Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review in Part; 2015-2016, 26055-26060 [2017-11665]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
If either Borusan’s or Toscelik’s
weighted-average dumping margin is
not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent) in the final results of this
review, we will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of
the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of the
sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). Where either a
respondent’s weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis, or an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
For the companies which were not
selected for individual review, we will
assign an assessment rate based on the
methodology described in the ‘‘Rate for
Non-Examined Companies’’ section,
above.
With respect to Erbosan, Borusan
Birlesik, Borusan Gemlik, Borusan
Ihracat, Borusan Ithicat, and Tubeco, if
we continue to find that these
companies had no shipments of subject
merchandise in the final results, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate any existing
entries of merchandise produced by
these companies, but exported by other
parties, at the rate for the intermediate
reseller, if available, or at the all-others
rate.18
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for Toscelik will
be zero, unless there is change in
Toscelik’s dumping margin in the final
results of this review; (2) the cash
deposit rate for Borusan will be equal to
the weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
review, except if the rate is zero or de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash
deposit rate will be zero; (3) for other
manufacturers and exporters covered in
a prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which that manufacturer
18 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian
Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923
(May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal
from the Russian Federation: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
56989 (September 17, 2010).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:52 Jun 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
or exporter participated; (4) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
then the cash deposit rate will be the
rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the manufacturer of subject
merchandise; and (5) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 14.74
percent, the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation.19 These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221(1)(b)(4).
Dated: May 31, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
5. Rates for Non-Examined Companies
6. Comparisons to Normal Value
7. Product Comparisons
8. Date of Sale
9. Export Price
10. Normal Value
11. Currency Conversion
12. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–11666 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
19 See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon
Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from
Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26055
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–967]
Aluminum Extrusions From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission of Review in Part; 2015–
2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
aluminum extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). The period of
review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through
April 30, 2016. These preliminary
results cover 191 companies and the
PRC-wide entity for which an
administrative review was initiated. The
PRC-wide entity did not respond to the
Department’s initial quantity and value
questionnaires (Q&Vs), and therefore the
Department is preliminarily applying
adverse facts available (AFA) to the
PRC-wide entity. The Department
selected the following companies as
mandatory respondents: Kam Kiu
Aluminium Products Sdn. Bhd. (Kam
Kiu) and tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
(tenKsolar). The Department
preliminarily determines that Kam Kiu
did not demonstrate eligibility for a
separate rate and is, therefore, part of
the PRC-wide entity. The Department
further preliminarily determines that
because we lack sufficient record
information to allow the Department to
calculate a margin for tenKsolar’s
reported sales of subject merchandise
into the United States during the POR,
the rate applied to tenKsolar’s
merchandise upon entry continues to be
the AD rate applied to tenKsolar, except
to adjust for countervailable duty (CVD)
subsidies determined under the parallel
aluminum extrusions CVD order. If
these preliminary results are adopted in
the final results of this review, we will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Scott or Mark Flessner, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
26056
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
(202) 482–2657 or (202) 482–6312,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 7, 2016, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
administrative review of the AD order
on aluminum extrusions from the PRC 1
for the period May 1, 2015, through
April 30, 2016, covering 191 companies
and the PRC-wide entity.2
For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this administrative review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content. A list of topics
included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix
I to this notice.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the
Order is aluminum extrusions which are
shapes and forms, produced by an
extrusion process, made from aluminum
alloys having metallic elements
corresponding to the alloy series
designations published by The
Aluminum Association commencing
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or
proprietary equivalents or other
certifying body equivalents).4
Imports of the subject merchandise
are provided for under the following
categories of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS):
6603.90.8100, 7616.99.51, 8479.89.94,
8481.90.9060, 8481.90.9085,
9031.90.9195, 8424.90.9080,
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
1 See
Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR
30650 (May 26, 2011) (the Order).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
44260 (July 7, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from
the People’s Republic of China; 2015–2016,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
4 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for a
complete description of the scope of the Order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:52 Jun 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
9405.99.4020, 9031.90.90.95,
7616.10.90.90, 7609.00.00, 7610.10.00,
7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71,
7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30,
7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90,
7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50,
8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20,
9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00,
7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10,
7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30,
7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30,
7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00,
8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60,
8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00,
8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60,
8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15,
8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50,
8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10,
8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65,
8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45,
8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85,
8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00,
8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00,
8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45,
8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50,
8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00,
8422.90.06.40, 8473.30.20.00,
8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00,
8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80,
8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00,
8515.90.20.00, 8516.90.50.00,
8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00,
8529.90.73.00, 8529.90.97.60,
8536.90.80.85, 8538.10.00.00,
8543.90.88.80, 8708.29.50.60,
8708.80.65.90, 8803.30.00.60,
9013.90.50.00, 9013.90.90.00,
9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40,
9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85,
9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80,
9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10,
9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05,
9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80,
9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10,
9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05,
9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80,
9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15,
9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.41,
9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61,
9506.11.40.80, 9506.51.40.00,
9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40,
9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10,
9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30,
9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20,
9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00,
9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80,
9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00,
9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00,
9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00,
9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50.
The subject merchandise entered as
parts of other aluminum products may
be classifiable under the following
additional Chapter 76 subheadings:
7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and
7616.99, as well as under other HTSUS
chapters. In addition, fin evaporator
coils may be classifiable under HTSUS
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and
8418.99.80.60. While HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
Order is dispositive.
Extension of Deadlines for Preliminary
Results
On January 3, 2017, the Department
extended the period of time for issuing
the preliminary results of this review
until May 11, 2017.5 On May 5, 2017,
the Department again extended the
period of time for issuing the
preliminary results of this review until
May 31, 2017.6
Rescission of Administrative Review in
Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
based on the timely withdrawal of the
requests for review, we are partially
rescinding this administrative review
with respect to 181 of the 191
companies named in the Initiation
Notice.7 See Appendix II for a list of
these companies.8
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our preliminary results, see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination Regarding
tenKsolar’s Reported Sales
Based on information submitted by
tenKsolar, we preliminarily find that we
lack sufficient record information to
allow the Department to calculate a
margin for tenKsolar’s reported sales of
subject merchandise during the POR.9
Accordingly, we preliminarily
determine that the rate which should be
applied to tenKsolar is the AD rate
applied to its merchandise upon entry.
