Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper From Canada: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation, 41599-41603 [2017-18726]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act, 19 CFR 351.218, and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: August 28, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to
Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–18587 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–861]
Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper
From Canada: Initiation of Less-ThanFair-Value Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable September 1, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Tatarska at (202) 482–1562, AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
The Petition
On August 9, 2017, the U.S.
Department of Commerce (the
Department) received an antidumping
duty (AD) Petition concerning imports
of certain uncoated groundwood paper
(UGW paper) from Canada, filed in
proper form on behalf of North Pacific
Paper Company (NORPAC, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Aug 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
petitioner).1 The AD Petition was
accompanied by a countervailing duty
(CVD) Petition concerning imports of
UGW paper from Canada. The petitioner
is a domestic producer of UGW paper.2
On August 11, 2017, the Department
requested supplemental information
pertaining to certain areas of the
Petition.3 The petitioner filed responses
to these requests on August 15, 2017.4
On August 17, 2017, the Department
contacted the petitioner regarding the
proposed scope of the investigations.5
The petitioner filed revised scope
language on August 21, 2017.6 As
discussed below, on August 10, 2017,
the Department issued polling
questionnaires to all known U.S.
producers of UGW paper. The
Department received responses from all
recipients of the polling questionnaires.
In accordance with section 732(b) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), the petitioner alleges that imports
of UGW paper from Canada are being,
or are likely to be, sold in the United
States at less than fair value (LTFV)
within the meaning of section 731 of the
Act, and that such imports are
materially injuring, or threatening
material injury to, the domestic industry
producing UGW paper in the United
States. Also, consistent with section
732(b)(1) of the Act, the Petition is
accompanied by information reasonably
available to the petitioner supporting its
allegations.
The Department finds that the
petitioner filed this Petition on behalf of
the domestic industry because the
petitioner is an interested party as
1 See Letter from the petitioner ‘‘Certain Uncoated
Groundwood Paper from Canada—Petitions for the
Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties,’’ dated August 9, 2017 (the Petition).
2 See Volume I of the Petition, at 1.
3 See Letter to the petitioner from the Department,
‘‘Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada:
Supplemental Questions,’’ dated August 11, 2017
(General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire); see
also Letter from the Department, ‘‘Petition for the
Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of
Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada:
Supplemental Questions,’’ dated August 11, 2017
(AD Supplemental Questionnaire).
4 See ‘‘Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from
Canada/Responses to Supplemental Questions on
the Injury Volume of the Petition,’’ dated August
15, 2017 (General Issues Supplemental Response);
see also ‘‘Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper
from Canada/Petitioner’s Responses to
Supplemental Questions on the Antidumping Duty
Volume of the Petition,’’ dated August 15, 2017 (AD
Supplemental Response).
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Phone Call with Counsel to
the Petitioner,’’ dated August 17, 2017 (Scope
Phone Call).
6 See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from
the petitioner, ‘‘Certain Uncoated Groundwood
Paper from Canada/Further revisions to the Scope
Language,’’ dated August 21, 2017 (Scope Revision
Letter).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41599
defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act.
The Department also finds that the
petitioner demonstrated sufficient
industry support with respect to the
initiation of the AD investigation that
the petitioner is requesting.7
Period of Investigation
Because the Petition was filed on
August 9, 2017, the period of
investigation (POI) for this investigation
is July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is UGW paper from
Canada. For a full description of the
scope of this investigation, see the
‘‘Scope of the Investigation,’’ in the
Appendix to this notice.
Comments on Scope of the Investigation
During our review of the Petition, the
Department issued questions to, and
received responses from, the petitioner
pertaining to the proposed scope to
ensure that the scope language in the
Petition would be an accurate reflection
of the products for which the domestic
industry is seeking relief.8
As discussed in the preamble to the
Department’s regulations, we are setting
aside a period for interested parties to
raise issues regarding product coverage
(scope).9 The Department will consider
all comments received from interested
parties and, if necessary, will consult
with interested parties prior to the
issuance of the preliminary
determinations. If scope comments
include factual information,10 all such
factual information should be limited to
public information. To facilitate
preparation of its questionnaires, the
Department requests all interested
parties to submit such comments by
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on Monday,
September 18, 2017, which is 20
calendar days from the signature date of
this notice. Any rebuttal comments,
which may include factual information,
must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on
Thursday, September 28, 2017, which is
10 calendar days from the initial
comments deadline.11
The Department requests that any
factual information the parties consider
relevant to the scope of the investigation
be submitted during this time period.
7 See the ‘‘Determination of Industry Support for
the Petition’’ section, below.
8 See General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire;
see also General Issues Supplemental Response,
Scope Phone Call, and Scope Revision Letter.
9 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
10 See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ‘‘factual
information’’).
11 See 19 CFR 351.303(b).
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
41600
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices
However, if a party subsequently finds
that additional factual information
pertaining to the scope of the
investigation may be relevant, the party
may contact the Department and request
permission to submit the additional
information. All such comments must
be filed on the records of the concurrent
AD and CVD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to the Department
must be filed electronically using
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing
Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS).12 An electronically
filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by the time
and date it is due. Documents exempted
from the electronic submission
requirements must be filed manually
(i.e., in paper form) with Enforcement
and Compliance’s APO/Dockets Unit,
Room 18022, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230, and
stamped with the date and time of
receipt by the applicable deadlines.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Comments on Product Characteristics
for AD Questionnaires
The Department will provide
interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the appropriate physical
characteristics of UGW paper to be
reported in response to the
Department’s AD questionnaire. This
information will be used to identify the
key physical characteristics of the
merchandise under consideration in
order to report the relevant costs of
production accurately as well as to
develop appropriate productcomparison criteria.
