Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Address the Application of Rule 11140 in Connection With the Implementation of the Shortened Settlement Cycle (T+2) on September 5, 2017, 40604-40606 [2017-17999]
Download as PDF
40604
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices
6. Pending Projects.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Information on the meeting may be
obtained from Catherine F. I. Andrade at
(202) 336–8768, or via email at
Catherine.Andrade@opic.gov.
Dated: August 22, 2017.
Catherine Andrade,
Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private
Investment Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2017–18143 Filed 8–23–17; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3210–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2017–174 and CP2017–275;
MC2017–175 and CP2017–276; MC2017–176
and CP2017–277; MC2017–177 and CP2017–
278]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
negotiated service agreements. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: August 28,
2017.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
The Commission gives notice that the
Postal Service filed request(s) for the
Commission to consider matters related
to negotiated service agreement(s). The
request(s) may propose the addition or
removal of a negotiated service
agreement from the market dominant or
the competitive product list, or the
modification of an existing product
currently appearing on the market
dominant or the competitive product
list.
Section II identifies the docket
number(s) associated with each Postal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Aug 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
Service request, the title of each Postal
Service request, the request’s acceptance
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any,
can be accessed through compliance
with the requirements of 39 CFR
3007.40.
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s request(s)
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent
with the policies of title 39. For
request(s) that the Postal Service states
concern market dominant product(s),
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3010, and 39
CFR part 3020, subpart B. For request(s)
that the Postal Service states concern
competitive product(s), applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633,
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and
39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comment
deadline(s) for each request appear in
section II.
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
1. Docket No(s).: MC2017–174 and
CP2017–275; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail & First-Class Package
Service Contract 52 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing (Under
Seal) of Unredacted Governors’
Decision, Contract, and Supporting
Data; Filing Acceptance Date: August
18, 2017; Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30; Public
Representative: Kenneth R. Moeller;
Comments Due: August 28, 2017.
2. Docket No(s).: MC2017–175 and
CP2017–276; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail & First-Class Package
Service Contract 53 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing (Under
Seal) of Unredacted Governors’
Decision, Contract, and Supporting
Data; Filing Acceptance Date: August
18, 2017; Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30; Public
Representative: Kenneth R. Moeller;
Comments Due: August 28, 2017.
3. Docket No(s).: MC2017–176 and
CP2017–277; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail Contract 342 to
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Competitive Product List and Notice of
Filing (Under Seal) of Unredacted
Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data; Filing Acceptance
Date: August 18, 2017; Filing Authority:
39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30;
Public Representative: Christopher C.
Mohr; Comments Due: August 28, 2017.
4. Docket No(s).: MC2017–177 and
CP2017–278; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail &
First-Class Package Service Contract 22
to Competitive Product List and Notice
of Filing (Under Seal) of Unredacted
Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data; Filing Acceptance
Date: August 18, 2017; Filing Authority:
39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30;
Public Representative: Christopher C.
Mohr; Comments Due: August 28, 2017.
This notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–17981 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–81446; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2017–084]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Address the
Application of Rule 11140 in
Connection With the Implementation of
the Shortened Settlement Cycle (T+2)
on September 5, 2017
August 21, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
18, 2017, The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II, below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to address the
application of Rule 11140 as it relates to
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
25AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices
the ex-dividend date in connection with
the implementation of the T+2
settlement cycle on September 5, 2017.
No change to the text of Rule 11140
is required by this proposal.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to address
the application of Rule 11140
(Transactions in Securities ‘‘ExDividend,’’ ‘‘Ex-Rights’’ or ‘‘ExWarrants’’) as it relates to the exdividend date in connection with the
implementation of the trade date plus
two business days (T+2) settlement
cycle on September 5, 2017.
On September 28, 2016, following a
recommendation by the securities
industry, the Commission proposed
amending Exchange Act Rule 15c6–
1(a) 3 to shorten the standard settlement
cycle for most broker-dealer transactions
from trade date plus three business days
(T+3) to T+2.4 The rationale for this
proposal was that the shorter settlement
cycle would reduce the risks that arise
from the value and number of unsettled
securities transactions prior to the
completion of settlement, including
credit, market, and liquidity risk
directly faced by U.S. market
participants.5 The SEC adopted the
proposed changes to Rule 15c6–1(a) on
March 22, 2017.6
In connection with the amendments
to Rule 15c6–1(a) and the adoption of
the shortened settlement cycle, Nasdaq
submitted a proposed rule change
implementing the new settlement cycle
3 17
CFR 240.15c6–1(a).
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78962
(September 28, 2016), 81 FR 69240 (October 5,
2016) (Amendment to Securities Transaction
Settlement Cycle) (File No. S7–22–16).
