Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 36731-36732 [2017-16500]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 150 / Monday, August 7, 2017 / Notices parties in the Central Records Unit in Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.10 Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a brief summary of the argument, and a table of authorities.11 Interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Department within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice.12 Requests should contain: (1) The party’s name, address and telephone number; (2) The number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230.13 The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results of this review, the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise covered by this review.14 We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries containing subject merchandise exported by the companies under review that we determine in the final results to be part of the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate of 40.41 percent. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this review in the Federal Register.15 mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES 10 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). 12 See 19 CFR 351.310(c) 13 See 19 CFR 310(d). 14 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 15 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 11 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Aug 04, 2017 Jkt 241001 36731 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For companies that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 40.41 percent); and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. 3. Blu Logistics (China) Co., Ltd. 4. Bonroy Group Limited 5. Forehigh Trade and Industry Co., Ltd. 6. Fujian Province Jianyang Wuyi MSG Co., Ltd. 7. Golden Banyan Foodstuffs Industry Co., Ltd. 8. Henan Lotus Flower Gourmet Powder Co. 9. Hong Kong Sungiven International Food Co., Limited 10. Hulunbeier Northeast Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. 11. K&S Industry Limited 12. King Cheong Hong International 13. Langfang Meihua Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. 14. Liangshan Linghua Biotechnology Co., Ltd. 15. Lotus Health Industry Holding Group 16. Meihua Group International Trading (Hong Kong) Limited 17. Meihua Holdings Group Co., Ltd., Bazhou Branch 18. Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. 19. Pudong Prime Int’l Logistics, Inc. 20. Qinhuangdao Xingtai Trade Co., Ltd. 21. S.D. Linghua M.S.G. Incorporated Co. 22. Shandong Linghua Monosodium Glutamate Incorporated Company 23. Shanghai Totole Food Ltd. 24. Shijiazhuang Standard Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. 25. Sunrise (HK) International Enterprise Limited 26. Tongliao Meihua Biological Sci-Tech Co., Ltd. 27. Zhejiang Medicines & Health Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 315.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4). [FR Doc. 2017–16576 Filed 8–4–17; 8:45 am] Dated: August 1, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Companies Covered by This Review 1. Anhui Fresh Taste International Trade Co., Ltd. 2. Baoji Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–520–804] Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain steel nails from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Applicable August 7, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annathea Cook, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 07AUN1 36732 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 150 / Monday, August 7, 2017 / Notices Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0250. On April 27, 2011, the Department of Commerce (Department) published the notice of the AD Order on nails from the UAE.1 On April 3, 2017, the Department published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the AD Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act).2 On April 4, 2017, the Department received a notice of intent to participate from one domestic interested party: Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. (Mid Continent) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Mid Continent claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a manufacturer in the United States of a domestic like product. On May 4, 2017, the Department received a complete and adequate substantive response from Mid Continent within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 The Department received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of the AD Order. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES The merchandise covered by this order includes certain steel nails having a shaft length up to 12 inches. These imports are currently classified under subheadings 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65, and 7317.00.75 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written product description remains dispositive.5 1 See Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 27421 (May 10, 2012) (AD Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 82 FR 16159 (April 3, 2017) (Notice of Initiation). 3 See Mid Continent’s submission ‘‘Re: Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates: Entry of Appearance, Notice of Intent to Participate in Review, and APO Application’’ (April 4 2017). 4 See Mid Continent’s submission ‘‘Re: Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of Sunset review’’ (May 3, 2017). 5 For a full description of the scope of the AD Order, see Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘First Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with, and adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Aug 04, 2017 Jkt 241001 Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation of the AD Order and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order were revoked, is provided in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.6 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B0824 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed on the Internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the Department determines that revocation of the AD Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted-average dumping margins up to 184.41 percent. Notification to Interested Parties This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.218, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). 6 See PO 00000 Issues and Decision Memorandum. Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: July 28, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017–16500 Filed 8–4–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–972; A–583–848] Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents From the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on stilbenic optical brightening agents (stilbenic OBAs) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Taiwan would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’ section of this notice. DATES: Effective August 7, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eli Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1593. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On May 10, 2012, the Department published the antidumping duty orders on stilbenic OBAs from the PRC and Taiwan.1 On April 3, 2017, the 1 See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents From the People’s Republic of China: Amended E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 07AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 150 (Monday, August 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36731-36732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-520-804]


Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results 
of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce 
(the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on 
certain steel nails from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) would be likely 
to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels 
indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.

DATES: Applicable August 7, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Annathea Cook, AD/CVD Operations, 
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401

[[Page 36732]]

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0250.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  On April 27, 2011, the Department of 
Commerce (Department) published the notice of the AD Order on nails 
from the UAE.\1\ On April 3, 2017, the Department published the notice 
of initiation of the first sunset review of the AD Order, pursuant to 
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act).\2\ On April 
4, 2017, the Department received a notice of intent to participate from 
one domestic interested party: Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. (Mid 
Continent) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ 
Mid Continent claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) 
of the Act, as a manufacturer in the United States of a domestic like 
product. On May 4, 2017, the Department received a complete and 
adequate substantive response from Mid Continent within the 30-day 
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\4\ The Department 
received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties. 
As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited sunset 
review of the AD Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates: 
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 27421 (May 10, 2012) (AD Order).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 82 FR 16159 
(April 3, 2017) (Notice of Initiation).
    \3\ See Mid Continent's submission ``Re: Steel Nails from the 
United Arab Emirates: Entry of Appearance, Notice of Intent to 
Participate in Review, and APO Application'' (April 4 2017).
    \4\ See Mid Continent's submission ``Re: Certain Steel Nails 
from the United Arab Emirates: Substantive Response to Notice of 
Initiation of Sunset review'' (May 3, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order includes certain steel nails 
having a shaft length up to 12 inches. These imports are currently 
classified under subheadings 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65, and 7317.00.75 of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS 
subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes. The 
written product description remains dispositive.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For a full description of the scope of the AD Order, see 
Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Assistant Secretary 
for Enforcement and Compliance for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations, ``First Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping 
Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates: 
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results,'' dated 
concurrently with, and adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, 
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in 
the event of revocation of the AD Order and the magnitude of the 
margins likely to prevail if the order were revoked, is provided in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this 
notice.\6\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and 
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System 
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 
B0824 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a 
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed 
on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues 
and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Sunset Review

    Pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the 
Department determines that revocation of the AD Order would be likely 
to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the 
magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted-
average dumping margins up to 184.41 percent.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which 
is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 
CFR 351.218, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).

    Dated: July 28, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
    2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Review
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2017-16500 Filed 8-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P