Interested parties may provide any
information or comments that they feel
are relevant to the development of an
accurate list of physical characteristics.
Specifically, they may provide
comments as to which characteristics
are appropriate to use as: (1) General
product characteristics and (2) productcomparison criteria. We note that it is
not always appropriate to use all
product characteristics as productcomparison criteria. We base product12 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System
Name, 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014) for details
of the Department’s electronic filing requirements,
which went into effect on August 5, 2011.
Information on help using ACCESS can be found at
https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx and a handbook
can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help/
Handbook%20on%20Electronic%20Filling%20
Procedures.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Aug 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
comparison criteria on meaningful
commercial differences among products.
In other words, although there may be
some physical product characteristics
utilized by manufacturers to describe
UGW paper, it may be that only a select
few product characteristics take into
account commercially meaningful
physical characteristics. In addition,
interested parties may comment on the
order in which the physical
characteristics should be used in
matching products. Generally, the
Department attempts to list the most
important physical characteristics first
and the least important characteristics
last.
In order to consider the suggestions of
interested parties in developing and
issuing the AD questionnaires, all
product characteristics comments must
be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on September
18, 2017. Any rebuttal comments must
be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on September
28, 2017. All comments and
submissions to the Department must be
filed electronically using ACCESS, as
explained above, on the record of this
LTFV investigation.
Determination of Industry Support for
the Petition
Section 732(b)(1) of the Act requires
that a petition be filed on behalf of the
domestic industry. Section 732(c)(4)(A)
of the Act provides that a petition meets
this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the
petition account for: (i) At least 25
percent of the total production of the
domestic like product; and (ii) more
than 50 percent of the production of the
domestic like product produced by that
portion of the industry expressing
support for, or opposition to, the
petition. Moreover, section 732(c)(4)(D)
of the Act provides that, if the petition
does not establish support of domestic
producers or workers accounting for
more than 50 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product,
the Department shall: (i) Poll the
industry or rely on other information in
order to determine if there is support for
the petition, as required by
subparagraph (A); or (ii) determine
industry support using a statistically
valid sampling method to poll the
‘‘industry.’’
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines
the ‘‘industry’’ as the producers as a
whole of a domestic like product. Thus,
to determine whether a petition has the
requisite industry support, the statute
directs the Department to look to
producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The International
Trade Commission (ITC), which is
responsible for determining whether
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘the domestic industry’’ has been
injured, must also determine what
constitutes a domestic like product in
order to define the industry. While both
the Department and the ITC must apply
the same statutory definition regarding
the domestic like product,13 they do so
for different purposes and pursuant to a
separate and distinct authority. In
addition, the Department’s
determination is subject to limitations of
time and information. Although this
may result in different definitions of the
like product, such differences do not
render the decision of either agency
contrary to law.14
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the
domestic like product as ‘‘a product
which is like, or in the absence of like,
most similar in characteristics and uses
with, the article subject to an
investigation under this title.’’ Thus, the
reference point from which the
domestic like product analysis begins is
‘‘the article subject to an investigation’’
(i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to
be investigated, which normally will be
the scope as defined in the Petition).
With regard to the domestic like
product, the petitioner does not offer a
definition of the domestic like product
distinct from the scope of the
investigation. Based on our analysis of
the information submitted on the
record, we have determined that UGW
paper, as defined in the scope,
constitutes a single domestic like
product and we have analyzed industry
support in terms of that domestic like
product.15
Based on information provided in the
Petition, the share of total estimated
U.S. production of the domestic like
product in calendar year 2016
represented by the petitioner did not
account for more than 50 percent of the
total production of the domestic like
product. Therefore, in accordance with
section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act, we
polled the industry.16
On August 10, 2017, we issued
polling questionnaires to all known
13 See
section 771(10) of the Act.
USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp.
2d 1, 8 (CIT 2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd.
v. United States, 688 F. Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988),
aff’d 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
15 For a discussion of the domestic like product
analysis as applied to this case, see Antidumping
Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada (AD
Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II, Analysis of
Industry Support for the Petitions Covering Certain
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada
(Attachment II). This checklist is dated
concurrently with this notice and on file
electronically via ACCESS. Access to documents
filed via ACCESS is also available in the Central
Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building.
16 Id.
14 See
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
producers of UGW paper identified in
the Petition.17 We requested that each
company complete the polling
questionnaire and certify its response by
the due date specified in the cover letter
to the questionnaire.18 On August 23,
2017, in consultations with the
Department held with respect to the
companion CVD petition on imports of
UGW paper from Canada, the
Government of Canada (GOC) provided
comments on industry support.19
Section 732(c)(4)(B) of the Act states
that (i) the Department ‘‘shall disregard
the position of domestic producers who
oppose the petition if such producers
are related to foreign producers, as
defined in section 771(4)(B)(ii), unless
such domestic producers demonstrate
that their interests as domestic
producers would be adversely affected
by the imposition of an antidumping
duty order;’’ and (ii) the Department
‘‘may disregard the position of domestic
producers of a domestic like product
who are importers of the subject
merchandise.’’ In addition, 19 CFR
351.203(e)(4) states that the position of
a domestic producer that opposes the
petition (i) will be disregarded if such
producer is related to a foreign producer
or to a foreign exporter under section
771(4)(B)(ii) of the Act, unless such
domestic producer demonstrates to the
Secretary’s satisfaction that its interests
as a domestic producer would be
adversely affected by the imposition of
an antidumping order; and (ii) may be
disregarded if the producer is an
importer of the subject merchandise or
is related to such an importer under
section 771(4)(B)(ii) of the Act.
