Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Add Certain Rules Adopted in Connection With the Exchange's Transition to a Fully-Automated Cash Equities Market to the List of Minor Rule Violations in Rule 9217 of the Office Rules, 40051-40055 [2017-17807]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2017 / Notices
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day from the
publication of notice of filing of this
proposed rule change is August 17,
2017.
The Commission is extending the 45day time period for Commission action
on the proposed rule change. ICC’s
proposes to revise the ICC Rulebook to
provide for the clearance of Standard
Asia Corporate Single Name CDS
contracts, Standard Asia Financial
Corporate Single Name CDS contracts,
and Standard Emerging Market
Corporate Single Name CDS contracts.
The Commission finds it is appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to take action on the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider ICC’s proposed rule change.
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) 5 of the Act,
designates October 1, 2017, as the date
by which the Commission should either
approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change
(File No. SR–ICC–2017–009).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–17805 Filed 8–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–81415; File No. SR–CHX–
2017–04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Designation of Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or
Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change
To Adopt the CHX Liquidity Enhancing
Access Delay
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
August 17, 2017.
On February 10, 2017, the Chicago
Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘CHX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
5 15
6 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Aug 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to adopt the CHX Liquidity
Enhancing Access Delay (‘‘LEAD’’). The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
February 21, 2017.3 On April 3, 2017,
the Commission designated a longer
period within which to approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved.4 The Commission received
eleven comment letters on the proposed
rule change, including a response from
the Exchange.5 On May 22, 2017, the
Commission instituted proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the
Exchange Act 6 to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change.7 Since then, the
Commission has received six more
comment letters, including a response
from the Exchange.8
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 9 provides
that, after initiating proceedings, the
Commission shall issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change not later than 180 days after
the date of publication of notice of filing
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80041
(February 14, 2017), 82 FR 11252 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80364,
82 FR 17065 (April 7, 2017).
5 See letters from: (1) Ryan Hitch, Head of
Equities Trading, XR Securities LLC, dated
February 24, 2017; (2) Douglas A. Cifu, Chief
Executive Officer, Virtu Financial LLC, dated
February 27, 2017; (3) Joanna Mallers, Secretary,
FIA Principal Traders Group, dated March 13, 2017;
(4) Adam Nunes, Head of Business Development,
Hudson River Trading LLC, dated March 13, 2017;
(5) R.T. Leuchtkafer, dated March 14, 2017; (6)
Stephen John Berger, Managing Director,
Government & Regulatory Policy, Citadel Securities,
dated March 14, 2017; (7) Tyler Gellasch, Executive
Director, Healthy Markets Association, March 17,
2017; (8) Elizabeth K. King, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary, New York Stock Exchange,
dated March 20, 2017; (9) James G. Ongena,
Executive Vice President and General Counsel,
CHX, dated March 24, 2017; (10) Steve Crutchfield,
Head of Market Structure, CTC Trading Group, LLC,
dated April 4, 2017; and (11) Theodore R. Lazo,
Managing Director and Associate General Counsel,
Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association, dated May 17, 2017. All comments on
the proposed rule change are available at: https://
www.sec.gov/comments/sr-chx-2017-04/
chx201704.htm.
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80740,
82 FR 24412 (May 26, 2017).
8 See letters from: (1) R. T. Leuchtkafer, dated
June 15, 2017; (2) Stephen Berger, Managing
Director, Government and Regulatory Policy,
Citadel Securities, dated June 16, 2017; (3) Joanna
Mallers, Secretary, FIA Principal Traders Group,
dated June 16, 2017; (4) James G. Ongena, Executive
Vice President, General Counsel, CHX, dated June
30, 2017; (5) R. T. Leuchtkafer, dated July 7, 2017;
and (6) R. T. Leuchtkafer, dated July 10, 2017.
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40051
of the proposed rule change. The
Commission may, however, extend the
period for issuing an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change
by not more than 60 days if the
Commission determines that a longer
period is appropriate and publishes the
reasons for such determination. The
proposed rule change was published for
notice and comment in the Federal
Register on February 21, 2017.10 August
20, 2017 is 180 days from that date, and
October 19, 2017 is 240 days from that
date.
The Commission finds it appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change
so that it has sufficient time to consider
the proposed rule change, the issues
raised in the comment letters that have
been submitted in connection therewith,
and the Exchange’s responses to the
comments. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,11 designates October
19, 2017 as the date by which the
Commission should either approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change
(File No. SR–CHX–2017–04).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–17806 Filed 8–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–81418; File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2017–06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Add Certain Rules
Adopted in Connection With the
Exchange’s Transition to a FullyAutomated Cash Equities Market to the
List of Minor Rule Violations in Rule
9217 of the Office Rules
August 17, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on August 9,
2017, NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE
American’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
10 See
supra text accompanying note 3.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
11 15
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
40052
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2017 / Notices
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to add certain
rules adopted in connection with the
Exchange’s transition to a fullyautomated cash equities market to the
list of minor rule violations in Rule
9217 of the Office Rules. The proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
On January 29, 2015, the Exchange
announced the implementation of Pillar,
which is an integrated trading
technology platform designed to use a
single specification for connecting to the
equities and options markets operated
by the Exchange and its affiliates, NYSE
Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’) and New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’).4 NYSE
Arca Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca
Equities),5 which operates the cash
equities trading platform for NYSE Arca,
was the first trading system to migrate
to Pillar.6
4 See Trader Update dated January 29, 2015,
available here: https://www.nyse.com/traderupdate/history#13517.
5 NYSE Arca Equities is a wholly-owned
corporation of NYSE Arca and operates as a facility
of NYSE Arca.
