Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Regarding Market Maker Quotations, 28109-28113 [2017-12893]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 20, 2017 / Notices
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2017–64 and should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–12761 Filed 6–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–80944; File No. SR–ISE–
2017–42)
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Regarding Market Maker
Quotations
June 15, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 12,
2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II,
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 804, entitled ‘‘Market Maker
Quotations.’’
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at www.ise.com, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Jun 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend ISE
Rule 804, entitled ‘‘Market Maker
Quotations’’ to amend the current rule
text at ISE Rule 804(g)(1) and (2) to
adopt a revised description of the
manner in which ISE removes market
maker quotes when certain risk
parameters have been triggered. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
new rule text will provide more detailed
information to participants concerning
the manner in which these risk features
will remove quotes from the Order
Book.
Today, ISE Rule 804(g)(1) provides
that a market maker must provide
parameters by which the Exchange will
automatically remove a market maker’s
quotations in all series of an options
class. If a market maker does not
provide parameters then the Exchange
will apply default parameters
announced to members. The Exchange
will automatically remove a market
maker’s quotation when, during a time
period established by the market maker,
the market maker exceeds: (i) The
specified number of total contracts in
the class, (ii) the specified percentage of
the total size of the market maker’s
quotes in the class, (iii) the specified
absolute value of the net between
contracts bought and contracts sold in
the class, or (iv) the specified absolute
value of the net between (a) calls
purchased plus puts sold in the class,
and (b) calls sold plus puts purchased
in the class.
The Exchange proposes to adopt new
rule text, which continues to require a
market maker to provide parameters by
which the Exchange will automatically
remove a market maker’s quotations in
all series of an options class. If a market
maker does not provide parameters then
the Exchange will apply default
parameters announced to members. This
is not being amended, rather it is being
expanded.
The proposed rule text in 804(g)(1)
makes clear that market makers are
required to utilize the Percentage,
Volume, Delta and Vega Thresholds,
each a Threshold, described in
subsections (A)–(D) in the new rule text.
These are the same risk parameters that
are offered today by ISE. The Exchange
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28109
is seeking to identify each risk
parameter specifically and describe the
function of each parameter in Rule
804(g)(1)(A)–(D). For each feature, the
Exchange’s system (‘‘System’’) will
continue to automatically remove
quotes in all series in an options class
when a certain threshold for any of the
parameters has been exceeded.
The Exchange elaborates in the
proposed rule that a market maker is
required to specify a period of time not
to exceed 30 seconds (‘‘Specified Time
Period’’) during which the system will
automatically remove a Market Maker’s
quotes in all series of an options class.
The limitation of not to exceed 30
seconds is new for ISE Members. In
order to establish a reasonable limit to
the allowable Specified Time Period, an
ISE Member will be limited to the [sic]
setting their Specified Time period to no
more than 30 seconds for these
Thresholds. A Specified Time Period
will commence for an options class
every time an execution occurs in any
series in such options class and will
continue until the System removes
quotes as described in proposed ISE
Rule 804(g)(2) or (3) or the Specified
Time Period expires. This is the case
today, and is not changing. The
Specified Time Periods will be the same
value described in subsections (A)–(D).
Also, as is the case today, a Specified
Time Period operates on a rolling basis
among all series in an options class in
that there may be Specified Time
Periods occurring simultaneously for
each Threshold and such Specified
Time Periods may overlap. If a Market
Maker does not provide parameters, the
Exchange will apply default parameters,
which default settings will be
announced to Members via an Options
Trader Alert.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(1)(A) describes
in greater detail the operation of the
Percentage Threshold. As is the case
today, a Market Maker must provide a
specified percentage of quote size
(‘‘Percentage Threshold’’), of not less
than 1%, by which the System will
automatically remove a Market Maker’s
quotes in all series of an options class.
The Exchange is adding more detail
about the manner in which the System
will calculate percentages and
amending the current rule to change its
operation. For each series in an options
class, the System will determine (i)
during a Specified Time Period and for
each side in a given series, a percentage
calculated by dividing the size of a
Market Maker’s quote size executed in
a particular series (the numerator) by
the Marker Maker’s quote size available
at the time of execution plus the total
number of the Market Marker’s quote
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
28110
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 20, 2017 / Notices
size previously executed during the
unexpired Specified Time Period (the
denominator) (‘‘Series Percentage’’); and
(ii) the sum of the Series Percentages in
the options class (‘‘Issue Percentage’’)
during a Specified Time Period. The
System will track and calculate the net
impact of positions in the same option
issue; long call percentages are offset by
short call percentages, and long put
percentages are offset by short put
percentages in the Issue Percentage. The
Exchange also notes that in calculating
the Percentage the System will compare
the number of contracts executed in that
series relative to the size of the quote at
the time of the execution plus the
number of executed contracts that have
occurred in the current time period. The
current system calculates the Percentage
risk parameter by comparing the
number of contracts executed in that
series relative to the size of the original
quote only at the time of the execution.
This difference is captured within the
proposed rule text. The Exchange notes
that with the upcoming migration from
ISE’s current system to the INET system
the manner in which the System offsets
will change. The current ISE system
does not offset, in that long call
percentages are not offset by short call
percentages, and long put percentages
are not offset by short put percentages.