5 Id.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80295
(March 22, 2017), 82 FR 15564 (March 29, 2017)
(File No. S7–22–16).
4 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Aug 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
and making corresponding changes to
its applicable rules, including Rule
11140(b).7
The industry and self-regulatory
organizations (‘‘SROs’’), including The
Depository Trust Company (‘‘DTC’’),
which processes corporate action
events, have raised concern that the
September 5, 2017 industry-wide
transition date from T+3 to T+2 will
result in September 7, 2017 being a
‘‘double’’ settlement date for trades that
occur on September 1, 2017 (under T+3
and reflecting the Labor Day holiday on
September 4, 2017) and trades that
occur on September 5, 2017 (under
T+2), which generally will result in
investors who trade on either date being
deemed a record holder of September 7,
2017. In order to avoid confusion about
the proper settlement date and to
coordinate with other SROs, Nasdaq and
the other SROs have agreed that no
securities will be ex-dividend on
September 5, 2017.
The Exchange is therefore now
proposing to address the application of
Rule 11140(b) as it relates to the exdividend date in connection with the
implementation of the T+2 settlement
cycle on September 5, 2017.
The ex-dividend date is the date on
which a security is first traded without
the right to receive a distribution of
cash, stock or warrants. Rule 11140(b)(1)
establishes the ‘‘ex-dividend date’’ for
‘‘normal’’ distributions of cash, stock or
warrants. The rule provides that, in
respect to cash dividends or
distributions, or stock dividends, and
the issuance or distribution of warrants,
which are less than 25% of the value of
the subject security, if the definitive
information is received sufficiently in
advance of the record date,8 the date
designated as the ‘‘ex-dividend date’’
shall be the second business day
preceding the record date if the record
date falls on a business day, or the third
business day preceding the record date
if the record date falls on a day
designated by Nasdaq Regulation as a
non-delivery date.
Rule 11140(b)(2) establishes the exdividend date with respect to ‘‘large’’
distributions, e.g., cash dividends or
distributions, stock dividends and/or
splits, and the distribution of warrants,
which are 25% or greater of the value
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79687
(December 23, 2016), 81 FR 96545 (December 30,
2016) (Order approving SR–NASDAQ–2016–183).
8 The record date is ‘‘the date fixed by the trustee,
registrar, paying agent or issuer for the purpose of
determining the holders of equity securities, bonds,
similar evidences of indebtedness or unit
investment trust securities entitled to receive
dividends, interest or principal payments or any
other distributions.’’ See Rule 11120(e).
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40605
of the subject security. In this case, the
ex-dividend date is the first business
day following the payable date.9
Consistent with the compliance date
of the amendments to Rule 15c6–1(a),
the securities industry has adopted
Tuesday, September 5, 2017 as the
implementation date of the T+2
settlement cycle.10 With the
implementation of the T+2 settlement
cycle, the ex-dividend date for ‘‘normal’’
distributions pursuant to Rule
11140(b)(1) will be the first business day
before the record date.11 Accordingly,
Nasdaq proposes to interpret Rule
11140(b)(1) so that the first record date
to which this new ex-dividend date
rationale will be applied will be
Thursday, September 7, 2017. During
the implementation of the T+2
settlement cycle, the ‘‘regular’’ exdividend dates will be as follows:
Record Date 9/1/2017 Ex date 8/30/2017
Record Date 9/5/2017 Ex date 8/31/2017
Record Date 9/6/2017 Ex date 9/1/2017
Record Date 9/7/2017 Ex date 9/6/2017 12
As described above, the ex-dividend
date for ‘‘large’’ distributions under Rule
11140(b) is the first business day
following the payable date. This
provision was not amended in
connection with the adoption of the T+2
settlement cycle. In order to ensure that
no securities will be ex-dividend on
September 5, 2017 for purposes of
‘‘large’’ distributions, Nasdaq similarly
proposes to interpret Rule 11140(b) so
that, if an issuer sets September 1, 2017
as the payment date for a large
distribution, the ex-dividend date
would be September 6, 2017, not
September 5, 2017.
Nasdaq notes that it previously issued
an Issuer Alert addressing the
application of the T+2 implementation
date on Rule 11140(b).13
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,14 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,15
9 The payable date is the date on which a declared
stock dividend is scheduled to be paid.
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80295
(March 22, 2017), 82 FR 15564 (March 29, 2017)
(File No. S7–22–16).
11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79687
(December 23, 2016), 81 FR 96545 (December 30,
2016).
12 September 4, 2017 is Labor Day and not a
business day.
13 See Nasdaq Issuer Alert 2017–001 (Changes to
Ex-dividend Procedures Effective September 5,
2017 to Accommodate T+2 Settlement), available at
https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/nasdaq/pdf/
nasdaq-issalerts/2017/2017–001.pdf.
