Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 28639-28640 [2017-13121]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2017 / Notices 4412.31.2510; 4412.31.2520; 4412.31.2610; 4412.31.2620; 4412.31.4040; 4412.31.4050; 4412.31.4060; 4412.31.4075; 4412.31.4080; 4412.31.4140; 4412.31.4150; 4412.31.4160; 4412.31.4180; 4412.31.5125; 4412.31.5135; 4412.31.5155; 4412.31.5165; 4412.31.5175; 4412.31.5235; 4412.31.5255; 4412.31.5265; 4412.31.5275; 4412.31.6000; 4412.31.6100; 4412.31.9100; 4412.31.9200; 4412.32.0520; 4412.32.0540; 4412.32.0565; 4412.32.0570; 4412.32.0620; 4412.32.0640; 4412.32.0670; 4412.32.2510; 4412.32.2525; 4412.32.2530; 4412.32.2610; 4412.32.2630; 4412.32.3125; 4412.32.3135; 4412.32.3155; 4412.32.3165; 4412.32.3175; 4412.32.3185; 4412.32.3235; 4412.32.3255; 4412.32.3265; 4412.32.3275; 4412.32.3285; 4412.32.5600; 4412.32.3235; 4412.32.3255; 4412.32.3265; 4412.32.3275; 4412.32.3285; 4412.32.5700; 4412.94.1030; 4412.94.1050; 4412.94.3105; 4412.94.3111; 4412.94.3121; 4412.94.3141; 4412.94.3161; 4412.94.3175; 4412.94.4100; 4412.99.0600; 4412.99.1020; 4412.99.1030; 4412.99.1040; 4412.99.3110; 4412.99.3120; 4412.99.3130; 4412.99.3140; 4412.99.3150; 4412.99.3160; 4412.99.3170; 4412.99.4100; 4412.99.5115; and 4412.99.5710. Imports of hardwood plywood may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 4412.39.4011; 4412.39.4012; 4412.39.4019; 4412.39.4031; 4412.39.4032; 4412.39.4039; 4412.39.4051; 4412.39.4052; 4412.39.4059; 4412.39.4061; 4412.39.4062; 4412.39.4069; 4412.39.5010; 4412.39.5030; 4412.39.5050; 4412.99.6000; 4412.99.7000; 4412.99.8000; 4412.99.9000; 4412.10.9000; 4412.94.5100; 4412.94.9500; and 4412.99.9500. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Period of Investigation IV. Scope Comments V. Selection of Respondents VI. Preliminary Determination of Critical Circumstances, In Part VII. Scope of the Investigation VIII. Discussion of the Methodology A. Non-Market Economy Country B. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Values Comments C. Separate Rates D. Combination Rates E. Affiliation F. The PRC-wide Entity G. Application of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences H. Date of Sale I. Comparisons to Fair Value IX. Currency Conversion X. Export Subsidy Adjustment XI. Adjustment Under Section 777(A)(F) of the Act XII. Disclosure and Public Comment XIII. Verification XIV. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2017–13125 Filed 6–22–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:21 Jun 22, 2017 Jkt 241001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–983] Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015– 2016 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 5, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on drawn stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The period of review (POR) is April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. No interested party submitted comments on the preliminary results. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd. (Dongyuan) and Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co. Ltd. (Yingao) made sales at of subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR). We also continue to grant separate rates to ten companies which demonstrated eligibility for separate rate status but were not selected for individual examination. Finally, we continue to find that New Shichu Import and Export Company Limited (New Shichu) made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. DATES: Effective June 23, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova or Rebecca Janz, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280 or (202) 482–2972, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 5, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Results.1 The POR is April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results; none were submitted. The Department conducted this administrative review in AGENCY: 1 See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015– 2016, 82 FR 21192 (May 5, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, for a full description of the scope of the order. PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 28639 accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The products covered by the order include drawn stainless steel sinks. Imports of subject merchandise are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.2 Final Results of Review and Final Determination of No Shipments As noted above, we received no comments from interested parties on the Preliminary Results. Therefore, we have not modified our analysis from that presented in the Preliminary Results, and no decision memorandum accompanies this Federal Register notice. As a result, we continue to find that Dongyuan and Yingao made sales of subject merchandise at less than NV during the POR. In addition, we continue to find that the following ten companies which were not selected for individual examination are eligible for a separate rate: Feidong Import and Export Co., Ltd.; Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd.; Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd.; KaiPing Dawn Plumbing Products, Inc.; Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd.; Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd.; Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd; Zhuhai KOHLER Kitchen & Bathroom Products Co., Ltd.; B&R Industries Limited; and Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Finally, we continue to find that New Shichu made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. For further discussion of the issues addressed in this proceeding, see the Preliminary Results and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. We are assigning the following weightedaverage dumping margins to the respondents for the period April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016: Exporter B&R Industries, Ltd.* ............ Feidong Import & Export Co., Ltd.* ................................... Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd.* ........................... Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd. 2 Id. E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1 Weightedaverage dumping margins (percent) 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.80 28640 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2017 / Notices Exporter The Department has refined its assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by Dongyuan or Yingao, the Department 1.68 will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In 1.78 addition, because the Department determined that New Shichu had no 1.78 shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries of subject 1.78 merchandise from New Shichu will be 3 1.78 liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. Weightedaverage dumping margins (percent) asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co. Ltd. ............... Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd.* ........................... Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd.* ................. KaiPing Dawn Plumbing Products, Co., Ltd.* ........... Nigbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd.* ........................... Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd.* ................... Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd.* .................. Zhuhai KOHLER Kitchen & Bathroom Products, Co., Ltd.* ................................... Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit 1.78 requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments 1.78 of the subject merchandise from the PRC * This company demonstrated that it quali- entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, fied for a separate rate in this administrative for consumption on or after the review. We assigned this company a rate publication date, as provided for by which is the average of the weighted-average section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For dumping margins assigned to Dongyuan and Yingao. See the Preliminary Results and the the companies listed above that have a accompanying Preliminary Decision separate rate, the cash deposit rate will Memorandum. be that rate established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate Assessment Rates is zero or de minimis, then a cash Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the deposit rate of zero will be established Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the for that company); (2) for previously Department determined, and U.S. investigated or reviewed PRC and nonCustoms and Border Protection (CBP) PRC exporters that received a separate shall assess, antidumping duties on all rate in a prior segment of this appropriate entries of subject proceeding, the cash deposit rate will merchandise in accordance with the continue to be the existing exporterfinal results of this review. The specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of Department intends to issue appropriate subject merchandise that have not been assessment instructions directly to CBP found to be entitled to a separate rate, 15 days after publication of the final the cash deposit rate will be the rate for results of this administrative review. the PRC-wide entity, which is 76.45 For Dongyuan and Yingao, which percent; and (4) for all non-PRC have above weighted-average dumping exporters of subject merchandise which margins above zero or de minimis (i.e., have not received their own rate, the less than 0.5 percent), we calculated cash deposit rate will be the rate importer- (or customer-) specific perapplicable to the PRC exporter(s) that unit duty assessment rates based on the supplied that non-PRC exporter. These ratio of the total amount of dumping deposit requirements, when imposed, calculated for the importer’s (or shall remain in effect until further customer’s) examined sales to the total notice. sales quantity associated with those Notification to Importers sales, in accordance with 19 CFR This notice serves as the only 351.212(b)(1). Where either the respondents’ weighted-average dumping reminder to importers of their responsibility, under 19 CFR margin is zero or de minimis, or an 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate importer-(or customer-) specific regarding the reimbursement of assessment rate is zero or de minimis, antidumping duties prior to liquidation we will instruct CBP to liquidate the of the relevant entries during this appropriate entries without regard to review period. Failure to comply with antidumping duties. this requirement could result in the For the respondents which were not Secretary’s presumption that selected for individual examination in reimbursement of antidumping duties this administrative review and which qualified for a separate rate, the 3 For a full discussion of this practice, see Nonassessment rate is equal to the average Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: of the weighted-average dumping Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 margins assigned to Dongyuan and (October 24, 2011) (NME Antidumping Yingao, or 1.78 percent. Proceedings). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:21 Jun 22, 2017 1.78 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: June 19, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2017–13121 Filed 6–22–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–808] Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain stainless steel wire rods (wire rods) from India would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of continuation of the antidumping duty order. AGENCY: DATES: Effective June 23, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andre Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–2201. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 120 (Friday, June 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28639-28640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-983]


Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final 
Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 5, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on drawn stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) 
from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The period of review (POR) 
is April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. No interested party submitted 
comments on the preliminary results. Therefore, for the final results, 
we continue to find that Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., 
Ltd. (Dongyuan) and Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co. Ltd. (Yingao) 
made sales at of subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) 
during the period of review (POR). We also continue to grant separate 
rates to ten companies which demonstrated eligibility for separate rate 
status but were not selected for individual examination. Finally, we 
continue to find that New Shichu Import and Export Company Limited (New 
Shichu) made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.

DATES: Effective June 23, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova or Rebecca 
Janz, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1280 or (202) 482-2972, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  On May 5, 2017, the Department published 
the Preliminary Results.\1\ The POR is April 1, 2015, through March 31, 
2016. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results; none 
were submitted. The Department conducted this administrative review in 
accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic 
of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 
FR 21192 (May 5, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum, for a full description of the scope 
of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the order include drawn stainless steel 
sinks. Imports of subject merchandise are currently classified under 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 
7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010. Although the HTSUS subheadings are 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description 
of the scope of the order is dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review and Final Determination of No Shipments

    As noted above, we received no comments from interested parties on 
the Preliminary Results. Therefore, we have not modified our analysis 
from that presented in the Preliminary Results, and no decision 
memorandum accompanies this Federal Register notice. As a result, we 
continue to find that Dongyuan and Yingao made sales of subject 
merchandise at less than NV during the POR. In addition, we continue to 
find that the following ten companies which were not selected for 
individual examination are eligible for a separate rate: Feidong Import 
and Export Co., Ltd.; Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd.; Xinhe 
Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd.; KaiPing Dawn Plumbing Products, 
Inc.; Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd.; Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech 
Enterprise Ltd.; Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd; Zhuhai KOHLER Kitchen 
& Bathroom Products Co., Ltd.; B&R Industries Limited; and Zhongshan 
Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Finally, we continue to find that New 
Shichu made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.
    For further discussion of the issues addressed in this proceeding, 
see the Preliminary Results and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum. We are assigning the following weighted-average dumping 
margins to the respondents for the period April 1, 2015, through March 
31, 2016:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                        Exporter                              dumping
                                                              margins
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B&R Industries, Ltd.*...................................            1.78
Feidong Import & Export Co., Ltd.*......................            1.78
Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd.*........................            1.78
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd......            1.80

[[Page 28640]]

 
Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co. Ltd...............            1.68
Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd.*.....................            1.78
Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd.*..............            1.78
KaiPing Dawn Plumbing Products, Co., Ltd.*..............            1.78
Nigbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd.*...................            1.78
Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd.*...............            1.78
Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd.*................            1.78
Zhuhai KOHLER Kitchen & Bathroom Products, Co., Ltd.*...            1.78
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This company demonstrated that it qualified for a separate rate in
  this administrative review. We assigned this company a rate which is
  the average of the weighted-average dumping margins assigned to
  Dongyuan and Yingao. See the Preliminary Results and the accompanying
  Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject 
merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The 
Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions 
directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this 
administrative review.
    For Dongyuan and Yingao, which have above weighted-average dumping 
margins above zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we 
calculated importer- (or customer-) specific per-unit duty assessment 
rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for 
the importer's (or customer's) examined sales to the total sales 
quantity associated with those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1). Where either the respondents' weighted-average dumping 
margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-(or customer-) specific 
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
    For the respondents which were not selected for individual 
examination in this administrative review and which qualified for a 
separate rate, the assessment rate is equal to the average of the 
weighted-average dumping margins assigned to Dongyuan and Yingao, or 
1.78 percent.
    The Department has refined its assessment practice in NME cases. 
Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not 
reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by Dongyuan or Yingao, 
the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-
wide rate. In addition, because the Department determined that New 
Shichu had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended 
entries of subject merchandise from New Shichu will be liquidated at 
the PRC-wide rate.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (NME Antidumping Proceedings).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies 
listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be 
that rate established in the final results of this review (except, if 
the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will 
be established for that company); (2) for previously investigated or 
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that received a separate rate in a 
prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue 
to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of 
subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a 
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide 
entity, which is 76.45 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of 
subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that 
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as the only reminder to importers of their 
responsibility, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to 
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: June 19, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017-13121 Filed 6-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P