The proposed System however will
track and calculate the net impact.3 The
Exchange notes this difference in the
calculation and seeks to memorialize
the change in the process upon the
migration to INET. The proposed rule
will provide participants with greater
clarity as to the operation of the
Percentage risk feature on INET. The
proposed text indicates that if the Issue
Percentage exceeds the Percentage
Threshold the System will
automatically remove a market maker’s
quotes in all series of the options class.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(1)(B) describes
in greater detail the operation of the
Volume Threshold. As is the case today
on ISE’s current system, a market maker
must provide a Volume Threshold by
which the System will automatically
remove a market maker’s quotes in all
series of an underlying security when
the market maker executes a number of
contracts which exceeds the designated
number of contracts in all options series
in an options class.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(1)(C) describes
in greater detail the operation of the
Delta Threshold. As is the case today on
ISE’s current system, a market maker
must provide a Delta Threshold by
which the System will automatically
3 The net impact of positions takes into account
the offsets noted herein.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Jun 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
remove a market maker’s quotes in all
series of an underlying security. For
each class of options, the System will
maintain a Delta counter, which tracks
the absolute value of the difference
between (i) purchased call contracts
plus sold put contracts and (ii) sold call
contracts plus purchased put contracts.
If the Delta counter exceeds the Delta
Threshold established by the Member,
the System will automatically remove a
market maker’s quotes in all series of
the options class.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(1)(D) describes
in greater detail the operation of the
Vega Threshold. As is the case today on
ISE’s system, a market maker must
provide a Vega Threshold by which the
System will automatically remove a
Market Maker’s quotes in all series of an
options class. For each class of options,
the System will maintain a Vega
counter, which tracks the absolute value
of purchased contracts minus sold
contracts. If the Vega counter exceeds
the Vega Threshold established by the
Member, the System will automatically
remove a Market Maker’s quotes in all
series of the options class.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(2) provides
more detail about the System’s current
operation with respect to quote removal.
The System will automatically remove
quotes in all options in an underlying
security when the Percentage
Threshold, Volume Threshold, Delta
Threshold or Vega Threshold has been
exceeded. The System will send a Purge
Notification Message to the Market
Maker for all affected series when any
of the above thresholds have been
exceeded. The Percentage Threshold,
Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold and
Vega Threshold are considered
independently of each other. Quotes
will be automatically executed up to the
Market Maker’s size regardless of
whether the execution of such quotes
would cause the Market Maker to
exceed the Percentage Threshold,
Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold or
Vega Threshold.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(3) provides
more detail about the manner in which
the System resets the counting of the
various risk parameters.
Notwithstanding the automatic removal
of quotes described in the rule, if a
market maker requests the System to
remove quotes in all options series in an
options class, the System will
automatically reset all Thresholds.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(4) provides
more detail about the process to reinitiate quoting. When the System
removes quotes because the Percentage
Threshold, Volume Threshold, Delta
Threshold or Vega Threshold were
exceeded, the market maker must send
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a re-entry indicator to re-enter the
System.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(5) provides
more detail about default parameters as
mentioned above. If a market maker
does not provide a parameter for each of
the automated quotation removal
Thresholds described in Rule
804(g)(1)(A–D) above, the Exchange will
apply default parameters, which are
announced to Members. This language
exists today in the current text and is
being memorialized herein.
Finally, proposed Rule 804(g)(6)
describes the interaction between the
four Thresholds and the market wide
parameter. In addition to the Thresholds
described in Rule 804(g)(1)(A)–(D)
above, a market maker must provide a
market wide parameter by which the
Exchange will automatically remove a
market maker’s quotes in all classes
when, during a time period established
by the market maker, the total number
of quote removal events specified in
Rule 804(g)(1)(A)–(D) exceeds the
market wide parameter provided to the
Exchange by the market maker. As is the
case today, Market Makers may request
the Exchange to set the market wide
parameter to apply to just Nasdaq ISE or
across Nasdaq ISE and GEMX.
Below are some illustrative examples
of the Percentage and Volume risk
parameters.
Example #1: Describes the Percentage
risk parameter. Presume the following
Order Book:
Series of underlying
XYZ
100
100
110
110
Strike
Strike
Strike
Strike
Call
Put
Call
Put
..........
...........
..........
...........
Size on bid x offer for
MM1
300x300
50x50
200x200
150x150
In this example, assume the Specified
Time Period designated by the Market
Maker #1 is 10 seconds and the
Percentage Threshold is set to 100%.
Assume at 12:00:00, Market Maker #1
executes 100 contracts of his offer size,
200 contracts, in the 110 Strike Calls.
This represents an execution equaling
50% (100 contracts of the 200 contract
quote size) of the 100% Percentage
Threshold. Assume at 12:00:01, Market
Maker #1 executes 50 additional
contracts in the same 110 Strike Calls.
This execution equates to an additional
25% ((50 contracts/(100 remaining
quote size +100 contracts already
executed within the Specified Time
Period)) for a net 75% Series Percentage
count toward the 100% Percentage
Threshold. If at 12:00:03, Market Maker
#1 executes the full size of his bid (50
contracts) in the 100 Strike Put, the
System will automatically remove all of
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 20, 2017 / Notices
Market Maker #1’s quotes in Underlying
XYZ since the execution caused his
100% Percentage Threshold to be
exceeded; the execution in the 100
Strike Put added 100% Series
Percentage to his previously calculated
Series Percentage of 75% totaling 175%
Issue Percentage. No further quotes for
Market Maker #1 in Underlying XYZ
will be available until re-entry. The
Specified Time Period will be reset for
Market Maker #1 in options class XYZ
and Market Maker #1 will need to send
a re-entry indicator in order to re-enter
quotes in options series for options class
XYZ into the System.
