
markets. For example, Third Party Connectivity will
support connectivity to the FINRA/Nasdaq Trade
Reporting Facility, BATS Depth Feeds, and NYSE
Feeds. A customer must separately subscribe to the
third party services to which it connects with a
Third Party Connectivity subscription. The
Exchange notes that customers that do not wish to
subscribe to Direct Circuit Connectivity to Third
Party Services may alternatively connect through an
extranet provider or a market data redistributor.
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Furthermore, the Exchange proposes
to offer connectivity to its Test Facility.
The Test Facility provides subscribers
with a virtual system test environment
that closely approximates the
production environment and on which
they may test their automated systems
that integrate with the Exchange. For
example, subscribers may test upcoming
Exchange releases and product
enhancements, as well as test software
prior to implementation. The Exchange
proposes to assess certain fees for use of
the Test Facility. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes that subscribers to
the Test Facility located in Carteret,
New Jersey shall pay a fee of $1,000 per
hand-off, per month for connection to
the Test Facility. The hand-off fee will
includes [sic] either a 1 GB or 10 GB
switch port and a cross connect to the
Test Facility. Subscribers will also pay
a one-time installation fee of $1,000 per
handoff.
Finally, for each of the connectivity
options discussed above, the Exchange
proposes to include language in the fee
schedule which states that connectivity
to the Exchange also applies to
connectivity to all of the other Nasdaq,
Inc. markets, including Nasdaq, BX,
Phlx, ISE, and GEMX. This purpose of
this proposal is to specify that a client
can use the connections it establishes
and maintains to connect, not only to
the Exchange, but also to any or all of
its sister exchanges, and in doing so, it
will be billed only once.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,6 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,7
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes that proposed
new connectivity fees are reasonable as
a means of covering its costs associated
with providing new connectivity
options. Moreover, these new fees are
reasonable because they are similar to or
the same as the connectivity fees that
the Exchange’s sister exchanges,
including Nasdaq, BX, and Phlx, charge
under their respective rules.8 They are
6 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
8 See Nasdaq Rule 7030, BX Rule 7030, and
Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule Section VII.E
(Test Facility); Nasdaq Rule 7034(b), BX Rule
7034(b), and Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule
Section X (co-location); Nasdaq Rule 7051, BX Rule
7 15
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
also the same as those connectivity fees
that GEMX and ISE are proposing to
assess in filings being submitted to the
Commission concurrently with this one.
The Exchange also believes that it is
reasonable and in the interest of the
public and investors to harmonize all of
the Exchange’s connectivity options and
connectivity fees now that all of the
Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges are on a
common platform.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed new fees are an equitable
allocation and are not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
will apply the same fees to all
subscribers to the same connectivity
options.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. In terms of
inter-market competition, the Exchange
notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or
rebate opportunities available at other
venues to be more favorable. In such an
environment, the Exchange must
continually adjust its fees to remain
competitive with other exchanges and
with alternative trading systems that
have been exempted from compliance
with the statutory standards applicable
to exchanges. Because competitors are
free to modify their own fees in
response, and because market
participants may connect to third
parties instead of directly connecting to
the Exchange, the Exchange believes
that the degree to which fee changes in
this market may impose any burden on
competition is extremely limited.
In this instance, the proposed changes
to the charges assessed for connectivity
to the Exchange are consistent with the
fees assessed by other exchanges for the
same or similar connectivity. Moreover,
the Exchange must assess fees to cover
the costs incurred in providing
connectivity and members had been
assessed fees for Exchange connectivity
prior to the sunset of the old Exchange
architecture. As a consequence,
competition will not be burdened by the
proposed fees. In sum, if the changes
proposed herein are unattractive to
market participants, it is likely that the
Exchange will lose market share as a
result. Accordingly, the Exchange does
7051, and Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule
Section XI (direct connectivity).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:06 Oct 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
not believe that the proposed changes
will impair the ability of members or
competing order execution venues to
maintain their competitive standing in
the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 9 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.10
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 11 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 12 permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time
if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. The Exchange has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. The Exchange states that the
proposed rule change does not
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest because
it will eliminate obsolete connectivity
services and replace them with services
that customers will need to connect to
the Exchange via its new trading
platform. The Exchange further states
that such connectivity services will be
similar, or the same, as those that are
currently offered by other Nasdaq, Inc.
exchanges. Moreover, the Exchange
states that the fees for such connectivity
that are similar to, or the same, as fees
charged by the other Nasdaq, Inc.
exchanges.
The Commission believes that waiver
of the 30-day operative delay is
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
10 17
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49449
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Commission notes that the proposal
harmonizes the Exchange’s co-location
offerings and fees with those of the
other Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges.
