Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, and Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grant Program, 49155-49160 [2017-22850]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Proposed Rules
§ 117.T879
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in this docket and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Suspend § 117.879 from 6 a.m. on
February 26, 2018, through 6 p.m. on
July 31, 2019.
■ 3. Add a new temporary § 117.T879,
from 6 a.m. on February 26, 2018,
through 6 p.m. on July 31, 2019, to read
as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Oct 23, 2017
Jkt 244001
Isthmus Slough.
The draw of the Oregon State
secondary highway bridge, mile 1.0, at
Coos Bay, shall operate in single leaf,
and open half the draw on signal if at
least 24 hours notice is given. The
vertical clearance of the non-functioning
leaf will be reduced up to ten feet.
Dated: October 13, 2017.
Brendan C. McPherson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017–23052 Filed 10–23–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 668, 674, 682, and 685
[Docket ID ED–2017–OPE–0112]
RIN 1840–AD28
Student Assistance General
Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan
Program, Federal Family Education
Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program, and Teacher
Education Assistance for College and
Higher Education Grant Program
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Secretary proposes to
further delay, until July 1, 2019, the
effective date of selected provisions of
the final regulations entitled Student
Assistance General Provisions, Federal
Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family
Education Loan (FFEL) Program,
William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan
Program, and Teacher Education
Assistance for College and Higher
Education Grant Program (the final
regulations), published in the Federal
Register on November 1, 2016. The
Secretary proposes this further delay to
ensure that there is adequate time to
conduct negotiated rulemaking and, as
necessary, develop revised regulations.
The provisions for which we propose to
further delay the effective date are listed
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document. The current
effective date of selected provisions of
the final regulations is July 1, 2018, in
accordance with the interim final rule
(IFR) published elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before November 24, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
or hand delivery. We will not accept
comments submitted by fax or by email
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49155
or those submitted after the comment
period. To ensure that we do not receive
duplicate copies, please submit your
comments only once. In addition, please
include the Docket ID at the top of your
comments.
If you are submitting comments
electronically, we strongly encourage
you to submit any comments or
attachments in Microsoft Word format.
If you must submit a comment in
Portable Document Format (PDF), we
strongly encourage you to convert the
PDF to print-to-PDF format or to use
some other commonly used searchable
text format. Please do not submit the
PDF in a scanned format. Using a printto-PDF format allows the Department to
electronically search and copy certain
portions of your submissions.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov to submit your
comments electronically. Information
on using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing agency
documents, submitting comments, and
viewing the docket, is available on the
site under ‘‘Help.’’
• Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery,
or Hand Delivery: The Department
strongly encourages commenters to
submit their comments electronically.
However, if you mail or deliver your
comments about the notice of proposed
rulemaking, address them to Jean-Didier
Gaina, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Ave. SW., Mail Stop
6W248, Washington, DC 20202.
Privacy Note: The Department’s
policy is to make all comments received
from members of the public available for
public viewing on the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to
include in their comments only
information that they wish to make
publicly available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Hoblitzell, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW.,
Mail Stop 6W248, Washington, DC
20202. Telephone: (202) 453–7583 or by
email at: Barbara.Hoblitzell@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment: We invite
you to submit comments regarding this
notice of proposed rulemaking. We will
consider comments on the further
delayed effective date only and will not
consider comments on the wording or
substance of the final regulations. See
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
49156
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Proposed Rules
ADDRESSES for instructions on how to
submit comments.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this notice of proposed
rulemaking by accessing
Regulations.gov. You may also inspect
the comments in person in room
6W245, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and
4:00 p.m. Washington, DC time, Monday
through Friday of each week, except
Federal holidays. If you want to
schedule time to inspect comments,
please contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request, we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public-rulemaking
record for this notice of proposed
rulemaking. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, the Department is publishing
an IFR delaying until July 1, 2018, the
effective date of selected provisions of
the final regulations. The original
effective date of the final regulations
published November 1, 2016 (81 FR
75926) was July 1, 2017. On June 16,
2017, the Department published in the
Federal Register a notification of the
partial delay of effective dates under
section 705 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 705) (82 FR
27621) (705 Notice), to delay the
effectiveness of certain provisions of the
final regulations until a legal challenge
by the California Association of Private
Postsecondary Schools is resolved. See
Complaint and Prayer for Declaratory
and Injunctive Relief, California
Association of Private Postsecondary
Schools v. DeVos, Civil Action No.
1:17–cv–00999 (D.D.C. May 24, 2017).
As explained in the IFR, because the
final regulations have been postponed
by the 705 Notice beyond July 1, 2017,
they must become effective no earlier
than July 1, 2018, to comply with
section 482 of the Higher Education Act
of 1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C.
1089), also known as the ‘‘master
calendar requirement.’’
Also on June 16, 2017, the
Department announced its intent to
convene a committee to develop
proposed regulations to revise the
regulations on borrower defense to
repayment of Federal student loans and
other matters. Given that the first
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Oct 23, 2017
Jkt 244001
negotiated rulemaking session is
scheduled for November 13–15, 2017,
we cannot complete the negotiated
rulemaking process and the
development of revised regulations by
November 1, 2018. Under the master
calendar, a regulatory change that has
been published in final form on or
before November 1 prior to the start of
an award year—which begins on July 1
of any given year—may take effect only
at the beginning of the next award year,
or in other words, on July 1 of the next
year. In light of this requirement, the
regulations resulting from negotiated
rulemaking could not be effective before
July 1, 2019.
As noted previously, elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, the
Department is publishing an IFR
delaying the effective date of the final
regulations until July 1, 2018. The
Department could implement the final
regulations on July 1, 2018, pursuant to
the IFR, or, through notice and comment
rulemaking, we could delay the effective
date until July 1, 2019, or a future July
1. We propose to further delay the
effective date of the final regulations, to
continue to preserve the regulatory
status quo, until July 1, 2019. The
Department would continue to process
borrower defense claims under the
existing regulations that will remain in
effect during the delay so that borrowers
may continue to apply for the discharge
of all or a part of their loans.
Based on the above considerations,
the Department is proposing to delay
until July 1, 2019, the effective date of
the following provisions of the final
regulations in title 34 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR):
• § 668.14(b)(30), (31), and (32)
Program participation agreement.
• § 668.41(h) and (i) Reporting and
disclosure of information.
• § 668.71(c) Scope and special
definitions.
• § 668.90(a)(3) Initial and final
decisions.
