Large Residential Washers From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 32169-32170 [2017-14610]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 12, 2017 / Notices
Web site, which is accessible via
www.trade.gov/ftz.
For further information, contact
Juanita Chen at Juanita.Chen@trade.gov
or (202) 482–1378.
Dated: July 6, 2017.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–14613 Filed 7–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–16–2017]
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 7—
Mayaguez, Puerto Rico; Authorization
of Production Activity; Bristol-Myers
Squibb Holdings Pharma, Ltd.
(Pharmaceuticals); Manati, Puerto Rico
On March 6, 2017, Bristol-Myers
Squibb Holdings Pharma, Ltd.
submitted a notification of proposed
production activity to the FTZ Board
within Subzone 7J, in Manati, Puerto
Rico.
The notification was processed in
accordance with the regulations of the
FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comment (82 FR 13578, March
14, 2017). On July 5, 2017, the applicant
was notified of the FTZ Board’s decision
that no further review of the activity is
warranted at this time. The production
activity described in the notification
was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act
and the FTZ Board’s regulations,
including Section 400.14.
Dated: July 7, 2017.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–14612 Filed 7–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–842]
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Large Residential Washers From
Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 6, 2017, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the third administrative
review of the antidumping duty (AD)
order on large residential washers
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
(LRWs) from Mexico. The period of
review (POR) is February 1, 2015, to
January 31, 2016. Based on our analysis
of the comments received and our
verification findings, we made certain
changes in the margin calculations.
Therefore, the final results differ from
the preliminary results. The final
weighted-average dumping margin for
the respondent, Electrolux Home
Products Corp. N.V. and Electrolux
Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
(collectively, Electrolux 1), is listed
below in the section entitled ‘‘Final
Results of the Review.’’
DATES: Effective July 12, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross
Belliveau or Rebecca Janz, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4952 or (202) 482–2972,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise:
Electrolux. On March 6, 2017, the
Department published the Preliminary
Results.2 In April 2017, the Department
verified the sales data reported by
Electrolux, in accordance with section
782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
In May 2017, we received case briefs
from Whirlpool Corporation (the
petitioner) and Electrolux. In June 2017,
we received a rebuttal brief from the
petitioner.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
all large residential washers and certain
subassemblies thereof from Mexico. The
products are currently classifiable under
subheadings 8450.20.0040 and
8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff
System of the United States (HTSUS).
Products subject to this order may also
enter under HTSUS subheadings
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080,
8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
inadvertently included Electrolux Home
Products, Inc. as a producer/exporter of subject
merchandise in our preliminary results. See Large
Residential Washers from Mexico: Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 12538 (March 6, 2017)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum (PDM)
at 1. However, Electrolux Home Products, Inc. is the
U.S. affiliate of Electrolux.
2 See Preliminary Results.
PO 00000
1 We
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32169
merchandise subject to this scope is
dispositive.3
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs by
parties are listed in the Appendix to this
notice and addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum. Parties can find
a complete discussion of these issues
and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum, which is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov; the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is also available
to all parties in the Central Records
Unit, room B8024, of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on comments received from
interested parties regarding our
Preliminary Results and our findings at
verification, we made certain changes to
the preliminary calculation of weightedaverage dumping margin calculations
for Electrolux.
Final Results of the Review
We are assigning the following
weighted-average dumping margin to
Electrolux:
Manufacturer/exporter
Electrolux Home Products Corp.
NV/Electrolux Home Products
de Mexico, S.A. de C.V ..........
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
3.67
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Duty Assessment
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the
3 A full description of the scope of the order is
contained in Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large
Residential Washers from Mexico,’’ dated
concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
32170
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 12, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Department has determined, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP
41 days after publication of the final
results of this administrative review.
For Electrolux, the Department
calculated an ad valorem importerspecific assessment rate equal to the
total amount of dumping calculated for
the importer’s examined sales and the
total entered value of those sales. Where
an importer-specific assessment rate is
zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent), the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate these entries without
regard to antidumping duties pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
The Department’s ‘‘automatic
assessment’’ practice will apply to
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR produced by Electrolux, for
which the company did not know that
its merchandise was destined for the
United States.4 In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate
established in the less-than fair-value
(LTFV) investigation (i.e., 36.52
percent),5 if there is no rate for the
intermediary company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for Electrolux will
be equal to the weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final
results of this administrative review; (2)
for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this administrative review but
covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recentlycompleted segment; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original LTFV
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recently4 See
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) for a full discussion of this
practice.
