Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rules To Eliminate ALO and Day ISO Orders and Related Functionality, Provide That All Pegged Orders Would Be Non-Displayed Orders, Change References From “NYSE MKT” to “NYSE American,” and Add the Definition of “NYSE American Marketplace”, 32745-32749 [2017-14885]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 135 / Monday, July 17, 2017 / Notices
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–
2017–32, and should be submitted on or
before August 7, 2017.
‘‘Act’’),2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on June 29,
2017, NYSE MKT LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of these
statements.
[FR Doc. 2017–14892 Filed 7–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
[Release No. 34–81115; File No. SR–
NYSEMKT–2017–38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Exchange
Rules To Eliminate ALO and Day ISO
Orders and Related Functionality,
Provide That All Pegged Orders Would
Be Non-Displayed Orders, Change
References From ‘‘NYSE MKT’’ to
‘‘NYSE American,’’ and Add the
Definition of ‘‘NYSE American
Marketplace’’
July 11, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange rules to (1) eliminate ALO and
Day ISO orders and related
functionality; (2) provide that all Pegged
Orders would be non-displayed orders;
(3) change references from ‘‘NYSE
MKT’’ to ‘‘NYSE American’’; (4) add the
definition of ‘‘NYSE American
Marketplace’’; and (5) make other
conforming rule changes. The proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange rules to (1) eliminate Add
Liquidity Only (‘‘ALO’’) Orders and Day
Intermarket Sweep Orders (‘‘ISO’’) and
related functionality; (2) provide that all
Pegged Orders would be non-displayed
orders; (3) change references from
‘‘NYSE MKT’’ to ‘‘NYSE American’’; (4)
add the definition of ‘‘NYSE American
Marketplace’’; and (5) make other
conforming rule changes.
12 17
2 15
1 15
3 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jul 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78a.
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
32745
To effect its transition to Pillar, the
Exchange has adopted the rule
numbering framework of the NYSE Arca
Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’)
rules for Exchange cash equities trading
on the Pillar trading platform.4 As
described in the Framework Filing, the
Exchange is denoting the rules
applicable to cash equities trading on
Pillar with the letter ‘‘E’’ to distinguish
such rules from current Exchange rules
with the same numbering. The
Exchange’s trading rules for cash equity
trading on Pillar are also based on the
trading rules of NYSE Arca Equities.5 As
described in the Trading Rules Filing,
with Pillar, the Exchange will transition
its cash equities trading platform from a
Floor-based market with a parity
allocation model to a fully automated
price-time priority allocation model that
trades all NMS Stocks. In addition, the
Exchange will introduce a delay
mechanism on Pillar that will add the
equivalent of 350 microseconds of
latency to inbound and outbound order
messages, as described in greater detail
in Rules 1.1E(y) and 7.29E(b).6
In the Delay Mechanism Filing, the
Exchange represented that in
conjunction with implementing the
Delay Mechanism, it would no longer
offer ALO or Day ISO functionality and
all Pegged Orders would not be
displayed.7 Because the Exchange has
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79242
(November 4, 2016), 81 FR 79081 (November 10,
2016) (SR–NYSEMKT–2016–97) (Notice and Filing
of Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change) (the ‘‘Framework Filing’’). In addition, the
Exchange has filed a proposed rule change to
support Exchange trading of securities listed on
other national securities exchanges on an unlisted
trading privileges basis, including Exchange Traded
Products (‘‘ETP’’) listed on other exchanges. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 79400
(November 25, 2016), 81 FR 86750 (December 1,
2016) (SR–NYSEMKT–2016–103) (Notice) and
81038 (June 28, 2017) (SR–NYSEMKT–2016–103)
(Approval Order) (the ‘‘ETP Listing Rules Filing’’).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80590
(May 4, 2017), 82 FR 21843 (May 10, 2017)
(Approval Order) and 79993 (February 9, 2017), 82
FR 10814 (February 15, 2017) (SR–NYSEMKT–
2017–01) (Notice) (‘‘Trading Rules Filing’’). The
Exchange also has established market maker
obligations when trading on the Pillar trading
platform. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
80577 (May 2, 2017), 82 FR 21446 (May 8, 2017)
(SR–NYSEMKT–2017–04) (Approval Order).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80700
(May 16, 2017), 82 FR 23381 (May 22, 2017) (SR–
NYSEMKT–2017–05) (Approval Order) and 79998
(February 9, 2017), 82 FR 10828 (February 15, 2017)
(SR–NYSEMKT–2017–05) (Notice) (‘‘Delay
Mechanism Filing’’).
7 Rule 7.31E (Orders and Modifiers) currently
describes ALO Orders, Day ISO Orders, and Pegged
Orders. These order types are based on NYSE Arca
Equities ALO, Day ISO, and Pegged Orders,
including that Primary Pegged Orders are required
to have a minimum display quantity. In the Delay
Mechanism Filing, the Exchange represented that,
before implementing the Delay Mechanism, the
Continued
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
32746
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 135 / Monday, July 17, 2017 / Notices
not yet transitioned to Pillar, the
Exchange proposes to amend its rules
relating to ALO, Day ISO, and Pegged
Orders before transitioning to Pillar, as
described in the Delay Mechanism
Filing, so that it can implement the
Delay Mechanism when it transitions to
Pillar. The Exchange proposes
additional amendments to its rules,
described below, before implementing
the Pillar trading platform.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Rule Changes
To eliminate ALO Orders, the
Exchange proposes to delete rule text
relating to ALO Orders and Non-Display
Remove Modifiers, which is
functionality that is operative only in
conjunction with a contra-side incoming
ALO Order. The Exchange would make
the following changes to its rules:
• Delete Rule 7.31E(e)(2) and its
subparagraphs, which describe ALO
Orders, and replace that section of the
Rule with the term ‘‘Reserved.’’
