Comment Request, 47770-47772 [2017-22188]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
47770
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 197 / Friday, October 13, 2017 / Notices
Wheaton order.1 Specifically, the final
regulations continued to allow eligible
organizations to notify an issuer or third
party administrator using EBSA Form
700, as set forth in the July 2013 final
regulations. In addition, the final
regulations permitted an alternative
process, consistent with the Wheaton
order, under which an eligible
organization could notify the Secretary
of HHS that it will not act as the plan
administrator or claims administrator
with respect to, or contribute to the
funding of, coverage of all or a subset of
contraceptive services. The notification
must include information sufficient to
identify the plan, plan type (including
whether it is a church plan within the
meaning of ERISA section 3(33)), and
the identity and mailing addresses of
any third party administrators.
The 2017 interim final rules amend
the Departments’ July 2015 final
regulations to expand the exemption to
include additional entities (any kind of
non-governmental employer) and
persons that object based on religious
beliefs or moral convictions objecting to
contraceptive or sterilization coverage,
and by making the accommodation
compliance process optional for eligible
organizations instead of mandatory.
These rules leave in place HRSA’s
discretion to continue to require
contraceptive and sterilization coverage
where no objection exists, and to the
extent that PHS Act section 2713
otherwise applies. With respect to
employers, the expanded exemption in
these rules covers employers that have
religious beliefs or moral convictions
objecting to coverage of all or a subset
of contraceptives or sterilization and
related patient education and
counseling. While the rules cover any
kind of non-governmental employer but,
for the sake of clarity, these regulations
also include an illustrative list of
employers whose objection qualifies the
plans they sponsor for an exemption.
Consistent with the current
exemption, exempt entities will not be
required to comply with a selfcertification process. Although exempt
entities do not need to file notices or
certifications of their exemption,
existing rules governing health plans
require that a plan document specify
what is and is not covered. Thus where
an exemption applies and all or a subset
of contraception is omitted from a plan’s
coverage, the plan document and
otherwise applicable ERISA
1 The Supreme Court of the United States interim
order in connection with an application for an
injunction in the pending case of Wheaton College
v. Burwell (the ‘‘Wheaton order’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Oct 12, 2017
Jkt 244001
disclosures 2 should reflect the omission
of coverage. This is not an added
obligation, but it will serve to help
provide notice of what plans do and do
not cover.
As in the previous rule, institutions of
higher education that arrange student
health insurance coverage will continue
to be treated similar to the way
employers are treated for the purposes
of such plans being exempt. These
interim final rules also exempt group
health plans sponsored by an entity
other than an employer, and health
insurance issuers in the group and
individual market, that object based on
religious beliefs or moral convictions to
coverage of contraceptives or
sterilization. The rules also exempt
health coverage offered or provided to
certain individuals with their own
religious or moral objections.
Employers that under the previous
rules had used the accommodation
process, but can now be exempt may
now choose to revoke their use of the
accommodation process, but in order to
do so they must provide participants
and beneficiaries written notice of such
revocation as soon as possible.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approved the amendments to
EBSA Form 700 required as a revision
to OMB Control Number 1210–0150
under the emergency procedures for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35) and 5 CFR 1320.13. OMB’s approval
of the revision currently are schedule to
expire on September 30, 2018. In an
effort to consolidate the number of
information collection requests, the
Department is combining the burden
from 1210–0152 into 1210–0150. Once
this ICR is approved the Department
will discontinue. 1210–0152.
information collection unless it displays
a valid OMB control number. A
summary of the ICR and the current
burden estimates follows:
Type of Review: Revised Collection.
Agency: DOL–EBSA.
Title: Coverage of Certain Preventive
Services under the Affordable Care
Act—Private Sector.
OMB Numbers: 1210–0150.
Affected Public: Private Sector—Not
for profit and religious organizations;
businesses or other for profits.
Total Respondents: 114 (combined
with HHS total is 227).
Total Responses: 274,628 (combined
with HHS total is 549,255).
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 181 (combined with HHS total is
362 hours).
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
$68,662 (combined with HHS total is
$137,325).