• § 668.93(h), (i), and (j) Limitation.
• § 668.171 General.
• § 668.175(c), (d), (f), and (h)
Alternative standards and requirements.
• Part 668 subpart L, Appendix C.
• § 674.33(g)(3) and (g)(8) Repayment.
• § 682.202(b)(1) Permissible charges
by lenders to borrowers.
• § 682.211(i)(7) Forbearance.
• § 682.402(d)(3), (d)(6)(ii)(B)(1) and
(2), (d)(6)(ii)(F) introductory text,
(d)(6)(ii)(F)(5), (d)(6)(ii)(G), (d)(6)(ii)(H)
through (K), (d)(7)(ii) and (iii), (d)(8),
and (e)(6)(iii) Death, disability, closed
school, false certification, unpaid
refunds, and bankruptcy payments.
• § 682.405(b)(4)(ii) Loan
rehabilitation agreement.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• § 682.410(b)(4) and (b)(6)(viii)
Fiscal, administrative, and enforcement
requirements.
• § 685.200(f)(3)(v) and (f)(4)(iii)
Borrower eligibility.
• § 685.205(b)(6) Forbearance.
• § 685.206(c) Borrower
responsibilities and defenses.
• § 685.212(k) Discharge of a loan
obligation.
• § 685.214(c)(2) and (f)(4) through (7)
Closed school discharge.
• § 685.215(a)(1), (c)(1) through (c)(8),
and (d) Discharge for false certification
of student eligibility or unauthorized
payment.
• § 685.222 Borrower defenses.
• Part 685 subpart B, Appendix A
Examples of borrower relief.
• § 685.300(b)(11), (b)(12), and (d)
through (i) Agreements between an
eligible school and the Secretary for
participation in the Direct Loan
Program.
• § 685.308(a) Remedial actions.
As noted in the IFR, the Department
interprets all references to ‘‘July 1,
2017’’ in the text of the abovereferenced regulations to mean the
effective date of those regulations. The
regulatory text included references to
the specific July 1, 2017, date in part to
provide clarity to readers in the future
as to when the regulations had taken
effect. Because the regulations did not
take effect on July 1, 2017, we would,
in connection with this proposed
additional delay of effective date, read
those regulations as referring to the new
effective date established by this further
delay, i.e., July 1, 2019.
This proposed delay of the final
regulations will not delay the effective
dates of the following regulatory
provisions published in 81 FR 75926
which: (1) Expand the types of
documentation that may be used for the
granting of a discharge based on the
death of the borrower; (2) amend the
regulations governing the consolidation
of Nursing Student Loans and Nurse
Faculty Loans so that they align with
the statutory requirements of section
428C(a)(4)(E) of the HEA; (3) amend the
regulations governing Direct
Consolidation Loans to allow a borrower
to obtain a Direct Consolidation Loan
regardless of whether the borrower is
also seeking to consolidate a Direct Loan
Program or FFEL Program loan, if the
borrower has a loan type identified in
34 CFR 685.220(b); (4) address
severability; and (5) make technical
corrections. As established in 81 FR
75926, 34 CFR 682.211(i)(7) and
682.410(b)(6)(viii) would remain
designated for early implementation, at
the discretion of each lender or guaranty
agency.
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Waiver of Negotiated Rulemaking:
Under section 492 of the HEA (20 U.S.C.
1098a), all regulations proposed by the
Department for programs authorized
under title IV of the HEA are subject to
negotiated rulemaking requirements.
However, section 492(b)(2) of the HEA
provides that negotiated rulemaking
may be waived for good cause when
doing so would be ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Section 492(b)(2) of the HEA
also requires the Secretary to publish
the basis for waiving negotiations in the
Federal Register at the same time as the
proposed regulations in question are
first published.
For the reasons stated above, it would
not be practicable, before the July 1,
2018 effective date specified in the IFR,
to engage in negotiated rulemaking and
publish final regulations. There is,
therefore, good cause to waive
negotiated rulemaking pertaining to this
delay.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, it must
be determined whether this regulatory
action is ‘‘significant’’ and, therefore,
subject to the requirements of the
Executive Order and subject to review
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as an action likely to
result in a rule that may—
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities in a material way (also
referred to as an ‘‘economically
significant’’ rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
stated in the Executive order.
The Department estimates the
quantified annualized economic and net
budget impacts of the delay of the
effective date to be -$26.9 million in
reduced costs to institutions and the
Federal government. These reduced
costs result from the delay of the
borrower defense provisions of the final
regulations as they would apply to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Oct 23, 2017
Jkt 244001
2017 to 2019 loan cohorts, as well as
from the delayed paperwork burden on
institutions, and the delayed execution
of the closed school automatic
discharge. This proposed regulatory
action is a significant regulatory action
subject to review by OMB under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this proposed
rule under Executive Order 13563,
which supplements and explicitly
reaffirms the principles, structures, and
definitions governing regulatory review
established in Executive Order 12866.
To the extent permitted by law,
Executive Order 13563 requires that an
agency—
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only
on a reasoned determination that their
benefits justify their costs (recognizing
that some benefits and costs are difficult
to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the
least burden on society, consistent with
obtaining regulatory objectives and
taking into account—among other things
and to the extent practicable—the costs
of cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, select those
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify
performance objectives, rather than the
behavior or manner of compliance a
regulated entity must adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available
alternatives to direct regulation,
including economic incentives—such as
user fees or marketable permits—to
encourage the desired behavior, or
provide information that enables the
public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires
an agency ‘‘to use the best available
techniques to quantify anticipated
present and future benefits and costs as
accurately as possible.’’ The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ‘‘identifying
changing future compliance costs that
might result from technological
innovation or anticipated behavioral
changes.’’
We are issuing this proposed rule
only on a reasoned determination that
its benefits justify its costs. Based on the
analysis that follows, the Department
believes that this proposed rule is
consistent with the principles in
Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, or Tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49157
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive
orders, the Department has assessed the
potential costs and benefits, both
quantitative and qualitative, of this
regulatory action.
The quantified economic effects and
net budget impact associated with the
delayed effective date are not expected
to be economically significant.
Effects of One-Year Delay
As indicated in the Regulatory Impact
Analysis (RIA) published with the final
regulations on November 1, 2016, the
final regulations were economically
significant with a total estimated net
budget impact of $16.6 billion over the
2017–2026 loan cohorts in the primary
estimate scenario, including a cost of
$381 million for cohorts 2014–2016
attributable to the provisions for a threeyear automatic closed school discharge.
