Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Eliminate Requirements That Will Be Duplicative of CAT, 25872-25879 [2017-11508]
Download as PDF
25872
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
shares from a Fund of Funds, and to
engage in the accompanying in-kind
transactions with the Fund of Funds.3
The purchase of Creation Units by a
Fund of Funds directly from a Fund will
be accomplished in accordance with the
policies of the Fund of Funds and will
be based on the NAVs of the Funds.
9. Applicants also request relief to
permit a Feeder Fund to acquire shares
of another registered investment
company managed by the Adviser
having substantially the same
investment objectives as the Feeder
Fund (‘‘Master Fund’’) beyond the
limitations in section 12(d)(1)(A) and
permit the Master Fund, and any
principal underwriter for the Master
Fund, to sell shares of the Master Fund
to the Feeder Fund beyond the
limitations in section 12(d)(1)(B).
10. Section 6(c) of the Act permits the
Commission to exempt any persons or
transactions from any provision of the
Act if such exemption is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act
provides that the Commission may
exempt any person, security, or
transaction, or any class or classes of
persons, securities, or transactions, from
any provision of section 12(d)(1) if the
exemption is consistent with the public
interest and the protection of investors.
Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the
Commission to grant an order
permitting a transaction otherwise
prohibited by section 17(a) if it finds
that (a) the terms of the proposed
transaction are fair and reasonable and
do not involve overreaching on the part
of any person concerned; (b) the
proposed transaction is consistent with
the policies of each registered
investment company involved; and (c)
the proposed transaction is consistent
with the general purposes of the Act.
[FR Doc. 2017–11510 Filed 6–2–17; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
3 The requested relief would apply to direct sales
of shares in Creation Units by a Fund to a Fund of
Funds and redemptions of those shares. Applicants,
moreover, are not seeking relief from section 17(a)
for, and the requested relief will not apply to,
transactions where a Fund could be deemed an
Affiliated Person, or a Second-Tier Affiliate, of a
Fund of Funds because an Adviser or an entity
controlling, controlled by or under common control
with an Adviser provides investment advisory
services to that Fund of Funds.
17:31 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
[Release No. 34–80814; File No. SR–BX–
2017–027]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Eliminate
Requirements That Will Be Duplicative
of CAT
May 30, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 30,
2017, NASDAQ BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6950 relating to the Order Audit
Trail System, Rule 8211 and Chapter IX,
Section IV relating to Electronic Blue
Sheets, Chapter VII, Section VII relating
to account identification, and Chapter
V, Section VII relating to the
Consolidated Options Audit Trail
System to reflect changes to these rules
once members are effectively reporting
to the Consolidated Audit Trail (‘‘CAT’’)
and the CAT’s accuracy and reliability
meets certain standards as described
below.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://nasdaqbx.cchwallstreet.com/,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the most significant aspects of such
statements..
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6950 relating to the Order Audit
Trail System (‘‘OATS’’), Rule 8211 and
Chapter IX, Section IV relating to
Electronic Blue Sheets (‘‘EBS’’), Chapter
VII, Section VII relating to account
identification, and Chapter V, Section
VII relating to the Consolidated Options
Audit Trail System (‘‘COATS’’) to reflect
changes to these rules once members are
effectively reporting to the CAT, and the
CAT’s accuracy and reliability meets
certain standards as described below.3
Background
Bats BYX Exchange, Inc.; Bats BZX
Exchange, Inc.; Bats EDGA Exchange,
Inc.; Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc.; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; C2 Options
Exchange, Incorporated; Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; FINRA;
International Securities Exchange, LLC;
Investors’ Exchange LLC; ISE Gemini,
LLC; ISE Mercury, LLC; Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC;
MIAX PEARL, LLC; NASDAQ BX, Inc.;
NASDAQ PHLX LLC; The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC; National Stock
Exchange, Inc.; New York Stock
Exchange LLC; NYSE MKT LLC; and
NYSE Arca, Inc. (collectively, the
‘‘Participants’’) filed with the
Commission, pursuant to Section 11A of
the Exchange Act 4 and Rule 608 of
Regulation NMS thereunder,5 the
National Market System Plan Governing
the Consolidated Audit Trail (the ‘‘CAT
NMS Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’).6 The
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed rule
change on May 15, 2017 (SR–BX–2017–025). On
May 30, 2017, the Exchange withdrew that filing
and submitted this filing.
4 15 U.S.C. 78k–1.
5 17 CFR 242.608.
6 See Letter from the Participants to Brent J.
Fields, Secretary, Commission, dated September 30,
2014; and Letter from Participants to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission, dated February 27, 2015.
On December 24, 2015, the Participants submitted
an amendment to the CAT NMS Plan. See Letter
from Participants to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission, dated December 23, 2015.
ISE Gemini, LLC, ISE Mercury, LLC and
International Securities Exchange, LLC have been
renamed Nasdaq GEMX, LLC, Nasdaq MRX, LLC,
and Nasdaq ISE, LLC, respectively. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 80248 (March 15, 2017),
82 FR 14547 (March 21, 2017); Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 80326 (March 29, 2017), 82 FR
16460 (April 4, 2017); and Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 80325 (March 29, 2017), 82 FR 16445
(April 4, 2017).
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Participants filed the Plan to comply
with Rule 613 of Regulation NMS under
the Exchange Act.7 The Plan was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on May 17, 2016,8 and
approved by the Commission, as
modified, on November 15, 2016.9 On
March 15, 2017, the Commission
approved the new BX Rule 6800 Series
and Chapter IX, Section 8 to implement
provisions of the CAT NMS Plan that
are applicable to BX members.10
The CAT NMS Plan is designed to
create, implement, and maintain a
consolidated audit trail that will capture
in a single consolidated data source
customer and order event information
for orders in NMS Securities and OTC
Equity Securities, across all markets,
from the time of order inception through
routing, cancellation, modification, or
execution. Among other things, Section
C.9. of Appendix C to the Plan, as
modified by the Commission, requires
each Participant to ‘‘file with the SEC
the relevant rule change filing to
eliminate or modify its duplicative rules
within six (6) months of the SEC’s
approval of the CAT NMS Plan.’’ 11 The
Plan notes that ‘‘the elimination of such
rules and the retirement of such systems
[will] be effective at such time as CAT
Data meets minimum standards of
accuracy and reliability.’’ 12 Finally, the
Plan requires the rule filing to discuss
the following:
(i) specific accuracy and reliability
standards that will determine when
duplicative systems will be retired,
including, but not limited to, whether
the attainment of a certain Error Rate
should determine when a system
duplicative of the CAT can be retired;
(ii) whether the availability of certain
data from Small Industry Members two
years after the Effective Date would
facilitate a more expeditious retirement
of duplicative systems; and
(iii) whether individual Industry
Members can be exempted from
reporting to duplicative systems once
their CAT reporting meets specified
accuracy and reliability standards,
including, but not limited to, ways in
which establishing cross-system
National Stock Exchange, Inc. has been renamed
NYSE National, Inc. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 79902 (Jan. 30, 2017), 82 FR 9258
(February 3, 2017).
7 17 CFR 242.613.
8 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77724
(April 27, 2016), 81 FR 30614 (May 17, 2016).
9 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79318
(November 15, 2016), 81 FR 84696 (November 23,
2016) (‘‘Approval Order’’).
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80256
(March 15, 2017), 82 FR 14526 (March 21, 2017)
(SR–BX–2017–007).
11 CAT NMS Plan, Appendix C, Section C.9.
12 See id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
regulatory functionality or integrating
data from existing systems and the CAT
would facilitate such Individual
Industry Member exemptions.13
Changes to OATS
In response to these requirements, BX
is proposing to delete Rule 6950 (the
‘‘OATS Rules’’) from the BX rulebook
once the CAT achieves the specific
accuracy and reliability standards
described below, and BX has
determined that its usage of the CAT
Data has not revealed material issues
that have not been corrected, confirmed
that the CAT includes all data necessary
to allow BX to continue to meet its
surveillance obligations,14 and
confirmed that the Plan Processor is
sufficiently meeting all of its obligations
under the CAT NMS Plan.15
Specific Accuracy and Reliability
Standards
The first issue the Plan requires the
proposed rule change to discuss is
‘‘specific accuracy and reliability
standards that will determine when
duplicative systems will be retired,
including, but not limited to, whether
the attainment of a certain Error Rate
should determine when a system
duplicative of the CAT can be
retired.’’ 16 BX believes that relevant
error rates are the primary, but not the
sole, metric by which to determine the
CAT’s accuracy and reliability and will
serve as the baseline requirement
needed before OATS can be retired to
account for information being available
in the CAT.
As discussed in Section A.3.(b) of
Appendix C to the CAT NMS Plan, the
13 See
id.
noted in the Participants’ September 23,
2016 response to comment letters on the Plan, the
Participants ‘‘worked to keep [the CAT] gap
analyses up-to-date by including newly-added data
fields in these duplicative systems, such as the new
OATS data fields related to the tick size pilot and
ATS order book changes, in the gap analyses.’’ See
Letter from Participants to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission, dated September 23, 2016, at 21. The
Participants noted that they ‘‘will work with the
Plan Processor and the industry to develop detailed
Technical Specifications to ensure that by the time
Industry Members are required to report to the CAT,
the CAT will include all data elements necessary
to facilitate the rapid retirement of duplicative
systems.’’ Id.
15 BX notes that the OATS Rules were originally
proposed to fulfill one of the undertakings
contained in an order issued by the Commission
relating to the settlement of an enforcement action
against the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. for failure to adequately enforce its
rules. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
39729 (March 6, 1998), 63 FR 12559 (March 13,
1998). In approving the OATS Rules, the
Commission concluded that OATS satisfied the
conditions of the SEC’s order and was consistent
with the Exchange Act. See id. at 12566–67.
16 See id. [sic]
14 As
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25873
Participants established an initial Error
Rate, as defined in the Plan, of 5% on
initially submitted data (i.e., data as
submitted by a CAT Reporter before any
required corrections are performed). The
Participants noted in the Plan that their
expectation was that ‘‘error rates after
reprocessing of error corrections will be
de minimis.’’ 17 The Participants based
this Error Rate on their consideration of
‘‘current and historical OATS Error
Rates, the magnitude of new reporting
requirements on the CAT Reporters and
the fact that many CAT Reporters may
have never been obligated to report data
to an audit trail.’’ 18
BX agrees with the Participants’
conclusion that a 5% pre-correction
threshold ‘‘strikes the balance of
adapting to a new reporting regime,
while ensuring that the data provided to
regulators will be capable of being used
to conduct surveillance and market
reconstruction, as well as having a
sufficient level of accuracy to facilitate
the retirement of existing regulatory
reports and systems where possible.’’ 19
However, BX believes that, when
assessing the accuracy and reliability of
the data for the purposes of retiring
OATS, the error thresholds should be
measured in more granular ways and
should also include minimum error
rates of post-correction data, which
represents the data most likely to be
used by BX to conduct surveillance.
