Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 26912-26914 [2017-12106]

Download as PDF 26912 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices during the meeting, comments must be received no later than 5 p.m. EDT on Wednesday, June 21, 2017, to ensure transmission to the Board prior to the meeting. Comments received after that date and time will be distributed to the members but may not be considered during the meeting. Copies of Board meeting minutes will be available within 90 days of the meeting. Dated: June 6, 2017. Brian Beall, Executive Secretary, United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board. [FR Doc. 2017–12047 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–900] Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 9, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from the People’s Republic of China (the PRC). The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015. For the final results, we continue to find that certain companies covered by this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. DATES: Effective June 12, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of AGENCY: Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5760 and (202) 482–3683, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 9, 2016, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from the PRC.1 We received case and rebuttal briefs with respect to the Preliminary Results. The deadline for the final results of this review is June 7, 2017. We conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades. The diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under subheading 6804.21.00. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 The written description is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Final Determination of No Shipments We preliminarily found that Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd., which have been eligible for separate rates in previous segments of the proceeding and are subject to this review, did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR.3 After the Preliminary Results, we received no comments or additional information with respect to these five companies. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that these five companies did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with our practice, we will issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on our final results. Separate Rates The Department preliminarily determined that 24 respondents are eligible to receive separate rates in this review.4 We made no changes to these determinations for the final results. Changes Since the Preliminary Results We made revisions to the Preliminary Results following our findings in the verification of Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.’s U.S. sales. Final Results of the Review As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015: Margin (percent) asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES Company Bosun Tools Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................................... Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................... Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................. Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................... Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... 1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014– 2015, 81 FR 89045 (December 9, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 2 See the Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China,’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum) dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice, at 4. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 3 See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89045, n.2, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3. 4 See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89045, n.6, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4–8. E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices Margin (percent) Company Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................... Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................... Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................... Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity 5 ............................................................................................................................................................ Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation .............................................................................................................................................. Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................ Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................... Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................... Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................... Sino Tools Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................................................. Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................ Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd 6 ............................................................................................................................. Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................. asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES Assessment Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.7 For a customer or importer of Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., we have calculated a customer/importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rate in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). For the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an antidumping duty assessment rate of 82.05 percent to all entries of subject merchandise that entered the United States during the POR. For all nonselected respondents that received a separate rate, we will instruct CBP to apply an antidumping duty assessment rate of 6.19 percent 8 to all entries of subject merchandise that entered the United States during the POR. For all other companies, we will instruct CBP to apply the antidumping duty assessment rate of the PRC-wide entity, 82.05 percent, to all entries of subject merchandise exported by these companies.9 5 We continue to treat Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd., as a single entity. See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89046, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 2, n.4 for details. 6 Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., is the successor-in-interest to Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 81 FR 20618 (April 8, 2016). 7 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 8 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 5–6. 9 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 737 (‘‘All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below.’’). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, for the five companies that we determined had no reviewable entries of the subject merchandise in this review period, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter’s case number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRCwide entity; (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 26913 Sfmt 4703 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 82.05 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 6.19 deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. These final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: June 6, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Surrogate Country V. Separate Rates VI. Discussion of the Issues a. Adverse Facts Available E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1 26914 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices b. Differential Pricing c. Value-Added Tax d. Surrogate Values VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017–12106 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel Review: Notice of NAFTA Panel Decision United States Section, NAFTA Secretariat, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of NAFTA Panel Decision in the matter of Supercalendered Paper from Canada: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination (Secretariat File Number: USA–CDA–2015–1904–01). AGENCY: On April 13, 2017, the Binational Panel issued its Memorandum Opinion and Order in the matter of Supercalendered Paper from Canada: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination (Final Determination). The Binational Panel affirmed in part and remanded in part the Final Determination by the United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) and copies of the NAFTA Panel Decision are available from the United States Section of the NAFTA Secretariat. SUMMARY: Paul E. Morris, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of Article 1904 of NAFTA provides a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations issued by the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of Mexico. Following a Request for Panel Review, a Binational Panel is composed to review the trade remedy determination being challenged and issue a binding Panel Decision. There are established NAFTA Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (Rules) and the NAFTA Panel Decision has been notified in accordance with Rule 70. For the complete Rules, please see https:// www.nafta-sec-alena.org/Home/Textsof-the-Agreement/Rules-of-Procedure/ Article-1904. Panel Decision: On April 13, 2017, the Binational Panel issued its asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 Memorandum Opinion and Order which affirmed in part and remanded in part the Final Determination by Commerce. The Binational Panel concluded and ordered that Commerce’s Final Determination is remanded for further consideration consistent with the Panel’s decision with respect to (1) the use of Commerce’s ‘‘concurrent subsidies’’ methodology to analyze the provision of ‘‘hot idle’’ funding to Port Hawkesbury Paper LLP (PHP) in a transaction between private parties; (2) Commerce’s conclusion that the Government of Nova Scotia entrusted and directed Nova Scotia Power, Inc. to make a financial contribution by providing electricity; (3) Commerce’s conclusion that Nova Scotia Power, Inc. provided electricity for less than adequate remuneration, addressing both its conclusion that a Tier 1 benchmark was not available and its calculation of a Tier 3 benchmark; (4) the use of Commerce’s ‘‘concurrent subsidies methodology’’ with respect to granting of Forestry Infrastructure monies to New Page Port Hawkesbury (NPPH) prior to its acquisition by Pacific West Commercial Corporation (PWCC); (5) Commerce’s statement that the administrative record contains no evidence of a hostile takeover of Fibrek by Resolute; (6) Commerce’s failure to examine whether the grants to Resolute under the Northern Industrial Electricity Rate and Forestry Sector Prosperity Funds programs were tied to the production of a particular product or to the production of an input product; and (7) Commerce’s use of the same nonrecurring grant as the source for Adverse Facts Available for both recurring and non-recurring grants. The Binational Panel ordered that to the extent not rendered moot by Commerce’s explanation on remand as to why a Tier 1 benchmark for measuring the adequacy of remuneration of Port Hawkesbury’s electricity was not available, Commerce’s October 21, 2016 motion for a voluntary remand to consider whether Commerce should include a separate component for return on equity in its Tier 3 benchmark for measuring the adequacy of remuneration of Port Hawkesbury’s electricity is granted, and the calculation of the benchmark for such purchases is hereby remanded. The Binational Panel further ordered that the Final Determination in all other respects is sustained and directed Commerce to submit its redetermination on remand within 75 days of the date of issue of the NAFTA Panel Decision. For the full Memorandum Opinion and Order, please see https://www.nafta-sec- PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 alena.org/Home/Dispute-Settlement/ Decisions-and-Reports. Dated: June 6, 2017. Paul E. Morris, U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. [FR Doc. 2017–12039 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–845] Antidumping Suspension Agreement on Sugar From Mexico: Rescission of 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 Administrative Reviews Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 1, 2017, the Department notified the producers/ exporters that were signatories to the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on sugar from Mexico (the AD Agreement) of its intent to terminate the AD Agreement unless a new agreement was reached on or before June 5, 2017. The Department subsequently modified its notice of intent to terminate the AD Agreement, stating its continued intent to terminate the AD Agreement unless an amended agreement was reached on or before June 6, 2017. Because the Department intends to terminate the AD Agreement, or, in the alternative, amend the AD Agreement prior to the expiration of the termination period, the two ongoing administrative reviews of the original AD Agreement are now moot, and the Department is rescinding both administrative reviews. DATES: Effective June 5, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally C. Gannon or David Cordell, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–0162 or (202) 482–0408. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background Investigation and Issuance of the AD Agreement On April 17, 2014, the Department initiated an antidumping duty investigation under section 732 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), to determine whether imports of sugar from Mexico are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26912-26914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12106]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-900]


Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-
2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 9, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts 
thereof (diamond sawblades) from the People's Republic of China (the 
PRC). The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2014, through October 
31, 2015. For the final results, we continue to find that certain 
companies covered by this review made sales of subject merchandise at 
less than normal value.

DATES: Effective June 12, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760 and (202) 482-3683, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On December 9, 2016, the Department published the preliminary 
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
diamond sawblades from the PRC.\1\ We received case and rebuttal briefs 
with respect to the Preliminary Results. The deadline for the final 
results of this review is June 7, 2017. We conducted this 
administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's 
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 89045 (December 9, 2016) 
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades. The 
diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under 
subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under subheading 6804.21.00. 
The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ The written description is 
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See the Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond 
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China,'' 
(Issues and Decision Memorandum) dated concurrently with and hereby 
adopted by this notice, at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as 
an appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document 
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 
B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a 
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed 
directly on the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    We preliminarily found that Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., 
Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools 
Co., Ltd., Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and Shanghai 
Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd., which have been eligible for separate rates 
in previous segments of the proceeding and are subject to this review, 
did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the 
POR.\3\ After the Preliminary Results, we received no comments or 
additional information with respect to these five companies. Therefore, 
for the final results, we continue to find that these five companies 
did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the 
POR. Consistent with our practice, we will issue appropriate 
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on our 
final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89045, n.2, and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rates

    The Department preliminarily determined that 24 respondents are 
eligible to receive separate rates in this review.\4\ We made no 
changes to these determinations for the final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89045, n.6, and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4-8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    We made revisions to the Preliminary Results following our findings 
in the verification of Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.'s U.S. sales.

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the 
following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period 
November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Margin
                         Company                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd....................................            6.19
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd..................            6.19
Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd..............            6.19
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd...            6.19
Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd...............            6.19
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd...............            6.19
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd............            6.19

[[Page 26913]]

 
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd................            6.19
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd......            6.19
Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd..............            6.19
Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd....................            6.19
Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity \5\.......................           82.05
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation...................            6.19
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd................            6.19
Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd................            6.19
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd.................            6.19
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd................................            6.19
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd..............            6.19
Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd.............            6.19
Sino Tools Co., Ltd.....................................            6.19
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd........            6.19
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd \6\..........            6.19
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd...................            6.19
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd.....................            6.19
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\7\ For a 
customer or importer of Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., we have calculated a 
customer/importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rate 
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ We continue to treat Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool 
Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu 
Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd., as a single entity. See 
Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89046, and accompanying Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum at 2, n.4 for details.
    \6\ Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., is the 
successor-in-interest to Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. See 
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances 
Review, 81 FR 20618 (April 8, 2016).
    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity, we will instruct CBP to 
apply an antidumping duty assessment rate of 82.05 percent to all 
entries of subject merchandise that entered the United States during 
the POR. For all non-selected respondents that received a separate 
rate, we will instruct CBP to apply an antidumping duty assessment rate 
of 6.19 percent \8\ to all entries of subject merchandise that entered 
the United States during the POR. For all other companies, we will 
instruct CBP to apply the antidumping duty assessment rate of the PRC-
wide entity, 82.05 percent, to all entries of subject merchandise 
exported by these companies.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 5-6.
    \9\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 737 (``All firms listed 
below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the 
administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as 
appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as 
described below.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases 
submitted by Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., the Department will instruct CBP to 
liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, for the five 
companies that we determined had no reviewable entries of the subject 
merchandise in this review period, any suspended entries that entered 
under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will 
be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.
    We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the 
date of publication of the final results of review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as 
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject 
merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate 
rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these 
final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for 
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not 
listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this 
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that 
have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; (4) for all non-PRC 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC 
exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit 
requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject 
to sanction.
    These final results of review are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: June 6, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Surrogate Country
V. Separate Rates
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    a. Adverse Facts Available

[[Page 26914]]

    b. Differential Pricing
    c. Value-Added Tax
    d. Surrogate Values
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2017-12106 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P