Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements, 32758-32759 [2017-14931]
Download as PDF
32758
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 135 / Monday, July 17, 2017 / Notices
highway travel. In 2010 and 2011,
NHTSA conducted the first large-scale
carefully controlled study in the U.S.
designed to estimate the relative crash
risk associated with drug use by drivers.
Using a case-control design, researchers
collected information from crashinvolved and non-crash involved
drivers in Virginia Beach, Virginia. That
effort focused on acquiring data at crash
sites and resulted in very few seriously
or fatally injured drivers entering the
sample. As such, it was not possible to
assess the relationship between drug use
and serious crashes. Other studies have
examined the prevalence of drugs in
seriously and fatally injured drivers, but
none has used a case-control design
such as the one proposed in the current
study that will allow for an estimation
of risk associated with drug use by
drivers seriously injured or killed in a
motor vehicle crash. Using the casecontrol approach in this manner will
complete the relative risk assessment for
the full range of injury severities using
comparable methodologies.
The large sample of seriously and
fatally injured drivers gathered by this
project using a case-control
methodology will lead to a better
understanding of the relative crash risk
of drug involved driving. The results of
this project will assist NHTSA in
determining how different drug classes
are related to driver safety which will
help the Agency provide guidance to the
States and Federal Government as each
considers policies related to drugged
driving.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 7, 2017.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2017–14916 Filed 7–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2017–0052]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jul 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections. This document describes
the collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 15, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket Number
NHTSA–2017–0052 using any of the
following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Each submission must include the
agency name and the docket number for
this notice. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy J. Sifrit, Contracting Officer’s
Representative, Office of Behavioral
Safety Research (NPD–320), National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W46–466,
Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Sifrit’s
phone number is 202–366–0868, and
her email address is kathy.sifrit@
dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks public
comment on the following proposed
collection of information:
Title: Visual Scanning Training for
Older Drivers.
Type of Request: New information
collection.
OMB Clearance Number: None.
Form Number: NHTSA Forms 1400,
1401 and 1402.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: 3 years from date of approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to collect information from
licensed older drivers to determine (1)
their eligibility to participate in a study
of the effectiveness of a visual scanning
training protocol to improve driving
safety, (2) their attitudes about the
training procedures and their
perceptions of its benefits, and (3) the
driving performance during on-road
evaluations to measure training
effectiveness.
Study participation will be voluntary
and solicited through informational
sessions delivered by a research team
member to residents of a continuing
care retirement community. The
administrator of the host facility will
post notices describing the presentation.
During the presentation, attendees will
be invited to join the research study.
Those who indicate an interest in
participating will be asked their age and
four screening questions to determine
their eligibility for the study. A research
team member will make appointments
to answer any questions participants
may have about the study, to obtain
their signatures on an informed consent
agreement approved by an Institutional
Review Board (IRB), and to check for
color vision and binocular vision
limitations.
Consented study participants will be
randomly assigned within age and
gender categories to either participation
in the visual scanning training program
(four one-on-one training sessions of
one-hour each) or to a control (placebo)
activity for the same amount of time. All
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 135 / Monday, July 17, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
participants will also undergo three onehour on-road evaluations by a Certified
Driver Rehabilitation Specialist (CDRS)
over the course of the study. The CDRS
will provide instructions to the driver
about what route to follow and will
score driving performance using
standard procedures and criteria that are
broadly accepted in the profession.
Following the second and third
evaluations, each study participant will
receive a $100 gift card as compensation
for participation for a total value of $200
per participant.
Audio recordings of the scanning
training sessions will be made, and any
comments about the training offered by
participants will be noted by research
staff during review of the recordings.
After completing visual scanning
training, participants will complete a
brief questionnaire to determine
whether they believe the training will
help them to be a safer driver, whether
they would recommend the training to
friends or relatives, and what they
would pay for such training.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information—NHTSA was established
to reduce the number of deaths, injuries,
and economic losses resulting from
motor vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. As part of this statutory
mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the
development of traffic safety programs.
Older adults comprise an increasing
proportion of the licensed population,
and exposure-based analyses of crash
risk have consistently shown increased
rates of involvement for drivers as they
age into their 70’s and beyond. Further,
these crash risk studies have identified
particular situations where older drivers
are most at risk. These situations often
require significant visual search and
attention, such as maneuvers at
intersections and in merging situations.