We received objection to the Petition
from those that produce domestic like
product and are related to a foreign
producer of subject merchandise and/or
who imported subject merchandise from
Canada. We have analyzed the
information provided in the polling
questionnaire responses and
information provided in other
submissions to the Department. Based
on our analysis, we disregarded the
position in opposition to the petition
17 See Volume I of the Petition, at Exhibit I–5; see
also Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Uncoated
Groundwood Paper from Canada: Polling
Questionnaire,’’ dated August 14, 2017.
18 For a detailed discussion of the responses
received, see AD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment
II. The polling questionnaire and questionnaire
responses are on file electronically via ACCESS and
can also be accessed through the CRU.
19 See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Petition on Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper
from Canada: GOC Consultations,’’ dated August
24, 2017; and letter from the GOC re: ‘‘Uncoated
Groundwood Paper from Canada: Submission of
Consultations Paper,’’ dated August 25, 2017. For
a discussion of the GOC’s comments, see the AD
Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Aug 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
pursuant to section 732(c)(4)(B) of the
Act. When the position in opposition to
the petition is disregarded, the industry
support requirements of section
732(c)(4)(A) of the Act are satisified.20
The data collected demonstrate that
the domestic producers of UGW paper
which support the Petition account for
at least 25 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product
and, once the opposition is disregarded,
account for more than 50 percent of the
production of the domestic like product
produced by that portion of the industry
expressing support for, or opposition to,
the Petition.21 Therefore, the
Department determines that the
petitioner filed this Petition on behalf of
the domestic industry in accordance
with section 732(b)(1) of the Act
because it is an interested party as
defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act
and it has demonstrated sufficient
industry support with respect to the AD
investigation that it is requesting the
Department initiate.22
Allegations and Evidence of Material
Injury and Causation
The petitioner alleges that the U.S.
industry producing the domestic like
product is being materially injured, or is
threatened with material injury, by
reason of the imports of the subject
merchandise sold at less than normal
value (NV). In addition, the petitioner
alleges that subject imports exceed the
negligibility threshold provided for
under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.23
The petitioner contends that the
industry’s injured condition is
illustrated by a significant volume of
subject imports and significant increase
in the volume of subject imports relative
to U.S. consumption; reduced market
share; underselling and price
suppression or depression; lost sales
and revenues; adverse effects on
production, capacity utilization, U.S.
shipments, and employment; declines
in financial performance; and capacity
closures and conversions.24 We have
assessed the allegations and supporting
evidence regarding material injury,
threat of material injury, and causation,
and we have determined that these
allegations are properly supported by
adequate evidence and meet the
statutory requirements for initiation.25
20 See
AD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
41601
Allegation of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value
The following is a description of the
allegation of sales at LTFV upon which
the Department based its decision to
initiate the AD investigation of imports
of UGW paper from Canada. The
sources of data for the deductions and
adjustments relating to U.S. price and
NV are discussed in greater detail in the
AD Initiation Checklist.
Export Price
The petitioner based the U.S. price on
export price (EP) using pricing
information related to UGW paper
produced in, and exported from,
Canada, and sold or offered for sale in
the United States. This information was
obtained from a confidential source.26
Where applicable, the petitioner made
deductions from U.S. price for
movement expenses, consistent with the
terms of sale.27
Normal Value
Petitioner based NV on pricing
information relating to UGW paper
produced in, and sold or offered for sale
in Canada, that was obtained through
confidential market research.28 Where
applicable, the petitioner made
deductions for movement expenses,
consistent with the terms of sale.29
Fair Value Comparisons
Based on the data provided by the
petitioner, there is reason to believe that
imports of UGW paper from Canada are
being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at LTFV. Based on
comparisons of EP to NV in accordance
with sections 772 and 773 of the Act,
the estimated dumping margins for
UGW paper from Canada covered by
this initiation range from 23.45 percent
to 54.97 percent.30
Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigation
Based upon the examination of the
Petition, we find that the Petition meets
the requirements of section 732 of the
Act. Therefore, we are initiating an AD
investigation to determine whether
imports of UGW paper from Canada are
being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at LTFV. In accordance
with section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed,
we will make our preliminary
21 Id.
22 Id.
23 See
Volume I of the Petition, at 19 and Exhibit
I–12.
24 Id., at 17–28, Exhibit I–3, Exhibit I–6, and
Exhibits I–11 through I–17.
25 See AD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment III,
Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material
Injury and Causation for the Antidumping and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Certain
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada.
26 See Volume III of the Petition at Exhibits III–
7 and III–8; and AD Initiation Checklist.
27 See AD Initiation Checklist.
28 Id.
29 Id.
30 Id.
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
41602
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices
electronically using ACCESS. An
electronically-filed document must be
received successfully, in its entirety, by
ACCESS no later than 5:00 p.m. ET by
the dates noted above. We intend to
make our decision regarding respondent
selection in this investigation within 20
days of publication of this notice.
Respondent Selection
The petitioner named eight
companies in Canada as producers/
exporters of UGW paper.34 Following
standard practice in AD investigations
involving market economy countries, in
the event the Department determines
that the number of companies in Canada
is large, the Department intends to
review U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports of
UGW paper during the POI under the
appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States subheadings, and if
it determines that it cannot individually
examine each company based upon the
Department’s resources, then the
Department will select respondents
based on those data. We intend to
release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
to all parties with access to information
protected by APO within five business
days of the announcement of the
initiation of this investigation.
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under APO
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b).
Instructions for filing such applications
may be found on the Department’s Web
site at https://enforcement.trade.gov/apo.
Interested parties may submit comments
regarding the CBP data and respondent
selection by 5:00 p.m. ET three calendar
days after publication. The Department
will not accept rebuttal comments
regarding the CBP data or respondent
selection. Comments must be filed
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
determination no later than 140 days
after the date of this initiation.
