Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 42075-42076 [2017-18824]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 6, 2017 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–836]
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate Products From the
Republic of Korea: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 3, 2017, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate
products (CTL plate) from the Republic
of Korea (Korea). Based on our analysis
of the comments received, we continue
to find that subject merchandise has
been sold at less than normal value.
DATES: Applicable September 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun or Thomas Schauer, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5760 or (202) 482–0410,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 3, 2017, the Department
published the Preliminary Results of the
administrative review.1 The period of
review is February 1, 2015, through
January 31, 2016. We invited interested
parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results and received case and rebuttal
briefs from interested parties.2
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section 751
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
Scope of the Order
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
The products covered by the
antidumping duty order are certain CTL
plate. Imports of CTL plate are currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
under subheadings 7208.40.30.30,
1 See
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel
Plate Products from the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 12431
(March 3, 2017) (Preliminary Results).
2 See the case briefs from Nucor Corporation and
Hyundai Steel Company dated April 3, 2017, the
redacted case brief from Samsung C&T Corporation
dated April 7, 2017, and the rebuttal briefs from
Nucor Corporation, Hyundai Steel Company, and
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. dated April 10, 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Sep 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
7208.40.30.60, 7208.51.00.30,
7208.51.00.45, 7208.51.00.60,
7208.52.00.00, 7208.53.00.00,
7208.90.00.00, 7210.70.30.00,
7210.90.90.00, 7211.13.00.00,
7211.14.00.30, 7211.14.00.45,
7211.90.00.00, 7212.40.10.00,
7212.40.50.00, 7212.50.00.00,
7225.40.30.50, 7225.40.70.00,
7225.50.60.00, 7225.99.00.90,
7226.91.50.00, 7226.91.70.00,
7226.91.80.00, and 7226.99.00.00. While
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description is dispositive. A
full description of the scope of the order
is contained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.3
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties in this review
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice. A list of the issues raised
is attached in the Appendix to this
notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B–8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/.
Final Determination of No Shipments
We preliminarily found that Daewoo
International Corp., GS Global Corp.,
Hyosung Corporation, Hyundai Glovis
Co., Ltd., Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co.,
Ltd., Samsung C&T Corporation,
Samsung Heavy Industries, and SK
Networks Co., Ltd. did not have any
reviewable entries of subject
merchandise during the POR.4 After the
Preliminary Results, we received no
comments or additional information
with respect to these eight companies.5
3 See the Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Certain Cut-toLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from
the Republic of Korea; 2015–2016,’’ dated
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
4 See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 12432 and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
at 3.
5 In its case brief, Samsung C&T Corporation
requested that the Department issue a final
determination of no shipments for Samsung C&T
Engineering & Construction Group and Samsung
C&T Trading and Investment Group. See Samsung
C&T Corporation’s redacted case brief dated April
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42075
Therefore, for the final results, we
continue to find that these eight
companies did not have any reviewable
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR. Consistent with our practice,
we will issue appropriate instructions to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) based on our final results.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments
received, we revised the preliminary
margin calculations for Dongkuk Steel
Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM) and Hyundai Steel
Company (Hyundai Steel). These
revisions resulted in changes to the
margins for DSM and the respondents
not selected for individual examination,
but no changes to the margin for
Hyundai Steel, for the final results of
this review.6
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
We determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the respondents for the period
February 1, 2015, through January 31,
2016.
Producer/exporter
BDP International .................
Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd ..........
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd ..
Hyundai Steel Company .......
Samsung C&T Engineering
& Construction Group .......
Samsung C&T Trading and
Investment Group .............
Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd ........
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
2.03
2.03
1.84
2.05
2.03
2.03
2.03
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this proceeding
within five days after public
announcement of the final results in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the
Department will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
7, 2017. We denied this request. See Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 8.
