Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 26942-26943 [2017-12091]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
26942
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices
Project: Project—Division of State
Programs—Management Reporting
Tool (DSP–MRT) (OMB No. 0930–
0354)—Revision
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA)’s Center for Substance
Abuse Prevention (CSAP) aims to
address two of SAMHSA’s top
substance abuse prevention priorities:
Underage drinking (UAD; age 12 to 20)
and prescription drug misuse and abuse
(PDM; age 12 to 25) through the
Division of State Program—Monitoring
and Reporting Tool. This data collection
will allow all DSP programs to report
into a standard tool that aligns with the
Strategic Prevention Framework model.
This request for data collection includes
a revision from a previously approved
OMB instrument formally known as
Partnerships for Success-Management
and Reporting Tool.
Monitoring data on SPF model will
allow SAMHSA project officers to
systematically collect data to monitor
their grant program performance and
outcomes along with grantee technical
assistance needs. In addition to
assessing activities related to the SPF
steps, the performance monitoring
instruments covered in this statement
collect data to assess the following
grantee required specific performance
measures:
• Number of training and technical
assistance activities per funded
community provided by the grantee to
support communities;
• Reach of training and technical
assistance activities (numbers served)
provided by the grantee;
• Percentage of subrecipient
communities that submit data to the
grantee data system;
• Number of sub-recipient
communities that improved on one or
more targeted NOMs indicators
(Outcome);
• Number of grantees who integrate
Prescription Drug Monitoring Data into
their program needs assessment.
Changes to this package include the
following:
• Standard language for all DSP–MRT
questions;
• New disparities module to align
with SAMHSA’s monitoring
requirements;
• Updated technical assistance
section;
• Deletion of cost questions specific
to funding amounts and in-kind
resources;
• Deletion of advisory council and
other workgroup sub-committee
questions;
• Addition of Section A specific to
SPF-Rx questions;
• Addition of Section B specific to
PDO questions;
ANNUALIZED DATA COLLECTION BURDEN
Number of
respondents
Instrument
Responses
per
respondent
Total
number of
responses
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
117
25
23
4
2
4
468
63
100
3
1
1
1,404
42
100
FY2020 Total ................................................................
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Standard DSP Monitoring Tool ............................................
Section A: Rx .......................................................................
Section B: PDO ....................................................................
117
........................
631
........................
1,546
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by July 12, 2017 to the SAMHSA
Desk Officer at the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). To
ensure timely receipt of comments, and
to avoid potential delays in OMB’s
receipt and processing of mail sent
through the U.S. Postal Service,
commenters are encouraged to submit
their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Although commenters are encouraged to
send their comments via email,
commenters may also fax their
comments to: 202–395–7285.
Commenters may also mail them to:
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2017–12090 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Project: Mental Health Block Grant Ten
Percent Set Aside Evaluation of First
Episode Psychosis—NEW
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) is directed by Congress
through its FY 2016 Omnibus bill,
Public Law 114–113, to set aside ten
percent of the Mental Health Block
Grant (MHBG) allocation for each state
to support evidence-based programs that
provide treatment for those with early
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
serious mental illness (SMI) and a first
episode psychosis (FEP)—an increase
from the previous five percent set aside.
The purpose of this 3-year evaluation
is to assess the relationship between
fidelity of selected coordinated specialty
care (CSC) programs supported with
Mental Health Block Grant (MHBG) Ten
Percent Set Aside funding and
participant outcomes. There are
approximately 250 sites implementing
CSC programs with MHBG ten percent
set aside funding. All 250 sites will be
asked to report on their implementation
through an online survey. Up to 32 CSC
sites across the nation will be recruited
to participate in a process and outcome
evaluation. The data collection activities
for the Mental Health Block Grant Ten
Percent Set Aside Evaluation will
include the following six data collection
tools:
• Site Survey: This is a one-time
online survey with site directors of all
250 centers using MHBG ten percent set
aside funding (not just those included in
the evaluation). The survey focuses on
how centers across the U.S. are
providing services to individuals with
First Episode Psychosis (FEP) in their
communities.
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
26943
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices
• State Mental Health Authority Interview:
This is a one-time semi-structured interview
with state mental health leadership in the
states where the 32 sites in the evaluation are
located. The interview focuses on their
thoughts and opinions about context in
which CSC programs are implemented
within their state and the state’s role in the
implementation of the CSC programs.
• Agency Director/Administrator
Interview: This semi-structured interview
will be conducted twice with Agency
Director/Administrators at each of the 32
CSC sites in the evaluation about the
successes and challenges involved in
implementing the CSC program.
• Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Staff
Interview: This semi-structured interview
will be conducted twice with CSC Staff at
each of the 32 CSC sites in the evaluation
about the successes and challenges involved
in implementing the CSC program.
• Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC)
Participant Interview: This semi-structured
interview will be conducted twice with
participants involved in programs at the 32
CSC sites in the evaluation. The purpose of
the interview is to gather participant input on
how CSC programs are operating and their
thoughts and opinions about successes and
challenges while participating in the CSC
program.
• Fidelity Interview: This interview will be
conducted twice during the evaluation with
up to four CSC staff at each site. The phone
interview is designed to be used in
conjunction with the First Episode Psychosis
Fidelity Scale (FEPS–FS) to examine whether
elements of CSC are implemented at the sites.
In addition, each site will provide the
evaluation team with administrative
data on participant demographics and
outcomes (e.g., employment status,
educational status, diagnosis, living
situation, quality of life, symptoms).
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Respondent
State Department of Mental Health Representative: Telephone Interview ................................................................
CSC Site Directors across the country: Online survey .......
Evaluation CSC Site: Program Director on-site interview ...
Evaluation CSC Site: Program Staff on-site interview ........
