Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order, 28640-28641 [2017-13136]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
28640
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2017 / Notices
Exporter
The Department has refined its
assessment practice in NME cases.
Pursuant to this refinement in practice,
for entries that were not reported in the
U.S. sales databases submitted by
Dongyuan or Yingao, the Department
1.68 will instruct CBP to liquidate such
entries at the PRC-wide rate. In
1.78 addition, because the Department
determined that New Shichu had no
1.78 shipments of the subject merchandise,
any suspended entries of subject
1.78
merchandise from New Shichu will be
3
1.78 liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.
Weightedaverage
dumping
margins
(percent)
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Guangdong Yingao Kitchen
Utensils Co. Ltd. ...............
Jiangmen Hongmao Trading
Co., Ltd.* ...........................
Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech
Enterprise Ltd.* .................
KaiPing Dawn Plumbing
Products, Co., Ltd.* ...........
Nigbo Afa Kitchen and Bath
Co., Ltd.* ...........................
Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd.* ...................
Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd.* ..................
Zhuhai KOHLER Kitchen &
Bathroom Products, Co.,
Ltd.* ...................................
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
1.78 requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
1.78 of the subject merchandise from the PRC
* This company demonstrated that it quali- entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
fied for a separate rate in this administrative for consumption on or after the
review. We assigned this company a rate publication date, as provided for by
which is the average of the weighted-average section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
dumping margins assigned to Dongyuan and
Yingao. See the Preliminary Results and the the companies listed above that have a
accompanying
Preliminary
Decision separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
Memorandum.
be that rate established in the final
results of this review (except, if the rate
Assessment Rates
is zero or de minimis, then a cash
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the deposit rate of zero will be established
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
for that company); (2) for previously
Department determined, and U.S.
investigated or reviewed PRC and nonCustoms and Border Protection (CBP)
PRC exporters that received a separate
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
rate in a prior segment of this
appropriate entries of subject
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
merchandise in accordance with the
continue to be the existing exporterfinal results of this review. The
specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of
Department intends to issue appropriate subject merchandise that have not been
assessment instructions directly to CBP
found to be entitled to a separate rate,
15 days after publication of the final
the cash deposit rate will be the rate for
results of this administrative review.
the PRC-wide entity, which is 76.45
For Dongyuan and Yingao, which
percent; and (4) for all non-PRC
have above weighted-average dumping
exporters of subject merchandise which
margins above zero or de minimis (i.e.,
have not received their own rate, the
less than 0.5 percent), we calculated
cash deposit rate will be the rate
importer- (or customer-) specific perapplicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
unit duty assessment rates based on the
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
ratio of the total amount of dumping
deposit requirements, when imposed,
calculated for the importer’s (or
shall remain in effect until further
customer’s) examined sales to the total
notice.
sales quantity associated with those
Notification to Importers
sales, in accordance with 19 CFR
This notice serves as the only
351.212(b)(1). Where either the
respondents’ weighted-average dumping reminder to importers of their
responsibility, under 19 CFR
margin is zero or de minimis, or an
351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate
importer-(or customer-) specific
regarding the reimbursement of
assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
of the relevant entries during this
appropriate entries without regard to
review period. Failure to comply with
antidumping duties.
this requirement could result in the
For the respondents which were not
Secretary’s presumption that
selected for individual examination in
reimbursement of antidumping duties
this administrative review and which
qualified for a separate rate, the
3 For a full discussion of this practice, see Nonassessment rate is equal to the average
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
of the weighted-average dumping
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
margins assigned to Dongyuan and
(October 24, 2011) (NME Antidumping
Yingao, or 1.78 percent.
Proceedings).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Jun 22, 2017
1.78
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: June 19, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017–13121 Filed 6–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–808]
Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rod From
India: Continuation of Antidumping
Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on certain stainless steel wire rods
(wire rods) from India would likely lead
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, the
Department is publishing a notice of
continuation of the antidumping duty
order.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective June 23, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andre Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–2201.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2017 / Notices
Background
On December 1, 1993, the Department
published the AD order on wire rods
from India.1 On December 1, 2016, the
Department published the notice of
initiation of the fourth sunset review of
the antidumping duty order on wire
rods from India, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).2 On December 1,
2016, the ITC instituted its review of the
antidumping duty order on wire rods
from India.3
As a result of this sunset review, the
Department determined that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on wire
rods from India would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping and notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail should the order be revoked.4
On June 6, 2017, pursuant to sections
751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, the ITC
determined that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on wire rods
from India would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.5
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the
antidumping duty order is certain
stainless steel wire rods from India,
which are hot-rolled or hot-rolled
annealed and/or pickled rounds,
squares, octagons, hexagons or other
shapes, in coils. Wire rods are made of
alloy steels containing, by weight, 1.2
percent or less of carbon and 10.5
percent or more of chromium, with or
without other elements. These products
are only manufactured by hot-rolling
and are normally sold in coiled form,
and are of solid cross section. The
majority of wire rods sold in the United
States are round in cross-section shape,
annealed, and pickled. The most
common size is 5.5 millimeters in
diameter.
The wire rods subject to this order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0017,
1 Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Stainless
Steel Wire Rods From India, 58 FR 63335
(December 1, 1993).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 81
FR 86697 (December 1, 2016).
