Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 36731-36732 [2017-16500]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 150 / Monday, August 7, 2017 / Notices
parties in the Central Records Unit in
Room B8024 of the main Commerce
building. Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, must be
filed within five days after the time
limit for filing case briefs.10 Parties who
submit case or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are requested to submit with
each argument a statement of the issue,
a brief summary of the argument, and a
table of authorities.11
Interested parties who wish to request
a hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Department within 30
days of the date of publication of this
notice.12 Requests should contain: (1)
The party’s name, address and
telephone number; (2) The number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing
will be limited to those raised in the
respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a
request for a hearing is made, parties
will be notified of the time and date for
the hearing to be held at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington
DC 20230.13 The Department intends to
issue the final results of this
administrative review, which will
include the results of our analysis of all
issues raised in the case briefs, within
120 days of publication of these
preliminary results in the Federal
Register, unless extended, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of
this review, the Department will
determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise covered
by this review.14 We intend to instruct
CBP to liquidate entries containing
subject merchandise exported by the
companies under review that we
determine in the final results to be part
of the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide
rate of 40.41 percent. The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of this review in the Federal
Register.15
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
10 See
19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d); see also 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
12 See 19 CFR 351.310(c)
13 See 19 CFR 310(d).
14 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
15 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
11 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Aug 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
36731
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
review for shipments of the subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by sections
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
companies that have a separate rate, the
cash deposit rate will be that established
in the final results of this review
(except, if the rate is zero or de minimis,
then zero cash deposit will be required);
(2) for previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
not listed above that received a separate
rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of
subject merchandise that have not been
found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be that for the
PRC-wide entity (i.e., 40.41 percent);
and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the
PRC exporter that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
3. Blu Logistics (China) Co., Ltd.
4. Bonroy Group Limited
5. Forehigh Trade and Industry Co., Ltd.
6. Fujian Province Jianyang Wuyi MSG Co.,
Ltd.
7. Golden Banyan Foodstuffs Industry Co.,
Ltd.
8. Henan Lotus Flower Gourmet Powder Co.
9. Hong Kong Sungiven International Food
Co., Limited
10. Hulunbeier Northeast Fufeng
Biotechnologies Co., Ltd.
11. K&S Industry Limited
12. King Cheong Hong International
13. Langfang Meihua Bio-Technology Co.,
Ltd.
14. Liangshan Linghua Biotechnology Co.,
Ltd.
15. Lotus Health Industry Holding Group
16. Meihua Group International Trading
(Hong Kong) Limited
17. Meihua Holdings Group Co., Ltd., Bazhou
Branch
18. Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co.,
Ltd.
19. Pudong Prime Int’l Logistics, Inc.
20. Qinhuangdao Xingtai Trade Co., Ltd.
21. S.D. Linghua M.S.G. Incorporated Co.
22. Shandong Linghua Monosodium
Glutamate Incorporated Company
23. Shanghai Totole Food Ltd.
24. Shijiazhuang Standard Imp & Exp Co.,
Ltd.
25. Sunrise (HK) International Enterprise
Limited
26. Tongliao Meihua Biological Sci-Tech Co.,
Ltd.
27. Zhejiang Medicines & Health
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 315.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and
351.221(b)(4).
[FR Doc. 2017–16576 Filed 8–4–17; 8:45 am]
Dated: August 1, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Companies Covered by This Review
1. Anhui Fresh Taste International Trade Co.,
Ltd.
2. Baoji Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–520–804]
Certain Steel Nails From the United
Arab Emirates: Final Results of the
Expedited First Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on
certain steel nails from the United Arab
Emirates (UAE) would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the levels indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
DATES: Applicable August 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Annathea Cook, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
36732
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 150 / Monday, August 7, 2017 / Notices
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0250.
