Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review in Part; 2015-2016, 26055-26060 [2017-11665]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES If either Borusan’s or Toscelik’s weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either a respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the methodology described in the ‘‘Rate for Non-Examined Companies’’ section, above. With respect to Erbosan, Borusan Birlesik, Borusan Gemlik, Borusan Ihracat, Borusan Ithicat, and Tubeco, if we continue to find that these companies had no shipments of subject merchandise in the final results, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by these companies, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.18 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Toscelik will be zero, unless there is change in Toscelik’s dumping margin in the final results of this review; (2) the cash deposit rate for Borusan will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (3) for other manufacturers and exporters covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which that manufacturer 18 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:52 Jun 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 or exporter participated; (4) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (5) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 14.74 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.19 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(1)(b)(4). Dated: May 31, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 5. Rates for Non-Examined Companies 6. Comparisons to Normal Value 7. Product Comparisons 8. Date of Sale 9. Export Price 10. Normal Value 11. Currency Conversion 12. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017–11666 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 19 See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26055 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–967] Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review in Part; 2015– 2016 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on aluminum extrusions from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. These preliminary results cover 191 companies and the PRC-wide entity for which an administrative review was initiated. The PRC-wide entity did not respond to the Department’s initial quantity and value questionnaires (Q&Vs), and therefore the Department is preliminarily applying adverse facts available (AFA) to the PRC-wide entity. The Department selected the following companies as mandatory respondents: Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn. Bhd. (Kam Kiu) and tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (tenKsolar). The Department preliminarily determines that Kam Kiu did not demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate and is, therefore, part of the PRC-wide entity. The Department further preliminarily determines that because we lack sufficient record information to allow the Department to calculate a margin for tenKsolar’s reported sales of subject merchandise into the United States during the POR, the rate applied to tenKsolar’s merchandise upon entry continues to be the AD rate applied to tenKsolar, except to adjust for countervailable duty (CVD) subsidies determined under the parallel aluminum extrusions CVD order. If these preliminary results are adopted in the final results of this review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective June 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Scott or Mark Flessner, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1 26056 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices (202) 482–2657 or (202) 482–6312, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 7, 2016, the Department published the notice of initiation of the administrative review of the AD order on aluminum extrusions from the PRC 1 for the period May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016, covering 191 companies and the PRC-wide entity.2 For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this administrative review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3 The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix I to this notice. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is aluminum extrusions which are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other certifying body equivalents).4 Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 6603.90.8100, 7616.99.51, 8479.89.94, 8481.90.9060, 8481.90.9085, 9031.90.9195, 8424.90.9080, mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES 1 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011) (the Order). 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 44260 (July 7, 2016) (Initiation Notice). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China; 2015–2016,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 4 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for a complete description of the scope of the Order. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:52 Jun 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 9405.99.4020, 9031.90.90.95, 7616.10.90.90, 7609.00.00, 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00, 8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45, 8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 8473.30.20.00, 8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00, 8515.90.20.00, 8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00, 8529.90.73.00, 8529.90.97.60, 8536.90.80.85, 8538.10.00.00, 8543.90.88.80, 8708.29.50.60, 8708.80.65.90, 8803.30.00.60, 9013.90.50.00, 9013.90.90.00, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61, 9506.11.40.80, 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50. The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76 subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99, as well as under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be classifiable under HTSUS PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is dispositive. Extension of Deadlines for Preliminary Results On January 3, 2017, the Department extended the period of time for issuing the preliminary results of this review until May 11, 2017.5 On May 5, 2017, the Department again extended the period of time for issuing the preliminary results of this review until May 31, 2017.6 Rescission of Administrative Review in Part Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), based on the timely withdrawal of the requests for review, we are partially rescinding this administrative review with respect to 181 of the 191 companies named in the Initiation Notice.7 See Appendix II for a list of these companies.8 Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Determination Regarding tenKsolar’s Reported Sales Based on information submitted by tenKsolar, we preliminarily find that we lack sufficient record information to allow the Department to calculate a margin for tenKsolar’s reported sales of subject merchandise during the POR.9 Accordingly, we preliminarily determine that the rate which should be applied to tenKsolar is the AD rate applied to its merchandise upon entry. Consistent with our practice in nonmarket economy (NME) cases, the Department is not rescinding this review with respect to tenKsolar, but intends to complete the review of tenKsolar and issue appropriate 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated January 3, 2017. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Additional Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated May 5, 2017. 7 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44262–44265. 8 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for further details. 9 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 10– 12. E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review.10 Separate Rates mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES In the Initiation Notice, we informed parties of the opportunity to request a separate rate.11 In proceedings involving NME countries, the Department begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies within the NME country are subject to government control and, thus, should be assigned a single weightedaverage dumping margin. It is the Department’s policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to an administrative review involving an NME country this single rate unless an exporter can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent so as to be entitled to a separate rate. Companies that wanted to be considered for a separate rate in this review were required to timely file a separate rate application (SRA) or a separate rate certification (SRC) to demonstrate their eligibility for a separate rate. SRAs and SRCs were due to the Department within 30 calendar days of the publication of the Initiation Notice.12 Mandatory respondent Kam Kiu submitted a SRC,13 but did not respond to any section of the Department’s antidumping questionnaire; instead, Kam Kiu withdrew from active participation as a mandatory respondent.14 Accordingly, the Department cannot analyze or verify the veracity of Kam Kiu’s claims of being separate from the PRC-wide entity for purposes of its export activities. As a result, we preliminarily determine that Kam Kiu did not demonstrate its eligibility for a separate rate in this review.15 Mandatory respondent tenKsolar submitted a SRC,16 as well as timely responses to each section of the Department’s antidumping questionnaire to which it was required 10 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011). 11 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44261–2. 12 Id. 13 See Kam Kiu Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Separate Rate Certification, dated August 3, 2016. 14 See Kam Kiu Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal as a Mandatory Respondent, dated February 14, 2017. 15 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44262 (‘‘For exporters and producers who submit a separate-rate status application or certification and subsequently are selected as mandatory respondents, these exporters and producers will no longer be eligible for separate rate status unless they respond to all parts of the questionnaire as mandatory respondents.’’). 16 See tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Separate Rate Certification, dated August 3, 2016. