Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 25771-25773 [2017-11564]
Download as PDF
25771
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
Net subsidy
rate (percent)
Producer/exporter
Jiangsu Changbao Steel Tube Co. and Jiangsu Changbao Precision Steel Tube Co., Ltd ..............................................................
Tianjin Pipe (Group) Co., Tianjin Pipe Iron Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Tianguan Yuantong Pipe Product Co., Ltd., Tianjin Pipe
International Economic and Trading Co., Ltd., and TPCO Charging Development Co., Ltd .........................................................
Wuxi Seamless Pipe Co, Ltd., Jiangsu Fanli Steel Pipe Co, Ltd., Tuoketuo County Mengfeng Special Steel Co., Ltd ...................
Zhejiang Jianli Enterprise Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Jianli Steel Steel Tube Co., Ltd., Zhuji Jiansheng Machinery Co., Ltd., and
Zhejiang Jianli Industry Group Co., Ltd ...........................................................................................................................................
All-Others .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Cash Deposit Requirements
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Because there has been a subsequent
administrative review for Wuxi, the
cash deposit rate for Wuxi will remain
the rate established in the final results
of the 2012 administrative review,
which is 59.29 percent.11 Because there
have been no subsequent administrative
reviews for Changbao, TPCO, and Jianli,
the Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
set the cash deposit rates for these
companies to the rates listed above,
again, pending a final and conclusive
court decision.12
Pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A) of the
Act, companies not individually
investigated are assigned an ‘‘all-others’’
countervailable duty rate. As a general
rule, the all-others rate is equal to the
weighted average countervailable
subsidy rates established for
individually investigated producers and
producers, excluding any zero and de
minimis countervailable subsidy rates.13
The Department will instruct CBP that
the ‘‘all-others’’ cash deposit rate is to
be amended to reflect the weightedaverage of the revised subsidy rates
calculated for Changbao, TPCO, Wuxi,
and Jianli, as listed above.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
705(c)(1)(B), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
International Trade Administration
Dated: May 30, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–11562 Filed 6–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
11 See
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012,
79 FR 52301 (September 3, 2014).
12 As explained in the Remand Redetermination,
the Department established new cash deposit rates
for TPCO and all-others in proceedings conducted
under section 129 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act. See Implementation of
Determinations Pursuant to Section 129 of the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 81 FR 37180,
37182 (June 9, 2016). The Department used these
revised rates as the basis for calculating revised
cash deposit rates in the Remand Redetermination.
See Remand Redetermination at 56.
13 See section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
[C–475–837; C–489–832]
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod From
Italy and the Republic of Turkey:
Postponement of Preliminary
Determinations of Countervailing Duty
Investigations
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective June 5, 2017.
John
Corrigan and Yasmin Bordas at (202)
482–7438 and (202) 482–3813,
respectively (Italy); Justin Neuman and
Omar Qureshi at (202) 482–0486 and
(202) 482–5307, respectively (Turkey),
AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
On April 17, 2017, the Department of
Commerce (Department) initiated
countervailing duty investigations
(CVD) on carbon and alloy steel wire
rod from Italy and the Republic of
Turkey (Turkey).1 Currently, the
preliminary determinations of these
investigations are due no later than June
21, 2017.
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), requires the
Department to issue the preliminary
determination in a CVD investigation
within 65 days after the date on which
the Department initiated the
investigation. However, if the petitioner
makes a timely request for a
postponement, section 703(c)(1)(A) of
the Act allows the Department to
postpone making the preliminary
determination until no later than 130
1 See Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Italy
and Turkey: Initiation of Countervailing Duty
Investigations, 82 FR 19213 (April 26, 2017).
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28.70
21.48
29.48
30.56
27.08
days after the date on which the
Department initiated the investigation.
On May 25, 2017, Nucor Corporation
(Nucor), a petitioner in the underlying
investigation, submitted timely requests
pursuant to section 703(c)(1)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.205(e) to postpone
the preliminary determinations.2 For the
reasons stated above and because there
are no compelling reasons to deny the
requests, the Department, in accordance
with section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is
postponing the deadline for the
preliminary determinations to no later
than 130 days after the day on which
the investigations were initiated.