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
40606
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest. In the
interest of minimizing potential
confusion about proper settlement in
connection with the implementation of
the T+2 settlement cycle on September
5, 2017, the SROs have agreed that no
securities will be ex-dividend on
September 5, 2017. This proposal is
consistent with the Act because it
interprets the application of Rule
11140(b) on September 5, 2017 so that
neither ‘‘normal’’ nor ‘‘large’’
distributions will be ex-divided on that
date, thereby interpreting the
application of the Rule on that date
while minimizing the possibility of
additional operational complexity and
potential confusion about settlement
that could occur if the rule were
interpreted differently.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. As noted
above, the SROs, including DTC, have
collectively agreed that no securities
will be ex-dividend on September 5,
2017 in order to minimize confusion
about proper settlement. Accordingly,
the proposed rule change interprets the
application of Rule 11140(b) on
September 5, 2017 so that neither
‘‘normal’’ nor ‘‘large’’ distributions will
be ex-divided on that date.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Aug 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
of the Act 16 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.17
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 18 normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. However, pursuant to
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),19 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
upon filing. The Exchange has stated
that the purpose of the proposed rule
change is to minimize confusion about
proper settlement that may arise during
the transition to the T+2 settlement
cycle on September 5, 2017. The
Commission believes that waiving the
30-day operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest to avoid the confusion
that could arise in connection with the
transition to the T+2 settlement cycle on
September 5, 2017, if normal or large
distributions were to be ex-dividend on
that date. Accordingly, the Commission
hereby waives the 30-day operative
delay requirement and designates the
proposed rule change as operative upon
filing.20
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
16 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the
Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent
to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
18 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
19 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
20 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
17 17
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2017–084 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2017–084. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2017–084, and should be
submitted on or before September 15,
2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–17999 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
21 17
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
25AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40604-40606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17999]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-81446; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2017-084]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Address the Application of Rule 11140 in Connection With the
Implementation of the Shortened Settlement Cycle (T+2) on September 5,
2017
August 21, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 18, 2017, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to address the application of Rule 11140 as
it relates to
[[Page 40605]]
the ex-dividend date in connection with the implementation of the T+2
settlement cycle on September 5, 2017.
No change to the text of Rule 11140 is required by this proposal.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to address the application of Rule 11140
(Transactions in Securities ``Ex-Dividend,'' ``Ex-Rights'' or ``Ex-
Warrants'') as it relates to the ex-dividend date in connection with
the implementation of the trade date plus two business days (T+2)
settlement cycle on September 5, 2017.
On September 28, 2016, following a recommendation by the securities
industry, the Commission proposed amending Exchange Act Rule 15c6-1(a)
\3\ to shorten the standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer
transactions from trade date plus three business days (T+3) to T+2.\4\
The rationale for this proposal was that the shorter settlement cycle
would reduce the risks that arise from the value and number of
unsettled securities transactions prior to the completion of
settlement, including credit, market, and liquidity risk directly faced
by U.S. market participants.\5\ The SEC adopted the proposed changes to
Rule 15c6-1(a) on March 22, 2017.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 17 CFR 240.15c6-1(a).
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78962 (September 28,
2016), 81 FR 69240 (October 5, 2016) (Amendment to Securities
Transaction Settlement Cycle) (File No. S7-22-16).
\5\ Id.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80295 (March 22,
2017), 82 FR 15564 (March 29, 2017) (File No. S7-22-16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In connection with the amendments to Rule 15c6-1(a) and the
adoption of the shortened settlement cycle, Nasdaq submitted a proposed
rule change implementing the new settlement cycle and making
corresponding changes to its applicable rules, including Rule
11140(b).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79687 (December 23,
2016), 81 FR 96545 (December 30, 2016) (Order approving SR-NASDAQ-
2016-183).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The industry and self-regulatory organizations (``SROs''),
including The Depository Trust Company (``DTC''), which processes
corporate action events, have raised concern that the September 5, 2017
industry-wide transition date from T+3 to T+2 will result in September
7, 2017 being a ``double'' settlement date for trades that occur on
September 1, 2017 (under T+3 and reflecting the Labor Day holiday on
September 4, 2017) and trades that occur on September 5, 2017 (under
T+2), which generally will result in investors who trade on either date
being deemed a record holder of September 7, 2017. In order to avoid
confusion about the proper settlement date and to coordinate with other
SROs, Nasdaq and the other SROs have agreed that no securities will be
ex-dividend on September 5, 2017.
The Exchange is therefore now proposing to address the application
of Rule 11140(b) as it relates to the ex-dividend date in connection
with the implementation of the T+2 settlement cycle on September 5,
2017.