6 NYSE Arca filed four rule proposals in
connection with the NYSE Arca implementation of
Pillar. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Aug 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
To effect its transition to Pillar, the
Exchange adopted the rule numbering
framework of the NYSE Arca Equities,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’) rules for
Exchange cash equities trading on the
Pillar trading platform.7 As described in
the Framework Filing, the Exchange
denoted the rules applicable to cash
equities trading on Pillar with the letter
‘‘E’’ to distinguish such rules from the
then current Exchange rules with the
same numbering. The Exchange’s
trading rules for cash equity trading on
Pillar are also based on the trading rules
of NYSE Arca Equities.8 The Exchange
began trading on the Pillar platform on
July 24, 2017.9
74951 (May 13, 2015), 80 FR 28721 (May 19, 2015)
(Notice) and 75494 (July 20, 2015), 80 FR 44170
(July 24, 2015) (SR–NYSEArca–2015–38) (Approval
Order of NYSE Arca Pillar I Filing, adopting rules
for Trading Sessions, Order Ranking and Display,
and Order Execution); Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 75497 (July 21, 2015), 80 FR 45022
(July 28, 2015) (Notice) and 76267 (October 26,
2015), 80 FR 66951 (October 30, 2015) (SR–
NYSEArca–2015–56) (Approval Order of NYSE
Arca Pillar II Filing, adopting rules for Orders and
Modifiers and the Retail Liquidity Program);
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 75467 (July
16, 2015), 80 FR 43515 (July 22, 2015) (Notice) and
76198 (October 20, 2015), 80 FR 65274 (October 26,
2015) (SR–NYSEArca–2015–58) (Approval Order of
NYSE Arca Pillar III Filing, adopting rules for
Trading Halts, Short Sales, Limit Up-Limit Down,
and Odd Lots and Mixed Lots); and Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 76085 (October 6, 2015),
80 FR 61513 (October 13, 2015) (Notice) and 76869
(January 11, 2016), 81 FR 2276 (January 15, 2016)
(SR–NYSEArca–2015–86) (Approval Order of NYSE
Arca Pillar IV Filing, adopting rules for Auctions).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79242
(November 4, 2016), 81 FR 79081 (November 10,
2016) (SR–NYSEMKT–2016–97) (Notice and Filing
of Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change) (the ‘‘Framework Filing’’). In addition, the
Exchange filed a proposed rule change to support
Exchange trading of securities listed on other
national securities exchanges on an unlisted trading
privileges basis, including Exchange Traded
Products (‘‘ETP’’) listed on other exchanges. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79400
(November 25, 2016), 81 FR 86750 (December 1,
2016) (SR–NYSEMKT–2016–103) (Notice) (the
‘‘ETP Listing Rules Filing’’).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80590
(May 4, 2017), 82 FR 21843 (May 10, 2017)
(Approval Order) and 79993 (February 9, 2017), 82
FR 10814 (February 15, 2017) (SR–NYSEMKT–
2017–01) (Notice) (‘‘Trading Rules Filing’’). The
Exchange also has established market maker
obligations when trading on the Pillar trading
platform. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
80577 (May 2, 2017), 82 FR 21446 (May 8, 2017)
(SR–NYSEMKT–2017–04) (Approval Order). In
addition, the Exchange introduced a delay
mechanism on Pillar that adds the equivalent of 350
microseconds of latency to inbound and outbound
order messages, as described in greater detail in
Rules 1.1E(y) and 7.29E(b). See Securities Exchange
Act Release Nos. 80700 (May 16, 2017), 82 FR
23381 (May 22, 2017) (SR–NYSEMKT–2017–05)
(Approval Order) and 79998 (February 9, 2017), 82
FR 10828 (February 15, 2017) (SR–NYSEMKT–
2017–05) (Notice).
9 With Pillar, the Exchange transitioned its cash
equities trading platform from a Floor-based market
with a parity allocation model to a fully automated
price-time priority allocation model that trades all
NMS Stocks. See Trading Rules Filing, supra note
9, 82 FR at 21843.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Newly Exchange adopted rules that
are based on NYSE Arca Equities Rules
include the following:
• Rule 2.21E (Employees of ETP
Holders Registration)
• Rule 2.24E (ETP Books and Records)
• Rule 6.3E (Prevention of the Misuse of
Material, Nonpublic Information) and
its Commentaries
• Rule 6.15E (Prearranged Trades)
• Rule 7.16E (Short Sales)
• Rule 7.20E (Registration of Market
Makers)
• Rule 7.23E (Obligations of Market
Makers)
• Rule 7.30E (Authorized Traders)
NYSE Arca Equities includes its
versions of the above-listed rules as
eligible for disposition under its Minor
Rule Plan.10 The Exchange proposes to
similarly add these rules to the list of
rules in Rule 9217 (Violations
Appropriate for Disposition Under Rule
9216(b)) that are eligible for summary
fines under Rule 9216(b). The Exchange
also proposes to add accompanying fine
levels based on the fine levels currently
in place on NYSE Arca Equities Rule
10.12 (Minor Rule Plan) for each Rule.
Proposed Rule Change
Rule 9217, the Exchange’s Minor Rule
Violation Plan (‘‘MRVP’’), sets forth the
list of rules under which a member
organization or covered person may be
subject to a fine under a minor rule
violation plan as described in proposed
Rule 9216(b).
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 9217 to add recently adopted Rules
2.21E, 2.24E, 6.3E, 6.15E, 7.16E, 7.20E,
7.23E, and 7.30E to the list of rules
eligible for disposition pursuant to the
Exchange’s MRVP. These proposed
changes are based on NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 10.12(g) and (h), which
specifies, in part, that NYSE Arca
Equities Rules 2.21, 2.24, 6.3, 6.15(b),11
7.16, 7.20, 7.23, and 7.30 are eligible for
disposition pursuant to NYSE Arca’s
Minor Rule Plan.12 The Exchange also
10 See
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12(g) & (h).