• Delete Rule 7.31E(d)(2)(B), which
provides that Limit Non-Display Orders
may be designated with a Non-Display
Remove Modifier.
• Delete the last sentence of Rule
7.31E(d)(3)(E) and Rules 7.31E(d)(3)(F)
and (G), which describe MPL–ALO
Orders and related Non-Display Remove
Modifier functionality.
• Delete Rule 7.31E(e)(1)(C), which
provides that an MKT Only Order may
be designated with a Non-Display
Remove Modifier.
• Amend Rule 7.31E(j)(1) to delete
the reference to ‘‘ALO Order.’’
• Amend Rules 7.46E(f)(5)(F)(ii) and
(iii) to delete references to ALO Orders.
To effect the changes described in the
Delay Mechanism Filing to eliminate
Day ISO Orders, the Exchange proposes
to delete text relating to Day ISOs and
amend its rules as follows:
• Delete Rules 7.31E(e)(3)(C) and (D),
which describe Day ISO and Day ISO
ALO Orders. The Exchange also
proposes to amend Rule 7.31E(e)(3) to
provide that an ISO must be designated
IOC and to delete the specific reference
to ‘‘IOC ISO’’ in Rule 7.31E(e)(3)(B).
• Amend Rules 7.11E(a)(5P)(A) and
7.11E(a)(5P)(A)(ii) to delete references to
‘‘Day ISO’’ and make related conforming
changes.
• Amend Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(C) to delete
the last two sentences, which describes
how Limit Orders are repriced upon
arrival of a Day ISO.
• Amend Rule 7.35E(h)(3)(C) to delete
the last sentence, which describes how
Exchange would file a separate proposed rule
change to eliminate ALO and Day ISO Orders and
related functionality and to provide that Primary
Pegged Orders would not be displayed.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jul 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
Day ISOs are processed when
transitioning to continuous trading.
• Delete current Rule
7.46E(f)(5)(F)(i)(a), which relates to Day
ISO Orders, and the designation of
subparagraph (b). The text of current
Rule 7.46E(f)(5)(F)(i)(b) would become
the last sentence of 7.46E(f)(5)(F)(i).
To effect the changes described in the
Delay Mechanism to make all Pegged
Orders non-displayed, the Exchange
proposes to amend its rules to provide
for Primary Pegged Orders to operate
similarly to Market Pegged Orders and
Discretionary Pegged Orders not only in
that they would not be displayed, but
also with respect to how they would
function (i) when the PBBO is locked or
crossed, (ii) in different trading sessions,
and (iii) in auctions. To effect these
changes, the Exchange proposes to
amend its rules as follows:
• Amend Rule 7.31E(h) to move rule
text that is currently applicable to
Market Pegged Orders and make it
applicable to all Pegged Orders, as
follows (new text italicized):
(h) Pegged Orders. A Limit Order that
does not route with a working price that
is pegged to a dynamic reference price.
If the designated reference price is
higher (lower) than the limit price of a
Pegged Order to buy (sell), the working
price will be the limit price of the order.
Pegged Orders are not displayed, are
ranked Priority 3—Non-Displayed
Orders, and are not eligible to
participate in auctions. If the PBBO is
locked or crossed, both an arriving and
resting Pegged Order will wait for a
PBBO that is not locked or crossed
before the working price is adjusted and
the order becomes eligible to trade. A
Pegged Order will be rejected on arrival,
or cancelled when resting, if there is no
PBO (PBB) against which to peg.
• Amend Rule 7.31E(h)(1) describing
Market Pegged Orders to delete, as
duplicative of proposed Rule 7.31E(h),
the second sentence, sub-paragraphs (A)
and (B) of that Rule, and the designation
of subparagraph (C). The text of current
Rule 7.31E(h)(1)(C) would become the
second sentence of Rule 7.31E(h)(1).
• Amend Rule 7.31E(h)(2) defining
and describing Primary Pegged Orders
to delete the last two sentences and subparagraphs (A) and (B) of that Rule as
no longer applicable.
• Delete reference to Primary Pegged
Orders in Rule 7.31E(d)(1)(C) because
Primary Pegged Orders would not
include a display quantity and therefore
would no longer be able to be combined
with Reserve Orders.
• Make conforming changes to Rule
7.31E(h)(3) defining and describing
Discretionary Pegged Orders by deleting
rule text in Rules 7.31E(h)(3)(A) and (E)
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that would be duplicative of the
proposed new rule text in Rule 7.31E(h),
described above.
• Amend Rule 7.18E(c)(4) governing
halts in Exchange-listed securities to
replace the term ‘‘Market Pegged
Orders’’ with ‘‘Pegged Orders’’ because
all Pegged Orders would function
similarly to Market Pegged Orders
during a halt or pause in an Exchangelisted security.8 With this proposed
change, all Pegged Orders, including
Primary Pegged Orders and
Discretionary Pegged Orders, would be
processed in the same manner as Market
Pegged Orders during a halt or pause in
trading of an Exchange-listed security.
• Replace the term ‘‘Market Pegged
Order’’ with ‘‘Pegged Order’’ and delete
reference to ‘‘Discretionary Pegged
Orders’’ in Rule 7.34E(c)(1)(A) because
all Pegged Orders would be rejected
when entered during the Early Trading
Session, regardless of the session
designation on the order.