Accordingly, the Department will issue
the preliminary determinations no later
than August 25, 2017. In accordance
with section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the
final determinations of these
investigations will continue to be 75
days after the date of the preliminary
determinations, unless postponed at a
later date.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: May 30, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–11563 Filed 6–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–832]
Pure Magnesium From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
AGENCY:
2 See Nucor letter re: Carbon and Certain Alloy
Steel Wire Rod from Italy: Request to Postpone
Preliminary Determination, dated May 25, 2017 (C–
475–837); see also Nucor letter re: Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from the Republic of
Turkey: Request to Postpone Preliminary
Determination, dated May 25, 2017 (C–489–832).
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
25772
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
On January 30, 2017, the
Department of Commerce (Department)
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on pure magnesium from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC) covering the
period May 1, 2015 through April 30,
2016. This review covers Tianjin
Magnesium International, Co., Ltd.
(TMI) and Tianjin Magnesium Metal,
Co., Ltd (TMM). The Department
preliminarily found that TMI and TMM
did not have reviewable entries during
the period of review (POR). The
Department gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the
Preliminary Results, but we received no
comments. Hence, the final results are
unchanged from the Preliminary
Results, and we continue to find that
TMI/TMM did not have reviewable
entries during the period of review
(POR).
DATES: Effective June 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Terpstra or Brendan Quinn, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3965 or (202) 482–5848,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Background
On January 30, 2017, the Department
published the Preliminary Results.1 We
invited interested parties to comment on
the Preliminary Results,2 but no
comments were received.
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
Merchandise covered by the order is
pure magnesium regardless of
chemistry, form or size, unless expressly
excluded from the scope of the order.
Pure magnesium is a metal or alloy
containing by weight primarily the
element magnesium and produced by
decomposing raw materials into
magnesium metal. Pure primary
magnesium is used primarily as a
chemical in the aluminum alloying,
desulfurization, and chemical reduction
industries. In addition, pure magnesium
is used as an input in producing
magnesium alloy. Pure magnesium
1 See Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 8720
(January 30, 2017) (Preliminary Results).
2 Id., 82 FR at 8721.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
encompasses products (including, but
not limited to, butt ends, stubs, crowns
and crystals) with the following primary
magnesium contents:
(1) Products that contain at least
99.95% primary magnesium, by weight
(generally referred to as ‘‘ultra pure’’
magnesium);
(2) Products that contain less than
99.95% but not less than 99.8% primary
magnesium, by weight (generally
referred to as ‘‘pure’’ magnesium); and
(3) Products that contain 50% or
greater, but less than 99.8% primary
magnesium, by weight, and that do not
conform to ASTM specifications for
alloy magnesium (generally referred to
as ‘‘off-specification pure’’ magnesium).
‘‘Off-specification pure’’ magnesium
is pure primary magnesium containing
magnesium scrap, secondary
magnesium, oxidized magnesium or
impurities (whether or not intentionally
added) that cause the primary
magnesium content to fall below 99.8%
by weight. It generally does not contain,
individually or in combination, 1.5% or
more, by weight, of the following
alloying elements: Aluminum,
manganese, zinc, silicon, thorium,
zirconium and rare earths.
Excluded from the scope of the order
are alloy primary magnesium (that
meets specifications for alloy
magnesium), primary magnesium
anodes, granular primary magnesium
(including turnings, chips and powder)
having a maximum physical dimension
(i.e., length or diameter) of one inch or
less, secondary magnesium (which has
pure primary magnesium content of less
than 50% by weight), and remelted
magnesium whose pure primary
magnesium content is less than 50% by
weight.
Pure magnesium products covered by
the order are currently classifiable
under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) subheadings
8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.20.00,
8104.30.00, 8104.90.00, 3824.90.11,
3824.90.19 and 9817.00.90. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the scope is
dispositive.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted above, the Department
received no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results on the record of this
segment of the proceeding. As there are
no changes from, or comments on, the
Preliminary Results, the Department
finds that there is no reason to modify
its analysis. Thus, we continue to find
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that TMI/TMM 3 had no shipments of
the subject merchandise, and, therefore,
no reviewable transactions, during the
POR.4 Accordingly, no decision
memorandum accompanies this Federal
Register notice. For further details of the
issues addressed in this proceeding, see
the Preliminary Results.