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:52 Jun 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 to submit a response.17 Based on the information on the record, we preliminarily determine that tenKsolar demonstrated its eligibility for a separate rate in this review. The Department did not receive a SRA or SRC from any of the other entities remaining under review. As a result, we preliminarily determine that the following entities are not eligible for a separate rate in this administrative review: (1) Atlas Integrated Manufacturing Ltd.; (2) Classic & Contemporary Inc.; (3) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; (4) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.; (5) Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (6) Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (7) Sincere Profit Limited; and (8) Suzhou New Hongji Precision Part Co.18 Application of Adverse Facts Available The Department preliminarily determines that the use of facts otherwise available is warranted with respect to the PRC-wide entity, in accordance with sections 776(a)(2)(A) and (C) of the Act. The Department issued a Q&V questionnaire to the PRCwide entity on December 2, 2016; 19 however, the PRC-wide entity did not respond to the Department’s Q&V questionnaire. As a result, we preliminarily find that the PRC-wide entity withheld necessary information that was requested by the Department, significantly impeding the proceeding. Further, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, the Department preliminarily determines that, because the PRC-wide entity failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with the Department’s requests for information, an adverse inference is warranted. PRC-Wide Entity We preliminarily find that the following entities are part of the PRCwide entity in this administrative review because they failed to submit a Q&V response, a SRA, a SRC, or (in the case of Kam Kiu) were selected as a 17 See tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Section A Questionnaire Response, dated February 23, 2017; see also tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Section C and D Questionnaire Response, dated March 9, 2017. 18 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 14. 19 See Department Letter to Liu Fang, First Secretary, Embassy of the People’s Republic of China, dated December 2, 2016. See also Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Issuance of Quantity and Value Questionnaire to the PRC-wide Entity,’’ dated December 8, 2016 (containing Federal Express shipment and delivery confirmation). PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26057 mandatory respondent and failed to respond to the AD questionnaire: (1) Kam Kiu; (2) Atlas Integrated Manufacturing Ltd.; (3) Classic & Contemporary Inc.; (4) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.; (6) Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (7) Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (8) Sincere Profit Limited; and (9) Suzhou New Hongji Precision Part Co. The Department’s change in policy regarding conditional review of the PRC-wide entity applies to this administrative review.20 Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department selfinitiates, a review of the entity. The petitioner 21 requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in the instant review; therefore, the PRC-wide entity is currently under review. Adjustments for Countervailable Subsidies Because no mandatory respondent established eligibility for an adjustment under section 777A(f) of the Act for countervailable domestic subsidies, for these preliminary results, the Department did not make an adjustment pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act for countervailable domestic subsidies for the separate-rate recipients. Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act, we made an adjustment for countervailable export subsidies for tenKsolar. We calculated this adjustment as the simple average of the countervailable export subsidies determined for the mandatory respondents in the 2014 (i.e., most recently completed) CVD administrative review 22 and deducted this amount from the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to tenKsolar. 23 The 20 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). 21 The petitioner is the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee, composed of the following members: Aerolite Extrusion Company; Alexandria Extrusion Company; William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.; Frontier Aluminum Corporation; Futura Industries Corporation; Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum Corporation; Profile Extrusion Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.; and Western Extrusions Corporation. 22 Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2014, 81 FR 92778 (December 20, 2016). 23 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 12 and 17–18. E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1 26058 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices adjusted rate for tenKsolar is 85.96 percent. Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act, we also made an adjustment for countervailable export subsidies for the PRC-wide entity. We adjusted the PRCwide entity cash deposit rate by the lowest countervailable export subsidy determined for the mandatory respondents in the 2014 (i.e., most recently completed) CVD administrative review.24 Preliminary Results of Review The Department preliminarily determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 2015–2016 POR: Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Exporter tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. ... PRC-wide Entity Margin adjusted for liquidation and cash deposit purposes (percent) 86.01 86.01 85.96 85.96 mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Additionally, as explained above, the Department preliminarily determines that the following companies are part of the PRC-wide entity: (1) Kam Kiu; (2) Atlas Integrated Manufacturing Ltd.; (3) Classic & Contemporary Inc.; (4) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.; (6) Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (7) Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (8) Sincere Profit Limited; and (9) Suzhou New Hongji Precision Part Co. Disclosure and Public Comment Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with its preliminary results within five days of its public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because the Department did not calculate weightedaverage dumping margins for either of the individually examined companies, Kam Kiu and tenKsolar, in this review, nor for the PRC-wide entity, there are no calculations to disclose. Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.25 Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five 24 See 25 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:52 Jun 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 days after the case briefs are filed.26 Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with the argument (a) a statement of the issue, (b) a brief summary of the argument, and (c) a table of authorities.27 Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice.28 Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.29 All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed electronically using ACCESS.30 An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department’s electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due date. Documents excepted from the electronic submission requirements must be filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and stamped with the date and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due date.31 Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results of this review, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.32 The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries containing subject merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the 26 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 28 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 29 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 30 See generally 19 CFR 351.303. 31 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). 32 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 27 See PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter’s case number will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.33 For the companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). We will instruct CBP accordingly. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements for estimated antidumping duties, when imposed, will apply to all shipments of subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) If the companies preliminarily determined to be eligible for a separate rate receive a separate rate in the final results of this administrative review, their cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review, as adjusted for domestic and export subsidies (except, if that rate is de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for any previously investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters that are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but that received a separate rate in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRCwide entity; (4) for the PRC-wide entity, the cash deposit rate will be 85.96 percent; 34 and (5) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 33 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 34 This rate is adjusted for export subsidies. E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing notice of these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: May 31, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Respondent Selection V. Rescission of Administrative Review in Part VI. Preliminary Determination Regarding tenKsolar’s Reported Sales VII. NME Country VIII. Separate Rates IX. PRC-Wide Entity X. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference XI. The PRC-Wide Entity XII. Adjustments for Countervailable Subsidies XIII. Conclusion mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Appendix II Companies for Which This Administrative Review Is Being Rescinded 1. Acro Import and Export Co. 2. Activa International Inc. 3. Allied Maker Limited 4. Alnan Aluminium Co., Ltd. 5. Aluminicaste Fundicion de Mexico 6. AMC Ltd. 7. Belton (Asia) Development Ltd. 8. Birchwoods (Lin’an) Leisure Products Co., Ltd. 9. Bolnar Hong Kong Ltd. 10. Bracalente Metal Products (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 11. Changshu Changshen Aluminium Products Co., Ltd. 12. Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd. 13. Changzhou Tenglong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. 