Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Updates for the CBOE Fees Schedule, 34560-34563 [2017-15529]
Download as PDF
34560
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2017 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that
the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s Office of Compliance
Inspections and Examinations (‘‘OCIE’’)
will host a public conference,
characterized as a ‘‘Compliance
Outreach Program for Broker-Dealers,’’
on Thursday, July 27, 2017, in the
Auditorium, Room L–002 at the
Commission’s headquarters, 100 F
Street NE., Washington, DC 20549. The
conference will begin at 10:30 a.m. (ET).
Seating will be on a first-come, firstserved basis. Doors will open at 9:00
a.m. Visitors will be subject to security
checks. The conference will be webcast
on the Commission’s Web site at
www.sec.gov.
On May 3, 2017, the Commission
issued notice of the conference
indicating that the conference is open to
the public. This Sunshine Act notice is
being issued because a quorum of the
Commission may attend.
The agenda for the conference
includes: Opening remarks by Chairman
Jay Clayton; a panel discussion with
insights from Michael Piwowar,
Commissioner, Securities and Exchange
Commission, Robert Cook, President
and CEO of FINRA (Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority), and moderated
by Peter Driscoll, Acting Director, OCIE;
a panel discussion addressing certain
broker-dealer hot topics, including antimoney laundering, conflicts of interest,
recidivist and high risk brokers and dual
registrants.
Other panels include a discussion of
issues relating to senior investors and
those investing for retirement and a
discussion addressing current
cybersecurity threats impacting brokerdealers and the securities markets,
including mitigation approaches.
For further information, please
contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of
the Secretary at (202) 551–5400.
Dated: July 20, 2017.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–15627 Filed 7–21–17; 11:15 am]
[Release No. 34–81170; File No. SR–CBOE–
2017–055]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Updates for
the CBOE Fees Schedule
July 19, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 11,
2017, Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to make a
number of changes to its Fees Schedule,
effective immediately.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s Web
site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:30 Jul 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Fmt 4703
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to make a
number of changes to its Fees
Schedule.3
VIX License Index Surcharge Waiver
The Exchange proposes to extend the
current waiver of the VIX Index License
Surcharge of $0.10 per contract for
Clearing Trading Permit Holder
Proprietary (‘‘Firm’’) (origin codes ‘‘F’’
or ‘‘L’’) VIX orders that have a premium
of $0.10 or lower and have series with
an expiration of seven (7) calendar days
or less. The Exchange adopted the
current waiver to reduce transaction
costs on expiring, low-priced VIX
options, which the Exchange believed
would encourage Firms to seek to close
and/or roll over such positions close to
expiration at low premium levels,
including facilitating customers to do
so, in order to free up capital and
encourage additional trading. The
Exchange had proposed to waive the
surcharge through June 30, 2017. The
Exchange proposes to extend the waiver
of the surcharge through December 31,
2017, at which time the Exchange will
reevaluate whether the waiver has
continued to prompt Firms to close and
roll over positions close to expiration at
low premium levels.
Extended Trading Hour Fees Waiver
In order to promote and encourage
trading during the Extended Trading
Hours (‘‘ETH’’) session, the Exchange
currently waives ETH Trading Permit
and Bandwidth Packet fees for one (1)
of each initial Trading Permits and one
(1) of each initial Bandwidth Packet, per
affiliated TPH. The Exchange notes that
waiver is set to expire June 30, 2017.
The Exchange also waives fees through
June 30, 2017 for a CMI and FIX login
ID if the CMI and/or FIX login ID is
related to a waived ETH Trading Permit
and/or waived Bandwidth packet. In
order to continue to promote trading
during ETH, the Exchange wishes to
extend these waivers through December
31, 2017.