Under the Trade Preferences
Extension Act of 2015, numerous
amendments to the AD and CVD law
were made.31 The 2015 law does not
specify dates of application for those
amendments. On August 6, 2015, the
Department published an interpretative
rule, in which it announced the
applicability dates for each amendment
to the Act, except for amendments
contained in section 771(7) of the Act,
which relate to determinations of
material injury by the ITC.32 The
amendments to sections 771(15), 773,
776, and 782 of the Act are applicable
to all determinations made on or after
August 6, 2015, and, therefore, apply to
this AD investigation.33
ITC Notification
31 See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015,
Pub. L. 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015).
32 See Dates of Application of Amendments to the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws Made
by the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, 80
FR 46793 (August 6, 2015).
33 Id. at 46794–95. The 2015 amendments may be
found at https://www.congress.gov/bill/114thcongress/house-bill/1295/text/pl.
34 See Volume I of the Petition at Exhibit I–9.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Aug 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
Distribution of Copies of the Petition
In accordance with section
732(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), copies of the public version
of the Petition have been provided to
the GOC via ACCESS. To the extent
practicable, we will attempt to provide
a copy of the public version of the
Petition to each exporter named in the
Petition, as provided under 19 CFR
351.203(c)(2).
We will notify the ITC of our
initiation, as required by section 732(d)
of the Act.
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine,
within 45 days after the date on which
the Petition was filed, whether there is
a reasonable indication that imports of
UGW paper from Canada are materially
injuring or threatening material injury to
a U.S. industry. A negative ITC
determination will result in the
investigation being terminated.35
Otherwise, the investigation will
proceed according to statutory and
regulatory time limits.
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19
CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) Evidence
submitted in response to questionnaires;
(ii) evidence submitted in support of
allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors under 19
CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR
351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on
the record by the Department; and (v)
evidence other than factual information
described in (i)–(iv). 19 CFR 351.301(b)
requires any party, when submitting
factual information, to specify under
which subsection of 19 CFR
351.102(b)(21) the information is being
submitted 36 and, if the information is
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct
factual information already on the
record, to provide an explanation
identifying the information already on
the record that the factual information
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct.37 Time
limits for the submission of factual
35 See
section 733(a) of the Act.
19 CFR 351.301(b).
37 See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
36 See
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information are addressed in 19 CFR
351.301, which provides specific time
limits based on the type of factual
information being submitted. Interested
parties should review the regulations
prior to submitting factual information
in this investigation.
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of
time limits before the expiration of a
time limit established under 19 CFR
351.301, or as otherwise specified by the
Secretary. In general, an extension
request will be considered untimely if it
is filed after the expiration of the time
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301.
For submissions that are due from
multiple parties simultaneously, an
extension request will be considered
untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET
on the due date. Under certain
circumstances, we may elect to specify
a different time limit by which
extension requests will be considered
untimely for submissions which are due
from multiple parties simultaneously. In
such a case, we will inform parties in
the letter or memorandum setting forth
the deadline (including a specified time)
by which extension requests must be
filed to be considered timely. An
extension request must be made in a
separate, stand-alone submission; under
limited circumstances we will grant
untimely-filed requests for the extension
of time limits. Parties should review
Extension of Time Limits; Final Rule, 78
FR 57790 (September 20, 2013),
available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/
pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/201322853.htm, prior to submitting factual
information in this investigation.
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual
information in an AD or CVD
proceeding must certify to the accuracy
and completeness of that information.38
Parties are hereby reminded that revised
certification requirements are in effect
for company/government officials, as
well as their representatives.
Investigations initiated on the basis of
petitions filed on or after August 16,
2013, and other segments of any AD or
CVD proceedings initiated on or after
August 16, 2013, should use the formats
for the revised certifications provided at
the end of the Final Rule.39 The
Department intends to reject factual
38 See
section 782(b) of the Act.
Certification of Factual Information to
Import Administration during Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July
17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also frequently asked
questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
39 See
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices
submissions if the submitting party does
not comply with applicable revised
certification requirements.
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under APO
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On
January 22, 2008, the Department
published Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Documents Submission Procedures;
APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January
22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate
in this investigation should ensure that
they meet the requirements of these
procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of
appearance as discussed at 19 CFR
351.103(d)).
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to sections 732(c)(2) and 777(i)
of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: August 29, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix—Scope of the Investigation
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
The merchandise covered by this
investigation includes certain paper that has
not been coated on either side and with 50
percent or more of the cellulose fiber content
consisting of groundwood pulp, including
groundwood pulp made from recycled paper,
weighing not more than 90 grams per square
meter. Groundwood pulp includes all forms
of pulp produced from a mechanical pulping
process, such as thermo-mechanical process
(TMP), chemi-thermo mechanical process
(CTMP), bleached chemi-thermo mechanical
process (BCTMP) or any other mechanical
pulping process. The scope includes paper
shipped in any form, including but not
limited to both rolls and sheets.
Certain uncoated groundwood paper
includes but is not limited to standard
newsprint, high bright newsprint, book
publishing, directory, and printing and
writing papers. The scope includes paper
that is white, off-white, cream, or colored.
Specifically excluded from the scope are
imports of certain uncoated groundwood
paper printed with final content of printed
text or graphic. Also excluded are papers that
otherwise meet this definition, but which
have undergone a supercalendering
process.40
Certain uncoated groundwood paper is
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) in
several subheadings, including 4801.00.0120,
40 Supercalendering imparts a glossy finish
produced by the movement of the paper web
through a supercalender which is a stack of
alternating rollers of metal and cotton (or other
softer material). The supercalender runs at high
speed and applies pressure, heat, and friction
which glazes the surface of the paper, imparting
gloss to the surface and increasing the paper’s
smoothness and density.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Aug 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
4801.00.0140, 4802.61.1000, 4802.61.2000,
4802.61.3110, 4802.61.3191, 4802.61.6040,
4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000,
4802.62.6140, 4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000,
and 4802.69.3000. Subject merchandise may
also be imported under several additional
subheadings including 4805.91.5000,
4805.91.7000, and 4805.91.9000. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise is
dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2017–18726 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–122–862]
Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper
From Canada: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable September 1, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Crespo at (202) 482–3693, or
Whitley Herndon at (202) 482–6274,
Office II, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
The Petition
On August 9, 2017, the U.S.