American Rule 6.15E adopted
subdivision (b) of NYSE Arca Equities Rule 6.15(b),
which prohibits participation in a prearranged
trade.
12 See NYSE Arca Equities Rule10.12(g)(1) (NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 7.16); (g)(2) (NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 7.23(a)(1)); (g)(4) (NYSE Arca Equities Rule
7.30); (g)(5) (NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.20(a); and
(g)(6) (NYSE Arca Equities Rule 6.15(b)). See also
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12(h)(7) (Rule 6.3E and
its Commentaries); (h)(10) (Rule 2.24); and (h)(11)
(Rule 2.21).
Failure to comply with the sponsored participant
access requirements of NYSE Arca Rule 7.29 is also
eligible for disposition pursuant to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 10.12(g)(3). NYSE American Rule
7.29E is based on NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.29(a)
without any substantive differences. However, the
Exchange did not include rule text based on NYSE
11 NYSE
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
proposes to add the accompanying fine
levels for each Rule based on the fine
levels in NYSE Arca Equities Rule
10.12.13
To effect these changes, the Exchange
proposes to add a paragraph (a) titled
‘‘Trading Rule Violations’’ under the
current heading in Rule 9217 titled ‘‘List
of Equities Rule Violations and Fines
Applicable Thereto,’’ [sic] Under
proposed paragraph (a), the Exchange
proposes to set forth the following text
describing the eligible trading rule
violations:
• Short Sale Rules (Rule 7.16E).
• Failure to maintain continuous,
two-sided Q Orders in those securities
in which the Market Maker is registered
to trade (Rule 7.23E(a)(1)).
• Failure to comply with Authorized
Trader requirements. (Rule 7.30E).
• Acting as a Market Maker in a
security without being registered as
such as required by Rule 7.20E(a).
• Committing any act prohibited by
Rule 6.15E.
The Exchange further proposes
paragraph (b) titled ‘‘Record Keeping
and Other Minor Rule Violations’’ to
Rule 9217, which would specify the
following text describing the eligible
rule violations:
• Failure to comply with the
requirements for preventing the misuse
of material nonpublic information as set
forth in Rule 6.3E and its Commentaries.
• Failure to comply with the books
and records requirements of Rule 2.24E.
• Failure to comply with the
employee registration or other
requirements of Rule 2.21E.
The Exchange further proposes a new
paragraph (c) titled ‘‘Legacy Minor
Rules’’ 14 that would appear above the
Arca Equities Rule 7.29(b) because NYSE American
does not offer sponsored access in Pillar. See
Trading Rules Filing, supra note 9, 82 FR at 10820.
Accordingly, because NYSE Arca Equities Rule
10.12(g)(3) is limited to failure to comply with
sponsored participant access requirements, the
Exchange determined not to include a reference to
NYSE American Rule 7.29E in the proposed
amendment to Rule 9217.
13 The Exchange does not propose to incorporate
the text of subsections (a)–(f) or footnote 1 of NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 10.12 into Rule 9217.
Subsections (a)–(f) of NYSE Arca Equities Rule
10.12 are duplicative of existing requirements in
Rule 9217 and Rule 9216(b), which describe the
procedure for imposition of minor rule violations.
Similarly, footnote 1 of NYSE Arca Equities Rule
10.12 applies to certain NYSE Arca Equities rules
for which there are no Exchange equivalents. See
also note 17, infra.
14 Since the transition to Pillar, specified
Exchange equities trading rules are no longer
applicable, and Exchange rules governing equities
trading that are not identified as inapplicable
continue to govern Exchange operations on its cash
equities trading platform. See Trading Rules Filing,
supra note 9, 82 FR at 10815–16. For purposes of
Rule 9217, the Exchange proposes to refer to the
non-Pillar Exchange rules regarding equities trading
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Aug 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
current list of eligible rules in Rule
9217, above ‘‘Rule 15—Equities (PreOpening Indications).’’
Finally, in Rule 9217, the Exchange
proposes to add proposed paragraph (d)
titled ‘‘Fine Schedule’’ at the end of the
current list of eligible rules, following
‘‘Rule 518—Equities requirements for
clearance and settlement of transactions
in Nasdaq Securities.’’ Below proposed
paragraph (d), the Exchange would
include the following text drawn from
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12:
The following fine schedule sets forth the
amount of the fine(s) to be imposed. Except
as noted below, the amount of the fine(s)
shall be imposed at the First Level pursuant
to the chart below. If another Minor Rule
Plan Fine has been issued to the same
member organization or covered person 15 for
the same or similar conduct violating the
same rule (regardless of when paid) within
24 months from the date of occurrence of the
violation(s) set forth in the current Notice of
Minor Rule Plan Fine, then the fine(s) shall
be imposed at the Second Level. If two or
more separate Notices of Minor Rule Plan
Fine have previously been issued to the same
member organization or covered person for
the same or similar conduct violating the
same rule within 24 months from the date of
occurrence of the violation(s) set forth in the
current Notice of Minor Rule Plan Fine, then
the fine(s) shall be imposed at the Third
Level.
These fines are intended to apply to minor
violations. For more serious violations, other
disciplinary action may be sought.
Below this text, the Exchange would
insert new three new subsections (1)–
(3). Subsection (d)(1) would be titled
‘‘Trading Rule Violations Fine Levels’’
and would include a chart of first,
second and third level fines based on
the NYSE Arca Equities Rules for the
equivalent Exchange Rules, as follows:
• Violations of Rule 7.16E would be
eligible for a $500 first level fine, a
$1,000 second level fine, and a $2,500
third level fine;
• Violations of Rule 7.23E(a)(1)
would be eligible for a $250 first level
fine, a $500 second level fine, and a
$1,000 third level fine;
• Violations of Rule 7.30E would be
eligible for a $1,000 first level fine, a
$2,500 second level fine, and a $3,500
third level fine; and
• Violations of Rule 7.20E(a) would
be eligible for a $250 first level fine, a
$500 second level fine, and a $1,000
third level fine.
as ‘‘Legacy Minor Rules.’’ The Exchange anticipates
filing separate proposed rule changes to delete the
rules identified as not being applicable to trading
on Pillar and to update the list of Legacy Minor
Rules. See, e.g., id. at 10816.