In addition to the proposed
amendments that the Exchange
described in the Delay Mechanism
Filing, the Exchange also proposes to
amend its Pillar rules to replace
references to ‘‘NYSE MKT’’ with
references to ‘‘NYSE American.’’ These
proposed changes are consistent with
the Exchange’s proposed name change
to NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE
American’’), which will become
operative upon effectiveness of an
amendment to the Exchange’s
Certificate of Formation.9 Because the
Exchange will implement the Pillar
trading platform to coincide with the
effectiveness of the name change to
NYSE American, the Exchange believes
that amending the rules governing
trading on the Pillar trading platform to
use the term ‘‘NYSE American’’ instead
of ‘‘NYSE MKT’’ would be appropriate.
To effect the name change, the
Exchange proposes to amend Rule
1.1E(k), which defines the term
‘‘Exchange,’’ to replace the term ‘‘NYSE
MKT’’ with ‘‘NYSE American.’’ The
Exchange also proposes to rename the
order type ‘‘MKT Only Order’’ as an
‘‘Non-routable Limit Order,’’ and would
amend Rules 7.31E(d)(1)(C), (e)(1), (j)(1),
and 7.46E(f)(5)(F)(ii) and (iii)
accordingly. The Exchange believes that
the proposed new name for the ‘‘MKT
Only Order’’ describes the functionality
8 The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule
7.18E(c)(4) to delete references to ‘‘Retail Orders.’’
The Exchange will not offer a Retail Liquidity
Program on its Pillar trading platform, and therefore
references to Retail Orders are moot. See Trading
Rules Filing Notice supra note 5 at 10815.
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80283
(March 21, 2017), 82 FR 15244 (March 27, 2017)
(SR–NYSEMKT–2017–14).
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 135 / Monday, July 17, 2017 / Notices
associated with this order type because
it is not eligible to route. The Exchange
would also amend Rule 7.45E(a) to
replace references to the term ‘‘NYSE
MKT LLC’’ with the term ‘‘the
Exchange.’’
The Exchange also proposes to add to
Exchange rules the definition of ‘‘NYSE
American Marketplace,’’ which would
be defined in Rule 1.1E(e) as ‘‘the
electronic securities communications
and trading facility of the Exchange
through which orders are processed or
are consolidated for execution and/or
display.’’ This proposed definition is
based in part on NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 1.1(e), which defines the term
‘‘NYSE Arca Marketplace’’ as ‘‘the
electronic securities communications
and trading facility designated by the
Board of Directors through which orders
of Users are consolidated for execution
and/or display.’’ The Exchange proposes
a non-substantive difference from NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 1.1(e) not to include
reference to the phrase ‘‘designated by
the Board of Directors’’ because the
Exchange’s Board of Directors does not
designate which technology at the
Exchange performs the various
functions of the Exchange. The
Exchange also proposes not to use the
term ‘‘Users’’ as moot. The Exchange
further proposes a difference to add that
the term ‘‘NYSE American Marketplace’’
includes the facility where orders are
processed, in addition to the facility
where orders are consolidated for
execution and/or display.
The Exchange believes that adding the
term ‘‘NYSE American Marketplace’’ to
Exchange rules provides for a term that
describes the Exchange’s facilities
where orders are processed or are
consolidated for execution and/or
display. The Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 7.29E(a) and Rule
7.29E(b)(1)(C) to replace the term
‘‘Exchange’’ with ‘‘NYSE American
Marketplace’’ because the Exchange
believes that the term ‘‘NYSE American
Marketplace’’ in this context is more
descriptive.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
Rule 7.29E(b)(1)(A) and (B) to add the
term ‘‘NYSE American Marketplace’’ in
order to provide specificity that the
Delay Mechanism would be operative
for inbound and outbound
communications to and from ETP
Holders. Inbound and outbound
communications from ETP Holders, that
are processed through the same
electronic securities communications
and trading facilities as orders, such as
log on or log out messages, would be
subject to the Delay Mechanism. The
Exchange believes that this proposed
rule change is consistent with the rules
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jul 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
governing the Delay Mechanism.
Specifically, in the Delay Mechanism
Filing, the Exchange described that the
Delay Mechanism functionality is
designed to provide for additional
latency under the same circumstances
as the intentional latency on Investors
Exchange LLC (‘‘IEX’’).10 IEX Rule
11.510, upon which Rule 7.29E is based,
specifies that the IEX intentional delay
is for inbound and outbound
communications to IEX’s ‘‘System.’’ IEX
defines ‘‘System’’ to mean ‘‘the
electronic communications and trading
facility designated by the Board through
which securities orders of Members are
consolidated for ranking, execution, and
when applicable, routing.’’ 11 The
Exchange believes that its proposed
definition of ‘‘NYSE American
Marketplace’’ describes facilities that
provide similar functionality as the
facilities defined in the IEX term
‘‘System.’’ As such, the Exchange’s
proposal to add the phrase ‘‘the NYSE
American Marketplace’’ in Rule 7.29E(b)
would make clear that the Delay
Mechanism would be added to all
inbound and outbound communications
to and from facilities where orders are
processed or are consolidated for
execution and/or display. Accordingly,
the Exchange believes that adding the
term ‘‘NYSE American Marketplace’’ to
Rule 7.29E(b) is consistent with the
original intent of the rule and provides
greater specificity and transparency in
Exchange rules regarding how the Delay
Mechanism would function, without
any differences.