On April
27, 2011, the Department of Commerce
(Department) published the notice of the
AD Order on nails from the UAE.1 On
April 3, 2017, the Department published
the notice of initiation of the first sunset
review of the AD Order, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (Act).2 On April 4, 2017,
the Department received a notice of
intent to participate from one domestic
interested party: Mid Continent Steel &
Wire, Inc. (Mid Continent) within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Mid Continent
claimed interested party status under
section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a
manufacturer in the United States of a
domestic like product. On May 4, 2017,
the Department received a complete and
adequate substantive response from Mid
Continent within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4
The Department received no substantive
responses from respondent interested
parties. As a result, pursuant to section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
conducted an expedited sunset review
of the AD Order.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
The merchandise covered by this
order includes certain steel nails having
a shaft length up to 12 inches. These
imports are currently classified under
subheadings 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65,
and 7317.00.75 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
The HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes. The
written product description remains
dispositive.5
1 See Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab
Emirates: Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order,
77 FR 27421 (May 10, 2012) (AD Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 82
FR 16159 (April 3, 2017) (Notice of Initiation).
3 See Mid Continent’s submission ‘‘Re: Steel Nails
from the United Arab Emirates: Entry of
Appearance, Notice of Intent to Participate in
Review, and APO Application’’ (April 4 2017).
4 See Mid Continent’s submission ‘‘Re: Certain
Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates:
Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of
Sunset review’’ (May 3, 2017).
5 For a full description of the scope of the AD
Order, see Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
‘‘First Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from the United
Arab Emirates: Issues and Decision Memorandum
for the Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with, and
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Aug 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues
raised in this sunset review, including
the likelihood of continuation or
recurrence of dumping in the event of
revocation of the AD Order and the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the order were revoked, is
provided in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice.6 The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B0824 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the
Department determines that revocation
of the AD Order would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, and that the magnitude of the
dumping margins likely to prevail
would be weighted-average dumping
margins up to 184.41 percent.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act, 19 CFR 351.218, and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(5)(ii).
6 See
PO 00000
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: July 28, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to
Prevail
VII. Final Results of Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–16500 Filed 8–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–972; A–583–848]
Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening
Agents From the People’s Republic of
China and Taiwan: Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset
reviews, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty orders on
stilbenic optical brightening agents
(stilbenic OBAs) from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC) and Taiwan
would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping, at the levels
indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset
Reviews’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective August 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eli
Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1593.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On May 10, 2012, the Department
published the antidumping duty orders
on stilbenic OBAs from the PRC and
Taiwan.1 On April 3, 2017, the
1 See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents
From the People’s Republic of China: Amended
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 150 (Monday, August 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36731-36732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16500]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-520-804]
Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results
of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on
certain steel nails from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels
indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable August 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annathea Cook, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
[[Page 36732]]
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0250.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 27, 2011, the Department of
Commerce (Department) published the notice of the AD Order on nails
from the UAE.\1\ On April 3, 2017, the Department published the notice
of initiation of the first sunset review of the AD Order, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act).\2\ On April
4, 2017, the Department received a notice of intent to participate from
one domestic interested party: Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. (Mid
Continent) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\
Mid Continent claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C)
of the Act, as a manufacturer in the United States of a domestic like
product. On May 4, 2017, the Department received a complete and
adequate substantive response from Mid Continent within the 30-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\4\ The Department
received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties.
As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited sunset
review of the AD Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates:
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 27421 (May 10, 2012) (AD Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 82 FR 16159
(April 3, 2017) (Notice of Initiation).
\3\ See Mid Continent's submission ``Re: Steel Nails from the
United Arab Emirates: Entry of Appearance, Notice of Intent to
Participate in Review, and APO Application'' (April 4 2017).
\4\ See Mid Continent's submission ``Re: Certain Steel Nails
from the United Arab Emirates: Substantive Response to Notice of
Initiation of Sunset review'' (May 3, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order includes certain steel nails
having a shaft length up to 12 inches. These imports are currently
classified under subheadings 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65, and 7317.00.75 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes. The
written product description remains dispositive.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For a full description of the scope of the AD Order, see
Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations, ``First Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates:
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results,'' dated
concurrently with, and adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review,
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in
the event of revocation of the AD Order and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the order were revoked, is provided in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this
notice.\6\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room
B0824 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed
on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues
and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the
Department determines that revocation of the AD Order would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the
magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted-
average dumping margins up to 184.41 percent.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19
CFR 351.218, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: July 28, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017-16500 Filed 8-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
