Furfuryl Alcohol From China; Determination, 36154-36155 [2017-16324]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
36154
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2017 / Notices
Bikes LLC (‘‘Jetson’’) of New York City,
New York; and Newegg, Inc.
(‘‘Newegg’’) of City of Industry,
California. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a party to
the investigation. Id. Eight respondents
remain in the investigation, i.e., Chic,
Swagway, Modell’s, Powerboard, Skque,
Alibaba, Jetson, and Newegg
(collectively, ‘‘respondents’’). Every
other respondent was terminated from
the investigation based on a consent
order stipulation and proposed consent
order or good cause, or was found in
default.
On August 10 and November 17,
2016, respectively, the Commission
issued notice of its determinations not
to review the ALJ’s IDs (Order Nos. 11
and 22) terminating the investigation as
to Contixo based on a consent order
stipulation and proposed consent order,
and as to InMotion based on a consent
order stipulation, proposed consent
order, and settlement agreement. On
October 19 and 27, 2016, respectively,
the Commission issued notice of its
determinations not to review the ALJ’s
IDs (Order Nos. 19 and 20) terminating
the investigation as to claim 9 of the
’278 patent and claim 4 of the patent.
On September 7, October 11, and
December 13, 2016, respectively, the
Commission issued notice of its
determinations not to review the ALJ’s
IDs (Order Nos. 14, 18, and 26) finding
respondents GyroGlyder, Soibatian,
PhunkeeDuck, Jomo, Kebe, Supersun,
Twizzle, and Uwheels in default,
respondents Joy Hoverboard,
Chenduoxing, Shareconn, RMT, and
Cyboard in default, and respondents
HoverTech, Leray, and Spaceboard in
default, respectively. On January 17,
2017, the Commission issued notice of
its determination not to review the ALJ’s
ID (Order No. 27) terminating the
investigation as to Genius Technologies
for good cause. On February 15, 2017,
the Commission issued notice of its
determination not to review the ALJ’s ID
(Order No. 42) granting complainants’
unopposed motion to terminate the
investigation as to their Lanham Act,
common law, and state unfair and
deceptive trade practices allegations
under section 337(a)(1)(A).
On May 26, 2017, the ALJ issued his
final ID and recommended
determination (‘‘RD’’) on remedy and
bonding. The ID finds that Alibaba is
not an agent of the other respondents
and therefore is not within the
jurisdiction of section 337. It also finds
that none of the respondents’ accused
products infringe the ’278 patent, but
that all of the defaulting respondents’
accused products infringe the asserted
patent based on taking the allegations in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Aug 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
the complaint as true. The ID also finds
that the technical prong of the domestic
industry requirement was not satisfied
with respect to the ’278 patent. The
cover page of the ID/RD, however, states
that a violation of section 337 was
found, page 75 of the ID/RD states that
a violation was found as to the
defaulting respondents, and the
separately issued ‘‘Notice Regarding
Initial Determination on Violation of
Section 337 and Recommended
Determination on Remedy and Bond’’
(May 26, 2017) (‘‘Notice Regarding the
ID’’) states that a violation of section 337
was found. On June 5, 2017, the ALJ
issued an erratum clarifying that there
was no violation of section 337 because
complainants had not satisfied the
technical prong of the domestic industry
requirement. He also issued a corrected
ID/RD and Notice Regarding the ID on
June 5, 2017; however, the error on page
75 of the ID/RD was not corrected. The
Commission clarifies that the erratum
also applies to (1) page 75 of the ID/RD
and corrects that page to delete the
statement that a violation has been
found as to the defaulting respondents;
and (2) footnote 47 on the same page,
and corrects the footnote by striking
‘‘infringe the ’278 patent’’ and
substituting ‘‘violate section 337’’.
On June 12, 2017, OUII,
complainants, respondent Chic, and a
group of three respondents (Swagway,
Modell’s, and Newegg) filed separate
petitions for review of the final ID. On
June 20, 2017, OUII, complainants,
respondent Jetson, respondent Alibaba,
and a group of four respondents
(Swagway, Modell’s, Chic, and Newegg)
filed separate responses to the opposing
petitions.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the ID, the
parties’ petitions for review, and the
responses thereto, the Commission has
determined to review-in-part the final
ID. Specifically, the Commission has
determined to review (1) the ID’s
finding that the Commission has no
jurisdiction over Alibaba; and (2) the
ID’s analysis regarding infringement by
the defaulting respondents. The
Commission has determined not to
review the remainder of the final ID.