Consistent with our practice in nonmarket economy (NME) cases, the
Department is not rescinding this
review with respect to tenKsolar, but
intends to complete the review of
tenKsolar and issue appropriate
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from
the People’s Republic of China: Extension of
Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated January 3,
2017.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from
the People’s Republic of China: Additional
Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
May 5, 2017.
7 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44262–44265.
8 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for
further details.
9 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 10–
12.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
instructions to CBP based on the final
results of this review.10
Separate Rates
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
In the Initiation Notice, we informed
parties of the opportunity to request a
separate rate.11 In proceedings involving
NME countries, the Department begins
with a rebuttable presumption that all
companies within the NME country are
subject to government control and, thus,
should be assigned a single weightedaverage dumping margin. It is the
Department’s policy to assign all
exporters of merchandise subject to an
administrative review involving an
NME country this single rate unless an
exporter can demonstrate that it is
sufficiently independent so as to be
entitled to a separate rate. Companies
that wanted to be considered for a
separate rate in this review were
required to timely file a separate rate
application (SRA) or a separate rate
certification (SRC) to demonstrate their
eligibility for a separate rate. SRAs and
SRCs were due to the Department
within 30 calendar days of the
publication of the Initiation Notice.12
Mandatory respondent Kam Kiu
submitted a SRC,13 but did not respond
to any section of the Department’s
antidumping questionnaire; instead,
Kam Kiu withdrew from active
participation as a mandatory
respondent.14 Accordingly, the
Department cannot analyze or verify the
veracity of Kam Kiu’s claims of being
separate from the PRC-wide entity for
purposes of its export activities. As a
result, we preliminarily determine that
Kam Kiu did not demonstrate its
eligibility for a separate rate in this
review.15 Mandatory respondent
tenKsolar submitted a SRC,16 as well as
timely responses to each section of the
Department’s antidumping
questionnaire to which it was required
10 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011).
11 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44261–2.
12 Id.
13 See Kam Kiu Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions
from the People’s Republic of China: Separate Rate
Certification, dated August 3, 2016.
14 See Kam Kiu Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions
from the People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal as
a Mandatory Respondent, dated February 14, 2017.
15 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44262 (‘‘For
exporters and producers who submit a separate-rate
status application or certification and subsequently
are selected as mandatory respondents, these
exporters and producers will no longer be eligible
for separate rate status unless they respond to all
parts of the questionnaire as mandatory
respondents.’’).
16 See tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions
from the People’s Republic of China: Separate Rate
Certification, dated August 3, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:52 Jun 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
to submit a response.17 Based on the
information on the record, we
preliminarily determine that tenKsolar
demonstrated its eligibility for a
separate rate in this review.
The Department did not receive a
SRA or SRC from any of the other
entities remaining under review. As a
result, we preliminarily determine that
the following entities are not eligible for
a separate rate in this administrative
review: (1) Atlas Integrated
Manufacturing Ltd.; (2) Classic &
Contemporary Inc.; (3) Dongguan
Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co.,
Ltd.; (4) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products
Co., Ltd.; (5) Taishan City Kam Kiu
Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (6)
Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium Industry
Engineering Co. Ltd.; (7) Sincere Profit
Limited; and (8) Suzhou New Hongji
Precision Part Co.18
Application of Adverse Facts Available
The Department preliminarily
determines that the use of facts
otherwise available is warranted with
respect to the PRC-wide entity, in
accordance with sections 776(a)(2)(A)
and (C) of the Act. The Department
issued a Q&V questionnaire to the PRCwide entity on December 2, 2016; 19
however, the PRC-wide entity did not
respond to the Department’s Q&V
questionnaire. As a result, we
preliminarily find that the PRC-wide
entity withheld necessary information
that was requested by the Department,
significantly impeding the proceeding.
Further, pursuant to section 776(b) of
the Act, the Department preliminarily
determines that, because the PRC-wide
entity failed to cooperate by not acting
to the best of its ability to comply with
the Department’s requests for
information, an adverse inference is
warranted.
PRC-Wide Entity
We preliminarily find that the
following entities are part of the PRCwide entity in this administrative
review because they failed to submit a
Q&V response, a SRA, a SRC, or (in the
case of Kam Kiu) were selected as a
17 See tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions
from the People’s Republic of China: Section A
Questionnaire Response, dated February 23, 2017;
see also tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions
from the People’s Republic of China: Section C and
D Questionnaire Response, dated March 9, 2017.
18 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 14.
19 See Department Letter to Liu Fang, First
Secretary, Embassy of the People’s Republic of
China, dated December 2, 2016. See also
Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Order on
Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic
of China: Issuance of Quantity and Value
Questionnaire to the PRC-wide Entity,’’ dated
December 8, 2016 (containing Federal Express
shipment and delivery confirmation).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26057
mandatory respondent and failed to
respond to the AD questionnaire: (1)
Kam Kiu; (2) Atlas Integrated
Manufacturing Ltd.; (3) Classic &
Contemporary Inc.; (4) Dongguan
Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co.,
Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products
Co., Ltd.; (6) Taishan City Kam Kiu
Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (7)
Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium Industry
Engineering Co. Ltd.; (8) Sincere Profit
Limited; and (9) Suzhou New Hongji
Precision Part Co.
The Department’s change in policy
regarding conditional review of the
PRC-wide entity applies to this
administrative review.20 Under this
policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be
under review unless a party specifically
requests, or the Department selfinitiates, a review of the entity. The
petitioner 21 requested a review of the
PRC-wide entity in the instant review;
therefore, the PRC-wide entity is
currently under review.