14. China Square 15. China Square Industrial Co. 16. China Zhongwang Holdings, Ltd. 17. Chiping One Stop Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd. 18. Clear Sky Inc. 19. Cosco (J.M.) Aluminium Co., Ltd. 20. Dalian Huacheng Aquatic Products VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:52 Jun 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 21. Dalian Liwang Trade Co., Ltd. 22. Danfoss Micro Channel Heat Exchanger (Jia Xing) Co., Ltd. 23. Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd. 24. Dongguan Dazhan Metal Co., Ltd. 25. Dragonluxe Limited 26. Dynabright Int’l Group (HK) Limited 27. Dynamic Technologies China Ltd. 28. Ever Extend Ent. Ltd. 29. Fenghua Metal Product Factory 30. First Union Property Limited 31. FookShing Metal & Plastic Co. Ltd. 32. Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou New & HighTech Industrial Development Zone 33. Foshan City Nanhai Hongjia Aluminum Alloy Co., Ltd. 34. Foshan Golden Source Aluminum Products Co., Ltd. 35. Foshan Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd. 36. Foshan Jinlan Aluminum Co. Ltd. 37. Foshan JMA Aluminum Company Limited 38. Foshan Sanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co., Ltd. 39. Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. 40. Foshan Yong Li Jian Aluminum Co., Ltd. 41. Fujian Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd. 42. Fuzhou Sunmodo New Energy Equipment 43. Genimex Shanghai, Ltd. 44. Global PMX Dongguan Co., Ltd. 45. Global Point Technology (Far East) Limited 46. Gold Mountain International Development Limited 47. Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc. 48. Gran Cabrio Capital Pte. Ltd. 49. Gree Electric Appliances 50. GT Capital Pte. Ltd. 51. Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd. 52. Guang Ya Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd. 53. Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd. 54. Guangdong Jianmei Aluminum Profile Company Limited 55. Guangdong JMA Aluminum Profile Factory (Group) Co., Ltd. 56. Guangdong Nanhai Foodstuffs Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. 57. Guangdong Weiye Aluminum Factory Co., Ltd. 58. Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. 59. Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd. 60. Guangdong Xin Wei Aluminum Products Co., Ltd. 61. Guangdong Yonglijian Aluminum Co., Ltd. 62. Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited 63. Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. 64. Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware Products Co., Ltd. 65. Hangzhou Xingyi Metal Products Co., Ltd. 66. Hanwood Enterprises Limited 67. Hanyung Alcoba Co., Ltd. 68. Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd. 69. Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 70. Hao Mei Aluminum Co., Ltd. 71. Hao Mei Aluminum International Co., Ltd. 72. Hebei Xusen Wire Mesh Products Co., PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26059 Ltd. 73. Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. 74. Hong Kong Gree Electric Appliances Sales Limited 75. Hong Kong Modern Non-Ferrous Metal 76. Honsense Development Company 77. Hui Mei Gao Aluminum Foshan Co., Ltd. 78. IDEX Dinglee Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. 79. IDEX Technology Suzhou Co., Ltd. 80. IDEX Health 81. Innovative Aluminium (Hong Kong) Limited 82. iSource Asia 83. Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd. 84. Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd. 85. Jiangmen Jianghai District Foreign Economic Enterprise Corp. Ltd. 86. Jiangmen Jianghai Foreign Ent. Gen. 87. Jiangmen Qunxing Hardware Diecasting Co., Ltd. 88. Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd. 89. Jiangyin Suncitygaylin 90. Jiangyin Trust International Inc. 91. Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows Co., Ltd. 92. Jiaxing Taixin Metal Products Co., Ltd. 93. Jiuyan Co., Ltd. 94. JMA (HK) Company Limited 95. Justhere Co., Ltd. 96. Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co., Ltd. 97. Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd. 98. Kong Ah International Company Limited 99. Kromet International, Inc. 100. Kunshan Giant Light Metal Technology Co., Ltd. 101. Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd. 102. Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd. 103. Longkou Donghai Trade Co., Ltd. 104. Metaltek Group Co., Ltd. 105. Metaltek Metal Industry Co., Ltd. 106. Midea Air Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd. 107. Midea International Trading Co., Ltd. 108. Midea International Training Co., Ltd. 109. Miland Luck Limited 110. Nanhai Textiles Import & Export Co., Ltd. 111. New Asia Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd. 112. New Zhongya Aluminum Factory 113. Nidec Sankyo (Zhejang) Corporation 114. Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd. 115. Ningbo Coaster International Co., Ltd. 116. Ningbo Hi Tech Reliable Manufacturing Company 117. Ningbo Ivy Daily Commodity Co., Ltd. 118. Ningbo Yili Import and Export Co., Ltd. 119. North China Aluminum Co., Ltd. 120. North Fenghua Aluminum Ltd. 121. Northern States Metals 122. PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited 123. Pengcheng Aluminum Enterprise Inc. 124. Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited 125. Permasteelisa South China Factory 126. Pingguo Aluminum Company Limited 127. Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd. 128. Popular Plastics Co., Ltd. 129. Press Metal International Ltd. 130. Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd. 131. Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd. 132. Shangdong Huasheng Pesticide Machinery Co. E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1 mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES 26060 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices 133. Shangdong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd. 134. Shanghai Automobile Air Conditioner Accessories Ltd. 135. Shanghai Canghai Aluminum Tube Packaging Co., Ltd. 136. Shanghai Dongsheng Metal 137. Shanghai Shen Hang Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. 138. Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 139. Shenzhen Hudson Technology Development Co. 140. Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd. 141. Sihui Shi Guo Yao Aluminum Co., Ltd. 142. Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 143. Southwest Aluminum (Group) Co., Ltd. 144. Suzhou JRP Import & Export Co., Ltd. 145. Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd. 146. Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 147. Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation, Ltd. 148. Taizhou United Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. 149. Tianjin Ganglv Nonferrous Metal Materials Co., Ltd. 150. Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd. 151. Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat Transmission Technology, Ltd. 152. Tianjin Xiandai Plastic & Aluminum Products Co., Ltd. 153. Tiazhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation 154. Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd. 155. Traffic Brick Network, LLC 156. Union Aluminum (SIP) Co. 157. Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd. 158. USA Worldwide Door Components (PINGHU) Co., Ltd. 159. Wenzhou Shengbo Decoration & Hardware 160. Whirlpool (Guangdong) 161. Whirlpool Canada L.P. 162. Whirlpool Microwave Products Development Ltd. 163. WTI Building Products, Ltd. 164. Xin Wei Aluminum Co. 165. Xin Wei Aluminum Company Limited 166. Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd. 167. Yuyao Fanshun Import & Export Co., Ltd. 168. Yuyao Haoshen Import & Export 169. Zahoqing China Square Industry Limited 170. Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum Factory Company Ltd. 171. Zhaoqing China Square Industrial Ltd. 172. Zhaoqing China Square Industry Limited 173. Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd. 174. Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co., Ltd. 175. Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd. 176. Zhejiang Zhengte Group Co., Ltd. 177. Zhenjiang Xinlong Group Co., Ltd. 178. Zhongshan Daya Hardware Co., Ltd. 179. Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminium Factory Ltd. 180. Zhongya Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited 181. Zhuhai Runxingtai Electrical Equipment VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:52 Jun 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 Co., Ltd. [FR Doc. 2017–11665 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–583–848] Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–2016 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain stilbenic optical brightening agents (OBAs) from Taiwan. The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, Teh Fong Ming International Co., Ltd. (TFM). We preliminarily find that TFM has not sold subject merchandise at less than normal value. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective June 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1757, and (202) 482–1690, respectively. AGENCY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the Order 1 is OBAs and is currently classifiable under subheadings 3204.20.8000, 2933.69.6050, 2921.59.4000 and 2921.59.8090 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). While the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive.2 1 See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents from Taiwan: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 27419 (May 10, 2012) (Order). 2 A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents from Taiwan: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015– 2016,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. In addition, the Department has relied on partial adverse facts available under sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for TFM for the period May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days after public announcement of the preliminary results.3 Public Comment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii), interested parties may submit cases briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.4 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.5 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a 3 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 19 CFR 351.309(d). 5 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2) and 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). 4 See E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26055-26060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-967]


Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Rescission of Review in Part; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on aluminum 
extrusions from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The period of 
review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. These preliminary 
results cover 191 companies and the PRC-wide entity for which an 
administrative review was initiated. The PRC-wide entity did not 
respond to the Department's initial quantity and value questionnaires 
(Q&Vs), and therefore the Department is preliminarily applying adverse 
facts available (AFA) to the PRC-wide entity. The Department selected 
the following companies as mandatory respondents: Kam Kiu Aluminium 
Products Sdn. Bhd. (Kam Kiu) and tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 
(tenKsolar). The Department preliminarily determines that Kam Kiu did 
not demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate and is, therefore, part 
of the PRC-wide entity. The Department further preliminarily determines 
that because we lack sufficient record information to allow the 
Department to calculate a margin for tenKsolar's reported sales of 
subject merchandise into the United States during the POR, the rate 
applied to tenKsolar's merchandise upon entry continues to be the AD 
rate applied to tenKsolar, except to adjust for countervailable duty 
(CVD) subsidies determined under the parallel aluminum extrusions CVD 
order. If these preliminary results are adopted in the final results of 
this review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Interested 
parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Scott or Mark Flessner, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone:

[[Page 26056]]

(202) 482-2657 or (202) 482-6312, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 7, 2016, the Department published the notice of initiation 
of the administrative review of the AD order on aluminum extrusions 
from the PRC \1\ for the period May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016, 
covering 191 companies and the PRC-wide entity.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011) (the Order).
    \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 44260 (July 7, 2016) (Initiation 
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete description of the events that followed the 
initiation of this administrative review, see the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.\3\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document 
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's AD and 
CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available 
to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in 
the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of 
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of 
topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as 
Appendix I to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum 
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China; 2015-2016,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the Order is aluminum extrusions which 
are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from 
aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy 
series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing 
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other 
certifying body equivalents).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for a complete 
description of the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the 
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS): 6603.90.8100, 7616.99.51, 8479.89.94, 8481.90.9060, 
8481.90.9085, 9031.90.9195, 8424.90.9080, 9405.99.4020, 9031.90.90.95, 
7616.10.90.90, 7609.00.00, 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 
7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 
7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 
8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 
7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 
7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 
8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 
8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 
8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 
8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 
8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 
8306.30.00.00, 8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45, 8418.99.80.05, 
8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 
8473.30.20.00, 8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 
8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00, 8515.90.20.00, 
8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00, 8529.90.73.00, 
8529.90.97.60, 8536.90.80.85, 8538.10.00.00, 8543.90.88.80, 
8708.29.50.60, 8708.80.65.90, 8803.30.00.60, 9013.90.50.00, 
9013.90.90.00, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 
9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 
9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 
9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, 
9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, 
9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 
9403.90.80.61, 9506.11.40.80, 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 
9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 
9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 
9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 
9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 
9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50.
    The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products 
may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76 
subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99, as well 
as under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be 
classifiable under HTSUS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60. 
While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is 
dispositive.

