Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 723 and Rule 1614, 48542-48545 [2017-22538]

Download as PDF 48542 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 18, 2017 / Notices States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 51 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018–10, CP2018–17. Elizabeth A. Reed, Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law. [FR Doc. 2017–22585 Filed 10–17–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P Elizabeth A. Reed, Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law. POSTAL SERVICE Product Change—Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement [FR Doc. 2017–22584 Filed 10–17–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P Postal ServiceTM. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 13, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 370 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018–9, CP2018–16. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: POSTAL SERVICE The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): October 18, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 13, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 59 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018–11, CP2018–18. SUMMARY: Elizabeth A. Reed, Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law. [FR Doc. 2017–22586 Filed 10–17–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P POSTAL SERVICE Product Change—Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement Postal Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): October 18, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 13, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 60 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018–12, CP2018–19. SUMMARY: [FR Doc. 2017–22587 Filed 10–17–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P Postal ServiceTM. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: POSTAL SERVICE The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): October 18, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179. ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Oct 17, 2017 Jkt 244001 Product Change—Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement Postal ServiceTM. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00067 Elizabeth A. Reed, Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law. [FR Doc. 2017–22583 Filed 10–17–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P ServiceTM. Elizabeth A. Reed, Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law. Product Change—Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. DATES: Date of notice required under 39 U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): October 18, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 13, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 369 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018–8, CP2018–15. Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–81863; File No. SR–ISE– 2017–86] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 723 and Rule 1614 October 12, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on October 2, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 723 (Price Improvement Mechanism for Crossing Transactions) and Rule 1614 (Imposition of Fines for Minor Rule Violations) to remove obsolete rule text. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. 1 15 2 17 E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 18OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 18, 2017 / Notices II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 723 (Price Improvement Mechanism for Crossing Transactions) and Rule 1614 (Imposition of Fines for Minor Rule Violations) to remove obsolete rule text. Rule 723 sets forth the requirements for the PIM, which was adopted in 2004 as a price-improvement mechanism on the Exchange.3 Certain aspects of PIM were adopted on a pilot basis (‘‘Pilot’’); specifically, the termination of the exposure period by unrelated orders, and no minimum size requirement of orders eligible for PIM. The Pilot expired on January 18, 2017. On December 12, 2016, the Exchange filed with the Commission a proposed rule change to make the Pilot permanent, and also to change the requirements for providing price improvement for Agency Orders of less than 50 option contracts (other than auctions involving Complex Orders) where the National Best Bid and Offer (‘‘NBBO’’) is only $0.01 wide.4 The ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50819 (December 8, 2004), 69 FR 75093 (December 15, 2004) (SR–ISE–2003–06). 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79530 (December 12, 2016), 81 FR 91221 (December 16, 2017) (SR–ISE–2016–29). The Exchange notes that, on April 3, 2017, International Securities Exchange, LLC was re-named Nasdaq ISE, LLC to reflect its new placement within the Nasdaq, Inc. corporate structure in connection with the March 9, 2016 acquisition by Nasdaq of the capital stock of U.S. Exchange Holdings, and the indirect acquisition all of the interests of the International Securities Exchange, LLC, ISE Gemini, LLC and ISE Mercury, LLC. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80325 (March 29, 2017), 82 FR 16445 (April 4, 2017) (SR–ISE–2017–25). ISE Gemini, LLC and ISE Mercury, LLC were also renamed Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’) and Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’), respectively. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80248 (March 15, 2017), 82 FR 14547 (March 21, 2017) (SR–ISEGemini–2017–13); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80326 (March 29, 2017), VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Oct 17, 2017 Jkt 244001 Commission approved this proposal on January 18, 2017.5 In modifying the requirements for price improvement for Agency Orders of less than 50 contracts, ISE proposed to amend Rule 723(b) to require Electronic Access Members to provide at least $0.01 price improvement for an Agency Order if that order is for less than 50 contracts and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01. ISE adopted a member conduct standard to implement this requirement during the time pursuant to which ISE symbols were migrating from the ISE platform to the Nasdaq INET platform. At the time it proposed the member conduct standard, ISE anticipated that the migration to the Nasdaq platform would be complete on or before July 15, 2017. Accordingly, Rule 723(b) stated that, for the period beginning January 19, 2017 until a date specified by the Exchange in a Regulatory Information Circular, which date shall be no later than July 15, 2017, if the Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01, an Electronic Access Member shall not enter a Crossing Transaction unless such Crossing Transaction