As the effect of this age-related
decline in visual search and attention
on safe driving abilities has become
better understood, researchers have
developed different strategies and
techniques to ameliorate it. The visual
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jul 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
scanning training protocol that is the
focus of this study was designed to be
delivered by a generalist occupational
therapist (OT). The OT would conduct
the one-on-one sessions in a clinical
setting, targeting visual field expansion,
simultaneous processing of multiple
visual stimuli, and ocular skill (visual
search routine) exercises. NHTSA’s
study ‘‘Validation of Rehabilitation
Training Programs for Older Drivers’’
(DOT HS 811 749; April 2013) provided
a preliminary analysis of the training’s
effectiveness. While these results were
encouraging, the research team
concluded that widespread promotion
of this intervention would require
additional evidence.
Following efforts to refine and
streamline the training protocol, a larger
sample of healthy older drivers will
receive the updated training program.
The study will measure effectiveness of
the training by comparison of CDRS
road test scores to a control group while
also gauging drivers’ attitudes and
perceptions about the training
experience. The original training
program developer and supporting
research team will direct and perform
this study.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information)—Responds
will be residents of a continuing care
retirement community. Residents
interested in participating will be
excluded if they have been advised to
alter or restrict driving by a physician/
health care professional; if they require
use of any adaptive vehicle controls
(e.g., hand controls or left foot
accelerator); if they have color vision
problems; or if they do not hold a valid
driver’s license. We anticipate screening
135 residents to recruit 90 older drivers
for the study with 60 between the ages
of 70 and 79 and 30 ages 80 or older.
A roughly equal distribution of males
and females will be sought within each
age cohort. Overall, 45 older drivers will
be randomly assigned to the treatment
group (visual scanning training
protocol) and 45 to the control (placebo)
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
32759
group (internet search strategies for
locating information and resources to
improve driving safety).
The screening of the estimated 135
respondents will occur once. The
response to informed consent and check
for vision limitations for the 90
participants occurs just once, but the
study requires participation in the
subsequent four training sessions and
three on-road driving evaluations. The
45 participants who received the
training will complete a brief one-time
questionnaire about attitudes and beliefs
about the training program administered
at the end of the training protocol.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of
Information—The total estimated
burden for this information collection is
689 hours and 15 minutes. The
estimated 135 post-presentation sign-up
interactions to learn the age of
interested candidates and ask the
questions about exclusion criteria will
average 3 minutes in length for an
estimated total burden of 6 hours and 45
minutes. All of the 90 participants will
attend a 30-minute meeting to obtain
informed consent and check for color
and binocular vision limitations, four
one-hour training sessions, and three
one-hour on-road evaluations for an
estimated total burden of 675 hours. The
45 treatment group participants also
will be asked to complete a ten-minute
questionnaire to collect attitudes and
beliefs about the visual scanning
training protocol for a total estimated
burden of 7 hours and 30 minutes.
Participants will incur no costs from the
data collection, and participants will
incur no record keeping burden and no
record keeping cost from the
information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).
Issued in Washington, DC on July 7, 2017.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2017–14931 Filed 7–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 135 (Monday, July 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32758-32759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14931]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2017-0052]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections. This
document describes the collection of information for which NHTSA
intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 15, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket Number
NHTSA-2017-0052 using any of the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Each submission must include the agency name and the docket number
for this notice. Note that all comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy J. Sifrit, Contracting Officer's
Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety Research (NPD-320),
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., W46-466, Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Sifrit's phone number is 202-
366-0868, and her email address is kathy.sifrit@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on
the following proposed collection of information:
Title: Visual Scanning Training for Older Drivers.
Type of Request: New information collection.
OMB Clearance Number: None.
Form Number: NHTSA Forms 1400, 1401 and 1402.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to collect information
from licensed older drivers to determine (1) their eligibility to
participate in a study of the effectiveness of a visual scanning
training protocol to improve driving safety, (2) their attitudes about
the training procedures and their perceptions of its benefits, and (3)
the driving performance during on-road evaluations to measure training
effectiveness.
Study participation will be voluntary and solicited through
informational sessions delivered by a research team member to residents
of a continuing care retirement community. The administrator of the
host facility will post notices describing the presentation. During the
presentation, attendees will be invited to join the research study.
Those who indicate an interest in participating will be asked their age
and four screening questions to determine their eligibility for the
study. A research team member will make appointments to answer any
questions participants may have about the study, to obtain their
signatures on an informed consent agreement approved by an
Institutional Review Board (IRB), and to check for color vision and
binocular vision limitations.