As the net budget impact is based on the
net present value of the cash flows of
the relevant cohorts over 40 years,
delaying the final regulations for an
additional year will have limited effect,
as discussed below. This analysis is
limited to the effect of delaying the
effective date of the final regulations an
additional year from July 1, 2018 to July
1, 2019, and does not account for any
potential changes in the final
regulations.
Even with the further delayed
effective date, borrowers will still be
able to submit claims. The provisions of
the final regulations pertaining to the
process for review and determination of
claims were not limited to specific
cohorts designated by the effective date
so the delay will not result in specific
cohorts of borrowers being excluded
from the process reflected in the final
regulations, when implemented. Once
in effect, the protection generated by the
financial protection provisions will be
available to be applied to claims from
loans originated earlier, including the
period from July 1, 2018 to June 30,
2019. Loans made before July 1, 2017,
were always subject to the State-based
standard and borrowers’ ability to bring
claims under that standard is
unchanged by the delay. For claims
filed after the effective date of the
regulations, for loans made on or after
July 1, 2019, the Federal standard
established in the final regulations
would apply. As discussed previously,
the Department interprets all references
to ‘‘July 1, 2017’’ in the text of the final
regulations to mean the effective date of
the final regulations. As a result, the
further delay in the effective date means
that loans made between July 1, 2018
and June 30, 2019, will be subject to the
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
49158
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Proposed Rules
current State-based standard. As we
noted in the final regulations, the
Federal standard was designed to
address much of the conduct already
covered by the State-based standard, so
the vast majority of claims associated
with loans made between July 1, 2017,
and the delayed effective date could be
made under the current, State-based
standard as well.
In addition to borrowers, institutions
are also affected by the delayed effective
date. As indicated in the RIA for the
final regulations, institutions bear the
major costs of compliance, paperwork
burden, and providing financial
protection. The financial protection
provisions of the final regulations
depend on the effective date, so
institutions will not incur these costs
until the final regulations are in effect.
In terms of cost savings for institutions,
the estimated annual paperwork burden
was approximately $9.4 million in the
initial year of the final regulations. In
the revised scenario developed to
estimate the effect of the additional oneyear delay in the effective date, transfers
from institutions to students, via the
Federal government, would be reduced
by approximately $9.3 million for the
2017 and 2018 loan cohorts. The costs
of providing financial protection were
not quantified in the RIA for the final
regulations, and the Department has no
additional data to estimate costs
institutions may avoid from the delayed
effective date of the financial protection
provisions.
Net Budget Impact
In order to estimate the net budget
impact of the additional one-year delay
in the effective date to July 1, 2019, the
Department developed a scenario that
revised the primary estimate
assumptions from the final regulations
for the affected 2017 to 2019 loan
cohorts, as was done for the one-year
delay described in the IFR. As before,
the Department applies an assumed
level of school misconduct, borrower
claims success, and recoveries from
institutions (respectively labeled as
Conduct Percent, Borrower Percent, and
Recovery Percent in Table 1) to the
President’s Budget 2018 (PB2018) loan
volume estimates to generate the
estimated net borrower defense claims
for each cohort, loan type, and sector.
The assumptions for the primary
scenario from the 2016 final regulation
were the basis for the President’s Budget
2018 (PB2018) baseline that assumed
the final regulations would go into effect
on July 1, 2017. The scenario developed
for this NPRM is designed to capture the
incremental change from the one-year
delay in the IFR associated with the
further one-year delay in the effective
date to July 1, 2019. Compared to the
scenario developed for the IFR,
recoveries are reduced by an additional
two percent for the 2017 and 2018
cohorts, all of the 2018 cohort is subject
to the State-based standard, and the
affected portion of the 2019 cohort is
subject to the current, State-based
standard and reduced recoveries at the
five percent level used for the one-year
delay in the IFR. Table 1 presents
assumptions for the primary estimate
from the final regulations and the
revised estimate for the further one-year
delay, from July 1, 2018 to July 1, 2019,
in the effective date. In this scenario, the
conduct percent is 90 percent of the
primary scenario from the final
regulations and the borrower percent is
the same. The financial protection
provided was always expected to
increase over time, so the delayed
effective date in the near term is not
expected to significantly affect the
amount of recoveries over the life of any
particular loan cohort, limiting any net
budget impact from the delay. To
estimate the potential reduction in
recoveries related to the proposed
delayed effective date, we reduced
recoveries for the affected portion of the
2017 and 2018 cohorts by seven percent
for the private not-for-profit and
proprietary sectors and by five percent
for the 2019 cohort. As in the final
regulations and the IFR, recoveries from
public institutions were held constant at
75 percent across scenarios.
TABLE 1—REVISED ASSUMPTIONS FOR ONE-YEAR DELAY FROM JULY 1, 2018 TO JULY 1, 2019
2017
2018
2019
Cohort
Pub/Priv NFP
Conduct Percent:
Final Primary .....................................
Delay to 2019 ...................................
Borrower Percent:
Final Primary .....................................
Delay to 2019 ...................................
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Pub/Priv NFP
Prop
20
18
2.4
2.16
16
14.4
2.0
1.8
13.6
12.24
45
45
36.8
36.8
47.3
47.3
36.8
36.8
47.3
47.3
Priv/Prop
75
75
The net budget impact associated
with these effects of the additional oneyear delay in the effective date on the
borrower defense provisions only is
approximately -$46.1 million from the
2017 to 2019 loan cohorts.
As the amount and composition of
borrower defense claims and estimated
recoveries over the lifetime of the
relevant loan cohorts are not expected to
change greatly due to the delayed
effective date, the Department does not
estimate an economically significant net
Jkt 244001
Prop
35
35
Recovery Percent:
Final Primary .....................................
Delay to 2019 ...................................
18:07 Oct 23, 2017
Pub/Priv NFP
3.0
2.7
Public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Prop
Public
23.8
22.134
Priv/Prop
75
75
budget impact from the delay itself,
with a potential net budget impact
related to borrower defense claims of
-$46.1 million in reduced costs for the
affected cohorts. This represents the
incremental change associated with the
additional one-year delay from July 1,
2018 to July 1, 2019. If compared to the
PB2018 baseline, the savings would be
approximately -$78.8 million.
The closed school automatic
discharge provisions were the other
significant source of estimated net
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23.8
22.134
Public
Priv/Prop
75
75
23.8
24.871
budget impact in the final regulations.
