Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order, 28640-28641 [2017-13136]

Download as PDF 28640 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2017 / Notices Exporter The Department has refined its assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by Dongyuan or Yingao, the Department 1.68 will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In 1.78 addition, because the Department determined that New Shichu had no 1.78 shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries of subject 1.78 merchandise from New Shichu will be 3 1.78 liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. Weightedaverage dumping margins (percent) asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co. Ltd. ............... Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd.* ........................... Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd.* ................. KaiPing Dawn Plumbing Products, Co., Ltd.* ........... Nigbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd.* ........................... Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd.* ................... Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd.* .................. Zhuhai KOHLER Kitchen & Bathroom Products, Co., Ltd.* ................................... Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit 1.78 requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments 1.78 of the subject merchandise from the PRC * This company demonstrated that it quali- entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, fied for a separate rate in this administrative for consumption on or after the review. We assigned this company a rate publication date, as provided for by which is the average of the weighted-average section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For dumping margins assigned to Dongyuan and Yingao. See the Preliminary Results and the the companies listed above that have a accompanying Preliminary Decision separate rate, the cash deposit rate will Memorandum. be that rate established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate Assessment Rates is zero or de minimis, then a cash Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the deposit rate of zero will be established Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the for that company); (2) for previously Department determined, and U.S. investigated or reviewed PRC and nonCustoms and Border Protection (CBP) PRC exporters that received a separate shall assess, antidumping duties on all rate in a prior segment of this appropriate entries of subject proceeding, the cash deposit rate will merchandise in accordance with the continue to be the existing exporterfinal results of this review. The specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of Department intends to issue appropriate subject merchandise that have not been assessment instructions directly to CBP found to be entitled to a separate rate, 15 days after publication of the final the cash deposit rate will be the rate for results of this administrative review. the PRC-wide entity, which is 76.45 For Dongyuan and Yingao, which percent; and (4) for all non-PRC have above weighted-average dumping exporters of subject merchandise which margins above zero or de minimis (i.e., have not received their own rate, the less than 0.5 percent), we calculated cash deposit rate will be the rate importer- (or customer-) specific perapplicable to the PRC exporter(s) that unit duty assessment rates based on the supplied that non-PRC exporter. These ratio of the total amount of dumping deposit requirements, when imposed, calculated for the importer’s (or shall remain in effect until further customer’s) examined sales to the total notice. sales quantity associated with those Notification to Importers sales, in accordance with 19 CFR This notice serves as the only 351.212(b)(1). Where either the respondents’ weighted-average dumping reminder to importers of their responsibility, under 19 CFR margin is zero or de minimis, or an 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate importer-(or customer-) specific regarding the reimbursement of assessment rate is zero or de minimis, antidumping duties prior to liquidation we will instruct CBP to liquidate the of the relevant entries during this appropriate entries without regard to review period. Failure to comply with antidumping duties. this requirement could result in the For the respondents which were not Secretary’s presumption that selected for individual examination in reimbursement of antidumping duties this administrative review and which qualified for a separate rate, the 3 For a full discussion of this practice, see Nonassessment rate is equal to the average Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: of the weighted-average dumping Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 margins assigned to Dongyuan and (October 24, 2011) (NME Antidumping Yingao, or 1.78 percent. Proceedings). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:21 Jun 22, 2017 1.78 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: June 19, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2017–13121 Filed 6–22–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–808] Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain stainless steel wire rods (wire rods) from India would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of continuation of the antidumping duty order. AGENCY: DATES: Effective June 23, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andre Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–2201. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2017 / Notices Background On December 1, 1993, the Department published the AD order on wire rods from India.1 On December 1, 2016, the Department published the notice of initiation of the fourth sunset review of the antidumping duty order on wire rods from India, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On December 1, 2016, the ITC instituted its review of the antidumping duty order on wire rods from India.3 As a result of this sunset review, the Department determined that revocation of the antidumping duty order on wire rods from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail should the order be revoked.4 On June 6, 2017, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, the ITC determined that revocation of the antidumping duty order on wire rods from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.5 asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the antidumping duty order is certain stainless steel wire rods from India, which are hot-rolled or hot-rolled annealed and/or pickled rounds, squares, octagons, hexagons or other shapes, in coils. Wire rods are made of alloy steels containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more of chromium, with or without other elements. These products are only manufactured by hot-rolling and are normally sold in coiled form, and are of solid cross section. The majority of wire rods sold in the United States are round in cross-section shape, annealed, and pickled. The most common size is 5.5 millimeters in diameter. The wire rods subject to this order are currently classifiable under subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0017, 1 Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India, 58 FR 63335 (December 1, 1993). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 81 FR 86697 (December 1, 2016). 3 See Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India; Institution of a Five-Year Review, 81 FR 86728 (December 1, 2016). 4 See Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 16795 (April 6, 2017). 5 See Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India, 82 FR 26943 (June 12, 2017), and ITC Publication entitled Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Investigation No. 731–TA–638 (Fourth Review) (June 2017). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:21 Jun 22, 2017 Jkt 241001 7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and 7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).6 Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive. Continuation of the Order As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of the antidumping duty order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping duty order on wire rods from India. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect antidumping duty cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of this order will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of the order not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. This five-year sunset review and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: June 19, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2017–13136 Filed 6–22–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 6 The merchandise subject to the scope of this order was originally classifiable under all of the following HTS subheadings: 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0020, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0045, 7221.00.0060, 7221.00.0075, and 7221.00.0080. HTSUS subheadings 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0020, 7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0060, and 7221.00.0080, no longer exist. PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 28641 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–874; C–570–059] Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel From India and the People’s Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations of Countervailing Duty Investigations Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective June 23, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Mullen at (202) 482–5620 (India); Mandy Mallott and Alex Rosen, (202) 482–6430 and (202) 482–7814, respectively (the People’s Republic of China), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On May 9, 2017, the Department of Commerce (Department) initiated countervailing duty (CVD) investigations on certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel (cold-drawn mechanical tubing) from India and the People’s Republic of China (PRC).1 The notice of initiation stated that, in accordance with section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), we would issue our preliminary determinations no later than 65 days after the date of initiation, unless postponed.2 Currently, the preliminary determinations of these investigations are due no later than July 13, 2017. Postponement of Preliminary Determination Section 703(b)(1) of the Act requires the Department to issue the preliminary determination in a CVD investigation within 65 days after the date on which the Department initiated the investigation. However, if the petitioner makes a timely request for a postponement, section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act allows the Department to postpone, making the preliminary determination until no later than 130 days after the date on which the Department initiated the investigation. 1 See Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from India and the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations, 82 FR 22486 (May 16, 2017). 2 Id. E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 120 (Friday, June 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28640-28641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-808]


Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Continuation of 
Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of 
Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) 
that revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain stainless 
steel wire rods (wire rods) from India would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an 
industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of 
continuation of the antidumping duty order.

DATES: Effective June 23, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andre Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-2201.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

[[Page 28641]]

Background

    On December 1, 1993, the Department published the AD order on wire 
rods from India.\1\ On December 1, 2016, the Department published the 
notice of initiation of the fourth sunset review of the antidumping 
duty order on wire rods from India, pursuant to section 751(c) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\2\ On December 1, 2016, the 
ITC instituted its review of the antidumping duty order on wire rods 
from India.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods 
From India, 58 FR 63335 (December 1, 1993).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 81 FR 86697 
(December 1, 2016).
    \3\ See Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India; Institution of a 
Five-Year Review, 81 FR 86728 (December 1, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result of this sunset review, the Department determined that 
revocation of the antidumping duty order on wire rods from India would 
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and notified 
the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail should the 
order be revoked.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India: Final 
Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping 
Duty Order, 82 FR 16795 (April 6, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 6, 2017, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, 
the ITC determined that revocation of the antidumping duty order on 
wire rods from India would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India, 82 FR 26943 (June 
12, 2017), and ITC Publication entitled Stainless Steel Wire Rod 
From India: Investigation No. 731-TA-638 (Fourth Review) (June 
2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the antidumping duty order is certain 
stainless steel wire rods from India, which are hot-rolled or hot-
rolled annealed and/or pickled rounds, squares, octagons, hexagons or 
other shapes, in coils. Wire rods are made of alloy steels containing, 
by weight, 1.2 percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more of 
chromium, with or without other elements. These products are only 
manufactured by hot-rolling and are normally sold in coiled form, and 
are of solid cross section. The majority of wire rods sold in the 
United States are round in cross-section shape, annealed, and pickled. 
The most common size is 5.5 millimeters in diameter.
    The wire rods subject to this order are currently classifiable 
under subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 
7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and 7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).\6\ Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the merchandise subject to the order is 
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The merchandise subject to the scope of this order was 
originally classifiable under all of the following HTS subheadings: 
7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0020, 7221.00.0030, 
7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0045, 7221.00.0060, 7221.00.0075, and 
7221.00.0080. HTSUS subheadings 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0020, 
7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0060, and 7221.00.0080, no longer exist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuation of the Order

    As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC 
that revocation of the antidumping duty order would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an 
industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the 
Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping 
duty order on wire rods from India.
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect 
antidumping duty cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of 
entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of 
continuation of this order will be the date of publication in the 
Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 
751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-
year review of the order not later than 30 days prior to the fifth 
anniversary of the effective date of continuation.
    This five-year sunset review and this notice are in accordance with 
section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) 
of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).

    Dated: June 19, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017-13136 Filed 6-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P