Extension of Deadlines for Preliminary Results

    On January 3, 2017, the Department extended the period of time for 
issuing the preliminary results of this review until May 11, 2017.\5\ 
On May 5, 2017, the Department again extended the period of time for 
issuing the preliminary results of this review until May 31, 2017.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's 
Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated January 3, 2017.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's 
Republic of China: Additional Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated May 5, 
2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rescission of Administrative Review in Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), based on the timely withdrawal of 
the requests for review, we are partially rescinding this 
administrative review with respect to 181 of the 191 companies named in 
the Initiation Notice.\7\ See Appendix II for a list of these 
companies.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44262-44265.
    \8\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for further details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology 
underlying our preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.

Preliminary Determination Regarding tenKsolar's Reported Sales

    Based on information submitted by tenKsolar, we preliminarily find 
that we lack sufficient record information to allow the Department to 
calculate a margin for tenKsolar's reported sales of subject 
merchandise during the POR.\9\ Accordingly, we preliminarily determine 
that the rate which should be applied to tenKsolar is the AD rate 
applied to its merchandise upon entry. Consistent with our practice in 
non-market economy (NME) cases, the Department is not rescinding this 
review with respect to tenKsolar, but intends to complete the review of 
tenKsolar and issue appropriate

[[Page 26057]]

instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 10-12.
    \10\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rates

