Volvo Trucks North America, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 33549-33550 [2017-15253]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 138 / Thursday, July 20, 2017 / Notices
increase of 105 kg. The label on the CLS
400 4MATIC model vehicle specifies a
355 kg VCW which should have been
325 kg, an increase of 30 kg. These
errors could cause a consumer to load
the subject vehicles beyond their
original design specifications.
In its’ petition, MBUSA provided an
analysis indicating the mounted tires on
the subject vehicles are sufficient for
carrying the maximum vehicle loads
derived from the higher, incorrect, VCW
values. For the CLS 400 vehicles the
analysis indicates the tire load carrying
capabilities exceed the maximum tire
load by at least 147 kg (710 kg tire load
rating minus 563 kg maximum tire
load). For the CLS 400 4MATIC vehicles
the analysis indicates the tire load
carrying capabilities exceed the
maximum tire load by at least 125 kg
(709 kg tire load rating minus 584 kg
maximum tire load). NHTSA verified
the tire load ratings specified by
MBUSA in accordance with the
European Tyre and Rim Technical
Organisation (ETRTO) manual. As
shown by MBUSA, the tire capacities
are more than adequate to handle the
additional weight of the higher VCW
values. MBUSA’s analysis shows that
the tires mounted on the subject
vehicles exceed the load requirements
of FMVSS No. 110.
MBUSA also mentioned that the
certification labels affixed to the subject
vehicles provide the vehicle’s gross axle
weight ratings (GAWRs) and the gross
vehicle weight rating (GVWR)in
accordance with 49 CFR 567,
Certification. MBUSA stated that the
GAWRs and GVWR values provided on
the subject vehicles are correct as
labeled. These ratings are established by
the vehicle manufacturer and provided
as an alternative source of information
consumers can use to ensure a vehicle
and its’ axles are not overloaded.
Vehicle manufacturers specify that these
ratings should not be exceeded when
loading any vehicle. The agency
reviewed the maximum loads on the
axles and vehicles, using the higher
labeled VCW values, against the
certified GAWRs and GVWR of the
subject vehicles. For the CLS 400
4MATIC vehicles, maximum loads were
well below the GAWR and GVWR
values. For the CLS 400 vehicles, the
maximum loads are essentially at the
certified GAWRs and GVWR values.
MBUSA also stated in its petition that
the platform (chassis and axles) utilized
on the subject vehicles is used with
other CLS vehicle lines and is designed
for vehicles with higher GVWRs. It
appears from this analysis the subject
vehicles can safely accommodate the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
higher VCW loads without overload
concerns.
No comments were received during
the receipt notice comment period.
NHTSA Decision: In consideration of
the foregoing, NHTSA finds that
MBUSA has met its burden of
persuasion that the FMVSS No. 110
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, MBUSA’s petition is
hereby granted and MBUSA is
exempted from the obligation to provide
notification of, and a remedy for, that
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118
and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this
decision only applies to the subject
vehicles that MBUSA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that
the noncompliance existed. However,
the granting of this petition does not
relieve vehicle distributors and dealers
of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after MBUSA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–15255 Filed 7–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2017–0015; Notice 1]
Volvo Trucks North America, Receipt
of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Volvo Trucks North America
(VTNA), has determined that certain
model year (MY) 2017 Volvo VNL and
2017 Volvo VNM heavy duty trucks do
not fully comply with Federal Motor
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33549
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
120, Tire selection and rims and motor
home/recreation vehicle trailer load
carrying capacity information for motor
vehicles with a GVWR of more than
4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds). VTNA
filed a noncompliance information
report dated February 9, 2017. VTNA
also petitioned NHTSA on February 28,
2017, and revised its petition on April
29, 2017, for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is August 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited in the title of this
notice and submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver comments
by hand to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Comments may also be faxed to
(202) 493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that comments you have
submitted by mail were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
All comments and supporting
materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated
above will be filed in the docket and
will be considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the fullest extent
possible.
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
33550
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 138 / Thursday, July 20, 2017 / Notices
When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will also
be published in the Federal Register
pursuant to the authority indicated at
the end of this notice.
All comments, background
documentation, and supporting
materials submitted to the docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number for this
petition is shown in the heading of this
notice.
DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Volvo Trucks North
America (VTNA), has determined that
certain model year (MY) 2017 Volvo
VNL and 2017 Volvo VNM heavy duty
trucks do not fully comply with
paragraph S5.2(b) of Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
120, Tire selection and rims and motor
home/recreation vehicle trailer load
carrying capacity information for motor
vehicles with a GVWR of more than
4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds). VTNA
filed a noncompliance report dated
February 9, 2017, pursuant to 49 CFR
part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports. VTNA also
petitioned NHTSA on February 28,
2017, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d)
and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, and
revised its petition on April 29, 2017, to
obtain an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of
49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that
this noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of VTNA’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately
862 MY 2017 Volvo VNL and 2017
Volvo VNM heavy duty trucks,
manufactured between August 15, 2016,
and November 10, 2016, are potentially
involved.
III. Noncompliance: VTNA explains
that the noncompliance is that the
wheels on the subject vehicles
incorrectly identify the rim size as 24.5″
x 8.25″ instead of 22.5″ x 8.25″, and
therefore do not meet the requirements
of paragraph S5.2(b) of FMVSS No. 120.
Specifically, the marking error
overstates the wheel diameter by 2″.
