Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; EU-U.S. Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on the List of Arbitrators, 42294-42295 [2017-18896]
Download as PDF
42294
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2017 / Notices
publication of the final results of this
review for shipments of the subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by sections
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the
companies listed above that have a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be equal to the weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final
results of this review (except, if the rate
is de minimis, then cash deposit rate
will be zero); (2) for previously
examined PRC and non-PRC exporters
not listed above that at the time of entry
are eligible for a separate rate based on
a prior completed segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporterspecific cash deposit rate; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate at the time of entry, the
cash deposit rate will be that for the
PRC-wide entity (i.e., 118.04 percent);
and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which at the time
of entry are not eligible for a separate
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Department’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Interested Parties
This preliminary determination is
issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: August 31, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix 1
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Sep 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
3. Scope of the Order
4. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
5. Non-Market Economy Country Status
6. Separate Rates
7. Application of Facts Available and Use of
Adverse Inference
8. Facts Available
9. Surrogate Country
10. Date of Sale
11. Normal Value Comparisons
12. Factor Valuation Methodology
13. Comparisons to Normal Value
14. Currency Conversion
15. Recommendation
Appendix 2
1. Aironware (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
2. Certified Products Taiwan Inc.
3. Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp.
4. Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd.
5. Huanghua Xionghua Hardware Products
Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2017–18977 Filed 9–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; EU–U.S. Privacy
Shield; Invitation for Applications for
Inclusion on the List of Arbitrators
International Trade
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before November 6,
2017.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at PRAcomments@doc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Nasreen Djouini at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, either by
email at Nasreen.Djouini@trade.gov, or
by fax at: 202–482–5522. More
information on the arbitration
mechanism may be found at https://
www.privacyshield.gov/
article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework was designed by the U.S.
Department of Commerce (DOC) and the
European Commission (Commission) to
provide companies on both sides of the
Atlantic with a mechanism to comply
with data protection requirements when
transferring personal data from the
European Union to the United States in
support of transatlantic commerce. On
July 12, 2016, the Commission deemed
the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
(Privacy Shield) adequate to enable data
transfers under EU law, and on August
1, 2016, the DOC began accepting selfcertifications from U.S. companies to
join the program (81 FR 47752; July 22,
2016). For more information on the
Privacy Shield, visit
www.privacyshield.gov.
As described in Annex I of the
Privacy Shield, the DOC and the
Commission have committed to
implement an arbitration mechanism to
provide European individuals with the
ability to invoke binding arbitration to
determine, for residual claims, whether
an organization has violated its
obligations under the Privacy Shield.
Organizations voluntarily self-certify to
the Privacy Shield and, upon
certification, the commitments the
organization has made to comply with
the Privacy Shield become legally
enforceable under U.S. law.
Organizations that self-certify to the
Privacy Shield commit to binding
arbitration of residual claims if the
individual chooses to exercise that
option. Under the arbitration option, a
Privacy Shield Panel (consisting of one
or three arbitrators, as agreed by the
parties) has the authority to impose
individual-specific, non-monetary
equitable relief (such as access,
correction, deletion, or return of the
individual’s data in question) necessary
to remedy the violation of the Privacy
Shield only with respect to the
individual. The parties will select the
arbitrators from the list of arbitrators
described below.
The DOC and the European
Commission seek to develop a list of at
least 20 arbitrators. To be eligible for
inclusion on the list, applicants must be
admitted to practice law in the United
States and have expertise in both U.S.
privacy law and EU data protection law.
Applicants shall not be subject to any
instructions from, or be affiliated with,
any Privacy Shield organization, or the
U.S., EU, or any EU Member State or
any other governmental authority,
public authority or enforcement
authority.
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2017 / Notices
Eligible individuals will be evaluated
on the basis of independence, integrity,
and expertise:
Independence
• Freedom from bias and prejudice.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Integrity
• Held in the highest regard by peers
for integrity, fairness and good
judgment.
• Demonstrates high ethical standards
and commitment necessary to be an
arbitrator.
Expertise
Required:
• Admission to practice law in the
United States.
• Level of demonstrated expertise in
U.S. privacy law and EU data protection
law.
Other expertise that may be
considered includes any of the
following:
• Relevant educational degrees and
professional licenses.
• Relevant professional or academic
experience or legal practice.
• Relevant training or experience in
arbitration or other forms of dispute
resolution.
Evaluation of applications for
inclusion on the list of arbitrators will
be undertaken by the DOC and the
Commission. Selected applicants will
remain on the list for a period of 3 years,
absent exceptional circumstances;
change in eligibility, or for cause,
renewable for one additional period of
3 years.