Although BX is proposing to measure
the appropriate error rates in the
aggregate, rather than firm-by-firm, BX
believes that the error rates for equity
securities should be measured
separately from options since options
orders are not currently reported
regularly or included in OATS.
To ensure the CAT’s accuracy and
reliability, BX is proposing that, before
OATS could be retired, the CAT would
generally need to achieve a sustained
error rate for Industry Member reporting
in each of the categories below for a
period of at least 180 days of 5% or
lower, measured on a pre-correction or
as-submitted basis and 2% or lower on
a post-correction basis (measured at
T+5).20 BX is proposing to measure the
5% pre-correction and 2% postcorrection thresholds by averaging the
error rate across the period, not require
a 5% pre-correction and 2% postcorrection maximum each day for 180
17 See CAT NMS Plan, Appendix C, Section
A.3(b), at n.102.
18 Id.
19 Id.
20 The Plan requires that the Plan Processor must
ensure that regulators have access to corrected and
linked order and Customer data by 8:00 a.m.
Eastern Time on T+5. See CAT NMS Plan,
Appendix C, Section A.2(a).
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
25874
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
consecutive days. BX believes that
measuring each of the thresholds over
the course of 180 days will ensure that
the CAT consistently meets minimum
accuracy and reliability thresholds for
Industry Member reporting while also
ensuring that single-day measurements
do not unduly affect the overall
measurements.
BX is proposing to use error rates in
each the following categories, measured
separately for options and for equities,
to assess whether the threshold pre- and
post-correction error rates are being met:
• Rejection Rates and Data
Validations. Data validations for the
CAT, while not expected to be designed
the same as OATS, must be functionally
equivalent to OATS in accordance with
the CAT NMS Plan (i.e., the same types
of basic data validations must be
performed by the Plan Processor to
comply with the CAT NMS Plan
requirements). Appendix D of the Plan,
for example, requires that certain file
validations 21 and syntax and context
checks be performed on all submitted
records.22 If a record does not pass these
basic data validations, it must be
rejected and returned to the CAT
Reporter to be corrected and
resubmitted.23 The specific validations
can be determined only after the Plan
Processor has finalized the Industry
Member Technical Specifications;
however, the Plan also requires the Plan
Processor to provide daily statistics on
rejection rates after the data has been
processed, including the number of files
rejected and accepted, the number of
order events accepted and rejected, and
the number of each type of report
rejected.24 BX is proposing that, over the
180-day period, aggregate rejection rates
(measured separately for equities and
options) must be no more than 5% pre21 See CAT NMS Plan, Appendix D, Section 7.2.
The Plan requires the Plan Processor to confirm that
file transmission and receipt are in the correct
formats, including validation of header and trailers
on the submitted report, confirmation of a valid
Exchange [sic]-Assigned Market Participant
Identifier, and verification of the number of records
in the file. Id.
22 See id. The Plan notes that syntax and context
checks would include format checks (i.e., that data
is entered in the specified format); data type checks
(i.e., that the data type of each attribute conforms
to the specifications); consistency checks (i.e., that
all attributes for a record of a specified type are
consistent); range/logic checks (i.e., that each
attribute for every record has a value within
specified limits and the values provided are
associated with the event type they represent); data
validity checks (i.e., that each attribute for every
record has an acceptable value); completeness
checks (i.e., that each mandatory attribute for every
record is not null); and timeliness checks (i.e., that
the records were submitted within the submission
timelines). Id.
23 See id.
24 See id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
correction or 2% post-correction across
all CAT Reporters.
• Intra-Firm Linkages. The Plan
requires that ‘‘the Plan Processor must
be able to link all related order events
from all CAT Reporters involved in the
lifecycle of an order.’’ 25 At a minimum,
this requirement includes the creation
of an order lifecycle between ‘‘[a]ll order
events handled within an individual
CAT Reporter, including orders routed
to internal desks or departments with
different functions (e.g., an internal
ATS).’’ 26 BX is proposing that aggregate
intra-firm linkage rates across all
Industry Member Reporters must be at
least 95% pre-correction and 98% postcorrection.
• Inter-Firm Linkages. The order
linkage requirements in the Plan also
require that the Plan Processor be able
to create the lifecycle between orders
routed between broker-dealers.27 BX is
proposing that at least a 95% precorrection and 98% post-correction
aggregate match rate be achieved for
orders routed between two Industry
Member Reporters.28
• Order Linkage Rates. In addition to
creating linkages within and between
broker-dealers, the Plan also includes
requirements that the Plan Processor be
able to create lifecycles to link various
pieces of related orders.29 For example,
the Plan requires linkages between
customer orders and ‘‘representative’’
orders created in firm accounts for the
purpose of facilitating a customer order,
various legs of option/equity complex
orders, riskless principal orders, and
orders worked through average price
accounts.30 BX is proposing that there
be at least a 95% pre-correction and
98% post-correction linkage rate for
multi-legged orders (e.g., related equity/
options orders, VWAP orders, riskless
principal transactions).
• Exchange and TRF/ORF Match
Rates. The Plan requires that an order
lifecycle be created to link ‘‘[o]rders
routed from broker-dealers to
exchanges’’ and ‘‘[e]xecuted orders and
trade reports.’’ 31 BX is proposing at
least a 95% pre-correction and 98%
post-correction aggregate match rate to
each equity exchange for orders routed
from Industry Members to an exchange
and, for over-the-counter executions, the
25 CAT
NMS Plan, Appendix D, Section 3.
26 Id.
27 Id.
28 This assumes linkage statistics will include
both unlinked route reports and new orders where
no related route report could be found.
29 See CAT NMS Plan, Appendix D, Section 3.
30 See id.
31 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
same match rate for orders linked to
trade reports.
In addition to these minimum error
rates and matching thresholds that
generally must be met before OATS can
be retired, BX believes that during the
minimum 180-day period during which
the thresholds are calculated, BX’s use
of the data in the CAT must confirm that
(i) usage over that time period has not
revealed material issues that have not
been corrected, (ii) the CAT includes all
data necessary to allow BX to continue
to meet its surveillance obligations, and
(iii) the Plan Processor is sufficiently
meeting all of its obligations under the
CAT NMS Plan. BX believes this time
period to use the CAT Data is necessary
to reveal any errors that may manifest
themselves only after surveillance
patterns and other queries have been
run and to confirm that the Plan
Processor is meeting its obligations and
performing its functions adequately.
Small Industry Member Data
Availability
The second issue the Plan requires the
proposed rule change to address is
‘‘whether the availability of certain data
from Small Industry Members two years
after the Effective Date would facilitate
a more expeditious retirement of
duplicative systems.’’
BX believes that there is no effective
way to retire OATS until all current
OATS reporters are reporting to the
CAT. Although Technical Specifications
for Industry Members are not yet
available, BX believes it would be
inefficient, less reliable, and more costly
to attempt to marry the OATS and CAT
databases for a temporary period to
allow some BX members to report to
CAT while others continue to report to
OATS. Consequently, BX has concluded
at this time that having data from those
Small Industry Members currently
reporting to OATS available two years
after the Effective Date would
substantially facilitate a more
expeditious retirement of OATS. For
this reason, BX supports an amendment
to the Plan that would require current
OATS Reporters that are ‘‘Small
Industry Members’’ to report two years
after the Effective Date (instead of
three). BX intends to work with the
other Participants to submit a proposed
amendment to the Plan to require Small
Industry Members that are OATS
Reporters to report two years after the
Effective Date.
BX has identified approximately 300
member firms that currently report to
OATS and meet the definition of ‘‘Small
Industry Member;’’ however, only ten of
these firms submit information to OATS
on their own behalf, and eight of the ten
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
firms report very few orders to OATS.32
The vast majority of these 300 firms use
third parties to fulfill their reporting
obligations, and many of these third
parties will begin reporting to CAT in
November 2018. Consequently, BX
believes that the burden on current
OATS Reporters that are ‘‘Small
Industry Members’’ would not be
significant if those firms are required to
report to CAT beginning in November
2018 rather than November 2019. The
burdens, however, are significantly
greater for those firms that are not
reporting to OATS currently; therefore,
BX does not believe it would be
necessary or appropriate to accelerate
CAT reporting for ‘‘Small Industry
Members’’ that are not currently
reporting to OATS, and BX would not
support an amendment to the Plan to
accelerate CAT reporting for ‘‘Small
Industry Members’’ that are not
currently OATS Reporters.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Individual Industry Member
Exemptions
The final issue the Plan requires the
proposed rule change to address is
‘‘whether individual Industry Members
can be exempted from reporting to
duplicative systems once their CAT
reporting meets specified accuracy and
reliability standards, including, but not
limited to, ways in which establishing
cross-system regulatory functionality or
integrating data from existing systems
and the CAT would facilitate such
Individual Industry Member
exemptions.’’
As described above, BX believes that
a single cut-over from OATS to CAT is
highly preferable to a firm-by-firm
approach and is not proposing to
exempt members from the OATS
requirements on a firm-by-firm basis.
The primary benefit to a firm-by-firm
exemptive approach would be to reduce
the amount of time an individual firm
is required to report to a legacy system
(e.g., OATS) if it is also accurately and
reliably reporting to the CAT. BX
believes that the overall accuracy and
reliability thresholds for the CAT
described above would need to be met
under any conditions before firms could
stop reporting to OATS. Moreover, as
discussed above, BX supports amending
the Plan to accelerate the reporting
requirements for Small Industry
Members that are OATS Reporters to
report on the same timeframe as all
other OATS Reporters. If such an
amendment were approved by the
32 For example, in one recent month, eight of the
ten firms submitted fewer than 100 reports during
the month, with four firms submitting fewer than
50.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
Commission, there would be no need to
exempt members from OATS
requirements on a firm-by-firm basis.