Under credit reform scoring, the
modification to older cohorts for the
automatic discharge provision estimated
to cost $364 million was expected to
occur in fiscal year (FY) 2017 in the
President’s Budget for FY 2018
(PB2018). As a result of the delay in the
effective date, the Department will not
execute the modification in FY 2017.
As indicated in the IFR, the
Department does expect to incur the
costs associated with the three-year
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
49159
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Proposed Rules
automatic discharge after the delayed
effective date, but moving the execution
of the modification beyond FY 2017 will
require a new cost analysis with
economic assumptions from the fiscal
year of the execution. This will result in
a change of cost, but at this point it is
not possible to know the discount rates
in future fiscal years, so the cost of the
modification will be determined in the
year that it is executed. While the actual
cost of the future modification cannot be
determined at this time, the Department
did approximate the effect of the delay
by shifting the timing of the relevant
discharges back by a year and
recalculating a modification using the
discount rates and economic
assumptions used for the calculation of
the PB2018 modification. When
calculated in this manner, the delay in
the modification to July 2018 described
in the IFR resulted in estimated savings
of less than $10 million. Using the same
approach, the further delay to July 2019
is expected to save approximately $15
million above the savings from the
initial one-year delay.
As the delay does not change the
substance of the automatic discharge,
we would expect the amount and
composition of loans affected by the
automatic discharge not to change
significantly. The closed school threeyear automatic discharge provisions
were applicable to loans made on or
after November 1, 2013, and were not
linked to the effective date of the final
regulations. Therefore, delaying the
effective date of those provisions will
not change the set of loans eligible for
this automatic discharge. Additionally,
borrowers would have the ability to
apply for a closed school discharge
before July 1, 2019, if they did not want
to wait for the automatic discharge to be
implemented. For future cohorts, the
delay is not significant as the three-year
period will fall beyond the delayed
effective date. Any significant change to
the estimated net budget impact
associated with the closed school
automatic discharge depends on any
substantive changes made to the
provisions as a result of the upcoming
rulemaking and changes to economic
assumptions when the modification is
executed.
Consistent with Executive Order
13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017),
we have estimated that this proposed
rule will result in cost savings.
Therefore, this proposed rule would be
considered an Executive Order 13771
deregulatory action.
Accounting Statement
In evaluating whether a regulation is
economically significant, a key
consideration is whether the annual
effect in any given year is over $100
million. To evaluate this, the
Department looked at the difference in
the undiscounted cashflows related to
the death, disability, and bankruptcy
(DDB) claims in which borrower defense
claims are included for the one-year
delay established in the IFR and the
further one-year delay scenario
described under Net Budget Impacts.
The difference from subtracting the
further delay scenario from the IFR oneyear delay scenario for the 2017 to 2019
cohorts is summarized in Table 2.
TABLE 2—DIFFERENCE IN UNDISCOUNTED NET CASHFLOWS FOR THE 2017 TO 2019 LOAN COHORTS FROM THE FURTHER
ONE-YEAR DELAY IN 2016 BORROWER DEFENSE RULE TO JULY 1, 2019
FY 2017
Change in DDB Cashflow ....................................................
FY 2018
159
FY 2022
Change in DDB Cashflow ....................................................
Table 3 shows the effects when those
differences in the DDB cashflows are
7,489
FY 2023
6,004,802
9,525,520
FY 2019
496,637
FY 2024
4,668,143
FY 2020
FY 2021
637,361
FY 2025
538,468
FY 2026
2,156,009
3,003,657
discounted at 7 and 3 percent and
annualized.
Category
Benefits
Institutions may not incur compliance costs or costs of obtaining financial protection until the rule is in effect. ..
Not Quantified
Category
Costs
7%
Continued use of State-law based standard
Delay in providing consumer information about institution’s performance and practices
Potential decreased awareness and usage of closed school and false certification discharges
3%
Not Quantified
¥9.5
Savings associated with delay in compliance with paperwork requirements. ........................................................
Category
Transfers
7%
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
¥9.51
3%
Reduction in transfers from the Federal Government to affected borrowers in the 2017 to 2019 cohorts that
would have been partially borne by affected institutions via reimbursements. ...................................................
¥3.5
¥3.8
Reduced reimbursements from affected institutions to affected students, via the Federal government as loan
cohorts 2017 to 2019 are subject to the existing borrower defense regulation. .................................................
¥1.2
¥1.3
Delay in closed school automatic discharge implementation from 2018 to 2019 ..................................................
¥14.8
¥14.8
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Oct 23, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
49160
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
As indicated in the Paperwork
Reduction Act section published in the
final regulations, the assessed estimated
burden was 253,136 hours, affecting
both institutions and individuals, with
an estimated annual cost of $9,458,484.
Regulatory section
The table below identifies the regulatory
sections, OMB Control Numbers,
estimated burden hours, and estimated
costs of the final regulations.
OMB Control No.
Burden hours
Estimated cost
$36.55/hour
institution
$16.30/hour
individual
1845–0022
1845–0004
1845–0022
1845–0022
1845–0020
1845–0020
1845–0142
1845–0142
1845–0143
1,953 ..............................
5,346 ..............................
3,028 ..............................
60,560 ............................
5,784 ..............................
1,838 ..............................
249 (Individuals) ............
800 (Institutions) ............
179,362 ..........................
71,382
195,396
110,673
2,213,468
211,405
67,179
4,059
29,240
6,555,681
Total .........................................................................................................
Cost savings due to delayed effective date excluding 682.211 early implementation allowed.
Burden remaining ............................................................................................
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
668.14 ..............................................................................................................
668.41 ..............................................................................................................
668.171 ............................................................................................................
668.175 ............................................................................................................
682.211 ............................................................................................................
682.402 ............................................................................................................
685.222 ............................................................................................................
685.222 ............................................................................................................
685.300 ............................................................................................................
..............................
..............................
258,920 ..........................
253,136 ..........................
9,458,484
9,247,079
..............................
5,784 ..............................
211,405
This notice of proposed rulemaking
delays the effective date of the
implementation of all of the cited
regulations and would result in a cost
savings of the total amount of
$9,458,484. However, § 682.211(i)(7) of
the final regulations, regarding
mandatory forbearance based on a
borrower defense claim, with an
estimated 5,784 hours and $211,405
cost, as would continue to be designated
for early implementation. Lenders may
have elected early implementation and,
therefore, those specific costs and hours
remain applicable and have been
subtracted from the overall estimated
cost saving. Based on the delayed
effective date of July 1, 2019, the revised
estimated annual cost savings to
institutions and individuals is
$9,247,079 ($9,458,484 ¥ $211,405)
with an estimated burden hours savings
of 253,136 (258,920 ¥ 5,784).