15 The Exchange substituted ‘‘member
organization or covered person’’ to reflect the
Exchange’s membership. The rest of the proposed
text is the same as that in NYSE Arca Equities Rule
10.12.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40053
• Violations of Rule 6.15E would be
eligible for a $1,000 first level fine, a
$2,500 second level fine, and a $3,500
third level fine.
New subsection (d)(2) would be titled
‘‘Record Keeping and Other Minor Rule
Violations Fine Levels,’’ and would
include a chart of the first, second and
third level fines that are based on the
NYSE Arca Equities Rules for the
equivalent Exchange Rule, as follows:
• Violations of Rule 6.3E and its
Commentaries would be eligible for a
$2,000 first level fine, a $4,000 second
level fine, and a $5,000 third level fine.
• Violations of Rule 2.24E would be
eligible for a $2,000 first level fine, a
$4,000 second level fine, and a $5,000
third level fine.
• Violations of Rule 2.21E would be
eligible for a $1,000 first level fine, a
$2,500 second level fine, and a $3,500
third level fine.16
These fine levels are the same as those
in the NYSE Arca Equities fine schedule
contained in NYSE Arca Equities Rule
10.12(i) for each analogous rule.17
New subsection (e) would be titled
‘‘Legacy Minor Rules Fine Schedule’’ 18
and would summarize fine amounts for
individuals and member organizations
based on first, second and subsequent
offenses. These amounts would
continue to govern violations of legacy
minor rules following implementation
[sic] of Pillar.
Lastly, the Exchange proposes to
delete two erroneous references to
‘‘NYSE Arca’’ rules in Rule 476A
(Imposition of Fines for Minor
Violation(s) of Rules) 19 and in the list
of options rule violations and applicable
fines in Rule 9217(ii)(7)(b) and replace
them with ‘‘Exchange.’’ The Exchange
also proposes to correct a typographical
error in Rule 476A(ii)(7)(c) and in Rule
16 The Exchange proposes to add a footnote 1
based on footnote 2 in NYSE Arca Equities Rule
10.12 providing that, in addition to the specified
fines, the Exchange may require a violator to remit
all fees that it should have paid to the Exchange
pursuant to Rule 2.21E.
17 See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12(i)(1)
(setting forth fine levels for NYSE Arca Equities
Rules 7.16, 7.23(a)(1), 7.30, 7.20(a) and 6.15(b));
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12(i)(2) (setting forth
fine levels for NYSE Arca Equities Rules 6.3E and
its Commentaries, 2.24, and 2.21). Rule 9217
retained the Exchange’s maximum fine for minor
rule violations which, under legacy Rule 476A, was
$5,000. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
77241 (February 26, 2016), 81 FR 11311 (March 3,
2016) (SR–NYSEMKT–2016–30). See also Rule
19d–1 under the Act. 17 CFR 240.19d–1.
18 See note 15, supra.
19 Rule 476A is the Exchange’s legacy minor rule
plan and continues to apply to matters initiated
prior to April 15, 2016, the effective date of the
Exchange’s new disciplinary rules, which include
Rule 9217.
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
40054
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
9217(ii)(7)(c) by replacing ‘‘procures’’
with ‘‘procedures.’’
Summary fines provide a meaningful
sanction for minor or technical
violations of rules. The Exchange
believes that adding recently adopted
Pillar Rules modeled on the trading
rules of is affiliate NYSE Arca Equities
to the list of rules eligible for
disposition pursuant to the Exchange’s
MRVP and subject to the same fine
levels as NYSE Arca Equities would
harmonize requirements across
exchanges for the same conduct.