    In the Initiation Notice, we informed parties of the opportunity to 
request a separate rate.\11\ In proceedings involving NME countries, 
the Department begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies 
within the NME country are subject to government control and, thus, 
should be assigned a single weighted-average dumping margin. It is the 
Department's policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to 
an administrative review involving an NME country this single rate 
unless an exporter can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent 
so as to be entitled to a separate rate. Companies that wanted to be 
considered for a separate rate in this review were required to timely 
file a separate rate application (SRA) or a separate rate certification 
(SRC) to demonstrate their eligibility for a separate rate. SRAs and 
SRCs were due to the Department within 30 calendar days of the 
publication of the Initiation Notice.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44261-2.
    \12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Mandatory respondent Kam Kiu submitted a SRC,\13\ but did not 
respond to any section of the Department's antidumping questionnaire; 
instead, Kam Kiu withdrew from active participation as a mandatory 
respondent.\14\ Accordingly, the Department cannot analyze or verify 
the veracity of Kam Kiu's claims of being separate from the PRC-wide 
entity for purposes of its export activities. As a result, we 
preliminarily determine that Kam Kiu did not demonstrate its 
eligibility for a separate rate in this review.\15\ Mandatory 
respondent tenKsolar submitted a SRC,\16\ as well as timely responses 
to each section of the Department's antidumping questionnaire to which 
it was required to submit a response.\17\ Based on the information on 
the record, we preliminarily determine that tenKsolar demonstrated its 
eligibility for a separate rate in this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Kam Kiu Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China: Separate Rate Certification, dated 
August 3, 2016.
    \14\ See Kam Kiu Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China: Withdrawal as a Mandatory Respondent, 
dated February 14, 2017.
    \15\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44262 (``For exporters and 
producers who submit a separate-rate status application or 
certification and subsequently are selected as mandatory 
respondents, these exporters and producers will no longer be 
eligible for separate rate status unless they respond to all parts 
of the questionnaire as mandatory respondents.'').
    \16\ See tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China: Separate Rate Certification, dated 
August 3, 2016.
    \17\ See tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China: Section A Questionnaire Response, dated 
February 23, 2017; see also tenKsolar Letter re: Aluminum Extrusions 
from the People's Republic of China: Section C and D Questionnaire 
Response, dated March 9, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department did not receive a SRA or SRC from any of the other 
entities remaining under review. As a result, we preliminarily 
determine that the following entities are not eligible for a separate 
rate in this administrative review: (1) Atlas Integrated Manufacturing 
Ltd.; (2) Classic & Contemporary Inc.; (3) Dongguan Golden Tiger 
Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; (4) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., 
Ltd.; (5) Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (6) 
Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (7) Sincere 
Profit Limited; and (8) Suzhou New Hongji Precision Part Co.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application of Adverse Facts Available

    The Department preliminarily determines that the use of facts 
otherwise available is warranted with respect to the PRC-wide entity, 
in accordance with sections 776(a)(2)(A) and (C) of the Act. The 
Department issued a Q&V questionnaire to the PRC-wide entity on 
December 2, 2016; \19\ however, the PRC-wide entity did not respond to 
the Department's Q&V questionnaire. As a result, we preliminarily find 
that the PRC-wide entity withheld necessary information that was 
requested by the Department, significantly impeding the proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See Department Letter to Liu Fang, First Secretary, Embassy 
of the People's Republic of China, dated December 2, 2016. See also 
Memorandum, ``Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China: Issuance of Quantity and Value 
Questionnaire to the PRC-wide Entity,'' dated December 8, 2016 
(containing Federal Express shipment and delivery confirmation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, the Department 
preliminarily determines that, because the PRC-wide entity failed to 
cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with the 
Department's requests for information, an adverse inference is 
warranted.

PRC-Wide Entity

    We preliminarily find that the following entities are part of the 
PRC-wide entity in this administrative review because they failed to 
submit a Q&V response, a SRA, a SRC, or (in the case of Kam Kiu) were 
selected as a mandatory respondent and failed to respond to the AD 
questionnaire: (1) Kam Kiu; (2) Atlas Integrated Manufacturing Ltd.; 
(3) Classic & Contemporary Inc.; (4) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware 
Industrial Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.; 
(6) Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (7) Shenyang 
Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (8) Sincere Profit 
Limited; and (9) Suzhou New Hongji Precision Part Co.
    The Department's change in policy regarding conditional review of 
the PRC-wide entity applies to this administrative review.\20\ Under 
this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a 
party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review 
of the entity. The petitioner \21\ requested a review of the PRC-wide 
entity in the instant review; therefore, the PRC-wide entity is 
currently under review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 
2013).
    \21\ The petitioner is the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade 
Committee, composed of the following members: Aerolite Extrusion 
Company; Alexandria Extrusion Company; William L. Bonnell Company, 
Inc.; Frontier Aluminum Corporation; Futura Industries Corporation; 
Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum Corporation; 
Profile Extrusion Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.; and Western 
Extrusions Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adjustments for Countervailable Subsidies

    Because no mandatory respondent established eligibility for an 
adjustment under section 777A(f) of the Act for countervailable 
domestic subsidies, for these preliminary results, the Department did 
not make an adjustment pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act for 
countervailable domestic subsidies for the separate-rate recipients.
    Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act, we made an adjustment 
for countervailable export subsidies for tenKsolar. We calculated this 
adjustment as the simple average of the countervailable export 
subsidies determined for the mandatory respondents in the 2014 (i.e., 
most recently completed) CVD administrative review \22\ and deducted 
this amount from the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to 
tenKsolar. \23\ The

[[Page 26058]]

adjusted rate for tenKsolar is 85.96 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2014, 81 FR 92778 (December 20, 2016).
    \23\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 12 and 17-18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act, we also made an 
adjustment for countervailable export subsidies for the PRC-wide 
entity. We adjusted the PRC-wide entity cash deposit rate by the lowest 
countervailable export subsidy determined for the mandatory respondents 
in the 2014 (i.e., most recently completed) CVD administrative 
review.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    The Department preliminarily determines that the following 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the 2015-2016 POR:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Margin
                                                               adjusted
                                                  Weighted-      for
                                                   average   liquidation
                    Exporter                       dumping     and cash
                                                   margin      deposit
                                                  (percent)    purposes
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd..................       86.01        85.96
PRC-wide Entity................................       86.01        85.96
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, as explained above, the Department preliminarily 
determines that the following companies are part of the PRC-wide 
entity: (1) Kam Kiu; (2) Atlas Integrated Manufacturing Ltd.; (3) 
Classic & Contemporary Inc.; (4) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware 
Industrial Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.; 
(6) Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd.; (7) Shenyang 
Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co. Ltd.; (8) Sincere Profit 
Limited; and (9) Suzhou New Hongji Precision Part Co.

