Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Supplementary Material .03 to Rule 713, 25433-25435 [2017-11253]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Notices
proposing the elimination of reporting
requirements related to COATS and
EBS, as well as other duplicative rules,
to implement the requirements of the
CAT NMS Plan. Therefore, this is not a
competitive rule filing and, therefore, it
does not raise competition issues
between and among the self-regulatory
organizations and/or their members.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Although written comments on the
proposed rule change were not solicited,
the Exchange received comments from
two commenters, the Financial
Information Forum (‘‘FIF’’) and the
Securities Industry and Financial
Markets Association (‘‘SIFMA’’),
regarding the retirement of systems
related to the CAT.28 In its comment
letters, with regard to the retirement of
duplicative systems more generally, FIF
recommended that the Participants
continue the effort to incorporate
current reporting obligations into the
CAT in order to replace existing
reportable systems with the CAT. In
addition, FIF further recommended that,
once a CAT Reporter achieved
satisfactory reporting data quality, the
CAT Reporter should be exempt from
reporting to any duplicative reporting
systems. FIF believed that these
recommendations ‘‘would serve both an
underlying regulatory objective of more
immediate and accurate access to data
as well as an industry objective of
reduced costs and burdens of regulatory
oversight.’’ 29 In its comments about
EBS specifically, FIF stated that the
retirement of the EBS requirements
should be a high priority, and that the
CAT should be designed to include the
requisite data elements to permit the
rapid retirement of EBS.30 Similarly,
SIFMA stated that ‘‘the establishment of
the CAT must be accompanied by the
prompt elimination of duplicative
systems,’’ and ‘‘recommend[ed] that the
initial technical specifications be
designed to facilitate the immediate
retirement of . . . duplicative reporting
systems.’’ 31
28 Letter from William H. Hebert, FIF, to
Participants re: Milestone for Participants’ rule
change filings to eliminate/modify duplicative rules
(Apr. 12, 2017) (‘‘FIF Letter’’); Letter from William
H. Hebert, FIF, to Brent J. Fields, SEC re: Milestone
for Participants’ rule change filings to eliminate/
modify duplicative rules (Apr. 12, 2017); and Letter
from Kenneth E. Bentsen, Jr., SIFMA, to
Participants re: Selection of Thesys as CAT
Processor (Apr. 4, 2017) (‘‘SIFMA Letter’’) at 2.
29 FIF Letter at 2.
30 FIF Letter at 2.
31 SIFMA Letter at 2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 May 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
As discussed above, the Exchange
agrees with the commenters that the
reporting requirements proposed to be
modified or eliminated should be
replaced by the CAT reporting
requirements as soon as accurate and
reliable CAT Data is available. To this
end, the Exchange anticipates that the
CAT will be designed to collect the data
necessary to permit the modification or
elimination, as applicable, of these
reporting requirements and the
retirement of related systems. However,
as discussed above, the Exchange
disagrees with the recommendation to
provide individual exemptions to those
CAT Reporters who obtain satisfactory
data reporting quality.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the Exchange consents, the Commission
will:
A. By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
B. Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2017–041 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2017–041. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
PO 00000
Frm 00210
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25433
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2017–041 and should be submitted on
or before June 22, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.32
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–11373 Filed 5–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–80771; File No. SR–MRX–
2017–05]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend
Supplementary Material .03 to Rule 713
May 25, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 19,
2017, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
32 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
25434
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Notices
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Supplementary Material .03 to Rule 713
to change the allocation entitlement for
Preferred PMMs.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at www.ise.com, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Supplementary Material .03 to Rule
713 allows an Electronic Access
Member (‘‘EAM’’) to designate a
‘‘Preferred Market Maker’’ on orders it
enters into the System (‘‘Preferenced
Orders’’). A Preferred Market Maker
may be the Primary Market Maker
(‘‘PMM’’) appointed to the options class
or any Competitive Market Maker
(‘‘CMM’’) appointed to the options
class.3 The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend Supplementary
Material .03 to Rule 713 to change the
allocation entitlement for PMMs that
receive Preferenced Orders (i.e.,
‘‘Preferred PMMs’’), consistent with
allocation entitlements for PMM
equivalents on other options exchanges.