Accordingly, for all the foregoing
reasons, the Exchange believes that
inclusion of Rules 2.21E, 2.24E, 6.3E,
6.15E, 7.16E, 7.20E, 7.23E, and 7.30E
and the accompanying fine levels based
on NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12 in
Rule 9217 would be appropriate.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,20 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),21 in
particular, because it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The proposed rule change is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices because it will
provide the Exchange the ability to issue
a minor rule fine for violations of its
rules governing cash equities trading
and market maker and electronic DMM
functions and obligations on the Pillar
platform. In addition, adding rules
based on the rules of its affiliate to the
Exchange’s minor rule plan and the
associated fine levels would promote
fairness and consistency in the
marketplace by harmonizing minor rule
plan fines across affiliated exchanges for
the same conduct. Similarly, the
proposed rule change would remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market by
further supporting the Exchange’s
transition to a fully automated cash
equities trading model on the Pillar
trading platform and, by including rules
based on the rules of its affiliated
market, NYSE Arca Equities, into the
Exchange’s MRVP with the same fine
levels, further Pillar’s goal of promoting
consistency among the Exchange, NYSE
Arca, and the NYSE.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposed amendments to Rule 9217 are
consistent with Section 6(b)(6) of the
Act,22 which provides that members and
persons associated with members shall
be appropriately disciplined for
violation of the provisions of the rules
of the exchange, by expulsion,
suspension, limitation of activities,
functions, and operations, fine, censure,
being suspended or barred from being
associated with a member, or any other
fitting sanction. As noted, the proposed
rule change would provide the
Exchange ability to sanction minor or
technical violations of the recently
adopted Pillar Rules pursuant to the
Exchange’s MRVP. Moreover, as noted
above, the fine levels associated with
the rule violations incorporated into
Rule 9217 would be based on the rules
of its affiliated market, NYSE Arca
Equities. Moreover, the Exchange
believes that delineating in Rule 9217
the rules and fine levels relating to
trading on the Pillar trading platform
from legacy rules relating to Floor-based
trading promotes transparency
following the Exchange’s transition to
Pillar.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed change is not designed to
address any competitive issue but rather
to update the Exchange’s MRVP to
reflect newly adopted rules. The
proposed rule change would also
support the launch of the Exchange’s
new fully automated cash equities
trading platform that trades all NMS
Stocks and is based on the rules of
NYSE Arca Equities.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 23 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.24 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 25 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),26 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 27 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEAMER–2017–06 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2017–06. This
24 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
26 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
27 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
25 17
20 15
21 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Aug 22, 2017
22 15
23 15
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b)(6).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2017 / Notices
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEAMER–2017–06, and should be
submitted on or before September 13,
2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.28
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–17807 Filed 8–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–81420; File No. SR–NYSE–
2017–41]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Change in Connection With
the Name Change of Its Affiliate, From
NYSE MKT LLC to NYSE American LLC
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
August 17, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on August
9, 2017, New York Stock Exchange LLC
28 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Aug 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II, below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes in connection
with the name change of its affiliate,
from NYSE MKT LLC to NYSE
American LLC, to amend certain rules,
the Independence Policy of the Board of
Directors (‘‘Independence Policy’’), the
New York Stock Exchange Price List
(‘‘Price List’’), and the NYSE Proprietary
Market Data Fees (‘‘Market Data Fees’’)
to reflect that name change. The
proposed change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes, in
connection with the name change of its
affiliate, from NYSE MKT LLC (‘‘NYSE
MKT’’) to NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE
American’’), to amend certain rules of
the Exchange, the Independence Policy,
Price List, and Market Data Fees to
reflect that name change.4
4 The Exchange originally filed the proposed
changes on July 21, 2017 (SR–NYSE–2017–37),
withdrew such filing on July 27 and refiled the
same day (SR–NYSE–2017–39). The Exchange
subsequently withdrew SR–NYSE–2017–39 and
refiled on August 2, 2017 (SR–NYSE–2017–40). SR–
NYSE–2017–40 was subsequently withdrawn and
replaced by this filing.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40055
Background
On March 16, 2017, NYSE MKT filed
rule changes with the Commission in
connection with its name change to
NYSE American.5 In addition, on May
19, 2017, NYSE MKT filed rule changes
with the Commission associated with
the rebranding of NYSE Amex Options,
the Exchange’s facility for trading
options, to NYSE American Options.6
The NYSE MKT name change to NYSE
American became operative on July 24,
2017. Accordingly, the Exchange
proposes to amend the Independence
Policy, Price List, Market Data Fees, and
certain rules to [sic] as detailed below
to reflect the new name of its affiliate,
NYSE American.
Proposed Rule Changes
• The Exchange proposes to replace
‘‘NYSE MKT LLC’’ with ‘‘NYSE
American LLC’’ in Rule 2,
Supplementary Material .10 (‘‘Member’’,
‘‘Membership’’, ‘‘Member Firm’’, etc.);
Rule 17(c)(2) (Use of Exchange Facilities
and Vendor Services); Rule 18,
Supplementary Material .10(a)
(Compensation in Relation to Exchange
System Failure); Rule 70,
Supplementary Material .40(3)
(Execution of Floor Broker Interest);
Rule 98 (c)(6) (Operation of a DMM
Unit); Rule 103, Supplementary
Material .20(b)(6) (Registration and
Capital Requirements of DMMs and
DMM Units); and Rule 103B(IX)
(Security Allocation and Reallocation).
• The Exchange proposes to replace
‘‘NYSE MKT’’ with ‘‘NYSE American’’
in Rule 2, Supplementary Material .10
and .20; Rule 17(c)(2); Rule 18,
Supplementary Material .10; Rule 36,
Supplementary Material .70(a)(iii)
(Communications Between Exchange
and Members’ Officers); Rule 70,
Supplementary Material .40(3); Rule
103, Supplementary Material .20(b)(6);
and Rule 103B(IX).
• The Exchange proposes to replace
‘‘NYSE Amex Options Trading Floor’’
with ‘‘NYSE American Options Trading
Floor’’ in Rule 6A(b)(‘‘Trading Floor’’)
and Rule 36, Supplementary Material
.23 and .70(a).
• The Exchange proposes to replace
‘‘NYSE Amex’’ with ‘‘NYSE American’’
in Rule 36, Supplementary Material .23
and .70(a).
• The Exchange proposes to replace
‘‘NYSE Amex-listed’’ with ‘‘NYSE
American-listed’’ in Rule 6A.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.80283
(March 21, 2017), 82 FR 15244 (March 27, 2017)
(SR–NYSEMKT–2017–14).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80748
(May 23, 2017), 82 FR 24764 (May 30, 2017) (SR–
NYSEMKT 2017–20).
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40051-40055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17807]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-81418; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2017-06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Add
Certain Rules Adopted in Connection With the Exchange's Transition to a
Fully-Automated Cash Equities Market to the List of Minor Rule
Violations in Rule 9217 of the Office Rules
August 17, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that on August 9, 2017, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
[[Page 40052]]
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to add certain rules adopted in connection
with the Exchange's transition to a fully-automated cash equities
market to the list of minor rule violations in Rule 9217 of the Office
Rules. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site
at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
On January 29, 2015, the Exchange announced the implementation of
Pillar, which is an integrated trading technology platform designed to
use a single specification for connecting to the equities and options
markets operated by the Exchange and its affiliates, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(``NYSE Arca'') and New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'').\4\ NYSE
Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE Arca Equities),\5\ which operates the cash
equities trading platform for NYSE Arca, was the first trading system
to migrate to Pillar.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Trader Update dated January 29, 2015, available here:
https://www.nyse.com/trader-update/history#13517.
