Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof Institution of Investigation, 25333-25334 [2017-11307]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Notices
Hearings on injury and remedy.—The
Commission has scheduled separate
hearings in connection with the injury
and remedy phases of this investigation.
The hearing on injury will be held
beginning at 9:30 a.m. on August 15,
2017, at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC. In the event that the
Commission makes an affirmative injury
determination or is equally divided on
the question of injury in this
investigation, a hearing on the question
of remedy will be held beginning at 9:30
a.m. on October 3, 2017. Requests to
appear at the hearings should be filed in
writing with the Secretary to the
Commission on or before August 9, 2017
for the injury hearing, and September
27, 2017 for the remedy hearing. A
nonparty who has testimony that may
aid the Commission’s deliberations may
request permission to present a short
statement at the hearings. All parties
and nonparties desiring to appear at the
hearings and make oral presentations
should participate in prehearing
conferences to be held on August 11,
2017 for the injury hearing and
September 28, 2017 for the remedy
hearing, if deemed necessary. Oral
testimony and written materials to be
submitted at the public hearings are
governed by sections 201.6(b)(2)
201.13(f), and 206.5 of the
Commission’s rules. Parties must submit
any request to present a portion of their
hearing testimony in camera no later
than 7 business days prior to the date of
the respective hearings.
Written submissions.—Each party
who is an interested party may submit
a prehearing brief to the Commission.
Prehearing briefs must conform with the
provisions of sections 201.8, 206.7, and
206.8 of the Commission’s rules. The
deadline for filing prehearing briefs on
injury is August 8, 2017; that for filing
prehearing briefs on remedy, including
any commitments pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
2252(a)(6)(B), is September 27, 2017.
Parties may also file written testimony
in connection with their presentation at
the hearing, as provided in sections
201.13, 206.5, and 206.8 of the
Commission’s rules, and posthearing
briefs, which must conform with the
provisions of sections 201.8, 201.13,
206.7, and 206.8 of Commission’s rules.
The deadline for filing posthearing
briefs for the injury phase of the
investigation is August 22, 2017; the
deadline for filing posthearing briefs for
the remedy phase of the investigation, if
any, is October 10, 2017. In addition,
any person who has not entered an
appearance as a party to the
investigation may submit a written
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 May 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
statement of information pertinent to
the consideration of injury on or before
August 22, 2017, and pertinent to the
consideration of remedy on or before
October 10, 2017. All written
submissions must conform with the
provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s rules; any submissions
that contain CBI must also conform with
the requirements of sections 201.6 and
206.17 of the Commission’s rules. The
Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing,
available on the Commission’s Web site
at https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/
documents/handbook_on_filing_
procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the
Commission’s rules with respect to
electronic filing.
Any additional written submission to
the Commission, including requests
pursuant to section 201.12 of the
Commission’s rules, will not be
accepted unless good cause is shown for
accepting such a submission, or unless
the submission is pursuant to a specific
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with section 201.16(c)
of the Commission’s rules, each
document filed by a party to the
investigation must be served on all other
parties to the investigation (as identified
by the service list), and a certificate of
service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for
filing without a certificate of service.
Authority: This investigation is being
conducted under authority of Section 202 of
the Act; this notice is published pursuant to
section 203(b)(3) of the Act.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 23, 2017.
Katherine M. Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2017–11013 Filed 5–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1058]
Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and
Components Thereof Institution of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
April 28, 2017, under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Sony Corporation of Japan;
Sony Storage Media Solutions
Corporation of Japan; Sony Storage
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25333
Media Manufacturing Corporation of
Japan; Sony DADC US Inc. of Terre
Haute, Indiana; and Sony Latin America
Inc. of Miami, Florida. Supplements to
the Complaint were filed on May 2,
2017 and May 19, 2017. The complaint,
as supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain magnetic tape cartridges and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 6,674,596 (‘‘the ’596 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 6,979,501 (‘‘the ’501
patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 7,029,774
(‘‘the ’774 patent’’). The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
May 25, 2017, Ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
25334
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Notices
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain magnetic tape
cartridges and components thereof by
reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1–19 of the ’596 patent; claims
1–6 and 8 of the ’501 patent; and claims
1–11 and 15–20 of the ’774 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Sony Corporation, 1–7–1 Konan,
Minato-ku, Tokyo 108–0075, Japan.
Sony Storage Media Solutions
Corporation, 1–7–1 Konan, Minato-ku,
Tokyo 108–0075, Japan.