RLG, RLV, RUI, AWDE, FTEM, FXTM
and UKXM Transaction Fees Waiver
The Exchange was recently
authorized to list options on seven FTSE
Russell Indexes (i.e., Russell 1000
Growth Index (‘‘RLG’’), Russell 1000
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee
change on June 29, 2017 (SR–CBOE–2017–053). On
July 11, 2017, the Exchange withdrew that filing
and submitted this filing.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00089
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2017 / Notices
Value Index (‘‘RLV’’), Russell 1000
Index (‘‘RUI’’), FTSE Developed Europe
Index (‘‘AWDE’’), FTSE Emerging
Markets Index (‘‘FTEM’’), China 50
Index ‘‘(FXTM’’) and FTSE 100 Index
(‘‘UKXM’’)). In order to promote and
encourage trading of these products, the
Exchange currently waives all
transaction fees (including the Floor
Brokerage Fee, Index License Surcharge
and CFLEX Surcharge Fee) for each of
these products. This waiver however is
set to expire June 30, 2017. In order to
continue to promote trading of these
options classes, the Exchange proposes
to extend the fee waiver of through
December 31, 2017.
AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and UKXM DPM
Payment Extension
The Exchange currently offers a
compensation plan to the Designated
Primary Market-Maker(s) (‘‘DPM(s)’’)
appointed in AWDE, FTEM, FXTM or
UKXM to offset the initial DPM costs.
Specifically, the Fees Schedule provides
that DPM(s) appointed for an entire
month in these classes will receive a
payment of $7,500 per class per month
through June 30, 2017. The Exchange
notes that DPMs appointed in these
products still have ongoing costs, which
the Exchange desires to continue to help
offset. As such, the Exchange proposes
to extend the DPM payment plan
through December 31, 2017.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
FLEX Asian and Cliquet Flex Trader
Incentive Program Extension
By way of background, a FLEX Trader
is entitled to a pro-rata share of the
monthly compensation pool based on
the customer order fees collected from
customer orders traded against that
FLEX Trader’s orders with origin codes
other than ‘‘C’’ in FLEX Broad-Based
Index Options with Asian or Cliquet
style settlement (‘‘Exotics’’) each month
(‘‘Incentive Program’’). The Fees
Schedule provides that the Incentive
Program is set to expire either by June
30, 2017 or until total average daily
volume in Exotics exceeds 15,000
contracts for three consecutive months,
whichever comes first. The Exchange
notes that total average daily volume in
Exotics has not yet exceeded 15,000
contracts for three consecutive months.
In order to continue to incentivize FLEX
Traders to provide liquidity in FLEX
Asian and Cliquet options, the Exchange
proposes to extend the program to
December 31, 2017 or until total average
daily volume in Exotics exceeds 15,000
contracts for three consecutive months,
whichever comes first.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:30 Jul 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
RVX DPM Payment
The Exchange proposes to offer a
compensation plan for the DPM
appointed in CBOE Russell 2000
Volatility Index (‘‘RVX’’) to offset
associated DPM costs, similar to the
compensation plan offered to DPM(s)
appointed in AWDE, FTEM, FXTM or
UKXM. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to provide that the DPM
appointed for an entire month in RVX
will receive a payment of $8,500
through December 31, 2017. The
Exchange notes that a DPM appointed in
this product has ongoing costs, which
the Exchange desires to continue to help
offset so that the DPM may continue to
meet its obligations.
Volume Incentive Program
The Exchange also proposes to amend
its Volume Incentive Program (‘‘VIP’’).
By way of background, under VIP, the
Exchange credits each Trading Permit
Holder (‘‘TPH’’) the per contract amount
set forth in the VIP table resulting from
each public customer (‘‘C’’ origin code)
order transmitted by that TPH (with
certain exceptions) which is executed
electronically on the Exchange,
provided the TPH meets certain volume
thresholds in a month.4 The Exchange
proposes to provide that Professional
Customers and Voluntary Professionals
(‘‘Professional Customers’’) (origin code
‘‘W’’), Broker-Dealers (origin code ‘‘B’’)
and Joint Back-Offices (‘‘JBO’’) (origin
code ‘‘J’’) orders would also count
towards the qualifying volume
thresholds. The Exchange believes the
inclusion of Professional Customer,
Broker-Dealer and JBO orders in the
qualifying thresholds will encourage
TPHs to execute more Professional
Customer, Broker-Dealer and JBO
orders. The Exchange notes however,
that while these orders would now
count towards the qualifying volume
thresholds, the Exchange would not pay
credits to the executing TPH for these
orders (i.e., only Customer orders (origin
code ‘‘C’’) would continue to receive the
credits under the program).