Furthermore, waiver of the 30-day
operative delay will eliminate the
confusion that could occur if different
co-location offerings were available on
each of Nasdaq, Inc.’s affiliated
exchanges. Accordingly, the
Commission hereby waives the 30-day
operative delay and designates the
proposed rule change as operative upon
filing.13
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MRX–2017–21 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MRX–2017–21. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
13 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
49450
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MRX–2017–21 and should
be submitted on or before November 15,
2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–23120 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–81903; File No. SR–ISE–
2017–91]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange’s Schedule of Fees
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
October 19, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
5, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:06 Oct 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
14 17
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to: (i) Delete
fees and descriptions thereof for
connectivity no longer used by the
Exchange; and (ii) add new fees for colocation services, direct circuit
connections to the Exchange, direct
circuit connections to third party
services, point of presence (‘‘POP’’)
connectivity, and connectivity to the
Exchange’s Test Facility (the ‘‘Test
Facility’’).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at www.ise.com, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fee Schedule to eliminate certain fees
associated with legacy options for
connecting to ISE and to replace them
with fees associated with new options
for connecting to the Exchange that are
similar to those that ISE’s sister
exchanges presently offer.
ISE is engaged in an initiative to
migrate the Exchange’s trading system
to the Nasdaq INET architecture. As part
of that initiative, ISE proposes to retire
certain obsolete connectivity associated
with the Exchange’s legacy trading
system and the fees associated with
such connectivity.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
discontinue offering Ethernet
connectivity to the Exchange and also
eliminate the fees it charges for such
connectivity in Section VI.B of its Fee
Schedule, entitled ‘‘Network Fees.’’ The
Exchange currently offers four Ethernet
connection options: A 1 Gb connection
at a cost of $1,000 per month, a 10 Gb
connection at a cost of $4,500 per
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
month, a 10 Gb low latency connection
at a cost of $8,000 per month, and a 40
Gb low latency connection at a cost of
$15,000 per month.
Additionally, the Exchange proposes
to stop offering customers the ability to
connect to the Exchange via an
Application Programming Interface
(‘‘API’’) session or a Financial
Information eXchange (‘‘FIX’’) session,
as these connection options are
becoming obsolete with respect to the
new trading system. The Exchange
correspondingly proposes to eliminate
entirely Section V.C of its Fee Schedule,
entitled ‘‘FIX Session/Session Fees.’’
The Exchange presently charges Market
Makers monthly per API fees that
depend upon the functionality of API
and, if used for quoting, the amount of
usage per day per user. The Exchange
also charges Electronic Access Members
monthly API and FIX fees based upon
the number of sessions.
In lieu of the above, the Exchange
proposes to offer customers various new
options to connect to the Exchange and
to assess fees for such connectivity. The
connectivity options that the Exchange
proposes to offer—colocation, direct
circuit connectivity, connectivity to
third party services, POP connectivity,
and connectivity to the Exchange’s Test
Facility—and the fees that the Exchange
proposes to assess for such connectivity
are similar to those that ISE’s affiliated
Nasdaq, Inc. markets—including The
NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’), Nasdaq BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’),
and Nasdaq Phlx LLC (‘‘Phlx’’)—
presently offer and assess to their
customers under their respective rules.
They are also the same as the
connectivity options and fees that
Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’) and
Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’) propose to
offer and assess under their respective
rules in tandem with this filing. This
proposal, in other words, seeks to
harmonize the Exchange’s connectivity
offerings and fees with those of its sister
exchanges.
The first new connectivity option that
the Exchange proposes to offer its
customers is co-location. Co-location is
a suite of hardware, power,
telecommunication, and other ancillary
products and services that allow market
participants and vendors to place their
trading and communications equipment
in close physical proximity to the
quoting and execution facilities of the
Exchange and other Nasdaq, Inc.
markets. The Exchange provides colocation services and imposes fees
through Nasdaq Technology Services
LLC and pursuant to agreements with
the owner/operator of its data center
where both the Exchange’s quoting and
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49447-49450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23120]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-81907; File No. SR-MRX-2017-21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange's Schedule of Fees
October 19, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 5, 2017, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees to add new fees
for co-location services, direct circuit connections to the Exchange,
connections to third party services, point of presence (``POP'')
connectivity, and connectivity to the Exchange's Test Facility (the
``Test Facility'').
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to eliminate
certain fees associated with legacy options for connecting to ISE and
to replace them with fees associated with new options for connecting to
the Exchange that are similar to those that MRX's sister exchanges
presently offer.
