Mack Trucks, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 33546-33547 [2017-15254]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
33546
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 138 / Thursday, July 20, 2017 / Notices
31315, the following 8 individuals have
satisfied the renewal conditions for
obtaining an exemption from the rule
prohibiting drivers with ITDM from
driving CMVs in interstate commerce
(76 FR 17478; 76 FR 27376):
Peter N. Amendola (MA)
Steven V. Callison (LA)
Douglas A. Carroll (IN)
Tamara D. Folsom (SD)
Ernest Martinelli, III (RI)
Johnathon C. Morgan (TN)
David R. Smith (ME)
Adam J. Stegenga (MI)
The drivers were included in docket
No. FMCSA–2011–0040. Their
exemptions are applicable as of May 11,
2017, and will expire on May 11, 2019.
As of May 18, 2017, and in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315, Thomas G. Deke (MO) has
satisfied the renewal conditions for
obtaining an exemption from the rule
prohibiting drivers with ITDM from
driving CMVs in interstate commerce.
(71 FR 17558; 71 FR 28913).
This driver was included in docket
No. FMCSA–2006–24016. The
exemption is applicable as of May 18,
2017, and will expire on May 18, 2019.
As of May 22, 2017, and in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315, the following 17 individuals
have satisfied the renewal conditions for
obtaining an exemption from the rule
prohibiting drivers with ITDM from
driving CMVs in interstate commerce
(74 FR 15578; 74 FR 24072):
William C. Arrington (MD)
Raymond Barajas (KS)
William N. Carpenter (KY)
Darin L. Carpenter (MT)
Jeffery W. Cotner (OR)
Juan A. Hartwell (CT)
David A. Holzbach (SC)
Joseph T. Jackson (CT)
Donald A. Lambrecht (NC)
William M. Liebert (NV)
Curtis J. Panther (MN)
Eric S. Ritter (CA)
Gary L. Robinson (TN)
Kevin J. Sears (IL)
Peter A. Storm (LA)
Don A. Wisnosky (WI)
Patrick D. Yosten (NE)
The drivers were included in docket
No. FMCSA–2009–0067. Their
exemptions are applicable as of May 22,
2017, and will expire on May 22, 2019.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315,
each exemption will be valid for two
years from the applicable date unless
revoked earlier by FMCSA. The
exemption will be revoked if the
following occurs: (1) The person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
was maintained prior to being granted;
or (3) continuation of the exemption
would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and
31315.
Issued on: June 8, 2017.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–14917 Filed 7–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2017–0016; Notice 1]
Mack Trucks, Inc., Receipt of Petition
for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Mack Trucks, Inc. (MTI), has
determined that certain model year
(MY) 2017 Mack heavy duty trucks do
not fully comply with Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
120, Tire selection and rims and motor
home/recreation vehicle trailer load
carrying capacity information for motor
vehicles with a GVWR of more than
4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds). MTI
filed a noncompliance information
report dated February 9, 2017. MTI also
petitioned NHTSA on February 28,
2017, and revised its petition on April
29, 2017, for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is August 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited in the title of this
notice and submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver comments
by hand to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Comments may also be faxed to
(202) 493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that comments you have
submitted by mail were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
All comments and supporting
materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated
above will be filed in the docket and
will be considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the fullest extent
possible.
When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will also
be published in the Federal Register
pursuant to the authority indicated at
the end of this notice.
All comments, background
documentation, and supporting
materials submitted to the docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number for this
petition is shown in the heading of this
notice.
DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Mack Trucks, Inc. (MTI),
has determined that certain model year
(MY) 2017 Mack heavy duty trucks do
not fully comply with paragraph S5.2(b)
of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 120, Tire
selection and rims and motor home/
recreation vehicle trailer load carrying
capacity information for motor vehicles
with a GVWR of more than 4,536
kilograms (10,000 pounds). MTI filed a
noncompliance report dated February 9,
2017, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 138 / Thursday, July 20, 2017 / Notices
Responsibility and Reports. MTI also
petitioned NHTSA on February 28,
2017, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d)
and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, and
revised its petition on April 29, 2017, to
obtain an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of
49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that
this noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of MTI’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately
226 MY 2017 Mack Pinnacle, Granite,
TerraPro and LR heavy duty trucks,
manufactured between August 15, 2016,
and December 12, 2016, are potentially
involved.
III. Noncompliance: MTI explains that
the noncompliance is that the wheels on
the subject vehicles incorrectly identify
the rim size as 24.5″ x 8.25″ instead of
22.5″ x 8.25″, and therefore do not meet
the requirements of paragraph S5.2(b) of
FMVSS No. 120. Specifically, the
marking error overstates the wheel
diameter by 2″.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5.2 of
FMVSS No. 120 states:
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
S5.2 Rim marking. Each rim or, at the
option of the manufacturer in the case of a
single-piece wheel, wheel disc shall be
marked with the information listed in
paragraphs (a) through (e) of this paragraph,
in lettering not less than 3 millimeters high,
impressed to a depth or, at the option of the
manufacturer, embossed to a height of not
less than 0.125 millimeters. . .
(b) The rim size designation, and in case
of multipiece rims, the rim type designation.
For example: 20 x 5.50, or 20 x 5.5.
V. Summary of MTI’s Petition: MTI
described the subject noncompliance
and stated its belief that the
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, MTI
referenced a letter to NHTSA, dated
December 5, 2016, from Arconic Wheel
and Transportation Products (Arconic),
which is the rim manufacturer, and
provided the following:
1. A 24.5″ tire will not seat on the rim;
therefore, if someone tries to mount a
24.5″ tire to the rim, it will not hold air
and therefore cannot be inflated.