is entered at a price that is one minimum price improvement increment better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the market from the Agency Order, and better than any limit order on the limit order book on the same side of the market as the Agency Order. This requirement applied regardless of whether the Agency Order is for the account of a public customer, or where the Agency Order is for the account of a broker dealer or any other person or entity that is not a Public Customer. To enforce this requirement, ISE also amended Rule 1614 (Imposition of Fines for Minor Rule Violations). Specifically, ISE added Rule 1614(d)(4), which provides that any Member who enters an order into PIM for less than 50 contracts, while the National Best Bid or Offer spread is $0.01, must provide price improvement of at least one minimum price improvement increment better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the market from the Agency Order, which increment may not be smaller than $0.01. Failure to provide such price improvement will result in members being subject to the following fines: $500 for the second offense, $1,000 for the third offense, and $2,500 for the fourth offense. Subsequent 82 FR 16460 (April 4, 2017) (SR–ISEMercury–2017– 05). 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79829 (January 18, 2017), 82 FR 8469 (January 25, 2017) (SR–ISE–2016–29). PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 48543 offenses will subject the member to formal disciplinary action. The Exchange will review violations on a monthly cycle to assess these violations. This provision was to be in effect for the period beginning January 19, 2017 until a date specified by the Exchange in a Regulatory Information Circular, which date shall be no later than until September 15, 2017.6 In adopting the price improvement requirement for Agency Orders of less than 50 contracts, the Exchange also proposed to amend Rule 723(b) to adopt a systems-based mechanism to implement this requirement, which shall be effective following the migration of a symbol to the Nasdaq INET platform. Under this provision, if the Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01, the Crossing Transaction must be entered at one minimum price improvement increment better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the market from the Agency Order and better than the limit order or quote on the ISE order book on the same side of the Agency Order. Subsequent to the approval of the rule change adopting the price improvement requirement and the member conduct standard, the Exchange determined that the migration of symbols to the Nasdaq INET platform would be complete on or before July 31, 2017.7 This new migration schedule was developed to enable the Exchange to conduct additional systems testing prior to symbol migration. Given the updated migration schedule, the Exchange proposed to extend the effective period of the member conduct standard accordingly until a date specific by the Exchange in a Regulatory Circular, which would be no later than August 15, 2017.8 6 While ISE anticipated that the migration of ISE symbols to the Nasdaq INET platform would be complete by July 15, 2017, and its member conduct standard could be eliminated accordingly by that time, ISE Mercury, LLC (now Nasdaq MRX, LLC) also filed a rule change that adopted a similar member conduct standard for its price improvement rule, and that referenced proposed ISE Rule 1614(d)(4) as the means for enforcing its member conduct standard. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79841 (January 18, 2017), 82 FR 8452 (January 25, 2017) (order approving SR– ISEMercury–2016–25). The Nasdaq MRX replatforming was scheduled to occur after the ISE replatforming was complete. Accordingly, ISE proposed that the date for eliminating Rule 1614(d)(4) shall be specified by the Exchange in a Regulatory Information Circular, which date shall be no later than until September 15, 2017. 7 See Data Technical News #2017–14 (May 25, 2017). 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81212 (July 26, 2017), 82 FR 35864 (August 1, 2017) (SR– ISE–2017–75). E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM 18OCN1 48544 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 18, 2017 / Notices By August 15, 2017, ISE had completed the migration of symbols to the Nasdaq INET platform, and adopted the corresponding systems-based mechanism for enforcing the price improvement requirement where the Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01.9 Accordingly, ISE now proposes to delete the rule text in Rule 723 that implements the member conduct standard and the corresponding provision in Rule 1614 that imposes fines for violations of the member conduct standard. ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,10 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,11 in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes this proposal is consistent with the Act because it removes language that implements the member conduct standard where the Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01, and the corresponding provision in Rule 1614 that imposes fines for violations of this member conduct standard. As noted above, these provisions have become obsolete, given the migration of all symbols on ISE, GEMX and MRX to the Nasdaq INET system and the corresponding adoption of the systemsbased mechanism on each exchange for enforcing this price improvement requirement. The Exchange also notes that the systems-based mechanism for enforcing this price improvement requirement was previously approved by the Commission.12 B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as the rule text to be removed has become obsolete with the migration of all symbols to the Nasdaq INET system and the corresponding adoption of the systemsbased mechanism for enforcing the price 9 As of the date of filing, GEMX and MRX had also completed the process of migrating their symbols to the Nasdaq INET platform. 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 12 See supra note 6. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Oct 17, 2017 Jkt 244001 improvement requirement where the Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 13 and Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) thereunder.14 A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the Act 15 normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date of its filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 16 permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed rule change may become operative upon filing. The Exchange states that waiver of the operative delay will allow the Exchange to remove the obsolete rule text immediately, minimizing potential investor confusion. The Commission believes the waiver of the operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.17 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such 13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 17 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 14 17 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– ISE–2017–86 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–ISE–2017–86. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–ISE– E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM 18OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 18, 2017 / Notices 2017–86, and should be submitted on or before November 8, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.18 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017–22538 Filed 10–17–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [SEC File No. 270–574, OMB Control No. 3235–0648] Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–2736 ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Extension: Rule 498 Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) a request for extension of the previously approved collection of information discussed below. Rule 498 (17 CFR 230.498) under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) (‘‘Securities Act’’) permits openend management investment companies (‘‘funds’’) to satisfy their prospectus delivery obligations under the Securities Act by sending or giving key information directly to investors in the form of a summary prospectus (‘‘Summary Prospectus’’) and providing the statutory prospectus on a Web site. Upon an investor’s request, funds are also required to send the statutory prospectus to the investor. In addition, under rule 498, a fund that relies on the rule to meet its statutory prospectus delivery obligations must make available, free of charge, the fund’s current Summary Prospectus, statutory prospectus, statement of additional information, and most recent annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders at the Web site address specified in the required Summary Prospectus legend.1 A Summary Prospectus that complies with rule 498 is deemed to be a prospectus that is authorized under Section 10(b) of the Securities Act and Section 24(g) of the Investment 18 17 1 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). CFR 270.498(e)(1). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Oct 17, 2017 Jkt 244001 Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.). The purpose of rule 498 is to enable a fund to provide investors with a Summary Prospectus containing key information necessary to evaluate an investment in the fund. Unlike many other federal information collections, which are primarily for the use and benefit of the collecting agency, this information collection is primarily for the use and benefit of investors. The information filed with the Commission also permits the verification of compliance with securities law requirements and assures the public availability and dissemination of the information. Based on an analysis of fund filings, the Commission estimates that approximately 10,532 portfolios are using a Summary Prospectus. The Commission estimates that the annual hourly burden per portfolio associated with the compilation of the information required on the cover page or the beginning of the Summary Prospectus is 0.5 hours, and estimates that the annual hourly burden per portfolio to comply with the Web site posting requirement is approximately 1 hour, requiring a total of 1.5 hours per portfolio per year.2 Thus the total annual hour burden associated with these requirements of the rule is approximately 15,798.3 The Commission estimates that the annual cost burden is approximately $15,900 per portfolio, for a total annual cost burden of approximately $167,458,800.4 Estimates of the average burden hours are made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act and are not derived from a comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the costs of Commission rules and forms. Under rule 498, use of the Summary Prospectus is voluntary, but the rule’s requirements regarding provision of the statutory prospectus upon investor request are mandatory for funds that elect to send or give a Summary Prospectus in reliance upon rule 498. The information provided under rule 498 will not be kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it 2 0.5 hours per portfolio + 1 hour per portfolio = 1.5 hours per portfolio. The Commission believes that funds that have opted to use the Summary Prospectus have already incurred the estimated one-time hour burden to initially comply with rule 498, and therefore the estimated burden hours to initially comply with rule 498 and the associated costs are not included in these estimates. 3 1.5 hours per portfolio × 10,532 portfolios = 15,798 hours. 4 $15,900 per portfolio × 9,082 portfolios = $144,403,800. PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 48545 displays a currently valid OMB control number. The public may view the background documentation for this information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to: Shagufta_ Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@ sec.gov. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice. October 12, 2017. Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017–22542 Filed 10–17–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–81859; File No. SR– BatsEDGA–2017–26] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Certain Rules To Add New Optional Functionality to Orders With a Minimum Quantity Instruction October 12, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on October 5, 2017, Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders it effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 2 17 E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM 18OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48542-48545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22538]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81863; File No. SR-ISE-2017-86]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 723 
and Rule 1614

October 12, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on October 2, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II 
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission 
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule 
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 723 (Price Improvement 
Mechanism for Crossing Transactions) and Rule 1614 (Imposition of Fines 
for Minor Rule Violations) to remove obsolete rule text.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

[[Page 48543]]

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 723 (Price Improvement 
Mechanism for Crossing Transactions) and Rule 1614 (Imposition of Fines 
for Minor Rule Violations) to remove obsolete rule text.