\5\ NYSE Arca Equities is a wholly-owned corporation of NYSE
Arca and operates as a facility of NYSE Arca.
\6\ NYSE Arca filed four rule proposals in connection with the
NYSE Arca implementation of Pillar. See Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 74951 (May 13, 2015), 80 FR 28721 (May 19, 2015)
(Notice) and 75494 (July 20, 2015), 80 FR 44170 (July 24, 2015) (SR-
NYSEArca-2015-38) (Approval Order of NYSE Arca Pillar I Filing,
adopting rules for Trading Sessions, Order Ranking and Display, and
Order Execution); Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 75497 (July
21, 2015), 80 FR 45022 (July 28, 2015) (Notice) and 76267 (October
26, 2015), 80 FR 66951 (October 30, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2015-56)
(Approval Order of NYSE Arca Pillar II Filing, adopting rules for
Orders and Modifiers and the Retail Liquidity Program); Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 75467 (July 16, 2015), 80 FR 43515 (July
22, 2015) (Notice) and 76198 (October 20, 2015), 80 FR 65274
(October 26, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2015-58) (Approval Order of NYSE
Arca Pillar III Filing, adopting rules for Trading Halts, Short
Sales, Limit Up-Limit Down, and Odd Lots and Mixed Lots); and
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 76085 (October 6, 2015), 80 FR
61513 (October 13, 2015) (Notice) and 76869 (January 11, 2016), 81
FR 2276 (January 15, 2016) (SR-NYSEArca-2015-86) (Approval Order of
NYSE Arca Pillar IV Filing, adopting rules for Auctions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To effect its transition to Pillar, the Exchange adopted the rule
numbering framework of the NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE Arca
Equities'') rules for Exchange cash equities trading on the Pillar
trading platform.\7\ As described in the Framework Filing, the Exchange
denoted the rules applicable to cash equities trading on Pillar with
the letter ``E'' to distinguish such rules from the then current
Exchange rules with the same numbering. The Exchange's trading rules
for cash equity trading on Pillar are also based on the trading rules
of NYSE Arca Equities.\8\ The Exchange began trading on the Pillar
platform on July 24, 2017.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79242 (November 4,
2016), 81 FR 79081 (November 10, 2016) (SR-NYSEMKT-2016-97) (Notice
and Filing of Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change) (the
``Framework Filing''). In addition, the Exchange filed a proposed
rule change to support Exchange trading of securities listed on
other national securities exchanges on an unlisted trading
privileges basis, including Exchange Traded Products (``ETP'')
listed on other exchanges. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
79400 (November 25, 2016), 81 FR 86750 (December 1, 2016) (SR-
NYSEMKT-2016-103) (Notice) (the ``ETP Listing Rules Filing'').
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80590 (May 4,
2017), 82 FR 21843 (May 10, 2017) (Approval Order) and 79993
(February 9, 2017), 82 FR 10814 (February 15, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-
2017-01) (Notice) (``Trading Rules Filing''). The Exchange also has
established market maker obligations when trading on the Pillar
trading platform. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80577 (May
2, 2017), 82 FR 21446 (May 8, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-04) (Approval
Order). In addition, the Exchange introduced a delay mechanism on
Pillar that adds the equivalent of 350 microseconds of latency to
inbound and outbound order messages, as described in greater detail
in Rules 1.1E(y) and 7.29E(b). See Securities Exchange Act Release
Nos. 80700 (May 16, 2017), 82 FR 23381 (May 22, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-
2017-05) (Approval Order) and 79998 (February 9, 2017), 82 FR 10828
(February 15, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-05) (Notice).
\9\ With Pillar, the Exchange transitioned its cash equities
trading platform from a Floor-based market with a parity allocation
model to a fully automated price-time priority allocation model that
trades all NMS Stocks. See Trading Rules Filing, supra note 9, 82 FR
at 21843.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newly Exchange adopted rules that are based on NYSE Arca Equities
Rules include the following:
Rule 2.21E (Employees of ETP Holders Registration)
Rule 2.24E (ETP Books and Records)
Rule 6.3E (Prevention of the Misuse of Material, Nonpublic
Information) and its Commentaries
Rule 6.15E (Prearranged Trades)
Rule 7.16E (Short Sales)
Rule 7.20E (Registration of Market Makers)
Rule 7.23E (Obligations of Market Makers)
Rule 7.30E (Authorized Traders)
NYSE Arca Equities includes its versions of the above-listed rules
as eligible for disposition under its Minor Rule Plan.\10\ The Exchange
proposes to similarly add these rules to the list of rules in Rule 9217
(Violations Appropriate for Disposition Under Rule 9216(b)) that are
eligible for summary fines under Rule 9216(b). The Exchange also
proposes to add accompanying fine levels based on the fine levels
currently in place on NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12 (Minor Rule Plan)
for each Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12(g) & (h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Change
Rule 9217, the Exchange's Minor Rule Violation Plan (``MRVP''),
sets forth the list of rules under which a member organization or
covered person may be subject to a fine under a minor rule violation
plan as described in proposed Rule 9216(b).
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 9217 to add recently adopted
Rules 2.21E, 2.24E, 6.3E, 6.15E, 7.16E, 7.20E, 7.23E, and 7.30E to the
list of rules eligible for disposition pursuant to the Exchange's MRVP.
