Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Schedule of Fees, 49453-49456 [2017-23117]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices All submissions should refer to File Number SR–ISE–2017–91. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–ISE–2017–91 and should be submitted on or before November 15, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.14 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017–23118 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am] SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–81902; File No. SR–GEMX– 2017–48] sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange’s Schedule of Fees October 19, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:06 Oct 24, 2017 Jkt 244001 I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to: (i) Delete fees and descriptions thereof for connectivity no longer used by the Exchange; and (ii) add new fees for colocation services, direct circuit connections to the Exchange, connections to third party services, point of presence (‘‘POP’’) connectivity, and connectivity to the Exchange’s Test Facility (the ‘‘Test Facility’’). The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 14 17 notice is hereby given that on October 16, 2017, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to eliminate certain fees associated with legacy options for connecting to GEMX and to replace them with fees associated with new options for connecting to the Exchange that are similar to those that GEMX’s sister exchanges presently offer. GEMX is engaged in an initiative to migrate the Exchange’s trading system to the Nasdaq INET architecture. As part of that initiative, GEMX proposes to retire certain obsolete connectivity associated with the Exchange’s legacy trading system and the fees associated with such connectivity. PO 00000 Frm 00143 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 49453 Specifically, the Exchange proposes to discontinue offering Ethernet connectivity to the Exchange and also eliminate the fees it charges for such connectivity in Section IV.C of its Fee Schedule, entitled ‘‘Network Fees.’’ 3 The Exchange currently offers four Ethernet connection options: A 1 Gb connection at a cost of $1,000 per month, a 10 Gb connection at a cost of $4,500 per month, a 10 Gb low latency connection at a cost of $8,000 per month, and a 40 Gb low latency connection at a cost of $15,000 per month. Additionally, the Exchange proposes to stop offering customers the ability to connect to the Exchange via an Application Programming Interface (‘‘API’’) session or a Financial Information eXchange (‘‘FIX’’) session, as these connection options are becoming obsolete with respect to the new trading system. The Exchange correspondingly proposes to eliminate paragraphs 1 and 2 of Section IV.E of its Fee Schedule, entitled ‘‘Port Fees.’’ The Exchange presently charges Electronic Access Members (‘‘EAMs’’) monthly per session API fees and FIX session fees. In lieu of the above, the Exchange proposes to offer customers various new options to connect to the Exchange and to assess fees for such connectivity. The connectivity options that the Exchange proposes to offer—colocation, direct circuit connectivity, connectivity to third party services, POP connectivity, and connectivity to the Exchange’s Test Facility—and the fees that the Exchange proposes to assess for such connectivity are similar to those that ISE’s affiliated Nasdaq, Inc. markets—including The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’), Nasdaq BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’), and Nasdaq Phlx LLC (‘‘Phlx’’)— presently offer and assess to their customers under their respective rules. They are also the same as the connectivity options and fees that Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’) and Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’) propose to offer and assess under their respective rules in tandem with this filing. This proposal, in other words, seeks to harmonize the Exchange’s connectivity offerings and fees with those of its sister exchanges. The first new connectivity option that the Exchange proposes to offer its customers is co-location. Co-location is a suite of hardware, power, telecommunication, and other ancillary products and services that allow market participants and vendors to place their trading and communications equipment 3 The Exchange proposes to change the title of Section IV from ‘‘Access Services’’ to ‘‘Connectivity Fees.’’ E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 49454 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices in close physical proximity to the quoting and execution facilities of the Exchange and other Nasdaq, Inc. markets. The Exchange provides colocation services and imposes fees through Nasdaq Technology Services LLC and pursuant to agreements with the owner/operator of its data center where both the Exchange’s quoting and trading facilities and co-located customer equipment are housed. Users of colocation services include private extranet providers, data vendors, as well as Exchange members and nonmembers. The use of co-location services is entirely voluntary. Like its sister exchanges, and as detailed in the proposed co-location fee schedule, the Exchange proposes to impose a uniform, non-discriminatory set of fees for various co-location services, including: fees for co-located connections to the Exchange and to third party services (described below) in various bandwidths; fees for cabinet space usage, or options for future space usage; installation and related power provision for hosted