Footnote 25 Clarification
The Exchange proposes to clarify an
inadvertent omission in Footnote 25 of
the Fees Schedule. By way of
background, Footnote 25, which governs
rebates on Floor Broker Trading Permits,
currently provides that any Floor Broker
that executes a certain average of
customer open-outcry contracts per day
over the course of a calendar month in
all underlying symbols excluding
Underlying Symbol List A (except RLG,
4 See CBOE Fees Schedule, Volume Incentive
Program.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34561
RLV, RUI, AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and
UKXM), DJX, XSP, XSPAM and
subcabinet trades (‘‘Qualifying
Symbols’’), will receive a rebate on that
TPH’s Floor Broker Trading Permit fees.
The Exchange notes that it inadvertently
failed to include a reference to
‘‘subcabinet trades’’ in the last sentence
of the footnote (i.e., when referencing
which options are excluded from the
qualifying thresholds).5 The Exchange
notes that subcabinet trades should have
been included in this section and
proposes to add it to avoid potential
confusion.
Removal of SPXPM
The Exchange lastly proposes to
eliminate references to ‘‘SPXPM’’ from
the Fees Schedule. Particularly, the
Exchange recently moved P.M.-settled
S&P 500 Index options expiring on the
third-Friday of the month (‘‘thirdFriday’’), previously listed in a separate
class and trading under the symbol
‘‘SPXPM’’, to the SPX class which
includes the weekly SPXW. In
connection with the move, the Exchange
has changed the trading symbol for
these options from ‘‘SPXPM’’ to
‘‘SPXW.’’ As such, the Exchange
proposes to delete from the Fees
Schedule references to SPXPM, as such
references are obsolete.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.6 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 7 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
5 Specifically, the last sentence currently reads:
‘‘For purposes of determining the rebate, the
qualifying volume of all Floor Broker Trading
Permit Holders affiliated with a single TPH
organization will be aggregated, and, if such total
meets or exceeds the customer and/or professional
customer and voluntary professional open-outcry
contracts per day thresholds in all underlying
symbols excluding Underlying Symbol List A
(except RLG, RLV, RUI, AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and
UKXM)(34), DJX, XSP and XSPAM that TPH
organization will receive a single rebate, regardless
of the number of Floor Broker Trading Permits
affiliated with that TPH organization.’’
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
34562
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2017 / Notices
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,8 which
requires that Exchange rules provide for
the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its
Trading Permit Holders and other
persons using its facilities.
The Exchange believes it’s
appropriate to continue to waive the
VIX Index License Surcharge for
Clearing Trading Permit Holder
Proprietary VIX orders that have a
premium of $0.10 or lower and have
series with an expiration of 7 calendar
days or less because the Exchange wants
to continue encouraging Firms to roll
and close over positions close to
expiration at low premium levels.
Particularly, the Exchange believes it’s
reasonable to waive the entire $0.10 per
contract surcharge because without the
waiver of the surcharge, firms are less
likely to engage in these transactions, as
opposed to other VIX transactions, due
to the associated transaction costs. The
Exchange believes it’s equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to limit the
waiver to Clearing Trading Permit
Holder Proprietary orders because they
contribute capital to facilitate the
execution of VIX customer orders with
a premium of $0.10 or lower and series
with an expiration of 7 calendar days or
less. Finally, the Exchange believes it’s
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to provide that the
surcharge will be waived through
December 2017, as it gives the Exchange
additional time to evaluate if the waiver
is continuing to have the desired effect
of encouraging these transactions.
The Exchange believes extending the
waiver of ETH Trading Permit and
Bandwidth Packet fees for one of each
type of Trading Permit and Bandwidth
Packet, per affiliated TPH through
December 2017 is reasonable, equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory, because
the respective fees are being waived in
their entirety, which promotes and
encourages trading during the ETH
session and applies to all ETH TPHs.
The Exchange believes it’s also
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to waive fees for Login
IDs related to waived Trading Permits
and/or Bandwidth Packets because the
respective fees are being waived in their
entirety, which promotes and
encourages ongoing participation in
ETH and applies to all ETH TPHs.
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:30 Jul 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
The Exchange believes it is
appropriate to extend the waiver of all
transaction fees for RLG, RLV, RUI,
AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and UKXM
transactions, including the Floor
Brokerage fee, the License Index
Surcharge and CFLEX Surcharge Fee.