Adjustments for Countervailable
Subsidies
Because no mandatory respondent
established eligibility for an adjustment
under section 777A(f) of the Act for
countervailable domestic subsidies, for
these preliminary results, the
Department did not make an adjustment
pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act
for countervailable domestic subsidies
for the separate-rate recipients.
Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the
Act, we made an adjustment for
countervailable export subsidies for
tenKsolar. We calculated this
adjustment as the simple average of the
countervailable export subsidies
determined for the mandatory
respondents in the 2014 (i.e., most
recently completed) CVD administrative
review 22 and deducted this amount
from the weighted-average dumping
margin assigned to tenKsolar. 23 The
20 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013).
21 The petitioner is the Aluminum Extrusions Fair
Trade Committee, composed of the following
members: Aerolite Extrusion Company; Alexandria
Extrusion Company; William L. Bonnell Company,
Inc.; Frontier Aluminum Corporation; Futura
Industries Corporation; Hydro Aluminum North
America, Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum Corporation;
Profile Extrusion Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.;
and Western Extrusions Corporation.
22 Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results and Partial
Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2014, 81 FR 92778 (December 20, 2016).
23 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 12
and 17–18.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
26058
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
adjusted rate for tenKsolar is 85.96
percent.
Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the
Act, we also made an adjustment for
countervailable export subsidies for the
PRC-wide entity. We adjusted the PRCwide entity cash deposit rate by the
lowest countervailable export subsidy
determined for the mandatory
respondents in the 2014 (i.e., most
recently completed) CVD administrative
review.24
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
2015–2016 POR:
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Exporter
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. ...
PRC-wide Entity
Margin
adjusted for
liquidation
and cash
deposit
purposes
(percent)
86.01
86.01
85.96
85.96
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Additionally, as explained above, the
Department preliminarily determines
that the following companies are part of
the PRC-wide entity: (1) Kam Kiu; (2)
Atlas Integrated Manufacturing Ltd.; (3)
Classic & Contemporary Inc.; (4)
Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware
Industrial Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Jackson
Travel Products Co., Ltd.; (6) Taishan
City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co.,
Ltd.; (7) Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium
Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (8)
Sincere Profit Limited; and (9) Suzhou
New Hongji Precision Part Co.
Disclosure and Public Comment
Normally, the Department discloses to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with its
preliminary results within five days of
its public announcement or, if there is
no public announcement, within five
days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). However, because the
Department did not calculate weightedaverage dumping margins for either of
the individually examined companies,
Kam Kiu and tenKsolar, in this review,
nor for the PRC-wide entity, there are no
calculations to disclose.
Interested parties may submit case
briefs no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of these preliminary
results of review.25 Rebuttal briefs,
limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, may be filed no later than five
24 See
25 See
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:52 Jun 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
days after the case briefs are filed.26
Parties who submit arguments are
requested to submit with the argument
(a) a statement of the issue, (b) a brief
summary of the argument, and (c) a
table of authorities.27
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 30 days of publication of
this notice.28 Hearing requests should
contain the following information: (1)
The party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of the issues
to be discussed. Oral presentations will
be limited to issues raised in the case
and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a
hearing is made, parties will be notified
of the time and date for the hearing to
be held at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230.29
All submissions, with limited
exceptions, must be filed electronically
using ACCESS.30 An electronically filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by the Department’s
electronic records system, ACCESS, by
5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due
date. Documents excepted from the
electronic submission requirements
must be filed manually (i.e., in paper
form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in
Room 18022 and stamped with the date
and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the
due date.31
Unless otherwise extended, the
Department intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
which will include the results of our
analysis of all issues raised in the case
briefs, within 120 days of publication of
these preliminary results in the Federal
Register, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of
this review, the Department will
determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.32 The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this
review.
We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate
entries containing subject merchandise
exported by the PRC-wide entity at the
PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the
26 See
19 CFR 351.309(d).
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
28 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
29 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
30 See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
31 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
32 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
27 See
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department determines that an exporter
under review had no shipments of the
subject merchandise, any suspended
entries that entered under that
exporter’s case number will be
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.33
For the companies for which this
review is rescinded, antidumping duties
shall be assessed at rates equal to the
cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). We will instruct
CBP accordingly.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements for estimated antidumping
duties, when imposed, will apply to all
shipments of subject merchandise from
the PRC entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the publication of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) If
the companies preliminarily determined
to be eligible for a separate rate receive
a separate rate in the final results of this
administrative review, their cash
deposit rate will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
review, as adjusted for domestic and
export subsidies (except, if that rate is
de minimis, then the cash deposit rate
will be zero); (2) for any previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters that are not under review
in this segment of the proceeding but
that received a separate rate in the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding;
(3) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be that for the PRCwide entity; (4) for the PRC-wide entity,
the cash deposit rate will be 85.96
percent; 34 and (5) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter.
These cash deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
33 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
34 This rate is adjusted for export subsidies.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing notice
of these preliminary results in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: May 31, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum:
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Respondent Selection
V. Rescission of Administrative Review in
Part
VI. Preliminary Determination Regarding
tenKsolar’s Reported Sales
VII. NME Country
VIII. Separate Rates
IX. PRC-Wide Entity
X. Application of Facts Available and Use of
Adverse Inference
XI. The PRC-Wide Entity
XII. Adjustments for Countervailable
Subsidies
XIII. Conclusion
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Appendix II
Companies for Which This Administrative
Review Is Being Rescinded
1. Acro Import and Export Co.
2. Activa International Inc.
3. Allied Maker Limited
4. Alnan Aluminium Co., Ltd.
5. Aluminicaste Fundicion de Mexico
6. AMC Ltd.
7. Belton (Asia) Development Ltd.
8. Birchwoods (Lin’an) Leisure Products Co.,
Ltd.
9. Bolnar Hong Kong Ltd.
10. Bracalente Metal Products (Suzhou) Co.,
Ltd.
