Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Notice of Amended Final Determination and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, 35181-35182 [2017-15944]
Download as PDF
35181
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Notices
Commission at (312) 353–8324, or
emailed to Carolyn Allen at callen@
usccr.gov. Persons who desire
additional information may contact the
Midwestern Regional Office at (312)
353–8311.
Records generated from this meeting
may be inspected and reproduced at the
Midwestern Regional Office, as they
become available, both before and after
the meeting. Records of the meeting will
be available via www.facadatabase.gov
under the Commission on Civil Rights,
Louisiana Advisory Committee link
(https://database.faca.gov/committee/
committee.aspx?cid=251&aid=17).
Persons interested in the work of this
Committee are directed to the
Commission’s Web site, https://
www.usccr.gov, or may contact the
Midwestern Regional Office at the above
email or street address.
in the LTFV investigation of OCTG from
Taiwan have received weighted-average
dumping margins of zero and, therefore,
the Department is hereby revoking this
order.
DATES:
Applicable July 22, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hermes Pinilla, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3477.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
From Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision
Not in Harmony With Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, Notice of Amended Final
Determination and Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Order
On August 8, 2014, the Department
published the LTFV Final in this
proceeding.1 The Department reached
an affirmative determination that certain
OCTG was being, or likely to be, sold at
less than fair value, for mandatory
respondent, Tension Steel Industries
Co., Ltd. (Tension Steel). Tension Steel
appealed the LTFV Final to the CIT, and
on May 16, 2016, the CIT remanded the
final determination.2 Specifically, the
CIT remanded the LTFV Final directing
the Department to grant all of Tension
Steel’s claimed rebate adjustments,
including where the conditions of the
rebate were unknown to the customer at
the time of sale.3
On July 15, 2016, the Department
issued its final results of
redetermination pursuant to remand in
accordance with the CIT’s order.4 On
remand, the Department, under
respectful protest,5 granted all of
Tension Steel’s reported rebates and
recalculated the margin for Tension
Steel accordingly. On July 12, 2017, the
CIT sustained the Department’s Remand
Order.6 Thus, the effective date of this
notice is July 22, 2017.
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 12, 2017, the United
States Court of International Trade (CIT)
entered its final judgment sustaining the
final results of remand redetermination
pursuant to court order by the
Department of Commerce (Department)
pertaining to the less-than-fair-value
(LTFV) investigation of certain oil
country tubular goods (OCTG) from
Taiwan. The Department is notifying the
public that the final judgment in this
case is not in harmony with the
Department’s final determination in the
LTFV investigation of OCTG from
Taiwan. Pursuant to the CIT’s final
judgment, both mandatory respondents
1 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Taiwan: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, 79 FR 41979 (July 18, 2014); amended
in Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Taiwan:
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value, 79 FR 46403 (August 8, 2014)
(LTFV Final).
2 See Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. v. United
States, 179 F. Supp. 3d 1185 (CIT 2016) (Remand
Order).
3 See Remand Order, 179 F. Supp. 3d at 1190–91.
4 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Remand, Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. v.
United States, Consol. Court No. 14–00218, Slip
Op. 16–51, dated July 15, 2016 (Final
Redetermination). See also, https://
enforcement.trade.gov/remands/16-51.pdf.
5 See Viraj Group, Ltd. v. United States, 343 F.3d
1371 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
6 See Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. v. United
States, Slip Op. 17–84, Consol. Court No. 14–00218
(CIT July 12, 2017) (Final Remand Order).
Agenda
Welcome and Roll Call
Civil Rights Topics in Louisiana
Next Steps
Public Comment
Adjournment
Dated: July 24, 2017.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2017–15893 Filed 7–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–850]
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,7 as clarified
by Diamond Sawblades,8 the Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal
Circuit) held that, pursuant to section
516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the Department
must publish a notice of court decision
that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a
Department determination and must
suspend liquidation of entries pending
a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.9 The
CIT’s July 12, 2017, judgment
constitutes a final decision of that court
that is not in harmony with the
Department’s original affirmative
determination in the LTFV Final. Thus,
this notice is published in fulfillment of
the publication requirements of Timken
and section 516A of the Act.