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities may obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to this Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site, you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or PDF. To use PDF, you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Oct 23, 2017
Jkt 244001
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
34 CFR Part 668
34 CFR Part 674
Loan programs—education, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Student aid.
34 CFR Parts 682 and 685
Administrative practice and
procedure, Colleges and universities,
Loan programs—education, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Student aid, Vocational education.
Dated: October 16, 2017.
Betsy DeVos,
Secretary of Education.
[FR Doc. 2017–22850 Filed 10–20–17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
Fmt 4702
International Mailing Services:
Proposed Product and Price
Changes—CPI
Postal ServiceTM.
Proposed rule with a request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service proposes
to revise Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service,
International Mail Manual (IMM®), to
reflect changes in the prices, product
features, and classification changes to
Mailing Services. These changes would
also implement a restriction on the
contents of First-Class Mail
International® to documents only, to
comply with standards established by
the Universal Postal Union (UPU).
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before November 24, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver comments to
the manager, Product Classification,
U.S. Postal Service®, 475 L’Enfant Plaza
SW., RM 4446, Washington, DC 20260–
5015. You may inspect and photocopy
all written comments at USPS®
Headquarters Library, 475 L’Enfant
Plaza SW., 11th Floor N, Washington,
DC by appointment only between the
hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday by calling 1–202–268–
2906 in advance. Email comments,
containing the name and address of the
commenter, to: ProductClassification@
usps.gov, with a subject line of ‘‘January
2018 International Mailing Services
Price Change—CPI.’’ Faxed comments
are not accepted.
SUMMARY:
Administrative practice and
procedure, Colleges and universities,
Consumer protection, Grant programs—
education, Loan programs—education,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Selective Service System,
Student aid, Vocational education.
Frm 00017
39 CFR Part 20
ACTION:
List of Subjects
PO 00000
POSTAL SERVICE
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49155-49160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22850]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 668, 674, 682, and 685
[Docket ID ED-2017-OPE-0112]
RIN 1840-AD28
Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan
Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program, and Teacher Education Assistance for College and
Higher Education Grant Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary proposes to further delay, until July 1, 2019,
the effective date of selected provisions of the final regulations
entitled Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan
Program, Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program, William D. Ford
Federal Direct Loan Program, and Teacher Education Assistance for
College and Higher Education Grant Program (the final regulations),
published in the Federal Register on November 1, 2016. The Secretary
proposes this further delay to ensure that there is adequate time to
conduct negotiated rulemaking and, as necessary, develop revised
regulations. The provisions for which we propose to further delay the
effective date are listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. The current effective date of selected provisions of the
final regulations is July 1, 2018, in accordance with the interim final
rule (IFR) published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before November 24, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. We will not
accept comments submitted by fax or by email or those submitted after
the comment period. To ensure that we do not receive duplicate copies,
please submit your comments only once. In addition, please include the
Docket ID at the top of your comments.
If you are submitting comments electronically, we strongly
encourage you to submit any comments or attachments in Microsoft Word
format. If you must submit a comment in Portable Document Format (PDF),
we strongly encourage you to convert the PDF to print-to-PDF format or
to use some other commonly used searchable text format. Please do not
submit the PDF in a scanned format. Using a print-to-PDF format allows
the Department to electronically search and copy certain portions of
your submissions.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov to
submit your comments electronically. Information on using
Regulations.gov, including instructions for accessing agency documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the docket, is available on the site
under ``Help.''
Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, or Hand Delivery: The
Department strongly encourages commenters to submit their comments
electronically. However, if you mail or deliver your comments about the
notice of proposed rulemaking, address them to Jean-Didier Gaina, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW., Mail Stop 6W248,
Washington, DC 20202.
Privacy Note: The Department's policy is to make all comments
received from members of the public available for public viewing on the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to include in their comments only
information that they wish to make publicly available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Hoblitzell, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW., Mail Stop 6W248, Washington, DC
20202. Telephone: (202) 453-7583 or by email at:
[email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment: We invite you to submit comments regarding
this notice of proposed rulemaking. We will consider comments on the
further delayed effective date only and will not consider comments on
the wording or substance of the final regulations. See
[[Page 49156]]
ADDRESSES for instructions on how to submit comments.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this notice of proposed rulemaking by accessing
Regulations.gov. You may also inspect the comments in person in room
6W245, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and
4:00 p.m. Washington, DC time, Monday through Friday of each week,
except Federal holidays. If you want to schedule time to inspect
comments, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request, we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who
needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the
public-rulemaking record for this notice of proposed rulemaking. If you
want to schedule an appointment for this type of accommodation or
auxiliary aid, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the Department is
publishing an IFR delaying until July 1, 2018, the effective date of
selected provisions of the final regulations. The original effective
date of the final regulations published November 1, 2016 (81 FR 75926)
was July 1, 2017. On June 16, 2017, the Department published in the
Federal Register a notification of the partial delay of effective dates
under section 705 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 705)
(82 FR 27621) (705 Notice), to delay the effectiveness of certain
provisions of the final regulations until a legal challenge by the
California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools is resolved.
See Complaint and Prayer for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief,
California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools v. DeVos, Civil
Action No. 1:17-cv-00999 (D.D.C. May 24, 2017). As explained in the
IFR, because the final regulations have been postponed by the 705
Notice beyond July 1, 2017, they must become effective no earlier than
July 1, 2018, to comply with section 482 of the Higher Education Act of
1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C. 1089), also known as the ``master
calendar requirement.''
Also on June 16, 2017, the Department announced its intent to
convene a committee to develop proposed regulations to revise the
regulations on borrower defense to repayment of Federal student loans
and other matters. Given that the first negotiated rulemaking session
is scheduled for November 13-15, 2017, we cannot complete the
negotiated rulemaking process and the development of revised
regulations by November 1, 2018. Under the master calendar, a
regulatory change that has been published in final form on or before
November 1 prior to the start of an award year--which begins on July 1
of any given year--may take effect only at the beginning of the next
award year, or in other words, on July 1 of the next year. In light of
this requirement, the regulations resulting from negotiated rulemaking
could not be effective before July 1, 2019.