Particularly, it is reasonable because
TPHs will not be assessed fees for these
transactions which promotes and
encourages trading of these products
which are still relatively new. The
Exchange believes the proposed change
is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it applies to all
TPHs.
The Exchange believes that the
compensation plan for DPM(s)
appointed in AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and
UKXM is reasonable because it offsets
the DPM(s)’ ongoing costs. The
Exchange believes it’s equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to extend the
compensation plan to the DPM(s)
appointed in AWDE, FTEM, FXTM or
UKXM because these DPMs have
ongoing DPM costs related to these
products and the Exchange wants to
continue to incentivize the DPMs to
continue to serve as DPMs in these
products.
The Exchange believes extending the
FLEX Asian and Cliquet Flex Trading
Incentive Program is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
believes the amount of the current
incentives provided to FLEX Traders
should encourage the Flex Traders to
trade FLEX Asian and Cliquet options,
which should result in a more robust
price discovery process that will result
in better execution prices for customers.
In addition, the proposed change
applies equally to all FLEX Traders.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed subsidy to the DPM appointed
in RVX is reasonable because it offsets
the DPM’s ongoing DPM costs. The
Exchange notes that the DPM provides
a crucial role in providing quotes and
the opportunity for market participants
to trade RVX, which can lead to
increased volume, thereby providing a
robust market. Additionally, the
Exchange believes the proposed change
is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the DPM in RVX
incurs costs as part of being a DPM.
Moreover, as noted above, a similar
compensation plan is already in place
for DPM(s) of AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and
UKXM. While the amount of the
proposed subsidy for RVX is larger than
the amount provided to the DPM(s) of
AWDE, FTEM, FXTM, UKXM, the
Exchange notes that it is more difficult
to quote a volatility index, as opposed
to a cash index. Additionally, the
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange notes that there is currently
more volume in RVX than the products
mentioned above and as such, the
Exchange wishes to ensure the DPM
continues to provide liquid and active
markets in the product to encourage its
continued growth.
The Exchange believes that permitting
Professional Customer, Broker-Dealer
and JBO orders to count towards the
qualifying volume thresholds for VIP is
reasonable because it will allow TPHs to
more easily reach qualifying volume
thresholds (and thereby receive more
credits). The Exchange believes the
proposed change is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it
applies to TPHs equally. The Exchange
also notes that, while only certain
orders would count towards the
qualifying thresholds, Professional
Customers, Broker-Dealers and JBOs are
similar to Customers in that these
market participants’ orders are primarily
executed by an agent and VIP is an
incentive program for agency trading.
Additionally, an increase in Customer,
Professional Customer, Broker-Dealer
and JBO order flow would bring greater
volume and liquidity, which benefits all
market participants by providing more
trading opportunities and tighter
spreads. Indeed, the Exchange notes that
incentive programs based on aggregate
volume of certain market participants
already exist elsewhere within the
industry.9 Additionally, the Exchange
believes it’s reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory to only
apply credits to Customer orders (i.e.,
‘‘C’’ origin code) because Customer
order flow enhances liquidity on the
Exchange for the benefit of all market
participants. Specifically, Customer
volume is important because it
continues to attract liquidity to the
Exchange, which benefits all market
participants by providing more trading
opportunities, which attracts MarketMakers. An increase in the activity of
these market participants in turn
facilitates tighter spreads, which may
cause an additional corresponding
increase in order flow from other market
participants. Moreover, the options
industry has a long history of providing
preferential pricing to Customers.
Lastly, while the proposed rule change
may affect the Affiliate Volume Plan
(‘‘AVP’’), the Exchange believes the
proposed change is still appropriate for
the reasons set forth in filings related to
AVP.10
9 See e.g., NASDAQ Stock Market Rules, Chapter
XV, Options Pricings, Sec. 2 Options Market—Fees
and Rebates, Tiers 1–5 and Tier 8.