On review with respect to issue (1),
the Commission determines to take no
position on the ID’s finding that the
Commission has no jurisdiction over
Alibaba. On review with respect to issue
(2), the Commission vacates the ID’s
findings in the last paragraph on page
39 (and paragraph 5 on page 72, as well
as the first sentence on page 83) that
complainants have established that the
defaulting respondents infringe the ’278
patent. These respondents have been
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
found in default by virtue of their
failure to respond to the complaint and
notice of investigation. See Comm’n
Notice (September 7, 2016); Comm’n
Notice (October 11, 2016); Comm’n
Notice (December 13, 2016). Section
337(g)(1), 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1), provides
the conditions and procedures
applicable for issuing a default remedy.
In light of the Commission’s
determination not to review the
remainder of the final ID, including but
not limited to the finding that the
technical prong of the domestic industry
requirement for the ’278 patent has not
been satisfied, the analysis under
Section 337(g)(1) is moot.
The Commission therefore affirms the
ID’s finding of no violation of section
337 and terminates the investigation.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part
210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 28, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–16325 Filed 8–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–703 (Fourth
Review)]
Furfuryl Alcohol From China;
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on furfuryl
alcohol from China would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),
instituted this review on January 3, 2017
(82 FR 140) and determined on April 10,
2017, that it would conduct an
expedited review (82 FR 23063, May 19,
2017).
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2017 / Notices
The Commission made this
determination pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determination in
this review on July 28, 2017. The views
of the Commission are contained in
USITC Publication 4708 (July 2017),
entitled Furfuryl Alcohol from China:
Investigation No. 731–TA–703 (Fourth
Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 28, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–16324 Filed 8–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140–0019]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Federal
Firearms License (FFL) RENEWAL
Application—ATF F 8 (5310.11) Part 11
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will
submit the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection
was previously published in the
[Federal Register, on May 25, 2017,
allowing for a 60-day comment period].
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for an additional 30
days until September 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments,
particularly with respect to the
estimated public burden or associated
response time, have suggestions, need a
copy of the proposed information
collection instrument with instructions,
or desire any other additional
information, please contact Tracey
Robertson, Chief, Federal Firearms
Licensing Center either by mail at 244
Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 25405,
by email at Tracey.Robertson@atf.gov.
Written comments and/or suggestions
can also be directed to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Aug 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or sent
to OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension, without change, of a
currently approved collection.
(2) The Title of the Form/Collection:
Federal Firearms License (FFL)
RENEWAL Application.
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
(4) Form number: ATF F 8 (5310.11)
Part 11.
Component: Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S.
Department of Justice.
(5) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: Business or other for-profit.
Other: Individuals or households.
Abstract: The form is filed by the
licensee desiring to renew a Federal
firearms license. It is used to identify
the applicant, locate the business/
collection premises, identify the type of
business/collection activity, and
determine the eligibility of the
applicant.
(6) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: An estimated 35,000
respondents will utilize the form, and it
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36155
will take each respondent 30 minutes to
complete the form.
(7) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The estimated annual public
burden associated with this collection is
17,500 hours which is equal to (35,000
(total # of respondents * .5 (30 minutes).
If additional information is required
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405A,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: July 31, 2017.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2017–16330 Filed 8–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation
[OMB Number 1110–0046]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Revision of a
Currently Approved Collection Friction
Ridge Cards: Arrest and Institution
FD–249; Applicant FD–258; Personal
Identification FD–353; FBI Standard
Palm Print FD–884; Supplemental
Finger and Palm Print FD–884a
Criminal Justice Information
Services Division, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI), Criminal Justice Information
Services (CJIS) Division has submitted
the following information collection
renewal to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review in
accordance with established review
procedures of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. The proposed information
collection was previously published in
the Federal Register on June 5, 2017
allowing for a 60 day comment period.
DATES: Comments are encourages and
will be accepted for an additional 30
day until September 5, 2017.
If you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Gerry Lynn Brovey, Supervisory
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 148 (Thursday, August 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36154-36155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16324]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-703 (Fourth Review)]
Furfuryl Alcohol From China; Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
review, the United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on furfuryl
alcohol from China would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)), instituted this review on January 3, 2017 (82 FR 140) and
determined on April 10, 2017, that it would conduct an expedited review
(82 FR 23063, May 19, 2017).
[[Page 36155]]
The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its
determination in this review on July 28, 2017. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4708 (July 2017),
entitled Furfuryl Alcohol from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-703
(Fourth Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 28, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-16324 Filed 8-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P