Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 31750-31752 [2017-14384]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
31750
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 130
Monday, July 10, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
Notice of Petitions by Firms for
Determination of Eligibility To Apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance
Economic Development
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
AGENCY:
Notice and opportunity for
public comment.
ACTION:
Pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade
Act 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341
et seq.), the Economic Development
Administration (EDA) has received
petitions for certification of eligibility to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
from the firms listed below.
Accordingly, EDA has initiated
investigations to determine whether
increased imports into the United States
of articles like or directly competitive
with those produced by each of these
firms contributed importantly to the
total or partial separation of the firm’s
workers, or threat thereof, and to a
decrease in sales or production of each
petitioning firm.
LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE
[5/26/2017 through 7/3/2017]
Firm name
Date accepted
for
investigation
Firm address
Flinchbaugh Engineering, Inc .........
4387 Run Way, York, PA 17406
6/19/2017
Nickson Industries, Inc ...................
336 Woodford Avenue, Plainville,
CT 06062.
6/20/2017
Machine Tech, Inc ..........................
203 Lacarpe Circle, Houma, LA
70360.
6/27/2017
Mid Star Lab, Inc ............................
1701
Commerce
Road,
Tonganoxie, KS 66086.
36 Precision Drive, North Springfield, VT 05150.
6/28/2017
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Acrylic Designs, Inc ........................
Any party having a substantial
interest in these proceedings may
request a public hearing on the matter.
A written request for a hearing must be
submitted to the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Firms Division, Room
71030, Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no
later than ten (10) calendar days
following publication of this notice.
Please follow the requirements set
forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR
315.9 for procedures to request a public
hearing. The Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance official number
and title for the program under which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
6/29/2017
Product(s)
The firm manufactures various engine and transmission components for heavy equipment.
The firm manufactures exhaust hardware and accessories (clamps, tubing products, flexible
pipes, hangers, gaskets, saddles, u-bolts, fasteners, washers, and hanger/gasket components).
The firm manufactures custom CNC parts for industrial use including flanges, winches, jacks,
hoists, sprockets, and pully tackles.
The firm manufactures customized orthopedic
shoes.
The firm manufactures counter boxes and floor
display cases.
these petitions are submitted is 11.313,
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms.
Miriam Kearse,
Lead Program Analyst.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–870]
[FR Doc. 2017–14388 Filed 7–7–17; 8:45 am]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
From the Republic of Korea: Amended
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2014–2015
BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P
PO 00000
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is amending its final
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from
AGENCY:
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 130 / Monday, July 10, 2017 / Notices
the Republic of Korea (Korea). The
period of review (POR) is July 18, 2014
through August 31, 2015. The amended
final weighted-average dumping
margins are listed below in the section
entitled, ‘‘Amended Final Results.’’
DATES:
Effective July 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Scott or Victoria Cho, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2657 or (202) 482–5075,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 17, 2017, the Department
published the Final Results of the 2014–
2015 administrative review in the
Federal Register.1 On April 18, 2017,
petitioner Maverick Tube Corporation
(Maverick) and respondent NEXTEEL
Co., Ltd. (NEXTEEL) timely filed
ministerial error allegations concerning
the Final Results and requested,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224, that the
Department correct the alleged
ministerial errors. On April 24, 2017,
both Maverick and NEXTEEL submitted
rebuttal comments.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is certain OCTG, which are hollow steel
products of circular cross-section,
including oil well casing and tubing, of
iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both
carbon and alloy), whether seamless or
welded, regardless of end finish (e.g.,
whether or not plain end, threaded, or
threaded and coupled) whether or not
conforming to American Petroleum
Institute (API) or non-API
specifications, whether finished
(including limited service OCTG
products) or unfinished (including
green tubes and limited service OCTG
products), whether or not thread
protectors are attached. The scope of the
order also covers OCTG coupling stock.2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
1 See
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the
Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 82 FR
18105 (April 17, 2017) (Final Results), and
accompanying Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014–
2015 Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated April 10, 2017
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
2 A full written description of the scope of the
order is contained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The Department is not making any
changes to the scope of the order for these amended
final results.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
31751
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise covered by this review.
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these
amended final results in the Federal
Register.