Accordingly, the Department intends
to issue instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection to suspend
liquidation of all unliquidated entries of
subject merchandise from Taiwan
which are entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
July 22, 2017, which is ten days after the
court’s decision in accordance with
section 516A of the Act. The companyspecific cash deposit rate will be zero
percent. Pursuant to Timken, Diamond
Sawblades, and Hosiden Corporation v.
United States, 861 F. Supp. 115 (Fed.
Cir. 1994), the suspension of liquidation
on all entries of OCTG from Taiwan
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after July 22,
2017, that remain unliquidated, will be
suspended during the pendency of the
appeals process so that they may be
liquidated in accordance with a ‘‘final
and conclusive’’ court decision.
Amended Final Determination
Because there is now a final court
decision, the Department is amending
the LTFV Final with respect to Tension
Steel. The revised weighted-average
dumping margin for Tension Steel for
the period July 1, 2012, through June 30,
2013, is as follows:
Exporter or producer
Tension Steel Industries Co.,
Ltd .....................................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
0.00
7 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d. 337
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
8 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d. 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(Diamond Sawblades).
9 See Sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
35182
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Notices
Revocation of the Order
Pursuant to section 735(c)(2) of the
Act, ‘‘the investigation shall be
terminated upon publication of that
negative determination’’ and the
Department shall ‘‘terminate the
suspension of liquidation’’ and ‘‘release
any bond or other security and refund
any cash deposit.’’ 10 As a result of this
amended final determination, the
Department is hereby revoking the
antidumping duty order and releasing
any bonds or other security and
refunding cash deposits with respect to
Tension Steel.
Pursuant to the Federal Circuit’s
decision in Diamond Sawblades 11 and
the CIT’s decision affirming the
Department’s remand redetermination,
the Department is revoking the
antidumping duty order on OCTG from
Taiwan because the revised weightedaverage dumping margin for Tension
Steel is now zero, and because the
Department also calculated a zero
margin for the only other mandatory
respondent in the underlying
investigation. As a result of this
revocation, the Department will not
initiate any new administrative reviews
of this antidumping duty Order.12
Although section 735(c)(2)(A) of the
Act instructs the Department to
terminate suspension of liquidation,
here, because suspension of liquidation
must continue during the pendency of
the appeals process (in accordance with
Timken and as discussed above), we
will continue to instruct CBP at this
time to (A) continue suspension at a
cash deposit rate of zero percent until
instructed otherwise; and (B) release
any bond or other security, and refund
any cash deposit made pursuant to
OCTG From Taiwan: Antidumping Duty
Order.13 In the event that the court’s
ruling in the Final Remand Order is not
appealed, or appealed and upheld by
the CAFC, the Department will instruct
CBP to terminate the suspension of
10 See
sections 735(c)(2)(A) and (B) of the Act.
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d. 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(Diamond Sawblades).
12 Currently there are no unfinished or ongoing
administrative reviews of this order. Further, we
rescinded the 2015/2016 administrative review on
March 1, 2017, and this was the last administrative
review completed in this proceeding. See Certain
Oil Country Tubular Goods from Taiwan:
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 12197 (March 1, 2017).
13 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic
of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil Country
Tubular Goods from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 53691 (September 10,
2014) (OCTG From Taiwan: Antidumping Duty
Order).
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
11 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
liquidation and to liquidate those
entries of subject merchandise without
regard to antidumping duties.