Changes to EBS and Account
Identification Rules
The EBS rule is BX’s rule regarding
the automated submission of specific
trading data to BX upon request using
the Electronic Blue Sheet system. Rule
8211 applies to EBS reporting for equity
securities, while Chapter IX, Section 4
applies EBS reporting to options. Rule
8211 and Chapter IX, Section 4 require
members to submit certain trade
information as prescribed by BX
Regulation, including, for proprietary
transactions, the clearing house number
or alpha symbol of the member
submitting the data, the identifying
symbol assigned to the security, and the
date the transaction was executed.
Chapter VII, Section VII imposes
certain account identification
requirements on Market Makers.
Specifically, Chapter VII, Section VII
requires, among other things, that each
Market Maker shall file with BX
Regulation and keep current a list
identifying all accounts for stock,
options and related securities trading in
which the Market Maker may, directly
or indirectly, engage in trading activities
or over which it exercises investment
discretion. The rule also prohibits a
Market Maker from engaging in stock,
options or related securities trading in
an account which has not been reported
pursuant to this rule.
Once broker-dealer reporting to the
CAT has begun, the CAT will contain
the data the Participants would
otherwise have requested via the EBS
system for purposes of NMS Securities
and OTC Equity Securities.
Consequently, BX will not need to use
the EBS system or request information
pursuant to these rules for NMS
Securities or OTC Equity Securities for
time periods after CAT reporting has
begun if the appropriate accuracy and
reliability thresholds are achieved,
including an acceptable accuracy rate
for customer and account information.
However, these rules cannot be
completely eliminated immediately
upon the CAT achieving the appropriate
thresholds because BX Regulation staff
may still need to request information
pursuant to these rules for trading
activity occurring before a member was
reporting to the CAT.33 In addition,
33 Firms are required to maintain the trade
information for pre-CAT transactions in equities
and options pursuant to applicable rules, such as
books and records retention requirements, for the
relevant time period, which is generally three or six
years depending upon the record. See 17 CFR
240.17a–3(a), 240.17a–4.
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25875
these rules apply to information
regarding transactions involving
securities that will not be reportable to
the CAT, such as fixed-income
securities; thus, these rules must remain
in effect with respect to those
transactions indefinitely or until those
transactions are captured in the CAT.
The proposed rule change proposes to
add new Supplementary Material to
Rule 8211, Chapter VII, Section VII, and
Chapter IX, Section 4 to clarify how BX
will request data under these rules after
members are reporting to the CAT.
Specifically, the proposed
Supplementary Material to these rules
will note that BX Regulation will
request information under these rules
only if the information is not available
in the CAT because, for example, the
transactions in question occurred before
the firm was reporting information to
the CAT or involved securities that are
not reportable to the CAT. In essence,
under the new Supplementary Material,
BX Regulation will make requests under
these rules if and only if the information
is not otherwise available through the
CAT.
The CAT NMS Plan states, however,
that the elimination of rules that are
duplicative of the requirements of the
CAT and the retirement of the related
systems should be effective at such time
as CAT Data meets minimum standards
of accuracy and reliability.34
Accordingly, as discussed in more detail
below, BX believes that the EBS data
may be replaced by CAT Data at a date
after all Industry Members are reporting
to the CAT when the proposed error rate
thresholds have been met, and BX has
determined that its usage of the CAT
Data has not revealed material issues
that have not been corrected, confirmed
that the CAT includes all data necessary
to allow BX to continue to meet its
surveillance obligations, and confirmed
that the Plan Processor is sufficiently
meeting all of its obligations under the
CAT NMS Plan.
BX believes CAT Data should not be
used in place of EBS data until all
Participants and Industry Members are
reporting data to CAT. In this way, BX
will continue to have access to the
necessary data to perform its regulatory
duties.
The CAT NMS Plan requires that a
rule filing to eliminate a duplicative
rule address whether ‘‘the availability of
certain data from Small Industry
Members two years after the Effective
Date would facilitate a more expeditious
retirement of duplicative systems.’’ 35
34 Id.
[sic]
35 Id.
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
25876
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
BX believes that the submission of data
to the CAT by Small Industry Members
a year earlier than is required in the
CAT NMS Plan, at the same time as the
other Industry Members, would
expedite the replacement of EBS data
with CAT Data, as BX believes that the
CAT would then have all necessary data
from the Industry Members for BX to
perform the regulatory surveillance that
currently is performed via EBS. For this
reason, BX supports amending the CAT
NMS Plan to require Small Industry
Members to report data to the CAT two
years after the Effective Date (instead of
three), and intends to work with other
Participants toward that end.
The CAT NMS Plan requires that this
rule filing address ‘‘whether individual
Industry Members can be exempted
from reporting to duplicative systems
once their CAT reporting meets
specified accuracy and reliability
standards, including, but not limited to,
ways in which establishing cross-system
regulatory functionality or integrating
data from existing systems and the CAT
would facilitate such Individual
Industry Member exemptions.’’ 36 BX
believes that a single cut-over from EBS
to CAT is highly preferable to a firm-byfirm approach and is not proposing to
exempt members from the EBS
requirements on a firm-by-firm basis.
BX believes that providing such
individual exemptions to Industry
Members would be inefficient, more
costly, and less reliable than the single
cut-over. Providing individual
exemptions would require the
exchanges to create, for a brief
temporary period, a cross-system
regulatory function and to integrate data
from EBS and the CAT to avoid creating
any regulatory gaps as a result of such
exemptions. Such a function would be
costly to create and would give rise to
a greater likelihood of data errors or
other issues. Given the limited time in
which such exemptions would be
necessary, BX does not believe that such
exemptions would be an appropriate
use of limited resources. Moreover, the
primary benefit to a firm-by-firm
exemptive approach would be to reduce
the amount of time an individual firm
is required to comply with EBS if it is
also accurately and reliably reporting to
the CAT. BX believes that the overall
accuracy and reliability thresholds for
the CAT described above would need to
be met under any conditions before
firms could stop reporting to EBS, and
as discussed above, by accelerating
Small Industry Members to report on
the same timeframe as all other Industry
Members, there is no need to exempt
36 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
members from EBS requirements on a
firm-by-firm basis.
The CAT NMS Plan also requires that
a rule filing to eliminate a duplicative
rule to provide ‘‘specific accuracy and
reliability standards that will determine
when duplicative systems will be
retired, including, but not limited to,
whether the attainment of a certain
Error Rate should determine when a
system duplicative of the CAT can be
retired.’’ 37 BX believes that it is critical
that the CAT Data be sufficiently
accurate and reliable for BX to perform
the regulatory functions that it now
performs via EBS. Accordingly, BX
believes that the CAT Data should meet
specific quantitative error rates, as well
as certain qualitative requirements.
BX believes that, before CAT Data
may be used in place of EBS data, the
CAT would need to achieve a sustained
error rate for a period of at least 180
days of 5% or lower measured on a precorrection or as-submitted basis, and
2% or lower on a post-correction basis
(measured at T+5).38 BX proposes to
measure the 5% pre-correction and 2%
post-correction thresholds by averaging
the error rate across the period, not
require a 5% pre-correction and 2%
post-correction maximum each day for
180 consecutive days. BX believes that
measuring each of the thresholds over
the course of 180 days will ensure that
the CAT consistently meets minimum
accuracy and reliability thresholds
while also ensuring that single-day
measurements do not unduly affect the
overall measurements. BX proposes to
measure the appropriate error rates in
the aggregate, rather than firm-by-firm.
The 2% and 5% error rates are in line
with the proposed retirement threshold
for other systems, such as OATS and
COATS.
In addition to these minimum error
rates before using CAT Data instead of
EBS data, BX believes that during the
minimum 180-day period during which
the thresholds are calculated, BX’s use
of the data in the CAT must confirm that
(i) usage over that time period has not
revealed material issues that have not
been corrected, (ii) the CAT includes all
data necessary to allow BX to continue
to meet its surveillance obligations, and
(iii) the Plan Processor is sufficiently
meeting all of its obligations under the
CAT NMS Plan. BX believes this time
period to use the CAT Data is necessary
to reveal any errors that may manifest
themselves only after surveillance
37 Id.
38 The Plan requires that the Plan Processor must
ensure that regulators have access to corrected and
linked order and Customer data by 8:00 a.m.
Eastern Time on T+5. See CAT NMS Plan, at C–15.
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
patterns and other queries have been
run and to confirm that the Plan
Processor is meeting its obligations and
performing its functions adequately.
Changes to COATS
The options exchanges utilize COATS
to collect and review data regarding
options orders, quotes and transactions.
The Participants have provided COATS
technical specifications to the Plan
Processor for the CAT for use in
developing the Technical Specifications
for the CAT, and the Participants are
working with the Plan Processor to
include the necessary COATS data
elements in the CAT Technical
Specifications. Accordingly, although
the Technical Specifications for the
CAT have not yet been finalized, BX
and the other options exchanges
propose to eliminate COATS in
accordance with the proposed timeline
discussed below.
BX adopted Chapter V, Section 7 to
implement certain reporting
requirements related to COATS, and
therefore proposes to eliminate the
information reporting requirements of
that rule and replacing those
requirements with a requirement that
members report information pursuant to
this rule as required by the Exchange’s
CAT compliance rule, Chapter IX,
Section 8.39 Among other things,
Chapter V, Section 7 requires an
Options Participant to ensure that each
options order received from a Customer
for execution on BX Options is recorded
and time-stamped immediately, and
also at the time of any modification or
cancellation of the order. The rule also
specifies the information that must be
39 COATS was developed to comply with an order
of the Commission requiring the then-options
exchanges to ‘‘design and implement’’ a
consolidated audit trail to ‘‘enable the options
exchanges to reconstruct markets promptly,
effectively surveil them and enforce order handling,
firm quote, trade reporting and other rules.’’ See
Section IV.B.e.(v) of the Commission’s Order
Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings
Pursuant to Sections 19(h)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings and
Imposing Remedial Sanctions (the ‘‘Order’’). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43268
(September 11, 2000) and Administrative
Proceeding File No. 3–10282. As noted, the Plan is
designed to create, implement and maintain a CAT
that would capture customer and order event
information for orders in NMS Securities and OTC
Equity Securities, across all markets, from the time
of order inception through routing, cancellation,
modification, or execution in a single consolidated
data source. BX has already adopted rules to
enforce compliance by its Industry Members, as
applicable, with the provisions of the Plan. Once
the CAT is fully operational, it will be appropriate
to delete BX’s rules implemented to comply with
the Order as duplicative of the CAT. Accordingly,
BX believes that it would continue to be in
compliance with the requirements of the Order
once the CAT is fully operational and the COATS
rules are deleted.