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
update Exchange rules to reflect recent
changes to Supplementary Material .70
to Rule 67—Equities that amended the
date when certain data would be
published by the Exchange.12 The
Exchange proposes to amend
Commentary .70 to Rule 7.46E to make
the same date change.
*
*
*
*
*
The Exchange will announce the
implementation of its transition to
Pillar, and thus when these proposed
rule changes would be implemented, by
Trader Update, which the Exchange
anticipates will be in the third quarter
of 2017.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
10 See Delay Mechanism Filing Notice, supra note
6 at 10829.
11 See IEX Rule 1.160(nn).
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80648
(May 10, 2017), 82 FR 22590 (May 16, 2017) (SR–
NYSEMKT–2017–24) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change).
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32747
‘‘Act’’),13 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),14 in
particular, because it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange believes that its
proposed rule change to eliminate ALO
Orders, Day ISOs, and related
functionality would remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system because
the proposed deletions are designed to
work in conjunction with the
Exchange’s Delay Mechanism, as
described in the Delay Mechanism
Filing. The proposed changes would
also remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system
because they would simplify the
Exchange’s trading model on Pillar and
operate more similarly to IEX, which
also does not offer ALO, Day ISO, or
related functionality. The Exchange
further believes that deleting these order
types and related functionality would be
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because the Exchange has not
implemented Pillar and therefore these
order types are not yet available for
trading on Pillar. Deleting these order
types before implementation therefore
would not impact any market
participants.
The Exchange believes that its
proposed rule change to make all
Pegged Orders be non-displayed is
consistent with the purpose of the Delay
Mechanism, which is to allow nondisplayed Pegged Orders to update in
real-time based on changes to the PBBO
before a new, incoming order generated
in response to the same PBBO change
can access the resting order. By
changing Primary Pegged Orders to be
non-displayed, Primary Pegged Orders
would be able to be re-priced in realtime as well. The Exchange therefore
believes that this proposed change
would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system because it would allow for
Primary Pegged Orders to benefit from
a market structure that includes a Delay
13 15
14 15
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
17JYN1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
32748
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 135 / Monday, July 17, 2017 / Notices
Mechanism. The proposed changes
would also remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system because the proposed
functionality is based on how IEX
operates, which also does not offer
displayed pegging functionality.15 In
addition, the Exchange believes that the
proposed change is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest because the Exchange has not
implemented its Pillar trading platform
and therefore a displayed Primary
Pegged Order is not yet available for
trading on Pillar. Amending Primary
Pegged Order functionality before
implementation would therefore not
impact any market participants trading.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed amendment to change
references from ‘‘NYSE MKT’’ to ‘‘NYSE
American’’ is designed to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system because it
would ensure that the Exchange’s rules
accurately reflects the name of the
Exchange that will be in effect when it
transitions to Pillar, which will make
the rule book easier to navigate.
The Exchange believes that adding to
Exchange rules the term ‘‘NYSE
American Marketplace,’’ which is based
in part on the term ‘‘NYSE Arca
Marketplace’’ in NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 1.1(k), would remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market
system because it would add a term
designed to describe with greater
specificity the Exchange’s facility that
processes or executes and/or displays
orders. The Exchange further believes
that amending Rules 7.29E(a) and (b) to
add the term ‘‘NYSE American
Marketplace’’ would remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system by
providing specificity of which
communications would be subject to the
Delay Mechanism. The Exchange
believes that the proposed amendment
to use this term in Rule 7.29E(b) is a
non-substantive change that is
consistent with the original intent of the
rule to provide for additional latency
under the same circumstances as IEX.
As such, the proposed change is
designed to provide greater specificity
and transparency in Exchange rules
regarding how the Delay Mechanism
would function, without any
differences.
15 See IEX Rule 11.190(a)(3) (defining Pegged
Order on IEX).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jul 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 16 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.17
A proposed rule change filed
pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the
Act 18 normally does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its
filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 19
permits the Commission to designate a
shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. The Exchange states that waiver
of the operative delay would be
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because it would allow the proposed
rule change to be operative at the same
time that the Exchange begins its
transition to Pillar and implements the
Delay Mechanism, which the Exchange
anticipates will be on July 24, 2017. The
Exchange states that a waiver will
thereby reduce any potential for
confusion of how orders would be
processed when the Exchange
transitions to Pillar and implements the
Delay Mechanism. The Commission
believes that waiver of the operative
delay is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
waives the operative delay and
designates the proposal operative upon
filing.20
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend the rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
Finally, the Exchange believes that
the proposed change to Commentary .70
to Rule 7.46E would remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system by
updating Rule 7.46E to reflect recent
changes to Supplementary Material .70
to Rule 67—Equities that amended the
date when certain data would be
published by the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed changes to ALO, Day ISO, and
Pegged Orders are designed to
implement changes previously
described in the Delay Mechanism
Filing. As such, these proposed changes
are designed to provide a competitive
trading model to IEX by offering similar
order type functionality as IEX in
combination with the Exchange’s Delay
Mechanism. The Exchange’s proposal is
therefore designed to promote
competition by offering a choice of
exchanges to those ETP Holders and
issuers that prefer to trade or list on an
exchange that offers a delay mechanism
and the related order type offerings. The
proposed changes to change the name of
the Exchange to ‘‘NYSE American’’ and
add the term ‘‘NYSE American
Marketplace’’ are not designed to
address any competitive issues but
rather are designed to provide greater
specificity in Exchange rules regarding
the name of the Exchange and a term to
define the Exchange’s facility that
executes and/or displays orders.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). As required under Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission.