Example #2 is another example of the
Percentage Threshold. Presume the
following Order Book:
In this example, assume Market
Maker #1 has Percentage Threshold set
at 100% with a Specified Time Period
over 5 seconds. Assume at 12:00:00,
Market Maker #1 is quoting the XYZ 20
strike calls at 1.00 (10)¥1.20 (10). An
incoming Order to buy 5 contracts for
1.20 trades against Market Maker #1’s
quote. Based on this trade, the Series
Percentage Threshold calculation is 5/
[(10) + (0)] = 5/10 = 50%. Since this is
the only execution during the Time
Period, 50% also represents the Issue
Percentage, therefore Market Maker #1’s
quote is now 1.00 (10)¥1.20 (5).
Next, assume at 12:00:01 an Incoming
Order to buy 2 contracts for 1.20 trades
against Market Maker #1’s quote. Based
on this trade, the Series Percentage
Threshold calculation is 2/[(5) + (5)] =
2/10 = 20%. The Issue Percentage
calculation is the sum of Series
Percentages during the time period, or
50% + 20% = 70%.
Finally, presume Market Maker #1’s
quote is now 1.00 (10)¥1.20 (3). At
12:00:02, Market Maker #1 updates his
quote in the XYZ 20 strike calls to
increase his offer size back to 10
contracts, 1.00 (10)¥1.20 (10). An
incoming Order to buy 6 contracts for
1.20 trades against Market Maker #1’s
quote. Based on this trade, the Series
Percentage Threshold calculation: 6/
[(10) + (7)] = 6/17 = 35.29%. The Issue
Percentage calculation is the sum of
Series Percentages during the time
period, or 50% + 20% + 35.29% =
105.29%. In this scenario, Market Maler
[sic] #1’s quotes are removed in all
series of XYZ since his setting of 100%
over 5 seconds has been exceeded.
Example #3 describes the Volume
Threshold. Presume the following Order
Book:
Series of underlying
XYZ
100 Strike Call ..........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Size on bid x offer for
MM1
300x300
18:01 Jun 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
Series of underlying
XYZ
100 Strike Put ...........
110 Strike Call ..........
110 Strike Put ...........
Size on bid x offer for
MM1
platform as the symbols migrate to that
platform.
50x50
200x200
150x150
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 6 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 7
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest, by
memorializing, with greater detail, the
risk protections available to market
makers. The described Thresholds serve
to decrease risk and increase stability.
Additionally, because the Exchange
offers these risk tools to market makers,
in order to encourage them to provide
as much liquidity as possible and
encourage market making generally, the
proposal removes impediments to and
perfects the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system and protects investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
that amending Rule 804(g) to add more
clarifying text, which explains in greater
detail the manner in which the four
Thresholds operate, will bring more
transparency to the rule which serves to
protect investors and the public interest,
because market makers will be more
informed about the manner in which the
functionality operates.
In addition, the Exchange’s proposal
to amend the current Percentage
Threshold to: (i) Calculate offsets; and
(ii) calculate the Percentage Threshold
during a Specified Time Period and for
each side in a given series, a percentage,
by dividing the size of a Market Maker’s
quote size executed in a particular series
(the numerator) by the Marker Maker’s
quote size available at the time of
execution plus the total number of the
Market Marker’s quote size previously
executed during the unexpired
Specified Time Period, will provide
Market Makers with greater precision in
calculating quoting risks. The Exchange
believes that providing Market Makers
with tools to calculate risk serves to
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest
because Market Makers are better able to
manage risks with this risk tool.
The Exchange further represents that
its proposal will continue to operate
consistently with the firm quote
obligations of a broker-dealer pursuant
In this example, assume the Specified
Time Period designated by the Market
Maker #1 is 10 seconds and the
designated number of contracts
permitted for the Volume-Based
Threshold is 250 contracts. Assume at
12:00:00, the Market Maker #1 executes
all of his offer size, 200 contracts, in the
110 Strike Calls. The System will
initiate the Specified Time Period and
for 10 seconds the System will count all
volume executed in series of options
class XYZ. If at any point during that 10
second period, the Market Maker #1
executes additional contracts in any
series of the options class XYZ, those
contracts will be added to the initial
execution of 200 contracts. To illustrate,
assume at 12:00:05 the Market Maker #1
executes 60 contracts of his offer in the
100 Strike Calls. The total volume
executed is now 260 contracts. Since
that volume exceeds the Market Maker
#1’s designated number of contracts for
the Volume Threshold (250 contracts),
all of his quotes in all series of the
options class XYZ over the Specialized
Quote Feed 4 will be removed from the
System; no further quotes will be
executed until re-entry. The Volume
Specified Time Period will be reset for
Market Maker #1 in options class XYZ
and Market Maker #1 will need to send
a re-entry indicator in order to re-enter
quotes in options series for options class
XYZ into the System.
Implementation
The Exchange will begin a system
migration to Nasdaq INET in Q2 of
2017.5 The migration will be on a
symbol by symbol basis as specified by
the Exchange in a notice to Members.