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76923
(January 15, 2016), 81 FR 3841 (January 22, 2016)
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2017 / Notices
Lastly, the Exchange believes (i)
eliminating references to SPXPM in the
Fees Schedule and (ii) correcting an
inadvertent failure to include a
reference to ‘‘subcabinet’’ trades in
Footnote 25 will help to avoid
confusion, thereby removing
impediments to and perfecting the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that
no substantive changes are being made
by these particular proposed rule
changes.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule changes will impose
any burden on competition that are not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on intramarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because, while different fees and rebates
are assessed to different market
participants in some circumstances,
these different market participants have
different obligations and different
circumstances as discussed above. For
example, Clearing TPHs have clearing
obligations that other market
participants do not have and DPMs have
quoting obligations that other market
participants do not have. There is also
a history in the options markets of
providing preferential treatment to
customers. Further, the proposed
changes, are intended to encourage
market participants to bring increased
volume to the Exchange (which benefits
all market participants), while still
covering Exchange costs (including
those associated with the upgrading and
maintenance of Exchange systems). The
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on intermarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because the proposed change only
affects trading on CBOE. To the extent
that the proposed change makes CBOE
a more attractive marketplace for market
participants at other exchanges, such
market participants are welcome to
become CBOE market participants.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 11 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 12 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2017–055 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2017–055. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
(SR–CBOE–2016–002) and Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 77926 (May 26, 2016), 81 FR 35421
(June 2, 2016) (SR–CBOE–2016–045).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:30 Jul 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
11 15
12 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2017–055, and should be submitted on
or before August 15, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–15529 Filed 7–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that
the Securities and Exchange
Commission will hold a closed meeting
on Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 2 p.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the closed meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters also may be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10)
and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(7),
(a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit
consideration of the scheduled matters
at the closed meeting.
Commissioner Piwowar, as duty
officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the closed meeting in closed
session.
The subject matters of the closed
meeting will be:
Institution and settlement of
injunctive actions;
13 17
Sfmt 4703
34563
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
25JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34560-34563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15529]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-81170; File No. SR-CBOE-2017-055]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to Updates for the CBOE Fees Schedule
July 19, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 11, 2017, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to make a number of changes to its Fees
Schedule, effective immediately.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to make a number of changes to its Fees
Schedule.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee change on June
29, 2017 (SR-CBOE-2017-053). On July 11, 2017, the Exchange withdrew
that filing and submitted this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VIX License Index Surcharge Waiver
The Exchange proposes to extend the current waiver of the VIX Index
License Surcharge of $0.10 per contract for Clearing Trading Permit
Holder Proprietary (``Firm'') (origin codes ``F'' or ``L'') VIX orders
that have a premium of $0.10 or lower and have series with an
expiration of seven (7) calendar days or less. The Exchange adopted the
current waiver to reduce transaction costs on expiring, low-priced VIX
options, which the Exchange believed would encourage Firms to seek to
close and/or roll over such positions close to expiration at low
premium levels, including facilitating customers to do so, in order to
free up capital and encourage additional trading. The Exchange had
proposed to waive the surcharge through June 30, 2017. The Exchange
proposes to extend the waiver of the surcharge through December 31,
2017, at which time the Exchange will reevaluate whether the waiver has
continued to prompt Firms to close and roll over positions close to
expiration at low premium levels.
Extended Trading Hour Fees Waiver
In order to promote and encourage trading during the Extended
Trading Hours (``ETH'') session, the Exchange currently waives ETH
Trading Permit and Bandwidth Packet fees for one (1) of each initial
Trading Permits and one (1) of each initial Bandwidth Packet, per
affiliated TPH. The Exchange notes that waiver is set to expire June
30, 2017. The Exchange also waives fees through June 30, 2017 for a CMI
and FIX login ID if the CMI and/or FIX login ID is related to a waived
ETH Trading Permit and/or waived Bandwidth packet. In order to continue
to promote trading during ETH, the Exchange wishes to extend these
waivers through December 31, 2017.
RLG, RLV, RUI, AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and UKXM Transaction Fees Waiver
The Exchange was recently authorized to list options on seven FTSE
Russell Indexes (i.e., Russell 1000 Growth Index (``RLG''), Russell
1000
[[Page 34561]]
Value Index (``RLV''), Russell 1000 Index (``RUI''), FTSE Developed
Europe Index (``AWDE''), FTSE Emerging Markets Index (``FTEM''), China
50 Index ``(FXTM'') and FTSE 100 Index (``UKXM'')). In order to promote
and encourage trading of these products, the Exchange currently waives
all transaction fees (including the Floor Brokerage Fee, Index License
Surcharge and CFLEX Surcharge Fee) for each of these products. This
waiver however is set to expire June 30, 2017. In order to continue to
promote trading of these options classes, the Exchange proposes to
extend the fee waiver of through December 31, 2017.
AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and UKXM DPM Payment Extension
The Exchange currently offers a compensation plan to the Designated
Primary Market-Maker(s) (``DPM(s)'') appointed in AWDE, FTEM, FXTM or
UKXM to offset the initial DPM costs. Specifically, the Fees Schedule
provides that DPM(s) appointed for an entire month in these classes
will receive a payment of $7,500 per class per month through June 30,
2017. The Exchange notes that DPMs appointed in these products still
have ongoing costs, which the Exchange desires to continue to help
offset. As such, the Exchange proposes to extend the DPM payment plan
through December 31, 2017.
FLEX Asian and Cliquet Flex Trader Incentive Program Extension
By way of background, a FLEX Trader is entitled to a pro-rata share
of the monthly compensation pool based on the customer order fees
collected from customer orders traded against that FLEX Trader's orders
with origin codes other than ``C'' in FLEX Broad-Based Index Options
with Asian or Cliquet style settlement (``Exotics'') each month
(``Incentive Program''). The Fees Schedule provides that the Incentive
Program is set to expire either by June 30, 2017 or until total average
daily volume in Exotics exceeds 15,000 contracts for three consecutive
months, whichever comes first. The Exchange notes that total average
daily volume in Exotics has not yet exceeded 15,000 contracts for three
consecutive months. In order to continue to incentivize FLEX Traders to
provide liquidity in FLEX Asian and Cliquet options, the Exchange
proposes to extend the program to December 31, 2017 or until total
average daily volume in Exotics exceeds 15,000 contracts for three
consecutive months, whichever comes first.
RVX DPM Payment
The Exchange proposes to offer a compensation plan for the DPM
appointed in CBOE Russell 2000 Volatility Index (``RVX'') to offset
associated DPM costs, similar to the compensation plan offered to
DPM(s) appointed in AWDE, FTEM, FXTM or UKXM. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to provide that the DPM appointed for an entire month
in RVX will receive a payment of $8,500 through December 31, 2017. The
Exchange notes that a DPM appointed in this product has ongoing costs,
which the Exchange desires to continue to help offset so that the DPM
may continue to meet its obligations.
Volume Incentive Program
The Exchange also proposes to amend its Volume Incentive Program
(``VIP''). By way of background, under VIP, the Exchange credits each
Trading Permit Holder (``TPH'') the per contract amount set forth in
the VIP table resulting from each public customer (``C'' origin code)
order transmitted by that TPH (with certain exceptions) which is
executed electronically on the Exchange, provided the TPH meets certain
volume thresholds in a month.\4\ The Exchange proposes to provide that
Professional Customers and Voluntary Professionals (``Professional
Customers'') (origin code ``W''), Broker-Dealers (origin code ``B'')
and Joint Back-Offices (``JBO'') (origin code ``J'') orders would also
count towards the qualifying volume thresholds. The Exchange believes
the inclusion of Professional Customer, Broker-Dealer and JBO orders in
the qualifying thresholds will encourage TPHs to execute more
Professional Customer, Broker-Dealer and JBO orders. The Exchange notes
however, that while these orders would now count towards the qualifying
volume thresholds, the Exchange would not pay credits to the executing
TPH for these orders (i.e., only Customer orders (origin code ``C'')
would continue to receive the credits under the program).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See CBOE Fees Schedule, Volume Incentive Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote 25 Clarification
The Exchange proposes to clarify an inadvertent omission in
Footnote 25 of the Fees Schedule. By way of background, Footnote 25,
which governs rebates on Floor Broker Trading Permits, currently
provides that any Floor Broker that executes a certain average of
customer open-outcry contracts per day over the course of a calendar
month in all underlying symbols excluding Underlying Symbol List A
(except RLG, RLV, RUI, AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and UKXM), DJX, XSP, XSPAM and
subcabinet trades (``Qualifying Symbols''), will receive a rebate on
that TPH's Floor Broker Trading Permit fees. The Exchange notes that it
inadvertently failed to include a reference to ``subcabinet trades'' in
the last sentence of the footnote (i.e., when referencing which options
are excluded from the qualifying thresholds).\5\ The Exchange notes
that subcabinet trades should have been included in this section and
proposes to add it to avoid potential confusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Specifically, the last sentence currently reads: ``For
purposes of determining the rebate, the qualifying volume of all
Floor Broker Trading Permit Holders affiliated with a single TPH
organization will be aggregated, and, if such total meets or exceeds
