Certain Periodontal Laser Devices and Components Thereof Institution of Investigation, 43401-43402 [2017-19596]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 178 / Friday, September 15, 2017 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
agreements provide additional
significant benefits to the Pueblos and
local communities, including federal
funding to help construct the Pojoaque
Basin Regional Water System and
federal funding to establish the Aamodt
Pueblos Settlement Fund. The nonfederal Settlement Parties submitted a
signed Settlement Agreement to
Congress prior to enactment of the
Settlement Act, which has been revised
and signed by the Settlement Parties
pursuant to the terms of the Settlement
Act. In order for the Settlement
Agreement to remain enforceable, nine
conditions precedent outlined in section
623 of the Settlement Act must be
fulfilled by September 15, 2017.
Statement of Findings
In accordance with section 623(a)(2)
of the Settlement Act, I find as follows:
(A) To the extent that the Settlement
Agreement conflicted with the
Settlement Act, the Settlement
Agreement has been revised to conform
with the Settlement Act.
(B) The Settlement Agreement, as
revised, including waivers and releases
pursuant to section 624 of the
Settlement Act, has been executed by
the appropriate parties and the
Secretary.
(C) Congress has fully appropriated,
or the Secretary has provided from other
authorized sources, all funds authorized
by section 617 of the Settlement Act,
with the exception of subsection (a)(1)
of that section.
(D) The Secretary has acquired and
entered into appropriate contracts for
the water rights described in section
613(a) of the Settlement Act.
(E) For purposes of section 613(a) of
the Settlement Act, permits have been
issued by the New Mexico State
Engineer to the Pojoaque Basin Regional
Water Authority (Authority) formed
pursuant to section 9.5 of the Settlement
Agreement to change the points of
diversion to the mainstem of the Rio
Grande for the diversion and
consumptive use of at least 2,381 acrefeet by the Pueblos as part of the water
supply for the Regional Water System,
subject to the conditions that (i) the
permits are free of any condition that
materially adversely affects the ability of
the Pueblos or the Authority to divert or
use the Pueblo water supply described
in section 613(a) of the Settlement Act,
including water rights acquired in
addition to those described in section
613(a) of the Settlement Act, in
accordance with section 613(g) of the
Settlement Act; and (ii) the Settlement
Agreement establishes the means to
address any permit conditions to ensure
the ability of the Pueblos to fully divert
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Sep 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
and consume at least 2,381 acre-feet as
part of the water supply for the Regional
Water System, including defining the
conditions that will not constitute a
material adverse effect.
(F) The State has enacted necessary
legislation and has provided funding as
required under the Settlement
Agreement.
(G) A partial final decree that sets
forth the water rights and other rights to
water to which the Pueblos are entitled
under the Settlement Agreement and the
Settlement Act and that substantially
conforms to the Settlement Agreement
has been approved by the Court.
(H) A final decree that sets forth the
water rights for all parties to the Aamodt
Case and that substantially conforms to
the Settlement Agreement has been
approved by the Court.
(I) The waivers and releases described
in section 624 of the Settlement Act
have been executed.
Ryan K. Zinke,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2017–19541 Filed 9–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4334–63–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1070]
Certain Periodontal Laser Devices and
Components Thereof Institution of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
August 10, 2017, on behalf of
Millennium Dental Technologies, Inc. of
Cerritos, California. A supplement was
filed on August 18, 2017. The complaint
alleges violations based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain periodontal laser devices and
components thereof by reason of false
advertising, the threat or effect of which
is to destroy or substantially injure an
industry in the United States.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43401
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
September 8, 2017, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain periodontal laser
devices and components thereof by
reason of false advertising, the threat or
effect of which is to destroy or
substantially injure an industry in the
United States;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1)
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
43402
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 178 / Friday, September 15, 2017 / Notices
(a) The complainant is: Millennium
Dental Technologies, Inc., 10945 South
Street, Suite 104–A, Cerritos, CA 90703.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Fotona d.o.o., Stegne 7, Ljubljana 1000,
Slovenia
Fotona, LLC, 2307 Springlake Road
#518, Dallas, TX 75234
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 11, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–19596 Filed 9–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Sep 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1334–1337
(Final)]
Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber
From Brazil, Korea, Mexico, and
Poland
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant
to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’),
that an industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
of emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber
from Brazil, Korea, Mexico, and Poland,
provided for in subheading 4002.19.00
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that have been found
by the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in the United
States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’).2 3
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section
735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)),
instituted these investigations effective
July 21, 2016, following receipt of a
petition filed with the Commission and
Commerce by Lion Elastomers, LLC,
Port Neches, Texas, and East West
Copolymer, LLC, Baton Rouge,
Louisiana. The Commission scheduled
the final phase of the investigations
following notification of preliminary
determinations by Commerce that
imports of emulsion styrene-butadiene
rubber from Brazil, Korea, Mexico, and
Poland were being sold at LTFV within
the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the
scheduling of the final phase of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public hearing to be held in connection
therewith was given by posting copies
of the notice in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, Washington, DC, and by
publishing the notice in the Federal
Register of March 13, 2017 (82 FR
13503). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on June 29, 2017, and
all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Vice Chairman David S. Johanson and
Commissioner Meredith M. Broadbent dissenting.
3 The Commission also finds that imports subject
to Commerce’s affirmative critical circumstances
determination are not likely to undermine seriously
the remedial effect of the antidumping duty order
on Korea.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)).
It completed and filed its
determinations in these investigations
on August 25, 2017. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC
Publication 4717 (August 2017), entitled
Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber
from Brazil, Korea, Mexico, and Poland:
Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1334–1337
(Final).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 12, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–19675 Filed 9–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1069]
Certain Pool and Spa Enclosures;
Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on May
10, 2017, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of
Aqua Shield, Inc. of West Babylon, New
York. An amended complaint was filed
on July 17, 2017. Supplements to the
amended complaint were filed on
August 10, 2017 and September 5, 2017.
The complaint, as amended, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain pool and spa enclosures by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Patent No. 6,637,160 (‘‘the ’160
patent’’). The amended complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The amended complaint,
except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Room 112, Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205–2000.
Hearing impaired individuals are
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43401-43402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19596]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1070]
Certain Periodontal Laser Devices and Components Thereof
Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 10, 2017, on behalf of
Millennium Dental Technologies, Inc. of Cerritos, California. A
supplement was filed on August 18, 2017. The complaint alleges
violations based upon the importation into the United States, the sale
for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain periodontal laser devices and components thereof
by reason of false advertising, the threat or effect of which is to
destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on September 8, 2017, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain periodontal
laser devices and components thereof by reason of false advertising,
the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an
industry in the United States;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1),
(f)(1), (g)(1)
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
[[Page 43402]]
(a) The complainant is: Millennium Dental Technologies, Inc., 10945
South Street, Suite 104-A, Cerritos, CA 90703.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Fotona d.o.o., Stegne 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
Fotona, LLC, 2307 Springlake Road #518, Dallas, TX 75234
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 11, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-19596 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P