18 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
19 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
20 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
17 17
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 135 / Monday, July 17, 2017 / Notices
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2017–38 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2017–38. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2017–38, and should be
submitted on or before August 7, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–14885 Filed 7–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
21 17
17:45 Jul 14, 2017
Data Collection Available for Public
Comments
60 day notice and request for
comments.
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the Small Business
Administration’s intentions to request
approval on a new and/or currently
approved information collection.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
September 15, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send all comments
regarding whether this information
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of the function of the
agency, whether the burden estimates
are accurate, and if there are ways to
minimize the estimated burden and
enhance the quality of the collection, to
Amy Kim, Program Manager, Office of
Contract Assistance, Small Business
Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 8th
Floor, Washington, DC 20416.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Kim, 202–205–6915 amy.kim@
sba.gov, Curtis B. Rich, Management
Analyst, 202–205–7030 curtis.rich@
sba.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: ‘‘Certification for the WomenOwned Small Business Federal Contract
Program’’.
Abstract: The Small Business Act
states that a women-owned small
(WOSB) or an economically
disadvantaged women-owned small
business (EDWOSB) must (1) be a
Federal agency, a State government, or
a national certifying entity as a WOSB.
or, (2) certify to the contracting office
that it is a WOSB and provide adequate
documentation to support such
certification. These documents will be
used by the SBA, contracting offices and
third party certifies to determine
program eligibility and compliance.
Description of Respondents: Women
Owned Small Businesses.
Form Number’s: 2413, 2414.
Annual Responses: 12,000.
Annual Burden: 24,400.
Curtis Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2017–14899 Filed 7–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Release of Waybill Data
The Surface Transportation Board has
received a request from Hines (WB17–
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32749
33—7/8/17) for permission to use
masked data from the Board’s 2009–
2014 Carload Waybill Samples. A copy
of this request may be obtained from the
Office of Economics.
The waybill sample contains
confidential railroad and shipper data;
therefore, if any parties object to these
requests, they should file their
objections with the Director of the
Board’s Office of Economics within 14
calendar days of the date of this notice.
The rules for release of waybill data are
codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
Contact: Alexander Dusenberry, (202)
245–0319.
Kenyatta Clay,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2017–14932 Filed 7–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Summary Notice No. PE–2017–56]
Petition for Exemption; Summary of
Petition Received
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption
received.
AGENCY:
This notice contains a
summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal
Aviation Regulations. The purpose of
this notice is to improve the public’s
awareness of, and participation in, this
aspect of the FAA’s regulatory activities.
Neither publication of this notice nor
the inclusion or omission of information
in the summary is intended to affect the
legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.
SUMMARY:
Comments on this petition must
identify the petition docket number
involved and must be received on or
before August 7, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2017–0584
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 135 (Monday, July 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32745-32749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14885]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-81115; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2017-38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rules
To Eliminate ALO and Day ISO Orders and Related Functionality, Provide
That All Pegged Orders Would Be Non-Displayed Orders, Change References
From ``NYSE MKT'' to ``NYSE American,'' and Add the Definition of
``NYSE American Marketplace''
July 11, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on June 29, 2017, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange rules to (1) eliminate ALO
and Day ISO orders and related functionality; (2) provide that all
Pegged Orders would be non-displayed orders; (3) change references from
``NYSE MKT'' to ``NYSE American''; (4) add the definition of ``NYSE
American Marketplace''; and (5) make other conforming rule changes. The
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of these statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange rules to (1) eliminate Add
Liquidity Only (``ALO'') Orders and Day Intermarket Sweep Orders
(``ISO'') and related functionality; (2) provide that all Pegged Orders
would be non-displayed orders; (3) change references from ``NYSE MKT''
to ``NYSE American''; (4) add the definition of ``NYSE American
Marketplace''; and (5) make other conforming rule changes.
To effect its transition to Pillar, the Exchange has adopted the
rule numbering framework of the NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE Arca
Equities'') rules for Exchange cash equities trading on the Pillar
trading platform.\4\ As described in the Framework Filing, the Exchange
is denoting the rules applicable to cash equities trading on Pillar
with the letter ``E'' to distinguish such rules from current Exchange
rules with the same numbering. The Exchange's trading rules for cash
equity trading on Pillar are also based on the trading rules of NYSE
Arca Equities.\5\ As described in the Trading Rules Filing, with
Pillar, the Exchange will transition its cash equities trading platform
from a Floor-based market with a parity allocation model to a fully
automated price-time priority allocation model that trades all NMS
Stocks. In addition, the Exchange will introduce a delay mechanism on
Pillar that will add the equivalent of 350 microseconds of latency to
inbound and outbound order messages, as described in greater detail in
Rules 1.1E(y) and 7.29E(b).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79242 (November 4,
2016), 81 FR 79081 (November 10, 2016) (SR-NYSEMKT-2016-97) (Notice
and Filing of Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change) (the
``Framework Filing''). In addition, the Exchange has filed a
proposed rule change to support Exchange trading of securities
listed on other national securities exchanges on an unlisted trading
privileges basis, including Exchange Traded Products (``ETP'')
listed on other exchanges. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
79400 (November 25, 2016), 81 FR 86750 (December 1, 2016) (SR-
NYSEMKT-2016-103) (Notice) and 81038 (June 28, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-
2016-103) (Approval Order) (the ``ETP Listing Rules Filing'').