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
contained at a minimum, including a
unique order identification, the
underlying security, opening/closing
designation, the identity of the Clearing
Participant, and the Options Participant
identification.
The CAT NMS Plan states that the
elimination of rules that are duplicative
of the requirements of the CAT and the
retirement of the related systems should
be effective at such time as CAT Data
meets minimum standards of accuracy
and reliability.40 As discussed in more
detail below, BX and the other options
exchanges believe that COATS may be
retired at a date after all Industry
Members are reporting to the CAT when
the proposed error rate thresholds have
been met, and BX has determined that
its usage of the CAT Data has not
revealed material issues that have not
been corrected, confirmed that the CAT
includes all data necessary to allow BX
to continue to meet its surveillance
obligations, and confirmed that the Plan
Processor is sufficiently meeting all of
its obligations under the CAT NMS
Plan.
BX believes COATS should not be
retired until all Participants and
Industry Members that report data to
COATS are reporting comparable data to
the CAT. In this way, BX will continue
to have access to the necessary data to
perform its regulatory duties.
The CAT NMS Plan requires that a
rule filing to eliminate a duplicative
rule address whether ‘‘the availability of
certain data from Small Industry
Members two years after the Effective
Date would facilitate a more expeditious
retirement of duplicative systems.’’ 41
The Exchange believes COATS should
not be retired until all Participants and
Industry Members that report data to
COATS are reporting comparable data to
the CAT. While the early submission of
options data to the CAT by Small
Industry Members could expedite the
retirement of COATS, the Exchange
believes that it premature to consider
such a change and that additional
analysis would be necessary to
determine whether such early reporting
by Small Industry Members would be
feasible.
The CAT NMS Plan requires that this
rule filing address ‘‘whether individual
Industry Members can be exempted
from reporting to duplicative systems
once their CAT reporting meets
specified accuracy and reliability
standards, including, but not limited to,
ways in which establishing cross-system
regulatory functionality or integrating
data from existing systems and the CAT
40 Id.
[sic]
41 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
would facilitate such Individual
Industry Member exemptions.’’ 42 BX
believes that a single cut-over from
COATS to CAT is highly preferable to
a firm-by-firm approach and is not
proposing to exempt members from the
COATS requirements on a firm-by-firm
basis. BX and the other options
exchanges believe that providing such
individual exemptions to Industry
Members would be inefficient, more
costly, and less reliable than the single
cut-over. Providing individual
exemptions would require the options
exchanges to create, for a brief
temporary period, a cross-system
regulatory function and to integrate data
from COATS and the CAT to avoid
creating any regulatory gaps as a result
of such exemptions. Such a function
would be costly to create and would
give rise to a greater likelihood of data
errors or other issues. Given the limited
time in which such exemptions would
be necessary, BX and the other options
exchanges do not believe that such
exemptions would be an appropriate
use of limited resources.
The CAT NMS Plan also requires that
a rule filing to eliminate a duplicative
rule to provide ‘‘specific accuracy and
reliability standards that will determine
when duplicative systems will be
retired, including, but not limited to,
whether the attainment of a certain
Error Rate should determine when a
system duplicative of the CAT can be
retired.’’ 43 BX believes that it is critical
that the CAT Data be sufficiently
accurate and reliable for the Exchange to
perform the regulatory functions that it
now performs via COATS. Accordingly,
BX believes that the CAT Data should
meet specific quantitative error rates, as
well as certain qualitative requirements.
BX and the other options exchanges
believe that, before COATS may be
retired, the CAT would need to achieve
a sustained error rate for a period of at
least 180 days of 5% or lower measured
on a pre-correction or as-submitted
basis, and 2% or lower on a postcorrection basis (measured at T+5).44 BX
proposes to measure the 5% precorrection and 2% post-correction
thresholds by averaging the error rate
across the period, not require a 5% precorrection and 2% post-correction
maximum each day for 180 consecutive
days. BX believes that measuring each
of the thresholds over the course of 180
days will ensure that the CAT
consistently meets minimum accuracy
42 Id.
43 Id.
44 The Plan requires that the Plan Processor must
ensure that regulators have access to corrected and
linked order and Customer data by 8:00 a.m.
Eastern Time on T+5. See CAT NMS Plan, at C–15.
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25877
and reliability thresholds while also
ensuring that single-day measurements
do not unduly affect the overall
measurements. BX proposes to measure
the appropriate error rates in the
aggregate, rather than firm-by-firm. In
addition, BX proposes to measure the
error rates for options only, not equity
securities, as only options are subject to
COATS. The 2% and 5% error rates are
in line with the proposed retirement
threshold for OATS.
In addition to these minimum error
rates before COATS can be retired, BX
believes that during the minimum 180day period during which the thresholds
are calculated, BX’s use of the data in
the CAT must confirm that (i) usage
over that time period has not revealed
material issues that have not been
corrected, (ii) the CAT includes all data
necessary to allow BX to continue to
meet its surveillance obligations, and
(iii) the Plan Processor is sufficiently
meeting all of its obligations under the
CAT NMS Plan. BX believes this time
period to use the CAT Data is necessary
to reveal any errors that may manifest
themselves only after surveillance
patterns and other queries have been
run and to confirm that the Plan
Processor is meeting its obligations and
performing its functions adequately.
If the Commission approves the
proposed rule change, BX will
announce the implementation date of
the proposed rule change in a
Regulatory Notice that will be published
once BX concludes the thresholds for
accuracy and reliability described above
have been met and that the Plan
Processor is sufficiently meeting all of
its obligations under the CAT NMS
Plan.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,45 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,46
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest.
BX believes that the proposed rule
change fulfills the obligation in the CAT
NMS Plan for BX to submit a proposed
rule change to eliminate or modify
duplicative rules. In approving the Plan,
the SEC noted that the Plan ‘‘is
necessary and appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors
and the maintenance of fair and orderly
45 15
46 15
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
05JNN1
25878
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
markets, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanism of a national
market system, or is otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.’’ 47 As this proposal implements the
Plan, BX believes that this proposal
furthers the objectives of the Plan, as
identified by the SEC, and is therefore
consistent with the Exchange Act.
Moreover, the purpose of the
proposed rule change is to eliminate
rules that require the submission of
duplicative data to the exchange. The
elimination of such duplicative
requirements will reduce unnecessary
costs and other compliance burdens for
BX and its members, and therefore, will
enhance the efficiency of the securities
markets. Furthermore, BX believes that
the approach set forth in the proposed
rule change strikes the appropriate
balance between ensuring that BX is
able to continue to fulfill its statutory
obligation to protect investors and the
public interest by ensuring its
surveillance of market activity remains
accurate and effective while also
establishing a reasonable timeframe for
elimination or modification of its rules
that will be rendered duplicative after
implementation of the CAT.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
Section 6(b)(8) of the Exchange Act 48
requires that the Exchange’s rules not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate. BX does
not believe that the proposed rule
change will result in any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Exchange Act. BX notes
that the proposed rule change
implements the requirements of the
CAT NMS Plan approved by the
Commission regarding the elimination
of rules and systems that are duplicative
the CAT, and is designed to assist BX in
meeting its regulatory obligations
pursuant to the Plan. Similarly, all
exchanges and FINRA are proposing the
elimination of their rules related to
OATS, EBS and COATS to implement
the requirements of the CAT NMS Plan.
Therefore, this is not a competitive rule
filing and, therefore, it does not raise
competition issues between and among
the self-regulatory organizations and/or
their members.
47 Approval
48 15
Order at 84697.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Although written comments on the
proposed rule change were not solicited,
two commenters, the Financial
Information Forum (‘‘FIF’’) and the
Securities Industry and Financial
Markets Association (‘‘SIFMA’’),
submitted letters to the Participants
regarding the retirement of systems
related to the CAT.49 In its comment
letter, with regard to the retirement of
duplicative systems more generally, FIF
recommends that the Participants
continue the effort to incorporate
current reporting obligations into the
CAT in order to replace existing
reportable systems with the CAT. In
addition, FIF further recommends that,
once a CAT Reporter achieves
satisfactory reporting data quality, the
CAT Reporter should be exempt from
reporting to any duplicative reporting
systems. FIF believes that these
recommendations ‘‘would serve both an
underlying regulatory objective of more
immediate and accurate access to data
as well as an industry objective of
reduced costs and burdens of regulatory
oversight.’’ 50 In its comments about
EBS specifically, FIF states that the
retirement of the EBS requirements
should be a high priority, and that the
CAT should be designed to include the
requisite data elements to permit the
rapid retirement of the EBS system.51
Similarly, SIFMA states that ‘‘the
establishment of the CAT must be
accompanied by the prompt elimination
of duplicative systems,’’ and
‘‘recommend[ed] that the initial
technical specifications be designed to
facilitate the immediate retirement of
. . . duplicative reporting systems.’’ 52
As discussed above, BX agrees with
the commenters that the OATS, EBS and
COATS reporting requirements should
be replaced by the CAT reporting
requirements as soon as accurate and
reliable CAT Data is available. To this
end, BX anticipates that the CAT will be
designed to collect the data necessary to
permit the retirement of OATS, EBS and
COATS. As discussed above, BX
disagrees with the recommendation to
provide individual exemptions to those
49 Letter from William H. Hebert, FIF, to
Participants re: Milestone for Participants’ rule
change filings to eliminate/modify duplicative
rules, dated April 12, 2017 (‘‘FIF Letter’’); Letter
from Kenneth E. Bentsen, Jr., SIFMA, to
Participants re: Selection of Thesys as CAT
Processor, dated April 4, 2017 (‘‘SIFMA Letter’’), at
2.