    Rule 723 sets forth the requirements for the PIM, which was adopted 
in 2004 as a price-improvement mechanism on the Exchange.\3\ Certain 
aspects of PIM were adopted on a pilot basis (``Pilot''); specifically, 
the termination of the exposure period by unrelated orders, and no 
minimum size requirement of orders eligible for PIM. The Pilot expired 
on January 18, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50819 (December 8, 
2004), 69 FR 75093 (December 15, 2004) (SR-ISE-2003-06).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 12, 2016, the Exchange filed with the Commission a 
proposed rule change to make the Pilot permanent, and also to change 
the requirements for providing price improvement for Agency Orders of 
less than 50 option contracts (other than auctions involving Complex 
Orders) where the National Best Bid and Offer (``NBBO'') is only $0.01 
wide.\4\ The Commission approved this proposal on January 18, 2017.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79530 (December 12, 
2016), 81 FR 91221 (December 16, 2017) (SR-ISE-2016-29). The 
Exchange notes that, on April 3, 2017, International Securities 
Exchange, LLC was re-named Nasdaq ISE, LLC to reflect its new 
placement within the Nasdaq, Inc. corporate structure in connection 
with the March 9, 2016 acquisition by Nasdaq of the capital stock of 
U.S. Exchange Holdings, and the indirect acquisition all of the 
interests of the International Securities Exchange, LLC, ISE Gemini, 
LLC and ISE Mercury, LLC. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
80325 (March 29, 2017), 82 FR 16445 (April 4, 2017) (SR-ISE-2017-
25). ISE Gemini, LLC and ISE Mercury, LLC were also renamed Nasdaq 
GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'') and Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX''), respectively. 
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80248 (March 15, 2017), 82 
FR 14547 (March 21, 2017) (SR-ISEGemini-2017-13); Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 80326 (March 29, 2017), 82 FR 16460 (April 
4, 2017) (SR-ISEMercury-2017-05).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79829 (January 18, 
2017), 82 FR 8469 (January 25, 2017) (SR-ISE-2016-29).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In modifying the requirements for price improvement for Agency 
Orders of less than 50 contracts, ISE proposed to amend Rule 723(b) to 
require Electronic Access Members to provide at least $0.01 price 
improvement for an Agency Order if that order is for less than 50 
contracts and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01.
    ISE adopted a member conduct standard to implement this requirement 
during the time pursuant to which ISE symbols were migrating from the 
ISE platform to the Nasdaq INET platform. At the time it proposed the 
member conduct standard, ISE anticipated that the migration to the 
Nasdaq platform would be complete on or before July 15, 2017. 
Accordingly, Rule 723(b) stated that, for the period beginning January 
19, 2017 until a date specified by the Exchange in a Regulatory 
Information Circular, which date shall be no later than July 15, 2017, 
if the Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the 
difference between the NBBO is $0.01, an Electronic Access Member shall 
not enter a Crossing Transaction unless such Crossing Transaction is 
entered at a price that is one minimum price improvement increment 
better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the market from the Agency 
Order, and better than any limit order on the limit order book on the 
same side of the market as the Agency Order. This requirement applied 
regardless of whether the Agency Order is for the account of a public 
customer, or where the Agency Order is for the account of a broker 
dealer or any other person or entity that is not a Public Customer.
    To enforce this requirement, ISE also amended Rule 1614 (Imposition 
of Fines for Minor Rule Violations). Specifically, ISE added Rule 
1614(d)(4), which provides that any Member who enters an order into PIM 
for less than 50 contracts, while the National Best Bid or Offer spread 
is $0.01, must provide price improvement of at least one minimum price 
improvement increment better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the 
market from the Agency Order, which increment may not be smaller than 
$0.01. Failure to provide such price improvement will result in members 
being subject to the following fines: $500 for the second offense, 
$1,000 for the third offense, and $2,500 for the fourth offense. 