Department of Commerce (the
Department) received a countervailing
duty (CVD) Petition concerning imports
of certain uncoated groundwood paper
(UGW paper) from Canada, filed in
proper form on behalf of North Pacific
Paper Company (NORPAC, or the
petitioner).1 The CVD Petition was
accompanied by an antidumping duty
(AD) Petition concerning imports of
UGW paper from Canada. The petitioner
is a domestic producer of UGW paper.2
On August 11 and 14, 2017, the
Department requested supplemental
information pertaining to certain areas
of the Petition.3 The petitioner filed
1 See Letter from the petitioner re: ‘‘Petitions for
the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties on Uncoated Groundwood Paper from
Canada,’’ dated August 9, 2017 (the Petition).
2 Id., Volume I of the Petition, at 1.
3 See Department Letter re: Petitions for the
Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties on Imports of Certain Uncoated Groundwood
Paper from Canada: Supplemental Questions, dated
August 11, 2017 (General Issues Supplemental
Questionnaire); see also Department Letter re:
Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties
on Imports of Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper
from Canada, dated August 14, 2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41603
responses to these requests on August
15 and 16, 2017.4 On August 17, 2017,
the Department contacted the petitioner
regarding the proposed scope of the
investigations.5 The petitioner filed
revised scope language on August 21,
2017.6 As discussed below, on August
10, 2017, the Department issued polling
questionnaires to all known U.S.
producers of UGW paper. The
Department received responses from all
recipients of the polling questionnaires.
In accordance with section 702(b)(1)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), the petitioner alleges that the
Government of Canada (GOC) and the
provincial governments of Alberta
(GOA), British Colombia (GBS),
Newfoundland and Labrador (GNL),
Ontario (GOO), Quebec (GOQ), and New
Brunswick (GNB) are providing
countervailable subsidies, within the
meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of
the Act, to imports of UGW paper from
Canada and that such imports are
materially injuring, or threatening
material injury to, the domestic industry
producing UGW paper in the United
States. Also, consistent with section
702(b)(1) of the Act, for those alleged
programs on which we are initiating a
CVD investigation, the Petition is
accompanied by information reasonably
available to the petitioner supporting its
allegations.
The Department finds that the
petitioner filed this Petition on behalf of
the domestic industry because the
petitioner is an interested party as
defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act.
The Department also finds that the
petitioner demonstrated sufficient
industry support with respect to the
initiation of the CVD investigation that
the petitioner is requesting.7
Period of Investigation
Because the Petition was filed on
August 9, 2017, the period of
investigation (POI) is January 1, 2016,
through December 31, 2016.
4 See Letter from the petitioner re: Certain
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada/
Responses to Supplemental Questions on the Injury
Volume of the Petitions, dated August 15, 2017
(General Issues Supplemental Response); see also
Letter from the petitioner re: Certain Uncoated
Groundwood Paper from Canada/Petitioner’s
Responses to Supplemental Questions on the
Countervailing Duty Volume of the Petition, dated
August 16, 2017 (CVD Supplement).
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Phone Call with Counsel to
the Petitioner,’’ dated August 17, 2017 (Scope
Phone Call).
6 See Letter from the petitioner re: Certain
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada/Further
Revisions to The Scope Language, dated August 21,
2017 (Scope Revision Letter).
7 See the ‘‘Determination of Industry Support for
the Petition’’ section, below.
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41599-41603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18726]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-122-861]
Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper From Canada: Initiation of
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable September 1, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Tatarska at (202) 482-1562, AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On August 9, 2017, the U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department)
received an antidumping duty (AD) Petition concerning imports of
certain uncoated groundwood paper (UGW paper) from Canada, filed in
proper form on behalf of North Pacific Paper Company (NORPAC, the
petitioner).\1\ The AD Petition was accompanied by a countervailing
duty (CVD) Petition concerning imports of UGW paper from Canada. The
petitioner is a domestic producer of UGW paper.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Letter from the petitioner ``Certain Uncoated Groundwood
Paper from Canada--Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duties,'' dated August 9, 2017 (the Petition).
\2\ See Volume I of the Petition, at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 11, 2017, the Department requested supplemental
information pertaining to certain areas of the Petition.\3\ The
petitioner filed responses to these requests on August 15, 2017.\4\ On
August 17, 2017, the Department contacted the petitioner regarding the
proposed scope of the investigations.\5\ The petitioner filed revised
scope language on August 21, 2017.\6\ As discussed below, on August 10,
2017, the Department issued polling questionnaires to all known U.S.
producers of UGW paper. The Department received responses from all
recipients of the polling questionnaires.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Letter to the petitioner from the Department,
``Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties on Imports of Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada:
Supplemental Questions,'' dated August 11, 2017 (General Issues
Supplemental Questionnaire); see also Letter from the Department,
``Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of
Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada: Supplemental
Questions,'' dated August 11, 2017 (AD Supplemental Questionnaire).
\4\ See ``Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada/
Responses to Supplemental Questions on the Injury Volume of the
Petition,'' dated August 15, 2017 (General Issues Supplemental
Response); see also ``Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada/
Petitioner's Responses to Supplemental Questions on the Antidumping
Duty Volume of the Petition,'' dated August 15, 2017 (AD
Supplemental Response).