II. Current Actions
This notice requests public comment
pertaining to the Department’s request
for extension of OMB’s approval of its
revision to EBSA Form 700. After
considering comments received in
response to this notice, the Department
intends to submit an ICR to OMB for
continuing approval. Changes to the
current ICR include an expansion to the
number of firms that qualify for the
exemption, making the accommodation
process optional, and requiring firms
that are revoking their current
accommodation to send a notice to plan
participants and beneficiaries. The
Department notes that an agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, an
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the ICR for OMB approval
of the extension of the information
collection; they will also become a
matter of public record.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
The Department of Labor
(Department) is particularly interested
in comments that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the information
will have practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions
used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to respond,
including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other
forms of information technology, e.g., by
permitting electronic submissions of
responses.
Dated: October 5, 2017.
Joseph S. Piacentini,
Director, Office of Policy and Research,
Employee Benefits Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017–22064 Filed 10–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Comment Request
Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Department of Labor.
AGENCY:
2 See,
PO 00000
e.g., 29 CFR 2520.104b–3(d).
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 197 / Friday, October 13, 2017 / Notices
Notice of solicitation of
comments.
ACTION:
The Department of Labor
through the Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS) is currently soliciting comments
for the second major revision of the
Occupational Injury and Illness
Classification System (OIICS), current
version 2.01. The last major revision
occurred in 2011. BLS is responsible for
the development and publication of
occupational injury, illness, and fatality
data. These data are compiled by the
Survey of Occupational Injuries and
Illnesses (SOII) and the Census of Fatal
Occupational Injuries (CFOI) programs.
The OIICS is used to classify certain
case characteristics associated with the
nonfatal and fatal work injury cases
received by the programs.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
Addresses section of this notice on or
before February 1, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Christen
Byler, Office of Safety, Health and
Working Conditions, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Room 3180, 2 Massachusetts
Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20212 or
by email to: OIICS-R@bls.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christen Byler, Office of Safety, Health
and Working Conditions, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, telephone number:
202–691–6252, or by email at:
Byler.Christen@bls.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
The Occupational Injury and Illness
Classification System is used to code
case characteristics of nonfatal injuries
and illnesses reported in the SOII and
fatal injuries reported in CFOI. Cases are
classified according to five code
structures that describe the injury or
illness and how it occurred:
• Nature of Injury or Illness:
Describes the physical characteristics of
the injury or illness.
• Part of Body Affected: Identifies the
part of the body directly affected by the
nature.
• Source of Injury or Illness:
Identifies the object or substance that
directly inflicted the injury or illness.
• Event or Exposure: Describes the
manner in which the injury or illness
was inflicted by the source.
• Secondary Source: Identifies other
objects or substances, if any, that
contributed to the event or exposure.
The same code list is used for both
source and secondary source.
The case characteristic classification
structures are hierarchical with four
levels of detail to facilitate the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Oct 12, 2017
Jkt 244001
aggregation of information and to
accommodate both variations in detail
available on reporting forms and the
needs of data users. For example, one
user may wish to look at data for
injuries involving all trucks (Source
code 825); whereas, another user may be
interested only in cases involving
tractor trailer trucks (Source code 8254).
With the 2011 adoption of OIICS 2.0,
the numeric hierarchy also became an
order of precedence within each of the
characteristics, designating which codes
should be given priority when multiple
codes could be appropriate within a
given case.
Each case characteristic structure is
comprised of the following:
• Rules of precedence: Designates
which division within the coded case
characteristic, Event or Exposure, is to
take precedence when more than one
code might be applicable within the
case.
• Rules of selection: Defines which
codes should be used and how different
coded case characteristics interact with
each other, specifically event/source/
secondary source and nature/part.
• Code descriptions: Provides
detailed definitions for individual code
categories and often gives examples of
types of cases that are included or
excluded from the category.
• Complete code list: Includes the
codes and associated titles by
themselves without the descriptions.
• Alphabetical indices.
The original Occupational Injury and
Illness Classification System (OIICS)
was released in December 1992. It was
developed by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics with input from data users and
states participating in the BLS
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH)
Federal/State cooperative programs. It
was ultimately based on the American
National Standards Institute (ANSI)
Z16.2–1962, Method of Recording Basic
Facts Relating to the Nature and
Occurrence of Work Injuries, revised
1969. In addition, certain portions are
based on the International Statistical
Classification of Diseases and Related
Health Problems, 9th Revision, Clinical
Modification (ICD–9 CM), which is
widely used in the medical community.
