Certain Height-Adjustable Desk Platforms and Components Thereof; Commission's Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation, 45608-45609 [2017-20904]

Download as PDF asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES 45608 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2017 / Notices contact Mr. James Bennett, Program Manager, Office of Renewable Energy Programs, by telephone at 703–787– 1300 or by email at james.bennett@ boem.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 5, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the 2009 Cape Wind Energy Project Final EIS and ordered that BOEM: ‘‘supplement [the EIS] with adequate geological surveys before Cape Wind may begin construction.’’ Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Hopper, 827 F.3d 1077, 1084 (D.C. Cir. 2016). The Court opined that: ‘‘[w]ithout adequate geological surveys, the [BOEM] cannot ‘ensure that the seafloor [will be] able to support’ wind turbines.’’ Id. at 1083. While the Court found that: ‘‘[BOEM] therefore had violated NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act)’’ the Court noted that ‘‘. . . [it] does not necessarily mean that the project must be halted or that Cape Wind must redo the regulatory approval process.’’ Id. at 1083–4. The Court explicitly left undisturbed BOEM’s 2010 decision to issue the lease and BOEM’s 2011 decision to approve the Construction and Operations Plan (COP). Id. at 1084. In light of the remand order and the remaining valid lease and COP, only two alternatives remain relevant to the court’s remand: The Proposed Action (affirming BOEM’s issuance of the existing lease) and the No Action Alternative (BOEM rescinding the lease). In its Final SEIS, BOEM examines the available geological survey data, including the geotechnical data and reports submitted to BOEM since the 2009 Final EIS, any other relevant data that relates to the adequacy of the seafloor to support wind turbines in the lease area, and considers public comments. On March 31, 2017, BOEM published the Draft SEIS, in response to the Court’s 2016 remand order discussed above, and a NOA in the Federal Register to announce the availability of the Draft SEIS and initiate a 45-day public comment period (82 FR 16060). Comments received can be found at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for docket ID BOEM–2017–0008. The Final SEIS addressed comments received by BOEM in response to the Draft SEIS during the 45-day comment period. On August 4, 2017 (82 FR 36418), BOEM published a NOA announcing the availability of the Final SEIS in the Federal Register. The Final SEIS can be found on BOEM’s Web site at: https://www.boem.gov/ Massachusetts-Cape-Wind/. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Sep 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 Authority: This notice is published pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR part 1506.6(b)) implementing the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Dated: September 26, 2017. Walter D. Cruickshank, Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. [FR Doc. 2017–20936 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1054] Certain Height-Adjustable Desk Platforms and Components Thereof; Commission’s Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 10) terminating the investigation based on settlement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on May 4, 2017 based on a complaint, filed on behalf of Varidesk LLC of Coppell, Texas (‘‘complainant’’). 82 FR 20919–20 (May 4, 2017). The complaint as supplemented alleges violations of SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain height-adjustable desk platforms and components thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,113,703; U.S. Patent No. 9,277,809; and U.S. Patent No. 9,554,644. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by section 337. The Commission’s notice of investigation named Lumi Legend Corporation of Ningbo, China; Innovative Office Products LLC of Easton, Pennsylvania; Ergotech Group LLC of Easton, Pennsylvania; Monoprice, Inc. of Rancho Cucamonga, California; and Transform Partners LLC (dba Mount-It!) of San Diego, California (collectively ‘‘the Lumi Legend respondents’’); Loctek Ergonomic Technology Corporation (formerly, Ningbo Loctek Visual Technology Corporation of Ningbo, China) of Ningbo, China; Zhejiang Loctek Smart Drive Technology Co., Ltd. of Ningbo, China; and Loctek Inc.’s (formerly, Zoxou, Inc. of Fremont, California) of Fremont, California (collectively herein, ‘‘Loctek respondents’’). The Office of Unfair Import Investigations did not participate in the investigation. The Lumi Legend respondents were previously terminated based on settlement. Order No. 5 (unreviewed, Commission Notice (July 11, 2017)). On August 29, 2017, complainant and the Loctek respondents filed a joint motion to terminate the Locktek respondents based on settlement. The motion asserted that there are no other agreements between complainant and the Loctek respondents. The parties represented ‘‘there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between these parties concerning the subject matter of the Investigation.’’ Motion at 1. On August 31, 2017, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 10) terminating the investigation based on settlement of the Loctek respondents. The ALJ found that all of the requirements of Commission rule 210.21, 19 CFR 210.21, had been met and that there were no public interest concerns that would weigh against termination. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID and terminates the investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2017 / Notices investigation is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations have the right to appear as parties in Commission antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The Secretary will prepare a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the investigations. Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 26, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–20904 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Background INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–584 and 731– TA–1382 (Preliminary)] Uncoated Groundwood Paper From Canada; Determinations asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of uncoated groundwood paper from Canada, provided for in subheadings 4801.00.01, 4802.61.10, 4802.61.20, 4802.61.31, 4802.61.60, 4802.62.10, 4802.62.20, 4802.62.30, 4802.62.61, 4802.69.10, 4802.69.20, 4802.69.30, 4805.91.50, 4805.91.70, and 4805.91.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’) and to be subsidized by the government of Canada. Commencement of Final Phase Investigations Pursuant to section 207.18 of the Commission’s rules, the Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of its investigations. The Commission will issue a final phase notice of scheduling, which will be published in the Federal Register as provided in section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules, upon notice from the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative preliminary determinations in the investigations under sections 703(b) or 733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary determinations are negative, upon notice of affirmative final determinations in those investigations under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the Act. Parties that filed entries of appearance in the preliminary phase of the investigations need not enter a separate appearance for the final phase of the investigations. Industrial users, and, if the merchandise under On August 9, 2017, North Pacific Paper Company (‘‘NORPAC’’), Longview, Washington filed a petition with the Commission and Commerce, alleging that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of LTFV and subsidized imports of uncoated groundwood paper from Canada. Accordingly, effective August 9, 2017, the Commission, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)), instituted countervailing duty investigation No. 701–TA–584 and antidumping duty investigation No. 731–TA–1382 (Preliminary). Notice of the institution of the Commission’s investigations and of a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register of August 15, 2017 (82 FR 38707). The conference was held in Washington, DC, on August 30, 2017, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It completed and filed its determinations in these investigations on September 25, 2017. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4732 (October 2017), entitled Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–584 and 731–1382 (Preliminary). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 25, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–20878 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Sep 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 45609 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1035] Certain Liquid Crystal Ewriters and Components Thereof; Commission Final Determination of Violation of Section 337; Termination of Investigation; Issuance of Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Order U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission has determined to issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist order. The investigation is terminated. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on January 13, 2017, based on a complaint filed by Kent Displays, Inc. of Kent, Ohio (‘‘Kent Displays’’). 82 FR 4418. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid crystal eWriters and components thereof that infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,351,506 (‘‘the ’506 patent’’) and 8,947,604 (‘‘the ’604 patent’’). Id. The Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondents Shenzhen Howshow E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45608-45609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20904]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1054]