11. Changshu Changshen Aluminium
Products Co., Ltd.
12. Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co.,
Ltd.
13. Changzhou Tenglong Auto Parts Co., Ltd.
14. China Square
15. China Square Industrial Co.
16. China Zhongwang Holdings, Ltd.
17. Chiping One Stop Industrial & Trade Co.,
Ltd.
18. Clear Sky Inc.
19. Cosco (J.M.) Aluminium Co., Ltd.
20. Dalian Huacheng Aquatic Products
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:52 Jun 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
21. Dalian Liwang Trade Co., Ltd.
22. Danfoss Micro Channel Heat Exchanger
(Jia Xing) Co., Ltd.
23. Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd.
24. Dongguan Dazhan Metal Co., Ltd.
25. Dragonluxe Limited
26. Dynabright Int’l Group (HK) Limited
27. Dynamic Technologies China Ltd.
28. Ever Extend Ent. Ltd.
29. Fenghua Metal Product Factory
30. First Union Property Limited
31. FookShing Metal & Plastic Co. Ltd.
32. Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou New & HighTech Industrial Development Zone
33. Foshan City Nanhai Hongjia Aluminum
Alloy Co., Ltd.
34. Foshan Golden Source Aluminum
Products Co., Ltd.
35. Foshan Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd.
36. Foshan Jinlan Aluminum Co. Ltd.
37. Foshan JMA Aluminum Company
Limited
38. Foshan Sanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co.,
Ltd.
39. Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical
Appliances Co., Ltd.
40. Foshan Yong Li Jian Aluminum Co., Ltd.
41. Fujian Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
42. Fuzhou Sunmodo New Energy
Equipment
43. Genimex Shanghai, Ltd.
44. Global PMX Dongguan Co., Ltd.
45. Global Point Technology (Far East)
Limited
46. Gold Mountain International
Development Limited
47. Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube
Group, Inc.
48. Gran Cabrio Capital Pte. Ltd.
49. Gree Electric Appliances
50. GT Capital Pte. Ltd.
51. Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong
Kong) Ltd.
52. Guang Ya Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd.
53. Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd.
54. Guangdong Jianmei Aluminum Profile
Company Limited
55. Guangdong JMA Aluminum Profile
Factory (Group) Co., Ltd.
56. Guangdong Nanhai Foodstuffs Imp. &
Exp. Co., Ltd.
57. Guangdong Weiye Aluminum Factory
Co., Ltd.
58. Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical
Appliances Co., Ltd.
59. Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd.
60. Guangdong Xin Wei Aluminum Products
Co., Ltd.
61. Guangdong Yonglijian Aluminum Co.,
Ltd.
62. Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum
Company Limited
63. Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System
Engineering Co., Ltd.
64. Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting
Hardware Products Co., Ltd.
65. Hangzhou Xingyi Metal Products Co.,
Ltd.
66. Hanwood Enterprises Limited
67. Hanyung Alcoba Co., Ltd.
68. Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd.
69. Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
70. Hao Mei Aluminum Co., Ltd.
71. Hao Mei Aluminum International Co.,
Ltd.
72. Hebei Xusen Wire Mesh Products Co.,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26059
Ltd.
73. Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances
Co., Ltd.
74. Hong Kong Gree Electric Appliances
Sales Limited
75. Hong Kong Modern Non-Ferrous Metal
76. Honsense Development Company
77. Hui Mei Gao Aluminum Foshan Co., Ltd.
78. IDEX Dinglee Technology (Tianjin) Co.,
Ltd.
79. IDEX Technology Suzhou Co., Ltd.
80. IDEX Health
81. Innovative Aluminium (Hong Kong)
Limited
82. iSource Asia
83. Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.
84. Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.
85. Jiangmen Jianghai District Foreign
Economic Enterprise Corp. Ltd.
86. Jiangmen Jianghai Foreign Ent. Gen.
87. Jiangmen Qunxing Hardware Diecasting
Co., Ltd.
88. Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd.
89. Jiangyin Suncitygaylin
90. Jiangyin Trust International Inc.
91. Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows
Co., Ltd.
92. Jiaxing Taixin Metal Products Co., Ltd.
93. Jiuyan Co., Ltd.
94. JMA (HK) Company Limited
95. Justhere Co., Ltd.
96. Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co.,
Ltd.
97. Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd.
98. Kong Ah International Company Limited
99. Kromet International, Inc.
100. Kunshan Giant Light Metal Technology
Co., Ltd.
101. Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd.
102. Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile
Co. Ltd.
103. Longkou Donghai Trade Co., Ltd.
104. Metaltek Group Co., Ltd.
105. Metaltek Metal Industry Co., Ltd.
106. Midea Air Conditioning Equipment Co.,
Ltd.
107. Midea International Trading Co., Ltd.
108. Midea International Training Co., Ltd.
109. Miland Luck Limited
110. Nanhai Textiles Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
111. New Asia Aluminum & Stainless Steel
Product Co., Ltd.
112. New Zhongya Aluminum Factory
113. Nidec Sankyo (Zhejang) Corporation
114. Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd.
115. Ningbo Coaster International Co., Ltd.
116. Ningbo Hi Tech Reliable Manufacturing
Company
117. Ningbo Ivy Daily Commodity Co., Ltd.
118. Ningbo Yili Import and Export Co., Ltd.
119. North China Aluminum Co., Ltd.
120. North Fenghua Aluminum Ltd.
121. Northern States Metals
122. PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited
123. Pengcheng Aluminum Enterprise Inc.
124. Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited
125. Permasteelisa South China Factory
126. Pingguo Aluminum Company Limited
127. Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd.
128. Popular Plastics Co., Ltd.
129. Press Metal International Ltd.
130. Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd.
131. Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
132. Shangdong Huasheng Pesticide
Machinery Co.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
26060
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
133. Shangdong Nanshan Aluminum Co.,
Ltd.
134. Shanghai Automobile Air Conditioner
Accessories Ltd.
135. Shanghai Canghai Aluminum Tube
Packaging Co., Ltd.