After its adoption in 1992, OIICS was
approved for use as the American
National Standard for Information
Management for Occupational Safety
and Health in 1995 (ANSI Z16.2–1995).
In addition to the BLS occupational
safety and health statistics program, the
OIICS is used by several state workers’
compensation agencies, the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health, and other organizations.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47771
In September 2007, the OIICS
underwent a minor update to
incorporate various interpretations and
corrections. A major revision followed
resulting in OIICS version 2.0 with an
additional minor update culminating in
version 2.01. Version 2.0 was adopted
with reference year 2011 and was
considered a major break in series.
Included were major changes to rules of
selection, new code births, as well as
the introduction of rules of precedence
designated by the numeric hierarchy of
the structures. The current version of
the OIICS (2.01) is available on the BLS
Web site at https://www.bls.gov/iif/
oshoiics.htm.
II. Current Action
A second major revision of OIICS was
initiated in spring 2017. This revision is
intended to update the classification
system to:
• Include new or emerging conditions
or workplace hazards that could
potentially result from an incident or
exposure in the workplace.
• Provide for data aggregations not
available with the current OIICS.
• Explore the need for new or
expanded coding structures to capture
other case characteristics, for example
worker activity.
• Improve and clarify order of
precedence and rules of selection.
• Improve the usability and layout of
the OIICS manual.
In addition, BLS will review the
International Statistical Classification of
Diseases and Related Health Problems
10th Revision (ICD–10), new ANSI
standards, international program
comparisons, and other comparable
coding structures to optimize the
capture of actionable insights for safety
intervention from BLS occupational
safety and health data.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
Comments and recommendations are
requested from the public on the
following aspects of the OIICS:
• The layout and organization of the
manual.
• The order of precedence and rules
of selection of the five case
characteristics (Nature of Injury or
Illness, Part of Body Affected, Source of
Injury or Illness, Secondary Source,
Event or Exposure).
• Potential new coded characteristics
(worker activity, work environment
exposures, location, etc.).
• The code categories, including
recommendations for additional
categories, and for merging or deleting
existing categories. (Please provide
justifications where possible.)
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
47772
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 197 / Friday, October 13, 2017 / Notices
• The descriptions of the code
categories, including the lists of
inclusions and exclusions.
• Alphabetical indices and other
desired tools for coding assistance.
• Any other thoughts on the coding
system.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of
October 2017.
Kimberley Hill,
Chief, Division of Management Systems.
[FR Doc. 2017–22188 Filed 10–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2017–0010]
Nevada State Plan; Change in Level of
Federal Enforcement: Private-Sector
Employment on Military Bases
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This document gives notice of
OSHA’s approval of a change to the
state of Nevada’s Occupational Safety
and Health State Plan reinstating federal
OSHA enforcement authority over
private-sector employment on military
facilities and bases in Nevada. The
Nevada State Plan currently has
coverage over some private-sector
contractors on military bases. Therefore,
OSHA amends the Nevada State Plan’s
coverage to reflect this change in the
level of federal enforcement.
DATES: Applicable Date: October 13,
2017.
SUMMARY:
For
press inquiries: Francis Meilinger,
Director, OSHA Office of
Communications: Telephone: (202) 693–
1999; email: meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.
For general and technical
information: Douglas J. Kalinowski,
Director, OSHA Directorate of
Cooperative and State Programs:
Telephone: (202) 693–2200; email:
kalinowski.doug@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 18
of the Occupational Safety and Health
Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. 667 (OSH Act),
provides that states that assume
responsibility for developing and
enforcing their own occupational safety
and health standards may do so by
submitting and obtaining federal
approval of a State Plan. State Plan
approval occurs in stages which include
initial approval under section 18(c) of
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Oct 12, 2017
Jkt 244001
the OSH Act and, ultimately, final
approval under section 18(e).
