Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 22805-22807 [2017-10058]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
22805
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 95 / Thursday, May 18, 2017 / Notices
Time will be set aside at the end of
the briefing so that members of the
public may address the Committee after
the formal presentations have been
completed. Persons interested in the
issue are also invited to submit written
comments; the comments must be
received in the regional office by Friday,
July 14, 2017. Written comments may be
mailed to the Eastern Regional Office,
U.S. Commissionon Civil Rights, 1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150,
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202)
376–7548, or emailed to Evelyn Bohor at
ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire
additional information may contact the
Eastern Regional Office at (202) 376–
7533.
Records and documents discussed
during the meeting will be available for
public viewing as they become available
at https://database.faca.gov/committee/
meetings.aspx?cid=252 and clicking on
the ‘‘Meeting Details’’ and ‘‘Documents’’
links. Records generated from this
meeting may also be inspected and
reproduced at the Eastern Regional
Office, as they become available, both
before and after the meeting. Persons
interested in the work of this advisory
committee are advised to go to the
Commission’s Web site, www.usccr.gov,
or to contact the Eastern Regional Office
at the above phone number, email or
street address.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
Tentative Agenda
Notice of Petitions by Firms for
Determination of Eligibility To Apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance
Wednesday, June 14, 2017
AGENCY:
Economic Development
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice and opportunity for
public comment.
I. Welcome and Introductions 9:00 a.m.
II. Briefing 9:15 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Panel One: Family of the Mentally Ill and
Mental Health Advocates
Panel Two: Law Enforcement
Panel Three: Critical Decisions
Panel Four: Legislature Issues
III. Open Session—conclusion of panels
IV. Adjournment
Pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade
Act 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341
et seq.), the Economic Development
Administration (EDA) has received
petitions for certification of eligibility to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
from the firms listed below.
Accordingly, EDA has initiated
investigations to determine whether
increased imports into the United States
of articles like or directly competitive
with those produced by each of these
firms contributed importantly to the
total or partial separation of the firm’s
workers, or threat thereof, and to a
decrease in sales or production of each
petitioning firm.
Dated: May 12, 2017.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2017–10029 Filed 5–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE
[4/26/2017 through 5/5/2017]
Date accepted
for investigation
Firm name
Firm address
SeaTac Packaging Manufacturing Corporation.
Precision Connecting Rod Service, Inc.
d/b/a PCR Machining, Inc.
901 North Levee Road, Puyallup, WA
98371.
2600 W. Cermak Road, Broadview, IL
60155.
Preferred Lightning Protection, Inc ........
2100 East 1st. Street, Maryville, MO
64468.
5110 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, WI
53209.
Stainless Foundry & Engineering, Inc ....
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Anderson Industries, LLC .......................
13:43 May 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
4/28/2017
5/2/2017
5/3/2017
200 4th Avenue, Mapleton, ND 58059 ..
Any party having a substantial
interest in these proceedings may
request a public hearing on the matter.
A written request for a hearing must be
submitted to the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Firms Division, Room
71030, Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no
later than ten (10) calendar days
following publication of this notice.
Please follow the requirements set
forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR
315.9 for procedures to request a public
hearing. The Catalog of Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
4/27/2017
5/5/2017
Domestic Assistance official number
and title for the program under which
these petitions are submitted is 11.313,
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms.
The firm manufactures laminate woven
sewn open mouth sacks.
The firm manufactures close tolerance
CNC machined steel products such
as connecting rods, crankcases,
blocks, heads, and manifolds.
The firm manufactures lightning protection and grounding components.
The firm manufactures raw and machined steel castings utilizing both
sand and investment manufacturing
methods.
The firm manufactures fabricated steel
products for the agriculture, energy,
and other commercial industries.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–008]
Miriam Kearse,
Lead Program Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2017–10024 Filed 5–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P
PO 00000
Product(s)
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel
Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
22806
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 95 / Thursday, May 18, 2017 / Notices
The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
circular welded carbon steel pipes and
tubes from Taiwan. The period of
review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through
April 30, 2016. This review covers Shin
Yang Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang) and
Yieh Hsing Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh
Hsing). The Department preliminarily
determines that Shin Yang made U.S.
sales of subject merchandise below
normal value. In addition, the
Department preliminarily finds that
Yieh Hsing had no reviewable
shipments during the POR. The
preliminary results are listed below in
the section titled ‘‘Preliminary Results
of Review.’’
DATES: Effective May 18, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Hoefke or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4947 or (202) 482–0167,
respectively.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is certain circular welded carbon steel
pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The
product is currently classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) item numbers
7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032,
7306.30.5040, and 7306.30.5055.