Currently, a Preferred Market Maker
that is quoting at the national best bid
of offer (‘‘NBBO’’) at the time the
Preferenced Order is received,4 is
entitled to participation rights equal to
the greater of: (i) The proportion of the
total size at the best price represented
by the size of its quote, or (ii) sixty
3 See
Supplementary Material .03(a) to Rule 713.
the Preferred Market Maker is not quoting at
a price equal to the NBBO at the time the
Preferenced Order is received, the Exchange’s
regular allocation procedure applies to the
execution of the Preferenced Order. See
Supplementary Material .03(b) to Rule 713.
4 If
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 May 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
percent (60%) of the contracts to be
allocated if there is only one (1) other
Professional Order or market maker
quotation at the best price and forty
percent (40%) if there are two (2) or
more other Professional Orders and/or
market maker quotes at the best price.5
This allocation entitlement is in lieu of
the regular allocation provided in
Supplementary Material .01 to Rule 713,
and applies regardless of whether the
Preferred Market Maker is a PMM or
CMM. In some instances where the
Preferred Market Maker is the PMM
appointed to the options class this
results in a preferenced allocation that
is worse than the market maker’s regular
allocation entitlement. Specifically,
Supplementary Material .01(c) to Rule
713 provides a small order entitlement
whereby orders of five contracts or
fewer are executed first by the PMM. A
PMM that normally receives an
allocation entitlement for orders of five
contracts or fewer,6 would not receive
this allocation entitlement if it were
designated as the Preferred Market
Maker.
The Exchange now proposes to amend
the participation rights of Preferred
PMMs such that the PMM appointed in
an option class will receive
participation rights that are consistent
with the higher allocation entitlement
given to PMM equivalents on the MIAX
Options Exchange (‘‘MIAX’’), and with
the allocation entitlement recently
adopted on the Exchange’s affiliates,
Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’) and Nasdaq
GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’). In particular,
the Exchange proposes to amend
Supplementary Material .03(c) to Rule
713 to provide that, the Preferred
Market Maker has participation rights
equal to the greater of: (i) The
proportion of the total size at the best
price represented by the size of its
quote, (ii) sixty percent (60%) of the
contracts to be allocated if there is only
one (1) other Professional Order or
market maker quotation at the best price
and forty percent (40%) if there are two
(2) or more other Professional Orders
and/or market maker quotes at the best
price, or (iii) the full size of a
Preferenced Order for five (5) contracts
or fewer if the Primary Market Maker
appointed to the options class is
designated as the Preferred Market
Maker—i.e., the small order allocation
entitlement contained in Supplementary
Material .01(c) to Rule 713. Thus, the
PMM appointed to an options class
would receive an allocation entitlement
for orders of five contracts or fewer,
regardless of whether that order is
5 See
6 See
PO 00000
Supplementary Material .03(c) to Rule 713.
Supplementary Material .01(c) to Rule 713.
Frm 00211
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
submitted as a Preferenced Order. The
Exchange believes that this is
appropriate since the PMMs obligations
to the market are the same regardless of
whether an order happens to be
submitted with a preference instruction.
PMM equivalents on other options
exchanges currently receive this
participation right when preferenced, in
addition to the regular 60% or 40%
preferenced allocation currently
provided in the rule.7 Preferred CMMs
will continue to receive the same
allocation entitlement that they receive
today.
Pursuant to Supplementary Material
.01(c) to Rule 713 the Exchange
evaluates on a quarterly basis what
percentage of the volume executed on
the Exchange is comprised of orders for
five (5) contracts or fewer executed by
PMMs. The Exchange represents that
this review will extend to the small
order entitlement for Preferred PMMs.
Thus, consistent with Supplementary
Material .01(c) to Rule 713, the
Exchange will reduce the size of the
orders included in the small order
entitlement if such percentage is over
forty percent (40%).
Implementation
The proposed rule change will be
implemented on the Exchange’s new
INET trading system, which is
scheduled to launch in Q3 2017,8
provided that the Exchange will provide
notice of this change in a circular to be
distributed to members prior to
implementing the new allocation
entitlement on INET. The INET
migration will take place on a symbol by
symbol basis as specified by the
Exchange in a notice to be provided to
Members. The Exchange is proposing to
implement this rule change on the INET
platform as the symbols migrate to that
platform. As such, PMMs will begin
receiving the small order entitlement in
symbols as they migrate to the INET
platform.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.9
In particular, the proposal is consistent
7 See MIAX Rule 514(g), (i). See also Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 80239 (March 14, 2017),
82 FR 14413 (March 20, 2017) (SR–ISEGemini–
2017–14); 80438 (April 12, 2017), 82 FR 18329
(April 18, 2017) (SR–ISE–2017–31).
