Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same (II); Institution of Investigation, 49421-49422 [2017-23105]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Dexcom, Inc.,
6340 Sequence Drive, San Diego, CA
92121.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
AgaMatrix, Inc., 7C Raymond Avenue,
Salem, NH 03079.
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge. The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations will not
participate as a party in this
investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of institution of investigation
must be submitted by the named
respondent in accordance with section
210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and
210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if
received not later than 20 days after the
date of service by the Commission of the
complaint and the notice of institution
of investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the complaint
and the notice of investigation will not
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order, or both directed
against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 19, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–23104 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:06 Oct 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1076]
Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes
and Cartridges Containing the Same
(II); Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
September 19, 2017, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
on behalf of FUJIFILM Corporation of
Japan and FUJIFILM Recording Media
U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts.
A supplement to the complaint was
filed on October 6, 2017. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain magnetic data
storage tapes and cartridges containing
the same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
6,630,256 (‘‘the ’256 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 6,835,451 (‘‘the ’451 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 7,011,899 (‘‘the ’899
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,462,905 (‘‘the
’905 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
6,783,094 (‘‘the ’094 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49421
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
October 19, 2017, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain magnetic data
storage tapes and cartridges containing
the same by reason of infringement of
one or more of claims 1–5 and 7–9 of
the ’256 patent; 1–14 of the ’451 patent;
claims 1, 2, and 6–12 of the ’899 patent;
claims 1–4 of the ’905 patent; and
claims 1–12 and 18–22 of the ’094
patent, and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
FUJIFILM Corporation, 7–3 Akasaka 9chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107–0052,
Japan
FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc.,
45 Crosby Drive, Bedford, MA 01730–
1401
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
¯
Sony Corporation, 1–7–1 Konan,
Minato-ku, Tokyo 108–0075, Japan
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
49422
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices
Sony Storage Media Solutions
¯
Corporation, 1–7–1 Konan, Minatoku, Tokyo 108–0075, Japan
Sony Storage Media Manufacturing
Corporation, 3–4–1 Sakuragi, Tagajo,
Miyagi 985–0842, Japan
Sony DADC US Inc., 1800 North
Fruitridge Avenue, Terre Haute, IN
47804
Sony Latin America Inc., 5201 Blue
Lagoon Drive, Suite 400, Miami, FL
33126
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 19, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–23105 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:06 Oct 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1077]
Certain Reusable Diapers,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing the Same; Institution of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
September 19, 2017, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
on behalf of Cotton Babies, Inc. of
Fenton, Missouri. A supplement to the
Complaint was filed on October 2, 2017.
The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain reusable diapers, components
thereof, and products containing the
same by reason of infringement of U.S.
Trademark Registration No. 4,120,270
(‘‘the ’270 trademark’’) and certain
claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,518,007
(‘‘the ’007 patent’’). The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
general exclusion order, or in the
alternative a limited exclusion order,
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
October 19, 2017, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine:
(a) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain reusable diapers, components
thereof, and products containing the
same by reason of infringement of one
or more of claims 1, 13, 20, and 21 of
the ’007 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(b) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain reusable diapers, components
thereof, and products containing the
same by reason of infringement of the
’270 trademark, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Cotton Babies,
Inc., 1299 N. Highway Drive, Fenton,
MO 63026.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Alvababy.com, 4th Floor, Building 5,
Zone 2, Qingxiechang, Yaqiuhu
Industrial Park, Mumianwan, Buji
Street, Longgang District, ShenZhen,
Guangdong, China
Shenzhen Adsel Trading Co., Ltd.,
d/b/a Alva, Room 802, 8/F Haoyunlai
Building, Yanhe Road; Luohu District,
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 518000
Huizhou Huapin Garment Co., Ltd.,
Plant 23, Gexin Street, Sandong
Town, Huizhou, Guangdong, China
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49421-49422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23105]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1076]
Certain Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the
Same (II); Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 19, 2017, under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of
FUJIFILM Corporation of Japan and FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc.
of Bedford, Massachusetts. A supplement to the complaint was filed on
October 6, 2017. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States after importation of certain
magnetic data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,630,256
(``the '256 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,835,451 (``the '451 patent'');
U.S. Patent No. 7,011,899 (``the '899 patent''); U.S. Patent No.
6,462,905 (``the '905 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 6,783,094 (``the
'094 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on October 19, 2017, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain magnetic
data storage tapes and cartridges containing the same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1-5 and 7-9 of the '256 patent;
1-14 of the '451 patent; claims 1, 2, and 6-12 of the '899 patent;
claims 1-4 of the '905 patent; and claims 1-12 and 18-22 of the '094
patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required
by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1),
(f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
FUJIFILM Corporation, 7-3 Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-0052,
Japan
FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., 45 Crosby Drive, Bedford, MA
01730-1401
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Sony Corporation, 1-7-1 K[omacr]nan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0075, Japan
[[Page 49422]]
Sony Storage Media Solutions Corporation, 1-7-1 K[omacr]nan, Minato-ku,
Tokyo 108-0075, Japan
Sony Storage Media Manufacturing Corporation, 3-4-1 Sakuragi, Tagajo,
Miyagi 985-0842, Japan
Sony DADC US Inc., 1800 North Fruitridge Avenue, Terre Haute, IN 47804
Sony Latin America Inc., 5201 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 400, Miami, FL
33126
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 19, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-23105 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P