Although the HTSUS numbers are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written product
description remains dispositive.1
Methodology
The Department has conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). Export
price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value
(NV) is calculated in accordance with
section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 The
complete description of the scope of the
order appears in the memorandum from Gary
Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from
Taiwan; 2015–2016’’ (dated concurrently with this
notice) (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:43 May 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B–8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
A list of the topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as the Appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
On July 22, 2016, Yieh Hsing reported
that it made no shipments of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR.2 To confirm Yieh Hsing’s no
shipment claim, the Department issued
a no-shipment inquiry to CBP
requesting that it review Yieh Hsing’s
no-shipment claim.3 CBP did not report
that it had any information to contradict
Yieh Hsing’s claim of no shipments
during the POR.
Given that Yieh Hsing certified that it
made no shipments of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR and there is no information
calling its claim into question, we
preliminarily determine that Yieh Hsing
did not have any reviewable
transactions during the POR. Consistent
with the Department’s practice, we will
not rescind the review with respect to
Yieh Hsing but, rather, will complete
the review and issue instructions to CBP
based on the final results.4
2 See Letter to the Department from Yieh Hsing
entitled ‘‘Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel
Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan; No Shipment
Certification,’’ dated July 22, 2016.
3 See No Shipments Inquiry for Certain Circular
Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan
Produced and/or Exported by Yieh Hsing (A–583–
008–003), message number 6363307 (December 28,
2016).
4 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of
Review, Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March
24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final
Determination of No Shipments, and Partial
Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR at 51306
(August 28, 2014)
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine that a
weighted-average dumping margin
exists:
Producer/Exporter
Dumping
margin
(percent)
Shin Yang .............................
1.78
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with these
preliminary results within five days of
the date of publication of this notice.5
Interested parties may submit cases
briefs no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.6
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the due date for
filing case briefs.7 Parties who submit
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.8
Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed
using ACCESS.9 In order to be properly
filed, ACCESS must successfully receive
an electronically-filed document in its
entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS, within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice.10 Requests
should contain: (1) The party’s name,
address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in
the hearing will be limited to those
raised in the respective case and
rebuttal briefs.
Unless otherwise extended, the
Department intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs,
not later than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the
administrative review, the Department
shall determine, and CBP shall assess,
5 See
19 CFR 351.224(b).
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
8 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
9 See 19 CFR 351.303.
10 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
6 See
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 95 / Thursday, May 18, 2017 / Notices
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this review.
If the weighted-average dumping
margin for Shin Yang is not zero or de
minimis in the final results, then the
Department will calculate importerspecific assessment rates. Because Shin
Yang did not report the entered value of
its sales, we will calculate importerspecific per-unit duty assessment rates
by aggregating the total amount of
dumping calculated for the examined
sales of each importer and dividing each
of these amounts by the total quantity
(i.e., weight) associated with those sales.
To determine whether the importerspecific per-unit assessment rates are de
minimis, in accordance with the
requirement set forth in 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will calculate
importer-specific ad valorem rates based
on estimated entered values. Pursuant to
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct
CBP to liquidate without regard to
antidumping duties all entries for which
the importer-specific ad valorem rate is
zero or de minimis.
With respect to Yieh Hsing, if we
continue to find that Yieh Hsing had no
shipments of subject merchandise in the
final results, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate any existing entries of
merchandise produced by Yieh Hsing,
but exported by other parties, at the rate
for the intermediate reseller, if available,
or at the all-others rate.11
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for Shin Yang will
be equal to the weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final
results of this review, except if the rate
is zero or de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in
which case the cash deposit rate will be
zero; (2) for other manufacturers and
exporters covered in a prior segment of
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most
11 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian
Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923
(May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal
from the Russian Federation: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
56989 (September 17, 2010).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:43 May 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which that manufacturer
or exporter participated; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
then the cash deposit rate will be the
rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the manufacturer of subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 9.70
percent, the all-others rate in the LTFV
investigation.12 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notifications
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 10, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
22807
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–045]
1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1Diphosphonic Acid From the People’s
Republic of China: Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty
Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (Department) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC),
the Department is issuing an
antidumping duty order on 1Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic
Acid (HEDP) from the People’s Republic
of China (PRC). We are also amending
our Final Determination to correct
ministerial errors with respect to
Nanjing University of Chemical
Technology Changzhou Wujin Water
Quality Stabilizer Factory and Nantong
Uniphos Chemicals Co., Ltd.
(collectively, WW Group).