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Phone Call with Counsel to the
Petitioner,'' dated August 17, 2017 (Scope Phone Call).
\6\ See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from the petitioner,
``Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada/Further revisions to
the Scope Language,'' dated August 21, 2017 (Scope Revision Letter).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 732(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the petitioner alleges that imports of UGW paper
from Canada are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States
at less than fair value (LTFV) within the meaning of section 731 of the
Act, and that such imports are materially injuring, or threatening
material injury to, the domestic industry producing UGW paper in the
United States. Also, consistent with section 732(b)(1) of the Act, the
Petition is accompanied by information reasonably available to the
petitioner supporting its allegations.
The Department finds that the petitioner filed this Petition on
behalf of the domestic industry because the petitioner is an interested
party as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act. The Department also
finds that the petitioner demonstrated sufficient industry support with
respect to the initiation of the AD investigation that the petitioner
is requesting.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See the ``Determination of Industry Support for the
Petition'' section, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation
Because the Petition was filed on August 9, 2017, the period of
investigation (POI) for this investigation is July 1, 2016, through
June 30, 2017.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is UGW paper from Canada.
For a full description of the scope of this investigation, see the
``Scope of the Investigation,'' in the Appendix to this notice.
Comments on Scope of the Investigation
During our review of the Petition, the Department issued questions
to, and received responses from, the petitioner pertaining to the
proposed scope to ensure that the scope language in the Petition would
be an accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic
industry is seeking relief.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire; see also
General Issues Supplemental Response, Scope Phone Call, and Scope
Revision Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the preamble to the Department's regulations, we
are setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues
regarding product coverage (scope).\9\ The Department will consider all
comments received from interested parties and, if necessary, will
consult with interested parties prior to the issuance of the
preliminary determinations. If scope comments include factual
information,\10\ all such factual information should be limited to
public information. To facilitate preparation of its questionnaires,
the Department requests all interested parties to submit such comments
by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on Monday, September 18, 2017, which is
20 calendar days from the signature date of this notice. Any rebuttal
comments, which may include factual information, must be filed by 5:00
p.m. ET on Thursday, September 28, 2017, which is 10 calendar days from
the initial comments deadline.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual
information'').
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department requests that any factual information the parties
consider relevant to the scope of the investigation be submitted during
this time period.
[[Page 41600]]
However, if a party subsequently finds that additional factual
information pertaining to the scope of the investigation may be
relevant, the party may contact the Department and request permission
to submit the additional information. All such comments must be filed
on the records of the concurrent AD and CVD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to the Department must be filed electronically
using Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\12\ An
electronically filed document must be received successfully in its
entirety by the time and date it is due. Documents exempted from the
electronic submission requirements must be filed manually (i.e., in
paper form) with Enforcement and Compliance's APO/Dockets Unit, Room
18022, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, and stamped with the date and time of receipt by
the applicable deadlines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014) for details of the Department's electronic
filing requirements, which went into effect on August 5, 2011.
Information on help using ACCESS can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx and a handbook can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook%20on%20Electronic%20Filling%20Procedures.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on Product Characteristics for AD Questionnaires
The Department will provide interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the appropriate physical characteristics of UGW paper to be
reported in response to the Department's AD questionnaire. This
information will be used to identify the key physical characteristics
of the merchandise under consideration in order to report the relevant
costs of production accurately as well as to develop appropriate
product-comparison criteria.
Interested parties may provide any information or comments that
they feel are relevant to the development of an accurate list of
physical characteristics. Specifically, they may provide comments as to
which characteristics are appropriate to use as: (1) General product
characteristics and (2) product-comparison criteria. We note that it is
not always appropriate to use all product characteristics as product-
comparison criteria. We base product-comparison criteria on meaningful
commercial differences among products. In other words, although there
may be some physical product characteristics utilized by manufacturers
to describe UGW paper, it may be that only a select few product
characteristics take into account commercially meaningful physical
characteristics. In addition, interested parties may comment on the
order in which the physical characteristics should be used in matching
products. Generally, the Department attempts to list the most important
physical characteristics first and the least important characteristics
last.
In order to consider the suggestions of interested parties in
developing and issuing the AD questionnaires, all product
characteristics comments must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on September 18,
2017. Any rebuttal comments must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on September
28, 2017. All comments and submissions to the Department must be filed
electronically using ACCESS, as explained above, on the record of this
LTFV investigation.
Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
Section 732(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) At least
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 732(c)(4)(D) of
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like product, the Department
shall: (i) Poll the industry or rely on other information in order to
determine if there is support for the petition, as required by
subparagraph (A); or (ii) determine industry support using a
statistically valid sampling method to poll the ``industry.''
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute
directs the Department to look to producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The International Trade Commission (ITC), which
is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' has
been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like
product in order to define the industry. While both the Department and
the ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic
like product,\13\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a
separate and distinct authority. In addition, the Department's
determination is subject to limitations of time and information.
Although this may result in different definitions of the like product,
such differences do not render the decision of either agency contrary
to law.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
\14\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the
Petition).
With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope
of the investigation. Based on our analysis of the information
submitted on the record, we have determined that UGW paper, as defined
in the scope, constitutes a single domestic like product and we have
analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like product.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as
applied to this case, see Antidumping Duty Investigation Initiation
Checklist: Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada (AD
Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II, Analysis of Industry
Support for the Petitions Covering Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper
from Canada (Attachment II). This checklist is dated concurrently
with this notice and on file electronically via ACCESS. Access to
documents filed via ACCESS is also available in the Central Records
Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on information provided in the Petition, the share of total
estimated U.S. production of the domestic like product in calendar year
2016 represented by the petitioner did not account for more than 50
percent of the total production of the domestic like product.