Certain Height-Adjustable Desk Platforms and Components Thereof; 
Commission's Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement; Termination of the 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 10) 
terminating the investigation based on settlement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office 
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of 
non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on May 4, 2017 based on a complaint, filed on behalf of Varidesk LLC of 
Coppell, Texas (``complainant''). 82 FR 20919-20 (May 4, 2017). The 
complaint as supplemented alleges violations of section 337 based upon 
the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and 
the sale within the United States after importation of certain height-
adjustable desk platforms and components thereof by reason of 
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,113,703; U.S. Patent No. 9,277,809; 
and U.S. Patent No. 9,554,644. The complaint further alleges that an 
industry in the United States exists as required by section 337. The 
Commission's notice of investigation named Lumi Legend Corporation of 
Ningbo, China; Innovative Office Products LLC of Easton, Pennsylvania; 
Ergotech Group LLC of Easton, Pennsylvania; Monoprice, Inc. of Rancho 
Cucamonga, California; and Transform Partners LLC (dba Mount-It!) of 
San Diego, California (collectively ``the Lumi Legend respondents''); 
Loctek Ergonomic Technology Corporation (formerly, Ningbo Loctek Visual 
Technology Corporation of Ningbo, China) of Ningbo, China; Zhejiang 
Loctek Smart Drive Technology Co., Ltd. of Ningbo, China; and Loctek 
Inc.'s (formerly, Zoxou, Inc. of Fremont, California) of Fremont, 
California (collectively herein, ``Loctek respondents''). The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations did not participate in the investigation. 
The Lumi Legend respondents were previously terminated based on 
settlement. Order No. 5 (unreviewed, Commission Notice (July 11, 
2017)).
    On August 29, 2017, complainant and the Loctek respondents filed a 
joint motion to terminate the Locktek respondents based on settlement. 
The motion asserted that there are no other agreements between 
complainant and the Loctek respondents. The parties represented ``there 
are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between 
these parties concerning the subject matter of the Investigation.'' 
Motion at 1.
    On August 31, 2017, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 10) terminating 
the investigation based on settlement of the Loctek respondents. The 
ALJ found that all of the requirements of Commission rule 210.21, 19 
CFR 210.21, had been met and that there were no public interest 
concerns that would weigh against termination. No petitions for review 
were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID and 
terminates the investigation.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of

[[Page 45609]]

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 26, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-20904 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.