The Exchange is engaged in an initiative to migrate the Exchange's
trading system to the Nasdaq INET architecture. As part of that
initiative, the Exchange proposes to offer customers various new
options to connect to the Exchange and to assess fees for such
connectivity. The connectivity options that the Exchange proposes to
offer--colocation, direct circuit connectivity, connectivity to third
party services, POP connectivity, and connectivity to the Exchange's
Test Facility--and the fees that the Exchange proposes to assess for
such connectivity are similar to those that the Exchange's affiliated
Nasdaq, Inc. markets--including The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC
(``Nasdaq''), Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX''), and Nasdaq Phlx LLC
(``Phlx'')--presently offer and assess to their customers under their
respective rules. They are also the same as the connectivity options
and fees that Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'') and Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'')
propose to offer and assess under their respective rules in tandem with
this filing. This proposal, in other words, seeks to harmonize the
Exchange's connectivity offerings and fees with those of its sister
exchanges.
The first new connectivity option that the Exchange proposes to
offer its customers is co-location. Co-location is a suite of hardware,
power, telecommunication, and other ancillary products and services
that allow market participants and vendors to place their trading and
communications equipment in close physical proximity to the quoting and
execution facilities of the Exchange and other Nasdaq, Inc. markets.
The Exchange provides co-location services and imposes fees through
Nasdaq Technology Services LLC and pursuant to agreements with the
owner/operator of its data center where both the Exchange's quoting and
trading facilities and co-located customer equipment are housed. Users
of colocation services include private extranet providers, data
vendors, as well as Exchange members and non-
[[Page 49448]]
members. The use of co-location services is entirely voluntary.
Like its sister exchanges, and as detailed in the proposed co-
location fee schedule, the Exchange proposes to impose a uniform, non-
discriminatory set of fees for various co-location services, including:
Fees for co-located connections to the Exchange and to third party
services (described below) in various bandwidths; fees for cabinet
space usage, or options for future space usage; installation and
related power provision for hosted equipment; connectivity among
multiple cabinets being used by the same customer as well as customer
connectivity to the Exchange and telecommunications providers; and
related maintenance and consulting services. Fees related to cabinet
and power usage are incremental, with additional charges being imposed
based on higher levels of cabinet and/or power usage, the use of non-
standard cabinet sizes or special cabinet cooling equipment, or the re-
selling of cabinet space.
In addition to co-location services, the Exchange proposes to offer
several other connectivity options for customers that are located
outside of the Exchange's primary data center in Carteret, New Jersey.
First, the Exchange proposes to offer a ``Direct Circuit
Connectivity'' service, whereby subscribers may connect their
facilities directly to the Exchange's primary data center using a
circuit they obtain from an external telecommunications provider. For
this form of connectivity, the Exchange's proposal offers customers the
choice of 1 GB, 1 GB Ultra, and 10 GB connections. The installation fee
for all such connections will be $1,500 and the monthly fee will be
$7,500 for 10 GB connections and $2,500 for both 1 GB and 1 GB
connections. The Exchange also proposes to charge a fee to customers
that choose to install a cable router in its data center and a monthly
fee for customers that choose to install equipment in the Exchange's
data center to support the connectivity. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes an installation fee of $925 per router, switch or modem, and a
monthly fee of $150 to rent cabinet space based on a unit height of
approximately 1.75 inches (commonly called a ``U'' space) and a maximum
power of 125 Watts per U space.
Next, the Exchange proposes to offer a ``POP Connectivity''
service, whereby subscribers may use external telecommunication
circuits to connect directly to one or more of the Exchange's satellite
data centers (each, a ``POP'') that are located in places other than
Carteret. Each POP, in turn, has a fully redundant connection to the
Exchange's primary data center, such that subscribers may connect to
the primary data center through its connection to a POP. For POP
Connectivity to the Exchange, the Exchange proposes to offer 1 GB Ultra
and 10 GB Ultra connections. The installation fee for all such
connections will be $1,500 and the monthly fee will be $7,500 for 10 GB
connections and $2,500 for 1 GB Ultra connections.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Clients will not be permitted to install routers in or rent
cabinet space directly from the Exchange at the POPs. Accordingly,
the fee schedule for POP connectivity will not include fees for
these services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to offer connectivity to third
party services. The Exchange is proposing to offer this service to both
non-co-location customers (via a direct circuit connection) and co-
location customers alike. This connectivity will enable customers to
receive third party market data feeds, including Securities Information
Processors (``SIPs'') \4\ data, and other non-exchange services.\5\ The
Exchange will offer this service to customers in both 10 GB Ultra and 1
GB Ultra connections. The installation fee for both 10 GB Ultra and 1
GB Ultra direct connections will be $1,500. Meanwhile, the monthly fee
will be $5,000 for 10 GB Ultra connections and $2,000 for 1 GB Ultra
connections. For 1 GB Ultra or 10 GB Ultra connections for UTP only,
the installation fee and monthly fee will be waived for the first two
connections and thereafter the installation fee will be $100 and the
monthly fee also will be $100. As with Direct Circuit Connectivity, the
Exchange proposes to charge a $925 fee to customers that choose to
install a cable router in its data center for purposes of receiving the
third party services as well as a monthly fee of $150 for customers
that choose to install equipment in the Exchange's data center to
support that connectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The SIPs link the U.S. markets by processing and
consolidating all protected bid/ask quotes and trades from every
registered exchange trading venue and FINRA into a single data feed,
and they disseminate and calculate critical regulatory information,
including the National Best Bid and Offer, Limit Up Limit Down price
bands, short sale restrictions and regulatory halts.