The Exchange is proposing to
implement this rule change on the INET
4 The Specialized Quote Feed interface that
allows market makers to connect and send quotes,
sweeps and auction responses into GEMX. Data
includes the following: (1) Options Auction
Notifications (e.g., opening imbalance, Flash, PIM,
Solicitation and Facilitation or other information);
(2) Options Symbol Directory Messages; (3) System
Event Messages (e.g., start of messages, start of
system hours, start of quoting, start of opening); (4)
Option Trading Action Messages (e.g., halts,
resumes); (5) Execution Messages; and (6) Quote
Messages (quote/sweep messages, risk protection
triggers or purge notifications).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80432
(April 11, 2017), 82 FR 18191 (April 17, 2017) (SR–
ISE–2017–03) (Order Approving Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, to
Amend Various Rules in Connection with a System
Migration to Nasdaq INET Technology).
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
28111
Sfmt 4703
6 15
7 15
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
20JNN1
28112
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 20, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
to Rule 602 of Regulation NMS and that
the functionality is mandatory.
Specifically, any interest that is
executable against a market maker’s
quotes that are received 8 by the
Exchange prior to the time any of these
functionalities are engaged will be
automatically executed at the price up
to the market maker’s size, regardless of
whether such execution results in
executions in excess of the market
maker’s pre-set parameters.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Specifically,
the proposal will not impose a burden
on intra-market or inter-market
competition, rather it provides market
makers with the continued opportunity
to avail themselves of risk tools, [sic]
The proposal does not impose a burden
on inter-market competition, because
participants may choose to become
market makers on a number of other
options exchanges, which may have
similar but not identical features.9 The
proposed rule change is meant to
continue to protect market makers from
inadvertent exposure to excessive risk.
Accordingly, the proposed rule change
will have no impact on competition.
The Exchange’s proposal to amend the
current Percentage Based risk feature to:
(i) Calculate offsets; and (ii) calculate
the Percentage Threshold during a
Specified Time Period and for each side
in a given series, a percentage, by
dividing the size of a Market Maker’s
quote size executed in a particular series
(the numerator) by the Market Maker’s
quote size available at the time of
execution plus the total number of the
Market Marker’s quote size previously
executed during the unexpired
Specified Time Period,, [sic] does not
impose an undue burden on
competition and is non-controversial
because the Exchange offers a
Percentage Threshold today. The
proposed changes to the Percentage risk
tool simply add more precision to the
existing calculation to permit Market
Makers to better control their risk with
respect to quoting.
Further, the Exchange is
memorializing more detail concerning
the function of the Thresholds with this
rule proposal and making clear the
8 The time of receipt is the time such message is
processed by the Order Book.
9 See BATS Rule 21.16, BOX Rules 8100 and
8110, C2 Rule 8.12, CBOE Rule 8.18, MIAX Rule
612, NYSE MKT Rule 928NY and NYSE Arca Rule
6.40.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Jun 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
method in which the Percentage risk
tool is calculated. The risk tools will
continue to reduce risk for market
makers in the event of a systems issue
or due to the occurrence of unusual or
unexpected market activity.
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest; for the protection of
investors; or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 10 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.11
In its filing, ISE requests that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay in order to enable the Exchange to
coordinate the implementation of the
proposed rule changes with its planned
migration to the INET platform, which
has commenced.12 Although the
Exchange proposes certain technical
changes to how the risk parameters will
operate (e.g., limiting the Specified
Time Period to 30 seconds), the
proposed changes are largely intended
to provide more detail about the
operation of the existing risk
parameters. Accordingly, the
Commission believes that granting a
waiver of the operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest and
therefore designates the proposed rule
change to be operative upon filing.13
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
12 See supra note 5 and accompanying text.
13 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
11 17
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ISE–2017–42 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2017–42. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2017–42 and should be submitted on or
before July 11, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 20, 2017 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–12893 Filed 6–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–80937; File No. SR–MRX–
2017–01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 2 Thereto, To Amend
the Opening Process
June 15, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 31,
2017, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. On June 14, 2017, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposal. On June 14, 2017, the
Exchange withdrew Amendment No.1
and filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposal, which replaced and
superseded the original filing in its
entirety. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 2, from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to mend the
opening process. This Amendment No.
2 supersedes the original filing in its
entirety.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at www.ise.com, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12) and (59).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Jun 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
28113
experience that they receive on Phlx
today.
MRX will replace its current opening
process at Rule 701 with Phlx’s Opening
Process.3 The Exchange believes that the
proposed opening process will provide
a similar experience for Members and
investors that trade on MRX to the
Current Opening Process
Today, for each class of options that
has been approved for trading, the
opening rotation is conducted by the
Primary Market Maker (‘‘PMM’’)
appointed to such class of options
pursuant to MRX Rule 701(b)(1). The
Exchange may direct that one or more
trading rotations be employed on any
business day to aid in producing a fair
and orderly market pursuant to MRX
Rule 701(a)(1). For each rotation so
employed, except as the Exchange may
direct, rotations are conducted in the
order and manner the PMM determines
to be appropriate under the
circumstances pursuant to MRX Rule
701(a)(2). The PMM, with the approval
of the Exchange, has the authority to
determine the rotation order and
manner and may also employ multiple
trading rotations simultaneously
pursuant to MRX Rule 701(a)(3).