Assessment Rates
The Department determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b).5 The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review.
Additionally, consistent with the
Department’s refinement to its
assessment practice in non-market
economy cases, because the Department
determined that TMI/TMM had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR, any suspended entries
of subject merchandise during the POR
from TMI/TMM will be liquidated at the
PRC-wide rate.6
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of this notice of final
results of the administrative review, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) For TMI/TMM, which claimed
no shipments, the cash deposit rate will
remain unchanged from the rate
assigned to TMI/TMM in the most
recently completed review of the
company; (2) for previously investigated
or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
who are not under review in this
segment of the proceeding but who have
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
for all PRC exporters of subject
3 In the 2011–2012 administrative review of the
order, the Department determined TMM and TMI
to be collapsed and treated as a single company for
purposes of the proceeding and, because there were
no changes to the facts which supported that
decision since that determination was made, we
continue to find that these companies are part of a
single entity for this administrative review. See
Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2011–2012, 79 FR 94
(January 2, 2014) and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 5.
4 See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 8721.
5 See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
6 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate
of 111.73 percent; 7 and (4) for all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise
which have not received their own rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: May 30, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–11564 Filed 6–2–17; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
7 See Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results of the 2008–2009
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 80791 (December
23, 2010).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–357–821 and C–560–831]
Biodiesel From Argentina and
Indonesia: Postponement of
Preliminary Determinations of
Countervailing Duty Investigations
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective June 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi
Blum (Argentina) at (202) 482–0197, or
Joseph Traw (Indonesia) at (202) 482–
6079, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On April 12, 2017, the Department of
Commerce (Department) initiated
countervailing duty investigations
(CVD) on biodiesel from Argentina and
Indonesia.1 Currently, the preliminary
determinations of these investigations
are due no later than June 16, 2017.
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), requires the
Department to issue the preliminary
determination in a CVD investigation
within 65 days after the date on which
the Department initiated the
investigation. However, section
703(c)(1)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.205(e) allow the Department to
postpone the preliminary determination
at the request of the petitioner.
On May 22, 2017, the petitioner 2
submitted a timely request pursuant to
section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(e) to postpone the
preliminary determinations.3 For the
reasons stated above and because there
are no compelling reasons to deny the
request, the Department, in accordance
with section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is
postponing the deadline for the
preliminary determinations to no later
than 130 days after the day on which
the investigations were initiated.
Accordingly, the Department will issue
1 See Biodiesel from Argentina and Indonesia:
Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 82
FR 18423 (April 19, 2017).
2 The National Biodiesel Board Fair Trade
Coalition and its individual members.
3 See letter from the petitioner entitled ‘‘Biodiesel
from Argentina and Indonesia: Request For
Postponement Of The Preliminary Determinations,’’
dated May 22, 2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25773
the preliminary determinations no later
than August 20, 2017. However, because
August 20, 2017 falls on a Sunday, the
preliminary determinations are now due
no later than August 21, 2017.4 In
accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the
deadline for the final determinations of
these investigations will continue to be
75 days after the date of the preliminary
determinations, unless postponed at a
later date.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: May 26, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–11435 Filed 6–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–970]
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Reviews; 2014–2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 28, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results, and partial rescission, of the
new shipper reviews of the antidumping
duty (AD) order on multilayered wood
flooring (MLWF) from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). Based on our
analysis of the comments received, we
continue to find Zhejiang Simite
Wooden Co., Ltd.’s (Simite Wooden)
sale to be non-bona fide. Therefore, we
are rescinding the new shipper review
(NSR) with respect to Simite Wooden.
We also continue to find that Jiangsu
Keri Wood Co., Ltd. (Keri Wood) did not
make a sale at less than normal value
(NV), and is eligible for a separate rate.
The final dumping margin for Keri
Wood is listed in the ‘‘Final Results of
Kerri Wood’s New Shipper Review’’
section of this notice, below.
