Certain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof Including Control Systems, Controllers, Visualization Hardware, Motion and Motor Control Systems, Networking Equipment, Safety Devices, and Power Supplies; Institution of Investigation, 48113-48115 [2017-22267]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 198 / Monday, October 16, 2017 / Notices States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that there is no reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or that the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of titanium sponge from Japan and Kazakhstan, provided for in subheading 8108.20.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’) and to be subsidized by the government of Kazakhstan. ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Background On August 24, 2017, Titanium Metals Corporation, Exton, PA, filed a petition with the Commission and the U.S. Department of Commerce, alleging that an industry in the United States is materially injured and threatened with material injury by reason of LTFV imports of titanium sponge from Japan and Kazakhstan and subsidized imports of titanium sponge from Kazakhstan. Accordingly, effective August 24, 2017, the Commission, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)), instituted countervailing duty investigation No. 701–TA–587 and antidumping duty investigation Nos. 731–TA–1385–1386 (Preliminary). Notice of the institution of the Commission’s investigations and of a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register of September 1, 2017 (82 FR 41656). The conference was held in Washington, DC, on September 14, 2017, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It completed and filed its determinations in these investigations on October 10, 2017. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4736 (October 2017), entitled Titanium Sponge from Japan and Kazakhstan: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–587 and 731–TA–1385– 1386 (Preliminary). By order of the Commission. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:59 Oct 13, 2017 Jkt 244001 Issued: October 10, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Investigation Nos. 731–TA–847 and 849 (Third Review). [FR Doc. 2017–22266 Filed 10–13–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P BILLING CODE 7020–02–P [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–847 and 849 (Third Review)] Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe From Japan and Romania Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in these subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Japan and Romania would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.2 Background The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews on September 1, 2016 (81 FR 60383) and determined on December 5, 2016 that it would conduct full reviews (81 FR 91199, December 16, 2017). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on April 5, 2017 (82 FR 16621). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on August 8, 2017, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on October 10, 2017. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4731 (October 2017), entitled Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Japan and Romania: 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner Broadbent dissenting with respect to the antidumping duty order on subject imports from Romania. Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 By order of the Commission. Issued: October 11, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–22318 Filed 10–13–17; 8:45 am] INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION PO 00000 48113 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1074] Certain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof Including Control Systems, Controllers, Visualization Hardware, Motion and Motor Control Systems, Networking Equipment, Safety Devices, and Power Supplies; Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on September 6, 2017, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Rockwell Automation, Inc. of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. A supplement to the complaint was filed on September 29, 2017. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain industrial automation systems and components thereof including control systems, controllers, visualization hardware, motion and motor control systems, networking equipment, safety devices, and power supplies, by reason of infringement of U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 1,172,995 (‘‘the ’995 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 696,401 (‘‘the ’401 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 693,780 (‘‘the ’780 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 1,172,994 (‘‘the ’994 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 712,800 (‘‘the ’800 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 712,836 (‘‘the ’836 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 2,510,226 (‘‘the ’226 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 2,671,196 (‘‘the ’196 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 2,701,786 (‘‘the ’786 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 2,412,742 (‘‘the ’742 trademark’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008389890 (‘‘the ’890 copyright’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008389887 (‘‘the ’887 copyright’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390098 (‘‘the ’098 copyright)’’; U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390094 (‘‘the ’094 copyright’’); U.S. Copyright SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM 16OCN1 48114 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 198 / Monday, October 16, 2017 / Notices Reg. No. TX0008390077 (‘‘the ’077 copyright’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390088 (‘‘the ’088 copyright’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390116 (‘‘the ’116 copyright’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390084 (‘‘the ’084 copyright’’); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390111 (‘‘the ’111 copyright’’); and U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390091 (‘‘the ’091 copyright’’). The complaint also alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The Complaint further alleges a violation of Section 337 based on unfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the importation or sale of certain industrial automation systems and components thereof including control systems, controllers, visualization hardware, motion and motor control systems, networking equipment, safety devices, and power supplies, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. ADDRESSES: ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:59 Oct 13, 2017 Jkt 244001 Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on October 6, 2017, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine: (a) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain industrial automation systems and components thereof including control systems, controllers, visualization hardware, motion and motor control systems, networking equipment, safety devices, and power supplies, by reason of infringement of the ’995 trademark; the ’401 trademark; the ’780 trademark; the ’994 trademark; the ’800 trademark; the ’836 trademark; the ’226 trademark; the ’196 trademark; the ’786 trademark; and the ’742 trademark; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (b) whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain industrial automation systems and components thereof including control systems, controllers, visualization hardware, motion and motor control systems, networking equipment, safety devices, and power supplies, by reason of infringement of the ’890 copyright; the ’887 copyright; the ’098 copyright; the ’094 copyright; the ’077 copyright; the ’088 copyright; the ’116 copyright; and the ’111 copyright; and (c) whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) in the importation or sale of certain industrial automation systems and components thereof including control systems, controllers, visualization hardware, motion and motor control systems, networking equipment, safety devices, and power supplies, by reason of unfair methods of competitions and unfair acts, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States; (2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the presiding Administrative Law Judge shall take evidence or other information and hear arguments from the parties or other interested persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Rockwell Automation, Inc., 1201 South 2nd Street, Milwaukee, WI 53204–2410. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Can Electric Limited, No. 2 Danan Rd, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510115, China Capnil (HK) Company Limited, Unit 603 6/F Koon Wah Mirrow, Factory 3 Ind Bldg 5–9 Ka Hing, Rd Kln Hk, Hong Kong Fractioni (Hongkong) Ltd., #327 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China Fujian Dahong Trade Co., Ltd, A15– 2303 Taihongyu Pushang Road, Cangshan Fuzhou Fujian, Fujian 350008, China GreySolution Limited d/b/a Fibica, Unit B601, 6/F Block A, Universal Ind. Ctr., 19–25 Shan Mei St Sha Tin, Fo Tan, Hong Kong Huang Wei Feng d/b/a A–O–M Industry, Room 201 No. 55 2 Qu, Tangshuiwei, Minzhi, Longhua, Boa’An, Shenzhen 511700, China KBS Electronics Suzhou Co, Ltd., Block 7&43, No. 328 Hengyong Road, Jiading district, Shanghai, China, 201806 PLC–VIP Shop d/b/a VIP Tech Limited, 95 Fuk Wing Street, Cheung Sha Wan, Kowloon, Hong Kong Radwell International, Inc. d/b/a PLC Center, 1 Millennium Drive, Willingboro, NJ 08046 Shanghai EuoSource Electronic Co., Ltd, Block 43, No. 328, Hengyong Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, China 201806 ShenZhen T-Tide Trading co., Ltd., Room A–60S, Block.lexi., Minle Industrial Park, Mei Ban Road, Longhua District, Shenzhen 518031, China SoBuy Commercial (HK) Co. Limited, Flat B G/F Yeung Yiu Chung (No. 6), Ind. Bldg. No. 19 Cheung Shun Street, Lai Chi Kok Kowloon, Hong Kong Suzhou Yi Micro Optical Co., Ltd., d/b/a Suzhou Yiwei Guangxue Youxiangongsi, d/b/a Easy Microoptics Co. LTD., Office Building 5F, 91 Weixin Rd, Suzhou, SIP, Jiangsu, China, 215021 Wenzhou Sparker Group Co. Ltd., d/b/a Sparker Instruments, Room 503, Oujiang Masion, Wenzhou Road, Wenzhou, 325000, China E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM 16OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 198 / Monday, October 16, 2017 / Notices Yaspro Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Room 1808E, No. 488, Vaohua Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, China (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. Administration (MSHA) by the parties listed below. DATES: All comments on the petitions must be received by MSHA’s Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before November 15, 2017. ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by ‘‘docket number’’ on the subject line, by any of the following methods: 1. Electronic Mail: zzMSHAcomments@dol.gov. Include the docket number of the petition in the subject line of the message. 2. Facsimile: 202–693–9441. 3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: MSHA, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington, Virginia 22202–5452, Attention: Sheila McConnell, Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. Persons delivering documents are required to check in at the receptionist’s desk in Suite 4E401. Individuals may inspect copies of the petition and comments during normal business hours at the address listed above. MSHA will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Barron, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances at 202–693– 9447 (Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov (Email), or 202–693–9441 (Facsimile). [These are not toll-free numbers.] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 44 govern the application, processing, and disposition of petitions for modification. By order of the Commission. Issued: October 10, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. I. Background Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard to a coal or other mine if the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) determines that: 1. An alternative method of achieving the result of such standard exists which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or 2. That the application of such standard to such mine will result in a diminution of safety to the miners in such mine. In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modification. [FR Doc. 2017–22267 Filed 10–13–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Mine Safety and Health Administration ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standards Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: This notice is a summary of petitions for modification submitted to the Mine Safety and Health SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:59 Oct 13, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 48115 II. Petitions for Modification Docket Number: M–2017–017–C. Petitioner: Paramont Contura, LLC, Three Gateway Center, 401 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222–1000. Mine: Deep Mine 44, MSHA I.D. No. 44–07308, located in Dickenson County, Virginia. Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1700 (Oil and gas wells). Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard to permit an alternative method of compliance with respect to gas wells. The petitioner proposes to plug and mine through vertically drilled gas wells. The petitioner states that: The following alternative methods will be used when mining through vertically drilled degasification boreholes with horizontal laterals to permit mining through the boreholes. a. The petition will apply to all wells being mined through located within the mineable reserve at Paramount Coal Company’s Deep Mine 44. b. District Manager approval is required for the following proposed alternative methods: (1) A safety barrier of 300 feet in diameter (150 between any mined area and a well) will be maintained around all wells (defined herein to include all active, inactive, abandoned, shut-in, and previously plugged oil and gas wells, and including water injection wells) until approval to proceed with mining has been obtained from the District Manager (DM). Wells that were drilled into potential oil or gas producing formations that did not produce commercial quantities of either gas or oil (wildcat wells or dry holes) are also defined as oil or gas wells. (2) Prior to mining within the safety barrier around any well that is intended to be mined through, the mine operator will provide the DM a sworn affidavit or declaration executed by a company official stating that all mandatory procedures for cleaning out, preparing, and plugging each gas or oil well have been completed as described by the terms and conditions of this petition. The affidavit or declaration must be accompanied by all logs described below and any other records described in those subparagraphs which the DM may request. The DM will review the affidavit or declaration, the logs, and other records that have been requested, and may inspect the well. The DM will determine if the operator has complied with the procedures for cleaning, preparing, and plugging each well as described by the terms and conditions of this petition. If the DM determines E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM 16OCN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48113-48115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22267]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1074]