Trading rotations are employed at the
opening of the Exchange each business
day and during the reopening of the
market after a trading halt pursuant to
MRX Rule 701(b). The opening rotation
in each class of options is held promptly
following the opening of the market for
the underlying security.4 The opening
rotation for options contracts in an
underlying security is delayed until the
market for such underlying security has
opened unless the Exchange determines
that the interests of a fair and orderly
market are best served by opening
trading in the options contracts
pursuant to MRX Rule 701(b)(3).
Market Makers on MRX are held to
quoting obligations as outlined in MRX
Rule 803. Further, Market Makers
quotes prior to the opening rotation,
including PMM quotes, are permitted
with spread differential of no more than
$0.25 between the bid and offer for each
options contract for which the bid is
less than $2, no more than $0.40 where
the bid is at least $2 but does not exceed
$5, no more than $0.50 where the bid
is more than $5 but does not exceed
$10, no more than $0.80 where the bid
is more than $10 but does not exceed
$20, and no more than $1 where the bid
is $20 or greater, provided that the
Exchange may establish differences
other than the above for one or more
options series, as specified in MRX Rule
3 See Phlx Rule 1017. See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 79274 (November 9,
2016), 81 FR 80694 (November 16, 2016) (SR–Phlx–
2017–79) (notice of Filing of Partial Amendment
No. 2 and Order Granting Approval of a Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by Partial Amendment
No. 2, to Amend PHLX Rule 1017, Openings in
Options).
4 The ‘‘market for the underlying security’’ is
either the primary listing market, the primary
volume market (defined as the market with the most
liquidity in that underlying security for the
previous two calendar months), or the first market
to open the underlying security, as determined by
the Exchange on an issue-by-issue basis. See MRX
Rule 701(b)(2).
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this rule change is to
amend the MRX opening process in
connection with a technology migration
to a Nasdaq, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’) supported
architecture. INET is the proprietary
core technology utilized across Nasdaq’s
global markets and utilized on The
NASDAQ Options Market LLC
(‘‘NOM’’), NASDAQ PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’)
and NASDAQ BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’)
(collectively ‘‘Nasdaq Exchanges’’). The
migration of MRX to the Nasdaq INET
architecture would result in higher
performance, scalability, and more
robust architecture. With this system
migration, the Exchange intends to
adopt the Phlx opening process.
The Exchange intends to begin
implementation of the proposed rule
change in Q3 2017. The migration will
be on a symbol by symbol basis, and the
Exchange will issue an alert to Members
to provide notification of the symbols
that will migrate and the relevant dates.
Generally
With the re-platform, the Exchange
will now be built on the Nasdaq INET
architecture, which allows certain
trading system functionality to be
performed in parallel. The Exchange
believes that this architecture change
will improve the Member experience by
reducing overall latency compared to
the current MRX system because of the
manner in which the system is
segregated into component parts to
handle processing.
Opening Rotation
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28109-28113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12893]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-80944; File No. SR-ISE-2017-42)
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Regarding Market
Maker Quotations
June 15, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 12, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II, below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 804, entitled ``Market Maker
Quotations.''
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend ISE Rule 804, entitled ``Market
Maker Quotations'' to amend the current rule text at ISE Rule 804(g)(1)
and (2) to adopt a revised description of the manner in which ISE
removes market maker quotes when certain risk parameters have been
triggered. The Exchange believes that the proposed new rule text will
provide more detailed information to participants concerning the manner
in which these risk features will remove quotes from the Order Book.
Today, ISE Rule 804(g)(1) provides that a market maker must provide
parameters by which the Exchange will automatically remove a market
maker's quotations in all series of an options class. If a market maker
does not provide parameters then the Exchange will apply default
parameters announced to members. The Exchange will automatically remove
a market maker's quotation when, during a time period established by
the market maker, the market maker exceeds: (i) The specified number of
total contracts in the class, (ii) the specified percentage of the
total size of the market maker's quotes in the class, (iii) the
specified absolute value of the net between contracts bought and
contracts sold in the class, or (iv) the specified absolute value of
the net between (a) calls purchased plus puts sold in the class, and
(b) calls sold plus puts purchased in the class.
The Exchange proposes to adopt new rule text, which continues to
require a market maker to provide parameters by which the Exchange will
automatically remove a market maker's quotations in all series of an
options class. If a market maker does not provide parameters then the
Exchange will apply default parameters announced to members. This is
not being amended, rather it is being expanded.
The proposed rule text in 804(g)(1) makes clear that market makers
are required to utilize the Percentage, Volume, Delta and Vega
Thresholds, each a Threshold, described in subsections (A)-(D) in the
new rule text. These are the same risk parameters that are offered
today by ISE. The Exchange is seeking to identify each risk parameter
specifically and describe the function of each parameter in Rule
804(g)(1)(A)-(D). For each feature, the Exchange's system (``System'')
will continue to automatically remove quotes in all series in an
options class when a certain threshold for any of the parameters has
been exceeded.
