Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 3, To Amend Section 102.01B of the NYSE Listed Company Manual To Modify the Requirements That Apply to Companies That List Without a Prior Exchange Act Registration and That Are Not Listing in Connection With an Underwritten Initial Public Offering, 29347-29348 [2017-13488]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 28, 2017 / Notices
Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC
(Westinghouse), addresses Optimized
ZIRLOTM and demonstrates that
Optimized ZIRLOTM has essentially the
same properties as currently licensed
ZIRLO®. The fuel cladding itself is not
an accident initiator and does not affect
accident probability.
2. Does the proposed exemption
create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
Use of Optimized ZIRLOTM clad fuel
will not result in changes in the
operation or configuration of the
facility. Topical Report WCAP–12610–
P–A & CENPD–404–P–A, Addendum 1–
A, demonstrated that the material
properties of Optimized ZIRLOTM are
similar to those of standard ZIRLO®,
thus precluding the possibility of the
fuel cladding becoming an accident
initiator and causing a new or different
type of accident. Therefore, the
proposed change does not create the
possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any previously evaluated.
3. Does the proposed exemption
involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety?
Response: No.
The proposed change will not involve
a significant reduction in the margin of
safety. Topical Report WCAP–12610–P–
A & CENPD–404–P–A, Addendum 1–A,
demonstrated that the material
properties of the Optimized ZIRLOTM
are not significantly different from those
of standard ZIRLO®. Optimized
ZIRLOTM is expected to perform
similarly to standard ZIRLO® for all
normal operating and accident
scenarios, including both loss of coolant
accident LOCA) and non-LOCA
scenarios. For LOCA scenarios, where
the slight difference is Optimized
ZIRLOTM material properties relative to
standard ZIRLO® could have some
impact on the overall accident scenario,
plant-specific LOCA analyses using
Optimized ZIRLOTM properties will
demonstrate that the acceptance criteria
of 10 CFR 50.46 have been satisfied.
Therefore, the proposed change does not
involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety.
Based on the above, the NRC staff
concludes that the proposed exemption
presents no significant hazards
consideration under the standards set
forth in § 50.92(c), and, accordingly, a
finding of no significant hazards
consideration is justified (i.e., satisfies
the provisions of § 51.22(c)(9)(i)).
cladding material at Ginna. Optimized
ZIRLOTM has essentially the same
properties are currently licensed
ZIRLO®. The use of Optimized ZIRLOTM
fuel rod cladding material will not
significantly change the types of
effluents that may be released offsite or
significantly increase the amount of
effluents that may be released offsite.
Therefore, the provisions of
§ 51.22(c)(9)(ii) are satisfied.
Requirements in § 51.22(c)(9)(ii)
The proposed exemption would allow
the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Jun 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
Requirements in § 51.22(c)(9)(iii)
The proposed exemption would allow
the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod
cladding material at Ginna. Optimized
ZIRLOTM has essentially the same
properties are currently licensed
ZIRLO®. The use of Optimized ZIRLOTM
fuel rod cladding material at Ginna will
not significantly increase individual
occupational radiation exposure or
significantly increase cumulative
occupational radiation exposure.
Therefore, the provisions of
§ 51.22(c)(9)(iii) are satisfied.
Conclusion
Based on the above, the NRC staff
concludes that the proposed exemption
meets the eligibility criteria for the
categorical exclusion set forth in
§ 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, in accordance
with § 51.22(b), no environmental
impact statement or environmental
assessment need to be prepared in
connection with the NRC’s proposed
issuance of this exemption.
IV. Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to § 50.12, the
exemption is authorized by law, will not
present an undue risk to the public
health and safety, and is consistent with
the common defense and security. Also,
special circumstances are present.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants Exelon an exemption from certain
requirements of § 50.46 and 10 CFR part
50, appendix K, to allow the use of
Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding
material at Ginna.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day
of June 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
MaryJane Ross-Lee,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2017–13517 Filed 6–27–17; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
29347
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–81000; File No. SR–NYSE–
2017–12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 3, To Amend Section 102.01B of
the NYSE Listed Company Manual To
Modify the Requirements That Apply to
Companies That List Without a Prior
Exchange Act Registration and That
Are Not Listing in Connection With an
Underwritten Initial Public Offering
June 22, 2017.
On March 13, 2017, the New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend Section 102.01B of the Manual to
modify the provisions relating to the
qualification of companies listing
without a prior Exchange Act
registration and an underwritten
offering to permit the listing of such
companies immediately upon
effectiveness of an Exchange Act
registration statement without a
concurrent public offering registered
under the Securities Act of 1933
provided the company meets all other
listing requirements. The proposal also
would eliminate the requirement to
have a private placement market trading
price if there is a valuation from an
independent third-party of $250 million
in market value of publicly-held shares.
The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on March 31, 2017.3 The
Commission received no comments on
the proposed rule change. On May 12,
2017, the Commission extended the
time period within which to approve
the proposed rule change, disapprove
the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change to June 29, 2017.4 On June
6, 2017, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 3 to the proposed rule change.5
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
80313 (March 27, 2017), 82 FR 16082 (March 31,
2017).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
80670 (May 12, 2017), 82 FR 22866 (May 18, 2017).
5 The Exchange also filed Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change on May 16, 2017 and
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change on
2 17
Continued
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
29348
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 28, 2017 / Notices
On June 19, 2017, the Exchange
withdrew the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 3. (SR–
NYSE–2017–12).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[FR Doc. 2017–13488 Filed 6–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–80997; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2017–060]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule
7014(j)
June 22, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 9,
2017, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange.3 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 7014(j) to provide a second credit
tier under the Nasdaq Growth Program.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
May 24, 2017, both of which were subsequently
withdrawn.