136. Shanghai Dongsheng Metal
137. Shanghai Shen Hang Imp & Exp Co.,
Ltd.
138. Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum
Alloy Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
139. Shenzhen Hudson Technology
Development Co.
140. Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd.
141. Sihui Shi Guo Yao Aluminum Co., Ltd.
142. Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co.,
Ltd.
143. Southwest Aluminum (Group) Co., Ltd.
144. Suzhou JRP Import & Export Co., Ltd.
145. Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd.
146. Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
147. Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing
Corporation, Ltd.
148. Taizhou United Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
149. Tianjin Ganglv Nonferrous Metal
Materials Co., Ltd.
150. Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp.,
Ltd.
151. Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat
Transmission Technology, Ltd.
152. Tianjin Xiandai Plastic & Aluminum
Products Co., Ltd.
153. Tiazhou Lifeng Manufacturing
Corporation
154. Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd.
155. Traffic Brick Network, LLC
156. Union Aluminum (SIP) Co.
157. Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd.
158. USA Worldwide Door Components
(PINGHU) Co., Ltd.
159. Wenzhou Shengbo Decoration &
Hardware
160. Whirlpool (Guangdong)
161. Whirlpool Canada L.P.
162. Whirlpool Microwave Products
Development Ltd.
163. WTI Building Products, Ltd.
164. Xin Wei Aluminum Co.
165. Xin Wei Aluminum Company Limited
166. Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel
Product Co., Ltd.
167. Yuyao Fanshun Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
168. Yuyao Haoshen Import & Export
169. Zahoqing China Square Industry
Limited
170. Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum Factory
Company Ltd.
171. Zhaoqing China Square Industrial Ltd.
172. Zhaoqing China Square Industry
Limited
173. Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co.,
Ltd.
174. Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co.,
Ltd.
175. Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminium
Industry Co., Ltd.
176. Zhejiang Zhengte Group Co., Ltd.
177. Zhenjiang Xinlong Group Co., Ltd.
178. Zhongshan Daya Hardware Co., Ltd.
179. Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminium
Factory Ltd.
180. Zhongya Shaped Aluminium (HK)
Holding Limited
181. Zhuhai Runxingtai Electrical Equipment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:52 Jun 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2017–11665 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–848]
Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening
Agents From Taiwan: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
stilbenic optical brightening agents
(OBAs) from Taiwan. The period of
review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through
April 30, 2016. The review covers one
producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise, Teh Fong Ming
International Co., Ltd. (TFM). We
preliminarily find that TFM has not sold
subject merchandise at less than normal
value. Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1757, and (202) 482–1690,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the
Order 1 is OBAs and is currently
classifiable under subheadings
3204.20.8000, 2933.69.6050,
2921.59.4000 and 2921.59.8090 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). While the
HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written product description remains
dispositive.2
1 See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents
from Taiwan: Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order, 77 FR 27419 (May 10, 2012) (Order).
2 A full description of the scope of the Order is
contained in the Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Stilbenic
Optical Brightening Agents from Taiwan: Decision
Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
2016,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted
by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Constructed export
price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act. In addition, the
Department has relied on partial adverse
facts available under sections 776(a) and
(b) of the Act. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see Preliminary Decision
Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
A list of the topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as an Appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that a
weighted-average dumping margin of
0.00 percent exists for TFM for the
period May 1, 2015, through April 30,
2016.
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this proceeding
within five days after public
announcement of the preliminary
results.3
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii),
interested parties may submit cases
briefs not later than 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the date for filing
case briefs.4 Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.5
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
3 See
19 CFR 351.224(b).
19 CFR 351.309(d).
5 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2) and 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
4 See
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26055-26060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11665]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-967]
Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission of Review in Part; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on aluminum
extrusions from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The period of
review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. These preliminary
results cover 191 companies and the PRC-wide entity for which an
administrative review was initiated. The PRC-wide entity did not
respond to the Department's initial quantity and value questionnaires
(Q&Vs), and therefore the Department is preliminarily applying adverse
facts available (AFA) to the PRC-wide entity. The Department selected
the following companies as mandatory respondents: Kam Kiu Aluminium
Products Sdn. Bhd. (Kam Kiu) and tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
(tenKsolar). The Department preliminarily determines that Kam Kiu did
not demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate and is, therefore, part
of the PRC-wide entity. The Department further preliminarily determines
that because we lack sufficient record information to allow the
Department to calculate a margin for tenKsolar's reported sales of
subject merchandise into the United States during the POR, the rate
applied to tenKsolar's merchandise upon entry continues to be the AD
rate applied to tenKsolar, except to adjust for countervailable duty
(CVD) subsidies determined under the parallel aluminum extrusions CVD
order. If these preliminary results are adopted in the final results of
this review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Scott or Mark Flessner, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
[[Page 26056]]
(202) 482-2657 or (202) 482-6312, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 7, 2016, the Department published the notice of initiation
of the administrative review of the AD order on aluminum extrusions
from the PRC \1\ for the period May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016,
covering 191 companies and the PRC-wide entity.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011) (the Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 44260 (July 7, 2016) (Initiation
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a complete description of the events that followed the
initiation of this administrative review, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.\3\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's AD and
CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in
the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of
topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as
Appendix I to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China; 2015-2016,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the Order is aluminum extrusions which
are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from
aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy
series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other
certifying body equivalents).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for a complete
description of the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS): 6603.90.8100, 7616.99.51, 8479.89.94, 8481.90.9060,
8481.90.9085, 9031.90.9195, 8424.90.9080, 9405.99.4020, 9031.90.90.95,
7616.10.90.90, 7609.00.00, 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30,
7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70,
7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94,
8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00,
7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60,
7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30,
8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10,
8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45,
8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15,
8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55,
8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50,
8306.30.00.00, 8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45, 8418.99.80.05,
8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40,
8473.30.20.00, 8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00,
8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00, 8515.90.20.00,
8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00, 8529.90.73.00,
8529.90.97.60, 8536.90.80.85, 8538.10.00.00, 8543.90.88.80,
8708.29.50.60, 8708.80.65.90, 8803.30.00.60, 9013.90.50.00,
9013.90.90.00, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50,
9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05,
9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10,
9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80,
9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10,
9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51,
9403.90.80.61, 9506.11.40.80, 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00,
9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20,
9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30,
9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00,
9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00,
9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50.