The Exchange elaborates in the proposed rule that a market maker is
required to specify a period of time not to exceed 30 seconds
(``Specified Time Period'') during which the system will automatically
remove a Market Maker's quotes in all series of an options class. The
limitation of not to exceed 30 seconds is new for ISE Members. In order
to establish a reasonable limit to the allowable Specified Time Period,
an ISE Member will be limited to the [sic] setting their Specified Time
period to no more than 30 seconds for these Thresholds. A Specified
Time Period will commence for an options class every time an execution
occurs in any series in such options class and will continue until the
System removes quotes as described in proposed ISE Rule 804(g)(2) or
(3) or the Specified Time Period expires. This is the case today, and
is not changing. The Specified Time Periods will be the same value
described in subsections (A)-(D). Also, as is the case today, a
Specified Time Period operates on a rolling basis among all series in
an options class in that there may be Specified Time Periods occurring
simultaneously for each Threshold and such Specified Time Periods may
overlap. If a Market Maker does not provide parameters, the Exchange
will apply default parameters, which default settings will be announced
to Members via an Options Trader Alert.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(1)(A) describes in greater detail the
operation of the Percentage Threshold. As is the case today, a Market
Maker must provide a specified percentage of quote size (``Percentage
Threshold''), of not less than 1%, by which the System will
automatically remove a Market Maker's quotes in all series of an
options class. The Exchange is adding more detail about the manner in
which the System will calculate percentages and amending the current
rule to change its operation. For each series in an options class, the
System will determine (i) during a Specified Time Period and for each
side in a given series, a percentage calculated by dividing the size of
a Market Maker's quote size executed in a particular series (the
numerator) by the Marker Maker's quote size available at the time of
execution plus the total number of the Market Marker's quote
[[Page 28110]]
size previously executed during the unexpired Specified Time Period
(the denominator) (``Series Percentage''); and (ii) the sum of the
Series Percentages in the options class (``Issue Percentage'') during a
Specified Time Period. The System will track and calculate the net
impact of positions in the same option issue; long call percentages are
offset by short call percentages, and long put percentages are offset
by short put percentages in the Issue Percentage. The Exchange also
notes that in calculating the Percentage the System will compare the
number of contracts executed in that series relative to the size of the
quote at the time of the execution plus the number of executed
contracts that have occurred in the current time period. The current
system calculates the Percentage risk parameter by comparing the number
of contracts executed in that series relative to the size of the
original quote only at the time of the execution. This difference is
captured within the proposed rule text. The Exchange notes that with
the upcoming migration from ISE's current system to the INET system the
manner in which the System offsets will change. The current ISE system
does not offset, in that long call percentages are not offset by short
call percentages, and long put percentages are not offset by short put
percentages. The proposed System however will track and calculate the
net impact.\3\ The Exchange notes this difference in the calculation
and seeks to memorialize the change in the process upon the migration
to INET. The proposed rule will provide participants with greater
clarity as to the operation of the Percentage risk feature on INET. The
proposed text indicates that if the Issue Percentage exceeds the
Percentage Threshold the System will automatically remove a market
maker's quotes in all series of the options class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The net impact of positions takes into account the offsets
noted herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 804(g)(1)(B) describes in greater detail the
operation of the Volume Threshold. As is the case today on ISE's
current system, a market maker must provide a Volume Threshold by which
the System will automatically remove a market maker's quotes in all
series of an underlying security when the market maker executes a
number of contracts which exceeds the designated number of contracts in
all options series in an options class.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(1)(C) describes in greater detail the
operation of the Delta Threshold. As is the case today on ISE's current
system, a market maker must provide a Delta Threshold by which the
System will automatically remove a market maker's quotes in all series
of an underlying security. For each class of options, the System will
maintain a Delta counter, which tracks the absolute value of the
difference between (i) purchased call contracts plus sold put contracts
and (ii) sold call contracts plus purchased put contracts. If the Delta
counter exceeds the Delta Threshold established by the Member, the
System will automatically remove a market maker's quotes in all series
of the options class.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(1)(D) describes in greater detail the
operation of the Vega Threshold. As is the case today on ISE's system,
a market maker must provide a Vega Threshold by which the System will
automatically remove a Market Maker's quotes in all series of an
options class. For each class of options, the System will maintain a
Vega counter, which tracks the absolute value of purchased contracts
minus sold contracts. If the Vega counter exceeds the Vega Threshold
established by the Member, the System will automatically remove a
Market Maker's quotes in all series of the options class.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(2) provides more detail about the System's
current operation with respect to quote removal. The System will
automatically remove quotes in all options in an underlying security
when the Percentage Threshold, Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold or
Vega Threshold has been exceeded. The System will send a Purge
Notification Message to the Market Maker for all affected series when
any of the above thresholds have been exceeded. The Percentage
Threshold, Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold and Vega Threshold are
considered independently of each other. Quotes will be automatically
executed up to the Market Maker's size regardless of whether the
execution of such quotes would cause the Market Maker to exceed the
Percentage Threshold, Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold or Vega
Threshold.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(3) provides more detail about the manner in
which the System resets the counting of the various risk parameters.
Notwithstanding the automatic removal of quotes described in the rule,
if a market maker requests the System to remove quotes in all options
series in an options class, the System will automatically reset all
Thresholds.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(4) provides more detail about the process to
re-initiate quoting. When the System removes quotes because the
Percentage Threshold, Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold or Vega
Threshold were exceeded, the market maker must send a re-entry
indicator to re-enter the System.
Proposed Rule 804(g)(5) provides more detail about default
parameters as mentioned above. If a market maker does not provide a
parameter for each of the automated quotation removal Thresholds
described in Rule 804(g)(1)(A-D) above, the Exchange will apply default
parameters, which are announced to Members. This language exists today
in the current text and is being memorialized herein.