IV. Rule Text: paragraph S5.2 of
FMVSS No. 120 states:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jul 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
S5.2 Rim marking. Each rim or, at the
option of the manufacturer in the case of a
single-piece wheel, wheel disc shall be
marked with the information listed in
paragraphs (a) through (e) of this paragraph,
in lettering not less than 3 millimeters high,
impressed to a depth or, at the option of the
manufacturer, embossed to a height of not
less than 0.125 millimeters . . .
(b) The rim size designation, and in case
of multipiece rims, the rim type designation.
For example: 20 x 5.50, or 20 x 5.5.
V. Summary of VTNA’s Petition:
VTNA described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, VTNA
referenced a letter to NHTSA, dated
December 5, 2016, from Arconic Wheel
and Transportation Products (Arconic),
which is the rim manufacturer, and
provided the following:
1. A 24.5″ inch tire will not seat on
the rim; therefore, if someone tries to
mount a 24.5″ tire to the rim, it will not
hold air and therefore cannot be
inflated.
2. When tires are replaced, the
technician will select the tire based on
the size and rating of the tire being
replaced. When Volvo manufactured the
vehicle, the tire used was a 22.5″ (i.e.,
the correct size for the rim). Therefore,
the tires installed by Volvo have the
correct size on the sidewall of the tire.
3. Volvo is required to list the tires
size and inflation pressures on the
certification label as required by 49 CFR
567. The information printed on the
label is the correct size, a 22.5″ inch tire
and reflects the tires that were installed
when manufactured. The certification
label is located inside the driver’s door
and can be easily accessed by the tire
installer.
Volvo concluded by expressing the
belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
To view VTNA’s petition analyses in
its entirety you can visit https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets and by using the docket ID
number for this petition shown in the
heading of this notice.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject vehicles that VTNA no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this
petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after VTNA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–15253 Filed 7–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Reports, Forms and Record Keeping
Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collections
and their expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on January 4,
2017.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be submitted on
or before August 21, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance (NEF–230), National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
West Building, 4th Floor, Room W43–
481, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Title: 49 CFR part 566 Manufacturer
Identification.
OMB Number: 2127–0043.
Type of Request: Extension of a
Currently Approved Collection.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 138 (Thursday, July 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33549-33550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15253]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2017-0015; Notice 1]
Volvo Trucks North America, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Volvo Trucks North America (VTNA), has determined that certain
model year (MY) 2017 Volvo VNL and 2017 Volvo VNM heavy duty trucks do
not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
120, Tire selection and rims and motor home/recreation vehicle trailer
load carrying capacity information for motor vehicles with a GVWR of
more than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds). VTNA filed a noncompliance
information report dated February 9, 2017. VTNA also petitioned NHTSA
on February 28, 2017, and revised its petition on April 29, 2017, for a
decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is August 21,
2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
[[Page 33550]]
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Volvo Trucks North America (VTNA), has determined that
certain model year (MY) 2017 Volvo VNL and 2017 Volvo VNM heavy duty
trucks do not fully comply with paragraph S5.2(b) of Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 120, Tire selection and rims and
motor home/recreation vehicle trailer load carrying capacity
information for motor vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kilograms
(10,000 pounds). VTNA filed a noncompliance report dated February 9,
2017, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports. VTNA also petitioned NHTSA on February 28,
2017, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556,
and revised its petition on April 29, 2017, to obtain an exemption from
the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on
the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of VTNA's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 862 MY 2017 Volvo VNL and 2017
Volvo VNM heavy duty trucks, manufactured between August 15, 2016, and
November 10, 2016, are potentially involved.
III. Noncompliance: VTNA explains that the noncompliance is that
the wheels on the subject vehicles incorrectly identify the rim size as
24.5'' x 8.25'' instead of 22.5'' x 8.25'', and therefore do not meet
the requirements of paragraph S5.2(b) of FMVSS No. 120. Specifically,
the marking error overstates the wheel diameter by 2''.
IV. Rule Text: paragraph S5.2 of FMVSS No. 120 states:
S5.2 Rim marking. Each rim or, at the option of the manufacturer
in the case of a single-piece wheel, wheel disc shall be marked with
the information listed in paragraphs (a) through (e) of this
paragraph, in lettering not less than 3 millimeters high, impressed
to a depth or, at the option of the manufacturer, embossed to a
height of not less than 0.125 millimeters . . .
(b) The rim size designation, and in case of multipiece rims,
the rim type designation. For example: 20 x 5.50, or 20 x 5.5.
V. Summary of VTNA's Petition: VTNA described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, VTNA referenced a letter to NHTSA,
dated December 5, 2016, from Arconic Wheel and Transportation Products
(Arconic), which is the rim manufacturer, and provided the following:
1. A 24.5'' inch tire will not seat on the rim; therefore, if
someone tries to mount a 24.5'' tire to the rim, it will not hold air
and therefore cannot be inflated.
2. When tires are replaced, the technician will select the tire
based on the size and rating of the tire being replaced. When Volvo
manufactured the vehicle, the tire used was a 22.5'' (i.e., the correct
size for the rim). Therefore, the tires installed by Volvo have the
correct size on the sidewall of the tire.
3. Volvo is required to list the tires size and inflation pressures
on the certification label as required by 49 CFR 567. The information
printed on the label is the correct size, a 22.5'' inch tire and
reflects the tires that were installed when manufactured. The
certification label is located inside the driver's door and can be
easily accessed by the tire installer.
Volvo concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
To view VTNA's petition analyses in its entirety you can visit
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets and by using the docket ID number for this
petition shown in the heading of this notice.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that VTNA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after VTNA
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-15253 Filed 7-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P