The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products
may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76
subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99, as well
as under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be
classifiable under HTSUS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60.
While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is
dispositive.
Extension of Deadlines for Preliminary Results
On January 3, 2017, the Department extended the period of time for
issuing the preliminary results of this review until May 11, 2017.\5\
On May 5, 2017, the Department again extended the period of time for
issuing the preliminary results of this review until May 31, 2017.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's
Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated January 3, 2017.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's
Republic of China: Additional Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated May 5,
2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of Administrative Review in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), based on the timely withdrawal of
the requests for review, we are partially rescinding this
administrative review with respect to 181 of the 191 companies named in
the Initiation Notice.\7\ See Appendix II for a list of these
companies.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44262-44265.
\8\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for further details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology
underlying our preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination Regarding tenKsolar's Reported Sales
Based on information submitted by tenKsolar, we preliminarily find
that we lack sufficient record information to allow the Department to
calculate a margin for tenKsolar's reported sales of subject
merchandise during the POR.\9\ Accordingly, we preliminarily determine
that the rate which should be applied to tenKsolar is the AD rate
applied to its merchandise upon entry. Consistent with our practice in
non-market economy (NME) cases, the Department is not rescinding this
review with respect to tenKsolar, but intends to complete the review of
tenKsolar and issue appropriate
[[Page 26057]]
instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 10-12.
\10\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
In the Initiation Notice, we informed parties of the opportunity to
request a separate rate.\11\ In proceedings involving NME countries,
the Department begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies
within the NME country are subject to government control and, thus,
should be assigned a single weighted-average dumping margin. It is the
Department's policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to
an administrative review involving an NME country this single rate
unless an exporter can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent
so as to be entitled to a separate rate. Companies that wanted to be
considered for a separate rate in this review were required to timely
file a separate rate application (SRA) or a separate rate certification
(SRC) to demonstrate their eligibility for a separate rate. SRAs and
SRCs were due to the Department within 30 calendar days of the
publication of the Initiation Notice.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44261-2.
\12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mandatory respondent Kam Kiu submitted a SRC,\13\ but did not
respond to any section of the Department's antidumping questionnaire;
instead, Kam Kiu withdrew from active participation as a mandatory
respondent.\14\ Accordingly, the Department cannot analyze or verify
the veracity of Kam Kiu's claims of being separate from the PRC-wide
entity for purposes of its export activities. As a result, we
preliminarily determine that Kam Kiu did not demonstrate its
eligibility for a separate rate in this review.\15\ Mandatory
respondent tenKsolar submitted a SRC,\16\ as well as timely responses
to each section of the Department's antidumping questionnaire to which
it was required to submit a response.\17\ Based on the information on
the record, we preliminarily determine that tenKsolar demonstrated its
eligibility for a separate rate in this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Kam Kiu Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China: Separate Rate Certification, dated
August 3, 2016.
\14\ See Kam Kiu Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China: Withdrawal as a Mandatory Respondent,
dated February 14, 2017.
\15\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44262 (``For exporters and
producers who submit a separate-rate status application or
certification and subsequently are selected as mandatory
respondents, these exporters and producers will no longer be
eligible for separate rate status unless they respond to all parts
of the questionnaire as mandatory respondents.'').
\16\ See tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China: Separate Rate Certification, dated
August 3, 2016.
\17\ See tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China: Section A Questionnaire Response, dated
February 23, 2017; see also tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions
from the People's Republic of China: Section C and D Questionnaire
Response, dated March 9, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department did not receive a SRA or SRC from any of the other
entities remaining under review. As a result, we preliminarily
determine that the following entities are not eligible for a separate
rate in this administrative review: (1) Atlas Integrated Manufacturing
Ltd.; (2) Classic & Contemporary Inc.; (3) Dongguan Golden Tiger
Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; (4) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co.,
Ltd.; (5) Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (6)
Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (7) Sincere
Profit Limited; and (8) Suzhou New Hongji Precision Part Co.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application of Adverse Facts Available
The Department preliminarily determines that the use of facts
otherwise available is warranted with respect to the PRC-wide entity,
in accordance with sections 776(a)(2)(A) and (C) of the Act. The
Department issued a Q&V questionnaire to the PRC-wide entity on
December 2, 2016; \19\ however, the PRC-wide entity did not respond to
the Department's Q&V questionnaire. As a result, we preliminarily find
that the PRC-wide entity withheld necessary information that was
requested by the Department, significantly impeding the proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Department Letter to Liu Fang, First Secretary, Embassy
of the People's Republic of China, dated December 2, 2016. See also
Memorandum, ``Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China: Issuance of Quantity and Value
Questionnaire to the PRC-wide Entity,'' dated December 8, 2016
(containing Federal Express shipment and delivery confirmation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, the Department
preliminarily determines that, because the PRC-wide entity failed to
cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with the
Department's requests for information, an adverse inference is
warranted.
PRC-Wide Entity
We preliminarily find that the following entities are part of the
PRC-wide entity in this administrative review because they failed to
submit a Q&V response, a SRA, a SRC, or (in the case of Kam Kiu) were
selected as a mandatory respondent and failed to respond to the AD
questionnaire: (1) Kam Kiu; (2) Atlas Integrated Manufacturing Ltd.;
(3) Classic & Contemporary Inc.; (4) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware
Industrial Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.;
(6) Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (7) Shenyang
Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (8) Sincere Profit
Limited; and (9) Suzhou New Hongji Precision Part Co.