6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum for
further details on the changes we made for these
final results. See also the Memoranda, ‘‘Certain Cutto-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from
the Republic of Korea: Final Analysis Memorandum
for Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd.,’’ and ‘‘Certain Cutto-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from
the Republic of Korea: Final Results Analysis
Memorandum for Hyundai Steel Company,’’ dated
concurrently with this notice.
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
42076
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 6, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review.
For DSM and Hyundai Steel, we
calculated importer-specific assessment
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total
amount of antidumping duties
calculated for each importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of the
sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).7 For entries of subject
merchandise during the period of
review produced by DSM or Hyundai
Steel for which it did not know its
merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For the companies
which were not selected for individual
examination, BDP International, Bookuk
Steel Co., Ltd., Samsung C&T
Engineering & Construction Group,
Samsung C&T Trading and Investment
Group, and Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd., we
will instruct CBP to apply the rates
listed above to all entries of subject
merchandise produced and/or exported
by these firms. For the eight companies
that we determined had no reviewable
entries of the subject merchandise in
this review period, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate any applicable entries of
subject merchandise at the all-others
rate. We intend to issue liquidation
instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of these
reviews.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be applicable upon publication of
this notice for all shipments of CTL
plate from Korea entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for the companies
listed above will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margins
established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a prior completed segment of
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most
recent period; (3) if the exporter is not
a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation but
the producer has been covered in a prior
7 In these final results, the Department applied
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Sep 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
complete segment of this proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the producer of the merchandise; (4)
the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 0.98 percent,8 the allothers rate determined in the less-thanfair-value (LTFV) investigation, adjusted
for the export-subsidy rate in the
companion countervailing duty
investigation. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Individual Examination
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Differential Pricing
Comment 2: Major-Input Rule
Comment 3: Cost Differences Not
Associated With Physical Characteristics
Comment 4: Cost of Prime Products
Comment 5: Affiliated-Party Inputs
Comment 6: Overrun Sales
Comment 7: Marine Insurance
Comment 8: Reviewable Entries
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a violation subject to sanction.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 30, 2017.
Gary Taverman.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Rates for Respondents Not Selected for
8 See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and New Shipper Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR
62712, 62714 (September 12, 2016).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2017–18824 Filed 9–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
International Trade Administration
[A–201–836]
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and
Tube From Mexico: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on light-walled
rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT)
from Mexico. The period of review is
August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016.
The review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise,
Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A.
de C.V (Productos Laminados). We
preliminarily determine that sales of
subject merchandise by Productos
Laminados and affiliated reseller,
Aceros Cuatros Caminos S.A. de C.V.
(A4C) (collectively, Prolamsa), were not
made at less than normal value during
the period of review. Interested parties
are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable September 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–9179.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
These preliminary results of review
are made in accordance with section
733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). On October 14,
2016, the Department published the
notice of initiation for the
administrative review.1 For a complete
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM
06SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42075-42076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18824]
[[Page 42075]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-836]
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From
the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 3, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel
plate products (CTL plate) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). Based on
our analysis of the comments received, we continue to find that subject
merchandise has been sold at less than normal value.
DATES: Applicable September 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Thomas Schauer, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760 or (202)
482-0410, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 3, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Results
of the administrative review.\1\ The period of review is February 1,
2015, through January 31, 2016. We invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results and received case and rebuttal
briefs from interested parties.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate
Products from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 12431
(March 3, 2017) (Preliminary Results).