50 FIF Letter at 2.
51 Id.
52 SIFMA Letter at 2.
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CAT Reporters who obtain satisfactory
data reporting quality; however, BX
supports amendments to the CAT NMS
Plan that would accelerate reporting for
Small Industry Members that are
currently reporting to OATS to facilitate
the retirement of that system.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission shall: (a) By order
approve or disapprove such proposed
rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BX–2017–027 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2017–027. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BX–
2017–027, and should be submitted on
or before June 26, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.53
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–11508 Filed 6–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–80806; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2017–53]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Adopting New NYSE Arca
Rule 11.21 and NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 5220, NYSE Arca Rule 10.18 and
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.16, and
Amending NYSE Arca Rule 10.17 and
NYSE Arca Equities 10.15
May 30, 2017.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 17,
2017, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange propose (1) a new
NYSE Arca Rule 11.21 and a new NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 5220 that define and
prohibit two types of disruptive quoting
and trading activity on the Exchange; (2)
53 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:41 Jun 02, 2017
Jkt 241001
a new NYSE Arca Rule 10.18 and a new
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.16
governing supplemental expedited
suspension proceedings; and (3)
amendments to NYSE Arca Rule 10.17
and NYSE Arca Equities 10.15 to permit
release to the public of suspension
notices and orders issued pursuant to
proposed NYSE Arca Rule 10.18 and
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.16,
respectively. The proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at www.nyse.com, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes (1) a new
NYSE Arca Rule 11.21 and NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 5220 that define and
prohibit two types of disruptive quoting
and trading activity on the Exchange; (2)
a new NYSE Arca Rule 10.18 and NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 10.16 governing
supplemental expedited suspension
proceedings; and (3) amendments to
NYSE Arca Rule 10.17 and NYSE Arca
Equities 10.15 to permit release to the
public of suspension notices and orders
issued pursuant to proposed NYSE Arca
Rule 10.18 and NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 10.16, respectively.
The proposed rule change is based on
rules recently adopted by Bats BZX
Exchange, Inc., formerly known as
BATS Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BATS’’), and
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘NASDAQ’’).3 The proposed rules are
3 On February 18, 2016, the SEC approved a
proposed rule change filed by BATS to adopt new
BATS Rule 12.15, which prohibits certain types of
disruptive quoting and trading activities, and BATS
Rule 8.17, which permits BATS to conduct a new
expedited suspension proceeding when it believes
BATS Rule 12.15 has been violated. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 77171 (February 18,
2016), 81 FR 9017 (February 23, 2016) (SR–BATS–
2015–101) (‘‘BATS Approval Order’’); see also
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25879
the same as those adopted by BATS and
NASDAQ, with the following
exceptions discussed below: (1)
Conforming references to reflect the
Exchange’s equities and options
membership and disciplinary process;
and (2) the call for review process in
proposed Rule NYSE Arca Rule 10.18(f)
and NYSE Arca Equities Rule 10.16(f).
The Exchange believes that having
consistent rules for issuing a cease and
desist order on an expedited basis as
other self-regulatory organizations
(‘‘SROs’’) to halt certain disruptive and
manipulative quoting and trading
activity would enhance the Exchange’s
ability to protect investors and market
integrity.
Background
As a national securities exchange
registered pursuant to Section 6 of the
Act, the Exchange is required to be
organized and to have the capacity to
enforce compliance by its member
organizations and persons associated
with its member organizations, with the
Act, the rules and regulations
thereunder, and the Exchange’s Rules.4
Further, the Exchange’s Rules are
required to be ‘‘designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade . . . and, in general,
to protect investors and the public
interest.’’ 5
In fulfilling these requirements, the
Exchange has developed a
comprehensive regulatory program that
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77606 (April
13, 2016), 81 FR 23026 (April 19, 2016) (SR–
BatsEDGA–2016–03) (adopting identical rules for
Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc.); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 77602 (April 13, 2016), 81 FR 23046
(April 19, 2016) (SR–BatsBYX–2016–03) (adopting
identical rules for Bats BYX Exchange, Inc.);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77589 (April
12, 2016), 81 FR 22691 (April 18, 2016) (SR–
BatsEDGX–2016–04) (adopting identical rules for
Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc.). On May 19, 2016,
NASDAQ filed a substantially similar proposed rule
change with the SEC for immediate effectiveness.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77913
(May 25, 2016), 81 FR 35081 (June 1, 2016) (SR–
NASDAQ–2016–074). NASDAQ has also extended
the rule to other exchanges. See, e.g., Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 78208 (June 30, 2016), 81
FR 44366 (July 7, 2016) (SR–NASDAQ–2016–092).
Similarly, the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) also recently prohibited
disruptive quoting and trading and amended its
procedural rules. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 76361 (November 21, 2016), 81 FR
85650 (November 28, 2016) (SR–FINRA–2016–043).
See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79182
(October 28, 2016), 81 FR 76639 (November 3, 2016)
(SR–MIAX–2016–40) (adopting identical rules for
Miami International Securities Exchange LLC);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79646
(December 21, 2016), 81 FR 95713 (December 28,
2016) (SR–BOX–2016–59) (adopting identical rules
for BOX Options Exchange LLC).
4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 106 (Monday, June 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25872-25879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11508]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-80814; File No. SR-BX-2017-027]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Proposed Rule Change To Eliminate Requirements That Will Be
Duplicative of CAT
May 30, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 30, 2017, NASDAQ BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6950 relating to the Order
Audit Trail System, Rule 8211 and Chapter IX, Section IV relating to
Electronic Blue Sheets, Chapter VII, Section VII relating to account
identification, and Chapter V, Section VII relating to the Consolidated
Options Audit Trail System to reflect changes to these rules once
members are effectively reporting to the Consolidated Audit Trail
(``CAT'') and the CAT's accuracy and reliability meets certain
standards as described below.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://nasdaqbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements..
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6950 relating to the Order
Audit Trail System (``OATS''), Rule 8211 and Chapter IX, Section IV
relating to Electronic Blue Sheets (``EBS''), Chapter VII, Section VII
relating to account identification, and Chapter V, Section VII relating
to the Consolidated Options Audit Trail System (``COATS'') to reflect
changes to these rules once members are effectively reporting to the
CAT, and the CAT's accuracy and reliability meets certain standards as
described below.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed rule change on May
15, 2017 (SR-BX-2017-025). On May 30, 2017, the Exchange withdrew
that filing and submitted this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
Bats BYX Exchange, Inc.; Bats BZX Exchange, Inc.; Bats EDGA
Exchange, Inc.; Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc.; BOX Options Exchange LLC; C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; FINRA; International
Securities Exchange, LLC; Investors' Exchange LLC; ISE Gemini, LLC; ISE
Mercury, LLC; Miami International Securities Exchange LLC; MIAX PEARL,
LLC; NASDAQ BX, Inc.; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
National Stock Exchange, Inc.; New York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE MKT
LLC; and NYSE Arca, Inc. (collectively, the ``Participants'') filed
with the Commission, pursuant to Section 11A of the Exchange Act \4\
and Rule 608 of Regulation NMS thereunder,\5\ the National Market
System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (the ``CAT NMS
Plan'' or ``Plan'').\6\ The
[[Page 25873]]
Participants filed the Plan to comply with Rule 613 of Regulation NMS
under the Exchange Act.\7\ The Plan was published for comment in the
Federal Register on May 17, 2016,\8\ and approved by the Commission, as
modified, on November 15, 2016.\9\ On March 15, 2017, the Commission
approved the new BX Rule 6800 Series and Chapter IX, Section 8 to
implement provisions of the CAT NMS Plan that are applicable to BX
members.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
\5\ 17 CFR 242.608.
\6\ See Letter from the Participants to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission, dated September 30, 2014; and Letter from
Participants to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, dated
February 27, 2015. On December 24, 2015, the Participants submitted
an amendment to the CAT NMS Plan. See Letter from Participants to
Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, dated December 23, 2015.
ISE Gemini, LLC, ISE Mercury, LLC and International Securities
Exchange, LLC have been renamed Nasdaq GEMX, LLC, Nasdaq MRX, LLC,
and Nasdaq ISE, LLC, respectively. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 80248 (March 15, 2017), 82 FR 14547 (March 21, 2017);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80326 (March 29, 2017), 82 FR
16460 (April 4, 2017); and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80325
(March 29, 2017), 82 FR 16445 (April 4, 2017).
National Stock Exchange, Inc. has been renamed NYSE National,
Inc. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79902 (Jan. 30, 2017),
82 FR 9258 (February 3, 2017).
\7\ 17 CFR 242.613.
\8\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77724 (April 27, 2016),
81 FR 30614 (May 17, 2016).
\9\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79318 (November 15,
2016), 81 FR 84696 (November 23, 2016) (``Approval Order'').
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80256 (March 15,
2017), 82 FR 14526 (March 21, 2017) (SR-BX-2017-007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CAT NMS Plan is designed to create, implement, and maintain a
consolidated audit trail that will capture in a single consolidated
data source customer and order event information for orders in NMS
Securities and OTC Equity Securities, across all markets, from the time
of order inception through routing, cancellation, modification, or
execution. Among other things, Section C.9. of Appendix C to the Plan,
as modified by the Commission, requires each Participant to ``file with
the SEC the relevant rule change filing to eliminate or modify its
duplicative rules within six (6) months of the SEC's approval of the
CAT NMS Plan.'' \11\ The Plan notes that ``the elimination of such
rules and the retirement of such systems [will] be effective at such
time as CAT Data meets minimum standards of accuracy and reliability.''
\12\ Finally, the Plan requires the rule filing to discuss the
following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ CAT NMS Plan, Appendix C, Section C.9.
\12\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) specific accuracy and reliability standards that will determine
when duplicative systems will be retired, including, but not limited
to, whether the attainment of a certain Error Rate should determine
when a system duplicative of the CAT can be retired;
(ii) whether the availability of certain data from Small Industry
Members two years after the Effective Date would facilitate a more
expeditious retirement of duplicative systems; and
(iii) whether individual Industry Members can be exempted from
reporting to duplicative systems once their CAT reporting meets
specified accuracy and reliability standards, including, but not
limited to, ways in which establishing cross-system regulatory
functionality or integrating data from existing systems and the CAT
would facilitate such Individual Industry Member exemptions.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes to OATS
In response to these requirements, BX is proposing to delete Rule
6950 (the ``OATS Rules'') from the BX rulebook once the CAT achieves
the specific accuracy and reliability standards described below, and BX
has determined that its usage of the CAT Data has not revealed material
issues that have not been corrected, confirmed that the CAT includes
all data necessary to allow BX to continue to meet its surveillance
obligations,\14\ and confirmed that the Plan Processor is sufficiently
meeting all of its obligations under the CAT NMS Plan.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ As noted in the Participants' September 23, 2016 response
to comment letters on the Plan, the Participants ``worked to keep
[the CAT] gap analyses up-to-date by including newly-added data
fields in these duplicative systems, such as the new OATS data
fields related to the tick size pilot and ATS order book changes, in
the gap analyses.'' See Letter from Participants to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission, dated September 23, 2016, at 21. The
Participants noted that they ``will work with the Plan Processor and
the industry to develop detailed Technical Specifications to ensure
that by the time Industry Members are required to report to the CAT,
the CAT will include all data elements necessary to facilitate the
rapid retirement of duplicative systems.'' Id.