The DOC is in the process of selecting
an administrator for Privacy Shield
arbitrations.a Among other things, once
selected, the Administrator will
facilitate arbitrator fee arrangements,
including the collection and timely
payment of arbitrator fees and other
expenses. Arbitrators are expected to
commit their time and effort when
included on the Privacy Shield List of
Arbitrators and to take reasonable steps
to minimize the costs or fees of the
arbitration.
Arbitrators will be subject to a code of
conduct consistent with Annex I of the
Privacy Shield Framework and
generally accepted ethical standards for
arbitrators. The DOC and the
Commission agreed to adopt an existing,
well-established set of U.S. arbitral
procedures to govern the arbitral
proceedings, subject to considerations
identified in Annex I of the Privacy
Shield Framework, including that
a For more information about the selection
process and the role of the administrator, see
https://www.privacyshield.gov/Arbitration-FactSheet.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Sep 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
materials submitted to arbitrators will
be treated confidentially and will only
be used in connection with the
arbitration. For more information,
please visit https://
www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=GArbitration-Procedures where you can
find information on the arbitration
procedures.
Applications
Eligible individuals who wish to be
considered for inclusion on the EU–U.S.
Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators are
invited to submit applications by
October 6, 2017 deadline. Applications
must be typewritten and should be
headed ‘‘Application for Inclusion on
the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield List of
Arbitrators.’’ Applications should
include the following information, and
each section of the application should
be numbered as indicated:
—Name of applicant.
—Address, telephone number, and
email address.
1. Independence
—Description of the applicant’s
affiliations with any Privacy Shield
organization, or the U.S., EU, any EU
Member State or any other
governmental authority, public
authority, or enforcement authority.
2. Integrity
—On a separate page, the names,
addresses, telephone, and fax
numbers of three individuals willing
to provide information concerning the
applicant’s qualifications for service,
including the applicant’s character,
reputation, reliability, and judgment.
—Description of the applicant’s
willingness and ability to make time
commitments necessary to be an
arbitrator.
3. Expertise
—Demonstration of admittance to
practice law in the United States.
—Relevant academic degrees and
professional training and licensing.
—Current employment, including title,
description of responsibility, name
and address of employer, and name
and telephone number of supervisor
or other reference.
—Employment history, including the
dates and addresses of each prior
position and a summary of
responsibilities.
—Description of expertise in U.S.
privacy law and EU data protection
law.
—Description of training or experience
in arbitration or other forms of
dispute resolution, if applicable.
—A list of publications, testimony, and
speeches, if any, concerning U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
42295
privacy law and EU data protection
law, with copies appended.
II. Method of Collection
Please submit applications by
September 25, 2017 deadline to Nasreen
Djouini at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, either by email at
Nasreen.Djouini@trade.gov, or by fax at:
202–482–5522. More information on the
arbitration mechanism may be found at
https://www.privacyshield.gov/
article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0625–0277.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: private individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
60.
Estimated Time per Response: 240
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 240 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–18896 Filed 9–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42294-42295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18896]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; EU-U.S. Privacy
Shield; Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on the List of
Arbitrators
AGENCY: International Trade Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before November 6,
2017.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at PRAcomments@doc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to Nasreen Djouini at the U.S. Department of Commerce,
either by email at Nasreen.Djouini@trade.gov, or by fax at: 202-482-
5522. More information on the arbitration mechanism may be found at
https://www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework was designed by the U.S.
Department of Commerce (DOC) and the European Commission (Commission)
to provide companies on both sides of the Atlantic with a mechanism to
comply with data protection requirements when transferring personal
data from the European Union to the United States in support of
transatlantic commerce. On July 12, 2016, the Commission deemed the EU-
U.S. Privacy Shield Framework (Privacy Shield) adequate to enable data
transfers under EU law, and on August 1, 2016, the DOC began accepting
self-certifications from U.S. companies to join the program (81 FR
47752; July 22, 2016). For more information on the Privacy Shield,
visit www.privacyshield.gov.
As described in Annex I of the Privacy Shield, the DOC and the
Commission have committed to implement an arbitration mechanism to
provide European individuals with the ability to invoke binding
arbitration to determine, for residual claims, whether an organization
has violated its obligations under the Privacy Shield. Organizations
voluntarily self-certify to the Privacy Shield and, upon certification,
the commitments the organization has made to comply with the Privacy
Shield become legally enforceable under U.S. law. Organizations that
self-certify to the Privacy Shield commit to binding arbitration of
residual claims if the individual chooses to exercise that option.