Where the respondent reported
reliable entered values, we calculated
importer- (or customer-) specific ad
valorem rates by aggregating the
dumping margins calculated for all U.S.
sales to each importer (or customer) and
dividing this amount by the total
entered value of the sales to each
importer (or customer).8 Where the
Department calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin by dividing the
total amount of dumping for reviewed
sales to that party by the total sales
quantity associated with those
transactions, the Department will direct
CBP to assess importer- (or customer-)
specific assessment rates based on the
resulting per-unit rates.9 Where an
importer- (or customer-) specific ad
valorem or per-unit rate is greater than
de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the
Department will instruct CBP to collect
the appropriate duties at the time of
liquidation.10 Where an importer- (or
customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is zero or de minimis, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.11
For the companies which were not
selected for individual examination, we
Weightedwill assign an assessment rate based on
average
Exporter or producer
dumping
the methodology described in the
margin
section ‘‘Amended Final Results,’’
(percent)
above.
Consistent with the Department’s
NEXTEEL Co., Ltd ...............
29.76
Non-examined companies 7 ..
16.26 assessment practice, for entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by SeAH, NEXTEEL, or the
Disclosure
non-examined companies for which the
The Department intends to disclose
producer did not know that its
the calculations performed for these
merchandise was destined for the
amended final results of review within
United States, we will instruct CBP to
five days of the date of publication of
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allthis notice in the Federal Register, in
others rate if there is no rate for the
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.12
Assessment Rates
Amended Final Results
Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), defines
‘‘ministerial errors’’ as including ‘‘errors
in addition, subtraction, or other
arithmetic function, clerical errors
resulting from inaccurate copying,
duplication, or the like, and any other
type of unintentional error which the
administering authority considers
ministerial.’’ 3 After analyzing parties’
comments, we have determined, in
accordance with section 751(h) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), that we
made certain ministerial errors in the
Final Results with respect to our
treatment of certain sales expenses for
NEXTEEL.4 For a detailed discussion of
these ministerial errors, as well as the
Department’s analysis of these errors,
see the Ministerial Error Memorandum.
In accordance with section 751(h) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are
amending the Final Results of this
administrative review of OCTG from
Korea. The rate for the companies not
selected for individual examination is
equal to the simple average 5 of the
weighted-average dumping margin
calculated for NEXTEEL in these
amended final results and the weigthedaverage dumping margin calculated for
respondent SeAH Steel Corporation
(SeAH) (i.e., 2.76 percent) in the Final
Results.6 The dumping margins
calculated for these amended final
results are as follows:
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department shall determine, and CBP
3 See
4 See
also 19 CFR 351.224(f).
Ministerial Error Memorandum at Comment
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective
retroactively for all shipments of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
2.
5 We calculated the rate for the companies not
selected for individual examination using a simple
average of the dumping margins calculated for the
mandatory respondents because complete publicly
ranged sales data were not available. See Final
Results, 82 FR at 18106.
6 Id.
7 See Appendix I for a full list of these companies.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8 See
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
9 Id.
10 Id.
11 See
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
12 For
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
31752
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 130 / Monday, July 10, 2017 / Notices
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the April 17, 2017, the date of
publication of the Final Results of this
administrative review, as provided for
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rates for the
companies listed in these amended final
results will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margins established in
the section ‘‘Amended Final Results,’’
above; (2) for merchandise exported by
producers or exporters not covered in
this review but covered in a prior
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment in
which the company was reviewed; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the
producer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the producer of the subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be 5.24 percent,13 the
all-others rate established in the LTFV
investigation. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Interested Parties
Regarding Administrative Protective
Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
13 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not
in Harmony With Final Determination, 81 FR 59603
(August 30, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jul 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
These amended final results and
notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(h) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Dated: July 3, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
User Fees for Export and Investment
Promotion Services/Events
Appendix I—List of Companies Not
Individually Examined
International Trade Administration
[Docket No.: 161020988–6988–02]
RIN 0625–XC026
International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of implementation of
user fees.
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
The International Trade
Administration (ITA) solicited public
feedback on its proposal to adjust export
and investment promotion user fees in
light of an independent cost study
which concluded that ITA is not fully
covering its costs for providing services
under the current fee structure. Federal
agencies are directed by Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A–25 to ensure they recoup
their costs when providing certain
services. ITA provides a wide range of
export and investment promotion
information and services to U.S.
individuals and entities. The services
announced here assist U.S. individuals
and entities with their exporting needs
and help attract foreign direct
investment. These services are a subset
of ITA activities that involve relatively
more intensive time engagements with
particular client firms. ITA will
continue to provide information and
services that are less intensive and/or
benefit the general public without
charge. In response to public feedback,
amendments have been made to the
proposed adjusted user fees. As part of
this announcement, ITA announces the
final user fees schedule and revised
standards related to company size for
determining the fees to be charged.