Therefore, in accordance with section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act, we
polled the industry.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 10, 2017, we issued polling questionnaires to all known
[[Page 41601]]
producers of UGW paper identified in the Petition.\17\ We requested
that each company complete the polling questionnaire and certify its
response by the due date specified in the cover letter to the
questionnaire.\18\ On August 23, 2017, in consultations with the
Department held with respect to the companion CVD petition on imports
of UGW paper from Canada, the Government of Canada (GOC) provided
comments on industry support.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Volume I of the Petition, at Exhibit I-5; see also
Memorandum, ``Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada: Polling
Questionnaire,'' dated August 14, 2017.
\18\ For a detailed discussion of the responses received, see AD
Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II. The polling questionnaire
and questionnaire responses are on file electronically via ACCESS
and can also be accessed through the CRU.
\19\ See Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty Petition on Certain
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada: GOC Consultations,'' dated
August 24, 2017; and letter from the GOC re: ``Uncoated Groundwood
Paper from Canada: Submission of Consultations Paper,'' dated August
25, 2017. For a discussion of the GOC's comments, see the AD
Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 732(c)(4)(B) of the Act states that (i) the Department
``shall disregard the position of domestic producers who oppose the
petition if such producers are related to foreign producers, as defined
in section 771(4)(B)(ii), unless such domestic producers demonstrate
that their interests as domestic producers would be adversely affected
by the imposition of an antidumping duty order;'' and (ii) the
Department ``may disregard the position of domestic producers of a
domestic like product who are importers of the subject merchandise.''
In addition, 19 CFR 351.203(e)(4) states that the position of a
domestic producer that opposes the petition (i) will be disregarded if
such producer is related to a foreign producer or to a foreign exporter
under section 771(4)(B)(ii) of the Act, unless such domestic producer
demonstrates to the Secretary's satisfaction that its interests as a
domestic producer would be adversely affected by the imposition of an
antidumping order; and (ii) may be disregarded if the producer is an
importer of the subject merchandise or is related to such an importer
under section 771(4)(B)(ii) of the Act.
We received objection to the Petition from those that produce
domestic like product and are related to a foreign producer of subject
merchandise and/or who imported subject merchandise from Canada. We
have analyzed the information provided in the polling questionnaire
responses and information provided in other submissions to the
Department. Based on our analysis, we disregarded the position in
opposition to the petition pursuant to section 732(c)(4)(B) of the Act.
When the position in opposition to the petition is disregarded, the
industry support requirements of section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act are
satisified.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See AD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The data collected demonstrate that the domestic producers of UGW
paper which support the Petition account for at least 25 percent of the
total production of the domestic like product and, once the opposition
is disregarded, account for more than 50 percent of the production of
the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry
expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petition.\21\ Therefore,
the Department determines that the petitioner filed this Petition on
behalf of the domestic industry in accordance with section 732(b)(1) of
the Act because it is an interested party as defined in section
771(9)(C) of the Act and it has demonstrated sufficient industry
support with respect to the AD investigation that it is requesting the
Department initiate.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Id.
\22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
The petitioner alleges that the U.S. industry producing the
domestic like product is being materially injured, or is threatened
with material injury, by reason of the imports of the subject
merchandise sold at less than normal value (NV). In addition, the
petitioner alleges that subject imports exceed the negligibility
threshold provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Volume I of the Petition, at 19 and Exhibit I-12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is
illustrated by a significant volume of subject imports and significant
increase in the volume of subject imports relative to U.S. consumption;
reduced market share; underselling and price suppression or depression;
lost sales and revenues; adverse effects on production, capacity
utilization, U.S. shipments, and employment; declines in financial
performance; and capacity closures and conversions.\24\ We have
assessed the allegations and supporting evidence regarding material
injury, threat of material injury, and causation, and we have
determined that these allegations are properly supported by adequate
evidence and meet the statutory requirements for initiation.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Id., at 17-28, Exhibit I-3, Exhibit I-6, and Exhibits I-11
through I-17.
\25\ See AD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment III, Analysis of
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation for the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Certain
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allegation of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
The following is a description of the allegation of sales at LTFV
upon which the Department based its decision to initiate the AD
investigation of imports of UGW paper from Canada. The sources of data
for the deductions and adjustments relating to U.S. price and NV are
discussed in greater detail in the AD Initiation Checklist.
Export Price
The petitioner based the U.S. price on export price (EP) using
pricing information related to UGW paper produced in, and exported
from, Canada, and sold or offered for sale in the United States. This
information was obtained from a confidential source.\26\ Where
applicable, the petitioner made deductions from U.S. price for movement
expenses, consistent with the terms of sale.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Volume III of the Petition at Exhibits III-7 and III-8;
and AD Initiation Checklist.
\27\ See AD Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Normal Value
Petitioner based NV on pricing information relating to UGW paper
produced in, and sold or offered for sale in Canada, that was obtained
through confidential market research.\28\ Where applicable, the
petitioner made deductions for movement expenses, consistent with the
terms of sale.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ Id.
\29\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair Value Comparisons
Based on the data provided by the petitioner, there is reason to
believe that imports of UGW paper from Canada are being, or are likely
to be, sold in the United States at LTFV. Based on comparisons of EP to
NV in accordance with sections 772 and 773 of the Act, the estimated
dumping margins for UGW paper from Canada covered by this initiation
range from 23.45 percent to 54.97 percent.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation
Based upon the examination of the Petition, we find that the
Petition meets the requirements of section 732 of the Act. Therefore,
we are initiating an AD investigation to determine whether imports of
UGW paper from Canada are being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at LTFV. In accordance with section 733(b)(1)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our
preliminary
[[Page 41602]]
determination no later than 140 days after the date of this initiation.