equipment; connectivity among multiple cabinets being used by the same customer as well as customer connectivity to the Exchange and telecommunications providers; and related maintenance and consulting services. Fees related to cabinet and power usage are incremental, with additional charges being imposed based on higher levels of cabinet and/or power usage, the use of non-standard cabinet sizes or special cabinet cooling equipment, or the reselling of cabinet space. In addition to co-location services, the Exchange proposes to offer several other connectivity options for customers that are located outside of the Exchange’s primary data center in Carteret, New Jersey. First, the Exchange proposes to offer a ‘‘Direct Circuit Connectivity’’ service, whereby subscribers may connect their facilities directly to the Exchange’s primary data center using a circuit they obtain from an external telecommunications provider. For this form of connectivity, the Exchange’s proposal offers customers the choice of 1 GB, 1 GB Ultra, and 10 GB connections. The installation fee for all such connections will be $1,500 and the monthly fee will be $7,500 for 10 GB connections and $2,500 for both 1 GB and 1 GB Ultra connections. The Exchange also proposes to charge a fee to customers that choose to install a cable router in its data center and a monthly fee for customers that choose to install equipment in the Exchange’s data center to support the connectivity. Specifically, the Exchange proposes an VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:06 Oct 24, 2017 Jkt 244001 installation fee of $925 per router, switch or modem, and a monthly fee of $150 to rent cabinet space based on a unit height of approximately 1.75 inches (commonly called a ‘‘U’’ space) and a maximum power of 125 Watts per U space. Next, the Exchange proposes to offer a ‘‘POP Connectivity’’ service, whereby subscribers may use external telecommunication circuits to connect directly to one or more of the Exchange’s satellite data centers (each, a ‘‘POP’’) that are located in places other than Carteret. Each POP, in turn, has a fully redundant connection to the Exchange’s primary data center, such that subscribers may connect to the primary data center through its connection to a POP. For POP Connectivity to the Exchange, the Exchange proposes to offer 1 GB Ultra and 10 GB connections. The installation fee for all such connections will be $1,500 and the monthly fee will be $7,500 for 10 GB connections and $2,500 for 1 GB Ultra connections.4 Additionally, the Exchange proposes to offer connectivity to third party services. The Exchange is proposing to offer this service to both non-co-location customers (via a direct circuit connection) and co-location customers alike. This connectivity will enable customers to receive third party market data feeds, including Securities Information Processors (‘‘SIPs’’) 5 data, and other non-exchange services.6 The Exchange will offer this service to customers in both 10 GB Ultra and 1 GB Ultra bandwidths. The installation fee for both 10 GB Ultra and 1 GB Ultra direct connections will be $1,500. Meanwhile, the monthly fee will be $5,000 for 10 GB Ultra connections and $2,000 for 1 GB Ultra hand-offs. For 1 GB Ultra or 10 GB Ultra connections for UTP only, the installation fee and 4 Clients will not be permitted to install routers in or rent cabinet space directly from the Exchange at the POPs. Accordingly, the fee schedule for POP connectivity will not include fees for these services. 5 The SIPs link the U.S. markets by processing and consolidating all protected bid/ask quotes and trades from every registered exchange trading venue and FINRA into a single data feed, and they disseminate and calculate critical regulatory information, including the National Best Bid and Offer, Limit Up Limit Down price bands, short sale restrictions and regulatory halts. 6 Third Party Services includes not only SIP data feeds, but also data feeds from other exchanges and markets. For example, Third Party Connectivity will support connectivity to the FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility, BATS Depth Feeds, and NYSE Feeds. A customer must separately subscribe to the third party services to which it connects with a Third Party Connectivity subscription. The Exchange notes that customers that do not wish to subscribe to Direct Circuit Connectivity to Third Party Services may alternatively connect through an extranet provider or a market data redistributor. PO 00000 Frm 00144 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 monthly fee will be waived for the first two connections and thereafter the installation fee will be $100 and the monthly fee also will be $100. As with Direct Circuit Connectivity, the Exchange proposes to charge a $925 fee to customers that choose to install a cable router in its data center for purposes of receiving the third party services as well as a monthly fee of $150 for customers that choose to install equipment in the Exchange’s data center to support that connectivity. Furthermore, the Exchange proposes to offer connectivity to its Test Facility. The Test Facility provides subscribers with a virtual system test environment that closely approximates the production environment and on which they may test their automated systems that integrate with the Exchange. For example, subscribers may test upcoming Exchange releases and product enhancements, as well as test software prior to implementation. The Exchange proposes to assess certain fees for use of the Test Facility. Specifically, the Exchange proposes that subscribers to the Test Facility located in Carteret, New Jersey shall pay a fee of $1,000 per hand-off, per month for connection to the Test Facility. The hand-off fee will includes [sic] either a 1 GB or 10 GB switch port and a cross connect to the Test Facility. Subscribers will also pay a one-time installation fee of $1,000 per handoff. Finally, for each of the connectivity options discussed above, the Exchange proposes to include language in the fee schedule which states that connectivity to the Exchange also applies to connectivity to all of the other Nasdaq, Inc. markets, including Nasdaq, BX, Phlx, MRX, and ISE. This purpose of this proposal is to specify that a client can use the connections it establishes and maintains to connect, not only to the Exchange, but also to any or all of its sister exchanges, and in doing so, it will be billed only once. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,7 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,8 in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to eliminate its existing 7 15 8 15 E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 25OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Ethernet, FIX, and API connectivity offerings and their associated fees as the Exchange is migrating to a new platform that will offer new connectivity options. The Exchange notes that its customers have had ample prior notice of this transition. The Exchange believes that proposed new connectivity fees are reasonable as a means of covering its costs associated with providing new connectivity options. Moreover, these new fees are reasonable because they are similar to or the same as the connectivity fees that the Exchange’s sister exchanges, including Nasdaq, BX, and Phlx, charge under their respective rules.9 They are also the same as those connectivity fees that ISE and MRX are proposing to assess in filings being submitted to the Commission concurrently with this one. The Exchange also believes that it is reasonable and in the interest of the public and investors to harmonize all of the Exchange’s connectivity options and connectivity fees now that all of the Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges are on a common platform. The Exchange believes that the proposed new fees are an equitable allocation and are not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange will apply the same fees to all subscribers to the same connectivity options. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because market participants may connect to third parties instead of directly connecting to 9 See Nasdaq Rule 7030, BX Rule 7030, and Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule Section VII.E (Test Facility); Nasdaq Rule 7034(b), BX Rule 7034(b), and Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule Section X (co-location); Nasdaq Rule 7051, BX Rule 7051, and Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule Section XI (direct connectivity). VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:06 Oct 24, 2017 Jkt 244001 the Exchange, the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited. In this instance, the proposed changes to the charges assessed for connectivity to the Exchange are consistent with the fees assessed by other exchanges for the same or similar connectivity. Moreover, the Exchange must assess fees to cover the costs incurred in providing connectivity and members had been assessed fees for Exchange connectivity prior to the sunset of the old Exchange architecture. As a consequence, competition will not be burdened by the proposed fees. In sum, if the changes proposed herein are unattractive to market participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes will impair the ability of members or competing order execution venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 10 and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4 thereunder.11 A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 12 normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 13 permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day 10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. 12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 11 17 PO 00000 Frm 00145 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 49455 operative delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange states that the proposed rule change does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest because it will eliminate obsolete connectivity services and replace them with services that customers will need to connect to the Exchange via its new trading platform. The Exchange further states that such connectivity services will be similar, or the same, as those that are currently offered by other Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges. Moreover, the Exchange states that the fees for such connectivity that are similar to, or the same, as fees charged by the other Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges. The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Commission notes that the proposal harmonizes the Exchange’s co-location offerings and fees with those of the other Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges. Furthermore, waiver of the 30-day operative delay will eliminate the confusion that could occur if different co-location offerings were available on each of Nasdaq. Inc.’s affiliated exchanges. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing.14 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or 14 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 49456 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– GEMX–2017–48 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–GEMX–2017–48. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–GEMX–2017–48 and should be submitted on or before November 15, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.15 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES [FR Doc. 2017–23117 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–81909; File No. SR–OCC– 2017–005] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Related to a Comprehensive Risk Management Framework October 19, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on October 10, 2017, The Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by OCC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change This purpose of the proposed rule change is to adopt a comprehensive Risk Management Framework Policy, which would describe OCC’s framework for comprehensive risk management, including OCC’s framework to identify, measure, monitor, and manage all risks faced by OCC in the provision of clearing, settlement and risk management services. The Risk Management Framework Policy is included in confidential Exhibit 5 of the filing. The proposed rule change does not require any changes to the text of OCC’s By-Laws or Rules. All terms with initial capitalization that are not otherwise defined herein have the same meaning as set forth in the OCC ByLaws and Rules.3 II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, OCC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. OCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these statements. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 OCC’s By-Laws and Rules can be found on OCC’s public Web site: http://optionsclearing.com/ about/publications/bylaws.jsp. 2 17 15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:06 Oct 24, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00146 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change (1) Purpose Background On September 28, 2016, the Commission adopted amendments to Rule 17Ad–22 4 and added new Rule 17Ab2–2 5 pursuant to Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) 6 and the Payment, Clearing and Settlement Supervision Act of 2010 (‘‘Clearing Supervision Act’’) 7 to establish enhanced standards for the operation and governance of those clearing agencies registered with the Commission that meet the definition of a ‘‘covered clearing agency,’’ as defined by Rule 17Ad–22(a)(5) 8 (collectively, the new and amended rules are herein referred to as ‘‘CCA’’ rules). The CCA rules require that covered clearing agencies, among other things: ‘‘[E]stablish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to . . . [m]aintain a sound risk management framework for comprehensively managing legal, credit, liquidity, operational, general business, investment, custody, and other risks that arise in or are borne by the covered clearing agency, which . . . [i]ncludes risk management policies, procedures, and systems designed to identify, measure, monitor, and manage the range of risks that arise in or are borne by the covered clearing agency, that are subject to review on a specified periodic basis and approved by the board of directors annually . . .’’ 9 OCC is defined as a covered clearing agency under the CCA rules, and therefore is subject to the requirements of the CCA rules, including Rule 17Ad– 22(e)(3).10 Accordingly, OCC proposes to adopt a Risk Management Framework Policy (‘‘RMF’’), as described below, to formalize and update its overall framework for comprehensively managing the Key Risks 11 that arise in or are borne by OCC to promote compliance with Rule 17Ad–22(e)(3).12 Proposed Policy OCC proposes to adopt a new RMF document. The purpose of the RMF is to describe OCC’s framework for 4 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22. CFR 240.17Ab2–2. 6 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. 7 12 U.S.C. 5461 et seq. 8 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(a)(5). 9 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(3). 10 Id. 11 Under the proposed RMF, ‘‘Key Risks’’ would be defined as risks that are related to the foundational aspects of CCP clearing, settlement and risk management services. 12 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(3). 5 17 E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49453-49456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81902; File No. SR-GEMX-2017-48]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 
Exchange's Schedule of Fees

October 19, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on October 16, 2017, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') 
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to: (i) Delete fees and descriptions thereof 
for connectivity no longer used by the Exchange; and (ii) add new fees 
for co-location services, direct circuit connections to the Exchange, 
connections to third party services, point of presence (``POP'') 
connectivity, and connectivity to the Exchange's Test Facility (the 
``Test Facility'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to eliminate 
certain fees associated with legacy options for connecting to GEMX and 
to replace them with fees associated with new options for connecting to 
the Exchange that are similar to those that GEMX's sister exchanges 
presently offer.
    GEMX is engaged in an initiative to migrate the Exchange's trading 
system to the Nasdaq INET architecture. As part of that initiative, 
GEMX proposes to retire certain obsolete connectivity associated with 
the Exchange's legacy trading system and the fees associated with such 
connectivity.