DATES: Effective May 18, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Omar Qureshi or Kenneth Hawkins, AD/
CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5307 or (202) 482–6491,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Appendix
Period of Investigation
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
The period of investigation (POI) is
July 1, 2015, through December 30,
2015.1
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
5. Comparisons to Normal Value
6. Product Comparisons
7. Date of Sale
8. Export Price
9. Normal Value
10. Currency Conversion
11. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–10058 Filed 5–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Background
On March 23, 2017, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
Final Determination that HEDP from the
PRC is being, or is likely to be, sold in
the United States at LTFV, as provided
in section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (Act).2 From March 23,
2017, to March 24, 2017, WW Group,
Henan Qingshuiyuan Technology Co.,
Ltd. (Qingshuiyuan), and Compass
Chemical International LLC (the
petitioner) respectively submitted
ministerial allegations concerning the
1 See
12 See
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes
and Tubes from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order,
49 FR 19369 (May 7, 1984).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19 CFR 351.204(b)(1).
1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic
Acid from the People’s Republic of China: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 82
FR 14876 (March 23, 2017) (Final Determination).
2 See
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 95 (Thursday, May 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22805-22807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10058]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-008]
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
[[Page 22806]]
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain circular
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The period of review
(POR) is May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. This review covers Shin
Yang Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang) and Yieh Hsing Enterprise Co., Ltd.
(Yieh Hsing). The Department preliminarily determines that Shin Yang
made U.S. sales of subject merchandise below normal value. In addition,
the Department preliminarily finds that Yieh Hsing had no reviewable
shipments during the POR. The preliminary results are listed below in
the section titled ``Preliminary Results of Review.''
DATES: Effective May 18, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hoefke or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4947 or (202) 482-0167,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is certain circular welded
carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The product is currently
classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) item numbers 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, and
7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written product description remains
dispositive.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The complete description of the scope of the order appears
in the memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Circular Welded
Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan; 2015-2016'' (dated
concurrently with this notice) (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value (NV) is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the
Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 of the main Department
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as the Appendix to this
notice.
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
On July 22, 2016, Yieh Hsing reported that it made no shipments of
subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.\2\ To confirm
Yieh Hsing's no shipment claim, the Department issued a no-shipment
inquiry to CBP requesting that it review Yieh Hsing's no-shipment
claim.\3\ CBP did not report that it had any information to contradict
Yieh Hsing's claim of no shipments during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Letter to the Department from Yieh Hsing entitled
``Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan;
No Shipment Certification,'' dated July 22, 2016.
\3\ See No Shipments Inquiry for Certain Circular Welded Carbon
Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan Produced and/or Exported by Yieh
Hsing (A-583-008-003), message number 6363307 (December 28, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given that Yieh Hsing certified that it made no shipments of
subject merchandise to the United States during the POR and there is no
information calling its claim into question, we preliminarily determine
that Yieh Hsing did not have any reviewable transactions during the
POR. Consistent with the Department's practice, we will not rescind the
review with respect to Yieh Hsing but, rather, will complete the review
and issue instructions to CBP based on the final results.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand;
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged
in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No
Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR at
51306 (August 28, 2014)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that a
weighted-average dumping margin exists:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dumping margin
Producer/Exporter (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shin Yang............................................... 1.78
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to interested parties the
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results
within five days of the date of publication of this notice.\5\
Interested parties may submit cases briefs no later than 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice.\6\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days
after the due date for filing case briefs.\7\ Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary
of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\8\ Case and rebuttal
briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\9\ In order to be properly filed,
ACCESS must successfully receive an electronically-filed document in
its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice.\10\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative review, including the results of
its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than
120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall
determine, and CBP shall assess,
[[Page 22807]]
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of this review.
If the weighted-average dumping margin for Shin Yang is not zero or
de minimis in the final results, then the Department will calculate
importer-specific assessment rates. Because Shin Yang did not report
the entered value of its sales, we will calculate importer-specific
per-unit duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of
dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing
each of these amounts by the total quantity (i.e., weight) associated
with those sales. To determine whether the importer-specific per-unit
assessment rates are de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set
forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will calculate importer-specific ad
valorem rates based on estimated entered values. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to
antidumping duties all entries for which the importer-specific ad
valorem rate is zero or de minimis.
With respect to Yieh Hsing, if we continue to find that Yieh Hsing
had no shipments of subject merchandise in the final results, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced
by Yieh Hsing, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the
intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Shin Yang will
be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the
final results of this review, except if the rate is zero or de minimis
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash
deposit rate will be zero; (2) for other manufacturers and exporters
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding in which that
manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-
fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 9.70 percent, the all-others rate in
the LTFV investigation.\12\ These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes
from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 49 FR 19369 (May 7, 1984).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notifications
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 10, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
5. Comparisons to Normal Value
6. Product Comparisons
7. Date of Sale
8. Export Price
9. Normal Value
10. Currency Conversion
11. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017-10058 Filed 5-17-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