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80590 (May 4,
2017), 82 FR 21843 (May 10, 2017) (Approval Order) and 79993
(February 9, 2017), 82 FR 10814 (February 15, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-
2017-01) (Notice) (``Trading Rules Filing''). The Exchange also has
established market maker obligations when trading on the Pillar
trading platform. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80577 (May
2, 2017), 82 FR 21446 (May 8, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-04) (Approval
Order).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80700 (May 16,
2017), 82 FR 23381 (May 22, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-05) (Approval
Order) and 79998 (February 9, 2017), 82 FR 10828 (February 15, 2017)
(SR-NYSEMKT-2017-05) (Notice) (``Delay Mechanism Filing'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Delay Mechanism Filing, the Exchange represented that in
conjunction with implementing the Delay Mechanism, it would no longer
offer ALO or Day ISO functionality and all Pegged Orders would not be
displayed.\7\ Because the Exchange has
[[Page 32746]]
not yet transitioned to Pillar, the Exchange proposes to amend its
rules relating to ALO, Day ISO, and Pegged Orders before transitioning
to Pillar, as described in the Delay Mechanism Filing, so that it can
implement the Delay Mechanism when it transitions to Pillar. The
Exchange proposes additional amendments to its rules, described below,
before implementing the Pillar trading platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Rule 7.31E (Orders and Modifiers) currently describes ALO
Orders, Day ISO Orders, and Pegged Orders. These order types are
based on NYSE Arca Equities ALO, Day ISO, and Pegged Orders,
including that Primary Pegged Orders are required to have a minimum
display quantity. In the Delay Mechanism Filing, the Exchange
represented that, before implementing the Delay Mechanism, the
Exchange would file a separate proposed rule change to eliminate ALO
and Day ISO Orders and related functionality and to provide that
Primary Pegged Orders would not be displayed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Changes
To eliminate ALO Orders, the Exchange proposes to delete rule text
relating to ALO Orders and Non-Display Remove Modifiers, which is
functionality that is operative only in conjunction with a contra-side
incoming ALO Order. The Exchange would make the following changes to
its rules:
Delete Rule 7.31E(e)(2) and its subparagraphs, which
describe ALO Orders, and replace that section of the Rule with the term
``Reserved.''
Delete Rule 7.31E(d)(2)(B), which provides that Limit Non-
Display Orders may be designated with a Non-Display Remove Modifier.
Delete the last sentence of Rule 7.31E(d)(3)(E) and Rules
7.31E(d)(3)(F) and (G), which describe MPL-ALO Orders and related Non-
Display Remove Modifier functionality.
Delete Rule 7.31E(e)(1)(C), which provides that an MKT
Only Order may be designated with a Non-Display Remove Modifier.
Amend Rule 7.31E(j)(1) to delete the reference to ``ALO
Order.''
Amend Rules 7.46E(f)(5)(F)(ii) and (iii) to delete
references to ALO Orders.
To effect the changes described in the Delay Mechanism Filing to
eliminate Day ISO Orders, the Exchange proposes to delete text relating
to Day ISOs and amend its rules as follows:
Delete Rules 7.31E(e)(3)(C) and (D), which describe Day
ISO and Day ISO ALO Orders. The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule
7.31E(e)(3) to provide that an ISO must be designated IOC and to delete
the specific reference to ``IOC ISO'' in Rule 7.31E(e)(3)(B).
Amend Rules 7.11E(a)(5P)(A) and 7.11E(a)(5P)(A)(ii) to
delete references to ``Day ISO'' and make related conforming changes.
Amend Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(C) to delete the last two
sentences, which describes how Limit Orders are repriced upon arrival
of a Day ISO.
Amend Rule 7.35E(h)(3)(C) to delete the last sentence,
which describes how Day ISOs are processed when transitioning to
continuous trading.
Delete current Rule 7.46E(f)(5)(F)(i)(a), which relates to
Day ISO Orders, and the designation of subparagraph (b). The text of
current Rule 7.46E(f)(5)(F)(i)(b) would become the last sentence of
7.46E(f)(5)(F)(i).
To effect the changes described in the Delay Mechanism to make all
Pegged Orders non-displayed, the Exchange proposes to amend its rules
to provide for Primary Pegged Orders to operate similarly to Market
Pegged Orders and Discretionary Pegged Orders not only in that they
would not be displayed, but also with respect to how they would
function (i) when the PBBO is locked or crossed, (ii) in different
trading sessions, and (iii) in auctions. To effect these changes, the
Exchange proposes to amend its rules as follows:
Amend Rule 7.31E(h) to move rule text that is currently
applicable to Market Pegged Orders and make it applicable to all Pegged
Orders, as follows (new text italicized):
(h) Pegged Orders. A Limit Order that does not route with a working
price that is pegged to a dynamic reference price. If the designated
reference price is higher (lower) than the limit price of a Pegged
Order to buy (sell), the working price will be the limit price of the
order. Pegged Orders are not displayed, are ranked Priority 3--Non-
Displayed Orders, and are not eligible to participate in auctions. If
the PBBO is locked or crossed, both an arriving and resting Pegged
Order will wait for a PBBO that is not locked or crossed before the
working price is adjusted and the order becomes eligible to trade. A
Pegged Order will be rejected on arrival, or cancelled when resting, if
there is no PBO (PBB) against which to peg.
Amend Rule 7.31E(h)(1) describing Market Pegged Orders to
delete, as duplicative of proposed Rule 7.31E(h), the second sentence,
sub-paragraphs (A) and (B) of that Rule, and the designation of
subparagraph (C). The text of current Rule 7.31E(h)(1)(C) would become
the second sentence of Rule 7.31E(h)(1).