the customer and/or professional customer and voluntary professional
open-outcry contracts per day thresholds in all underlying symbols
excluding Underlying Symbol List A (except RLG, RLV, RUI, AWDE,
FTEM, FXTM and UKXM)(34), DJX, XSP and XSPAM that TPH organization
will receive a single rebate, regardless of the number of Floor
Broker Trading Permits affiliated with that TPH organization.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Removal of SPXPM
The Exchange lastly proposes to eliminate references to ``SPXPM''
from the Fees Schedule. Particularly, the Exchange recently moved P.M.-
settled S&P 500 Index options expiring on the third-Friday of the month
(``third-Friday''), previously listed in a separate class and trading
under the symbol ``SPXPM'', to the SPX class which includes the weekly
SPXW. In connection with the move, the Exchange has changed the trading
symbol for these options from ``SPXPM'' to ``SPXW.'' As such, the
Exchange proposes to delete from the Fees Schedule references to SPXPM,
as such references are obsolete.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\6\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \7\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to
[[Page 34562]]
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ which requires that
Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other
persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes it's appropriate to continue to waive the VIX
Index License Surcharge for Clearing Trading Permit Holder Proprietary
VIX orders that have a premium of $0.10 or lower and have series with
an expiration of 7 calendar days or less because the Exchange wants to
continue encouraging Firms to roll and close over positions close to
expiration at low premium levels. Particularly, the Exchange believes
it's reasonable to waive the entire $0.10 per contract surcharge
because without the waiver of the surcharge, firms are less likely to
engage in these transactions, as opposed to other VIX transactions, due
to the associated transaction costs. The Exchange believes it's
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to limit the waiver to
Clearing Trading Permit Holder Proprietary orders because they
contribute capital to facilitate the execution of VIX customer orders
with a premium of $0.10 or lower and series with an expiration of 7
calendar days or less. Finally, the Exchange believes it's reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to provide that the surcharge
will be waived through December 2017, as it gives the Exchange
additional time to evaluate if the waiver is continuing to have the
desired effect of encouraging these transactions.
The Exchange believes extending the waiver of ETH Trading Permit
and Bandwidth Packet fees for one of each type of Trading Permit and
Bandwidth Packet, per affiliated TPH through December 2017 is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory, because the
respective fees are being waived in their entirety, which promotes and
encourages trading during the ETH session and applies to all ETH TPHs.
The Exchange believes it's also reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to waive fees for Login IDs related to waived Trading
Permits and/or Bandwidth Packets because the respective fees are being
waived in their entirety, which promotes and encourages ongoing
participation in ETH and applies to all ETH TPHs.
The Exchange believes it is appropriate to extend the waiver of all
transaction fees for RLG, RLV, RUI, AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and UKXM
transactions, including the Floor Brokerage fee, the License Index
Surcharge and CFLEX Surcharge Fee. Particularly, it is reasonable
because TPHs will not be assessed fees for these transactions which
promotes and encourages trading of these products which are still
relatively new. The Exchange believes the proposed change is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because it applies to all TPHs.
The Exchange believes that the compensation plan for DPM(s)
appointed in AWDE, FTEM, FXTM and UKXM is reasonable because it offsets
the DPM(s)' ongoing costs. The Exchange believes it's equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to extend the compensation plan to the DPM(s)
appointed in AWDE, FTEM, FXTM or UKXM because these DPMs have ongoing
DPM costs related to these products and the Exchange wants to continue
to incentivize the DPMs to continue to serve as DPMs in these products.
The Exchange believes extending the FLEX Asian and Cliquet Flex
Trading Incentive Program is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange believes the amount of the current
incentives provided to FLEX Traders should encourage the Flex Traders
to trade FLEX Asian and Cliquet options, which should result in a more
robust price discovery process that will result in better execution
prices for customers. In addition, the proposed change applies equally
to all FLEX Traders.