The ex-dividend date is the date on which a security is first
traded without the right to receive a distribution of cash, stock or
warrants. Rule 11140(b)(1) establishes the ``ex-dividend date'' for
``normal'' distributions of cash, stock or warrants. The rule provides
that, in respect to cash dividends or distributions, or stock
dividends, and the issuance or distribution of warrants, which are less
than 25% of the value of the subject security, if the definitive
information is received sufficiently in advance of the record date,\8\
the date designated as the ``ex-dividend date'' shall be the second
business day preceding the record date if the record date falls on a
business day, or the third business day preceding the record date if
the record date falls on a day designated by Nasdaq Regulation as a
non-delivery date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The record date is ``the date fixed by the trustee,
registrar, paying agent or issuer for the purpose of determining the
holders of equity securities, bonds, similar evidences of
indebtedness or unit investment trust securities entitled to receive
dividends, interest or principal payments or any other
distributions.'' See Rule 11120(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 11140(b)(2) establishes the ex-dividend date with respect to
``large'' distributions, e.g., cash dividends or distributions, stock
dividends and/or splits, and the distribution of warrants, which are
25% or greater of the value of the subject security. In this case, the
ex-dividend date is the first business day following the payable
date.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The payable date is the date on which a declared stock
dividend is scheduled to be paid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with the compliance date of the amendments to Rule 15c6-
1(a), the securities industry has adopted Tuesday, September 5, 2017 as
the implementation date of the T+2 settlement cycle.\10\ With the
implementation of the T+2 settlement cycle, the ex-dividend date for
``normal'' distributions pursuant to Rule 11140(b)(1) will be the first
business day before the record date.\11\ Accordingly, Nasdaq proposes
to interpret Rule 11140(b)(1) so that the first record date to which
this new ex-dividend date rationale will be applied will be Thursday,
September 7, 2017. During the implementation of the T+2 settlement
cycle, the ``regular'' ex-dividend dates will be as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80295 (March 22,
2017), 82 FR 15564 (March 29, 2017) (File No. S7-22-16).
\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79687 (December 23,
2016), 81 FR 96545 (December 30, 2016).
Record Date 9/1/2017 Ex date 8/30/2017
Record Date 9/5/2017 Ex date 8/31/2017
Record Date 9/6/2017 Ex date 9/1/2017
Record Date 9/7/2017 Ex date 9/6/2017 \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ September 4, 2017 is Labor Day and not a business day.
As described above, the ex-dividend date for ``large''
distributions under Rule 11140(b) is the first business day following
the payable date. This provision was not amended in connection with the
adoption of the T+2 settlement cycle. In order to ensure that no
securities will be ex-dividend on September 5, 2017 for purposes of
``large'' distributions, Nasdaq similarly proposes to interpret Rule
11140(b) so that, if an issuer sets September 1, 2017 as the payment
date for a large distribution, the ex-dividend date would be September
6, 2017, not September 5, 2017.
Nasdaq notes that it previously issued an Issuer Alert addressing
the application of the T+2 implementation date on Rule 11140(b).\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Nasdaq Issuer Alert 2017-001 (Changes to Ex-dividend
Procedures Effective September 5, 2017 to Accommodate T+2
Settlement), available at https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/nasdaq/pdf/nasdaq-issalerts/2017/2017-001.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\14\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\15\
[[Page 40606]]
in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general
to protect investors and the public interest. In the interest of
minimizing potential confusion about proper settlement in connection
with the implementation of the T+2 settlement cycle on September 5,
2017, the SROs have agreed that no securities will be ex-dividend on
September 5, 2017. This proposal is consistent with the Act because it
interprets the application of Rule 11140(b) on September 5, 2017 so
that neither ``normal'' nor ``large'' distributions will be ex-divided
on that date, thereby interpreting the application of the Rule on that
date while minimizing the possibility of additional operational
complexity and potential confusion about settlement that could occur if
the rule were interpreted differently.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As noted above, the SROs,
including DTC, have collectively agreed that no securities will be ex-
dividend on September 5, 2017 in order to minimize confusion about
proper settlement. Accordingly, the proposed rule change interprets the
application of Rule 11140(b) on September 5, 2017 so that neither
``normal'' nor ``large'' distributions will be ex-divided on that date.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \18\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\19\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative upon filing. The Exchange has stated that the
purpose of the proposed rule change is to minimize confusion about
proper settlement that may arise during the transition to the T+2
settlement cycle on September 5, 2017. The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest to avoid the confusion that could
arise in connection with the transition to the T+2 settlement cycle on
September 5, 2017, if normal or large distributions were to be ex-
dividend on that date. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the
30-day operative delay requirement and designates the proposed rule
change as operative upon filing.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\20\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-084 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-084. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2017-084, and should
be submitted on or before September 15, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17999 Filed 8-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P