Amend Rule 7.31E(h)(2) defining and describing Primary
Pegged Orders to delete the last two sentences and sub-paragraphs (A)
and (B) of that Rule as no longer applicable.
Delete reference to Primary Pegged Orders in Rule
7.31E(d)(1)(C) because Primary Pegged Orders would not include a
display quantity and therefore would no longer be able to be combined
with Reserve Orders.
Make conforming changes to Rule 7.31E(h)(3) defining and
describing Discretionary Pegged Orders by deleting rule text in Rules
7.31E(h)(3)(A) and (E) that would be duplicative of the proposed new
rule text in Rule 7.31E(h), described above.
Amend Rule 7.18E(c)(4) governing halts in Exchange-listed
securities to replace the term ``Market Pegged Orders'' with ``Pegged
Orders'' because all Pegged Orders would function similarly to Market
Pegged Orders during a halt or pause in an Exchange-listed security.\8\
With this proposed change, all Pegged Orders, including Primary Pegged
Orders and Discretionary Pegged Orders, would be processed in the same
manner as Market Pegged Orders during a halt or pause in trading of an
Exchange-listed security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule 7.18E(c)(4) to
delete references to ``Retail Orders.'' The Exchange will not offer
a Retail Liquidity Program on its Pillar trading platform, and
therefore references to Retail Orders are moot. See Trading Rules
Filing Notice supra note 5 at 10815.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace the term ``Market Pegged Order'' with ``Pegged
Order'' and delete reference to ``Discretionary Pegged Orders'' in Rule
7.34E(c)(1)(A) because all Pegged Orders would be rejected when entered
during the Early Trading Session, regardless of the session designation
on the order.
In addition to the proposed amendments that the Exchange described
in the Delay Mechanism Filing, the Exchange also proposes to amend its
Pillar rules to replace references to ``NYSE MKT'' with references to
``NYSE American.'' These proposed changes are consistent with the
Exchange's proposed name change to NYSE American LLC (``NYSE
American''), which will become operative upon effectiveness of an
amendment to the Exchange's Certificate of Formation.\9\ Because the
Exchange will implement the Pillar trading platform to coincide with
the effectiveness of the name change to NYSE American, the Exchange
believes that amending the rules governing trading on the Pillar
trading platform to use the term ``NYSE American'' instead of ``NYSE
MKT'' would be appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80283 (March 21,
2017), 82 FR 15244 (March 27, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To effect the name change, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule
1.1E(k), which defines the term ``Exchange,'' to replace the term
``NYSE MKT'' with ``NYSE American.'' The Exchange also proposes to
rename the order type ``MKT Only Order'' as an ``Non-routable Limit
Order,'' and would amend Rules 7.31E(d)(1)(C), (e)(1), (j)(1), and
7.46E(f)(5)(F)(ii) and (iii) accordingly. The Exchange believes that
the proposed new name for the ``MKT Only Order'' describes the
functionality
[[Page 32747]]
associated with this order type because it is not eligible to route.
The Exchange would also amend Rule 7.45E(a) to replace references to
the term ``NYSE MKT LLC'' with the term ``the Exchange.''
The Exchange also proposes to add to Exchange rules the definition
of ``NYSE American Marketplace,'' which would be defined in Rule
1.1E(e) as ``the electronic securities communications and trading
facility of the Exchange through which orders are processed or are
consolidated for execution and/or display.'' This proposed definition
is based in part on NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(e), which defines the
term ``NYSE Arca Marketplace'' as ``the electronic securities
communications and trading facility designated by the Board of
Directors through which orders of Users are consolidated for execution
and/or display.'' The Exchange proposes a non-substantive difference
from NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(e) not to include reference to the
phrase ``designated by the Board of Directors'' because the Exchange's
Board of Directors does not designate which technology at the Exchange
performs the various functions of the Exchange. The Exchange also
proposes not to use the term ``Users'' as moot. The Exchange further
proposes a difference to add that the term ``NYSE American
Marketplace'' includes the facility where orders are processed, in
addition to the facility where orders are consolidated for execution
and/or display.
The Exchange believes that adding the term ``NYSE American
Marketplace'' to Exchange rules provides for a term that describes the
Exchange's facilities where orders are processed or are consolidated
for execution and/or display. The Exchange proposes to amend Rule
7.29E(a) and Rule 7.29E(b)(1)(C) to replace the term ``Exchange'' with
``NYSE American Marketplace'' because the Exchange believes that the
term ``NYSE American Marketplace'' in this context is more descriptive.
The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule 7.29E(b)(1)(A) and (B) to
add the term ``NYSE American Marketplace'' in order to provide
specificity that the Delay Mechanism would be operative for inbound and
outbound communications to and from ETP Holders. Inbound and outbound
communications from ETP Holders, that are processed through the same
electronic securities communications and trading facilities as orders,
such as log on or log out messages, would be subject to the Delay
Mechanism. The Exchange believes that this proposed rule change is
consistent with the rules governing the Delay Mechanism. Specifically,
in the Delay Mechanism Filing, the Exchange described that the Delay
Mechanism functionality is designed to provide for additional latency
under the same circumstances as the intentional latency on Investors
Exchange LLC (``IEX'').\10\ IEX Rule 11.510, upon which Rule 7.29E is
based, specifies that the IEX intentional delay is for inbound and
outbound communications to IEX's ``System.'' IEX defines ``System'' to
mean ``the electronic communications and trading facility designated by
the Board through which securities orders of Members are consolidated
for ranking, execution, and when applicable, routing.'' \11\ The
Exchange believes that its proposed definition of ``NYSE American
Marketplace'' describes facilities that provide similar functionality
as the facilities defined in the IEX term ``System.'' As such, the
Exchange's proposal to add the phrase ``the NYSE American Marketplace''
in Rule 7.29E(b) would make clear that the Delay Mechanism would be
added to all inbound and outbound communications to and from facilities
where orders are processed or are consolidated for execution and/or
display. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that adding the term ``NYSE
American Marketplace'' to Rule 7.29E(b) is consistent with the original
intent of the rule and provides greater specificity and transparency in
Exchange rules regarding how the Delay Mechanism would function,
without any differences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Delay Mechanism Filing Notice, supra note 6 at 10829.