Under the arbitration option, a Privacy Shield Panel (consisting of one
or three arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has the authority to
impose individual-specific, non-monetary equitable relief (such as
access, correction, deletion, or return of the individual's data in
question) necessary to remedy the violation of the Privacy Shield only
with respect to the individual. The parties will select the arbitrators
from the list of arbitrators described below.
The DOC and the European Commission seek to develop a list of at
least 20 arbitrators. To be eligible for inclusion on the list,
applicants must be admitted to practice law in the United States and
have expertise in both U.S. privacy law and EU data protection law.
Applicants shall not be subject to any instructions from, or be
affiliated with, any Privacy Shield organization, or the U.S., EU, or
any EU Member State or any other governmental authority, public
authority or enforcement authority.
[[Page 42295]]
Eligible individuals will be evaluated on the basis of
independence, integrity, and expertise:
Independence
Freedom from bias and prejudice.
Integrity
Held in the highest regard by peers for integrity,
fairness and good judgment.
Demonstrates high ethical standards and commitment
necessary to be an arbitrator.
Expertise
Required:
Admission to practice law in the United States.
Level of demonstrated expertise in U.S. privacy law and EU
data protection law.
Other expertise that may be considered includes any of the
following:
Relevant educational degrees and professional licenses.
Relevant professional or academic experience or legal
practice.
Relevant training or experience in arbitration or other
forms of dispute resolution.
Evaluation of applications for inclusion on the list of arbitrators
will be undertaken by the DOC and the Commission. Selected applicants
will remain on the list for a period of 3 years, absent exceptional
circumstances; change in eligibility, or for cause, renewable for one
additional period of 3 years.
The DOC is in the process of selecting an administrator for Privacy
Shield arbitrations.\a\ Among other things, once selected, the
Administrator will facilitate arbitrator fee arrangements, including
the collection and timely payment of arbitrator fees and other
expenses. Arbitrators are expected to commit their time and effort when
included on the Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators and to take
reasonable steps to minimize the costs or fees of the arbitration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ For more information about the selection process and the
role of the administrator, see https://www.privacyshield.gov/Arbitration-Fact-Sheet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arbitrators will be subject to a code of conduct consistent with
Annex I of the Privacy Shield Framework and generally accepted ethical
standards for arbitrators. The DOC and the Commission agreed to adopt
an existing, well-established set of U.S. arbitral procedures to govern
the arbitral proceedings, subject to considerations identified in Annex
I of the Privacy Shield Framework, including that materials submitted
to arbitrators will be treated confidentially and will only be used in
connection with the arbitration. For more information, please visit
https://www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=G-Arbitration-Procedures where
you can find information on the arbitration procedures.
Applications
Eligible individuals who wish to be considered for inclusion on the
EU-U.S. Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators are invited to submit
applications by October 6, 2017 deadline. Applications must be
typewritten and should be headed ``Application for Inclusion on the EU-
U.S. Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators.'' Applications should include
the following information, and each section of the application should
be numbered as indicated:
--Name of applicant.
--Address, telephone number, and email address.
1. Independence
--Description of the applicant's affiliations with any Privacy Shield
organization, or the U.S., EU, any EU Member State or any other
governmental authority, public authority, or enforcement authority.
2. Integrity
--On a separate page, the names, addresses, telephone, and fax numbers
of three individuals willing to provide information concerning the
applicant's qualifications for service, including the applicant's
character, reputation, reliability, and judgment.
--Description of the applicant's willingness and ability to make time
commitments necessary to be an arbitrator.
3. Expertise
--Demonstration of admittance to practice law in the United States.
--Relevant academic degrees and professional training and licensing.
--Current employment, including title, description of responsibility,
name and address of employer, and name and telephone number of
supervisor or other reference.
--Employment history, including the dates and addresses of each prior
position and a summary of responsibilities.
--Description of expertise in U.S. privacy law and EU data protection
law.
--Description of training or experience in arbitration or other forms
of dispute resolution, if applicable.
--A list of publications, testimony, and speeches, if any, concerning
U.S. privacy law and EU data protection law, with copies appended.
II. Method of Collection
Please submit applications by September 25, 2017 deadline to
Nasreen Djouini at the U.S. Department of Commerce, either by email at
Nasreen.Djouini@trade.gov, or by fax at: 202-482-5522. More information
on the arbitration mechanism may be found at https://www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0625-0277.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: private individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 60.
Estimated Time per Response: 240 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 240 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-18896 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P