\15\ BX notes that the OATS Rules were originally proposed to
fulfill one of the undertakings contained in an order issued by the
Commission relating to the settlement of an enforcement action
against the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. for
failure to adequately enforce its rules. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 39729 (March 6, 1998), 63 FR 12559 (March 13, 1998). In
approving the OATS Rules, the Commission concluded that OATS
satisfied the conditions of the SEC's order and was consistent with
the Exchange Act. See id. at 12566-67.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specific Accuracy and Reliability Standards
The first issue the Plan requires the proposed rule change to
discuss is ``specific accuracy and reliability standards that will
determine when duplicative systems will be retired, including, but not
limited to, whether the attainment of a certain Error Rate should
determine when a system duplicative of the CAT can be retired.'' \16\
BX believes that relevant error rates are the primary, but not the
sole, metric by which to determine the CAT's accuracy and reliability
and will serve as the baseline requirement needed before OATS can be
retired to account for information being available in the CAT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See id. [sic]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in Section A.3.(b) of Appendix C to the CAT NMS Plan,
the Participants established an initial Error Rate, as defined in the
Plan, of 5% on initially submitted data (i.e., data as submitted by a
CAT Reporter before any required corrections are performed). The
Participants noted in the Plan that their expectation was that ``error
rates after reprocessing of error corrections will be de minimis.''
\17\ The Participants based this Error Rate on their consideration of
``current and historical OATS Error Rates, the magnitude of new
reporting requirements on the CAT Reporters and the fact that many CAT
Reporters may have never been obligated to report data to an audit
trail.'' \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See CAT NMS Plan, Appendix C, Section A.3(b), at n.102.
\18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BX agrees with the Participants' conclusion that a 5% pre-
correction threshold ``strikes the balance of adapting to a new
reporting regime, while ensuring that the data provided to regulators
will be capable of being used to conduct surveillance and market
reconstruction, as well as having a sufficient level of accuracy to
facilitate the retirement of existing regulatory reports and systems
where possible.'' \19\ However, BX believes that, when assessing the
accuracy and reliability of the data for the purposes of retiring OATS,
the error thresholds should be measured in more granular ways and
should also include minimum error rates of post-correction data, which
represents the data most likely to be used by BX to conduct
surveillance. Although BX is proposing to measure the appropriate error
rates in the aggregate, rather than firm-by-firm, BX believes that the
error rates for equity securities should be measured separately from
options since options orders are not currently reported regularly or
included in OATS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure the CAT's accuracy and reliability, BX is proposing that,
before OATS could be retired, the CAT would generally need to achieve a
sustained error rate for Industry Member reporting in each of the
categories below for a period of at least 180 days of 5% or lower,
measured on a pre-correction or as-submitted basis and 2% or lower on a
post-correction basis (measured at T+5).\20\ BX is proposing to measure
the 5% pre-correction and 2% post-correction thresholds by averaging
the error rate across the period, not require a 5% pre-correction and
2% post-correction maximum each day for 180
[[Page 25874]]
consecutive days. BX believes that measuring each of the thresholds
over the course of 180 days will ensure that the CAT consistently meets
minimum accuracy and reliability thresholds for Industry Member
reporting while also ensuring that single-day measurements do not
unduly affect the overall measurements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The Plan requires that the Plan Processor must ensure that
regulators have access to corrected and linked order and Customer
data by 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time on T+5. See CAT NMS Plan, Appendix C,
Section A.2(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BX is proposing to use error rates in each the following
categories, measured separately for options and for equities, to assess
whether the threshold pre- and post-correction error rates are being
met:
Rejection Rates and Data Validations. Data validations for
the CAT, while not expected to be designed the same as OATS, must be
functionally equivalent to OATS in accordance with the CAT NMS Plan
(i.e., the same types of basic data validations must be performed by
the Plan Processor to comply with the CAT NMS Plan requirements).
Appendix D of the Plan, for example, requires that certain file
validations \21\ and syntax and context checks be performed on all
submitted records.\22\ If a record does not pass these basic data
validations, it must be rejected and returned to the CAT Reporter to be
corrected and resubmitted.\23\ The specific validations can be
determined only after the Plan Processor has finalized the Industry
Member Technical Specifications; however, the Plan also requires the
Plan Processor to provide daily statistics on rejection rates after the
data has been processed, including the number of files rejected and
accepted, the number of order events accepted and rejected, and the
number of each type of report rejected.\24\ BX is proposing that, over
the 180-day period, aggregate rejection rates (measured separately for
equities and options) must be no more than 5% pre-correction or 2%
post-correction across all CAT Reporters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See CAT NMS Plan, Appendix D, Section 7.2. The Plan
requires the Plan Processor to confirm that file transmission and
receipt are in the correct formats, including validation of header
and trailers on the submitted report, confirmation of a valid
Exchange [sic]-Assigned Market Participant Identifier, and
verification of the number of records in the file. Id.
\22\ See id. The Plan notes that syntax and context checks would
include format checks (i.e., that data is entered in the specified
format); data type checks (i.e., that the data type of each
attribute conforms to the specifications); consistency checks (i.e.,
that all attributes for a record of a specified type are
consistent); range/logic checks (i.e., that each attribute for every
record has a value within specified limits and the values provided
are associated with the event type they represent); data validity
checks (i.e., that each attribute for every record has an acceptable
value); completeness checks (i.e., that each mandatory attribute for
every record is not null); and timeliness checks (i.e., that the
records were submitted within the submission timelines). Id.
\23\ See id.
\24\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intra-Firm Linkages. The Plan requires that ``the Plan
Processor must be able to link all related order events from all CAT
Reporters involved in the lifecycle of an order.'' \25\ At a minimum,
this requirement includes the creation of an order lifecycle between
``[a]ll order events handled within an individual CAT Reporter,
including orders routed to internal desks or departments with different
functions (e.g., an internal ATS).'' \26\ BX is proposing that
aggregate intra-firm linkage rates across all Industry Member Reporters
must be at least 95% pre-correction and 98% post-correction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ CAT NMS Plan, Appendix D, Section 3.
\26\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inter-Firm Linkages. The order linkage requirements in the
Plan also require that the Plan Processor be able to create the
lifecycle between orders routed between broker-dealers.\27\ BX is
proposing that at least a 95% pre-correction and 98% post-correction
aggregate match rate be achieved for orders routed between two Industry
Member Reporters.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ Id.
\28\ This assumes linkage statistics will include both unlinked
route reports and new orders where no related route report could be
found.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Linkage Rates. In addition to creating linkages
within and between broker-dealers, the Plan also includes requirements
that the Plan Processor be able to create lifecycles to link various
pieces of related orders.\29\ For example, the Plan requires linkages
between customer orders and ``representative'' orders created in firm
accounts for the purpose of facilitating a customer order, various legs
of option/equity complex orders, riskless principal orders, and orders
worked through average price accounts.\30\ BX is proposing that there
be at least a 95% pre-correction and 98% post-correction linkage rate
for multi-legged orders (e.g., related equity/options orders, VWAP
orders, riskless principal transactions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See CAT NMS Plan, Appendix D, Section 3.
\30\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exchange and TRF/ORF Match Rates. The Plan requires that
an order lifecycle be created to link ``[o]rders routed from broker-
dealers to exchanges'' and ``[e]xecuted orders and trade reports.''
\31\ BX is proposing at least a 95% pre-correction and 98% post-
correction aggregate match rate to each equity exchange for orders
routed from Industry Members to an exchange and, for over-the-counter
executions, the same match rate for orders linked to trade reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to these minimum error rates and matching thresholds
that generally must be met before OATS can be retired, BX believes that
during the minimum 180-day period during which the thresholds are
calculated, BX's use of the data in the CAT must confirm that (i) usage
over that time period has not revealed material issues that have not
been corrected, (ii) the CAT includes all data necessary to allow BX to
continue to meet its surveillance obligations, and (iii) the Plan
Processor is sufficiently meeting all of its obligations under the CAT
NMS Plan. BX believes this time period to use the CAT Data is necessary
to reveal any errors that may manifest themselves only after
surveillance patterns and other queries have been run and to confirm
that the Plan Processor is meeting its obligations and performing its
functions adequately.
Small Industry Member Data Availability
The second issue the Plan requires the proposed rule change to
address is ``whether the availability of certain data from Small
Industry Members two years after the Effective Date would facilitate a
more expeditious retirement of duplicative systems.''
BX believes that there is no effective way to retire OATS until all
current OATS reporters are reporting to the CAT. Although Technical
Specifications for Industry Members are not yet available, BX believes
it would be inefficient, less reliable, and more costly to attempt to
marry the OATS and CAT databases for a temporary period to allow some
BX members to report to CAT while others continue to report to OATS.
Consequently, BX has concluded at this time that having data from those
Small Industry Members currently reporting to OATS available two years
after the Effective Date would substantially facilitate a more
expeditious retirement of OATS. For this reason, BX supports an
amendment to the Plan that would require current OATS Reporters that
are ``Small Industry Members'' to report two years after the Effective
Date (instead of three). BX intends to work with the other Participants
to submit a proposed amendment to the Plan to require Small Industry
Members that are OATS Reporters to report two years after the Effective
Date.
BX has identified approximately 300 member firms that currently
report to OATS and meet the definition of ``Small Industry Member;''
however, only ten of these firms submit information to OATS on their
own behalf, and eight of the ten
[[Page 25875]]
firms report very few orders to OATS.\32\ The vast majority of these
300 firms use third parties to fulfill their reporting obligations, and
many of these third parties will begin reporting to CAT in November
2018. Consequently, BX believes that the burden on current OATS
Reporters that are ``Small Industry Members'' would not be significant
if those firms are required to report to CAT beginning in November 2018
rather than November 2019. The burdens, however, are significantly
greater for those firms that are not reporting to OATS currently;
therefore, BX does not believe it would be necessary or appropriate to
accelerate CAT reporting for ``Small Industry Members'' that are not
currently reporting to OATS, and BX would not support an amendment to
the Plan to accelerate CAT reporting for ``Small Industry Members''
that are not currently OATS Reporters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ For example, in one recent month, eight of the ten firms
submitted fewer than 100 reports during the month, with four firms
submitting fewer than 50.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Industry Member Exemptions
The final issue the Plan requires the proposed rule change to
address is ``whether individual Industry Members can be exempted from
reporting to duplicative systems once their CAT reporting meets
specified accuracy and reliability standards, including, but not
limited to, ways in which establishing cross-system regulatory
functionality or integrating data from existing systems and the CAT
would facilitate such Individual Industry Member exemptions.''