3 See Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India;
Institution of a Five-Year Review, 81 FR 86728
(December 1, 2016).
4 See Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods From
India: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR
16795 (April 6, 2017).
5 See Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India, 82 FR
26943 (June 12, 2017), and ITC Publication entitled
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Investigation
No. 731–TA–638 (Fourth Review) (June 2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Jun 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030,
7221.00.0045, and 7221.00.0075 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS).6 Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to the order is dispositive.
Continuation of the Order
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order would likely lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping and material
injury to an industry in the United
States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of
the Act, the Department hereby orders
the continuation of the antidumping
duty order on wire rods from India.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
will continue to collect antidumping
duty cash deposits at the rates in effect
at the time of entry for all imports of
subject merchandise. The effective date
of continuation of this order will be the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of continuation.
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act,
the Department intends to initiate the
next five-year review of the order not
later than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
This five-year sunset review and this
notice are in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: June 19, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017–13136 Filed 6–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
6 The merchandise subject to the scope of this
order was originally classifiable under all of the
following HTS subheadings: 7221.00.0005,
7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0020, 7221.00.0030,
7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0045, 7221.00.0060,
7221.00.0075, and 7221.00.0080. HTSUS
subheadings 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0020,
7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0060, and 7221.00.0080, no
longer exist.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28641
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–874; C–570–059]
Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing
of Carbon and Alloy Steel From India
and the People’s Republic of China:
Postponement of Preliminary
Determinations of Countervailing Duty
Investigations
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective June 23, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Mullen at (202) 482–5620 (India);
Mandy Mallott and Alex Rosen, (202)
482–6430 and (202) 482–7814,
respectively (the People’s Republic of
China), AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On May 9, 2017, the Department of
Commerce (Department) initiated
countervailing duty (CVD)
investigations on certain cold-drawn
mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy
steel (cold-drawn mechanical tubing)
from India and the People’s Republic of
China (PRC).1 The notice of initiation
stated that, in accordance with section
703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.205(b)(1), we would issue our
preliminary determinations no later
than 65 days after the date of initiation,
unless postponed.2 Currently, the
preliminary determinations of these
investigations are due no later than July
13, 2017.
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
Section 703(b)(1) of the Act requires
the Department to issue the preliminary
determination in a CVD investigation
within 65 days after the date on which
the Department initiated the
investigation. However, if the petitioner
makes a timely request for a
postponement, section 703(c)(1)(A) of
the Act allows the Department to
postpone, making the preliminary
determination until no later than 130
days after the date on which the
Department initiated the investigation.
1 See Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of
Carbon and Alloy Steel from India and the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty
Investigations, 82 FR 22486 (May 16, 2017).
2 Id.
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 120 (Friday, June 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28640-28641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13136]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-808]
Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Continuation of
Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain stainless
steel wire rods (wire rods) from India would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of
continuation of the antidumping duty order.
DATES: Effective June 23, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andre Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-2201.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 28641]]
Background
On December 1, 1993, the Department published the AD order on wire
rods from India.\1\ On December 1, 2016, the Department published the
notice of initiation of the fourth sunset review of the antidumping
duty order on wire rods from India, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\2\ On December 1, 2016, the
ITC instituted its review of the antidumping duty order on wire rods
from India.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods
From India, 58 FR 63335 (December 1, 1993).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 81 FR 86697
(December 1, 2016).
\3\ See Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India; Institution of a
Five-Year Review, 81 FR 86728 (December 1, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a result of this sunset review, the Department determined that
revocation of the antidumping duty order on wire rods from India would
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and notified
the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail should the
order be revoked.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India: Final
Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order, 82 FR 16795 (April 6, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 6, 2017, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act,
the ITC determined that revocation of the antidumping duty order on
wire rods from India would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States
within a reasonably foreseeable time.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India, 82 FR 26943 (June
12, 2017), and ITC Publication entitled Stainless Steel Wire Rod
From India: Investigation No. 731-TA-638 (Fourth Review) (June
2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the antidumping duty order is certain
stainless steel wire rods from India, which are hot-rolled or hot-
rolled annealed and/or pickled rounds, squares, octagons, hexagons or
other shapes, in coils. Wire rods are made of alloy steels containing,
by weight, 1.2 percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more of
chromium, with or without other elements. These products are only
manufactured by hot-rolling and are normally sold in coiled form, and
are of solid cross section. The majority of wire rods sold in the
United States are round in cross-section shape, annealed, and pickled.
The most common size is 5.5 millimeters in diameter.
The wire rods subject to this order are currently classifiable
under subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018,
7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and 7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).\6\ Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise subject to the order is
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The merchandise subject to the scope of this order was
originally classifiable under all of the following HTS subheadings:
7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0020, 7221.00.0030,
7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0045, 7221.00.0060, 7221.00.0075, and
7221.00.0080. HTSUS subheadings 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0020,
7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0060, and 7221.00.0080, no longer exist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuation of the Order
As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC
that revocation of the antidumping duty order would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the
Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping
duty order on wire rods from India.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect
antidumping duty cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of
entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of
continuation of this order will be the date of publication in the
Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-
year review of the order not later than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of continuation.
This five-year sunset review and this notice are in accordance with
section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1)
of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: June 19, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017-13136 Filed 6-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