As noted previously, elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, the Department is publishing an IFR delaying the effective
date of the final regulations until July 1, 2018. The Department could
implement the final regulations on July 1, 2018, pursuant to the IFR,
or, through notice and comment rulemaking, we could delay the effective
date until July 1, 2019, or a future July 1. We propose to further
delay the effective date of the final regulations, to continue to
preserve the regulatory status quo, until July 1, 2019. The Department
would continue to process borrower defense claims under the existing
regulations that will remain in effect during the delay so that
borrowers may continue to apply for the discharge of all or a part of
their loans.
Based on the above considerations, the Department is proposing to
delay until July 1, 2019, the effective date of the following
provisions of the final regulations in title 34 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR):
Sec. 668.14(b)(30), (31), and (32) Program participation
agreement.
Sec. 668.41(h) and (i) Reporting and disclosure of
information.
Sec. 668.71(c) Scope and special definitions.
Sec. 668.90(a)(3) Initial and final decisions.
Sec. 668.93(h), (i), and (j) Limitation.
Sec. 668.171 General.
Sec. 668.175(c), (d), (f), and (h) Alternative standards
and requirements.
Part 668 subpart L, Appendix C.
Sec. 674.33(g)(3) and (g)(8) Repayment.
Sec. 682.202(b)(1) Permissible charges by lenders to
borrowers.
Sec. 682.211(i)(7) Forbearance.
Sec. 682.402(d)(3), (d)(6)(ii)(B)(1) and (2),
(d)(6)(ii)(F) introductory text, (d)(6)(ii)(F)(5), (d)(6)(ii)(G),
(d)(6)(ii)(H) through (K), (d)(7)(ii) and (iii), (d)(8), and
(e)(6)(iii) Death, disability, closed school, false certification,
unpaid refunds, and bankruptcy payments.
Sec. 682.405(b)(4)(ii) Loan rehabilitation agreement.
Sec. 682.410(b)(4) and (b)(6)(viii) Fiscal,
administrative, and enforcement requirements.
Sec. 685.200(f)(3)(v) and (f)(4)(iii) Borrower
eligibility.
Sec. 685.205(b)(6) Forbearance.
Sec. 685.206(c) Borrower responsibilities and defenses.
Sec. 685.212(k) Discharge of a loan obligation.
Sec. 685.214(c)(2) and (f)(4) through (7) Closed school
discharge.
Sec. 685.215(a)(1), (c)(1) through (c)(8), and (d)
Discharge for false certification of student eligibility or
unauthorized payment.
Sec. 685.222 Borrower defenses.
Part 685 subpart B, Appendix A Examples of borrower
relief.
Sec. 685.300(b)(11), (b)(12), and (d) through (i)
Agreements between an eligible school and the Secretary for
participation in the Direct Loan Program.
Sec. 685.308(a) Remedial actions.
As noted in the IFR, the Department interprets all references to
``July 1, 2017'' in the text of the above-referenced regulations to
mean the effective date of those regulations. The regulatory text
included references to the specific July 1, 2017, date in part to
provide clarity to readers in the future as to when the regulations had
taken effect. Because the regulations did not take effect on July 1,
2017, we would, in connection with this proposed additional delay of
effective date, read those regulations as referring to the new
effective date established by this further delay, i.e., July 1, 2019.
This proposed delay of the final regulations will not delay the
effective dates of the following regulatory provisions published in 81
FR 75926 which: (1) Expand the types of documentation that may be used
for the granting of a discharge based on the death of the borrower; (2)
amend the regulations governing the consolidation of Nursing Student
Loans and Nurse Faculty Loans so that they align with the statutory
requirements of section 428C(a)(4)(E) of the HEA; (3) amend the
regulations governing Direct Consolidation Loans to allow a borrower to
obtain a Direct Consolidation Loan regardless of whether the borrower
is also seeking to consolidate a Direct Loan Program or FFEL Program
loan, if the borrower has a loan type identified in 34 CFR 685.220(b);
(4) address severability; and (5) make technical corrections. As
established in 81 FR 75926, 34 CFR 682.211(i)(7) and
682.410(b)(6)(viii) would remain designated for early implementation,
at the discretion of each lender or guaranty agency.
[[Page 49157]]
Waiver of Negotiated Rulemaking: Under section 492 of the HEA (20
U.S.C. 1098a), all regulations proposed by the Department for programs
authorized under title IV of the HEA are subject to negotiated
rulemaking requirements. However, section 492(b)(2) of the HEA provides
that negotiated rulemaking may be waived for good cause when doing so
would be ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Section 492(b)(2) of the HEA also requires the Secretary to
publish the basis for waiving negotiations in the Federal Register at
the same time as the proposed regulations in question are first
published.
For the reasons stated above, it would not be practicable, before
the July 1, 2018 effective date specified in the IFR, to engage in
negotiated rulemaking and publish final regulations. There is,
therefore, good cause to waive negotiated rulemaking pertaining to this
delay.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, it must be determined whether this
regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to the
requirements of the Executive Order and subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action likely to
result in a rule that may--
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or
Tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to
as an ``economically significant'' rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the
Executive order.
The Department estimates the quantified annualized economic and net
budget impacts of the delay of the effective date to be -$26.9 million
in reduced costs to institutions and the Federal government. These
reduced costs result from the delay of the borrower defense provisions
of the final regulations as they would apply to the 2017 to 2019 loan
cohorts, as well as from the delayed paperwork burden on institutions,
and the delayed execution of the closed school automatic discharge.
This proposed regulatory action is a significant regulatory action
subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this proposed rule under Executive Order
13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency--
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only on a reasoned determination
that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits
and costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society,
consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into
account--among other things and to the extent practicable--the costs of
cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select
those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather
than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must
adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct
regulation, including economic incentives--such as user fees or
marketable permits--to encourage the desired behavior, or provide
information that enables the public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ``to use the best
available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future
benefits and costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ``identifying changing future compliance costs
that might result from technological innovation or anticipated
behavioral changes.''
We are issuing this proposed rule only on a reasoned determination
that its benefits justify its costs. Based on the analysis that
follows, the Department believes that this proposed rule is consistent
with the principles in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, or Tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive orders, the Department has
assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and
qualitative, of this regulatory action.
The quantified economic effects and net budget impact associated
with the delayed effective date are not expected to be economically
significant.