The Department's change in policy regarding conditional review of
the PRC-wide entity applies to this administrative review.\20\ Under
this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a
party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review
of the entity. The petitioner \21\ requested a review of the PRC-wide
entity in the instant review; therefore, the PRC-wide entity is
currently under review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4,
2013).
\21\ The petitioner is the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade
Committee, composed of the following members: Aerolite Extrusion
Company; Alexandria Extrusion Company; William L. Bonnell Company,
Inc.; Frontier Aluminum Corporation; Futura Industries Corporation;
Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum Corporation;
Profile Extrusion Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.; and Western
Extrusions Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustments for Countervailable Subsidies
Because no mandatory respondent established eligibility for an
adjustment under section 777A(f) of the Act for countervailable
domestic subsidies, for these preliminary results, the Department did
not make an adjustment pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act for
countervailable domestic subsidies for the separate-rate recipients.
Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act, we made an adjustment
for countervailable export subsidies for tenKsolar. We calculated this
adjustment as the simple average of the countervailable export
subsidies determined for the mandatory respondents in the 2014 (i.e.,
most recently completed) CVD administrative review \22\ and deducted
this amount from the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to
tenKsolar. \23\ The
[[Page 26058]]
adjusted rate for tenKsolar is 85.96 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2014, 81 FR 92778 (December 20, 2016).
\23\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 12 and 17-18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act, we also made an
adjustment for countervailable export subsidies for the PRC-wide
entity. We adjusted the PRC-wide entity cash deposit rate by the lowest
countervailable export subsidy determined for the mandatory respondents
in the 2014 (i.e., most recently completed) CVD administrative
review.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the 2015-2016 POR:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margin
adjusted
Weighted- for
average liquidation
Exporter dumping and cash
margin deposit
(percent) purposes
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.................. 86.01 85.96
PRC-wide Entity................................ 86.01 85.96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, as explained above, the Department preliminarily
determines that the following companies are part of the PRC-wide
entity: (1) Kam Kiu; (2) Atlas Integrated Manufacturing Ltd.; (3)
Classic & Contemporary Inc.; (4) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware
Industrial Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.;
(6) Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (7) Shenyang
Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (8) Sincere Profit
Limited; and (9) Suzhou New Hongji Precision Part Co.
Disclosure and Public Comment
Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the
calculations performed in connection with its preliminary results
within five days of its public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because the
Department did not calculate weighted-average dumping margins for
either of the individually examined companies, Kam Kiu and tenKsolar,
in this review, nor for the PRC-wide entity, there are no calculations
to disclose.
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of these preliminary results of
review.\25\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the case briefs are
filed.\26\ Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with
the argument (a) a statement of the issue, (b) a brief summary of the
argument, and (c) a table of authorities.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\26\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\27\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of
publication of this notice.\28\ Hearing requests should contain the
following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to
be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made,
parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be
held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\29\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed
electronically using ACCESS.\30\ An electronically filed document must
be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic
records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due date.
Documents excepted from the electronic submission requirements must be
filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in Room
18022 and stamped with the date and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the
due date.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
\31\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative review, which will include the
results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within
120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal
Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of this review, the Department
will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review.\32\ The Department intends
to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of
the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries containing subject
merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate.
Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter under
review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended
entries that entered under that exporter's case number will be
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). We will instruct CBP accordingly.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements for estimated antidumping
duties, when imposed, will apply to all shipments of subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act:
(1) If the companies preliminarily determined to be eligible for a
separate rate receive a separate rate in the final results of this
administrative review, their cash deposit rate will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of
this review, as adjusted for domestic and export subsidies (except, if
that rate is de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2)
for any previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
that are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but that
received a separate rate in the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have
not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
will be that for the PRC-wide entity; (4) for the PRC-wide entity, the
cash deposit rate will be 85.96 percent; \34\ and (5) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ This rate is adjusted for export subsidies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
[[Page 26059]]
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing notice of these preliminary results
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: May 31, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum:
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Respondent Selection
V. Rescission of Administrative Review in Part
VI. Preliminary Determination Regarding tenKsolar's Reported Sales
VII. NME Country
VIII. Separate Rates
IX. PRC-Wide Entity
X. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference
XI. The PRC-Wide Entity
XII. Adjustments for Countervailable Subsidies
XIII. Conclusion
Appendix II
Companies for Which This Administrative Review Is Being Rescinded
1. Acro Import and Export Co.
2. Activa International Inc.
3. Allied Maker Limited
4. Alnan Aluminium Co., Ltd.
5. Aluminicaste Fundicion de Mexico
6. AMC Ltd.
7. Belton (Asia) Development Ltd.
8. Birchwoods (Lin'an) Leisure Products Co., Ltd.
9. Bolnar Hong Kong Ltd.
10. Bracalente Metal Products (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
11. Changshu Changshen Aluminium Products Co., Ltd.
12. Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd.
13. Changzhou Tenglong Auto Parts Co., Ltd.
14. China Square
15. China Square Industrial Co.
16. China Zhongwang Holdings, Ltd.
17. Chiping One Stop Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd.
18. Clear Sky Inc.
19. Cosco (J.M.) Aluminium Co., Ltd.
20. Dalian Huacheng Aquatic Products
21. Dalian Liwang Trade Co., Ltd.
22. Danfoss Micro Channel Heat Exchanger (Jia Xing) Co., Ltd.
23. Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd.
24. Dongguan Dazhan Metal Co., Ltd.
25. Dragonluxe Limited
26. Dynabright Int'l Group (HK) Limited
27. Dynamic Technologies China Ltd.
28. Ever Extend Ent. Ltd.
29. Fenghua Metal Product Factory
30. First Union Property Limited
31. FookShing Metal & Plastic Co. Ltd.
32. Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou New & High-Tech Industrial
Development Zone
33. Foshan City Nanhai Hongjia Aluminum Alloy Co., Ltd.
34. Foshan Golden Source Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.
35. Foshan Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd.
36. Foshan Jinlan Aluminum Co. Ltd.
37. Foshan JMA Aluminum Company Limited
38. Foshan Sanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co., Ltd.
39. Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.