8 See SR–MRX–2017–02 (pending publication).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,10
because it is designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade,
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the protection of investors and the
public interest as it will allow EAMs to
send Preferenced Orders to the PMM
appointed in an options class without
inadvertently disadvantaging the PMM
compared to if the order was not
preferenced. The regular allocation
entitlements for PMMs, including the
small order entitlement, are designed to
balance the obligations that the PMM
has to the market with corresponding
benefits. The Exchange believes that it
is appropriate to provide the small order
entitlement also when the PMM is
designated as a Preferred Market Maker
as the obligations that the PMM has to
the market are not diminished when it
receives a Preferenced Order. Other
options exchanges similarly provide the
small order entitlement to the PMM
regardless of whether the order is
submitted as a Preferenced Order.11 At
the same time, the proposed rule change
does not amend the current
participation rights for Preferred CMMs,
which is also consistent with allocation
rules of other options exchanges. While
the Exchange believes that it is
appropriate to grant PMMs an allocation
entitlement for small sized orders
preferenced to them in recognition of
the obligations that PMMs have to
maintain fair and orderly markets, the
Exchange does not believe that it is
appropriate at this time to extend this
entitlement to CMMs, preferenced or
otherwise.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,12 the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket or
intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is designed to
allow EAMs to send Preferenced Orders
to the PMM appointed in an options
class without inadvertently
disadvantaging the PMM by reducing its
participation rights. The proposed
allocation entitlements are equivalent to
those currently in effect on other
10 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
supra note 7.
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
11 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 May 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
options exchanges.13 The proposed rule
change is therefore not designed to
impose any significant burden on
competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 14 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.15
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MRX–2017–05 on the subject line.
supra note 7.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MRX–2017–05. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–MRX–
2017–05 and should be submitted on or
before June 22, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–11253 Filed 5–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
13 See
14 15
PO 00000
Frm 00212
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
25435
16 17
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
01JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 104 (Thursday, June 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25433-25435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11253]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-80771; File No. SR-MRX-2017-05]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Supplementary Material .03 to Rule 713
May 25, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 19, 2017, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 25434]]
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Supplementary Material .03 to Rule
713 to change the allocation entitlement for Preferred PMMs.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Supplementary Material .03 to Rule 713 allows an Electronic Access
Member (``EAM'') to designate a ``Preferred Market Maker'' on orders it
enters into the System (``Preferenced Orders''). A Preferred Market
Maker may be the Primary Market Maker (``PMM'') appointed to the
options class or any Competitive Market Maker (``CMM'') appointed to
the options class.\3\ The purpose of the proposed rule change is to
amend Supplementary Material .03 to Rule 713 to change the allocation
entitlement for PMMs that receive Preferenced Orders (i.e., ``Preferred
PMMs''), consistent with allocation entitlements for PMM equivalents on
other options exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Supplementary Material .03(a) to Rule 713.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, a Preferred Market Maker that is quoting at the national
best bid of offer (``NBBO'') at the time the Preferenced Order is
received,\4\ is entitled to participation rights equal to the greater
of: (i) The proportion of the total size at the best price represented
by the size of its quote, or (ii) sixty percent (60%) of the contracts
to be allocated if there is only one (1) other Professional Order or
market maker quotation at the best price and forty percent (40%) if
there are two (2) or more other Professional Orders and/or market maker
quotes at the best price.\5\ This allocation entitlement is in lieu of
the regular allocation provided in Supplementary Material .01 to Rule
713, and applies regardless of whether the Preferred Market Maker is a
PMM or CMM. In some instances where the Preferred Market Maker is the
PMM appointed to the options class this results in a preferenced
allocation that is worse than the market maker's regular allocation
entitlement. Specifically, Supplementary Material .01(c) to Rule 713
provides a small order entitlement whereby orders of five contracts or
fewer are executed first by the PMM. A PMM that normally receives an
allocation entitlement for orders of five contracts or fewer,\6\ would
not receive this allocation entitlement if it were designated as the
Preferred Market Maker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ If the Preferred Market Maker is not quoting at a price
equal to the NBBO at the time the Preferenced Order is received, the
Exchange's regular allocation procedure applies to the execution of
the Preferenced Order. See Supplementary Material .03(b) to Rule
713.
\5\ See Supplementary Material .03(c) to Rule 713.