Effects of One-Year Delay
As indicated in the Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) published with
the final regulations on November 1, 2016, the final regulations were
economically significant with a total estimated net budget impact of
$16.6 billion over the 2017-2026 loan cohorts in the primary estimate
scenario, including a cost of $381 million for cohorts 2014-2016
attributable to the provisions for a three-year automatic closed school
discharge. As the net budget impact is based on the net present value
of the cash flows of the relevant cohorts over 40 years, delaying the
final regulations for an additional year will have limited effect, as
discussed below. This analysis is limited to the effect of delaying the
effective date of the final regulations an additional year from July 1,
2018 to July 1, 2019, and does not account for any potential changes in
the final regulations.
Even with the further delayed effective date, borrowers will still
be able to submit claims. The provisions of the final regulations
pertaining to the process for review and determination of claims were
not limited to specific cohorts designated by the effective date so the
delay will not result in specific cohorts of borrowers being excluded
from the process reflected in the final regulations, when implemented.
Once in effect, the protection generated by the financial protection
provisions will be available to be applied to claims from loans
originated earlier, including the period from July 1, 2018 to June 30,
2019. Loans made before July 1, 2017, were always subject to the State-
based standard and borrowers' ability to bring claims under that
standard is unchanged by the delay. For claims filed after the
effective date of the regulations, for loans made on or after July 1,
2019, the Federal standard established in the final regulations would
apply. As discussed previously, the Department interprets all
references to ``July 1, 2017'' in the text of the final regulations to
mean the effective date of the final regulations. As a result, the
further delay in the effective date means that loans made between July
1, 2018 and June 30, 2019, will be subject to the
[[Page 49158]]
current State-based standard. As we noted in the final regulations, the
Federal standard was designed to address much of the conduct already
covered by the State-based standard, so the vast majority of claims
associated with loans made between July 1, 2017, and the delayed
effective date could be made under the current, State-based standard as
well.
In addition to borrowers, institutions are also affected by the
delayed effective date. As indicated in the RIA for the final
regulations, institutions bear the major costs of compliance, paperwork
burden, and providing financial protection. The financial protection
provisions of the final regulations depend on the effective date, so
institutions will not incur these costs until the final regulations are
in effect. In terms of cost savings for institutions, the estimated
annual paperwork burden was approximately $9.4 million in the initial
year of the final regulations. In the revised scenario developed to
estimate the effect of the additional one-year delay in the effective
date, transfers from institutions to students, via the Federal
government, would be reduced by approximately $9.3 million for the 2017
and 2018 loan cohorts. The costs of providing financial protection were
not quantified in the RIA for the final regulations, and the Department
has no additional data to estimate costs institutions may avoid from
the delayed effective date of the financial protection provisions.
Net Budget Impact
In order to estimate the net budget impact of the additional one-
year delay in the effective date to July 1, 2019, the Department
developed a scenario that revised the primary estimate assumptions from
the final regulations for the affected 2017 to 2019 loan cohorts, as
was done for the one-year delay described in the IFR. As before, the
Department applies an assumed level of school misconduct, borrower
claims success, and recoveries from institutions (respectively labeled
as Conduct Percent, Borrower Percent, and Recovery Percent in Table 1)
to the President's Budget 2018 (PB2018) loan volume estimates to
generate the estimated net borrower defense claims for each cohort,
loan type, and sector. The assumptions for the primary scenario from
the 2016 final regulation were the basis for the President's Budget
2018 (PB2018) baseline that assumed the final regulations would go into
effect on July 1, 2017. The scenario developed for this NPRM is
designed to capture the incremental change from the one-year delay in
the IFR associated with the further one-year delay in the effective
date to July 1, 2019. Compared to the scenario developed for the IFR,
recoveries are reduced by an additional two percent for the 2017 and
2018 cohorts, all of the 2018 cohort is subject to the State-based
standard, and the affected portion of the 2019 cohort is subject to the
current, State-based standard and reduced recoveries at the five
percent level used for the one-year delay in the IFR. Table 1 presents
assumptions for the primary estimate from the final regulations and the
revised estimate for the further one-year delay, from July 1, 2018 to
July 1, 2019, in the effective date. In this scenario, the conduct
percent is 90 percent of the primary scenario from the final
regulations and the borrower percent is the same. The financial
protection provided was always expected to increase over time, so the
delayed effective date in the near term is not expected to
significantly affect the amount of recoveries over the life of any
particular loan cohort, limiting any net budget impact from the delay.
To estimate the potential reduction in recoveries related to the
proposed delayed effective date, we reduced recoveries for the affected
portion of the 2017 and 2018 cohorts by seven percent for the private
not-for-profit and proprietary sectors and by five percent for the 2019
cohort. As in the final regulations and the IFR, recoveries from public
institutions were held constant at 75 percent across scenarios.
Table 1--Revised Assumptions for One-Year Delay From July 1, 2018 to July 1, 2019
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017 2018 2019
Cohort -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pub/Priv NFP Prop Pub/Priv NFP Prop Pub/Priv NFP Prop
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conduct Percent:
Final Primary....................................... 3.0 20 2.4 16 2.0 13.6
Delay to 2019....................................... 2.7 18 2.16 14.4 1.8 12.24
Borrower Percent:
Final Primary....................................... 35 45 36.8 47.3 36.8 47.3
Delay to 2019....................................... 35 45 36.8 47.3 36.8 47.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0Public Priv/Prop Public Priv/Prop Public Priv/Prop
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recovery Percent:
Final Primary....................................... 75 23.8 75 23.8 75 23.8
Delay to 2019....................................... 75 22.134 75 22.134 75 24.871
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The net budget impact associated with these effects of the
additional one-year delay in the effective date on the borrower defense
provisions only is approximately -$46.1 million from the 2017 to 2019
loan cohorts.
As the amount and composition of borrower defense claims and
estimated recoveries over the lifetime of the relevant loan cohorts are
not expected to change greatly due to the delayed effective date, the
Department does not estimate an economically significant net budget
impact from the delay itself, with a potential net budget impact
related to borrower defense claims of -$46.1 million in reduced costs
for the affected cohorts. This represents the incremental change
associated with the additional one-year delay from July 1, 2018 to July
1, 2019. If compared to the PB2018 baseline, the savings would be
approximately -$78.8 million.
The closed school automatic discharge provisions were the other
significant source of estimated net budget impact in the final
regulations. Under credit reform scoring, the modification to older
cohorts for the automatic discharge provision estimated to cost $364
million was expected to occur in fiscal year (FY) 2017 in the
President's Budget for FY 2018 (PB2018). As a result of the delay in
the effective date, the Department will not execute the modification in
FY 2017.