Subsequent offenses will subject the member to formal disciplinary 
action. The Exchange will review violations on a monthly cycle to 
assess these violations. This provision was to be in effect for the 
period beginning January 19, 2017 until a date specified by the 
Exchange in a Regulatory Information Circular, which date shall be no 
later than until September 15, 2017.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ While ISE anticipated that the migration of ISE symbols to 
the Nasdaq INET platform would be complete by July 15, 2017, and its 
member conduct standard could be eliminated accordingly by that 
time, ISE Mercury, LLC (now Nasdaq MRX, LLC) also filed a rule 
change that adopted a similar member conduct standard for its price 
improvement rule, and that referenced proposed ISE Rule 1614(d)(4) 
as the means for enforcing its member conduct standard. See 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79841 (January 18, 2017), 82 FR 
8452 (January 25, 2017) (order approving SR-ISEMercury-2016-25). The 
Nasdaq MRX re-platforming was scheduled to occur after the ISE re-
platforming was complete. Accordingly, ISE proposed that the date 
for eliminating Rule 1614(d)(4) shall be specified by the Exchange 
in a Regulatory Information Circular, which date shall be no later 
than until September 15, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In adopting the price improvement requirement for Agency Orders of 
less than 50 contracts, the Exchange also proposed to amend Rule 723(b) 
to adopt a systems-based mechanism to implement this requirement, which 
shall be effective following the migration of a symbol to the Nasdaq 
INET platform. Under this provision, if the Agency Order is for less 
than 50 option contracts, and if the difference between the NBBO is 
$0.01, the Crossing Transaction must be entered at one minimum price 
improvement increment better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the 
market from the Agency Order and better than the limit order or quote 
on the ISE order book on the same side of the Agency Order.
    Subsequent to the approval of the rule change adopting the price 
improvement requirement and the member conduct standard, the Exchange 
determined that the migration of symbols to the Nasdaq INET platform 
would be complete on or before July 31, 2017.\7\ This new migration 
schedule was developed to enable the Exchange to conduct additional 
systems testing prior to symbol migration. Given the updated migration 
schedule, the Exchange proposed to extend the effective period of the 
member conduct standard accordingly until a date specific by the 
Exchange in a Regulatory Circular, which would be no later than August 
15, 2017.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Data Technical News #2017-14 (May 25, 2017).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81212 (July 26, 
2017), 82 FR 35864 (August 1, 2017) (SR-ISE-2017-75).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 48544]]

    By August 15, 2017, ISE had completed the migration of symbols to 
the Nasdaq INET platform, and adopted the corresponding systems-based 
mechanism for enforcing the price improvement requirement where the 
Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the 
difference between the NBBO is $0.01.\9\ Accordingly, ISE now proposes 
to delete the rule text in Rule 723 that implements the member conduct 
standard and the corresponding provision in Rule 1614 that imposes 
fines for violations of the member conduct standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ As of the date of filing, GEMX and MRX had also completed 
the process of migrating their symbols to the Nasdaq INET platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\10\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in particular, in that it is designed to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments 
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public 
interest. The Exchange believes this proposal is consistent with the 
Act because it removes language that implements the member conduct 
standard where the Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, 
and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01, and the corresponding 
provision in Rule 1614 that imposes fines for violations of this member 
conduct standard. As noted above, these provisions have become 
obsolete, given the migration of all symbols on ISE, GEMX and MRX to 
the Nasdaq INET system and the corresponding adoption of the systems-
based mechanism on each exchange for enforcing this price improvement 
requirement. The Exchange also notes that the systems-based mechanism 
for enforcing this price improvement requirement was previously 
approved by the Commission.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \12\ See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as the rule text to be removed 
has become obsolete with the migration of all symbols to the Nasdaq 
INET system and the corresponding adoption of the systems-based 
mechanism for enforcing the price improvement requirement where the 
Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the 
difference between the NBBO is $0.01.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect 
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any 
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the 
Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written 
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a 
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least 
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule 
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the 
Act \15\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date 
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \16\ permits the 
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent 
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange 
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that 
the proposed rule change may become operative upon filing. The Exchange 
states that waiver of the operative delay will allow the Exchange to 
remove the obsolete rule text immediately, minimizing potential 
investor confusion. The Commission believes the waiver of the operative 
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public 
interest. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay 
and designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \17\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-ISE-2017-86 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-86. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-

[[Page 48545]]

2017-86, and should be submitted on or before November 8, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-22538 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.