\5\ Third Party Services includes not only SIP data feeds, but
also data feeds from other exchanges and markets. For example, Third
Party Connectivity will support connectivity to the FINRA/Nasdaq
Trade Reporting Facility, BATS Depth Feeds, and NYSE Feeds. A
customer must separately subscribe to the third party services to
which it connects with a Third Party Connectivity subscription. The
Exchange notes that customers that do not wish to subscribe to
Direct Circuit Connectivity to Third Party Services may
alternatively connect through an extranet provider or a market data
redistributor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, the Exchange proposes to offer connectivity to its
Test Facility. The Test Facility provides subscribers with a virtual
system test environment that closely approximates the production
environment and on which they may test their automated systems that
integrate with the Exchange. For example, subscribers may test upcoming
Exchange releases and product enhancements, as well as test software
prior to implementation. The Exchange proposes to assess certain fees
for use of the Test Facility. Specifically, the Exchange proposes that
subscribers to the Test Facility located in Carteret, New Jersey shall
pay a fee of $1,000 per hand-off, per month for connection to the Test
Facility. The hand-off fee will includes [sic] either a 1 GB or 10 GB
switch port and a cross connect to the Test Facility. Subscribers will
also pay a one-time installation fee of $1,000 per handoff.
Finally, for each of the connectivity options discussed above, the
Exchange proposes to include language in the fee schedule which states
that connectivity to the Exchange also applies to connectivity to all
of the other Nasdaq, Inc. markets, including Nasdaq, BX, Phlx, ISE, and
GEMX. This purpose of this proposal is to specify that a client can use
the connections it establishes and maintains to connect, not only to
the Exchange, but also to any or all of its sister exchanges, and in
doing so, it will be billed only once.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that proposed new connectivity fees are
reasonable as a means of covering its costs associated with providing
new connectivity options. Moreover, these new fees are reasonable
because they are similar to or the same as the connectivity fees that
the Exchange's sister exchanges, including Nasdaq, BX, and Phlx, charge
under their respective rules.\8\ They are
[[Page 49449]]
also the same as those connectivity fees that GEMX and ISE are
proposing to assess in filings being submitted to the Commission
concurrently with this one. The Exchange also believes that it is
reasonable and in the interest of the public and investors to harmonize
all of the Exchange's connectivity options and connectivity fees now
that all of the Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges are on a common platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Nasdaq Rule 7030, BX Rule 7030, and Nasdaq Phlx LLC
Pricing Schedule Section VII.E (Test Facility); Nasdaq Rule 7034(b),
BX Rule 7034(b), and Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule Section X (co-
location); Nasdaq Rule 7051, BX Rule 7051, and Nasdaq Phlx LLC
Pricing Schedule Section XI (direct connectivity).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed new fees are an equitable
allocation and are not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange
will apply the same fees to all subscribers to the same connectivity
options.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of inter-market
competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust
its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with
alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance
with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because
competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because
market participants may connect to third parties instead of directly
connecting to the Exchange, the Exchange believes that the degree to
which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition
is extremely limited.
In this instance, the proposed changes to the charges assessed for
connectivity to the Exchange are consistent with the fees assessed by
other exchanges for the same or similar connectivity. Moreover, the
Exchange must assess fees to cover the costs incurred in providing
connectivity and members had been assessed fees for Exchange
connectivity prior to the sunset of the old Exchange architecture. As a
consequence, competition will not be burdened by the proposed fees. In
sum, if the changes proposed herein are unattractive to market
participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as
a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed
changes will impair the ability of members or competing order execution
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \9\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \12\ permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange states that
the proposed rule change does not significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest because it will eliminate obsolete
connectivity services and replace them with services that customers
will need to connect to the Exchange via its new trading platform. The
Exchange further states that such connectivity services will be
similar, or the same, as those that are currently offered by other
Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges. Moreover, the Exchange states that the fees for
such connectivity that are similar to, or the same, as fees charged by
the other Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
The Commission notes that the proposal harmonizes the Exchange's co-
location offerings and fees with those of the other Nasdaq, Inc.
exchanges. Furthermore, waiver of the 30-day operative delay will
eliminate the confusion that could occur if different co-location
offerings were available on each of Nasdaq, Inc.'s affiliated
exchanges. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day
operative delay and designates the proposed rule change as operative
upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-MRX-2017-21 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2017-21. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements
[[Page 49450]]
with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2017-21 and should be submitted on
or before November 15, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23120 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P