Consented study participants will be randomly assigned within age
and gender categories to either participation in the visual scanning
training program (four one-on-one training sessions of one-hour each)
or to a control (placebo) activity for the same amount of time. All
[[Page 32759]]
participants will also undergo three one-hour on-road evaluations by a
Certified Driver Rehabilitation Specialist (CDRS) over the course of
the study. The CDRS will provide instructions to the driver about what
route to follow and will score driving performance using standard
procedures and criteria that are broadly accepted in the profession.
Following the second and third evaluations, each study participant will
receive a $100 gift card as compensation for participation for a total
value of $200 per participant.
Audio recordings of the scanning training sessions will be made,
and any comments about the training offered by participants will be
noted by research staff during review of the recordings. After
completing visual scanning training, participants will complete a brief
questionnaire to determine whether they believe the training will help
them to be a safer driver, whether they would recommend the training to
friends or relatives, and what they would pay for such training.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information--NHTSA was established to reduce the number of deaths,
injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle crashes on
the Nation's highways. As part of this statutory mandate, NHTSA is
authorized to conduct research as a foundation for the development of
traffic safety programs.
Older adults comprise an increasing proportion of the licensed
population, and exposure-based analyses of crash risk have consistently
shown increased rates of involvement for drivers as they age into their
70's and beyond. Further, these crash risk studies have identified
particular situations where older drivers are most at risk. These
situations often require significant visual search and attention, such
as maneuvers at intersections and in merging situations.
As the effect of this age-related decline in visual search and
attention on safe driving abilities has become better understood,
researchers have developed different strategies and techniques to
ameliorate it. The visual scanning training protocol that is the focus
of this study was designed to be delivered by a generalist occupational
therapist (OT). The OT would conduct the one-on-one sessions in a
clinical setting, targeting visual field expansion, simultaneous
processing of multiple visual stimuli, and ocular skill (visual search
routine) exercises. NHTSA's study ``Validation of Rehabilitation
Training Programs for Older Drivers'' (DOT HS 811 749; April 2013)
provided a preliminary analysis of the training's effectiveness. While
these results were encouraging, the research team concluded that
widespread promotion of this intervention would require additional
evidence.
Following efforts to refine and streamline the training protocol, a
larger sample of healthy older drivers will receive the updated
training program. The study will measure effectiveness of the training
by comparison of CDRS road test scores to a control group while also
gauging drivers' attitudes and perceptions about the training
experience. The original training program developer and supporting
research team will direct and perform this study.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)--
Responds will be residents of a continuing care retirement community.
Residents interested in participating will be excluded if they have
been advised to alter or restrict driving by a physician/health care
professional; if they require use of any adaptive vehicle controls
(e.g., hand controls or left foot accelerator); if they have color
vision problems; or if they do not hold a valid driver's license. We
anticipate screening 135 residents to recruit 90 older drivers for the
study with 60 between the ages of 70 and 79 and 30 ages 80 or older. A
roughly equal distribution of males and females will be sought within
each age cohort. Overall, 45 older drivers will be randomly assigned to
the treatment group (visual scanning training protocol) and 45 to the
control (placebo) group (internet search strategies for locating
information and resources to improve driving safety).
The screening of the estimated 135 respondents will occur once. The
response to informed consent and check for vision limitations for the
90 participants occurs just once, but the study requires participation
in the subsequent four training sessions and three on-road driving
evaluations. The 45 participants who received the training will
complete a brief one-time questionnaire about attitudes and beliefs
about the training program administered at the end of the training
protocol.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information--The total estimated
burden for this information collection is 689 hours and 15 minutes. The
estimated 135 post-presentation sign-up interactions to learn the age
of interested candidates and ask the questions about exclusion criteria
will average 3 minutes in length for an estimated total burden of 6
hours and 45 minutes. All of the 90 participants will attend a 30-
minute meeting to obtain informed consent and check for color and
binocular vision limitations, four one-hour training sessions, and
three one-hour on-road evaluations for an estimated total burden of 675
hours. The 45 treatment group participants also will be asked to
complete a ten-minute questionnaire to collect attitudes and beliefs
about the visual scanning training protocol for a total estimated
burden of 7 hours and 30 minutes. Participants will incur no costs from
the data collection, and participants will incur no record keeping
burden and no record keeping cost from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).
Issued in Washington, DC on July 7, 2017.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2017-14931 Filed 7-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P