5 See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and
the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders,
78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 11, 2017
Jkt 241001
completed segment of this proceeding
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 36.52
percent, the all-others rate determined
in the LTFV investigation.6 These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers Regarding the
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5) of the
Department’s regulations.
Dated: July 5, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Margin Calculations
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1. The Department’s Use of
Zeroing
Comment 2. Methodological Issues in the
Differential Pricing Analysis
Comment 3. Calculation Errors in
Electrolux’s Margin Program
PO 00000
6 Id.
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–14610 Filed 7–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–010]
Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2014–
2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 7, 2017, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the first administrative review
(AR) of the antidumping duty (AD)
order on certain crystalline silicon
photovoltaic products from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). The period of
review (POR) for the AR is July 31,
2014, through January 31, 2016. The AR
covers nine companies including one
mandatory respondent. We received
comments from interested parties on our
preliminary results. Based on our
analysis of the comments received, we
made changes to the margin calculations
for the final results of this AR. The final
weighted-average dumping margins are
listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of
Review’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective July 12, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement &
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3147.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On March 7, 2017, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the 2014–2016 AR
of the antidumping duty order on
certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic
products from the PRC.1 For events
subsequent to the Preliminary Results,
1 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2014–2016, 82 FR
12793 (March 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results) and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
(PDM).
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32169-32170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14610]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-201-842]
Large Residential Washers From Mexico: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 6, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the third administrative review of
the antidumping duty (AD) order on large residential washers (LRWs)
from Mexico. The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2015, to January
31, 2016. Based on our analysis of the comments received and our
verification findings, we made certain changes in the margin
calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the preliminary
results. The final weighted-average dumping margin for the respondent,
Electrolux Home Products Corp. N.V. and Electrolux Home Products de
Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Electrolux \1\), is listed below in
the section entitled ``Final Results of the Review.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We inadvertently included Electrolux Home Products, Inc. as
a producer/exporter of subject merchandise in our preliminary
results. See Large Residential Washers from Mexico: Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82
FR 12538 (March 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum (PDM) at 1. However,
Electrolux Home Products, Inc. is the U.S. affiliate of Electrolux.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective July 12, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross Belliveau or Rebecca Janz, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4952 or (202) 482-2972,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise:
Electrolux. On March 6, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary
Results.\2\ In April 2017, the Department verified the sales data
reported by Electrolux, in accordance with section 782(i) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In May 2017, we received case briefs from Whirlpool Corporation
(the petitioner) and Electrolux. In June 2017, we received a rebuttal
brief from the petitioner.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are all large residential washers
and certain subassemblies thereof from Mexico. The products are
currently classifiable under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 8450.20.0080
of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Products
subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this
scope is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in
Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large Residential
Washers from Mexico,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs by parties are listed in the
Appendix to this notice and addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. Parties can find a complete discussion of these issues and
the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov; the
Issues and Decision Memorandum is also available to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024, of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the
electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical
in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on comments received from interested parties regarding our
Preliminary Results and our findings at verification, we made certain
changes to the preliminary calculation of weighted-average dumping
margin calculations for Electrolux.
Final Results of the Review
We are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margin to
Electrolux:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electrolux Home Products Corp. NV/Electrolux Home Products 3.67
de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.....................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days
of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Duty Assessment
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), the
[[Page 32170]]
Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The Department intends to issue
appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 41 days after
publication of the final results of this administrative review.
For Electrolux, the Department calculated an ad valorem importer-
specific assessment rate equal to the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered
value of those sales. Where an importer-specific assessment rate is
zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate these entries without regard to antidumping
duties pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
The Department's ``automatic assessment'' practice will apply to
entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Electrolux,
for which the company did not know that its merchandise was destined
for the United States.\4\ In such instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate established in the
less-than fair-value (LTFV) investigation (i.e., 36.52 percent),\5\ if
there is no rate for the intermediary company(ies) involved in the
transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) for a
full discussion of this practice.
\5\ See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and the Republic
of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate
for Electrolux will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this
administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently-completed segment; (3) if the exporter
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate established for the most recently-completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to
be 36.52 percent, the all-others rate determined in the LTFV
investigation.\6\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5) of the
Department's regulations.
Dated: July 5, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Margin Calculations
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1. The Department's Use of Zeroing
Comment 2. Methodological Issues in the Differential Pricing
Analysis
Comment 3. Calculation Errors in Electrolux's Margin Program
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017-14610 Filed 7-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P