The Nevada State Plan was initially
approved under Section 18(c) of the
OSH Act on January 4, 1974 (39 FR
1009). The Nevada State Plan is
administered by the Department of
Business and Industry, Division of
Industrial Relations, Nevada
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (Nevada OSHA). On
April 18, 2000, OSHA announced the
final approval of the Nevada State Plan
pursuant to section 18(e) and amended
29 CFR part 1952 to reflect the Assistant
Secretary’s decision (65 FR 20742). As
a result, federal OSHA relinquished its
enforcement authority with regard to
occupational safety and health issues
covered by the Nevada State Plan.
Federal OSHA retained its authority
over safety and health in the private
sector over maritime employment;
contract workers, and contractoroperated facilities engaged in U.S.
Postal Service mail operations;
contractors and subcontractors on land
under exclusive federal jurisdiction;
employment on Indian Land; and any
hazard, industry, geographical area,
operation, or facility over which the
state is unable to effectively exercise
jurisdiction for reasons not related to
the required performance or structure of
the plan.
To establish military facilities, the
Federal Government may privately
purchase or lease land, as any other
entity would, and in those cases a State
Plan can cover private-sector
occupational safety and health on such
land. In other cases, the Federal
Government may ask a State to cede the
land to the Federal Government, in
which case the latter obtains
jurisdiction over it; however, a State
may retain some jurisdiction. Thus, the
determination whether the State Plan or
federal OSHA covers private-sector
employers on military facilities can be
complicated. For example, military
facilities in Nevada sometimes
encompass both land where jurisdiction
has been ceded and land privately
owned by the Federal Government
(though federal OSHA covers all federal
civilian employees on military
facilities). This situation has created
confusion as to whether federal OSHA
or the Nevada State Plan covers privatesector employers on a military facility,
and is a resource-intensive inquiry.
Thus, the Nevada State Plan requested
on December 14, 2016, that federal
OSHA resume enforcement authority
over all private-sector employment on
military facilities and bases. After
discussions between federal OSHA and
Nevada OSHA, both agencies agreed
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that federal coverage of all private-sector
contractors on military bases was the
best solution to ensure prompt and
effective protection to workers on
military bases in Nevada.
Accordingly, notice is hereby given of
the change in federal enforcement
authority over private-sector contractors
on military bases in Nevada, and
coverage is transferred from the Nevada
State Plan to federal OSHA.
Authority and Signature
Loren Sweatt, Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, U.S. Department of
Labor, authorized the preparation of this
notice. OSHA is issuing this notice
under the authority specified by Section
18 of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 667),
Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 1–2012
(77 FR 3912), and 29 CFR parts 1902,
1953 and 1955.
Signed in Washington, DC, on October 3,
2017.
Loren Sweatt,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2017–22175 Filed 10–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of Workers’ Compensation
Programs
Division of Coal Mine Workers’
Compensation; Proposed Extension of
Existing Collection; Comment Request
ACTION:
Notice.
Currently, the Office of
Workers’ Compensation Programs is
soliciting comments concerning the
proposed collection: Representative
Payee Report (CM–623), Representative
Payee Report, Short Form (CM–623S)
and Physician’s/Medical Officer’s
Statement (CM–787). A copy of the
proposed information collection request
can be obtained by contacting the office
listed below in the addresses section of
this Notice. This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be
provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted by December 12, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by mail, delivery service, or by hand to
Ms. Yoon Ferguson, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW.,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47770-47772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22188]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Comment Request
AGENCY: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor.
[[Page 47771]]
ACTION: Notice of solicitation of comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor through the Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS) is currently soliciting comments for the second major revision of
the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS),
current version 2.01. The last major revision occurred in 2011. BLS is
responsible for the development and publication of occupational injury,
illness, and fatality data. These data are compiled by the Survey of
Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII) and the Census of Fatal
Occupational Injuries (CFOI) programs. The OIICS is used to classify
certain case characteristics associated with the nonfatal and fatal
work injury cases received by the programs.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
Addresses section of this notice on or before February 1, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Christen Byler, Office of Safety, Health
and Working Conditions, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Room 3180, 2
Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20212 or by email to: OIICS-R@bls.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christen Byler, Office of Safety,
Health and Working Conditions, Bureau of Labor Statistics, telephone
number: 202-691-6252, or by email at: Byler.Christen@bls.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System is used
to code case characteristics of nonfatal injuries and illnesses
reported in the SOII and fatal injuries reported in CFOI. Cases are
classified according to five code structures that describe the injury
or illness and how it occurred:
Nature of Injury or Illness: Describes the physical
characteristics of the injury or illness.