These proposed changes are based on NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12(g)
and (h), which specifies, in part, that NYSE Arca Equities Rules 2.21,
2.24, 6.3, 6.15(b),\11\ 7.16, 7.20, 7.23, and 7.30 are eligible for
disposition pursuant to NYSE Arca's Minor Rule Plan.\12\ The Exchange
also
[[Page 40053]]
proposes to add the accompanying fine levels for each Rule based on the
fine levels in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ NYSE American Rule 6.15E adopted subdivision (b) of NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 6.15(b), which prohibits participation in a
prearranged trade.
\12\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule10.12(g)(1) (NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 7.16); (g)(2) (NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.23(a)(1)); (g)(4)
(NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.30); (g)(5) (NYSE Arca Equities Rule
7.20(a); and (g)(6) (NYSE Arca Equities Rule 6.15(b)). See also NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 10.12(h)(7) (Rule 6.3E and its Commentaries);
(h)(10) (Rule 2.24); and (h)(11) (Rule 2.21).
Failure to comply with the sponsored participant access
requirements of NYSE Arca Rule 7.29 is also eligible for disposition
pursuant to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12(g)(3). NYSE American Rule
7.29E is based on NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.29(a) without any
substantive differences. However, the Exchange did not include rule
text based on NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.29(b) because NYSE American
does not offer sponsored access in Pillar. See Trading Rules Filing,
supra note 9, 82 FR at 10820. Accordingly, because NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 10.12(g)(3) is limited to failure to comply with
sponsored participant access requirements, the Exchange determined
not to include a reference to NYSE American Rule 7.29E in the
proposed amendment to Rule 9217.
\13\ The Exchange does not propose to incorporate the text of
subsections (a)-(f) or footnote 1 of NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12
into Rule 9217. Subsections (a)-(f) of NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12
are duplicative of existing requirements in Rule 9217 and Rule
9216(b), which describe the procedure for imposition of minor rule
violations. Similarly, footnote 1 of NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12
applies to certain NYSE Arca Equities rules for which there are no
Exchange equivalents. See also note 17, infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To effect these changes, the Exchange proposes to add a paragraph
(a) titled ``Trading Rule Violations'' under the current heading in
Rule 9217 titled ``List of Equities Rule Violations and Fines
Applicable Thereto,'' [sic] Under proposed paragraph (a), the Exchange
proposes to set forth the following text describing the eligible
trading rule violations:
Short Sale Rules (Rule 7.16E).
Failure to maintain continuous, two-sided Q Orders in
those securities in which the Market Maker is registered to trade (Rule
7.23E(a)(1)).
Failure to comply with Authorized Trader requirements.
(Rule 7.30E).
Acting as a Market Maker in a security without being
registered as such as required by Rule 7.20E(a).
Committing any act prohibited by Rule 6.15E.
The Exchange further proposes paragraph (b) titled ``Record Keeping
and Other Minor Rule Violations'' to Rule 9217, which would specify the
following text describing the eligible rule violations:
Failure to comply with the requirements for preventing the
misuse of material nonpublic information as set forth in Rule 6.3E and
its Commentaries.
Failure to comply with the books and records requirements
of Rule 2.24E.
Failure to comply with the employee registration or other
requirements of Rule 2.21E.
The Exchange further proposes a new paragraph (c) titled ``Legacy
Minor Rules'' \14\ that would appear above the current list of eligible
rules in Rule 9217, above ``Rule 15--Equities (Pre-Opening
Indications).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Since the transition to Pillar, specified Exchange equities
trading rules are no longer applicable, and Exchange rules governing
equities trading that are not identified as inapplicable continue to
govern Exchange operations on its cash equities trading platform.
See Trading Rules Filing, supra note 9, 82 FR at 10815-16. For
purposes of Rule 9217, the Exchange proposes to refer to the non-
Pillar Exchange rules regarding equities trading as ``Legacy Minor
Rules.'' The Exchange anticipates filing separate proposed rule
changes to delete the rules identified as not being applicable to
trading on Pillar and to update the list of Legacy Minor Rules. See,
e.g., id. at 10816.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, in Rule 9217, the Exchange proposes to add proposed
paragraph (d) titled ``Fine Schedule'' at the end of the current list
of eligible rules, following ``Rule 518--Equities requirements for
clearance and settlement of transactions in Nasdaq Securities.'' Below
proposed paragraph (d), the Exchange would include the following text
drawn from NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12:
The following fine schedule sets forth the amount of the fine(s)
to be imposed. Except as noted below, the amount of the fine(s)
shall be imposed at the First Level pursuant to the chart below. If
another Minor Rule Plan Fine has been issued to the same member
organization or covered person \15\ for the same or similar conduct
violating the same rule (regardless of when paid) within 24 months
from the date of occurrence of the violation(s) set forth in the
current Notice of Minor Rule Plan Fine, then the fine(s) shall be
imposed at the Second Level. If two or more separate Notices of
Minor Rule Plan Fine have previously been issued to the same member
organization or covered person for the same or similar conduct
violating the same rule within 24 months from the date of occurrence
of the violation(s) set forth in the current Notice of Minor Rule
Plan Fine, then the fine(s) shall be imposed at the Third Level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The Exchange substituted ``member organization or covered
person'' to reflect the Exchange's membership. The rest of the
proposed text is the same as that in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These fines are intended to apply to minor violations. For more
serious violations, other disciplinary action may be sought.
Below this text, the Exchange would insert new three new
subsections (1)-(3). Subsection (d)(1) would be titled ``Trading Rule
Violations Fine Levels'' and would include a chart of first, second and
third level fines based on the NYSE Arca Equities Rules for the
equivalent Exchange Rules, as follows:
Violations of Rule 7.16E would be eligible for a $500
first level fine, a $1,000 second level fine, and a $2,500 third level
fine;
Violations of Rule 7.23E(a)(1) would be eligible for a
$250 first level fine, a $500 second level fine, and a $1,000 third
level fine;
Violations of Rule 7.30E would be eligible for a $1,000
first level fine, a $2,500 second level fine, and a $3,500 third level
fine; and
Violations of Rule 7.20E(a) would be eligible for a $250
first level fine, a $500 second level fine, and a $1,000 third level
fine.