Notwithstanding the continued
suspension described above, the
antidumping duty order on OCTG from
Taiwan is hereby revoked, also
described above.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of the APO is a violation
subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 24, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–15944 Filed 7–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–857]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
From India: Notice of Correction to
Amended Final Determination and
Amendment of Antidumping Duty
Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In the Final Determination, the
Department determined that GVN Fuels
Limited, Maharashtra Seamless Limited,
and Jindal Pipes Limited are affiliated,
pursuant to section 771(33)(F) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and should be collapsed and treated as
a single entity, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.401(f).1
On March 16, 2017, the United States
Court of International Trade (CIT)
entered final judgment sustaining the
final results of remand redetermination
pursuant to court order by the
Department of Commerce (Department)
pertaining to the less-than-fair-value
investigation of certain oil country
tubular goods (OCTG) from India.2 On
April 12, 2017, the Department
published the Amended Final
Determination on OCTG from India.3 On
June 20, 2017, the Department
published the Amended Order.4 In both
the Amended Final Determination and
Amended Order, the Department
inadvertently omitted a statement to
explain that, consistent with the Final
Determination,5 GVN Fuels Limited,
Maharashtra Seamless Limited, and
Jindal Pipes Limited should be treated
as a single entity.
Correction
We are correcting the Amended Final
Determination and Amended Order to
clarify that GVN Fuels Limited,
Maharashtra Seamless Limited, and
Jindal Pipes Limited should be treated
as a single entity (collectively, GVN or
the GVN single entity). The sections of
the Amended Final Determination and
Amended Order explaining the
suspension of liquidation and listing the
weighted-average antidumping duty
margins and cash deposit rates should
have appeared as provided below.
Correction to the Amended Final
Determination
Amended Final Determination
Because there is now a final court
decision, the Department is amending
the Final Determination with respect to
the GVN single entity (comprised of
1 See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of
Critical Circumstances: Certain Oil Country Tubular
Good from India, 79 FR 41981, 41982 (July 18,
2014) (Final Determination), and accompanying
issues and decision memorandum (IDM) at
Comment 9.
2 See United States Steel Corporation et al. v.
United States, Slip Op. 17–28, Consolidated Court
No. 14–00263 (CIT 2017).
3 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
India: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony
With Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical
Circumstances and Notice of Amended Final
Determination, 82 FR 17631 (April 12, 2017)
(Amended Final Determination).
4 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
India: Amendment of Antidumping Duty Order, 82
FR 28045 (June 20, 2017) (Amended Order).
5 See Final Determination, 79 FR at, 41982, and
accompanying issues and decision memorandum
(IDM) at Comment 9.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 144 (Friday, July 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35181-35182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15944]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-850]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From Taiwan: Notice of Court
Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, Notice of Amended Final Determination and Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 12, 2017, the United States Court of International
Trade (CIT) entered its final judgment sustaining the final results of
remand redetermination pursuant to court order by the Department of
Commerce (Department) pertaining to the less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation of certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Taiwan.
The Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this
case is not in harmony with the Department's final determination in the
LTFV investigation of OCTG from Taiwan. Pursuant to the CIT's final
judgment, both mandatory respondents in the LTFV investigation of OCTG
from Taiwan have received weighted-average dumping margins of zero and,
therefore, the Department is hereby revoking this order.
DATES: Applicable July 22, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hermes Pinilla, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3477.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 8, 2014, the Department published the LTFV Final in this
proceeding.\1\ The Department reached an affirmative determination that
certain OCTG was being, or likely to be, sold at less than fair value,
for mandatory respondent, Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. (Tension
Steel). Tension Steel appealed the LTFV Final to the CIT, and on May
16, 2016, the CIT remanded the final determination.\2\ Specifically,
the CIT remanded the LTFV Final directing the Department to grant all
of Tension Steel's claimed rebate adjustments, including where the
conditions of the rebate were unknown to the customer at the time of
sale.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Taiwan: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 41979 (July
18, 2014); amended in Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Taiwan:
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR
46403 (August 8, 2014) (LTFV Final).
\2\ See Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States, 179
F. Supp. 3d 1185 (CIT 2016) (Remand Order).
\3\ See Remand Order, 179 F. Supp. 3d at 1190-91.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 15, 2016, the Department issued its final results of
redetermination pursuant to remand in accordance with the CIT's
order.\4\ On remand, the Department, under respectful protest,\5\
granted all of Tension Steel's reported rebates and recalculated the
margin for Tension Steel accordingly. On July 12, 2017, the CIT
sustained the Department's Remand Order.\6\ Thus, the effective date of
this notice is July 22, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand,
Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Court
No. 14-00218, Slip Op. 16-51, dated July 15, 2016 (Final
Redetermination). See also, https://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/16-51.pdf.