40. Foshan Yong Li Jian Aluminum Co., Ltd.
41. Fujian Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
42. Fuzhou Sunmodo New Energy Equipment
43. Genimex Shanghai, Ltd.
44. Global PMX Dongguan Co., Ltd.
45. Global Point Technology (Far East) Limited
46. Gold Mountain International Development Limited
47. Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc.
48. Gran Cabrio Capital Pte. Ltd.
49. Gree Electric Appliances
50. GT Capital Pte. Ltd.
51. Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd.
52. Guang Ya Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd.
53. Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd.
54. Guangdong Jianmei Aluminum Profile Company Limited
55. Guangdong JMA Aluminum Profile Factory (Group) Co., Ltd.
56. Guangdong Nanhai Foodstuffs Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
57. Guangdong Weiye Aluminum Factory Co., Ltd.
58. Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.
59. Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd.
60. Guangdong Xin Wei Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.
61. Guangdong Yonglijian Aluminum Co., Ltd.
62. Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited
63. Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd.
64. Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware Products Co., Ltd.
65. Hangzhou Xingyi Metal Products Co., Ltd.
66. Hanwood Enterprises Limited
67. Hanyung Alcoba Co., Ltd.
68. Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd.
69. Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
70. Hao Mei Aluminum Co., Ltd.
71. Hao Mei Aluminum International Co., Ltd.
72. Hebei Xusen Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd.
73. Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.
74. Hong Kong Gree Electric Appliances Sales Limited
75. Hong Kong Modern Non-Ferrous Metal
76. Honsense Development Company
77. Hui Mei Gao Aluminum Foshan Co., Ltd.
78. IDEX Dinglee Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
79. IDEX Technology Suzhou Co., Ltd.
80. IDEX Health
81. Innovative Aluminium (Hong Kong) Limited
82. iSource Asia
83. Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.
84. Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.
85. Jiangmen Jianghai District Foreign Economic Enterprise Corp.
Ltd.
86. Jiangmen Jianghai Foreign Ent. Gen.
87. Jiangmen Qunxing Hardware Diecasting Co., Ltd.
88. Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd.
89. Jiangyin Suncitygaylin
90. Jiangyin Trust International Inc.
91. Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows Co., Ltd.
92. Jiaxing Taixin Metal Products Co., Ltd.
93. Jiuyan Co., Ltd.
94. JMA (HK) Company Limited
95. Justhere Co., Ltd.
96. Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co., Ltd.
97. Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd.
98. Kong Ah International Company Limited
99. Kromet International, Inc.
100. Kunshan Giant Light Metal Technology Co., Ltd.
101. Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd.
102. Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd.
103. Longkou Donghai Trade Co., Ltd.
104. Metaltek Group Co., Ltd.
105. Metaltek Metal Industry Co., Ltd.
106. Midea Air Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd.
107. Midea International Trading Co., Ltd.
108. Midea International Training Co., Ltd.
109. Miland Luck Limited
110. Nanhai Textiles Import & Export Co., Ltd.
111. New Asia Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.
112. New Zhongya Aluminum Factory
113. Nidec Sankyo (Zhejang) Corporation
114. Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd.
115. Ningbo Coaster International Co., Ltd.
116. Ningbo Hi Tech Reliable Manufacturing Company
117. Ningbo Ivy Daily Commodity Co., Ltd.
118. Ningbo Yili Import and Export Co., Ltd.
119. North China Aluminum Co., Ltd.
120. North Fenghua Aluminum Ltd.
121. Northern States Metals
122. PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited
123. Pengcheng Aluminum Enterprise Inc.
124. Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited
125. Permasteelisa South China Factory
126. Pingguo Aluminum Company Limited
127. Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd.
128. Popular Plastics Co., Ltd.
129. Press Metal International Ltd.
130. Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd.
131. Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
132. Shangdong Huasheng Pesticide Machinery Co.
[[Page 26060]]
133. Shangdong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
134. Shanghai Automobile Air Conditioner Accessories Ltd.
135. Shanghai Canghai Aluminum Tube Packaging Co., Ltd.
136. Shanghai Dongsheng Metal
137. Shanghai Shen Hang Imp & Exp Co., Ltd.
138. Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
139. Shenzhen Hudson Technology Development Co.
140. Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd.
141. Sihui Shi Guo Yao Aluminum Co., Ltd.
142. Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
143. Southwest Aluminum (Group) Co., Ltd.
144. Suzhou JRP Import & Export Co., Ltd.
145. Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd.
146. Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
147. Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation, Ltd.
148. Taizhou United Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
149. Tianjin Ganglv Nonferrous Metal Materials Co., Ltd.
150. Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd.
151. Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat Transmission Technology, Ltd.
152. Tianjin Xiandai Plastic & Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.
153. Tiazhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation
154. Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd.
155. Traffic Brick Network, LLC
156. Union Aluminum (SIP) Co.
157. Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd.
158. USA Worldwide Door Components (PINGHU) Co., Ltd.
159. Wenzhou Shengbo Decoration & Hardware
160. Whirlpool (Guangdong)
161. Whirlpool Canada L.P.
162. Whirlpool Microwave Products Development Ltd.
163. WTI Building Products, Ltd.
164. Xin Wei Aluminum Co.
165. Xin Wei Aluminum Company Limited
166. Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.
167. Yuyao Fanshun Import & Export Co., Ltd.
168. Yuyao Haoshen Import & Export
169. Zahoqing China Square Industry Limited
170. Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum Factory Company Ltd.
171. Zhaoqing China Square Industrial Ltd.
172. Zhaoqing China Square Industry Limited
173. Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd.
174. Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co., Ltd.
175. Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd.
176. Zhejiang Zhengte Group Co., Ltd.
177. Zhenjiang Xinlong Group Co., Ltd.
178. Zhongshan Daya Hardware Co., Ltd.
179. Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminium Factory Ltd.
180. Zhongya Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited
181. Zhuhai Runxingtai Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2017-11665 Filed 6-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P