As described above, BX believes that a single cut-over from OATS to
CAT is highly preferable to a firm-by-firm approach and is not
proposing to exempt members from the OATS requirements on a firm-by-
firm basis. The primary benefit to a firm-by-firm exemptive approach
would be to reduce the amount of time an individual firm is required to
report to a legacy system (e.g., OATS) if it is also accurately and
reliably reporting to the CAT. BX believes that the overall accuracy
and reliability thresholds for the CAT described above would need to be
met under any conditions before firms could stop reporting to OATS.
Moreover, as discussed above, BX supports amending the Plan to
accelerate the reporting requirements for Small Industry Members that
are OATS Reporters to report on the same timeframe as all other OATS
Reporters. If such an amendment were approved by the Commission, there
would be no need to exempt members from OATS requirements on a firm-by-
firm basis.
Changes to EBS and Account Identification Rules
The EBS rule is BX's rule regarding the automated submission of
specific trading data to BX upon request using the Electronic Blue
Sheet system. Rule 8211 applies to EBS reporting for equity securities,
while Chapter IX, Section 4 applies EBS reporting to options. Rule 8211
and Chapter IX, Section 4 require members to submit certain trade
information as prescribed by BX Regulation, including, for proprietary
transactions, the clearing house number or alpha symbol of the member
submitting the data, the identifying symbol assigned to the security,
and the date the transaction was executed.
Chapter VII, Section VII imposes certain account identification
requirements on Market Makers. Specifically, Chapter VII, Section VII
requires, among other things, that each Market Maker shall file with BX
Regulation and keep current a list identifying all accounts for stock,
options and related securities trading in which the Market Maker may,
directly or indirectly, engage in trading activities or over which it
exercises investment discretion. The rule also prohibits a Market Maker
from engaging in stock, options or related securities trading in an
account which has not been reported pursuant to this rule.
Once broker-dealer reporting to the CAT has begun, the CAT will
contain the data the Participants would otherwise have requested via
the EBS system for purposes of NMS Securities and OTC Equity
Securities. Consequently, BX will not need to use the EBS system or
request information pursuant to these rules for NMS Securities or OTC
Equity Securities for time periods after CAT reporting has begun if the
appropriate accuracy and reliability thresholds are achieved, including
an acceptable accuracy rate for customer and account information.
However, these rules cannot be completely eliminated immediately upon
the CAT achieving the appropriate thresholds because BX Regulation
staff may still need to request information pursuant to these rules for
trading activity occurring before a member was reporting to the
CAT.\33\ In addition, these rules apply to information regarding
transactions involving securities that will not be reportable to the
CAT, such as fixed-income securities; thus, these rules must remain in
effect with respect to those transactions indefinitely or until those
transactions are captured in the CAT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ Firms are required to maintain the trade information for
pre-CAT transactions in equities and options pursuant to applicable
rules, such as books and records retention requirements, for the
relevant time period, which is generally three or six years
depending upon the record. See 17 CFR 240.17a-3(a), 240.17a-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change proposes to add new Supplementary Material
to Rule 8211, Chapter VII, Section VII, and Chapter IX, Section 4 to
clarify how BX will request data under these rules after members are
reporting to the CAT. Specifically, the proposed Supplementary Material
to these rules will note that BX Regulation will request information
under these rules only if the information is not available in the CAT
because, for example, the transactions in question occurred before the
firm was reporting information to the CAT or involved securities that
are not reportable to the CAT. In essence, under the new Supplementary
Material, BX Regulation will make requests under these rules if and
only if the information is not otherwise available through the CAT.
The CAT NMS Plan states, however, that the elimination of rules
that are duplicative of the requirements of the CAT and the retirement
of the related systems should be effective at such time as CAT Data
meets minimum standards of accuracy and reliability.\34\ Accordingly,
as discussed in more detail below, BX believes that the EBS data may be
replaced by CAT Data at a date after all Industry Members are reporting
to the CAT when the proposed error rate thresholds have been met, and
BX has determined that its usage of the CAT Data has not revealed
material issues that have not been corrected, confirmed that the CAT
includes all data necessary to allow BX to continue to meet its
surveillance obligations, and confirmed that the Plan Processor is
sufficiently meeting all of its obligations under the CAT NMS Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ Id. [sic]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BX believes CAT Data should not be used in place of EBS data until
all Participants and Industry Members are reporting data to CAT. In
this way, BX will continue to have access to the necessary data to
perform its regulatory duties.
The CAT NMS Plan requires that a rule filing to eliminate a
duplicative rule address whether ``the availability of certain data
from Small Industry Members two years after the Effective Date would
facilitate a more expeditious retirement of duplicative systems.'' \35\
[[Page 25876]]
BX believes that the submission of data to the CAT by Small Industry
Members a year earlier than is required in the CAT NMS Plan, at the
same time as the other Industry Members, would expedite the replacement
of EBS data with CAT Data, as BX believes that the CAT would then have
all necessary data from the Industry Members for BX to perform the
regulatory surveillance that currently is performed via EBS. For this
reason, BX supports amending the CAT NMS Plan to require Small Industry
Members to report data to the CAT two years after the Effective Date
(instead of three), and intends to work with other Participants toward
that end.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CAT NMS Plan requires that this rule filing address ``whether
individual Industry Members can be exempted from reporting to
duplicative systems once their CAT reporting meets specified accuracy
and reliability standards, including, but not limited to, ways in which
establishing cross-system regulatory functionality or integrating data
from existing systems and the CAT would facilitate such Individual
Industry Member exemptions.'' \36\ BX believes that a single cut-over
from EBS to CAT is highly preferable to a firm-by-firm approach and is
not proposing to exempt members from the EBS requirements on a firm-by-
firm basis. BX believes that providing such individual exemptions to
Industry Members would be inefficient, more costly, and less reliable
than the single cut-over. Providing individual exemptions would require
the exchanges to create, for a brief temporary period, a cross-system
regulatory function and to integrate data from EBS and the CAT to avoid
creating any regulatory gaps as a result of such exemptions. Such a
function would be costly to create and would give rise to a greater
likelihood of data errors or other issues. Given the limited time in
which such exemptions would be necessary, BX does not believe that such
exemptions would be an appropriate use of limited resources. Moreover,
the primary benefit to a firm-by-firm exemptive approach would be to
reduce the amount of time an individual firm is required to comply with
EBS if it is also accurately and reliably reporting to the CAT. BX
believes that the overall accuracy and reliability thresholds for the
CAT described above would need to be met under any conditions before
firms could stop reporting to EBS, and as discussed above, by
accelerating Small Industry Members to report on the same timeframe as
all other Industry Members, there is no need to exempt members from EBS
requirements on a firm-by-firm basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CAT NMS Plan also requires that a rule filing to eliminate a
duplicative rule to provide ``specific accuracy and reliability
standards that will determine when duplicative systems will be retired,
including, but not limited to, whether the attainment of a certain
Error Rate should determine when a system duplicative of the CAT can be
retired.'' \37\ BX believes that it is critical that the CAT Data be
sufficiently accurate and reliable for BX to perform the regulatory
functions that it now performs via EBS. Accordingly, BX believes that
the CAT Data should meet specific quantitative error rates, as well as
certain qualitative requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BX believes that, before CAT Data may be used in place of EBS data,
the CAT would need to achieve a sustained error rate for a period of at
least 180 days of 5% or lower measured on a pre-correction or as-
submitted basis, and 2% or lower on a post-correction basis (measured
at T+5).\38\ BX proposes to measure the 5% pre-correction and 2% post-
correction thresholds by averaging the error rate across the period,
not require a 5% pre-correction and 2% post-correction maximum each day
for 180 consecutive days. BX believes that measuring each of the
thresholds over the course of 180 days will ensure that the CAT
consistently meets minimum accuracy and reliability thresholds while
also ensuring that single-day measurements do not unduly affect the
overall measurements. BX proposes to measure the appropriate error
rates in the aggregate, rather than firm-by-firm. The 2% and 5% error
rates are in line with the proposed retirement threshold for other
systems, such as OATS and COATS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ The Plan requires that the Plan Processor must ensure that
regulators have access to corrected and linked order and Customer
data by 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time on T+5. See CAT NMS Plan, at C-15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to these minimum error rates before using CAT Data
instead of EBS data, BX believes that during the minimum 180-day period
during which the thresholds are calculated, BX's use of the data in the
CAT must confirm that (i) usage over that time period has not revealed
material issues that have not been corrected, (ii) the CAT includes all
data necessary to allow BX to continue to meet its surveillance
obligations, and (iii) the Plan Processor is sufficiently meeting all
of its obligations under the CAT NMS Plan. BX believes this time period
to use the CAT Data is necessary to reveal any errors that may manifest
themselves only after surveillance patterns and other queries have been
run and to confirm that the Plan Processor is meeting its obligations
and performing its functions adequately.
Changes to COATS
The options exchanges utilize COATS to collect and review data
regarding options orders, quotes and transactions. The Participants
have provided COATS technical specifications to the Plan Processor for
the CAT for use in developing the Technical Specifications for the CAT,
and the Participants are working with the Plan Processor to include the
necessary COATS data elements in the CAT Technical Specifications.
Accordingly, although the Technical Specifications for the CAT have not
yet been finalized, BX and the other options exchanges propose to
eliminate COATS in accordance with the proposed timeline discussed
below.