\5\ See Viraj Group, Ltd. v. United States, 343 F.3d 1371 (Fed.
Cir. 2003).
\6\ See Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States,
Slip Op. 17-84, Consol. Court No. 14-00218 (CIT July 12, 2017)
(Final Remand Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\7\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\8\
the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) held
that, pursuant to section 516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), the Department must publish a notice of court decision that
is not ``in harmony'' with a Department determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision.\9\ The
CIT's July 12, 2017, judgment constitutes a final decision of that
court that is not in harmony with the Department's original affirmative
determination in the LTFV Final. Thus, this notice is published in
fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken and section 516A
of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d. 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\8\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626
F.3d. 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
\9\ See Sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, the Department intends to issue instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of all
unliquidated entries of subject merchandise from Taiwan which are
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after July
22, 2017, which is ten days after the court's decision in accordance
with section 516A of the Act. The company-specific cash deposit rate
will be zero percent. Pursuant to Timken, Diamond Sawblades, and
Hosiden Corporation v. United States, 861 F. Supp. 115 (Fed. Cir.
1994), the suspension of liquidation on all entries of OCTG from Taiwan
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after July
22, 2017, that remain unliquidated, will be suspended during the
pendency of the appeals process so that they may be liquidated in
accordance with a ``final and conclusive'' court decision.
Amended Final Determination
Because there is now a final court decision, the Department is
amending the LTFV Final with respect to Tension Steel. The revised
weighted-average dumping margin for Tension Steel for the period July
1, 2012, through June 30, 2013, is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average dumping
Exporter or producer margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd...................... 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 35182]]
Revocation of the Order
Pursuant to section 735(c)(2) of the Act, ``the investigation shall
be terminated upon publication of that negative determination'' and the
Department shall ``terminate the suspension of liquidation'' and
``release any bond or other security and refund any cash deposit.''
\10\ As a result of this amended final determination, the Department is
hereby revoking the antidumping duty order and releasing any bonds or
other security and refunding cash deposits with respect to Tension
Steel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See sections 735(c)(2)(A) and (B) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the Federal Circuit's decision in Diamond Sawblades
\11\ and the CIT's decision affirming the Department's remand
redetermination, the Department is revoking the antidumping duty order
on OCTG from Taiwan because the revised weighted-average dumping margin
for Tension Steel is now zero, and because the Department also
calculated a zero margin for the only other mandatory respondent in the
underlying investigation. As a result of this revocation, the
Department will not initiate any new administrative reviews of this
antidumping duty Order.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626
F.3d. 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
\12\ Currently there are no unfinished or ongoing administrative
reviews of this order. Further, we rescinded the 2015/2016
administrative review on March 1, 2017, and this was the last
administrative review completed in this proceeding. See Certain Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Taiwan: Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 12197 (March 1, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although section 735(c)(2)(A) of the Act instructs the Department
to terminate suspension of liquidation, here, because suspension of
liquidation must continue during the pendency of the appeals process
(in accordance with Timken and as discussed above), we will continue to
instruct CBP at this time to (A) continue suspension at a cash deposit
rate of zero percent until instructed otherwise; and (B) release any
bond or other security, and refund any cash deposit made pursuant to
OCTG From Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order.\13\ In the event that the
court's ruling in the Final Remand Order is not appealed, or appealed
and upheld by the CAFC, the Department will instruct CBP to terminate
the suspension of liquidation and to liquidate those entries of subject
merchandise without regard to antidumping duties. Notwithstanding the
continued suspension described above, the antidumping duty order on
OCTG from Taiwan is hereby revoked, also described above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, the
Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, and the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil
Country Tubular Goods from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR
53691 (September 10, 2014) (OCTG From Taiwan: Antidumping Duty
Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of the APO is a violation subject to
sanction.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 24, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-15944 Filed 7-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P