Finally, proposed Rule 804(g)(6) describes the interaction between
the four Thresholds and the market wide parameter. In addition to the
Thresholds described in Rule 804(g)(1)(A)-(D) above, a market maker
must provide a market wide parameter by which the Exchange will
automatically remove a market maker's quotes in all classes when,
during a time period established by the market maker, the total number
of quote removal events specified in Rule 804(g)(1)(A)-(D) exceeds the
market wide parameter provided to the Exchange by the market maker. As
is the case today, Market Makers may request the Exchange to set the
market wide parameter to apply to just Nasdaq ISE or across Nasdaq ISE
and GEMX.
Below are some illustrative examples of the Percentage and Volume
risk parameters.
Example #1: Describes the Percentage risk parameter. Presume the
following Order Book:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Series of underlying XYZ Size on bid x offer for MM1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100 Strike Call........................... 300x300
100 Strike Put............................ 50x50
110 Strike Call........................... 200x200
110 Strike Put............................ 150x150
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this example, assume the Specified Time Period designated by the
Market Maker #1 is 10 seconds and the Percentage Threshold is set to
100%. Assume at 12:00:00, Market Maker #1 executes 100 contracts of his
offer size, 200 contracts, in the 110 Strike Calls. This represents an
execution equaling 50% (100 contracts of the 200 contract quote size)
of the 100% Percentage Threshold. Assume at 12:00:01, Market Maker #1
executes 50 additional contracts in the same 110 Strike Calls. This
execution equates to an additional 25% ((50 contracts/(100 remaining
quote size +100 contracts already executed within the Specified Time
Period)) for a net 75% Series Percentage count toward the 100%
Percentage Threshold. If at 12:00:03, Market Maker #1 executes the full
size of his bid (50 contracts) in the 100 Strike Put, the System will
automatically remove all of
[[Page 28111]]
Market Maker #1's quotes in Underlying XYZ since the execution caused
his 100% Percentage Threshold to be exceeded; the execution in the 100
Strike Put added 100% Series Percentage to his previously calculated
Series Percentage of 75% totaling 175% Issue Percentage. No further
quotes for Market Maker #1 in Underlying XYZ will be available until
re-entry. The Specified Time Period will be reset for Market Maker #1
in options class XYZ and Market Maker #1 will need to send a re-entry
indicator in order to re-enter quotes in options series for options
class XYZ into the System.
Example #2 is another example of the Percentage Threshold. Presume
the following Order Book:
In this example, assume Market Maker #1 has Percentage Threshold
set at 100% with a Specified Time Period over 5 seconds. Assume at
12:00:00, Market Maker #1 is quoting the XYZ 20 strike calls at 1.00
(10)-1.20 (10). An incoming Order to buy 5 contracts for 1.20 trades
against Market Maker #1's quote. Based on this trade, the Series
Percentage Threshold calculation is 5/[(10) + (0)] = 5/10 = 50%. Since
this is the only execution during the Time Period, 50% also represents
the Issue Percentage, therefore Market Maker #1's quote is now 1.00
(10)-1.20 (5).
Next, assume at 12:00:01 an Incoming Order to buy 2 contracts for
1.20 trades against Market Maker #1's quote. Based on this trade, the
Series Percentage Threshold calculation is 2/[(5) + (5)] = 2/10 = 20%.
The Issue Percentage calculation is the sum of Series Percentages
during the time period, or 50% + 20% = 70%.
Finally, presume Market Maker #1's quote is now 1.00 (10)-1.20 (3).
At 12:00:02, Market Maker #1 updates his quote in the XYZ 20 strike
calls to increase his offer size back to 10 contracts, 1.00 (10)-1.20
(10). An incoming Order to buy 6 contracts for 1.20 trades against
Market Maker #1's quote. Based on this trade, the Series Percentage
Threshold calculation: 6/[(10) + (7)] = 6/17 = 35.29%. The Issue
Percentage calculation is the sum of Series Percentages during the time
period, or 50% + 20% + 35.29% = 105.29%. In this scenario, Market Maler
[sic] #1's quotes are removed in all series of XYZ since his setting of
100% over 5 seconds has been exceeded.