2. When tires are replaced, the
technician will select the tire based on
the size and rating of the tire being
replaced. When Mack manufactured the
vehicle, the tire used was a 22.5″ (i.e.,
the correct size for the rim). Therefore,
the tires installed by Mack have the
correct size on the sidewall of the tire.
3. Mack is required to list the tires
size and inflation pressures on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
certification label as required by 49 CFR
567. The information printed on the
label is the correct size, a 22.5″ tire and
reflects the tires that were installed
when manufactured. The certification
label is located inside the driver’s door
and can be easily accessed by the tire
installer.
MTI concluded by expressing the
belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
To view MTI’s petition analyses in its
entirety you can visit https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets and by using the docket ID
number for this petition shown in the
heading of this notice.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject vehicles that MTI no longer
controlled at the time it determined that
the noncompliance existed. However,
any decision on this petition does not
relieve vehicle distributors and dealers
of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after MTI notified them that the
subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–15254 Filed 7–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33547
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0109; Notice 2]
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Grant of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
AGENCY:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
(MBUSA), has determined that certain
model year (MY) 2015–2016 MercedesBenz CLS-Class motor vehicles do not
fully comply with Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
110, Tire Selection and Rims and Motor
Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load
Carrying Capacity Information for Motor
Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536
kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less.
MBUSA filed a Safety Recall Report
dated September 12, 2016. MBUSA also
petitioned NHTSA on October 4, 2016,
for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
ADDRESSES: For further information on
this decision contact Kerrin Bressant,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366–1110, facsimile (202) 366–
5930.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA),
has determined that certain model year
(MY) 2015–2016 Mercedes-Benz CLSClass motor vehicles do not fully
comply with paragraph S4.3(a) of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 110, Tire Selection and
Rims and Motor Home/Recreation
Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity
Information for Motor Vehicles with a
GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000
pounds) or Less. MBUSA filed a report
dated September 12, 2016, pursuant to
49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports. MBUSA also petitioned
NHTSA on October 4, 2016, pursuant to
49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49
CFR part 556, for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of
49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that
this noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was
published, with a 30-day public
comment period on December 20, 2016,
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 138 (Thursday, July 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33546-33547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15254]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2017-0016; Notice 1]
Mack Trucks, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Mack Trucks, Inc. (MTI), has determined that certain model
year (MY) 2017 Mack heavy duty trucks do not fully comply with Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 120, Tire selection and rims
and motor home/recreation vehicle trailer load carrying capacity
information for motor vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kilograms
(10,000 pounds). MTI filed a noncompliance information report dated
February 9, 2017. MTI also petitioned NHTSA on February 28, 2017, and
revised its petition on April 29, 2017, for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is August 21,
2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Mack Trucks, Inc. (MTI), has determined that certain
model year (MY) 2017 Mack heavy duty trucks do not fully comply with
paragraph S5.2(b) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
120, Tire selection and rims and motor home/recreation vehicle trailer
load carrying capacity information for motor vehicles with a GVWR of
more than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds). MTI filed a noncompliance
report dated February 9, 2017, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance
[[Page 33547]]
Responsibility and Reports. MTI also petitioned NHTSA on February 28,
2017, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556,
and revised its petition on April 29, 2017, to obtain an exemption from
the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on
the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of MTI's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 226 MY 2017 Mack Pinnacle,
Granite, TerraPro and LR heavy duty trucks, manufactured between August
15, 2016, and December 12, 2016, are potentially involved.
III. Noncompliance: MTI explains that the noncompliance is that the
wheels on the subject vehicles incorrectly identify the rim size as
24.5'' x 8.25'' instead of 22.5'' x 8.25'', and therefore do not meet
the requirements of paragraph S5.2(b) of FMVSS No. 120. Specifically,
the marking error overstates the wheel diameter by 2''.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5.2 of FMVSS No. 120 states:
S5.2 Rim marking. Each rim or, at the option of the manufacturer
in the case of a single-piece wheel, wheel disc shall be marked with
the information listed in paragraphs (a) through (e) of this
paragraph, in lettering not less than 3 millimeters high, impressed
to a depth or, at the option of the manufacturer, embossed to a
height of not less than 0.125 millimeters. . .
(b) The rim size designation, and in case of multipiece rims,
the rim type designation. For example: 20 x 5.50, or 20 x 5.5.
V. Summary of MTI's Petition: MTI described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, MTI referenced a letter to NHTSA, dated
December 5, 2016, from Arconic Wheel and Transportation Products
(Arconic), which is the rim manufacturer, and provided the following:
1. A 24.5'' tire will not seat on the rim; therefore, if someone
tries to mount a 24.5'' tire to the rim, it will not hold air and
therefore cannot be inflated.
2. When tires are replaced, the technician will select the tire
based on the size and rating of the tire being replaced. When Mack
manufactured the vehicle, the tire used was a 22.5'' (i.e., the correct
size for the rim). Therefore, the tires installed by Mack have the
correct size on the sidewall of the tire.
3. Mack is required to list the tires size and inflation pressures
on the certification label as required by 49 CFR 567. The information
printed on the label is the correct size, a 22.5'' tire and reflects
the tires that were installed when manufactured. The certification
label is located inside the driver's door and can be easily accessed by
the tire installer.
MTI concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
To view MTI's petition analyses in its entirety you can visit
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets and by using the docket ID number for this
petition shown in the heading of this notice.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that MTI no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after MTI
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-15254 Filed 7-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P