Evaluation CSC Site: Program Staff Fidelity Telephone
Interview ...........................................................................
Evaluation CSC Site: Program Staff data submission ........
Evaluation CSC Site: Program Participant on-site interview
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2017–12091 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
17:28 Jun 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
2.0
0.2
2.0
2.0
64
50
128
384
64
32
128
4
18
1
256
576
128
4.0
5.0
1.0
1,024
2,880
128
762
........................
1,498
........................
4,658
[Investigation No. 731–TA–638 (Fourth
Review)]
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India
DETERMINATION
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel wire rod from India would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
BACKGROUND
The Commission, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),
instituted this review on December 1,
2016 (81 FR 86728) and determined on
March 6, 2017 that it would conduct an
expedited review (82 FR 16231, April 3,
2017).
The Commission made this
determination pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
Frm 00041
Total burden
(in hours)
32
250
64
192
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
PO 00000
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
1
1
1
1
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Total
responses
32
250
64
192
Total ..............................................................................
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by July 12, 2017 to the SAMHSA
Desk Officer at the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). To
ensure timely receipt of comments, and
to avoid potential delays in OMB’s
receipt and processing of mail sent
through the U.S. Postal Service,
commenters are encouraged to submit
their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Although commenters are encouraged to
send their comments via email,
commenters may also fax their
comments to: 202–395–7285.
Commenters may also mail them to:
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
Number of
responses per
respondent
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
completed and filed its determination in
this review on June 6, 2017. The views
of the Commission are contained in
USITC Publication 4695 (June 2017),
entitled Stainless Steel Wire Rod from
India: Investigation No. 731–TA–638
(Fourth Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 6, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–12037 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–951]
Certain Lithium Metal Oxide Cathode
Materials, Lithium-Ion Batteries for
Power Tool Products Containing
Same, and Power Tool Products With
Lithium-Ion Batteries Containing
Same; Notice of the Commission’s
Determination To Rescind a Limited
Exclusion Order
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to rescind
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26942-26943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12091]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: Mental Health Block Grant Ten Percent Set Aside Evaluation of
First Episode Psychosis--NEW
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) is directed by Congress through its FY 2016 Omnibus bill,
Public Law 114-113, to set aside ten percent of the Mental Health Block
Grant (MHBG) allocation for each state to support evidence-based
programs that provide treatment for those with early serious mental
illness (SMI) and a first episode psychosis (FEP)--an increase from the
previous five percent set aside.
The purpose of this 3-year evaluation is to assess the relationship
between fidelity of selected coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs
supported with Mental Health Block Grant (MHBG) Ten Percent Set Aside
funding and participant outcomes. There are approximately 250 sites
implementing CSC programs with MHBG ten percent set aside funding. All
250 sites will be asked to report on their implementation through an
online survey. Up to 32 CSC sites across the nation will be recruited
to participate in a process and outcome evaluation. The data collection
activities for the Mental Health Block Grant Ten Percent Set Aside
Evaluation will include the following six data collection tools:
Site Survey: This is a one-time online survey with site
directors of all 250 centers using MHBG ten percent set aside funding
(not just those included in the evaluation). The survey focuses on how
centers across the U.S. are providing services to individuals with
First Episode Psychosis (FEP) in their communities.
[[Page 26943]]
State Mental Health Authority Interview: This is a one-
time semi-structured interview with state mental health leadership
in the states where the 32 sites in the evaluation are located. The
interview focuses on their thoughts and opinions about context in
which CSC programs are implemented within their state and the
state's role in the implementation of the CSC programs.
Agency Director/Administrator Interview: This semi-
structured interview will be conducted twice with Agency Director/
Administrators at each of the 32 CSC sites in the evaluation about
the successes and challenges involved in implementing the CSC
program.
Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Staff Interview: This
semi-structured interview will be conducted twice with CSC Staff at
each of the 32 CSC sites in the evaluation about the successes and
challenges involved in implementing the CSC program.
Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Participant Interview:
This semi-structured interview will be conducted twice with
participants involved in programs at the 32 CSC sites in the
evaluation. The purpose of the interview is to gather participant
input on how CSC programs are operating and their thoughts and
opinions about successes and challenges while participating in the
CSC program.
Fidelity Interview: This interview will be conducted
twice during the evaluation with up to four CSC staff at each site.
The phone interview is designed to be used in conjunction with the
First Episode Psychosis Fidelity Scale (FEPS-FS) to examine whether
elements of CSC are implemented at the sites.
In addition, each site will provide the evaluation team with
administrative data on participant demographics and outcomes (e.g.,
employment status, educational status, diagnosis, living situation,
quality of life, symptoms).
Table 1--Estimated Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Number of Total burden per Total burden
Respondent respondents responses per responses response (in (in hours)
respondent hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Department of Mental 32 1 32 2.0 64
Health Representative:
Telephone Interview............
CSC Site Directors across the 250 1 250 0.2 50
country: Online survey.........
Evaluation CSC Site: Program 64 1 64 2.0 128
Director on-site interview.....
Evaluation CSC Site: Program 192 1 192 2.0 384
Staff on-site interview........
Evaluation CSC Site: Program 64 4 256 4.0 1,024
Staff Fidelity Telephone
Interview......................
Evaluation CSC Site: Program 32 18 576 5.0 2,880
Staff data submission..........
Evaluation CSC Site: Program 128 1 128 1.0 128
Participant on-site interview..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... 762 .............. 1,498 .............. 4,658
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by July 12, 2017 to the SAMHSA
Desk Officer at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To ensure timely receipt of
comments, and to avoid potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing
of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, commenters are encouraged
to submit their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. Although commenters are encouraged to send
their comments via email, commenters may also fax their comments to:
202-395-7285. Commenters may also mail them to: Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, New Executive
Office Building, Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2017-12091 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