\6\ See Supplementary Material .01(c) to Rule 713.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to amend the participation rights of
Preferred PMMs such that the PMM appointed in an option class will
receive participation rights that are consistent with the higher
allocation entitlement given to PMM equivalents on the MIAX Options
Exchange (``MIAX''), and with the allocation entitlement recently
adopted on the Exchange's affiliates, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'') and
Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX''). In particular, the Exchange proposes to
amend Supplementary Material .03(c) to Rule 713 to provide that, the
Preferred Market Maker has participation rights equal to the greater
of: (i) The proportion of the total size at the best price represented
by the size of its quote, (ii) sixty percent (60%) of the contracts to
be allocated if there is only one (1) other Professional Order or
market maker quotation at the best price and forty percent (40%) if
there are two (2) or more other Professional Orders and/or market maker
quotes at the best price, or (iii) the full size of a Preferenced Order
for five (5) contracts or fewer if the Primary Market Maker appointed
to the options class is designated as the Preferred Market Maker--i.e.,
the small order allocation entitlement contained in Supplementary
Material .01(c) to Rule 713. Thus, the PMM appointed to an options
class would receive an allocation entitlement for orders of five
contracts or fewer, regardless of whether that order is submitted as a
Preferenced Order. The Exchange believes that this is appropriate since
the PMMs obligations to the market are the same regardless of whether
an order happens to be submitted with a preference instruction. PMM
equivalents on other options exchanges currently receive this
participation right when preferenced, in addition to the regular 60% or
40% preferenced allocation currently provided in the rule.\7\ Preferred
CMMs will continue to receive the same allocation entitlement that they
receive today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See MIAX Rule 514(g), (i). See also Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 80239 (March 14, 2017), 82 FR 14413 (March 20, 2017)
(SR-ISEGemini-2017-14); 80438 (April 12, 2017), 82 FR 18329 (April
18, 2017) (SR-ISE-2017-31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Supplementary Material .01(c) to Rule 713 the Exchange
evaluates on a quarterly basis what percentage of the volume executed
on the Exchange is comprised of orders for five (5) contracts or fewer
executed by PMMs. The Exchange represents that this review will extend
to the small order entitlement for Preferred PMMs. Thus, consistent
with Supplementary Material .01(c) to Rule 713, the Exchange will
reduce the size of the orders included in the small order entitlement
if such percentage is over forty percent (40%).
Implementation
The proposed rule change will be implemented on the Exchange's new
INET trading system, which is scheduled to launch in Q3 2017,\8\
provided that the Exchange will provide notice of this change in a
circular to be distributed to members prior to implementing the new
allocation entitlement on INET. The INET migration will take place on a
symbol by symbol basis as specified by the Exchange in a notice to be
provided to Members. The Exchange is proposing to implement this rule
change on the INET platform as the symbols migrate to that platform. As
such, PMMs will begin receiving the small order entitlement in symbols
as they migrate to the INET platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See SR-MRX-2017-02 (pending publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ In
particular, the proposal is consistent
[[Page 25435]]
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ because it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest as it will
allow EAMs to send Preferenced Orders to the PMM appointed in an
options class without inadvertently disadvantaging the PMM compared to
if the order was not preferenced. The regular allocation entitlements
for PMMs, including the small order entitlement, are designed to
balance the obligations that the PMM has to the market with
corresponding benefits. The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to
provide the small order entitlement also when the PMM is designated as
a Preferred Market Maker as the obligations that the PMM has to the
market are not diminished when it receives a Preferenced Order. Other
options exchanges similarly provide the small order entitlement to the
PMM regardless of whether the order is submitted as a Preferenced
Order.\11\ At the same time, the proposed rule change does not amend
the current participation rights for Preferred CMMs, which is also
consistent with allocation rules of other options exchanges. While the
Exchange believes that it is appropriate to grant PMMs an allocation
entitlement for small sized orders preferenced to them in recognition
of the obligations that PMMs have to maintain fair and orderly markets,
the Exchange does not believe that it is appropriate at this time to
extend this entitlement to CMMs, preferenced or otherwise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\12\ the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden
on intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed
rule change is designed to allow EAMs to send Preferenced Orders to the
PMM appointed in an options class without inadvertently disadvantaging
the PMM by reducing its participation rights. The proposed allocation
entitlements are equivalent to those currently in effect on other
options exchanges.\13\ The proposed rule change is therefore not
designed to impose any significant burden on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
\13\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \14\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-MRX-2017-05 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2017-05. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2017-05 and should be
submitted on or before June 22, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-11253 Filed 5-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P