    Specifically, the Exchange proposes to discontinue offering 
Ethernet connectivity to the Exchange and also eliminate the fees it 
charges for such connectivity in Section IV.C of its Fee Schedule, 
entitled ``Network Fees.'' \3\ The Exchange currently offers four 
Ethernet connection options: A 1 Gb connection at a cost of $1,000 per 
month, a 10 Gb connection at a cost of $4,500 per month, a 10 Gb low 
latency connection at a cost of $8,000 per month, and a 40 Gb low 
latency connection at a cost of $15,000 per month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange proposes to change the title of Section IV from 
``Access Services'' to ``Connectivity Fees.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Exchange proposes to stop offering customers the 
ability to connect to the Exchange via an Application Programming 
Interface (``API'') session or a Financial Information eXchange 
(``FIX'') session, as these connection options are becoming obsolete 
with respect to the new trading system. The Exchange correspondingly 
proposes to eliminate paragraphs 1 and 2 of Section IV.E of its Fee 
Schedule, entitled ``Port Fees.'' The Exchange presently charges 
Electronic Access Members (``EAMs'') monthly per session API fees and 
FIX session fees.
    In lieu of the above, the Exchange proposes to offer customers 
various new options to connect to the Exchange and to assess fees for 
such connectivity. The connectivity options that the Exchange proposes 
to offer--colocation, direct circuit connectivity, connectivity to 
third party services, POP connectivity, and connectivity to the 
Exchange's Test Facility--and the fees that the Exchange proposes to 
assess for such connectivity are similar to those that ISE's affiliated 
Nasdaq, Inc. markets--including The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC 
(``Nasdaq''), Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX''), and Nasdaq Phlx LLC 
(``Phlx'')--presently offer and assess to their customers under their 
respective rules. They are also the same as the connectivity options 
and fees that Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'') and Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'') 
propose to offer and assess under their respective rules in tandem with 
this filing. This proposal, in other words, seeks to harmonize the 
Exchange's connectivity offerings and fees with those of its sister 
exchanges.
    The first new connectivity option that the Exchange proposes to 
offer its customers is co-location. Co-location is a suite of hardware, 
power, telecommunication, and other ancillary products and services 
that allow market participants and vendors to place their trading and 
communications equipment

[[Page 49454]]

in close physical proximity to the quoting and execution facilities of 
the Exchange and other Nasdaq, Inc. markets. The Exchange provides co-
location services and imposes fees through Nasdaq Technology Services 
LLC and pursuant to agreements with the owner/operator of its data 
center where both the Exchange's quoting and trading facilities and co-
located customer equipment are housed. Users of colocation services 
include private extranet providers, data vendors, as well as Exchange 
members and non-members. The use of co-location services is entirely 
voluntary.
    Like its sister exchanges, and as detailed in the proposed co-
location fee schedule, the Exchange proposes to impose a uniform, non-
discriminatory set of fees for various co-location services, including: 
fees for co-located connections to the Exchange and to third party 
services (described below) in various bandwidths; fees for cabinet 
space usage, or options for future space usage; installation and 
related power provision for hosted equipment; connectivity among 
multiple cabinets being used by the same customer as well as customer 
connectivity to the Exchange and telecommunications providers; and 
related maintenance and consulting services. Fees related to cabinet 
and power usage are incremental, with additional charges being imposed 
based on higher levels of cabinet and/or power usage, the use of non-
standard cabinet sizes or special cabinet cooling equipment, or the re-
selling of cabinet space.
    In addition to co-location services, the Exchange proposes to offer 
several other connectivity options for customers that are located 
outside of the Exchange's primary data center in Carteret, New Jersey.