Certain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof 
Including Control Systems, Controllers, Visualization Hardware, Motion 
and Motor Control Systems, Networking Equipment, Safety Devices, and 
Power Supplies; Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 6, 2017, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Rockwell 
Automation, Inc. of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. A supplement to the complaint 
was filed on September 29, 2017. The complaint alleges violations of 
section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale 
for importation, and the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain industrial automation systems and components 
thereof including control systems, controllers, visualization hardware, 
motion and motor control systems, networking equipment, safety devices, 
and power supplies, by reason of infringement of U.S. Trademark Reg. 
No. 1,172,995 (``the '995 trademark''); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 696,401 
(``the '401 trademark''); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 693,780 (``the '780 
trademark''); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 1,172,994 (``the '994 
trademark''); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 712,800 (``the '800 trademark''); 
U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 712,836 (``the '836 trademark''); U.S. 
Trademark Reg. No. 2,510,226 (``the '226 trademark''); U.S. Trademark 
Reg. No. 2,671,196 (``the '196 trademark''); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 
2,701,786 (``the '786 trademark''); U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 2,412,742 
(``the '742 trademark''); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008389890 (``the 
'890 copyright''); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008389887 (``the '887 
copyright''); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390098 (``the '098 
copyright)''; U.S. Copyright Reg. No. TX0008390094 (``the '094 
copyright''); U.S. Copyright