\11\ See IEX Rule 1.160(nn).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange proposes to update Exchange rules to reflect
recent changes to Supplementary Material .70 to Rule 67--Equities that
amended the date when certain data would be published by the
Exchange.\12\ The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .70 to Rule
7.46E to make the same date change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80648 (May 10,
2017), 82 FR 22590 (May 16, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-24) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
The Exchange will announce the implementation of its transition to
Pillar, and thus when these proposed rule changes would be implemented,
by Trader Update, which the Exchange anticipates will be in the third
quarter of 2017.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\13\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\14\ in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposed rule change to eliminate
ALO Orders, Day ISOs, and related functionality would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system because the proposed deletions are designed to
work in conjunction with the Exchange's Delay Mechanism, as described
in the Delay Mechanism Filing. The proposed changes would also remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system because they would simplify the Exchange's
trading model on Pillar and operate more similarly to IEX, which also
does not offer ALO, Day ISO, or related functionality. The Exchange
further believes that deleting these order types and related
functionality would be consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest because the Exchange has not implemented Pillar and
therefore these order types are not yet available for trading on
Pillar. Deleting these order types before implementation therefore
would not impact any market participants.
The Exchange believes that its proposed rule change to make all
Pegged Orders be non-displayed is consistent with the purpose of the
Delay Mechanism, which is to allow non-displayed Pegged Orders to
update in real-time based on changes to the PBBO before a new, incoming
order generated in response to the same PBBO change can access the
resting order. By changing Primary Pegged Orders to be non-displayed,
Primary Pegged Orders would be able to be re-priced in real-time as
well. The Exchange therefore believes that this proposed change would
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system because it would allow for Primary
Pegged Orders to benefit from a market structure that includes a Delay
[[Page 32748]]
Mechanism. The proposed changes would also remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system because the proposed functionality is based on how IEX operates,
which also does not offer displayed pegging functionality.\15\ In
addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed change is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest because the
Exchange has not implemented its Pillar trading platform and therefore
a displayed Primary Pegged Order is not yet available for trading on
Pillar. Amending Primary Pegged Order functionality before
implementation would therefore not impact any market participants
trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See IEX Rule 11.190(a)(3) (defining Pegged Order on IEX).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to change
references from ``NYSE MKT'' to ``NYSE American'' is designed to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system because it would ensure that the Exchange's
rules accurately reflects the name of the Exchange that will be in
effect when it transitions to Pillar, which will make the rule book
easier to navigate.
The Exchange believes that adding to Exchange rules the term ``NYSE
American Marketplace,'' which is based in part on the term ``NYSE Arca
Marketplace'' in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(k), would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system because it would add a term designed to
describe with greater specificity the Exchange's facility that
processes or executes and/or displays orders. The Exchange further
believes that amending Rules 7.29E(a) and (b) to add the term ``NYSE
American Marketplace'' would remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by
providing specificity of which communications would be subject to the
Delay Mechanism. The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to
use this term in Rule 7.29E(b) is a non-substantive change that is
consistent with the original intent of the rule to provide for
additional latency under the same circumstances as IEX. As such, the
proposed change is designed to provide greater specificity and
transparency in Exchange rules regarding how the Delay Mechanism would
function, without any differences.
Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed change to
Commentary .70 to Rule 7.46E would remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by
updating Rule 7.46E to reflect recent changes to Supplementary Material
.70 to Rule 67--Equities that amended the date when certain data would
be published by the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed changes to ALO,
Day ISO, and Pegged Orders are designed to implement changes previously
described in the Delay Mechanism Filing. As such, these proposed
changes are designed to provide a competitive trading model to IEX by
offering similar order type functionality as IEX in combination with
the Exchange's Delay Mechanism. The Exchange's proposal is therefore
designed to promote competition by offering a choice of exchanges to
those ETP Holders and issuers that prefer to trade or list on an
exchange that offers a delay mechanism and the related order type
offerings. The proposed changes to change the name of the Exchange to
``NYSE American'' and add the term ``NYSE American Marketplace'' are
not designed to address any competitive issues but rather are designed
to provide greater specificity in Exchange rules regarding the name of
the Exchange and a term to define the Exchange's facility that executes
and/or displays orders.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \18\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \19\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange
states that waiver of the operative delay would be consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest because it would allow
the proposed rule change to be operative at the same time that the
Exchange begins its transition to Pillar and implements the Delay
Mechanism, which the Exchange anticipates will be on July 24, 2017. The
Exchange states that a waiver will thereby reduce any potential for
confusion of how orders would be processed when the Exchange
transitions to Pillar and implements the Delay Mechanism. The
Commission believes that waiver of the operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore,
the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\20\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
[[Page 32749]]
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2017-38 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2017-38. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2017-38, and should
be submitted on or before August 7, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-14885 Filed 7-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P