    First, the Exchange proposes to offer a ``Direct Circuit 
Connectivity'' service, whereby subscribers may connect their 
facilities directly to the Exchange's primary data center using a 
circuit they obtain from an external telecommunications provider. For 
this form of connectivity, the Exchange's proposal offers customers the 
choice of 1 GB, 1 GB Ultra, and 10 GB connections. The installation fee 
for all such connections will be $1,500 and the monthly fee will be 
$7,500 for 10 GB connections and $2,500 for both 1 GB and 1 GB Ultra 
connections. The Exchange also proposes to charge a fee to customers 
that choose to install a cable router in its data center and a monthly 
fee for customers that choose to install equipment in the Exchange's 
data center to support the connectivity. Specifically, the Exchange 
proposes an installation fee of $925 per router, switch or modem, and a 
monthly fee of $150 to rent cabinet space based on a unit height of 
approximately 1.75 inches (commonly called a ``U'' space) and a maximum 
power of 125 Watts per U space.
    Next, the Exchange proposes to offer a ``POP Connectivity'' 
service, whereby subscribers may use external telecommunication 
circuits to connect directly to one or more of the Exchange's satellite 
data centers (each, a ``POP'') that are located in places other than 
Carteret. Each POP, in turn, has a fully redundant connection to the 
Exchange's primary data center, such that subscribers may connect to 
the primary data center through its connection to a POP. For POP 
Connectivity to the Exchange, the Exchange proposes to offer 1 GB Ultra 
and 10 GB connections. The installation fee for all such connections 
will be $1,500 and the monthly fee will be $7,500 for 10 GB connections 
and $2,500 for 1 GB Ultra connections.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Clients will not be permitted to install routers in or rent 
cabinet space directly from the Exchange at the POPs. Accordingly, 
the fee schedule for POP connectivity will not include fees for 
these services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Exchange proposes to offer connectivity to third 
party services. The Exchange is proposing to offer this service to both 
non-co-location customers (via a direct circuit connection) and co-
location customers alike. This connectivity will enable customers to 
receive third party market data feeds, including Securities Information 
Processors (``SIPs'') \5\ data, and other non-exchange services.\6\ The 
Exchange will offer this service to customers in both 10 GB Ultra and 1 
GB Ultra bandwidths. The installation fee for both 10 GB Ultra and 1 GB 
Ultra direct connections will be $1,500. Meanwhile, the monthly fee 
will be $5,000 for 10 GB Ultra connections and $2,000 for 1 GB Ultra 
hand-offs. For 1 GB Ultra or 10 GB Ultra connections for UTP only, the 
installation fee and monthly fee will be waived for the first two 
connections and thereafter the installation fee will be $100 and the 
monthly fee also will be $100. As with Direct Circuit Connectivity, the 
Exchange proposes to charge a $925 fee to customers that choose to 
install a cable router in its data center for purposes of receiving the 
third party services as well as a monthly fee of $150 for customers 
that choose to install equipment in the Exchange's data center to 
support that connectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The SIPs link the U.S. markets by processing and 
consolidating all protected bid/ask quotes and trades from every 
registered exchange trading venue and FINRA into a single data feed, 
and they disseminate and calculate critical regulatory information, 
including the National Best Bid and Offer, Limit Up Limit Down price 
bands, short sale restrictions and regulatory halts.
    \6\ Third Party Services includes not only SIP data feeds, but 
also data feeds from other exchanges and markets. For example, Third 
Party Connectivity will support connectivity to the FINRA/Nasdaq 
Trade Reporting Facility, BATS Depth Feeds, and NYSE Feeds. A 
customer must separately subscribe to the third party services to 
which it connects with a Third Party Connectivity subscription. The 
Exchange notes that customers that do not wish to subscribe to 
Direct Circuit Connectivity to Third Party Services may 
alternatively connect through an extranet provider or a market data 
redistributor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, the Exchange proposes to offer connectivity to its 
Test Facility. The Test Facility provides subscribers with a virtual 
system test environment that closely approximates the production 
environment and on which they may test their automated systems that 
integrate with the Exchange. For example, subscribers may test upcoming 
Exchange releases and product enhancements, as well as test software 
prior to implementation. The Exchange proposes to assess certain fees 
for use of the Test Facility. Specifically, the Exchange proposes that 
subscribers to the Test Facility located in Carteret, New Jersey shall 
pay a fee of $1,000 per hand-off, per month for connection to the Test 
Facility. The hand-off fee will includes [sic] either a 1 GB or 10 GB 
switch port and a cross connect to the Test Facility. Subscribers will 
also pay a one-time installation fee of $1,000 per handoff.