Under the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, numerous
amendments to the AD and CVD law were made.\31\ The 2015 law does not
specify dates of application for those amendments. On August 6, 2015,
the Department published an interpretative rule, in which it announced
the applicability dates for each amendment to the Act, except for
amendments contained in section 771(7) of the Act, which relate to
determinations of material injury by the ITC.\32\ The amendments to
sections 771(15), 773, 776, and 782 of the Act are applicable to all
determinations made on or after August 6, 2015, and, therefore, apply
to this AD investigation.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, Pub. L. 114-
27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015).
\32\ See Dates of Application of Amendments to the Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Laws Made by the Trade Preferences Extension
Act of 2015, 80 FR 46793 (August 6, 2015).
\33\ Id. at 46794-95. The 2015 amendments may be found at
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1295/text/pl.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respondent Selection
The petitioner named eight companies in Canada as producers/
exporters of UGW paper.\34\ Following standard practice in AD
investigations involving market economy countries, in the event the
Department determines that the number of companies in Canada is large,
the Department intends to review U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) data for U.S. imports of UGW paper during the POI under the
appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
subheadings, and if it determines that it cannot individually examine
each company based upon the Department's resources, then the Department
will select respondents based on those data. We intend to release the
CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (APO) to all parties
with access to information protected by APO within five business days
of the announcement of the initiation of this investigation. Interested
parties must submit applications for disclosure under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(b). Instructions for filing such applications may
be found on the Department's Web site at https://enforcement.trade.gov/apo. Interested parties may submit comments regarding the CBP data and
respondent selection by 5:00 p.m. ET three calendar days after
publication. The Department will not accept rebuttal comments regarding
the CBP data or respondent selection. Comments must be filed
electronically using ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be
received successfully, in its entirety, by ACCESS no later than 5:00
p.m. ET by the dates noted above. We intend to make our decision
regarding respondent selection in this investigation within 20 days of
publication of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See Volume I of the Petition at Exhibit I-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distribution of Copies of the Petition
In accordance with section 732(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), copies of the public version of the Petition have been
provided to the GOC via ACCESS. To the extent practicable, we will
attempt to provide a copy of the public version of the Petition to each
exporter named in the Petition, as provided under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
We will notify the ITC of our initiation, as required by section
732(d) of the Act.
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date
on which the Petition was filed, whether there is a reasonable
indication that imports of UGW paper from Canada are materially
injuring or threatening material injury to a U.S. industry. A negative
ITC determination will result in the investigation being
terminated.\35\ Otherwise, the investigation will proceed according to
statutory and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ See section 733(a) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i)
Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence
placed on the record by the Department; and (v) evidence other than
factual information described in (i)-(iv). 19 CFR 351.301(b) requires
any party, when submitting factual information, to specify under which
subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted
\36\ and, if the information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct
factual information already on the record, to provide an explanation
identifying the information already on the record that the factual
information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct.\37\ Time limits for
the submission of factual information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301,
which provides specific time limits based on the type of factual
information being submitted. Interested parties should review the
regulations prior to submitting factual information in this
investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
\37\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of time limits before the
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as
otherwise specified by the Secretary. In general, an extension request
will be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the
time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301. For submissions that are
due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be
considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date.
Under certain circumstances, we may elect to specify a different time
limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for
submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such
a case, we will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting
forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension
requests must be filed to be considered timely. An extension request
must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission; under limited
circumstances we will grant untimely-filed requests for the extension
of time limits. Parties should review Extension of Time Limits; Final
Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013), available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to
submitting factual information in this investigation.
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\38\
Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are
in effect for company/government officials, as well as their
representatives. Investigations initiated on the basis of petitions
filed on or after August 16, 2013, and other segments of any AD or CVD
proceedings initiated on or after August 16, 2013, should use the
formats for the revised certifications provided at the end of the Final
Rule.\39\ The Department intends to reject factual
[[Page 41603]]
submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable
revised certification requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
\39\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration during Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On January 22, 2008, the
Department published Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January
22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate in this investigation should
ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the
filing of letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)).
This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 732(c)(2)
and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: August 29, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation includes certain
paper that has not been coated on either side and with 50 percent or
more of the cellulose fiber content consisting of groundwood pulp,
including groundwood pulp made from recycled paper, weighing not
more than 90 grams per square meter. Groundwood pulp includes all
forms of pulp produced from a mechanical pulping process, such as
thermo-mechanical process (TMP), chemi-thermo mechanical process
(CTMP), bleached chemi-thermo mechanical process (BCTMP) or any
other mechanical pulping process. The scope includes paper shipped
in any form, including but not limited to both rolls and sheets.
Certain uncoated groundwood paper includes but is not limited to
standard newsprint, high bright newsprint, book publishing,
directory, and printing and writing papers. The scope includes paper
that is white, off-white, cream, or colored.
Specifically excluded from the scope are imports of certain
uncoated groundwood paper printed with final content of printed text
or graphic. Also excluded are papers that otherwise meet this
definition, but which have undergone a supercalendering process.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ Supercalendering imparts a glossy finish produced by the
movement of the paper web through a supercalender which is a stack
of alternating rollers of metal and cotton (or other softer
material). The supercalender runs at high speed and applies
pressure, heat, and friction which glazes the surface of the paper,
imparting gloss to the surface and increasing the paper's smoothness
and density.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certain uncoated groundwood paper is classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) in several
subheadings, including 4801.00.0120, 4801.00.0140, 4802.61.1000,
4802.61.2000, 4802.61.3110, 4802.61.3191, 4802.61.6040,
4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, 4802.62.6140,
4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, and 4802.69.3000. Subject merchandise
may also be imported under several additional subheadings including
4805.91.5000, 4805.91.7000, and 4805.91.9000. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2017-18726 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P