Part of Body Affected: Identifies the part of the body
directly affected by the nature.
Source of Injury or Illness: Identifies the object or
substance that directly inflicted the injury or illness.
Event or Exposure: Describes the manner in which the
injury or illness was inflicted by the source.
Secondary Source: Identifies other objects or substances,
if any, that contributed to the event or exposure. The same code list
is used for both source and secondary source.
The case characteristic classification structures are hierarchical
with four levels of detail to facilitate the aggregation of information
and to accommodate both variations in detail available on reporting
forms and the needs of data users. For example, one user may wish to
look at data for injuries involving all trucks (Source code 825);
whereas, another user may be interested only in cases involving tractor
trailer trucks (Source code 8254). With the 2011 adoption of OIICS 2.0,
the numeric hierarchy also became an order of precedence within each of
the characteristics, designating which codes should be given priority
when multiple codes could be appropriate within a given case.
Each case characteristic structure is comprised of the following:
Rules of precedence: Designates which division within the
coded case characteristic, Event or Exposure, is to take precedence
when more than one code might be applicable within the case.
Rules of selection: Defines which codes should be used and
how different coded case characteristics interact with each other,
specifically event/source/secondary source and nature/part.
Code descriptions: Provides detailed definitions for
individual code categories and often gives examples of types of cases
that are included or excluded from the category.
Complete code list: Includes the codes and associated
titles by themselves without the descriptions.
Alphabetical indices.
The original Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System
(OIICS) was released in December 1992. It was developed by the Bureau
of Labor Statistics with input from data users and states participating
in the BLS Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Federal/State
cooperative programs. It was ultimately based on the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) Z16.2-1962, Method of Recording Basic Facts
Relating to the Nature and Occurrence of Work Injuries, revised 1969.
In addition, certain portions are based on the International
Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 9th
Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9 CM), which is widely used in the
medical community.
After its adoption in 1992, OIICS was approved for use as the
American National Standard for Information Management for Occupational
Safety and Health in 1995 (ANSI Z16.2-1995). In addition to the BLS
occupational safety and health statistics program, the OIICS is used by
several state workers' compensation agencies, the National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health, and other organizations.
In September 2007, the OIICS underwent a minor update to
incorporate various interpretations and corrections. A major revision
followed resulting in OIICS version 2.0 with an additional minor update
culminating in version 2.01. Version 2.0 was adopted with reference
year 2011 and was considered a major break in series. Included were
major changes to rules of selection, new code births, as well as the
introduction of rules of precedence designated by the numeric hierarchy
of the structures. The current version of the OIICS (2.01) is available
on the BLS Web site at https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshoiics.htm.
II. Current Action
A second major revision of OIICS was initiated in spring 2017. This
revision is intended to update the classification system to:
Include new or emerging conditions or workplace hazards
that could potentially result from an incident or exposure in the
workplace.
Provide for data aggregations not available with the
current OIICS.
Explore the need for new or expanded coding structures to
capture other case characteristics, for example worker activity.
Improve and clarify order of precedence and rules of
selection.
Improve the usability and layout of the OIICS manual.
In addition, BLS will review the International Statistical
Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision
(ICD-10), new ANSI standards, international program comparisons, and
other comparable coding structures to optimize the capture of
actionable insights for safety intervention from BLS occupational
safety and health data.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
Comments and recommendations are requested from the public on the
following aspects of the OIICS:
The layout and organization of the manual.
The order of precedence and rules of selection of the five
case characteristics (Nature of Injury or Illness, Part of Body
Affected, Source of Injury or Illness, Secondary Source, Event or
Exposure).
Potential new coded characteristics (worker activity, work
environment exposures, location, etc.).
The code categories, including recommendations for
additional categories, and for merging or deleting existing categories.
(Please provide justifications where possible.)
[[Page 47772]]
The descriptions of the code categories, including the
lists of inclusions and exclusions.
Alphabetical indices and other desired tools for coding
assistance.
Any other thoughts on the coding system.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of October 2017.
Kimberley Hill,
Chief, Division of Management Systems.
[FR Doc. 2017-22188 Filed 10-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