BX adopted Chapter V, Section 7 to implement certain reporting
requirements related to COATS, and therefore proposes to eliminate the
information reporting requirements of that rule and replacing those
requirements with a requirement that members report information
pursuant to this rule as required by the Exchange's CAT compliance
rule, Chapter IX, Section 8.\39\ Among other things, Chapter V, Section
7 requires an Options Participant to ensure that each options order
received from a Customer for execution on BX Options is recorded and
time-stamped immediately, and also at the time of any modification or
cancellation of the order. The rule also specifies the information that
must be
[[Page 25877]]
contained at a minimum, including a unique order identification, the
underlying security, opening/closing designation, the identity of the
Clearing Participant, and the Options Participant identification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ COATS was developed to comply with an order of the
Commission requiring the then-options exchanges to ``design and
implement'' a consolidated audit trail to ``enable the options
exchanges to reconstruct markets promptly, effectively surveil them
and enforce order handling, firm quote, trade reporting and other
rules.'' See Section IV.B.e.(v) of the Commission's Order
Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Sections
19(h)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings and
Imposing Remedial Sanctions (the ``Order''). See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 43268 (September 11, 2000) and Administrative
Proceeding File No. 3-10282. As noted, the Plan is designed to
create, implement and maintain a CAT that would capture customer and
order event information for orders in NMS Securities and OTC Equity
Securities, across all markets, from the time of order inception
through routing, cancellation, modification, or execution in a
single consolidated data source. BX has already adopted rules to
enforce compliance by its Industry Members, as applicable, with the
provisions of the Plan. Once the CAT is fully operational, it will
be appropriate to delete BX's rules implemented to comply with the
Order as duplicative of the CAT. Accordingly, BX believes that it
would continue to be in compliance with the requirements of the
Order once the CAT is fully operational and the COATS rules are
deleted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CAT NMS Plan states that the elimination of rules that are
duplicative of the requirements of the CAT and the retirement of the
related systems should be effective at such time as CAT Data meets
minimum standards of accuracy and reliability.\40\ As discussed in more
detail below, BX and the other options exchanges believe that COATS may
be retired at a date after all Industry Members are reporting to the
CAT when the proposed error rate thresholds have been met, and BX has
determined that its usage of the CAT Data has not revealed material
issues that have not been corrected, confirmed that the CAT includes
all data necessary to allow BX to continue to meet its surveillance
obligations, and confirmed that the Plan Processor is sufficiently
meeting all of its obligations under the CAT NMS Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ Id. [sic]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BX believes COATS should not be retired until all Participants and
Industry Members that report data to COATS are reporting comparable
data to the CAT. In this way, BX will continue to have access to the
necessary data to perform its regulatory duties.
The CAT NMS Plan requires that a rule filing to eliminate a
duplicative rule address whether ``the availability of certain data
from Small Industry Members two years after the Effective Date would
facilitate a more expeditious retirement of duplicative systems.'' \41\
The Exchange believes COATS should not be retired until all
Participants and Industry Members that report data to COATS are
reporting comparable data to the CAT. While the early submission of
options data to the CAT by Small Industry Members could expedite the
retirement of COATS, the Exchange believes that it premature to
consider such a change and that additional analysis would be necessary
to determine whether such early reporting by Small Industry Members
would be feasible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CAT NMS Plan requires that this rule filing address ``whether
individual Industry Members can be exempted from reporting to
duplicative systems once their CAT reporting meets specified accuracy
and reliability standards, including, but not limited to, ways in which
establishing cross-system regulatory functionality or integrating data
from existing systems and the CAT would facilitate such Individual
Industry Member exemptions.'' \42\ BX believes that a single cut-over
from COATS to CAT is highly preferable to a firm-by-firm approach and
is not proposing to exempt members from the COATS requirements on a
firm-by-firm basis. BX and the other options exchanges believe that
providing such individual exemptions to Industry Members would be
inefficient, more costly, and less reliable than the single cut-over.
Providing individual exemptions would require the options exchanges to
create, for a brief temporary period, a cross-system regulatory
function and to integrate data from COATS and the CAT to avoid creating
any regulatory gaps as a result of such exemptions. Such a function
would be costly to create and would give rise to a greater likelihood
of data errors or other issues. Given the limited time in which such
exemptions would be necessary, BX and the other options exchanges do
not believe that such exemptions would be an appropriate use of limited
resources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CAT NMS Plan also requires that a rule filing to eliminate a
duplicative rule to provide ``specific accuracy and reliability
standards that will determine when duplicative systems will be retired,
including, but not limited to, whether the attainment of a certain
Error Rate should determine when a system duplicative of the CAT can be
retired.'' \43\ BX believes that it is critical that the CAT Data be
sufficiently accurate and reliable for the Exchange to perform the
regulatory functions that it now performs via COATS. Accordingly, BX
believes that the CAT Data should meet specific quantitative error
rates, as well as certain qualitative requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BX and the other options exchanges believe that, before COATS may
be retired, the CAT would need to achieve a sustained error rate for a
period of at least 180 days of 5% or lower measured on a pre-correction
or as-submitted basis, and 2% or lower on a post-correction basis
(measured at T+5).\44\ BX proposes to measure the 5% pre-correction and
2% post-correction thresholds by averaging the error rate across the
period, not require a 5% pre-correction and 2% post-correction maximum
each day for 180 consecutive days. BX believes that measuring each of
the thresholds over the course of 180 days will ensure that the CAT
consistently meets minimum accuracy and reliability thresholds while
also ensuring that single-day measurements do not unduly affect the
overall measurements. BX proposes to measure the appropriate error
rates in the aggregate, rather than firm-by-firm. In addition, BX
proposes to measure the error rates for options only, not equity
securities, as only options are subject to COATS. The 2% and 5% error
rates are in line with the proposed retirement threshold for OATS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ The Plan requires that the Plan Processor must ensure that
regulators have access to corrected and linked order and Customer
data by 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time on T+5. See CAT NMS Plan, at C-15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to these minimum error rates before COATS can be
retired, BX believes that during the minimum 180-day period during
which the thresholds are calculated, BX's use of the data in the CAT
must confirm that (i) usage over that time period has not revealed
material issues that have not been corrected, (ii) the CAT includes all
data necessary to allow BX to continue to meet its surveillance
obligations, and (iii) the Plan Processor is sufficiently meeting all
of its obligations under the CAT NMS Plan. BX believes this time period
to use the CAT Data is necessary to reveal any errors that may manifest
themselves only after surveillance patterns and other queries have been
run and to confirm that the Plan Processor is meeting its obligations
and performing its functions adequately.
If the Commission approves the proposed rule change, BX will
announce the implementation date of the proposed rule change in a
Regulatory Notice that will be published once BX concludes the
thresholds for accuracy and reliability described above have been met
and that the Plan Processor is sufficiently meeting all of its
obligations under the CAT NMS Plan.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\45\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\46\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\46\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BX believes that the proposed rule change fulfills the obligation
in the CAT NMS Plan for BX to submit a proposed rule change to
eliminate or modify duplicative rules. In approving the Plan, the SEC
noted that the Plan ``is necessary and appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors and the maintenance of fair
and orderly
[[Page 25878]]
markets, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a
national market system, or is otherwise in furtherance of the purposes
of the Act.'' \47\ As this proposal implements the Plan, BX believes
that this proposal furthers the objectives of the Plan, as identified
by the SEC, and is therefore consistent with the Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ Approval Order at 84697.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, the purpose of the proposed rule change is to eliminate
rules that require the submission of duplicative data to the exchange.
The elimination of such duplicative requirements will reduce
unnecessary costs and other compliance burdens for BX and its members,
and therefore, will enhance the efficiency of the securities markets.
Furthermore, BX believes that the approach set forth in the proposed
rule change strikes the appropriate balance between ensuring that BX is
able to continue to fulfill its statutory obligation to protect
investors and the public interest by ensuring its surveillance of
market activity remains accurate and effective while also establishing
a reasonable timeframe for elimination or modification of its rules
that will be rendered duplicative after implementation of the CAT.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
Section 6(b)(8) of the Exchange Act \48\ requires that the
Exchange's rules not impose any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate. BX does not believe that the proposed rule
change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary
or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. BX
notes that the proposed rule change implements the requirements of the
CAT NMS Plan approved by the Commission regarding the elimination of
rules and systems that are duplicative the CAT, and is designed to
assist BX in meeting its regulatory obligations pursuant to the Plan.
Similarly, all exchanges and FINRA are proposing the elimination of
their rules related to OATS, EBS and COATS to implement the
requirements of the CAT NMS Plan. Therefore, this is not a competitive
rule filing and, therefore, it does not raise competition issues
between and among the self-regulatory organizations and/or their
members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Although written comments on the proposed rule change were not
solicited, two commenters, the Financial Information Forum (``FIF'')
and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
(``SIFMA''), submitted letters to the Participants regarding the
retirement of systems related to the CAT.\49\ In its comment letter,
with regard to the retirement of duplicative systems more generally,
FIF recommends that the Participants continue the effort to incorporate
current reporting obligations into the CAT in order to replace existing
reportable systems with the CAT. In addition, FIF further recommends
that, once a CAT Reporter achieves satisfactory reporting data quality,
the CAT Reporter should be exempt from reporting to any duplicative
reporting systems. FIF believes that these recommendations ``would
serve both an underlying regulatory objective of more immediate and
accurate access to data as well as an industry objective of reduced
costs and burdens of regulatory oversight.'' \50\ In its comments about
EBS specifically, FIF states that the retirement of the EBS
requirements should be a high priority, and that the CAT should be
designed to include the requisite data elements to permit the rapid
retirement of the EBS system.\51\ Similarly, SIFMA states that ``the
establishment of the CAT must be accompanied by the prompt elimination
of duplicative systems,'' and ``recommend[ed] that the initial
technical specifications be designed to facilitate the immediate
retirement of . . . duplicative reporting systems.'' \52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ Letter from William H. Hebert, FIF, to Participants re:
Milestone for Participants' rule change filings to eliminate/modify
duplicative rules, dated April 12, 2017 (``FIF Letter''); Letter
from Kenneth E. Bentsen, Jr., SIFMA, to Participants re: Selection
of Thesys as CAT Processor, dated April 4, 2017 (``SIFMA Letter''),
at 2.
\50\ FIF Letter at 2.
\51\ Id.
\52\ SIFMA Letter at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed above, BX agrees with the commenters that the OATS,
EBS and COATS reporting requirements should be replaced by the CAT
reporting requirements as soon as accurate and reliable CAT Data is
available. To this end, BX anticipates that the CAT will be designed to
collect the data necessary to permit the retirement of OATS, EBS and
COATS. As discussed above, BX disagrees with the recommendation to
provide individual exemptions to those CAT Reporters who obtain
satisfactory data reporting quality; however, BX supports amendments to
the CAT NMS Plan that would accelerate reporting for Small Industry
Members that are currently reporting to OATS to facilitate the
retirement of that system.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BX-2017-027 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2017-027. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
[[Page 25879]]
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2017-027, and should be
submitted on or before June 26, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\53\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-11508 Filed 6-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P