Sony Storage Media Manufacturing
Corporation, 3–4–1 Sakuragi, Tagajo,
Miyagi 985–0842, Japan.
Sony DADC US Inc., 1800 North
Fruitridge Avenue, Terre Haute, IN
47804.
Sony Latin America Inc., 5201 Blue
Lagoon Drive, Suite 400, Miami, FL
33126.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, 7–3
Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo
107–0052, Japan.
Fujifilm Corporation, 7–3 Akasaka 9chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107–0052,
Japan.
Fujifilm Media Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd., 12–1 Ogimachi 2-chome, Odawara,
Kanagawa 250–0001, Japan.
Fujifilm Holdings America
Corporation, 200 Summit Lake Drive,
Valhalla, NY 10595.
Fujifilm Recording Media U.S.A., Inc.,
45 Crosby Drive, Bedford, MA 01730–
1401.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 26, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–11307 Filed 5–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–392]
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled
Substances Registration
ACTION:
Registrants listed below have
applied for and been granted
registration by the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) as bulk
manufacturers of various classes of
controlled substances.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
companies listed below applied to be
registered as manufacturers of various
basic classes of controlled substances.
Information on previously published
notices is listed in the table below. No
comments or objections were submitted
for these notices.
SUMMARY:
Company
FR docket
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Cody Laboratories, Inc ...................................................................................................................................
Alcami Wisconsin Corporation .......................................................................................................................
Johnson Matthey, Inc .....................................................................................................................................
Noramco, Inc ..................................................................................................................................................
Organix, Inc ....................................................................................................................................................
Mallinckrodt, LLC ...........................................................................................................................................
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc ............................................................................................................
The DEA has considered the factors in
21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that
the registration of these registrants to
manufacture the applicable basic classes
of controlled substances is consistent
with the public interest and with United
States obligations under international
treaties, conventions, or protocols in
effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:19 May 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
investigated each of the company’s
maintenance of effective controls
against diversion by inspecting and
testing each company’s physical
security systems, verifying each
company’s compliance with state and
local laws, and reviewing each
company’s background and history.
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Notice of registration.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
81
81
81
82
82
82
82
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
61249
63219
71767
6645
8433
13136
13506
Published
September 6, 2016.
September 14, 2016.
October 18, 2016.
January 19, 2017.
January 25, 2017.
March 9, 2017.
March 13, 2017.
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR
1301.33, the DEA has granted a
registration as a bulk manufacturer to
the above listed companies.
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 104 (Thursday, June 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25333-25334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11307]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1058]
Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof
Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on April 28, 2017, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Sony
Corporation of Japan; Sony Storage Media Solutions Corporation of
Japan; Sony Storage Media Manufacturing Corporation of Japan; Sony DADC
US Inc. of Terre Haute, Indiana; and Sony Latin America Inc. of Miami,
Florida. Supplements to the Complaint were filed on May 2, 2017 and May
19, 2017. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain magnetic tape cartridges and components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,674,596 (``the '596
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,979,501 (``the '501 patent''); and U.S.
Patent No. 7,029,774 (``the '774 patent''). The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on May 25, 2017, Ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a
[[Page 25334]]
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation
into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of certain magnetic tape cartridges
and components thereof by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1-19 of the '596 patent; claims 1-6 and 8 of the '501 patent;
and claims 1-11 and 15-20 of the '774 patent, and whether an industry
in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1),
(f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
Sony Corporation, 1-7-1 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0075, Japan.
Sony Storage Media Solutions Corporation, 1-7-1 Konan, Minato-ku,
Tokyo 108-0075, Japan.
Sony Storage Media Manufacturing Corporation, 3-4-1 Sakuragi,
Tagajo, Miyagi 985-0842, Japan.
Sony DADC US Inc., 1800 North Fruitridge Avenue, Terre Haute, IN
47804.
Sony Latin America Inc., 5201 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 400, Miami,
FL 33126.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, 7-3 Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku,
Tokyo 107-0052, Japan.
Fujifilm Corporation, 7-3 Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-
0052, Japan.
Fujifilm Media Manufacturing Co., Ltd., 12-1 Ogimachi 2-chome,
Odawara, Kanagawa 250-0001, Japan.
Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation, 200 Summit Lake Drive,
Valhalla, NY 10595.
Fujifilm Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., 45 Crosby Drive, Bedford, MA
01730-1401.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 26, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-11307 Filed 5-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P