Disclosure and Public Comment

    Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the 
calculations performed in connection with its preliminary results 
within five days of its public announcement or, if there is no public 
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because the 
Department did not calculate weighted-average dumping margins for 
either of the individually examined companies, Kam Kiu and tenKsolar, 
in this review, nor for the PRC-wide entity, there are no calculations 
to disclose.
    Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days 
after the date of publication of these preliminary results of 
review.\25\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case 
briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the case briefs are 
filed.\26\ Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with 
the argument (a) a statement of the issue, (b) a brief summary of the 
argument, and (c) a table of authorities.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
    \26\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
    \27\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of 
publication of this notice.\28\ Hearing requests should contain the 
following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone 
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to 
be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in 
the case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, 
parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be 
held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \29\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed 
electronically using ACCESS.\30\ An electronically filed document must 
be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic 
records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due date. 
Documents excepted from the electronic submission requirements must be 
filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in Room 
18022 and stamped with the date and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the 
due date.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
    \31\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the 
final results of this administrative review, which will include the 
results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 
120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal 
Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuance of the final results of this review, the Department 
will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries covered by this review.\32\ The Department intends 
to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of 
the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries containing subject 
merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate. 
Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter under 
review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended 
entries that entered under that exporter's case number will be 
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping 
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of 
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or 
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(c)(1)(i). We will instruct CBP accordingly.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements for estimated antidumping 
duties, when imposed, will apply to all shipments of subject 
merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this 
administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: 
(1) If the companies preliminarily determined to be eligible for a 
separate rate receive a separate rate in the final results of this 
administrative review, their cash deposit rate will be equal to the 
weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of 
this review, as adjusted for domestic and export subsidies (except, if 
that rate is de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) 
for any previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters 
that are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but that 
received a separate rate in the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have 
not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 
will be that for the PRC-wide entity; (4) for the PRC-wide entity, the 
cash deposit rate will be 85.96 percent; \34\ and (5) for all non-PRC 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC 
exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ This rate is adjusted for export subsidies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of

[[Page 26059]]

their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing notice of these preliminary results 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: May 31, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum:

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Respondent Selection
V. Rescission of Administrative Review in Part
VI. Preliminary Determination Regarding tenKsolar's Reported Sales
VII. NME Country
VIII. Separate Rates
IX. PRC-Wide Entity
X. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference
XI. The PRC-Wide Entity
XII. Adjustments for Countervailable Subsidies
XIII. Conclusion