[[Page 48114]]

Reg. No. TX0008390077 (``the '077 copyright''); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. 
TX0008390088 (``the '088 copyright''); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. 
TX0008390116 (``the '116 copyright''); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. 
TX0008390084 (``the '084 copyright''); U.S. Copyright Reg. No. 
TX0008390111 (``the '111 copyright''); and U.S. Copyright Reg. No. 
TX0008390091 (``the '091 copyright''). The complaint also alleges that 
an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable 
Federal Statute. The Complaint further alleges a violation of Section 
337 based on unfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the 
importation or sale of certain industrial automation systems and 
components thereof including control systems, controllers, 
visualization hardware, motion and motor control systems, networking 
equipment, safety devices, and power supplies, the threat or effect of 
which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United 
States.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone (202) 205-2560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
19 U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).

    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on October 6, 2017, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine:
    (a) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 
337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain industrial automation systems and components thereof including 
control systems, controllers, visualization hardware, motion and motor 
control systems, networking equipment, safety devices, and power 
supplies, by reason of infringement of the '995 trademark; the '401 
trademark; the '780 trademark; the '994 trademark; the '800 trademark; 
the '836 trademark; the '226 trademark; the '196 trademark; the '786 
trademark; and the '742 trademark; and whether an industry in the 
United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (b) whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 
337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain industrial automation systems and components thereof including 
control systems, controllers, visualization hardware, motion and motor 
control systems, networking equipment, safety devices, and power 
supplies, by reason of infringement of the '890 copyright; the '887 
copyright; the '098 copyright; the '094 copyright; the '077 copyright; 
the '088 copyright; the '116 copyright; and the '111 copyright; and
    (c) whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) in the 
importation or sale of certain industrial automation systems and 
components thereof including control systems, controllers, 
visualization hardware, motion and motor control systems, networking 
equipment, safety devices, and power supplies, by reason of unfair 
methods of competitions and unfair acts, the threat or effect of which 
is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States;
    (2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), 
the presiding Administrative Law Judge shall take evidence or other 
information and hear arguments from the parties or other interested 
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as 
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a 
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the 
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), 
(f)(1), (g)(1);
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is: Rockwell Automation, Inc., 1201 South 2nd 
Street, Milwaukee, WI 53204-2410.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Can Electric Limited, No. 2 Danan Rd, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 
Guangdong, 510115, China
Capnil (HK) Company Limited, Unit 603 6/F Koon Wah Mirrow, Factory 3 
Ind Bldg 5-9 Ka Hing, Rd Kln Hk, Hong Kong
Fractioni (Hongkong) Ltd., #327 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China
Fujian Dahong Trade Co., Ltd, A15-2303 Taihongyu Pushang Road, Cangshan 
Fuzhou Fujian, Fujian 350008, China
GreySolution Limited d/b/a Fibica, Unit B601, 6/F Block A, Universal 
Ind. Ctr., 19-25 Shan Mei St Sha Tin, Fo Tan, Hong Kong
Huang Wei Feng d/b/a A-O-M Industry, Room 201 No. 55 2 Qu, Tangshuiwei, 
Minzhi, Longhua, Boa'An, Shenzhen 511700, China
KBS Electronics Suzhou Co, Ltd., Block 7&43, No. 328 Hengyong Road, 
Jiading district, Shanghai, China, 201806
PLC-VIP Shop d/b/a VIP Tech Limited, 95 Fuk Wing Street, Cheung Sha 
Wan, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Radwell International, Inc. d/b/a PLC Center, 1 Millennium Drive, 
Willingboro, NJ 08046
Shanghai EuoSource Electronic Co., Ltd, Block 43, No. 328, Hengyong 
Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, China 201806
ShenZhen T-Tide Trading co., Ltd., Room A-60S, Block.lexi., Minle 
Industrial Park, Mei Ban Road, Longhua District, Shenzhen 518031, China
SoBuy Commercial (HK) Co. Limited, Flat B G/F Yeung Yiu Chung (No. 6), 
Ind. Bldg. No. 19 Cheung Shun Street, Lai Chi Kok Kowloon, Hong Kong
Suzhou Yi Micro Optical Co., Ltd., d/b/a Suzhou Yiwei Guangxue 
Youxiangongsi, d/b/a Easy Micro-optics Co. LTD., Office Building 5F, 91 
Weixin Rd, Suzhou, SIP, Jiangsu, China, 215021
Wenzhou Sparker Group Co. Ltd., d/b/a Sparker Instruments, Room 503, 
Oujiang Masion, Wenzhou Road, Wenzhou, 325000, China

[[Page 48115]]

Yaspro Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Room 1808E, No. 488, Vaohua 
Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, China

    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; 
and
    (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 10, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-22267 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.