\2\ See the case briefs from Nucor Corporation and Hyundai Steel
Company dated April 3, 2017, the redacted case brief from Samsung
C&T Corporation dated April 7, 2017, and the rebuttal briefs from
Nucor Corporation, Hyundai Steel Company, and Dongkuk Steel Mill
Co., Ltd. dated April 10, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the antidumping duty order are certain CTL
plate. Imports of CTL plate are currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings
7208.40.30.30, 7208.40.30.60, 7208.51.00.30, 7208.51.00.45,
7208.51.00.60, 7208.52.00.00, 7208.53.00.00, 7208.90.00.00,
7210.70.30.00, 7210.90.90.00, 7211.13.00.00, 7211.14.00.30,
7211.14.00.45, 7211.90.00.00, 7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00,
7212.50.00.00, 7225.40.30.50, 7225.40.70.00, 7225.50.60.00,
7225.99.00.90, 7226.91.50.00, 7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and
7226.99.00.00. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full
description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See the Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain
Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from the Republic
of Korea; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which
is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised is
attached in the Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B-8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Final Determination of No Shipments
We preliminarily found that Daewoo International Corp., GS Global
Corp., Hyosung Corporation, Hyundai Glovis Co., Ltd., Hyundai Mipo
Dockyard Co., Ltd., Samsung C&T Corporation, Samsung Heavy Industries,
and SK Networks Co., Ltd. did not have any reviewable entries of
subject merchandise during the POR.\4\ After the Preliminary Results,
we received no comments or additional information with respect to these
eight companies.\5\ Therefore, for the final results, we continue to
find that these eight companies did not have any reviewable entries of
subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with our practice, we
will issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) based on our final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 12432 and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3.
\5\ In its case brief, Samsung C&T Corporation requested that
the Department issue a final determination of no shipments for
Samsung C&T Engineering & Construction Group and Samsung C&T Trading
and Investment Group. See Samsung C&T Corporation's redacted case
brief dated April 7, 2017. We denied this request. See Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments received, we revised the
preliminary margin calculations for Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM)
and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel). These revisions resulted in
changes to the margins for DSM and the respondents not selected for
individual examination, but no changes to the margin for Hyundai Steel,
for the final results of this review.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum for further details on
the changes we made for these final results. See also the Memoranda,
``Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from the
Republic of Korea: Final Analysis Memorandum for Dongkuk Steel Mill
Co., Ltd.,'' and ``Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate
Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results Analysis
Memorandum for Hyundai Steel Company,'' dated concurrently with this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of the Administrative Review
We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the respondents for the period February 1, 2015, through
January 31, 2016.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BDP International....................................... 2.03
Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd................................... 2.03
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd............................. 1.84
Hyundai Steel Company................................... 2.05
Samsung C&T Engineering & Construction Group............ 2.03
Samsung C&T Trading and Investment Group................ 2.03
Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd................................. 2.03
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this
proceeding within five days after public announcement of the final
results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject
[[Page 42076]]
merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review.
For DSM and Hyundai Steel, we calculated importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for each importer's examined sales and
the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).\7\ For entries of subject merchandise during the period
of review produced by DSM or Hyundai Steel for which it did not know
its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is
no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
For the companies which were not selected for individual examination,
BDP International, Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd., Samsung C&T Engineering &
Construction Group, Samsung C&T Trading and Investment Group, and Sung
Jin Steel Co., Ltd., we will instruct CBP to apply the rates listed
above to all entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by
these firms. For the eight companies that we determined had no
reviewable entries of the subject merchandise in this review period, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate any applicable entries of subject
merchandise at the all-others rate. We intend to issue liquidation
instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of
these reviews.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In these final results, the Department applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be applicable upon
publication of this notice for all shipments of CTL plate from Korea
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act:
(1) The cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will be equal
to the weighted-average dumping margins established in the final
results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by
producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a
prior completed segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or the original investigation but the producer has been
covered in a prior complete segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period
for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 0.98 percent,\8\
the all-others rate determined in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in the companion
countervailing duty investigation. These cash deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate
Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR
62712, 62714 (September 12, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation
subject to sanction.
This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 30, 2017.
Gary Taverman.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Rates for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Differential Pricing
Comment 2: Major-Input Rule
Comment 3: Cost Differences Not Associated With Physical
Characteristics
Comment 4: Cost of Prime Products
Comment 5: Affiliated-Party Inputs
Comment 6: Overrun Sales
Comment 7: Marine Insurance
Comment 8: Reviewable Entries
[FR Doc. 2017-18824 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