    Finally, for each of the connectivity options discussed above, the 
Exchange proposes to include language in the fee schedule which states 
that connectivity to the Exchange also applies to connectivity to all 
of the other Nasdaq, Inc. markets, including Nasdaq, BX, Phlx, MRX, and 
ISE. This purpose of this proposal is to specify that a client can use 
the connections it establishes and maintains to connect, not only to 
the Exchange, but also to any or all of its sister exchanges, and in 
doing so, it will be billed only once.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote 
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to eliminate its 
existing

[[Page 49455]]

Ethernet, FIX, and API connectivity offerings and their associated fees 
as the Exchange is migrating to a new platform that will offer new 
connectivity options. The Exchange notes that its customers have had 
ample prior notice of this transition.
    The Exchange believes that proposed new connectivity fees are 
reasonable as a means of covering its costs associated with providing 
new connectivity options. Moreover, these new fees are reasonable 
because they are similar to or the same as the connectivity fees that 
the Exchange's sister exchanges, including Nasdaq, BX, and Phlx, charge 
under their respective rules.\9\ They are also the same as those 
connectivity fees that ISE and MRX are proposing to assess in filings 
being submitted to the Commission concurrently with this one. The 
Exchange also believes that it is reasonable and in the interest of the 
public and investors to harmonize all of the Exchange's connectivity 
options and connectivity fees now that all of the Nasdaq, Inc. 
exchanges are on a common platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Nasdaq Rule 7030, BX Rule 7030, and Nasdaq Phlx LLC 
Pricing Schedule Section VII.E (Test Facility); Nasdaq Rule 7034(b), 
BX Rule 7034(b), and Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule Section X (co-
location); Nasdaq Rule 7051, BX Rule 7051, and Nasdaq Phlx LLC 
Pricing Schedule Section XI (direct connectivity).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed new fees are an equitable 
allocation and are not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange 
will apply the same fees to all subscribers to the same connectivity 
options.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of inter-market 
competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more 
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust 
its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with 
alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance 
with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because 
competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because 
market participants may connect to third parties instead of directly 
connecting to the Exchange, the Exchange believes that the degree to 
which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition 
is extremely limited.
    In this instance, the proposed changes to the charges assessed for 
connectivity to the Exchange are consistent with the fees assessed by 
other exchanges for the same or similar connectivity. Moreover, the 
Exchange must assess fees to cover the costs incurred in providing 
connectivity and members had been assessed fees for Exchange 
connectivity prior to the sunset of the old Exchange architecture. As a 
consequence, competition will not be burdened by the proposed fees. In 
sum, if the changes proposed herein are unattractive to market 
participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as 
a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed 
changes will impair the ability of members or competing order execution 
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \10\ and 
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at 
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed 
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \13\ permits the Commission to 
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked 
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal 
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange states that 
the proposed rule change does not significantly affect the protection 
of investors or the public interest because it will eliminate obsolete 
connectivity services and replace them with services that customers 
will need to connect to the Exchange via its new trading platform. The 
Exchange further states that such connectivity services will be 
similar, or the same, as those that are currently offered by other 
Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges. Moreover, the Exchange states that the fees for 
such connectivity that are similar to, or the same, as fees charged by 
the other Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay 
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. 
The Commission notes that the proposal harmonizes the Exchange's co-
location offerings and fees with those of the other Nasdaq, Inc. 
exchanges. Furthermore, waiver of the 30-day operative delay will 
eliminate the confusion that could occur if different co-location 
offerings were available on each of Nasdaq. Inc.'s affiliated 
exchanges. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day 
operative delay and designates the proposed rule change as operative 
upon filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) 
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the 
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or

[[Page 49456]]

     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-GEMX-2017-48 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-GEMX-2017-48. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting 
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal 
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-GEMX-2017-48 and should be 
submitted on or before November 15, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23117 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P