As indicated in the IFR, the Department does expect to incur the
costs associated with the three-year
[[Page 49159]]
automatic discharge after the delayed effective date, but moving the
execution of the modification beyond FY 2017 will require a new cost
analysis with economic assumptions from the fiscal year of the
execution. This will result in a change of cost, but at this point it
is not possible to know the discount rates in future fiscal years, so
the cost of the modification will be determined in the year that it is
executed. While the actual cost of the future modification cannot be
determined at this time, the Department did approximate the effect of
the delay by shifting the timing of the relevant discharges back by a
year and recalculating a modification using the discount rates and
economic assumptions used for the calculation of the PB2018
modification. When calculated in this manner, the delay in the
modification to July 2018 described in the IFR resulted in estimated
savings of less than $10 million. Using the same approach, the further
delay to July 2019 is expected to save approximately $15 million above
the savings from the initial one-year delay.
As the delay does not change the substance of the automatic
discharge, we would expect the amount and composition of loans affected
by the automatic discharge not to change significantly. The closed
school three-year automatic discharge provisions were applicable to
loans made on or after November 1, 2013, and were not linked to the
effective date of the final regulations. Therefore, delaying the
effective date of those provisions will not change the set of loans
eligible for this automatic discharge. Additionally, borrowers would
have the ability to apply for a closed school discharge before July 1,
2019, if they did not want to wait for the automatic discharge to be
implemented. For future cohorts, the delay is not significant as the
three-year period will fall beyond the delayed effective date. Any
significant change to the estimated net budget impact associated with
the closed school automatic discharge depends on any substantive
changes made to the provisions as a result of the upcoming rulemaking
and changes to economic assumptions when the modification is executed.
Consistent with Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017), we have estimated that this proposed rule will result in cost
savings. Therefore, this proposed rule would be considered an Executive
Order 13771 deregulatory action.
Accounting Statement
In evaluating whether a regulation is economically significant, a
key consideration is whether the annual effect in any given year is
over $100 million. To evaluate this, the Department looked at the
difference in the undiscounted cashflows related to the death,
disability, and bankruptcy (DDB) claims in which borrower defense
claims are included for the one-year delay established in the IFR and
the further one-year delay scenario described under Net Budget Impacts.
The difference from subtracting the further delay scenario from the IFR
one-year delay scenario for the 2017 to 2019 cohorts is summarized in
Table 2.
Table 2--Difference in Undiscounted Net Cashflows for the 2017 to 2019 Loan Cohorts From the Further One-Year
Delay in 2016 Borrower Defense Rule to July 1, 2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change in DDB Cashflow.......... 159 7,489 496,637 637,361 538,468
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change in DDB Cashflow.......... 6,004,802 9,525,520 4,668,143 2,156,009 3,003,657
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3 shows the effects when those differences in the DDB
cashflows are discounted at 7 and 3 percent and annualized.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Benefits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Institutions may not incur compliance
costs or costs of obtaining financial
protection until the rule is in effect. Not Quantified
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7% 3%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continued use of State-law based
standard Not Quantified
Delay in providing consumer information
about institution's performance and
practices
Potential decreased awareness and usage
of closed school and false
certification discharges
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Savings associated with delay in -9.5 -9.51
compliance with paperwork requirements.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Transfers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7% 3%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reduction in transfers from the Federal -3.5 -3.8
Government to affected borrowers in the
2017 to 2019 cohorts that would have
been partially borne by affected
institutions via reimbursements........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reduced reimbursements from affected -1.2 -1.3
institutions to affected students, via
the Federal government as loan cohorts
2017 to 2019 are subject to the
existing borrower defense regulation...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delay in closed school automatic -14.8 -14.8
discharge implementation from 2018 to
2019...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 49160]]
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
As indicated in the Paperwork Reduction Act section published in
the final regulations, the assessed estimated burden was 253,136 hours,
affecting both institutions and individuals, with an estimated annual
cost of $9,458,484. The table below identifies the regulatory sections,
OMB Control Numbers, estimated burden hours, and estimated costs of the
final regulations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated cost
$36.55/hour
Regulatory section OMB Control No. Burden hours institution
$16.30/hour
individual
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
668.14............................. 1845-0022 1,953................................ 71,382
668.41............................. 1845-0004 5,346................................ 195,396
668.171............................ 1845-0022 3,028................................ 110,673
668.175............................ 1845-0022 60,560............................... 2,213,468
682.211............................ 1845-0020 5,784................................ 211,405
682.402............................ 1845-0020 1,838................................ 67,179
685.222............................ 1845-0142 249 (Individuals).................... 4,059
685.222............................ 1845-0142 800 (Institutions)................... 29,240
685.300............................ 1845-0143 179,362.............................. 6,555,681
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Total.......................... ................. 258,920.............................. 9,458,484
Cost savings due to delayed ................. 253,136.............................. 9,247,079
effective date excluding 682.211
early implementation allowed.
Burden remaining................... ................. 5,784................................ 211,405
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice of proposed rulemaking delays the effective date of the
implementation of all of the cited regulations and would result in a
cost savings of the total amount of $9,458,484. However, Sec.
682.211(i)(7) of the final regulations, regarding mandatory forbearance
based on a borrower defense claim, with an estimated 5,784 hours and
$211,405 cost, as would continue to be designated for early
implementation. Lenders may have elected early implementation and,
therefore, those specific costs and hours remain applicable and have
been subtracted from the overall estimated cost saving. Based on the
delayed effective date of July 1, 2019, the revised estimated annual
cost savings to institutions and individuals is $9,247,079 ($9,458,484
- $211,405) with an estimated burden hours savings of 253,136 (258,920
- 5,784).
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities may obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to this Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site, you can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or PDF. To use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat
Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
List of Subjects
34 CFR Part 668
Administrative practice and procedure, Colleges and universities,
Consumer protection, Grant programs--education, Loan programs--
education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Selective Service
System, Student aid, Vocational education.
34 CFR Part 674
Loan programs--education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Student aid.
34 CFR Parts 682 and 685
Administrative practice and procedure, Colleges and universities,
Loan programs--education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Student aid, Vocational education.
Dated: October 16, 2017.
Betsy DeVos,
Secretary of Education.
[FR Doc. 2017-22850 Filed 10-20-17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P