DATES: The user fees schedule will be
effective on October 1, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Aditi Palli, International Trade
Administration, Office of Strategic
Planning, 1400 Constitution Avenue
NW., Rm. 21022, Washington, DC
20230, Phone: (202) 482–2025.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
14 On September 21, 2016, the Department
published the final results of a changed
circumstances review with respect to OCTG from
Korea, finding that Hyundai Steel is the successorin-interest to Hyundai HYSCO for purposes of
determining antidumping duty cash deposits and
liabilities. See Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of
Korea, 81 FR 64873 (September 21, 2016). Hyundai
Steel Company is also known as Hyundai Steel
Corporation and Hyundai Steel Co. Ltd.
Background
OMB Circular A–25 requires the
recovery of an appropriate share of the
full cost through user fees for goods and
services provided to recipients of
benefits beyond those accruing to the
general public. Specifically, section 6 of
Circular A–25 states that ‘‘when a
service (or privilege) provides special
benefits to an identifiable recipient
A.R. Williams Materials
AJU Besteel Co., Ltd.
AK Steel
BDP International
Cantak Corporation
Daewoo International Corporation
Dong-A Steel Co., Ltd.
Dong Yang Steel Pipe
Dongbu Incheon Steel
Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.
Dongkuk S and C
DSEC
EEW Korea
Erndtebruecker Eisenwerk and Company
GS Global
H K Steel
Hansol Metal
HG Tubulars Canada Ltd.
Husteel Co., Ltd.
Hyundai HYSCO 14
Hyundai HYSCO Co., Ltd.
Hyundai Steel Company
Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd.
ILJIN Steel Corporation
Kukbo Logix
Kukje Steel
Kumkang Industrial Co., Ltd.
McJunkin Red Man Tubular
NEXTEEL Q&T
Nippon Arwwl and Aumikin Vuaan Korea
Co., Ltd.
Phocennee
POSCO Processing and Acy Service
Samson
Sedae Entertech
Steel Canada
Steel Flower
Steelpia
Sung Jin
TGS Pipe
Toyota Tsusho Corporation
UNI Global Logistics
Yonghyun Base Materials
[FR Doc. 2017–14384 Filed 7–7–17; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 130 (Monday, July 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31750-31752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14384]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-870]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Korea:
Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-
2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is amending its
final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty
order on certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from
[[Page 31751]]
the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is July 18,
2014 through August 31, 2015. The amended final weighted-average
dumping margins are listed below in the section entitled, ``Amended
Final Results.''
DATES: Effective July 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Scott or Victoria Cho, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2657 or (202) 482-5075,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 17, 2017, the Department published the Final Results of
the 2014-2015 administrative review in the Federal Register.\1\ On
April 18, 2017, petitioner Maverick Tube Corporation (Maverick) and
respondent NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. (NEXTEEL) timely filed ministerial error
allegations concerning the Final Results and requested, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.224, that the Department correct the alleged ministerial
errors. On April 24, 2017, both Maverick and NEXTEEL submitted rebuttal
comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of
Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2014-2015, 82 FR 18105 (April 17, 2017) (Final Results), and
accompanying Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the 2014-2015 Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the
Republic of Korea,'' dated April 10, 2017 (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is certain OCTG, which are
hollow steel products of circular cross-section, including oil well
casing and tubing, of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both carbon
and alloy), whether seamless or welded, regardless of end finish (e.g.,
whether or not plain end, threaded, or threaded and coupled) whether or
not conforming to American Petroleum Institute (API) or non-API
specifications, whether finished (including limited service OCTG
products) or unfinished (including green tubes and limited service OCTG
products), whether or not thread protectors are attached. The scope of
the order also covers OCTG coupling stock.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A full written description of the scope of the order is
contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Department is
not making any changes to the scope of the order for these amended
final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results
Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
defines ``ministerial errors'' as including ``errors in addition,
subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting
from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type
of unintentional error which the administering authority considers
ministerial.'' \3\ After analyzing parties' comments, we have
determined, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(f), that we made certain ministerial errors in the Final
Results with respect to our treatment of certain sales expenses for
NEXTEEL.\4\ For a detailed discussion of these ministerial errors, as
well as the Department's analysis of these errors, see the Ministerial
Error Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See also 19 CFR 351.224(f).