Violations of Rule 6.15E would be eligible for a $1,000
first level fine, a $2,500 second level fine, and a $3,500 third level
fine.
New subsection (d)(2) would be titled ``Record Keeping and Other
Minor Rule Violations Fine Levels,'' and would include a chart of the
first, second and third level fines that are based on the NYSE Arca
Equities Rules for the equivalent Exchange Rule, as follows:
Violations of Rule 6.3E and its Commentaries would be
eligible for a $2,000 first level fine, a $4,000 second level fine, and
a $5,000 third level fine.
Violations of Rule 2.24E would be eligible for a $2,000
first level fine, a $4,000 second level fine, and a $5,000 third level
fine.
Violations of Rule 2.21E would be eligible for a $1,000
first level fine, a $2,500 second level fine, and a $3,500 third level
fine.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The Exchange proposes to add a footnote 1 based on footnote
2 in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12 providing that, in addition to
the specified fines, the Exchange may require a violator to remit
all fees that it should have paid to the Exchange pursuant to Rule
2.21E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These fine levels are the same as those in the NYSE Arca Equities
fine schedule contained in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12(i) for each
analogous rule.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12(i)(1) (setting forth fine
levels for NYSE Arca Equities Rules 7.16, 7.23(a)(1), 7.30, 7.20(a)
and 6.15(b)); NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.12(i)(2) (setting forth
fine levels for NYSE Arca Equities Rules 6.3E and its Commentaries,
2.24, and 2.21). Rule 9217 retained the Exchange's maximum fine for
minor rule violations which, under legacy Rule 476A, was $5,000. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 77241 (February 26, 2016), 81
FR 11311 (March 3, 2016) (SR-NYSEMKT-2016-30). See also Rule 19d-1
under the Act. 17 CFR 240.19d-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New subsection (e) would be titled ``Legacy Minor Rules Fine
Schedule'' \18\ and would summarize fine amounts for individuals and
member organizations based on first, second and subsequent offenses.
These amounts would continue to govern violations of legacy minor rules
following implementation [sic] of Pillar.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See note 15, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the Exchange proposes to delete two erroneous references to
``NYSE Arca'' rules in Rule 476A (Imposition of Fines for Minor
Violation(s) of Rules) \19\ and in the list of options rule violations
and applicable fines in Rule 9217(ii)(7)(b) and replace them with
``Exchange.'' The Exchange also proposes to correct a typographical
error in Rule 476A(ii)(7)(c) and in Rule
[[Page 40054]]
9217(ii)(7)(c) by replacing ``procures'' with ``procedures.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Rule 476A is the Exchange's legacy minor rule plan and
continues to apply to matters initiated prior to April 15, 2016, the
effective date of the Exchange's new disciplinary rules, which
include Rule 9217.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary fines provide a meaningful sanction for minor or technical
violations of rules. The Exchange believes that adding recently adopted
Pillar Rules modeled on the trading rules of is affiliate NYSE Arca
Equities to the list of rules eligible for disposition pursuant to the
Exchange's MRVP and subject to the same fine levels as NYSE Arca
Equities would harmonize requirements across exchanges for the same
conduct. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, the Exchange
believes that inclusion of Rules 2.21E, 2.24E, 6.3E, 6.15E, 7.16E,
7.20E, 7.23E, and 7.30E and the accompanying fine levels based on NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 10.12 in Rule 9217 would be appropriate.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\20\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5),\21\ in particular, because it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices because it will provide the Exchange
the ability to issue a minor rule fine for violations of its rules
governing cash equities trading and market maker and electronic DMM
functions and obligations on the Pillar platform. In addition, adding
rules based on the rules of its affiliate to the Exchange's minor rule
plan and the associated fine levels would promote fairness and
consistency in the marketplace by harmonizing minor rule plan fines
across affiliated exchanges for the same conduct. Similarly, the
proposed rule change would remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market by further supporting the
Exchange's transition to a fully automated cash equities trading model
on the Pillar trading platform and, by including rules based on the
rules of its affiliated market, NYSE Arca Equities, into the Exchange's
MRVP with the same fine levels, further Pillar's goal of promoting
consistency among the Exchange, NYSE Arca, and the NYSE.
The Exchange further believes that the proposed amendments to Rule
9217 are consistent with Section 6(b)(6) of the Act,\22\ which provides
that members and persons associated with members shall be appropriately
disciplined for violation of the provisions of the rules of the
exchange, by expulsion, suspension, limitation of activities,
functions, and operations, fine, censure, being suspended or barred
from being associated with a member, or any other fitting sanction. As
noted, the proposed rule change would provide the Exchange ability to
sanction minor or technical violations of the recently adopted Pillar
Rules pursuant to the Exchange's MRVP. Moreover, as noted above, the
fine levels associated with the rule violations incorporated into Rule
9217 would be based on the rules of its affiliated market, NYSE Arca
Equities. Moreover, the Exchange believes that delineating in Rule 9217
the rules and fine levels relating to trading on the Pillar trading
platform from legacy rules relating to Floor-based trading promotes
transparency following the Exchange's transition to Pillar.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is not
designed to address any competitive issue but rather to update the
Exchange's MRVP to reflect newly adopted rules. The proposed rule
change would also support the launch of the Exchange's new fully
automated cash equities trading platform that trades all NMS Stocks and
is based on the rules of NYSE Arca Equities.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \23\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\24\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\24\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \25\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\26\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \27\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2017-06 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2017-06. This
[[Page 40055]]
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2017-06, and should be submitted on or before
September 13, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17807 Filed 8-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P