Certain Sleep-Disordered Breathing Treatment Mask Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion To Terminate the Investigation in its Entirety Based Upon Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of Investigation, 27724 [2017-12521]

Download as PDF 27724 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 115 / Friday, June 16, 2017 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1022] Certain Sleep-Disordered Breathing Treatment Mask Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants’ Unopposed Motion To Terminate the Investigation in its Entirety Based Upon Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 18) granting complainants’ unopposed motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based upon withdrawal of the complaint. SUMMARY: sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A Hughes, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337– TA–1022 on September 22, 2016, based on a complaint filed by ResMed Corp. of San Diego, California; ResMed Inc. of San Diego, California; and ResMed Ltd. of New South Wales, Australia (collectively, ‘‘ResMed’’). 81 FR 65411 (Sept. 22, 2016). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain sleep-disordered breathing VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Jun 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 treatment mask systems and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,960,196 and U.S. Patent No. 9,119,931. The notice of investigation named the following respondents: Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited of Auckland, New Zealand; Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc. of Irvine, California; and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Distribution Inc., of Irvine, California (collectively ‘‘Fisher & Paykel’’). The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not participating in the investigation. On May 16, 2017, ResMed moved to terminate the investigation in its entirety based upon withdrawal of the complaint. Fisher & Paykel filed a response not opposing the motion, but reserving their rights to seek sanctions or appropriate relief. On May 17, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the unopposed motion. The ALJ found that the motion complies with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)) and further found that there are no extraordinary circumstances that warrant denying the motion. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. Thus, the investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 13, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–12521 Filed 6–15–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OMB Number 1121–0329] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection; eComments Requested; Substantive Revision of Previously Approved Collection OJP Solicitation Template Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice. ACTION: 60-Day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), will be submitting the following SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until August 15, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Maria Swineford, (202) 616–0109, Office of Audit, Assessment, and Management, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 810 Seventh Street NW., Washington, DC 20531 or maria.swineford@usdoj.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of this information collection: 1. Type of Information Collection: Substantive Revision to 1121–0329. 2. The Title of the Form/Collection: OJP Solicitation Template. 3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: No form number available. Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice. 4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: The primary respondents are E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 115 (Friday, June 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 27724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12521]



[[Page 27724]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1022]


Certain Sleep-Disordered Breathing Treatment Mask Systems and 
Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion To Terminate the 
Investigation in its Entirety Based Upon Withdrawal of the Complaint; 
Termination of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 18) 
granting complainants' unopposed motion to terminate the investigation 
in its entirety based upon withdrawal of the complaint.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A Hughes, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-
1022 on September 22, 2016, based on a complaint filed by ResMed Corp. 
of San Diego, California; ResMed Inc. of San Diego, California; and 
ResMed Ltd. of New South Wales, Australia (collectively, ``ResMed''). 
81 FR 65411 (Sept. 22, 2016). The complaint alleges violations of 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain sleep-
disordered breathing treatment mask systems and components thereof that 
infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,960,196 and U.S. 
Patent No. 9,119,931. The notice of investigation named the following 
respondents: Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited of Auckland, New 
Zealand; Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc. of Irvine, California; and 
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Distribution Inc., of Irvine, California 
(collectively ``Fisher & Paykel''). The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations is not participating in the investigation.
    On May 16, 2017, ResMed moved to terminate the investigation in its 
entirety based upon withdrawal of the complaint. Fisher & Paykel filed 
a response not opposing the motion, but reserving their rights to seek 
sanctions or appropriate relief.
    On May 17, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the 
unopposed motion. The ALJ found that the motion complies with the 
requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)) and 
further found that there are no extraordinary circumstances that 
warrant denying the motion. None of the parties petitioned for review 
of the ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID. Thus, the 
investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: June 13, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-12521 Filed 6-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.