\4\ See Ministerial Error Memorandum at Comment 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e),
we are amending the Final Results of this administrative review of OCTG
from Korea. The rate for the companies not selected for individual
examination is equal to the simple average \5\ of the weighted-average
dumping margin calculated for NEXTEEL in these amended final results
and the weigthed-average dumping margin calculated for respondent SeAH
Steel Corporation (SeAH) (i.e., 2.76 percent) in the Final Results.\6\
The dumping margins calculated for these amended final results are as
follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ We calculated the rate for the companies not selected for
individual examination using a simple average of the dumping margins
calculated for the mandatory respondents because complete publicly
ranged sales data were not available. See Final Results, 82 FR at
18106.
\6\ Id.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter or producer dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEXTEEL Co., Ltd........................................ 29.76
Non-examined companies \7\.............................. 16.26
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Appendix I for a full list of these companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to disclose the calculations performed for
these amended final results of review within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise covered by
this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to
CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these amended final
results in the Federal Register.
Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, we
calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by
aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each
importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered
value of the sales to each importer (or customer).\8\ Where the
Department calculated a weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the
total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total
sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will
direct CBP to assess importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates
based on the resulting per-unit rates.\9\ Where an importer- (or
customer-) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de
minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will instruct CBP to
collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation.\10\ Where an
importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is zero
or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\9\ Id.
\10\ Id.
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies which were not selected for individual
examination, we will assign an assessment rate based on the methodology
described in the section ``Amended Final Results,'' above.
Consistent with the Department's assessment practice, for entries
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by SeAH, NEXTEEL, or the
non-examined companies for which the producer did not know that its
merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate
for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective
retroactively for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn
[[Page 31752]]
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the April 17, 2017, the
date of publication of the Final Results of this administrative review,
as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rates for the companies listed in these amended final results
will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margins established in
the section ``Amended Final Results,'' above; (2) for merchandise
exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment in which the company was reviewed; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or the original less-
than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the producer is, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will continue to be 5.24 percent,\13\ the all-others rate
established in the LTFV investigation. These cash deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of
Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final
Determination, 81 FR 59603 (August 30, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties Regarding Administrative Protective
Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding.
Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
These amended final results and notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(e).
Dated: July 3, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--List of Companies Not Individually Examined
A.R. Williams Materials
AJU Besteel Co., Ltd.
AK Steel
BDP International
Cantak Corporation
Daewoo International Corporation
Dong-A Steel Co., Ltd.
Dong Yang Steel Pipe
Dongbu Incheon Steel
Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.
Dongkuk S and C
DSEC
EEW Korea
Erndtebruecker Eisenwerk and Company
GS Global
H K Steel
Hansol Metal
HG Tubulars Canada Ltd.
Husteel Co., Ltd.
Hyundai HYSCO \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ On September 21, 2016, the Department published the final
results of a changed circumstances review with respect to OCTG from
Korea, finding that Hyundai Steel is the successor-in-interest to
Hyundai HYSCO for purposes of determining antidumping duty cash
deposits and liabilities. See Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Oil Country Tubular Goods from
the Republic of Korea, 81 FR 64873 (September 21, 2016). Hyundai
Steel Company is also known as Hyundai Steel Corporation and Hyundai
Steel Co. Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyundai HYSCO Co., Ltd.
Hyundai Steel Company
Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd.
ILJIN Steel Corporation
Kukbo Logix
Kukje Steel
Kumkang Industrial Co., Ltd.
McJunkin Red Man Tubular
NEXTEEL Q&T
Nippon Arwwl and Aumikin Vuaan Korea Co., Ltd.
Phocennee
POSCO Processing and Acy Service
Samson
Sedae Entertech
Steel Canada
Steel Flower
Steelpia
Sung Jin
TGS Pipe
Toyota Tsusho Corporation
UNI Global Logistics
Yonghyun Base Materials
[FR Doc. 2017-14384 Filed 7-7-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