Example #3 describes the Volume Threshold. Presume the following
Order Book:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Series of underlying XYZ Size on bid x offer for MM1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
100 Strike Call........................... 300x300
100 Strike Put............................ 50x50
110 Strike Call........................... 200x200
110 Strike Put............................ 150x150
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this example, assume the Specified Time Period designated by the
Market Maker #1 is 10 seconds and the designated number of contracts
permitted for the Volume-Based Threshold is 250 contracts. Assume at
12:00:00, the Market Maker #1 executes all of his offer size, 200
contracts, in the 110 Strike Calls. The System will initiate the
Specified Time Period and for 10 seconds the System will count all
volume executed in series of options class XYZ. If at any point during
that 10 second period, the Market Maker #1 executes additional
contracts in any series of the options class XYZ, those contracts will
be added to the initial execution of 200 contracts. To illustrate,
assume at 12:00:05 the Market Maker #1 executes 60 contracts of his
offer in the 100 Strike Calls. The total volume executed is now 260
contracts. Since that volume exceeds the Market Maker #1's designated
number of contracts for the Volume Threshold (250 contracts), all of
his quotes in all series of the options class XYZ over the Specialized
Quote Feed \4\ will be removed from the System; no further quotes will
be executed until re-entry. The Volume Specified Time Period will be
reset for Market Maker #1 in options class XYZ and Market Maker #1 will
need to send a re-entry indicator in order to re-enter quotes in
options series for options class XYZ into the System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Specialized Quote Feed interface that allows market
makers to connect and send quotes, sweeps and auction responses into
GEMX. Data includes the following: (1) Options Auction Notifications
(e.g., opening imbalance, Flash, PIM, Solicitation and Facilitation
or other information); (2) Options Symbol Directory Messages; (3)
System Event Messages (e.g., start of messages, start of system
hours, start of quoting, start of opening); (4) Option Trading
Action Messages (e.g., halts, resumes); (5) Execution Messages; and
(6) Quote Messages (quote/sweep messages, risk protection triggers
or purge notifications).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation
The Exchange will begin a system migration to Nasdaq INET in Q2 of
2017.\5\ The migration will be on a symbol by symbol basis as specified
by the Exchange in a notice to Members. The Exchange is proposing to
implement this rule change on the INET platform as the symbols migrate
to that platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80432 (April 11,
2017), 82 FR 18191 (April 17, 2017) (SR-ISE-2017-03) (Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, to
Amend Various Rules in Connection with a System Migration to Nasdaq
INET Technology).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \7\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest,
by memorializing, with greater detail, the risk protections available
to market makers. The described Thresholds serve to decrease risk and
increase stability. Additionally, because the Exchange offers these
risk tools to market makers, in order to encourage them to provide as
much liquidity as possible and encourage market making generally, the
proposal removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market system and protects investors and
the public interest. The Exchange believes that amending Rule 804(g) to
add more clarifying text, which explains in greater detail the manner
in which the four Thresholds operate, will bring more transparency to
the rule which serves to protect investors and the public interest,
because market makers will be more informed about the manner in which
the functionality operates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange's proposal to amend the current
Percentage Threshold to: (i) Calculate offsets; and (ii) calculate the
Percentage Threshold during a Specified Time Period and for each side
in a given series, a percentage, by dividing the size of a Market
Maker's quote size executed in a particular series (the numerator) by
the Marker Maker's quote size available at the time of execution plus
the total number of the Market Marker's quote size previously executed
during the unexpired Specified Time Period, will provide Market Makers
with greater precision in calculating quoting risks. The Exchange
believes that providing Market Makers with tools to calculate risk
serves to perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a
national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the
public interest because Market Makers are better able to manage risks
with this risk tool.
The Exchange further represents that its proposal will continue to
operate consistently with the firm quote obligations of a broker-dealer
pursuant
[[Page 28112]]
to Rule 602 of Regulation NMS and that the functionality is mandatory.
Specifically, any interest that is executable against a market maker's
quotes that are received \8\ by the Exchange prior to the time any of
these functionalities are engaged will be automatically executed at the
price up to the market maker's size, regardless of whether such
execution results in executions in excess of the market maker's pre-set
parameters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The time of receipt is the time such message is processed by
the Order Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the proposal will
not impose a burden on intra-market or inter-market competition, rather
it provides market makers with the continued opportunity to avail
themselves of risk tools, [sic] The proposal does not impose a burden
on inter-market competition, because participants may choose to become
market makers on a number of other options exchanges, which may have
similar but not identical features.\9\ The proposed rule change is
meant to continue to protect market makers from inadvertent exposure to
excessive risk. Accordingly, the proposed rule change will have no
impact on competition. The Exchange's proposal to amend the current
Percentage Based risk feature to: (i) Calculate offsets; and (ii)
calculate the Percentage Threshold during a Specified Time Period and
for each side in a given series, a percentage, by dividing the size of
a Market Maker's quote size executed in a particular series (the
numerator) by the Market Maker's quote size available at the time of
execution plus the total number of the Market Marker's quote size
previously executed during the unexpired Specified Time Period,, [sic]
does not impose an undue burden on competition and is non-controversial
because the Exchange offers a Percentage Threshold today. The proposed
changes to the Percentage risk tool simply add more precision to the
existing calculation to permit Market Makers to better control their
risk with respect to quoting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See BATS Rule 21.16, BOX Rules 8100 and 8110, C2 Rule 8.12,
CBOE Rule 8.18, MIAX Rule 612, NYSE MKT Rule 928NY and NYSE Arca
Rule 6.40.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the Exchange is memorializing more detail concerning the
function of the Thresholds with this rule proposal and making clear the
method in which the Percentage risk tool is calculated. The risk tools
will continue to reduce risk for market makers in the event of a
systems issue or due to the occurrence of unusual or unexpected market
activity.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \10\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its filing, ISE requests that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay in order to enable the Exchange to coordinate the
implementation of the proposed rule changes with its planned migration
to the INET platform, which has commenced.\12\ Although the Exchange
proposes certain technical changes to how the risk parameters will
operate (e.g., limiting the Specified Time Period to 30 seconds), the
proposed changes are largely intended to provide more detail about the
operation of the existing risk parameters. Accordingly, the Commission
believes that granting a waiver of the operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest and therefore
designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See supra note 5 and accompanying text.
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest; for the protection of investors; or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2017-42 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-42. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-42 and should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2017.
[[Page 28113]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) and (59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-12893 Filed 6-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P