Appendix II

Companies for Which This Administrative Review Is Being Rescinded

1. Acro Import and Export Co.
2. Activa International Inc.
3. Allied Maker Limited
4. Alnan Aluminium Co., Ltd.
5. Aluminicaste Fundicion de Mexico
6. AMC Ltd.
7. Belton (Asia) Development Ltd.
8. Birchwoods (Lin'an) Leisure Products Co., Ltd.
9. Bolnar Hong Kong Ltd.
10. Bracalente Metal Products (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
11. Changshu Changshen Aluminium Products Co., Ltd.
12. Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd.
13. Changzhou Tenglong Auto Parts Co., Ltd.
14. China Square
15. China Square Industrial Co.
16. China Zhongwang Holdings, Ltd.
17. Chiping One Stop Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd.
18. Clear Sky Inc.
19. Cosco (J.M.) Aluminium Co., Ltd.
20. Dalian Huacheng Aquatic Products
21. Dalian Liwang Trade Co., Ltd.
22. Danfoss Micro Channel Heat Exchanger (Jia Xing) Co., Ltd.
23. Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd.
24. Dongguan Dazhan Metal Co., Ltd.
25. Dragonluxe Limited
26. Dynabright Int'l Group (HK) Limited
27. Dynamic Technologies China Ltd.
28. Ever Extend Ent. Ltd.
29. Fenghua Metal Product Factory
30. First Union Property Limited
31. FookShing Metal & Plastic Co. Ltd.
32. Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou New & High-Tech Industrial 
Development Zone
33. Foshan City Nanhai Hongjia Aluminum Alloy Co., Ltd.
34. Foshan Golden Source Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.
35. Foshan Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd.
36. Foshan Jinlan Aluminum Co. Ltd.
37. Foshan JMA Aluminum Company Limited
38. Foshan Sanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co., Ltd.
39. Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.
40. Foshan Yong Li Jian Aluminum Co., Ltd.
41. Fujian Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
42. Fuzhou Sunmodo New Energy Equipment
43. Genimex Shanghai, Ltd.
44. Global PMX Dongguan Co., Ltd.
45. Global Point Technology (Far East) Limited
46. Gold Mountain International Development Limited
47. Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc.
48. Gran Cabrio Capital Pte. Ltd.
49. Gree Electric Appliances
50. GT Capital Pte. Ltd.
51. Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd.
52. Guang Ya Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd.
53. Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd.
54. Guangdong Jianmei Aluminum Profile Company Limited
55. Guangdong JMA Aluminum Profile Factory (Group) Co., Ltd.
56. Guangdong Nanhai Foodstuffs Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
57. Guangdong Weiye Aluminum Factory Co., Ltd.
58. Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.
59. Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd.
60. Guangdong Xin Wei Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.
61. Guangdong Yonglijian Aluminum Co., Ltd.
62. Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited
63. Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd.
64. Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware Products Co., Ltd.
65. Hangzhou Xingyi Metal Products Co., Ltd.
66. Hanwood Enterprises Limited
67. Hanyung Alcoba Co., Ltd.
68. Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd.
69. Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
70. Hao Mei Aluminum Co., Ltd.
71. Hao Mei Aluminum International Co., Ltd.
72. Hebei Xusen Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd.
73. Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.
74. Hong Kong Gree Electric Appliances Sales Limited
75. Hong Kong Modern Non-Ferrous Metal
76. Honsense Development Company
77. Hui Mei Gao Aluminum Foshan Co., Ltd.
78. IDEX Dinglee Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
79. IDEX Technology Suzhou Co., Ltd.
80. IDEX Health
81. Innovative Aluminium (Hong Kong) Limited
82. iSource Asia
83. Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.
84. Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd.
85. Jiangmen Jianghai District Foreign Economic Enterprise Corp. 
Ltd.
86. Jiangmen Jianghai Foreign Ent. Gen.
87. Jiangmen Qunxing Hardware Diecasting Co., Ltd.
88. Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd.
89. Jiangyin Suncitygaylin
90. Jiangyin Trust International Inc.
91. Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows Co., Ltd.
92. Jiaxing Taixin Metal Products Co., Ltd.
93. Jiuyan Co., Ltd.
94. JMA (HK) Company Limited
95. Justhere Co., Ltd.
96. Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co., Ltd.
97. Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd.
98. Kong Ah International Company Limited
99. Kromet International, Inc.
100. Kunshan Giant Light Metal Technology Co., Ltd.
101. Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd.
102. Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd.
103. Longkou Donghai Trade Co., Ltd.
104. Metaltek Group Co., Ltd.
105. Metaltek Metal Industry Co., Ltd.
106. Midea Air Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd.
107. Midea International Trading Co., Ltd.
108. Midea International Training Co., Ltd.
109. Miland Luck Limited
110. Nanhai Textiles Import & Export Co., Ltd.
111. New Asia Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.
112. New Zhongya Aluminum Factory
113. Nidec Sankyo (Zhejang) Corporation
114. Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd.
115. Ningbo Coaster International Co., Ltd.
116. Ningbo Hi Tech Reliable Manufacturing Company
117. Ningbo Ivy Daily Commodity Co., Ltd.
118. Ningbo Yili Import and Export Co., Ltd.
119. North China Aluminum Co., Ltd.
120. North Fenghua Aluminum Ltd.
121. Northern States Metals
122. PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited
123. Pengcheng Aluminum Enterprise Inc.
124. Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited
125. Permasteelisa South China Factory
126. Pingguo Aluminum Company Limited
127. Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd.
128. Popular Plastics Co., Ltd.
129. Press Metal International Ltd.
130. Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd.
131. Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
132. Shangdong Huasheng Pesticide Machinery Co.

[[Page 26060]]

133. Shangdong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
134. Shanghai Automobile Air Conditioner Accessories Ltd.
135. Shanghai Canghai Aluminum Tube Packaging Co., Ltd.
136. Shanghai Dongsheng Metal
137. Shanghai Shen Hang Imp & Exp Co., Ltd.
138. Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
139. Shenzhen Hudson Technology Development Co.
140. Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd.
141. Sihui Shi Guo Yao Aluminum Co., Ltd.
142. Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
143. Southwest Aluminum (Group) Co., Ltd.
144. Suzhou JRP Import & Export Co., Ltd.
145. Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd.
146. Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
147. Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation, Ltd.
148. Taizhou United Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
149. Tianjin Ganglv Nonferrous Metal Materials Co., Ltd.
150. Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd.
151. Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat Transmission Technology, Ltd.
152. Tianjin Xiandai Plastic & Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.
153. Tiazhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation
154. Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd.
155. Traffic Brick Network, LLC
156. Union Aluminum (SIP) Co.
157. Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd.
158. USA Worldwide Door Components (PINGHU) Co., Ltd.
159. Wenzhou Shengbo Decoration & Hardware
160. Whirlpool (Guangdong)
161. Whirlpool Canada L.P.
162. Whirlpool Microwave Products Development Ltd.
163. WTI Building Products, Ltd.
164. Xin Wei Aluminum Co.
165. Xin Wei Aluminum Company Limited
166. Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.
167. Yuyao Fanshun Import & Export Co., Ltd.
168. Yuyao Haoshen Import & Export
169. Zahoqing China Square Industry Limited
170. Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum Factory Company Ltd.
171. Zhaoqing China Square Industrial Ltd.
172. Zhaoqing China Square Industry Limited
173. Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd.
174. Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co., Ltd.
175. Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd.
176. Zhejiang Zhengte Group Co., Ltd.
177. Zhenjiang Xinlong Group Co., Ltd.
178. Zhongshan Daya Hardware Co., Ltd.
179. Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminium Factory Ltd.
180. Zhongya Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited
181. Zhuhai Runxingtai Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2017-11665 Filed 6-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P