DATES: Effective June 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maisha Cryor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
AGENCY:
4 See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 106 (Monday, June 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25771-25773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11564]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-832]
Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
[[Page 25772]]
SUMMARY: On January 30, 2017, the Department of Commerce (Department)
published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium
from the People's Republic of China (PRC) covering the period May 1,
2015 through April 30, 2016. This review covers Tianjin Magnesium
International, Co., Ltd. (TMI) and Tianjin Magnesium Metal, Co., Ltd
(TMM). The Department preliminarily found that TMI and TMM did not have
reviewable entries during the period of review (POR). The Department
gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary
Results, but we received no comments. Hence, the final results are
unchanged from the Preliminary Results, and we continue to find that
TMI/TMM did not have reviewable entries during the period of review
(POR).
DATES: Effective June 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Terpstra or Brendan Quinn, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3965 or (202)
482-5848, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 30, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary
Results.\1\ We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results,\2\ but no comments were received.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-
2016, 82 FR 8720 (January 30, 2017) (Preliminary Results).
\2\ Id., 82 FR at 8721.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
Merchandise covered by the order is pure magnesium regardless of
chemistry, form or size, unless expressly excluded from the scope of
the order. Pure magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight
primarily the element magnesium and produced by decomposing raw
materials into magnesium metal. Pure primary magnesium is used
primarily as a chemical in the aluminum alloying, desulfurization, and
chemical reduction industries. In addition, pure magnesium is used as
an input in producing magnesium alloy. Pure magnesium encompasses
products (including, but not limited to, butt ends, stubs, crowns and
crystals) with the following primary magnesium contents:
(1) Products that contain at least 99.95% primary magnesium, by
weight (generally referred to as ``ultra pure'' magnesium);
(2) Products that contain less than 99.95% but not less than 99.8%
primary magnesium, by weight (generally referred to as ``pure''
magnesium); and
(3) Products that contain 50% or greater, but less than 99.8%
primary magnesium, by weight, and that do not conform to ASTM
specifications for alloy magnesium (generally referred to as ``off-
specification pure'' magnesium).
``Off-specification pure'' magnesium is pure primary magnesium
containing magnesium scrap, secondary magnesium, oxidized magnesium or
impurities (whether or not intentionally added) that cause the primary
magnesium content to fall below 99.8% by weight. It generally does not
contain, individually or in combination, 1.5% or more, by weight, of
the following alloying elements: Aluminum, manganese, zinc, silicon,
thorium, zirconium and rare earths.
Excluded from the scope of the order are alloy primary magnesium
(that meets specifications for alloy magnesium), primary magnesium
anodes, granular primary magnesium (including turnings, chips and
powder) having a maximum physical dimension (i.e., length or diameter)
of one inch or less, secondary magnesium (which has pure primary
magnesium content of less than 50% by weight), and remelted magnesium
whose pure primary magnesium content is less than 50% by weight.
Pure magnesium products covered by the order are currently
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheadings 8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.20.00, 8104.30.00,
8104.90.00, 3824.90.11, 3824.90.19 and 9817.00.90. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope is dispositive.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted above, the Department received no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results on the record of this segment of the proceeding. As
there are no changes from, or comments on, the Preliminary Results, the
Department finds that there is no reason to modify its analysis. Thus,
we continue to find that TMI/TMM \3\ had no shipments of the subject
merchandise, and, therefore, no reviewable transactions, during the
POR.\4\ Accordingly, no decision memorandum accompanies this Federal
Register notice. For further details of the issues addressed in this
proceeding, see the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In the 2011-2012 administrative review of the order, the
Department determined TMM and TMI to be collapsed and treated as a
single company for purposes of the proceeding and, because there
were no changes to the facts which supported that decision since
that determination was made, we continue to find that these
companies are part of a single entity for this administrative
review. See Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012,
79 FR 94 (January 2, 2014) and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 5.
\4\ See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 8721.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of
subject merchandise in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.212(b).\5\ The Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final
results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, consistent with the Department's refinement to its
assessment practice in non-market economy cases, because the Department
determined that TMI/TMM had no shipments of subject merchandise during
the POR, any suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR
from TMI/TMM will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice of
final results of the administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For TMI/TMM, which claimed no shipments,
the cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to
TMI/TMM in the most recently completed review of the company; (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters who are
not under review in this segment of the proceeding but who have
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject
[[Page 25773]]
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 111.73 percent; \7\
and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of the 2008-2009 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 80791 (December 23,
2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: May 30, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-11564 Filed 6-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P