The Exchange believes that the proposed subsidy to the DPM
appointed in RVX is reasonable because it offsets the DPM's ongoing DPM
costs. The Exchange notes that the DPM provides a crucial role in
providing quotes and the opportunity for market participants to trade
RVX, which can lead to increased volume, thereby providing a robust
market. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed change is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the DPM in RVX incurs
costs as part of being a DPM. Moreover, as noted above, a similar
compensation plan is already in place for DPM(s) of AWDE, FTEM, FXTM
and UKXM. While the amount of the proposed subsidy for RVX is larger
than the amount provided to the DPM(s) of AWDE, FTEM, FXTM, UKXM, the
Exchange notes that it is more difficult to quote a volatility index,
as opposed to a cash index. Additionally, the Exchange notes that there
is currently more volume in RVX than the products mentioned above and
as such, the Exchange wishes to ensure the DPM continues to provide
liquid and active markets in the product to encourage its continued
growth.
The Exchange believes that permitting Professional Customer,
Broker-Dealer and JBO orders to count towards the qualifying volume
thresholds for VIP is reasonable because it will allow TPHs to more
easily reach qualifying volume thresholds (and thereby receive more
credits). The Exchange believes the proposed change is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because it applies to TPHs equally. The
Exchange also notes that, while only certain orders would count towards
the qualifying thresholds, Professional Customers, Broker-Dealers and
JBOs are similar to Customers in that these market participants' orders
are primarily executed by an agent and VIP is an incentive program for
agency trading. Additionally, an increase in Customer, Professional
Customer, Broker-Dealer and JBO order flow would bring greater volume
and liquidity, which benefits all market participants by providing more
trading opportunities and tighter spreads. Indeed, the Exchange notes
that incentive programs based on aggregate volume of certain market
participants already exist elsewhere within the industry.\9\
Additionally, the Exchange believes it's reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to only apply credits to Customer orders (i.e.,
``C'' origin code) because Customer order flow enhances liquidity on
the Exchange for the benefit of all market participants. Specifically,
Customer volume is important because it continues to attract liquidity
to the Exchange, which benefits all market participants by providing
more trading opportunities, which attracts Market-Makers. An increase
in the activity of these market participants in turn facilitates
tighter spreads, which may cause an additional corresponding increase
in order flow from other market participants. Moreover, the options
industry has a long history of providing preferential pricing to
Customers. Lastly, while the proposed rule change may affect the
Affiliate Volume Plan (``AVP''), the Exchange believes the proposed
change is still appropriate for the reasons set forth in filings
related to AVP.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See e.g., NASDAQ Stock Market Rules, Chapter XV, Options
Pricings, Sec. 2 Options Market--Fees and Rebates, Tiers 1-5 and
Tier 8.
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76923 (January 15,
2016), 81 FR 3841 (January 22, 2016) (SR-CBOE-2016-002) and
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77926 (May 26, 2016), 81 FR
35421 (June 2, 2016) (SR-CBOE-2016-045).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 34563]]
Lastly, the Exchange believes (i) eliminating references to SPXPM
in the Fees Schedule and (ii) correcting an inadvertent failure to
include a reference to ``subcabinet'' trades in Footnote 25 will help
to avoid confusion, thereby removing impediments to and perfecting the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that no substantive changes are being
made by these particular proposed rule changes.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burden on competition that are not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because, while different fees
and rebates are assessed to different market participants in some
circumstances, these different market participants have different
obligations and different circumstances as discussed above. For
example, Clearing TPHs have clearing obligations that other market
participants do not have and DPMs have quoting obligations that other
market participants do not have. There is also a history in the options
markets of providing preferential treatment to customers. Further, the
proposed changes, are intended to encourage market participants to
bring increased volume to the Exchange (which benefits all market
participants), while still covering Exchange costs (including those
associated with the upgrading and maintenance of Exchange systems). The
Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed change
only affects trading on CBOE. To the extent that the proposed change
makes CBOE a more attractive marketplace for market participants at
other exchanges, such market participants are welcome to become CBOE
market participants.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \12\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2017-055 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2017-055. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2017-055,
and should be submitted on or before August 15, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-15529 Filed 7-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P