6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The Commission notes that Nasdaq initially
filed this proposal as SR–NASDAQ–2017–057 on
June 1, 2017. On June 9, 2017, Nasdaq withdrew
that filing and replaced it with this filing.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Jun 27, 2017
Jkt 241001
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend Rule 7014(j) to
provide a second credit tier under the
Nasdaq Growth Program (‘‘Program’’).
Nasdaq introduced the Program in
2016.4 The purpose of the Program is to
provide a credit per share executed for
members that meet certain growth
criteria. The credit is designed to
provide an incentive to members that do
not qualify for other credits under Rule
7018 in excess of the Program credit to
increase their participation on the
Exchange. The Program provides a
member a $0.0025 per share executed
credit in securities priced $1 or more
per share if the member meets certain
criteria. The credit is provided in lieu of
other credits provided to the member for
displayed quotes/orders (other than
Supplemental Orders or Designated
Retail Orders) that provide liquidity
under Rule 7018, if the credit under the
Nasdaq Growth Program is greater than
the credit attained under Rule 7018.
Rule 7014(j) currently provides three
ways in which a member may qualify
for the Program in a given month. First,
the member may qualify for the Program
by: (i) Adding greater than 750,000
shares a day on average during the
month through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs; and (ii)
increasing its shares of liquidity
provided through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a
percent of Consolidated Volume by 20%
versus the member’s Growth Baseline.5
Second, the member may qualify for the
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78977
(September 29, 2016), 81 FR 69140 (October 5,
2016) (SR–NASDAQ–2016–132).
5 The Growth Baseline is defined as the member’s
shares of liquidity provided in all securities through
one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as
a percent of Consolidated Volume during the last
month a member qualified for the Nasdaq Growth
Program under current Rule 7014(j)(ii)(A)
(increasing its Consolidated Volume by 20% versus
its Growth Baseline). If a member has not yet
qualified for a credit under this program, its August
2016 share of liquidity provided in all securities
through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center
MPIDs as a percent of Consolidated Volume will be
used to establish a baseline.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Program by: (i) Adding greater than
750,000 shares a day on average during
the month through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs; and (ii)
meeting the criteria set forth above
(increasing its shares of liquidity
provided through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a
percent of Consolidated Volume by 20%
versus the member’s Growth Baseline)
in the preceding month, and
maintaining or increasing its shares of
liquidity provided through one or more
of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a
percent of Consolidated Volume as
compared to the preceding month.
Third, a member may qualify for the
Program by: (i) Adding greater than
750,000 shares a day on average during
the month through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs in three
separate months; (ii) increasing its
shares of liquidity provided through one
or more of its Nasdaq Market Center
MPIDs as a percent of Consolidated
Volume by 20% versus the member’s
Growth Baseline in three separate
months; and (iii) maintaining or
increasing its shares of liquidity
provided through one or more of its
Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs as a
percent of Consolidated Volume
compared to the growth baseline
established when the member met the
criteria for the third month.
The Exchange is proposing to amend
Rule 7014(j) to provide a second credit
tier under the Program.6 Specifically,
the Exchange is proposing a $0.0027 per
share executed rebate in lieu of the
current $0.0025 rebate. To qualify for
the new rebate, a member must: (i) Add
at least 0.04% or more [sic] of
Consolidated Volume during the month
through non-displayed orders on one or
more of its Nasdaq Market Center
MPIDs; and (ii) increase its shares of
liquidity provided through one or more
of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs in
all securities during the month as a
percent of Consolidated Volume by 50%
versus its August 2016 share of liquidity
provided in all securities through one or
more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs
as a percent of Consolidated Volume.
Thus, the first requirement of the new
tier requires a member to provide a
significant level of Consolidated
Volume through non-displayed 7 orders,
which generally provide improvement
to the size of orders executed on the
6 The Exchange is also proposing to renumber
current Rule 7014(j) to account for the new credit
tier and make [sic] consistent with the numbering
convention used under Rule 7014.
7 Non-displayed orders are not displayed to other
Participants, but nevertheless remain available for
potential execution against incoming Orders until
executed in full or cancelled. See Rule 4702(b)(3).
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29347-29348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13488]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-81000; File No. SR-NYSE-2017-12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 3, To Amend Section 102.01B of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual To Modify the Requirements That Apply to Companies That List
Without a Prior Exchange Act Registration and That Are Not Listing in
Connection With an Underwritten Initial Public Offering
June 22, 2017.
On March 13, 2017, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Section 102.01B of the Manual to modify
the provisions relating to the qualification of companies listing
without a prior Exchange Act registration and an underwritten offering
to permit the listing of such companies immediately upon effectiveness
of an Exchange Act registration statement without a concurrent public
offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933 provided the
company meets all other listing requirements. The proposal also would
eliminate the requirement to have a private placement market trading
price if there is a valuation from an independent third-party of $250
million in market value of publicly-held shares. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 31,
2017.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the proposed rule
change. On May 12, 2017, the Commission extended the time period within
which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule
change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change to June 29, 2017.\4\ On June 6,
2017, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule
change.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-80313 (March 27,
2017), 82 FR 16082 (March 31, 2017).
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-80670 (May 12,
2017), 82 FR 22866 (May 18, 2017).
\5\ The Exchange also filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change on May 16, 2017 and Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change on May 24, 2017, both of which were subsequently withdrawn.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 29348]]
On June 19, 2017, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
as modified by Amendment No. 3. (SR-NYSE-2017-12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-13488 Filed 6-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P